scholarly journals Pac1/LIS1 promotes an uninhibited conformation of dynein that coordinates its localization and activity

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Marzo ◽  
Jacqueline M. Griswold ◽  
Steven M. Markus
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Extrinsic Factors ◽  
Temporal Precision ◽  
Negative Stain ◽  
Microtubule Motor ◽  
And Function ◽  
High Degree ◽  
In Cells

ABSTRACTCytoplasmic dynein is a minus end-directed microtubule motor that transports myriad cargos in various cell types and contexts. How dynein is regulated to perform all these activities with a high degree of spatial and temporal precision is unclear. Recent studies have revealed that human dynein-1 and dynein-2 can be regulated by a mechanism of autoinhibition, whereby intermolecular contacts limit motor activity. Whether this autoinhibitory mechanism is conserved throughout evolution, whether it can be affected by extrinsic factors, and its precise role in regulating cellular dynein activity remain unknown. Here, we use a combination of negative stain EM, single molecule motility assays, genetic, and cell biological techniques to show that the autoinhibitory conformation is conserved in budding yeast, and it plays an important role in coordinating dynein localization and function in cells. Moreover, we find that the Lissencephaly-related protein, LIS1 (Pac1 in yeast) plays an important role in regulating this autoinhibitory conformation of dynein. Specifically, our studies demonstrate that rather than inhibiting dynein motility, Pac1/LIS1 promotes dynein activity by stabilizing the uninhibited conformation, which ensures appropriate localization and activity of dynein in cells.

scholarly journals Dynactin is required for bidirectional organelle transport

2003 ◽  
Vol 160 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean W. Deacon ◽  
Anna S. Serpinskaya ◽  
Patricia S. Vaughan ◽  
Monica Lopez Fanarraga ◽  
Isabelle Vernos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Types ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Opposite Polarity ◽  
Model System ◽  
Organelle Transport ◽  
Transport Activity ◽  
Microtubule Motors ◽  
Microtubule Motor ◽  
Dynactin Complex ◽  
Binding Subunit

Kinesin II is a heterotrimeric plus end–directed microtubule motor responsible for the anterograde movement of organelles in various cell types. Despite substantial literature concerning the types of organelles that kinesin II transports, the question of how this motor associates with cargo organelles remains unanswered. To address this question, we have used Xenopus laevis melanophores as a model system. Through analysis of kinesin II–mediated melanosome motility, we have determined that the dynactin complex, known as an anchor for cytoplasmic dynein, also links kinesin II to organelles. Biochemical data demonstrates that the putative cargo-binding subunit of Xenopus kinesin II, Xenopus kinesin II–associated protein (XKAP), binds directly to the p150Glued subunit of dynactin. This interaction occurs through aa 530–793 of XKAP and aa 600–811 of p150Glued. These results reveal that dynactin is required for transport activity of microtubule motors of opposite polarity, cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin II, and may provide a new mechanism to coordinate their activities.

scholarly journals Microtubule-based Endoplasmic Reticulum Motility in Xenopus laevis: Activation of Membrane-associated Kinesin during Development

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1909-1922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon D. Lane ◽  
Victoria J. Allan
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Culture Cell ◽  
Tissue Culture Cell ◽  
Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Microtubule Motor ◽  
Directed Motility ◽  
Conventional Kinesin

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in animal cells uses microtubule motor proteins to adopt and maintain its extended, reticular organization. Although the orientation of microtubules in many somatic cell types predicts that the ER should move toward microtubule plus ends, motor-dependent ER motility reconstituted in extracts ofXenopus laevis eggs is exclusively a minus end-directed, cytoplasmic dynein-driven process. We have used Xenopusegg, embryo, and somatic Xenopus tissue culture cell (XTC) extracts to study ER motility during embryonic development inXenopus by video-enhanced differential interference contrast microscopy. Our results demonstrate that cytoplasmic dynein is the sole motor for microtubule-based ER motility throughout the early stages of development (up to at least the fifth embryonic interphase). When egg-derived ER membranes were incubated in somatic XTC cytosol, however, ER tubules moved in both directions along microtubules. Data from directionality assays suggest that plus end-directed ER tubule extensions contribute ∼19% of the total microtubule-based ER motility under these conditions. In XTC extracts, the rate of ER tubule extensions toward microtubule plus ends is lower (∼0.4 μm/s) than minus end-directed motility (∼1.3 μm/s), and plus end-directed motility is eliminated by a function-blocking anti-conventional kinesin heavy chain antibody (SUK4). In addition, we provide evidence that the initiation of plus end-directed ER motility in somatic cytosol is likely to occur via activation of membrane-associated kinesin.

