scholarly journals Wall-Normal Velocity Correlations in a Zero Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layer

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvain Morilhat ◽  
François Chedevergne ◽  
Francis Micheli ◽  
Frank Simon
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Wall Pressure ◽  
Convection Velocity ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Normal Velocity ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Velocity Fluctuations ◽  
Taylor’S Hypothesis

Abstract An experimental campaign dedicated to the characterization of the wall-normal velocity correlations in a zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer was performed. A double set of laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) benches were used to access two-point two-time correlations of the wall-normal velocity. The measurements analysis confirms several important hypotheses classically made to model wall pressure spectra from the velocity correlations. In particular, the ratio of the wall-normal Reynolds stress to the turbulent shear stress is confirmed to exhibit a large plateau in the logarithmic region. In addition, Taylor's hypothesis of frozen turbulence is well recovered for the wall-normal velocity fluctuations. The convection velocity for the wall-normal velocity fluctuations is also shown to evolve across the boundary layer, according to the mean velocity profile. Furthermore, the decorrelation time scale of velocity correlations appears to be increasing throughout the boundary layer thickness in accordance with the increase of the convection velocity. The results obtained with this original campaign will help improving models for wall pressure spectra, especially those based on the resolution of the Poisson equation for the pressure for which the wall pressure correlations are related to the wall-normal velocity correlations.

The accelerated fully rough turbulent boundary layer

1977 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh W. Coleman ◽  
Robert J. Moffat ◽  
William M. Kays
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Stress Tensor ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Shape Factor ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Smooth Wall ◽  
Mean Velocity

The behaviour of a fully rough turbulent boundary layer subjected to favourable pressure gradients both with and without blowing was investigated experimentally using a porous test surface composed of densely packed spheres of uniform size. Measurements of profiles of mean velocity and the components of the Reynolds-stress tensor are reported for both unblown and blown layers. Skin-friction coefficients were determined from measurements of the Reynolds shear stress and mean velocity.An appropriate acceleration parameterKrfor fully rough layers is defined which is dependent on a characteristic roughness dimension but independent of molecular viscosity. For a constant blowing fractionFgreater than or equal to zero, the fully rough turbulent boundary layer reaches an equilibrium state whenKris held constant. Profiles of the mean velocity and the components of the Reynolds-stress tensor are then similar in the flow direction and the skin-friction coefficient, momentum thickness, boundary-layer shape factor and the Clauser shape factor and pressure-gradient parameter all become constant.Acceleration of a fully rough layer decreases the normalized turbulent kinetic energy and makes the turbulence field much less isotropic in the inner region (forFequal to zero) compared with zero-pressure-gradient fully rough layers. The values of the Reynolds-shear-stress correlation coefficients, however, are unaffected by acceleration or blowing and are identical with values previously reported for smooth-wall and zero-pressure-gradient rough-wall flows. Increasing values of the roughness Reynolds number with acceleration indicate that the fully rough layer does not tend towards the transitionally rough or smooth-wall state when accelerated.

Measurements in a Turbulent Boundary Layer Over a d-Type Surface Roughness

1975 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Wood ◽  
R. A. Antonia
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Energy ◽  
Shear Stresses ◽  
Normal Velocity ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Outer Flow ◽  
Intensity Measurements ◽  
Normal And Shear Stresses

Mean velocity and turbulence intensity measurements have been made in a fully developed turbulent boundary layer over a d-type surface roughness. This roughness is characterised by regular two-dimensional elements of square cross section placed one element width apart, with the cavity flow between elements being essentially isolated from the outer flow. The measurements show that this boundary layer closely satisfies the requirement of exact self-preservation. Distribution across the layer of Reynolds normal and shear stresses are closely similar to those found over a smooth surface except for the region immediately above the grooves. This similarity extends to distributions of third and fourth-order moments of longitudinal and normal velocity fluctuations and also to the distribution of turbulent energy dissipation. The present results are compared with those obtained for a k-type or sand grained roughness.

