scholarly journals Involvement of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate in Glutamate Secretion in Hippocampal Neurons

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 3429-3440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taketoshi Kajimoto ◽  
Taro Okada ◽  
Huan Yu ◽  
Sravan K. Goparaju ◽  
Saleem Jahangeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Lipid Mediator ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Sphingosine 1 Phosphate ◽  
Key Enzyme ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Interfering Rna

ABSTRACT Neuronal activity greatly influences the formation and stabilization of synapses. Although receptors for sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a lipid mediator regulating diverse cellular processes, are abundant in the central nervous system, neuron-specific functions of S1P remain largely undefined. Here, we report two novel actions of S1P using primary hippocampal neurons as a model system: (i) as a secretagogue where S1P triggers glutamate secretion and (ii) as an enhancer where S1P potentiates depolarization-evoked glutamate secretion. Sphingosine kinase 1 (SK1), a key enzyme for S1P production, was enriched in functional puncta of hippocampal neurons. Silencing SK1 expression by small interfering RNA as well as SK1 inhibition by dimethylsphingosine resulted in a strong inhibition of depolarization-evoked glutamate secretion. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis showed translocation of SK1 from cytosol to membranes at the puncta during depolarization, which resulted in subsequent accumulation of S1P within cells. Fluorescent resonance energy transfer analysis demonstrated that the S1P1 receptor at the puncta was activated during depolarization and that depolarization-induced S1P1 receptor activation was inhibited in SK1-knock-down cells. Importantly, exogenously added S1P at a nanomolar concentration by itself elicited glutamate secretion from hippocampal cells even when the Na+-channel was blocked by tetrodotoxin, suggesting that S1P acts on presynaptic membranes. Furthermore, exogenous S1P at a picomolar level potentiated depolarization-evoked secretion in the neurons. These findings indicate that S1P, through its autocrine action, facilitates glutamate secretion in hippocampal neurons both by secretagogue and enhancer actions and may be involved in mechanisms underlying regulation of synaptic transmission.

scholarly journals Genetically Encoded Sensors to Elucidate Spatial Distribution of Cellular Zinc

2009 ◽  
Vol 284 (24) ◽  
pp. 16289-16297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Dittmer ◽  
Jose G. Miranda ◽  
Jessica A. Gorski ◽  
Amy E. Palmer
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Metal Ion ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Cellular Environment ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Genetically Encoded Sensors ◽  
Enzyme Cofactors

Transition metals are essential enzyme cofactors that are required for a wide range of cellular processes. Paradoxically, whereas metal ions are essential for numerous cellular processes, they are also toxic. Therefore cells must tightly regulate metal accumulation, transport, distribution, and export. Improved tools to interrogate metal ion availability and spatial distribution within living cells would greatly advance our understanding of cellular metal homeostasis. In this work, we present genetically encoded sensors for Zn2+ based on the principle of fluorescence resonance energy transfer. We also develop methodology to calibrate the probes within the cellular environment. To identify both sources of and sinks for Zn2+, these sensors are genetically targeted to specific locations within the cell, including cytosol, plasma membrane, and mitochondria. Localized probes reveal that mitochondria contain an elevated pool of Zn2+ under resting conditions that can be released into the cytosol upon glutamate stimulation of hippocampal neurons. We also observed that Zn2+ is taken up into mitochondria following glutamate/Zn2+ treatment and that there is heterogeneity in both the magnitude and kinetics of the response. Our results suggest that mitochondria serve as a source of and a sink for Zn2+ signals under different cellular conditions.

scholarly journals Live Cell FRET Imaging Reveals Amyloid β-Peptide Oligomerization in Hippocampal Neurons

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Gao ◽  
Stefan Wennmalm ◽  
Bengt Winblad ◽  
Sophia Schedin-Weiss ◽  
Lars Tjernberg
Keyword(s):  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Amyloid Β ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Live Cell ◽  
Amyloid Β Peptide ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Concentration Dependent Manner ◽  
Late Endosomes ◽  
Aβ Oligomerization

Amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) oligomerization is believed to contribute to the neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer disease (AD). Despite decades of research, many details of Aβ oligomerization in neurons still need to be revealed. Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) is a simple but effective way to study molecular interactions. Here we use a confocal microscope with a sensitive Airyscan detector for FRET detection. By live cell FRET imaging, we detect Aβ42 oligomerization in primary neurons. The neurons were incubated with fluorescently labelled Aβ42 in the cell culture medium for 24 hours. Aβ42 were internalized and oligomerized into the lysosomes/late endosomes in a concentration-dependent manner. Both the cellular uptake and intracellular oligomerization of Aβ42 were significantly higher than for Aβ40. These findings provide a better understanding of Aβ42 oligomerization in neurons.

scholarly journals Minireview: GPCR and G Proteins: Drug Efficacy and Activation in Live Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 590-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Vilardaga ◽  
Moritz Bünemann ◽  
Timothy N. Feinstein ◽  
Nevin Lambert ◽  
Viacheslav O. Nikolaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Live Cells ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Abstract Many biochemical pathways are driven by G protein-coupled receptors, cell surface proteins that convert the binding of extracellular chemical, sensory, and mechanical stimuli into cellular signals. Their interaction with various ligands triggers receptor activation that typically couples to and activates heterotrimeric G proteins, which in turn control the propagation of secondary messenger molecules (e.g. cAMP) involved in critically important physiological processes (e.g. heart beat). Successful transfer of information from ligand binding events to intracellular signaling cascades involves a dynamic interplay between ligands, receptors, and G proteins. The development of Förster resonance energy transfer and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based methods has now permitted the kinetic analysis of initial steps involved in G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling in live cells and in systems as diverse as neurotransmitter and hormone signaling. The direct measurement of ligand efficacy at the level of the receptor by Förster resonance energy transfer is also now possible and allows intrinsic efficacies of clinical drugs to be linked with the effect of receptor polymorphisms.

scholarly journals Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Sensor for Poly-ADP-Ribose

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 5004
Author(s):  
Ekaterina O. Serebrovskaya ◽  
Nadezda M. Podvalnaya ◽  
Varvara V. Dudenkova ◽  
Anna S. Efremova ◽  
Nadya G. Gurskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Fluorescent Proteins ◽  
Fluorescent Sensor ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment ◽  
Damage Response

Poly-(ADP-ribosyl)-ation (PARylation) is a reversible post-translational modification of proteins and DNA that plays an important role in various cellular processes such as DNA damage response, replication, transcription, and cell death. Here we designed a fully genetically encoded fluorescent sensor for poly-(ADP-ribose) (PAR) based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). The WWE domain, which recognizes iso-ADP-ribose internal PAR-specific structural unit, was used as a PAR-targeting module. The sensor consisted of cyan Turquoise2 and yellow Venus fluorescent proteins, each in fusion with the WWE domain of RNF146 E3 ubiquitin ligase protein. This bipartite sensor named sPARroW (sensor for PAR relying on WWE) enabled monitoring of PAR accumulation and depletion in live mammalian cells in response to different stimuli, namely hydrogen peroxide treatment, UV irradiation and hyperthermia.

scholarly journals GPCR-dependent biasing of GIRK channel signaling dynamics by RGS6 in mouse sinoatrial nodal cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (25) ◽  
pp. 14522-14531
Author(s):  
Allison Anderson ◽  
Ikuo Masuho ◽  
Ezequiel Marron Fernandez de Velasco ◽  
Atsushi Nakano ◽  
Lutz Birnbaumer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Coupling Efficiency ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Cardiac Pacemaker ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Protein Isoforms ◽  
Minimal Impact ◽  
Signaling Dynamics ◽  
The Impact