scholarly journals Tanycyte-independent control of hypothalamic leptin signaling

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sooyeon Yoo ◽  
David Cha ◽  
Dong Won Kim ◽  
Thanh V. Hoang ◽  
Seth Blackshaw
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Leptin Receptor ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Leptin Signaling ◽  
And Function ◽  
Induced Changes ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Specific Deletion

AbstractLeptin is secreted by adipocytes to regulate appetite and body weight. Recent studies have reported that tanycytes actively transport circulating leptin across the brain barrier into the hypothalamus, and are required for normal levels of hypothalamic leptin signaling. However, direct evidence for leptin receptor (LepR) expression is lacking, and the effect of tanycyte-specific deletion of LepR has not been investigated. In this study, we analyze the expression and function of the tanycytic LepR in mice. Using single-molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smfISH), RT-qPCR, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq), and selective deletion of the LepR in tanycytes, we are unable to detect expression of LepR in the tanycytes. Tanycyte-specific deletion of LepR likewise did not affect leptin-induced pSTAT3 expression in hypothalamic neurons, regardless of whether leptin was delivered by intraperitoneal or intracerebroventricular injection. Finally, we use activity-regulated scRNA-Seq (act-Seq) to comprehensively profile leptin-induced changes in gene expression in all cell types in mediobasal hypothalamus. Clear evidence for leptin signaling is only seen in endothelial cells and subsets of neurons, although virtually all cell types show leptin-induced changes in gene expression. We thus conclude that LepR expression in tanycytes is either absent or undetectably low, that tanycytes do not directly regulate hypothalamic leptin signaling through a LepR-dependent mechanism, and that leptin regulates gene expression in diverse hypothalamic cell types through both direct and indirect mechanisms.

scholarly journals Bi-fated tendon-to-bone attachment cells are regulated by shared enhancers and KLF transcription factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiri Kult ◽  
Tsviya Olender ◽  
Marco Osterwalder ◽  
Sharon Krief ◽  
Ronnie Blecher-Gonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Transcriptional Enhancer ◽  
Molecular Identity ◽  
And Function

AbstractThe connection between different tissues is vital for the development and function of any organs and systems. In the musculoskeletal system, the attachment of elastic tendons to stiff bones poses a mechanical challenge that is solved by the formation of a transitional tissue, which allows the transfer of muscle forces to the skeleton without tearing. Here, we show that tendon-to-bone attachment cells are bi-fated, activating a mixture of chondrocyte and tenocyte transcriptomes, which is regulated by sharing regulatory elements with these cells and by Krüppel-like factors transcription factors (KLF).To uncover the molecular identity of attachment cells, we first applied high-throughput RNA sequencing to murine humeral attachment cells. The results, which were validated by in situ hybridization and single-molecule in situ hybridization, reveal that attachment cells express hundreds of chondrogenic and tenogenic genes. In search for the underlying mechanism allowing these cells to express these genes, we performed ATAC sequencing and found that attachment cells share a significant fraction of accessible intergenic chromatin areas with either tenocytes or chondrocytes. Epigenomic analysis further revealed transcriptional enhancer signatures for the majority of these regions. We then examined a subset of these regions using transgenic mouse enhancer reporter. Results verified the shared activity of some of these enhancers, supporting the possibility that the transcriptome of attachment cells is regulated by enhancers with shared activities in tenocytes or chondrocytes. Finally, integrative chromatin and motif analyses, as well as the transcriptome data, indicated that KLFs are regulators of attachment cells. Indeed, blocking the expression of Klf2 and Klf4 in the developing limb mesenchyme led to abnormal differentiation of attachment cells, establishing these factors as key regulators of the fate of these cells.In summary, our findings show how the molecular identity of bi-fated attachment cells enables the formation of the unique transitional tissue that connect tendon to bone. More broadly, we show how mixing the transcriptomes of two cell types through shared enhancers and a dedicated set of transcription factors can lead to the formation of a new cell fate that connects them.

