Procedures and Principles of Sport Psychological Assessment

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Beckmann ◽  
Michael Kellmann

In this paper we discuss some of the factors sport psychologists should consider before administering questionnaires or other formal assessment instruments to athletes. To be used effectively, assessment instruments need to be (a) reliable and valid for the individual athlete or sport group in question, (b) seen as useful by the athlete(s) completing the instrument, and be (c) completed honestly by the athlete(s). Additional objectives sport psychologists should strive to achieve include a clear identification of the purpose of the assessment instrument, the commitment of athlete and coach to the assessment process, and the maintenance of a clear channel of communication with coaches and athletes throughout the period of psychological assessment, training, feedback, evaluation, and adjustment.

2002 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Hodge ◽  
Trina R. Williams

While there is increasing awareness that spirituality is a central dimension of human existence, there are few assessment instruments that operationalize spiritual strengths in a clinically useful manner. Further, instruments tailored specifically for African Americans, the population for whom spirituality may be most salient, have been almost completely lacking in the literature. Correspondingly, this paper develops a diagrammatic assessment instrument, spiritual ecomaps, for assessing African American spirituality. After delineating the theoretical components of a spiritual ecomap, practical suggestions are given for the instrument's use, including a number of possible interventions that flow from the assessment process. A case study is provided to familiarize the reader with the instrument. The paper concludes by offering suggestions for using the instrument for other populations in a culturally sensitive manner.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 288
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Suci Yundarini ◽  
Dewa Nyoman Sudana ◽  
I Gede Astawan

The assessment instrument is an important component needed in the learning assessment process. However, in practice, there are still many teachers who have not been able to produce quality assessment instruments. The purpose of this study was to produce valid and reliable assessment instruments for social attitudes and social studies learning outcomes in class V on theme of lingkungan sekitar kita. In this study using a 4D development model, namely define, design, develop, disseminate. In this development research, it is only up to the development stage. The instrument used for the assessment of social attitudes was a questionnaire (questionnaire), while for the assessment of social studies learning outcomes used was a multiple-choice test. The data obtained would be analyzed the validity and reliability of each assessment instrument. The results of the analysis of the validity of the social attitude assessment instrument and social studies learning outcomes obtained an average value of 1, which means that the two assessment instruments have very high validity, while the results of the analysis of the reliability of the social attitude assessment instrument are 0,89 and the reliability of the social studies learning outcomes assessment instrument is 0,89. 0,85 which means that these two instruments have a high level of reliability. From these results, it can be concluded that the development of an assessment instrument for social attitudes and social studies learning outcomes is feasible to use in assessing students.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Epinur Epinur ◽  
Afrida Afrida ◽  
Fuldiaratman Fuldiaratman

The assessment process is usually done at school so far only able to describe aspects mahamahasiswa improvement in cognitive ability. This research is the development (development research) with the intended target is the development of assessment instruments which are focused realm is the psychomotor. This study uses ADDIE development model which consists of three phases: analysis, design, and development. Product psychomotor assessment instruments validated by expert lecturers material and design. Psychomotor assessment instruments developed tested on a small scale (limited). Assessment instruments in the form of observation sheet consisting of three aspects of the assessment (preparation, process, and product). From the results of analysis of the assessment of psychomotor aspects of preparation, assessment processes and products obtained during one session that students are very well categorized as 75.76%, 21.21% as much good criteria, and the criteria pretty well as much as 3.03%. As for the category of poor and very poor are not found in the assessment process (0%). And to answer the questionnaire responses obtained lecturer with a score of 86.67% percentage, so in theory faculty response to the products included in the category of very strong or positive. The conclusion of this study is the psychomotor assessment instrument developed by the author can be used to measure the psychomotor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Barquero-Ruiz ◽  
José Luis Arias-Estero ◽  
David Kirk

The assessment of tactics is a subject of great interest in physical education and sport pedagogy. However, the lack of knowledge of the topic and the variety of assessment instruments make the assessment of tactics difficult. This study aimed to describe assessment in relation to tactical learning outcomes through an analysis of assessment instruments, based on variables that must be considered when using an instrument: (a) criteria definitions; (b) tactical levels; (c) indexes; (d) units of observation; (e) player/learner roles; and (f) institutional contexts. Hence, the following instruments were found: Game Performance Assessment Instrument, spatial location instruments, game performance evaluation tool, team sport assessment procedure, and system of tactical assessment in Soccer. Building on the review’s purpose, the following issues were found. First, some studies reviewed used non-validated criteria. Second, not all studies considered the three tactical levels (match level, partial forefront level and primary level). Third, the majority of the studies used indexes that masked the results. Fourth, the individual unit of observation was widely used to assess global tactical learning outcomes. Fifth, many instruments were used in contexts for which they were not validated. According to these limitations, general recommendations are proposed. First, researchers should use validated instruments as long as the characteristics of the instruments are aligned with the nature of the study. Second, it is recommended when validating an instrument to consider the following general guidelines: (a) only use validated criteria descriptions; (b) include all three tactical levels; (c) do not use indexes; (d) use the team as the unit of observation; (e) assess both defender and attacker roles; (f) develop the instrument in the same institutional context as the study context; (g) include context variables if applicable.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Sadri ◽  
Abdurahman Adisaputera ◽  
Syahnan Daulay

