SAT0416 ENTHESITIS AND CLINICAL RESPONSE IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: REAL-LIFE DATA

Background:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis that is characterized by a broad spectrum of clinical conditions, including axial skeletal involvement, enthesitis, dactylitis, uveitis and arthritis. Among those, enthesitis, the inflammation of the junction where the tendon, ligament or joint capsule inserts into the bone, is assigned to be the hallmark, affecting 35–50% of patients. Several clinical methods have been developed to measure it, including The Maastricht AS Enthesitis Score (MASES) index, which tests 13 entheses and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) index that assesses 16.Objectives:To assess the relationship between enthesitis and clinical response in psoriatic arthritis.Methods:Retrospective study including all the patients with PsA meeting the CASPAR criteria, beginning first-line biologic therapy at our centre. Demographic and clinical data including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, physical examination findings such as presence of enthesitis, dactylitis, chronic back pain, tender and swollen joint counts (TJC/ SJC), ESR, CRP, DAS 28 4vESR, BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, ASDAS, HAQ, patient VAS score, MASES and SPARCC were collected from the Portuguese database Reumapt. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. Continuous variables were analysed through Spearman correlations.Results:We included 119 patients with PsA (60 female), of which 14.9% were active smokers. The mean age of patients was 46.3 ± 1.03 years. The median disease duration was 6.8 (0.3-33.8) years and the mean BMI was 26.8 ± 0.5 Kg/m2.Enthesitis, dactylitis, inflammatory back pain, peripheral arthritis, ungueal distrophy, and psoriasis were present in 53 (45.7%), 45 (38.8%), 76 (65.5%), 109 (94%), 45 (38.8%), 104 (89.7%) patients, respectively.At baseline, mean (SD) disease activity parameters were: DAS 28 4vESR 4.9 (0.2), ESR 33.2 (2.3) mm/h; CRP 2.35 (0.3) mg/dL, HAQ 1.3 (0.1), BASDAI 6.6 (0.2), ASDAS 3.9 (0.1), BASMI 3.7 (0.2), BASFI 5.8 (0.3), MASES 1.9 (0.3), SPARCC 2.3 (0.3). Median (min-max) values of TJC, SJC and patient VAS score at baseline were 4 (0-28), 3 (0-19), 76 (0-100), respectively.There were statistically significant positive correlations (0-12 months) between ΔMASES and ΔDAS 28 4vESR (p=0.02, rho=0.432), Δpatient VAS score (p=0.027, rho=0.307), ΔHAQ (p=0.02, rho=0.411), ΔBASDAI (p=0.025, rho=0.326), ΔBASFI (p=0.037, rho=0.315), ΔASDAS (p=0.023, rho= 0.331). Correlations between ΔSPARCC and ΔDAS 28 4vESR (p=0.023, rho=0.332), Δpatient VAS score (p=0.003, rho=0.402), ΔHAQ (p=0.012, rho=0.440), ΔBASDAI (p=0.011, rho=0.368), ΔBASFI (p=0.001, rho=0.445), ΔASDAS (p=0.002, rho= 0.437), ΔCDAI (p=0.039, rho=0.320) and ΔSDAI (p=0.039, rho=0.319), were also significant. However, there weren’t strong correlations between ΔMASES neither ΔSPARCC and PsARC response at 12 months.Conclusion:Our results suggest that enthesitis is correlated with clinical response in PsA, supporting the idea that it is a major determinant of disease activity. It should be given more importance, namely by incorporating it in daily clinical practice, due to its major role, both in establishing an early diagnosis and in assessing treatment response.References:[1]Sunar I, Ataman S, Nas K, Kilic E, Sargin B, Kasman SA, et al. Enthesitis and its relationship with disease activity, functional status, and quality of life in psoriatic arthritis: a multi‑center study. Rheumatol Int. 2019 Nov 26. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04480-9.Disclosure of Interests:Sara Ganhão: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Eva Mariz: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared

Download Full-text

AB0769 THE IMPACT OF BODY MASS INDEX ON DISEASE ACTIVITY AND ENTHESITIS IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.4567 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1682.2-1683

Author(s):