scholarly journals Differential Effects of LIS1 On Processive Dynein-Dynactin Motility

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro A. Gutierrez ◽  
Richard J. McKenney
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Regulatory Factor ◽  
Single Molecule Microscopy ◽  
Concentration Dependent Manner ◽  
Dynein Motor ◽  
Microtubule Motor ◽  
Microtubule Motor Protein

AbstractCytoplasmic dynein is the primary minus-end directed microtubule motor protein in cells. LIS1 is a highly conserved dynein regulatory factor that binds directly to the dynein motor domain, uncoupling the enzymatic and mechanical cycles of the motor, and stalling dynein on the microtubule track. Dynactin, another ubiquitous dynein regulatory factor, acts to release dynein from an autoinhibited state, leading to a dramatic increase in fast, processive dynein motility. How these opposing activities are integrated to control dynein motility is unknown. Here we used fluorescence single-molecule microscopy to study the interaction of LIS1 with the processive dynein-dynactin-BicD2N (DDB) complex. Surprisingly, in contrast to the prevailing model for LIS1 function established in the context of dynein alone, we find that binding of LIS1 to DDB does not strongly disrupt processive motility. Motile DDB complexes bind up to two LIS1 dimers, and mutational analysis suggests LIS1 binds directly to the dynein motor domains during DDB movement. Interestingly, LIS1 enhances DDB velocity in a concentration dependent manner, in contrast to observations of LIS1’s effects on the motility of isolated dynein. Thus, LIS1 exerts concentration dependent effects on dynein motility, and can synergize with dynactin to enhance processive movement in the absence of load.

scholarly journals The yeast dynein Dyn2-Pac11 complex is a dynein dimerization/processivity factor: structural and single-molecule characterization

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (15) ◽  
pp. 2362-2377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Rao ◽  
Erin M. Romes ◽  
Matthew P. Nicholas ◽  
Sibylle Brenner ◽  
Ashutosh Tripathy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Motor Activity ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
Processivity Factor ◽  
Molecular Effects ◽  
And Function ◽  
Motor Element

Cytoplasmic dynein is the major microtubule minus end–directed motor. Although studies have probed the mechanism of the C-terminal motor domain, if and how dynein's N-terminal tail and the accessory chains it binds regulate motor activity remain to be determined. Here, we investigate the structure and function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae dynein light (Dyn2) and intermediate (Pac11) chains in dynein heavy chain (Dyn1) movement. We present the crystal structure of a Dyn2-Pac11 complex, showing Dyn2-mediated Pac11 dimerization. To determine the molecular effects of Dyn2 and Pac11 on Dyn1 function, we generated dyn2Δ and dyn2Δpac11Δ strains and analyzed Dyn1 single-molecule motor activity. We find that the Dyn2-Pac11 complex promotes Dyn1 homodimerization and potentiates processivity. The absence of Dyn2 and Pac11 yields motors with decreased velocity, dramatically reduced processivity, increased monomerization, aggregation, and immobility as determined by single-molecule measurements. Deleting dyn2 significantly reduces Pac11-Dyn1 complex formation, yielding Dyn1 motors with activity similar to Dyn1 from the dyn2Δpac11Δ strain. Of interest, motor phenotypes resulting from Dyn2-Pac11 complex depletion bear similarity to a point mutation in the mammalian dynein N-terminal tail (Loa), highlighting this region as a conserved, regulatory motor element.

The Structure and Function Of Intermediate Filament Networks In Mammalian Cells

1985 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 752-755
Author(s):  
Robert D. Goldman ◽  
Anne Goldman ◽  
Jonathan Jones ◽  
Linda Parysek
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Cell ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Protein Composition ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Structural Subunit ◽  
Filament Networks ◽  
Cell Shape Formation ◽  
And Function ◽  
Different Cell Types ◽  
High Degree

Intermediate filaments (IF) are major cytoskeletal components found in most mammalian cells. One of the most intriguing properties of IF is their high degree of variability with regard to their structural subunit proteins. This ariability is most evident when one compares the protein composition of IF from different cell types. For example, nerve cell IF (neurofilaments) contain the so-called neurofilament triplet proteins, while different epithelial cells contain two or more of the family of IF proteins called keratins. Indeed other cell types appear to have primarily a single subunit species such as in fibroblasts (vimentin, decamin) and muscle cells (desmin).In the specific case of the nervous system, there is very little information available on specific functions of neurofilaments, although they are thought to be involved in nerve cell shape formation and maintenance, as well as in axoplasmic transport and flow.

