III/V Wafer Bonding Technology for Wafer-Level Fabrication of GaInAsP/InP Microring Resonators

Author(s):  
V. Dragoi ◽  
G. Mittendorfer ◽  
C. Thanner ◽  
P. Lindner ◽  
M. Alexe ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 345-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Kurz ◽  
T. Plach ◽  
J. Suss ◽  
T. Wagenleitner ◽  
D. Zinner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 187-215
Author(s):  
Jikai Xu ◽  
Zhihao Ren ◽  
Bowei Dong ◽  
Chenxi Wang ◽  
Yanhong Tian ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 446 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Auberton‐Hervé ◽  
T. Barge ◽  
F. Metral ◽  
M. Bruel ◽  
B. Aspar ◽  
...  

AbstractThe advantage of SOI wafers for device manufacture has been widely studied. To be a real challenger to bulk silicon, SOI producers have to offer SOI wafers in large volume and at low cost. The new Smart‐Cut® SOI process used for the manufacture of the Unibond® SOI wafers answers most of the SOI wafer manufacturability issues. The use of Hydrogen implantation and wafer bonding technology is the best combination to get good uniformity and high quality for both the SOI and buried oxide layer. In this paper, the Smart‐Cut® process is described in detail and material characteristics of Unibond® wafers such as crystalline quality, surface roughness, thin film thickness homogeneity, and electric behavior.


Author(s):  
Kenta Nakazawa ◽  
Takashi Sasaki ◽  
Hiromasa Furuta ◽  
Jiro Kamiya ◽  
Hideki Sasaki ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 145-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Plach ◽  
Bernhard Rebhan ◽  
Viorel Dragoi ◽  
Thomas Wagenleitner ◽  
Markus Wimplinger ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 000698-000725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zoschke ◽  
Klaus-Dieter Lang

Further cost reduction and miniaturization of electronic systems requires new concepts for highly efficient packaging of MEMS components like RF resonators or switches, quartz crystals, bolometers, BAWs etc. This paper describes suitable base technologies for the miniaturized, low-cost wafer level chip-scale packaging of such MEMS. The approaches are based on temporary handling and permanent bonding of cap structures using adhesives or solder onto passive or active silicon wafers which are populated with MEMS components or the MEMS wafer themselves. Firstly, an overview of the possible packaging configurations based on different types of MEMS is discussed where TSV based and non-TSV based packaging solutions are distinguished in general. The cap structure for the TSV based solution can have the same size as the MEMS carrying substrate, since the electrical contacts for the MEMS can be routed either thought the cap or base substrate. Thus, full format cap wafers can be used in a regular wafer to wafer bonding process to create the wafer level cavity packages. However, if no TSVs are present in the cap or base substrate, the cap structure needs to be smaller than the base chip, so that electrical contacts outside the cap area can be accessed after the caps were bonded. Such a wafer level capping with caps smaller than the corresponding base chips can be obtained in two ways. The first approach is based on fabrication and singulation of the caps followed by their temporary face up assembly in the desired pattern on a help wafer. In a subsequent wafer to wafer bonding sequence all caps are transferred onto the base wafer. Finally the help wafer is removed from the back side of the bonded caps. This approach of reconfigured wafer bonding is especially used for uniform cap patterns or, if MEMS have an own bond frame structure. In that case no additional cap is required, since the MEMS can act as their own cap. The second approach is based on cap structure fabrication using a compound wafer stack consisting of two temporary bonded wafers. One wafer acts as carrier wafer whereas the other wafer is processed to form cap structures. Processes like thinning, silicon dry etching, deposition and structuring of polymer or metal bonding frames are performed to generate free-standing and face-up directed cap structures. The so created “cap donor wafer” is used in a wafer to wafer bonding process to bond all caps permanently to the corresponding MEMS base wafer. Finally, the temporary bonded carrier wafer is removed from the backside of the transferred caps. With that approach a fully custom specific and selective wafer level capping is possible featuring irregular cap patterns and locations on the MEMS base wafer. Examples like the selective capping process for RF MEMS switches are presented and discussed in detail. All processes were performed at 200mm wafer level.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 001847-001884
Author(s):  
Peter Ramm ◽  
Armin Klumpp ◽  
Alan Mathewson ◽  
Kafil M. Razeeb ◽  
Reinhard Pufall