How G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) evoke specific biological outcomes while utilizing a limited array of G proteins and effectors is poorly understood, particularly in native cell systems. Here, we examined signaling evoked by muscarinic (M2R) and adenosine (A1R) receptor activation in the mouse sinoatrial node (SAN), the cardiac pacemaker. M2R and A1R activate a shared pool of cardiac G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+(GIRK) channels in SAN cells from adult mice, but A1R-GIRK responses are smaller and slower than M2R-GIRK responses. Recordings from mice lacking Regulator of G protein Signaling 6 (RGS6) revealed that RGS6 exerts a GPCR-dependent influence on GIRK-dependent signaling in SAN cells, suppressing M2R-GIRK coupling efficiency and kinetics and A1R-GIRK signaling amplitude. Fast kinetic bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays in transfected HEK cells showed that RGS6 prefers Gαoover Gαias a substrate for its catalytic activity and that M2R signals preferentially via Gαo, while A1R does not discriminate between inhibitory G protein isoforms. The impact of atrial/SAN-selective ablation of Gαoor Gαi2was consistent with these findings. Gαi2ablation had minimal impact on M2R-GIRK and A1R-GIRK signaling in SAN cells. In contrast, Gαoablation decreased the amplitude and slowed the kinetics of M2R-GIRK responses, while enhancing the sensitivity and prolonging the deactivation rate of A1R-GIRK signaling. Collectively, our data show that differences in GPCR-G protein coupling preferences, and the Gαosubstrate preference of RGS6, shape A1R- and M2R-GIRK signaling dynamics in mouse SAN cells.

scholarly journals The TP53INP2 Protein Is Required for Autophagy in Mammalian Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 870-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Nowak ◽  
Cendrine Archange ◽  
Joël Tardivel-Lacombe ◽  
Pierre Pontarotti ◽  
Marie-Josèphe Pébusque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Homo Sapiens ◽  
Transmembrane Protein ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Interfering Rna ◽  
Bioinformatic Approach ◽  
Hybrid Screening

Using a bioinformatic approach, we identified a TP53INP1-related gene encoding a protein with 30% identity with tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1 (TP53INP1), which was named TP53INP2. TP53INP1 and TP53INP2 sequences were found in several species ranging from Homo sapiens to Drosophila melanogaster, but orthologues were found neither in earlier eukaryotes nor in prokaryotes. To gain insight into the function of the TP53INP2 protein, we carried out a yeast two-hybrid screening that showed that TP53INP2 binds to the LC3-related proteins GABARAP and GABARAP-like2, and then we demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation that TP53INP2 interacts with these proteins, as well as with LC3 and with the autophagosome transmembrane protein VMP1. TP53INP2 translocates from the nucleus to the autophagosome structures after activation of autophagy by rapamycin or starvation. Also, we showed that TP53INP2 expression is necessary for autophagosome development because its small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown strongly decreases sensitivity of mammalian cells to autophagy. Finally, we found that interactions between TP53INP2 and LC3 or the LC3-related proteins GABARAP and GABARAP-like2 require autophagy and are modulated by wortmannin as judged by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays. We suggest that TP53INP2 is a scaffold protein that recruits LC3 and/or LC3-related proteins to the autophagosome membrane by interacting with the transmembrane protein VMP1. It is concluded that TP53INP2 is a novel gene involved in the autophagy of mammalian cells.

scholarly journals δ-Catenin/NPRAP (neural plakophilin-related armadillo repeat protein) interacts with and activates sphingosine kinase 1

2004 ◽  
Vol 382 (2) ◽  
pp. 717-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshitada FUJITA ◽  
Taro OKADA ◽  
Shun HAYASHI ◽  
Saleem JAHANGEER ◽  
Noriko MIWA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Motility ◽  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Mdck Cells ◽  
Specific Inhibitor ◽  
Sphingosine Kinase ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Repeat Protein ◽  
Sphingosine 1 Phosphate ◽  
Key Enzyme ◽  
Armadillo Repeat