S. Ganhão ◽

B. M. Fernandes ◽

S. Garcia ◽

F. Pinheiro ◽

M. Rato ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Body Mass Index ◽

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Body Mass ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Public Health Problem ◽

Continuous Variables ◽

Das 28 ◽

The Mean ◽

The Impact

Background:Overweight/obesity has increased exponentially in the last decades, becoming a huge Public Health problem. Moreover, an increase in adipose tissue is associated with an increased production of several proinflammatory cytokines and acute phase reactants. Higher BMI has been related with new bone formation including syndesmophytes and enthesophytes. In fact, besides rheumatologic conditions including Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), enthesopathy can be a consequence of several clinical conditions including metabolic syndrome, mechanical injuries and degeneration.Objectives:To evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on disease activity scores and enthesitis scores in Psoriatic Arthritis.Methods:Retrospective study including all the patients with PsA meeting the CASPAR criteria, beginning first-line biologic therapy at our centre. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the Portuguese database Reumapt. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. Continuous variables were compared through Spearman/Pearson correlations.Results:The mean BMI was 26.8 (SD 0.5). In our sample of 119 PsA patients, 21.5% were overweight and 8.3% were obese. The mean age of patients was 46.3 ± 1.03 years; 60 female and 59 male. The median disease duration was 6.8 (0.3-33.8) years. At baseline mean (SD) disease activity variables were: DAS 28 4vESR 4.9 (0.2), ESR 33.2 (2.3) mm/h; CRP 2.35 (0.3) mg/dL, BASDAI 6.6 (0.2), ASDAS 3.9 (0.1), BASMI 3.7 (0.2), BASFI 5.8 (0.3), MASES 1.9 (0.3), SPARCC 2.3 (0.3). There were statistically significant positive correlations between BMI and MASES at baseline (p=0.024, r=0.411) but there weren’t with SPARCC, DAS 28 4vESR, ESR, CRP, BASDAI, ASDAS, BASMI and BASFI.Conclusion:The data showed that patients with higher BMI values had higher enthesitis scores suggesting that overweight/obesity may have a negative impact on enthesopathy. Further studies are still needed to further understand that possible relationship.References:[1]Bakirci S, Dabague J, Eder L, McGonagle D, Aydin SZ. The role of obesity on inflammation and damage in spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review on body mass index and imaging. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Apr 29.Disclosure of Interests:Sara Ganhão: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Eva Mariz: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared

Download Full-text

POS0733 REAL-LIFE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN SLE PATIENTS: ASSOCIATIONS WITH FATIGUE AND QUALITY OF SLEEP

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.1775 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 617.1-617

Author(s):

H. Wohland ◽

N. Leuchten ◽

M. Aringer

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

Sleep Quality ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Real Life ◽

Survey Study ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Fatigue Score ◽