The structure of a highly decelerated axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer

2021 ◽  
Vol 929 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Agastya Balantrapu ◽  
Christopher Hickling ◽  
W. Nathan Alexander ◽  
William Devenport
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Boundary Layer Thickness ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Convection Velocity ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
The Mean

Experiments were performed over a body of revolution at a length-based Reynolds number of 1.9 million. While the lateral curvature parameters are moderate ( $\delta /r_s < 2, r_s^+>500$ , where $\delta$ is the boundary layer thickness and r s is the radius of curvature), the pressure gradient is increasingly adverse ( $\beta _{C} \in [5 \text {--} 18]$ where $\beta_{C}$ is Clauser’s pressure gradient parameter), representative of vehicle-relevant conditions. The mean flow in the outer regions of this fully attached boundary layer displays some properties of a free-shear layer, with the mean-velocity and turbulence intensity profiles attaining self-similarity with the ‘embedded shear layer’ scaling (Schatzman & Thomas, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 815, 2017, pp. 592–642). Spectral analysis of the streamwise turbulence revealed that, as the mean flow decelerates, the large-scale motions energize across the boundary layer, growing proportionally with the boundary layer thickness. When scaled with the shear layer parameters, the distribution of the energy in the low-frequency region is approximately self-similar, emphasizing the role of the embedded shear layer in the large-scale motions. The correlation structure of the boundary layer is discussed at length to supply information towards the development of turbulence and aeroacoustic models. One major finding is that the estimation of integral turbulence length scales from single-point measurements, via Taylor's hypothesis, requires significant corrections to the convection velocity in the inner 50 % of the boundary layer. The apparent convection velocity (estimated from the ratio of integral length scale to the time scale), is approximately 40 % greater than the local mean velocity, suggesting the turbulence is convected much faster than previously thought. Closer to the wall even higher corrections are required.

Predicting Turbulent Boundary Layer Wall Pressure Fluctuations in Adverse Pressure Gradients

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Aldrich
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Wall Pressure ◽  
Prediction Tool ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Wall Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
The Difference

A physics-based approach is employed and a new prediction tool is developed to predict the wavevector-frequency spectrum of the turbulent boundary layer wall pressure fluctuations for subsonic airfoils under the influence of adverse pressure gradients. The prediction tool uses an explicit relationship developed by D. M. Chase, which is based on a fit to zero pressure gradient data. The tool takes into account the boundary layer edge velocity distribution and geometry of the airfoil, including the blade chord and thickness. Comparison to experimental adverse pressure gradient data shows a need for an update to the modeling constants of the Chase model. To optimize the correlation between the predicted turbulent boundary layer wall pressure spectrum and the experimental data, an optimization code (iSIGHT) is employed. This optimization module is used to minimize the absolute value of the difference (in dB) between the predicted values and those measured across the analysis frequency range. An optimized set of modeling constants is derived that provides reasonable agreement with the measurements.

Wall Pressure Phase Velocity Measurements in a Turbulent Boundary Layer

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa S. Miller ◽  
Mark J. Moeller
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Phase Velocity ◽  
Group Velocity ◽  
Noise Source ◽  
Wall Pressure ◽  
Interior Noise ◽  
Convection Velocity ◽  
Phase Velocities ◽  
Wall Pressure Fluctuation

The turbulent boundary layer that forms on the outer surfaces of vehicles can be a significant source of interior noise. In automobiles this is known as wind noise, and at high speeds it dominates the interior noise. For airplanes the turbulent boundary is also a dominant noise source. Because of its importance as a noise source, it is desirable to have a model of the turbulent wall pressure fluctuations for interior noise prediction. One important parameter in building the wall pressure fluctuation model is the convection velocity. In this paper, the phase velocity was determined from the streamwise pressure measurements. The phase velocity was calculated for three separation distances ranging from 0.25 to 1.30 boundary layer thicknesses. These measurements were made for a Mach number range of 0.1 < M < 0.6. The phase velocity was shown to vary with sensor spacing and frequency. The data collapsed well on outer variable normalization. The phase velocities were fit and the group velocity was calculated from the curve fit. The group velocity was consistent with the array measured convection velocities. The group velocity was also estimated by a band limited cross correlation technique that used the Hilbert transform to find the energy delay. This result was consistent with the group velocity inferred from the phase velocities and the array measured convection velocity. From this research, it is suggested that the group velocity found in this study should be used to estimate the convection velocity in wall pressure fluctuation models.

