scholarly journals Comparison and impact of COVID-19 for patients with cancer: a survival analysis of fatality rate controlling for age, sex and cancer type

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100341
Author(s):  
Haiquan Li ◽  
Edwin Baldwin ◽  
Xiang Zhang ◽  
Colleen Kenost ◽  
Wenting Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Fatality Rate ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Stratified Analysis

ObjectivesPrior research has reported an increased risk of fatality for patients with cancer, but most studies investigated the risk by comparing cancer to non-cancer patients among COVID-19 infections, where cancer might have contributed to the increased risk. This study is to understand COVID-19’s imposed HR of fatality while controlling for covariates, such as age, sex, metastasis status and cancer type.MethodsWe conducted survival analyses of 4606 cancer patients with COVID-19 test results from 16 March to 11 October 2020 in UK Biobank and estimated the overall HR of fatality with and without COVID-19 infection. We also examined the HRs of 13 specific cancer types with at least 100 patients using a stratified analysis.ResultsCOVID-19 resulted in an overall HR of 7.76 (95% CI 5.78 to 10.40, p<10−10) by following 4606 patients with cancer for 21 days after the tests. The HR varied among cancer type, with over a 10-fold increase in fatality rate (false discovery rate ≤0.02) for melanoma, haematological malignancies, uterine cancer and kidney cancer. Although COVID-19 imposed a higher risk for localised versus distant metastasis cancers, those of distant metastases yielded higher overall fatality rates due to their multiplicative effects.DiscussionThe results confirmed prior reports for the increased risk of fatality for patients with COVID-19 plus hematological malignancies and demonstrated similar findings of COVID-19 on melanoma, uterine, and kidney cancers.ConclusionThe results highlight the heightened risk that COVID-19 imposes on localised and haematological cancer patients and the necessity to vaccinate uninfected patients with cancer promptly, particularly for the cancer types most influenced by COVID-19. Results also suggest the importance of timely care for patients with localised cancer, whether they are infected by COVID-19 or not.

scholarly journals COVID-19 increases age- and sex-controlled 21-day fatality rates for patients with melanoma, hematologic malignancies, uterine cancer, or kidney cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiquan Li ◽  
Edwin Baldwin ◽  
Xiang Zhang ◽  
Colleen Kenost ◽  
Wenting Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Kidney Cancer ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
The Impact

AbstractIntroductionPrior research has reported an increased risk of fatality for cancer patients, but most studies investigated the risk by comparing cancer patients to non-cancer patients among COVID-19 infections. Only a few studies have compared the impact of a COVID-19 infection to non-infection with matched cancer patients and types.Methods & MaterialsWe conducted survival analyses of 4,606 cancer patients with COVID-19 test results from March 16 to October 11, 2020 in UK Biobank and estimated the overall hazard ratio of fatality with and without COVID-19 infection. We also examined the hazard ratios of thirteen specific cancer types with at least 100 patients.ResultsCOVID-19 resulted in an overall hazard ratio of 7.76 (95% CI: [5.78, 10.40], p<10−10) by studying the survival rate of 4,606 cancer patients for 21-days after the tests. The hazard ratio was shown to vary among cancer type, with over a 10-fold increase in fatality rate (false discovery rate≤0.02) for melanoma, hematologic malignancies, uterine cancer, and kidney cancer using a stratified analysis on each of the cancer types. Although COVID-19 imposed a higher risk for localized cancers compared to distant metastasis ones, those of distant metastasis yielded higher fatality rates due to their multiplicative effects.ConclusionThe results highlight the importance of timely care for localized and hematological cancer patients and the necessity to vaccinate uninfected patients as soon as possible, particularly for the cancer types influenced most by COVID-19.

scholarly journals Prostate Cancer-Associated Trousseau´S Syndrome Versus Asymptomatic Isolated Muscular Calf Vein Thrombosis as the Origin of Acute Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Antonis Tsamaloukas ◽  
Antonis Tsamaloukas ◽  
Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽  
Jan Roigas ◽  
Stefan Glück
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Factor Xii ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Calf Vein

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Cancer patients have a four to sevenfold increased risk of VTE compared with non-cancer patients and approximately 20% -30% of all VTE occurs in patients with cancer. Incidence of VTE varies with cancer type and is the highest among patients with metastatic-stage disease. Assessing risk of VTE in the patients with cancer and risk stratification tools as the Khorana score may predict VTE. The highest risk is associated with cancers of the pancreas, stomach, brain, and lung and some hematologic malignancies, whereas lower risks are associated with breast and prostate cancer. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for prostate cancer is 3.25(2,56 - 4,13) and for pancreas 15.56 (10.50-23.0). We give a case report with a quite perplexing undertaking, where a submassive acute pulmonary embolism (PE) originated from an asymptomatic calf vein thrombosis or intertwined with the Trousseau´s syndrome. Essential Section: One of the authors (A.T) was unexpected faced with the diagnosis of poorly differentiated prostate cancer. There were no signs of the disease, the PSA level was normal. As a retired medical oncologist, he had to care for many patients with prostate cancer and had now to cope with this cancer. To make the matter worse he suffered after the radical prostatectomy a submassive asymptomatic pulmonary embolism. Clinically there were no signs if a deep venous thrombosis. The coincidence of both events without clinical signs of a thrombosis could be caused by the Trousseau´s syndrome. Prostasomes extracellular vesicles synthesizes by prostate cancer cells and secreted into body fluids are prothrombotic by virtue of the expression of polyphosphate-activated coagulation factor XII.