The Mean

Background:Fatigue is among the top complaints of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but only in part associated with SLE disease activity. Physical activity can help to reduce fatigue and should therefore be recommended to SLE patients. Vice versa, fatigue may arguably lead to reduced physical activity.Objectives:To investigate the extent of physical activity and the perception of fatigue and sleep quality in patients with SLE.Methods:Starting in February 2019, SLE patients were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey study of fatigue and physical exercise during their routine outpatient clinic visits. Participants filled out a ten-page paper questionnaire focused on physical activity. To evaluate fatigue, we primarily used a 10 cm visual analogue scale (0-100 mm, with 100 meaning most fatigued), but also the FACIT fatigue score (range 0-52). Sleep quality was estimated using grades from 1 (excellent) to 6 (extremely poor).Results:93 SLE patients took part in the study. All patients fulfilled the European League Against Rheumatism/ American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) 2019 classification criteria for SLE. 91% of the patients were female. Their mean (SD) age was 45.5 (14.3) years and their mean disease duration 12.1 (9.4) years. The mean BMI was 25.2 (5.6). Of all patients, 7.5% had a diagnosis of (secondary) fibromyalgia. The mean fatigue VAS was 32 (27) mm and the mean FACIT fatigue score 35.7 (10.3). As expected, fatigue by VAS and FACIT was correlated (Spearman r=-0.61, p<0.0001). The mean SLEDAI was 1 (1) with a range of 0 to 6. Median glucocorticoid doses were 2 mg prednisolone equivalent, with a range from 0 to 10 mg.Out of 66 patients in payed jobs, 64 (97%) reported details on their working space. One person (2%) worked in a predominanty standing position, 37 (58%) worked in essentially sedentary jobs and 26 (40%) were in positions where they were mildly physically active in part. The mean fatigue VAS was 31 (24) mm for patients with partly active jobs and 27 (30) mm for those in sedentary jobs. Sleep was graded 2.9 (0.9) by those with active and 3.1 (1.3) by those with sedentary jobs.Half of the patients (51%) reported more than one physical recreational activity. 44 (47%) were walking and for five persons (5%) this was the only form of activity. Cycling was reported by 19 patients (20%), 18 of whom also practiced other activities. For transport, 52 (56%) in part chose active modes, such as walking and cycling. Patients who reported any of the above activities showed a mean fatigue VAS of 28 (25) mm, compared to 36 (28) mm in the patient group without a reported activity. Sleep quality was very similar: 3.1 (1.2) and 3.2 (1.1) for more active and more passive patients, respectively.65 (70%) patients regularly practiced sports. Of these, 39 (60%) practiced one kind of sport, 15 (23%) two, 7 (11%) three, and 2 (3%) each four and five kinds of sports. Fatigue VAS of patients practicing sports was 27 (25) mm versus 43 (28) in those who did not (p=0.0075). Sleep quality was 2.9 (1.1) in the sports cohort and 3.5 (1.1) in the no-sports cohort (p=0.0244).Conclusion:A majority of SLE patients in remission or low to moderate disease activity regularly practiced sports, and those doing so reported lesser fatigue and better sleep quality. The absolute values on the fatigue VAS were in a moderate range that made fatigue as the main cause of not performing sports rather unlikely for most patients.Disclosure of Interests:Helena Wohland: None declared, Nicolai Leuchten Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Martin Aringer Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Gilead, GSK, HEXAL, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Lilly, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, UCB

Download Full-text

AB0330 HIGH REMISSION RATES IN RA – REAL LIFE DATA FROM BARITICINIB

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.5263 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1463.2-1464

Author(s):

S. Bayat ◽

K. Tascilar ◽

V. Kaufmann ◽

A. Kleyer ◽

D. Simon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Real Life ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Research Support ◽