scholarly journals Pressure fluctuations induced by a hypersonic turbulent boundary layer

2016 ◽  
Vol 804 ◽  
pp. 578-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lian Duan ◽  
Meelan M. Choudhari ◽  
Chao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Pressure ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Propagation Speed ◽  
Dominant Frequency ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Taylor’S Hypothesis

Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are used to examine the pressure fluctuations generated by a spatially developed Mach 5.86 turbulent boundary layer. The unsteady pressure field is analysed at multiple wall-normal locations, including those at the wall, within the boundary layer (including inner layer, the log layer, and the outer layer), and in the free stream. The statistical and structural variations of pressure fluctuations as a function of wall-normal distance are highlighted. Computational predictions for mean-velocity profiles and surface pressure spectrum are in good agreement with experimental measurements, providing a first ever comparison of this type at hypersonic Mach numbers. The simulation shows that the dominant frequency of boundary-layer-induced pressure fluctuations shifts to lower frequencies as the location of interest moves away from the wall. The pressure wave propagates with a speed nearly equal to the local mean velocity within the boundary layer (except in the immediate vicinity of the wall) while the propagation speed deviates from Taylor’s hypothesis in the free stream. Compared with the surface pressure fluctuations, which are primarily vortical, the acoustic pressure fluctuations in the free stream exhibit a significantly lower dominant frequency, a greater spatial extent, and a smaller bulk propagation speed. The free-stream pressure structures are found to have similar Lagrangian time and spatial scales as the acoustic sources near the wall. As the Mach number increases, the free-stream acoustic fluctuations exhibit increased radiation intensity, enhanced energy content at high frequencies, shallower orientation of wave fronts with respect to the flow direction, and larger propagation velocity.

Characterization of the Response of a Curved Elastic Shell to Turbulent Boundary Layer

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Magionesi ◽  
Elena Ciappi
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Wall Pressure ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Spectral Densities ◽  
Flow Parameters ◽  
Wall Pressure Fluctuations

For the effective operation of sonar system mounted inside the bulbous of a fast ship, it is important to reduce all the possible noise and vibration sources that cause the dome to vibrate thus radiating noise and interfering with sonar sensor response. In particular, pressure fluctuations induced by the turbulent boundary layer on the surface of the sonar dome represent one of the major sources of self-noise for the on board sensors. Calculation of the structural vibrations and of the noise radiated inside the dome requires as a first step the characterization of the frequency spectra of turbulent boundary layer excitation. Most of the literature related to wall pressure fluctuations is devoted to the study of equilibrium turbulent boundary layers on flat plates in zero pressure gradient (ZPG) flow, for which scaling laws for the power spectral densities and empirical models for the cross spectral densities are well established. The turbulent boundary layer on the bulbous can present several differences with respect to the canonical case because of the presence of hull surface curvatures and of the free water surface that produce pressure gradient variation along the bulbous surface. Moreover, hydrodynamic coincidence effects play a markedly different role in the underwater problem than in the aerodynamic problem. Therefore, an experimental campaign was performed in a towing tank to measure wall pressure fluctuations at different locations along a large scale model of a bulbous and to investigate their spectral characteristics in terms of auto and cross spectral densities. Boundary layer mean flow parameters were obtained with a finite volume code solving the Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Equations. The auto spectral densities (ASD) of the measured wall pressure fluctuations were scaled using different combinations of inner and outer flow parameters in order to make ASD independent of the tested conditions i.e. of Reynolds number. The modelled load was used as input for a numerical procedure aimed at evaluating the dynamical response of a section of the bulbous under analysis. The validation of this procedure was experimentally obtained through the measurements of the vibrational response of an elastic section inserted into the bulbous model. Moreover, this comparison indirectly provides additional insights on the physics of wall pressure fluctuations for complex flows.

scholarly journals On the generation of the mean velocity profile for turbulent boundary layers with pressure gradient under equilibrium conditions

2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (1180) ◽  
pp. 569-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rona ◽  
M. Monti ◽  
C. Airiau
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Velocity Profile ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Fluid Dynamic ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Computational Domain ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Number Range

AbstractThe generation of a fully turbulent boundary layer profile is investigated using analytical and numerical methods over the Reynolds number range 422 ≤ Reθ≤ 31,000. The numerical method uses a new mixing length blending function. The predictions are validated against reference wind tunnel measurements under zero streamwise pressure gradient. The methods are then tested for low and moderate adverse pressure gradients. Comparison against experiment and DNS data show a good predictive ability under zero pressure gradient and moderate adverse pressure gradient, with both methods providing a complete velocity profile through the viscous sub-layer down to the wall. These methods are useful computational fluid dynamic tools for generating an equilibrium thick turbulent boundary layer at the computational domain inflow.