Sphingosine kinase (SPHK) is a key enzyme catalysing the formation of sphingosine 1-phosphate (SPP), a lipid messenger that is implicated in the regulation of a wide variety of important cellular events acting through intracellular, as well as extracellular, mechanisms. However, the molecular mechanism of intracellular actions of SPP remains unclear. Here, we have identified δ-catenin/NPRAP (neural plakophilin-related armadillo repeat protein) as a potential binding partner for SPHK1 by yeast two-hybrid screening. From co-immunoprecipitation analyses, the C-terminal portion of δ-catenin/NPRAP containing the seventh to tenth armadillo repeats was found to be required for interaction with SPHK1. Endogenous δ-catenin/NPRAP was co-localized with endogenous SPHK1 and transfected δ-catenin/NPRAP was co-localized with transfected SPHK1 in dissociated rat hippocampal neurons. MDCK (Madin–Darby canine kidney) cells stably expressing δ-catenin/NPRAP contained elevated levels of intracellular SPP. In a purified system δ-catenin/NPRAP stimulated SPHK1 in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, δ-catenin/NPRAP-induced increased cell motility in MDCK cells was completely inhibited by dimethylsphingosine, a specific inhibitor of SPHK1. These results strongly suggest that at least some of δ-catenin/NPRAP functions, including increased cell motility, are mediated by an SPHK–SPP signalling pathway.

scholarly journals Muscarinic receptors stimulate AC2 by novel phosphorylation sites, whereas Gβγ subunits exert opposing effects depending on the G-protein source

2012 ◽  
Vol 447 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia X. Shen ◽  
Sebastian Wachten ◽  
Michelle L. Halls ◽  
Katy L. Everett ◽  
Dermot M. F. Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Muscarinic Receptor ◽  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Phosphorylation Sites ◽  
Canonical Pathways ◽  
Pkc Protein Kinase C ◽  
Opposite Manner ◽  
Opposing Effects

Direct phosphorylation of AC2 (adenylyl cyclase 2) by PKC (protein kinase C) affords an opportunity for AC2 to integrate signals from non-canonical pathways to produce the second messenger, cyclic AMP. The present study shows that stimulation of AC2 by pharmacological activation of PKC or muscarinic receptor activation is primarily the result of phosphorylation of Ser490 and Ser543, as opposed to the previously proposed Thr1057. A double phosphorylation-deficient mutant (S490/543A) of AC2 was insensitive to PMA (phorbol myristic acid) and CCh (carbachol) stimulation, whereas a double phosphomimetic mutant (S490/543D) mimicked the activity of PKC-activated AC2. Putative Gβγ-interacting sites are in the immediate environment of these PKC phosphorylation sites (Ser490 and Ser543) that are located within the C1b domain of AC2, suggesting a significant regulatory importance of this domain. Consequently, we examined the effect of both Gq-coupled muscarinic and Gi-coupled somatostatin receptors. Employing pharmacological and FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer)-based real-time single cell imaging approaches, we found that Gβγ released from the Gq-coupled muscarinic receptor or Gi-coupled somatostatin receptors exert inhibitory or stimulatory effects respectively. These results underline the sophisticated regulatory capacities of AC2, in not only being subject to regulation by PKC, but also and in an opposite manner to Gβγ subunits, depending on their source.

Mapping the Protease Activated Receptor 4 (PAR4) Homodimer Interface.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 773-773
Author(s):  
Marvin T Nieman
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Intracellular Loop ◽  
Concentration Dependent Manner ◽  
Platelet Surface