Das 28 ◽

Patient Reported ◽

One Year

Background:Recent developments of targeted treatments such as targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) increase the chances of a sustained low disease activity (LDA) or remission state for patients suffering rheumatoid arthritis (RA). tsDMARDs such as baricitinib, an oral inhibitor of the Janus Kinases (JAK1/JAK2) was recently approved for the treatment of RA with an inadequate response to conventional (cDMARD) and biological (bDMARD) therapy. (1, 2).Objectives:Aim of this study is to analyze the effect of baricitinb on disease activity (DAS28, LDA) in patients with RA in real life, to analyze drug persistance and associate these effects with various baseline characteristics.Methods:All RA patients were seen in our outpatient clinic. If a patient was switched to a baricitinib due to medical reasons, these patients were included in our prospective, observational study which started in April 2017. Clinical scores (SJC/TJC 76/78), composite scores (DAS28), PROs (HAQ-DI; RAID; FACIT), safety parameters (not reported in this abstract) as well as laboratory biomarkers were collected at each visit every three months. Linear mixed effects models for repeated measurements were used to analyze the time course of disease activity, patient reported outcomes and laboratory results. We estimated the probabilities of continued baricitinib treatment and the probabilities of LDA and remission by DAS-28 as well as Boolean remission up to one year using survival analysis and explored their association with disease characteristics using multivariable Cox regression. All patients gave informed consent. The study is approved by the local ethics.Results:95 patients were included and 85 analyzed with available follow-up data until November 2019. Demographics are shown in table 1. Mean follow-up duration after starting baricitinib was 49.3 (28.9) weeks. 51 patients (60%) were on monotherapy. Baricitinib survival (95%CI) was 82% (73% to 91%) at one year. Cumulative number (%probability, 95%CI) of patients that attained DAS-28 LDA at least once up to one year was 67 (92%, 80% to 97%) and the number of patients attaining DAS-28 and Boolean remission were 31 (50%, 34% to 61%) and 12(20%, 9% to 30%) respectively. Median time to DAS-28 LDA was 16 weeks (Figure 1). Cox regression analyses did not show any sufficiently precise association of remission or LDA with age, gender, seropositivity, disease duration, concomitant DMARD use and number of previous bDMARDs. Increasing number of previous bDMARDs was associated with poor baricitinib survival (HR=1.5, 95%CI 1.1 to 2.2) while this association was not robust to adjustment for baseline disease activity. Favorable changes were observed in tender and swollen joint counts, pain-VAS, patient and physician disease assessment scores, RAID, FACIT and the acute phase response.Conclusion:In this prospective observational study, we observed high rates of LDA and DAS-28 remission and significant improvements in disease activity and patient reported outcome measurements over time.References:[1]Keystone EC, Taylor PC, Drescher E, Schlichting DE, Beattie SD, Berclaz PY, et al. Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2015 Feb;74(2):333-40.[2]Genovese MC, Kremer J, Zamani O, Ludivico C, Krogulec M, Xie L, et al. Baricitinib in Patients with Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis. The New England journal of medicine. 2016 Mar 31;374(13):1243-52.Figure 1.Cumulative probability of low disease activity or remission under treatment with baricitinib.Disclosure of Interests:Sara Bayat Speakers bureau: Novartis, Koray Tascilar: None declared, Veronica Kaufmann: None declared, Arnd Kleyer Consultant of: Lilly, Gilead, Novartis,Abbvie, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Lilly, David Simon Grant/research support from: Else Kröner-Memorial Scholarship, Novartis, Consultant of: Novartis, Lilly, Johannes Knitza Grant/research support from: Research Grant: Novartis, Fabian Hartmann: None declared, Susanne Adam: None declared, Axel Hueber Grant/research support from: Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, EIT Health, EU-IMI, DFG, Universität Erlangen (EFI), Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Speakers bureau: GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Georg Schett Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche and UCB

Download Full-text

Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in 608 patients with psoriatic arthritis in real life: a 24-month prospective, multicentre study

RMD Open ◽

10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001519 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. e001519

Author(s):

Roberta Ramonda ◽

Mariagrazia Lorenzin ◽

Antonio Carriero ◽

Maria Sole Chimenti ◽

Raffaele Scarpa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Biological Treatment ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Real Life ◽

Drug Retention ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Drug Retention Rate

ObjectivesTo evaluate in a multicentric Italian cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on secukinumab followed for 24 months: (1) the long-term effectiveness and safety of secukinumab, (2) the drug retention rate and minimal disease activity (MDA), (3) diﬀerences in the outcomes according to the biological treatment line: biologic-naïve patients (group A) versus multifailure (group B) patients.MethodsConsecutive patients with PsA receiving secukinumab were evaluated prospectively. Disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities and follow-up duration were collected. Disease activity/functional/clinimetric scores and biochemical values were recorded at baseline (T0), 6(T6), 12(T12) and 24(T24) months. Effectiveness was evaluated overtime with descriptive statistics; multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of drug-discontinuation and MDA at T6. Infections and adverse events were recorded.Results608 patients (41.28% men; mean (SD) age 52.78 (11.33)) were enrolled; secukinumab was prescribed as first-line biological treatment in 227 (37.34%) patients, as second (or more)-line biological treatment in 381 (62.66%). Effectiveness of secukinumab was shown with an improvement in several outcomes, such as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (T0=3.26 (0.88) vs T24=1.60 (0.69) ;p=0.02) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (T0=25.29 (11.14) vs T24=7.69 (4.51); p<0.01). At T24, group A showed lower Psoriasis Area Severity Index (p=0.04), erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein (p=0.03 ;p=0.05) and joint count (p=0.03) compared with group B. At T24, MDA was achieved in 75.71% of group A and 70.37% of group B. Treatment was discontinued in 123 (20.23%) patients, mainly due to primary/secondary loss of effectiveness, and in 22 due to adverse events. Retention rate at T24 was 71% in the whole population, with some difference depending on secukinumab dosage (p=0.004) and gender (p=0.05).ConclusionsIn a real-life clinical setting, secukimumab proved safe and effective in all PsA domains, with notable drug retention rate.