The European 3D heterogeneous integration platform has been established by the consortium of the Integrated Project e-BRAINS [1], where technologies of the following relevant main categories of 3D integration are provided to enable future applications of smart sensor systems:3D System-on-Chip Integration - 3D-SOC: TSV technology for stacking of thinned devices or large IC blocks (global level),3D Wafer-Level-Packaging - 3D-WLP: embedding technology with through-polymer vias (TPV) for stacking of thinned ICs on wafer-level (no TSV), and3D System-in-Package - 3D-SIP: 3D stacking of packaged devices or substrates *definitions according to [2] Regarding TSV performance, the applications do not need ultra-high vertical interconnect densities as for 3D stacked Integrated Circuits – 3D-SIC*. Nevertheless, the lateral sizes of the TSVs are preferably minimized to allow for place and route for small “open” IC areas. Smaller TSVs are also preferred in order to reduce thermo-mechanical stress. e-BRAINS' focus is on how heterogeneous integration and sensor device technologies can be combined to bring new performance levels to targeted applications with high market potentials. The consortium, under coordination of Infineon and technical management by Fraunhofer EMFT, is composed of major European system manufacturers (Infineon, Siemens, SensoNor, 3D PLUS, Vermon and IQE), SMEs (DMCE, Magna Diagnostics, SORIN and eesy-ID), the large research institutions CEA Grenoble, Fraunhofer (EMFT Munich & IIS-EAS Dresden), imec, SINTEF, Tyndall and ITE Warsaw, and universities (EPFL Lausanne, TU Chemnitz and TU Graz). Target applications include automotive, ambient living and medical devices, with a specific focus on wireless sensor systems. Concerning the enabling 3D Heterogeneous Integration Platform, the e-BRAINS partners are working close together, where Infineon, Fraunhofer EMFT, imec and SINTEF are focusing mainly on 3D-SOC and 3D-WLP, and the French system manufacturer 3D PLUS and Tyndall on 3D-WLP and 3D-SIP technologies. The focus of this paper is on low-temperature bonding processes for highly reliable 3D integrated sensor systems. One of the key issues for heterogeneous systems production is the impact of 3D processes to the reliability of the product, i.e. the high built-in stresses caused by e.g. the CTE mismatch of complex layer structures (thin Si, ILDs, metals etc.) in combination with elevated bonding temperatures. As consequence, extensive project work was dedicated in the developments of reliable low-temperature bonding processes. Mainly intermetallic compound (IMC) bonding with Cu/Sn metal systems supported by ultrasonic agitation (Fraunhofer EMFT) was successfully introduced in 3D integration technology (see Fig. 2). A copper/tin solid-liquid interdiffusion (SLID) system was investigated using ultrasonic agitation to reduce the assembly temperature below the melting point of tin. Cleaning procedures are important shortly before joining the samples; dry cleaning has best results due to removal of thin oxide layers. Figure 2 shows a cross section of US supported Cu/Sn bonding at 150C. The intermetallic compounds Cu3Sn and Cu6Sn5 as well as pure tin easily can be identified. Due to low temperature assembly the most stable intermetallic compound (IMC) Cu3Sn has a minor share of the metal system. Most importantly there is no gap between top and bottom part of the joint despite the macroscopic assembly temperature is far away from the melting point of tin. But maybe the ultrasonic agitation brings enough energy to the interfaces, so locally melting can occur. In this way robust IMC bonding technology at 150C could be demonstrated with shear forces of 17 MPa and an alignment accuracy of 3 μm, well-suited for 3D integration. Figure 2: Low-temperature IMC bonding technology using ultrasonic agitation (Fraunhofer EMFT) Reliability for SLID contacts is certainly a very challenging objective especially looking for robust solutions in automotive applications. Thermally induced mechanical stress is the main reason for early fails during temperature cycling. Cross sectioned samples were investigated and methods like nanoindentation, Raman spectroscopy, fibDAC, and high local resolution x-ray scattering were applied to measure the intrinsic stresses. It can be shown that low temperature bonding is the right approach to avoid excessive stress cracking the interface or even fracturing the silicon. Also fatigue of metals can be reduced in a range that plastic deformation is no lifetime limiting factor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document