Some measurements in the self-preserving jet

1969 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 577-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Wygnanski ◽  
H. Fiedler
Keyword(s):  
Low Frequency ◽  
Convection Velocity ◽  
Hot Wire ◽  
Frequency Range ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Frequency Spectra ◽  
Velocity Fluctuations ◽  
Taylor’S Hypothesis ◽  
Velocity Turbulence ◽  
Made In

The axisymmetric turbulent incompressible and isothermal jet was investigated by use of linearized constant-temperature hot-wire anemometers. It was established that the jet was truly self-preserving some 70 diameters downstream of the nozzle and most of the measurements were made in excess of this distance. The quantities measured include mean velocity, turbulence stresses, intermittency, skewness and flatness factors, correlations, scales, low-frequency spectra and convection velocity. The r.m.s. values of the various velocity fluctuations differ from those measured previously as a result of lack of self-preservation and insufficient frequency range in the instrumentation of the previous investigations. It appears that Taylor's hypothesis is not applicable to this flow, but the use of convection velocity of the appropriate scale for the transformation from temporal to spatial quantities appears appropriate. The energy balance was calculated from the various measured quantities and the result is quite different from the recent measurements of Sami (1967), which were obtained twenty diameters downstream from the nozzle. In light of these measurements some previous hypotheses about the turbulent structure and the transport phenomena are discussed. Some of the quantities were obtained by two or more different methods, and their relative merits and accuracy are assessed.

scholarly journals Dynamic roughness perturbation of a turbulent boundary layer

2011 ◽  
Vol 688 ◽  
pp. 258-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Jacobi ◽  
B. J. McKeon
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Mode Shapes ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Normal Velocity ◽  
Velocity Fluctuations ◽  
Eigenmode Analysis ◽  
Dynamic Perturbation ◽  
Non Equilibrium

AbstractThe zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer over a flat plate was perturbed by a temporally oscillating, spatial impulse of roughness, and the downstream response of the flow field was interrogated by hot-wire anemometry and particle-image velocimetry. The key features common to impulsively perturbed boundary layers, as identified in Jacobi & McKeon (J. Fluid Mech., 2011), were investigated, and the unique contributions of the dynamic perturbation were isolated by contrast with an appropriately matched static impulse of roughness. In addition, the dynamic perturbation was decomposed into separable large-scale and small-scale structural effects, which in turn were associated with the organized wave and roughness impulse aspects of the perturbation. A phase-locked velocity decomposition of the entire downstream flow field revealed strongly coherent modes of fluctuating velocity, with distinct mode shapes for the streamwise and wall-normal velocity components. Following the analysis of McKeon & Sharma (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 658, 2010, pp. 336–382), the roughness perturbation was treated as a forcing of the Navier–Stokes equation and a linearized analysis employing a modified Orr–Sommerfeld operator was performed. The experimentally ascertained wavespeed of the input disturbance was used to solve for the most amplified singular mode of the Orr–Sommerfeld resolvent. These calculated modes were then compared with the streamwise and wall-normal velocity fluctuations. The discrepancies between the calculated Orr–Sommerfeld resolvent modes and those experimentally observed by phase-locked averaging of the velocity field were postulated to result from the violation of the parallel flow assumption of Orr–Sommerfeld analysis, as well as certain non-equilibrium effects of the roughness. Additionally, some difficulties previously observed using a quasi-laminar eigenmode analysis were also observed under the resolvent approach; however, the resolvent analysis was shown to provide reasonably accurate predictions of velocity fluctuations for the forced Orr–Sommerfeld problem over a portion of the boundary layer, with potential applications to designing efficient flow control strategies. The combined experimental and analytical effort provides a new opportunity to examine the non-equilibrium and forcing effects in a dynamically perturbed flow.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document