Download Full-text

AB0104 CONCORDANCE BETWEEN THE PHYSICIAN’S AND THE PATIENT’S ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE ACTIVITY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: RESULTS OF THE AUTODAS-MEAC STUDY AT ONE YEAR

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.646 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1080-1080

Author(s):

N. Ziade ◽

S. Al Emadi ◽

M. Abu Jbara ◽

S. Saad ◽

L. Kibbi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Middle Eastern ◽

Weighted Kappa ◽

Arab Countries ◽

Das 28 ◽

The Mean ◽

One Year ◽

Middle Eastern Arab ◽

Assessment Of Disease Activity

Background:Involving the patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the assessment of their disease may increase their adherence to treatment, improve the disease outcomes and facilitate the application of telehealth. We previously reported an excellent concordance between the Disease Activity Score (DAS-28) performed by physicians and patients at the baseline visit of this prospective study (1).Objectives:To evaluate the persistence of the concordance between the physician’ and the patient’s assessment of disease activity in RA using DAS-28 after one year.Methods:At the baseline visit, patients with RA from 7 Middle Eastern Arab Countries (MEAC) were briefed about DAS-28 by their rheumatologist during a routine consultation and given smartphone access to a video in Arabic language explaining the performance of DAS-28. At 3, 6 and 12 months (± 3 months), the patients were asked to self-report DAS-28, blinded to the physician’s assessment. Concordance between the continuous DAS-28 at each visit was calculated using paired t-test numerically and the Bland-Altman method graphically. Agreement between physician- and patient-DAS categories (remission, low-, moderate- and high disease activity) was calculated at each visit using weighted kappa for category comparison. Weighted kappa of the different agreements were compared over time using their respective confidence intervals (CIs). Predictive factors of positive concordance between physician and patient-DAS were identified using binary logistic regression.Results:The study included 428 patients over a period of three years (2018 to 2020). The mean age of participants was 49.8 years, 82.5% were females, 44.3% had a university degree and the mean disease duration was 11.4 years.At baseline, the average patient-DAS was higher (4.06 (±1.52)) than the physician-DAS (3.97 (±1.52)). The mean difference was -0.09 [95%CI -0.14; -0.04] and most of the pairs were within the limit of agreement in the Bland-Altman graph, indicating a good concordance, particularly in cases of remission.During the study follow-up, 299 patients consulted for visit 2 (69.9% of the total population), 232 for visit 3 (54.2%) and 199 for visit 4 (46.5%). The weighted kappa was 0.80 [95%CI 0.76;0.85] at visit 1 and 0.79 [95%CI 0.72;0.88] at visit 4 (Figure 1 showing kappa for DAS-28, CDAI and SDAI as well). A minor numerical decrease in kappa was observed over time; however, the CIs were overlapping over the four visits and the agreement was considered stable, remaining in the excellent range. At visit 4, a positive concordance between the physician- and the patient-DAS was associated with the profession (lower in blue collar, p=0.001), the educational level (higher in high school and university, p=0.034) and the baseline physician’s DAS (higher in high disease activity, p=0.46).Conclusion:The agreement between the DAS-28 performed by the physician and by the patient was excellent at baseline and remained stable over one year. A positive concordance was associated with the profession, the educational level and the level of disease activity. The present study can help the rheumatologist make informed decisions about the patients who may be suitable for a remote evaluation of their disease activity, that can be of particular interest in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.References:[1]Ziade N, Saad S, al Mashaleh M, et al. Perceptions of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis about Self-Assessment of Disease Activity after Watching an Educational Video: Qualitative Pilot Results from the Auto-DAS in Middle Eastern Arab Countries Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 10).Acknowledgements:The authors would like to acknowledge the patients for participating in the study and the assistants/ students/ nurses who assisted in the data collection: Dr. Fatima Abdul Majeed Al Hawaj, M. Atef Ahmed, M. Mohammad Alhusamiah, Ms Raquel De Guzman, Ms Lina Razzouk.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