Abstract Abstract 773 Thrombin activates platelets by binding and cleaving protease activated receptors 1 and 4 (PAR1 and PAR4). PAR1 and PAR4 communicate with each other to lower the concentration of thrombin required for PAR4 activation (Nieman Biochemistry, 2008). In addition, PAR1 and PAR4 form homo and heterodimers. However, where these receptors interact has not been defined and it is not known if dimerization influences receptor activation, downstream signaling, or both. Since PAR4 activation is important on human and mouse platelets, we sought to characterize the interaction site between PAR4 homodimers. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), we mapped the PAR4 homodimer interface. The PAR4 homodimers show a specific interaction as indicated by a hyperbolic BRET signal in response to increasing PAR4-GFP expression with a fixed concentration of PAR4-Rluc. The threshold maximum BRET signal was disrupted in a concentration-dependent manner by unlabeled PAR4. In contrast, the unrelated G-protein coupled receptor, rhodopsin, was unable to disrupt the BRET signal indicating that the disruption of the PAR4 homodimer is a specific interaction. We have mapped the region required for PAR4 homodimer formation using chimeras between rhodopsin and PAR4. PAR4 does not interact with rhodopsin in BRET assays. Using a library of rho-PAR4 chimeras that have the junction at the beginning of transmembrane (TM) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7, we determined where dimer formation is restored. When the junction is placed at the beginning of TM4 or TM5, the chimera does not interact with PAR4-WT. In contrast, when the junction is moved to the end of TM2, the BRET signal is restored. These results indicate that the region on PAR4 required for homodimer formation encompasses a 63 amino acid region that includes the first extracellular loop, TM3 and the second intracellular loop. These studies establish techniques that may be used to define the interactions between other GPCRs found on the platelet surface. These receptor-receptor interactions may be another level of regulation of agonist activity and platelet function in vivo and may provide novel targets for anti-platelet therapies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Thrombin Modulates PAR1-PAR4 Heterodimers

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2203-2203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria de la Fuente ◽  
Amal Arachiche ◽  
Marvin T. Nieman
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Transmembrane Helix ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Signaling Specificity ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
The Stability

Abstract Abstract 2203 Thrombin is a potent platelet agonist. Thrombin activates platelets and other cells of the cardiovascular system by cleaving its receptors, protease activated receptor 1 (PAR1), PAR4 or both. PARs are G-protein coupled receptors that activate cellular signaling through Gq and G12/13. There is structural evidence that GPCRs, as a class, function as dimers and that dimerization can alter signaling specificity. Our previous studies have determined that PAR4 forms homodimers and have mapped the homodimer interface to transmembrane helix 4 (TM4). We have also shown that coexpression of PAR1 with PAR4 lowers the threshold for PAR4 activation by thrombin ∼10-fold. The purpose of the current study is to examine the physical interaction between PAR1 and PAR4 and how these interactions influence PAR1's ability to enhance PAR4 activation. The PAR1-PAR4 heterodimers were examined by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC). Similar to our previous studies with PAR4 homodimers, PAR1 homodimers were constitutive and did not require receptor activation. In contrast, PAR1-PAR4 heterodimers were not detected under basal conditions. However, when the cells were stimulated with 10 nM thrombin, we were able to detect a strong interaction between PAR1 and PAR4. We next examined if PAR1-PAR4 heterodimers would be induced by stimulating PAR1 or PAR4 individually with their agonist peptides TFLLRN (100 μM) or AYPGKF (500 μM), respectively. The agonist peptides were unable to induce heterodimers when added to the cells individually or simultaneously. These data demonstrate that PAR1 and PAR4 require allosteric changes induced by receptor cleavage by thrombin to mediate heterodimer formation. To examine this further, we removed 37 amino acids from the C-terminus of PAR1, which disrupts the eighth helix. The truncated PAR1 was able to form constitutive heterodimers with PAR4 and these heterodimers were unaffected by thrombin. These data suggest that PAR1 is the allosteric modulator of the PAR1-PAR4 heterodimers. Finally, the stability of the constitutive PAR1 and PAR4 homodimers was unchanged in response to thrombin or the agonist peptides. Taken together, these data suggest that PAR1 and PAR4 have a dynamic interaction depending on the context of their expression. Since PAR1 is an attractive antiplatelet target, the molecular interactions of this receptor on the cells surface must be taken into account when developing and characterizing these antagonists. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document