Early observations made on the Indonesian language teacher, Henny Indriany, S.Pd. at SMAN 3 Medan, explained that the assessment instrument carried out by the teacher was only on the selected assessment technique according to the characteristics or abilities of students. Whereas the assessment process in writing scientific papers is very good and effective if the principles of this assessment are considered when the teacher is: (1) there are clear restrictions on what is prioritized for assessment. (2) the selected assessment technique must be in accordance with the characteristics or abilities to be measured. (3) comprehensive assessment requires various types of assessment techniques. (4) should be aware that the assessment techniques used have limitations. (5) the assessment must be used to improve the learning achievement of students. Data regarding the quality of the character assessment instrument based on rational data (validator assessment) is taken using a validation sheet filled in by experts in the field of educational assessment, and the preparation of a psychological scale. The expert validation sheet consists of four answer scores, namely 1, 2, 3, and 4. The number of questions is 20 items so that the range of scores obtained is between 20-80. The results obtained are converted into the following eligibility criteria. Learning Indonesian, especially writing poetry based on character education which is served to students, aims to train students to be skilled in language, especially writing by expressing ideas and feelings creatively and critically. Learning to write poetry in high school according to the 2013 Curriculum aims to improve the skills of students in appropriate and creative language, increase the ability to think logically, critically and reason, and increase the sensitivity of feelings and the ability of students to understand and implement the values of character education in everyday life. day and in the school environment.


Author(s):  
Hanifah Sitorus Pane ◽  
Syahnan Daulay ◽  
M. Oky Ferdian Gafari

Peer assessment is a form of assessment of a student towards other students. In peer assessment, students are involved directly in the assessment process. The aim is to develop of a peer assessment scientific attitude assessment instrument on learning short story text of XI students at State Senior High School 1 Kualuh Hilir. Methodology of this research uses quantitative and to find the results of the development research presented in this discussion are, describing the process of developing a scientific assessment instrument based on peer assessment, describing the feasibility of peer assessment based scientific attitude assessment instruments, describing the results of testing instruments for evaluating students' scientific attitudes based on peer assessment in short story text learning.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Wright ◽  
A. Jill Clemence ◽  
Hadas Pade ◽  
David M. McCord

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Childa Kumala Azzahri ◽  
Dwi Widjanarko ◽  
I Made Sudana

Instrumen penilaian merupakan bagian dari suatu proses penilaian dalam pembelajaran, apa yang hendak diukur dalam pembelajaran terkait dengan ketersediaan alat ukur yang dikembangkan. Tujuan penelitian yaitu untuk menganalisis validitas, reliabilitas, dan keefektifan instrumen. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian dan pengembangan (R & D). Tahapan pada R & D yaitu 1) analisis kebutuhan; 2) rancangan produk; 3) desain dan pengembangan; 4) validasi ahli; 5) revisi produk awal; 6) uji coba terbatas; 7) revisi produk; 8) uji coba diperluas; 9) revisi dan analisis hasil uji coba. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji validitas instrumen menggunakan korelasi product moment, uji reliabilitas instrumen menggunakan koefisien kappa dari Cohen dan uji keefektifan menggunakan analisis Uji normalized-gain. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hasil pretest nilainya 79 dan posttest nilainya 83 pada uji coba terbatas, sedangkan pada uji coba diperluas didapatkan hasil tidak jauh berbeda dengan uji coba terbatas yaitu pretest 0,3 dan posttest 0,4. Validitas instrumen sebesar 0,878 yang menunjukkan valid, reliabilitas instrumen sebesar 0.721 yang menunjukan ketegori baik dan keefektifan instrumen terdapat skor 0.3 yang memiliki tingkat efektivitas sedang. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa instrumen penilaian praktik rias pengantin Jogja Paes Ageng baku, valid dan efektif digunakan untuk menilai penilaian praktik sesuai dengan kompetensi mata kuliah.Assessment instrument is part of the assessment process in the learning process. What is to be measured in the learning process is related to the availability of the assessment instrument. The aim of the current research is to analyze validity, reliability, and the instrument effectiveness. This current research employed R&D method. The steps of R&D method: 1) needs analysis, 2) product design, 3) design and development, 4) expert validation, 5) preliminary product revision, 6) limited testing, 7) product revision, 8) expanded testing, 9) revision and analysis of the testing product. The data analysis technique in the current research employed product moment correlation, kappa coefficient for instrument reliability and normalized-gain test analysis for the effectiveness of instrument. The results of the pretest was 79, the posttest was 83 on limited testing, while the expanded test showed not difference of limited testing 0.3 for pretest, 0.4 for the posttest. Validity of instrument was 0.878 which indicates the instrument developed is valid, reliability of practice instrument was 0.721 which indicates in the good category and effectiveness of instruments was 0.3 that have moderate levels of effectiveness. This suggests that the assessment instrument of bridal Jogja Paes Ageng practice is standardized, valid and effective.


Author(s):  
I Gede Sudirtha

This study aims to develop a performance assessment instrument for Make up Training Subject in Beauty Education Program by appropriate validity and reliability procedure in thedevelopment of the assessment instrument as the assessment process and products. Thisresearch is a development research (R&D). The research focuses on the development ofassessment instrument for Makeup Training Subject. The aspects of research, data sources, techniques and instruments/data collection instrument, and validation and reliability of theinstrument used in the study conducted by interview, observation, and literature and documents.The data of this study is quantitative data, which was statistically analyzed due to relevant empirical testing (validation of instruments) that includes testing and content validity andinternal validity. Descriptive analyzes were undertaken to describe the research data. The results showed: 1) The design of the instrument Makeup Training Subject are developed through theneeds analysis. It is done through literature review and study of the course competencies byengaging a team of researchers. This study resulted in the instrument guidelines and assessment instrument completed with its scoring rubrics. The instrument comprising: a step of validityassessment is done through the stages: experts judgment, empirical tests to prove the validityand reliability of the instruments assessment. All the performance test instrument developed is


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document