AB0747 SPECIFIC ULTRASOUND LESIONS IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: PREVALENCE AND CORRELATION WITH DISEASE ACTIVITY

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.4839 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1670.2-1670

Author(s):

K. Ben Abdelghani ◽

H. Boussaa ◽

S. Miladi ◽

A. Fazaa ◽

K. Ouenniche ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Disease Duration ◽

Extensor Tendon ◽

Biological Data ◽

Dorsal Aspect ◽

Tissue Edema ◽

Linear Probe ◽

The Mean

Background:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a systemic inflammatory disease with articular and extra-articular features. In recent years, Ultrasonography (US) is playing an important role in the diagnosis and monitoring of this disease. Specific US features of PsA have been reported such as enthesitis, peritenon extensor tendon inflammation (PTI) and soft tissue edema.Objectives:The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of these US signs in PsA patients and to determine their association with disease duration and activity.Methods:Patients with peripheral PsA responding to the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) were enrolled. Clinical and biological data were extracted, and then US examination was performed by an experimented rheumatologist blinded to clinical data using a machine type Esaote MyLAb 60 with a linear probe of 6-18 MHz. The following US features were evaluated: PTI at the dorsal aspect of metacarpo-phalangeal (MCP) joints, soft edema at the volar aspect of MCP joints and enthesitis of the digitorum extensor at the dorsal aspect of distal inter-phalangeal (DIP) joints.A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:We included twenty PsA patients, 8 men and 12 women, with a mean age of 55 ± 11 [33-77] years old. The mean disease duration was of 10±8 [1-34] years. A family history of PsA or psoriasis was reported in 53% of cases.Oral corticosteroids were used in 21% of patients, at a mean daily posology of 7 mg [5-10] of Prednisone equivalent, Methotrexate in 84% of cases at a mean posology of 15 mg [10-20] per week, Sulfasalazine in 10% of cases and a biological DMARD in 32% of cases (Etanercept=4, Infliximab=1, Adalimumab=1).The mean number of tender and swollen joints were respectively of 8 [0-16] and 2 [0-8]. The mean rate of patient global evaluation and visual analogue scale was of 5 [0-9].The mean DAPSA (Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis) score was of 32±27 [4-112].US examination demonstrated that all patients had at least one of the three specific signs that we were looking for. At MCP level, PTI was noted in 11% of joints with Power Doppler (PD) signal in one case and soft tissue edema was noted in 3% of joints.At DIP level, enthesitis of digitorum extensor tendon was noted in 39% of joints. The elementary lesions reported were: enthesophyte in 25%, erosion in 8%, calcification in 5% and thickened or hypoecoic tendon in 4% of joints. However, no PD signal was detected at the enthesis.A positive association was found between DAPSA score and soft tissue edema (p=0.000), but not with PTI (0.668) and enthesitis (0.137). No relation was found between these three lesions and the disease duration.Conclusion:The presence of soft tissue edema, enthesitis and/or PTI on US can be an argument for the diagnosis of PsA. Soft tissue edema is shown to be associated with disease activity.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

Detectability of the peripheral and axial manifestations of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis in dermatological practice

Modern Rheumatology Journal ◽

10.14412/1996-7012-2019-4-48-54 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 13 (4) ◽

pp. 48-54

Author(s):

M. N. Chamurlieva ◽

E. Yu. Loginova ◽

T. V. Korotaeva

Keyword(s):