scholarly journals Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels in Nonexcitable Tissues

2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey S. Pitt ◽  
Maiko Matsui ◽  
Chike Cao
Keyword(s):  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Large Data ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Annual Review ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Membrane Excitability ◽  
Voltage Gated ◽  
Cellular Models ◽  
And Function ◽  
In Cells

The identification of a gain-of-function mutation in CACNA1C as the cause of Timothy syndrome, a rare disorder characterized by cardiac arrhythmias and syndactyly, highlighted roles for the L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channel CaV1.2 in nonexcitable cells. Previous studies in cells and animal models had suggested that several voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs) regulated critical signaling events in various cell types that are not expected to support action potential, but definitive data were lacking. VGCCs occupy a special position among ion channels, uniquely able to translate membrane excitability into the cytoplasmic Ca2+ changes that underlie the cellular responses to electrical activity. Yet how these channels function in cells not firing action potentials and what the consequences of their actions are in nonexcitable cells remain critical questions. The development of new animal and cellular models and the emergence of large data sets and unbiased genome screens have added to our understanding of the unanticipated roles for VGCCs in nonexcitable cells. Here, we review current knowledge of VGCC regulation and function in nonexcitable tissues and cells, with the goal of providing a platform for continued investigation. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Physiology, Volume 83 is February 10, 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

scholarly journals Non-coding function for mRNAs in Focal Adhesion Architecture and Mechanotransduction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liana Boraas ◽  
Mengwei Hu ◽  
Lauren Thornton ◽  
Charles E. Vejnar ◽  
Gang Zhen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Focal Adhesions ◽  
Protein Composition ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cell Contractility ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Distinct Sequence ◽  
And Function

AbstractMessenger RNA (mRNA) compartmentalization within the cytosol is well-recognized as a key mechanism of local translation-mediated regulation of protein levels, but whether such localization could be a means of exercising non-coding mRNA function is unknown. Here, we explore non-coding functions for mRNAs associated with focal adhesions (FAs), cellular structures responsible for mediating cell adhesion and response to changes in the extracellular matrix (ECM). Using high-throughput single molecule imaging and genomic profiling approaches, we find that mRNAs with distinct sequence characteristics localize to FAs in different human cell types. Notably, ∼85% of FA-mRNAs are not translationally active at steady state or under conditions of FA dissolution or activation. Untranslated mRNA sequences are anchored to FA based on their functional states by the RNA binding protein, G3BP1, forming biomolecular granules. Removing RNA or G3BP1, but not blocking new polypeptide synthesis, dramatically changes FA protein composition and organization, resulting in loss of cell contractility and cellular ability to adapt to changing ECM. We have therefor uncovered a novel, non-coding role for mRNAs as scaffolds to maintain FA structure and function, broadening our understating of noncanonical mRNA functions.

scholarly journals Obesity and adiposity have opposing genetic impacts on human blood traits

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S Thom ◽  
Madison B Wilken ◽  
Stella T Chou ◽  
Benjamin Franklin Voight
Keyword(s):  
Blood Cell ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Leptin Receptor ◽  
Cell Formation ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Extrinsic Factors ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
And Function ◽  
Genetically Determined

Obesity, hyperlipidemia, and truncal adiposity concordantly elevate cardiovascular disease risks, but have unknown genetic effects on blood trait variation. Using Mendelian randomization, we define unexpectedly opposing roles for generalized obesity and truncal adiposity on blood traits. Elevated genetically determined body mass index (BMI) and lipid levels decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, explaining consistent with clinical observations associating obesity and anemia. However, lipid-related effects were confined to erythroid traits, whereas BMI affected multiple blood lineages, indicating broad effects on hematopoiesis. BMI-related effects were unexpectedly opposed by truncal adipose distribution, which increased hemoglobin and blood cell counts across lineages. Conditional analyses indicated genes, pathways, and cell types responsible for these effects, including Leptin Receptor and other blood cell-extrinsic factors in adipocytes and endothelium, which regulate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell biology. Our findings identify novel roles for obesity and adipose distribution on hematopoiesis and show that genetically determined adiposity plays a previously underappreciated role in determining blood cell formation and function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document