Back Pain ◽

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Early Diagnosis ◽

Clinical Signs ◽

Severity Index ◽

The Body ◽

Inflammatory Back Pain ◽

Patient Complaints ◽

Asas Criteria ◽

Mechanical Back Pain

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous disease manifested by peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, spondylitis, and enthesitis. PsA is often undiagnosed by dermatovenerologists because of the difficulty in identifying a variety of clinical signs. The early diagnosis of PsA and the accurate assessment of all its symptoms are necessary for the timely choice of optimal therapy.Objective: to assess the detectability of clinical signs of PsA in patients with psoriasis in dermatological practice.Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled 103 patients (47 men and 56 women) (mean age, 44.0±13.7 years) with psoriasis (its mean duration, 10.7±10.2 years), the average prevalence and severity according to the Body Surface Area (BSA) and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were 9.3±13.6% and 15.4±12.5 scores, respectively. All the patients completed the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (mPEST) and were examined by a dermatovenerologist and a rheumatologist. The diagnosis of PsA was based on the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR). The investigators evaluated arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis, and inflammatory back pain (IBP) according to the rheumatological standards: IBP by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria, and enthesitis by the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI).Results and discussion. Sixty-one (59.2%) of the 103 patients with psoriasis were found to have PsA on the basis of the CASPAR criteria and the rheumatologist's examination. The dermatovenerologist diagnosed arthritis in a significantly smaller number of cases than did the rheumatologist: in 15 (24.6%) and 35 (57.4%) of the 61 patients (p<0.001), respectively. The dermatovenerologist and the rheumatologist demonstrated no significant differences in their clinical evaluation of dactylitis: it was detected in 37 (60.7%) and 40 (65.6%) of the 61 patients, respectively (p=0.32). Based on patient complaints and mPEST findings, the dermatovenerologist recorded pain in the calcaneal region in 32 (52.5%) patients. The rheumatologist identified ulnar, knee, and calcaneus enthesitis in 11 (18%), 8 (13.1%), and 25 (41%) patients, respectively. Based on complaints and mPEST findings, the dermatovenerologist detected back pain in 30 (49.2%) of the 61 patients. The rheumatologist diagnosed IBP in 21 (70%) of these 30 patients and mechanical back pain in 9 (30%). Thus, IBP was noted in 34.4% of PsA patients. Tendonitis was undiagnosed by the dermatovenerologist; the rheumatologist identified wrist tendonitis in 13 (21.3%) of the 61 patients with PsA.Conclusion. Dermatovenerologists frequently underestimate damage to the spine and entheses in patients with psoriasis. The introduction of the ASAS criteria for IBP and methods for assessing enthesitis in dermatological practice can improve the early diagnosis of axial lesion in PsA in patients with psoriasis.

Download Full-text

Early and sustained efficacy with apremilast monotherapy in biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: a phase IIIB, randomised controlled trial (ACTIVE)

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211568 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 77 (5) ◽

pp. 690-698 ◽

Cited By ~ 36

Author(s):

Peter Nash ◽

Kamal Ohson ◽

Jessica Walsh ◽

Nikolay Delev ◽

Dianne Nguyen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Tender Joint ◽

American College Of Rheumatology ◽

Das 28 ◽

Registration Number ◽

Randomised Controlled

ObjectiveEvaluate apremilast efficacy across various psoriatic arthritis (PsA) manifestations beginning at week 2 in biological-naïve patients with PsA.MethodsPatients were randomised (1:1) to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo. At week 16, patients whose swollen and tender joint counts had not improved by ≥10% were eligible for early escape. At week 24, all patients received apremilast through week 52.ResultsAmong 219 randomised patients (apremilast: n=110; placebo: n=109), a significantly greater American College of Rheumatology 20 response at week 16 (primary outcome) was observed with apremilast versus placebo (38.2% (42/110) vs 20.2% (22/109); P=0.004); response rates at week 2 (first assessment) were 16.4% (18/110) versus 6.4% (7/109) (P=0.025). Improvements in other efficacy outcomes, including 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS-28) using C reactive protein (CRP), swollen joint count, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), enthesitis and morning stiffness severity, were observed with apremilast at week 2. At week 16, apremilast significantly reduced PsA disease activity versus placebo, with changes in DAS-28 (CRP) (P<0.0001), HAQ-DI (P=0.023) and Gladman Enthesitis Index (P=0.001). Improvements were maintained with continued treatment through week 52. Over 52 weeks, apremilast’s safety profile was consistent with prior phase 3 studies in psoriasis and PsA. During weeks 0–24, the incidence of protocol-defined diarrhoea was 11.0% (apremilast) and 8.3% (placebo); serious adverse event rates were 2.8% (apremilast) and 4.6% (placebo).ConclusionsIn biological-naïve patients with PsA, onset of effect with apremilast was observed at week 2 and continued through week 52. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports.Trial registration numberNCT01925768; Results.

Download Full-text

Evaluation and validation of a patient completed psoriatic arthritis flare questionnaire

The Journal of Rheumatology ◽

10.3899/jrheum.201317 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. jrheum.201317

Author(s):

Philip S. Helliwell ◽

William Tillett ◽

Robin Waxman ◽

Laura C. Coates ◽

Mel Brooke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Loss Of Function ◽

Intra Class Correlation ◽

The Mean ◽

Definition Of ◽

Multiple Domains ◽

Intra Class Correlation Coefficient ◽

Symptoms And Signs ◽

Patient Opinion

Objective Evaluation of a psoriatic arthritis (PsA), multidimensional, patient completed disease flare questionnaire (FLARE). Methods The FLARE questionnaire was administered to 139 patients in a prospective observational study. The ‘gold standard’ of flare was based on patient opinion. Test-retest was evaluated by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Disease activity was measured by the PASDAS, GRACE, CPDAI and DAPSA. Results The most common symptoms of a PsA flare were musculoskeletal, followed by fatigue, frustration, loss of function and an increase in cutaneous symptoms. The test-retest ICC for the FLARE questionnaire was 0.87 (95% CI 0.72 – 0.94). The optimum cut-off to identify a flare of disease was 4/10 (sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.76; area under curve 0.85). For those patients scoring 4 or above, the mean score for the composite measures was as follows (score for those not reporting a flare in brackets): PASDAS, 5.3 ± 1.3 (3.1 ± 1.6); GRACE, 4.5 ± 1.2 (2.2 ± 1.4); CPDAI, 8.9 ± 2.5 (4.7 ± 3.1); DAPSA, 38.2 ± 20.3 (16.8 ± 14.9). In a new flare the increase in composite measure score was calculated as follows; 1 for PASDAS and GRACE, 2 for CPDAI, 7 for DAPSA. Moderate agreement was found between the definition of flare using the cut-off of 4, indicated by subjects in a separate question. Conclusion A PsA flare displays escalation of symptoms and signs across multiple domains; the FLARE questionnaire has external validity both in terms of composite disease activity and overall patient opinion of the state of their condition.

Download Full-text

Ideal target for psoriatic arthritis? Comparison of remission and low disease activity states in a real-life cohort

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211998 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 77 (2) ◽

pp. 251-257 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Leonieke J J van Mens ◽

Marleen G H van de Sande ◽

Arno W R van Kuijk ◽

Dominique Baeten ◽

Laura C Coates

Keyword(s):

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Skin Disease ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Activity Index ◽

Real Life ◽

Added Value ◽

Tender Joint Count ◽

Low Disease Activity

BackgroundPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) recommendations state that the target of treatment should be remission or low disease activity (LDA). We used a real-life dataset to compare different potential targets.Methods250 patients with PsA considered in an acceptable disease state according to their rheumatologist were included. Targets for remission were the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) remission (≤4), very low disease activity (VLDA) and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score ≤1.9. LDA targets analysed were the DAPSA ≤14, cDAPSA ≤13, minimal disease activity (MDA) and adjusted MDA targets: MDAjoints with both tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) mandated, MDAskin (psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) mandated) and MDAjoints&skin with TJC, SJC and PASI mandated.ResultsComparison of the several candidate targets demonstrates that VLDA is achieved by the lowest proportion of patients and includes patients with the lowest residual disease activity compared with the other remission targets. The modified MDA measures are the most stringent targets for LDA in terms of residual disease on joints, psoriasis and enthesitis within patients achieving the target. In both remission and LDA, the inclusion of C reactive protein did not show an added value. The exclusion of a skin domain, as in the DAPSA measures, resulted in negligence of skin disease and a negative impact on the quality of life in some patients.ConclusionsThe different remission and LDA targets show us significant overlap between measures, but these measures targeting the same definition do differ in terms of allowance of residual disease. Inclusion of laboratory markers seems unnecessary, although exclusion of a skin domain may result in psoriasis not being assessed resulting in residual impactful skin disease.

Download Full-text