Abstract 13145: Differences of Cancer Types in Hospital Mortality in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Okushi Yuichiro ◽  
Kenya Kusunose ◽  
Takayuki Ise ◽  
Takeshi Tobiume ◽  
Koji Yamaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Liver Cancers ◽  
Cancer Types

Introduction: We sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer-associated VTE, compared with the matched cohort without cancer using real-world big data of VTE. Background: Cancer is associated with a high incidence of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and there are many guidelines/recommendations about VTE. However, the prognosis of cancer-VTE patients is not well known because of a lack of big data. Moreover, there is also no knowledge on how cancer type is related to prognosis. Methods: This study was based on the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Datasets (JROAD-DPC). We identified 28,247 patients who were first hospitalized with VTE from April 2012 to March 2017. 26.0% were cancer patients. Compared with national statistics of cancer incidence in 2015 from National Cancer Center of Japan, the proportion of gynecological cancer patients was higher, but other cancer types had similar prevalence rates. Propensity score (PS) was estimated with logistic regression model, with cancer as the dependent variable and 18 clinically relevant covariates. Results: We included 24,576 patients after exclusion. The median age was 71years (range: 59-80 years), and 42.0% were male. On PS-matched analysis with 12,418 patients, patients with cancer had higher total in-hospital mortality (9.5% vs. 3.8%, P<0.001; OR, 2.72, 95% CI: 2.33-3.19) and in-hospital mortality within 30days (6.8% vs. 3.2%, P<0.001; OR, 2.20, 95% CI: 1.85-2.62). On analysis for each type of cancer, in-hospital mortality in 10 types of cancer was significantly high, especially pancreas (OR: 9.65, 95%CI: 4.31-21.64), biliary tract (OR: 8.36, 95%CI: 2.42-28.89) and liver (OR: 7.33, 95%CI: 1.92-28.02). Conclusions: Patients with cancer had a higher in-hospital mortality for VTE than those without cancer, especially in pancreatic, biliary tract and liver cancers.

scholarly journals Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3642
Author(s):  
Valentina Milazzo ◽  
Nicola Cosentino ◽  
Jeness Campodonico ◽  
Claudia Lucci ◽  
Daniela Cardinale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, with a reported prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) ranging from 3% to 17%. The increased risk of ACS in these patients seems to be due to the complex interaction of shared cardiovascular risk factors, cancer type and stage, and chemotherapeutic and radiotherapy regimens. The management of ACS in patients with cancer is a clinical challenge, particularly due to cancer’s unique pathophysiology, which makes it difficult to balance thrombotic and bleeding risks in this specific patient population. In addition, patients with cancer have largely been excluded from ACS trials. Hence, an evidence-based treatment for ACS in this group of patients is unknown and only a limited proportion of them is treated with antiplatelets or invasive revascularization, despite initial reports suggesting their beneficial prognostic effects in cancer patients. Finally, cancer patients experiencing ACS are also at higher risk of in-hospital and long-term mortality as compared to non-cancer patients. In this review, we will provide an overview on the available evidence of the relationship between ACS and cancer, in terms of clinical manifestations, possible underlying mechanisms, and therapeutic and prognostic implications.

Frequency, demographics and risk (according to tumour type or site) of cancer-associated thrombosis among patients seen at outpatient DVT clinics

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (02) ◽  
pp. 338-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shankaranarayana Paneesha ◽  
Aidan McManus ◽  
Roopen Arya ◽  
Nicholas Scriven ◽  
Timothy Farren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Similar Rate ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Tumour Site ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Skin Cancers ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Cancer Associated Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a clinically important complication for both hospitalised and ambulatory cancer patients. In the current study, the frequency, demographics and risk (according to tumour site) of VTE were examined among patients seen at outpatient DVT (deep-vein thrombosis) clinics. Of 10,015 VTE cases, 1,361 were diagnosed with cancer, for an overall rate of cancer-associated VTE of 13.6% in this outpatient population. Patients with cancer-associated VTE were significantly older than cancer-free VTE cases (66.4 ± 12.7 vs. 58.8 ± 18.5 years; p<0.0001). The frequency of cancer-associated VTE peaked earlier among females than males, occurring in the sixth (137/639, 21.4% vs. 98/851, 11.3%; p<0.001) and seventh decades (213/980, 21.7% vs. 197/1096, 18%; p=0.036). VTE was described most frequently in common cancers – breast, prostate, colorectal and lung (56.1% of cases). The risk of VTE varied widely across 17 cancer types. Calculating odds ratios (OR) to assess the effect size of cancer type on VTE risk, the highest odds were observed for patients with pancreatic cancer (OR 9.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] (5.51–16.91). Tumours of the head and neck had higher odds than previously reported (OR 8.24, 95% CI 5.06–13.42). Reduced risk estimates were observed for skin cancers (melanoma and non-melanoma: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.42–1.87; OR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.32–1.69, respectively). We conclude that outpatients have a similar rate of cancer-associated VTE as VTE patient populations previously reported, that cancer-associated VTE occurs in an older age group and earlier in females and that outpatients exhibit distinct tumour site-specific risk from that described among hospitalised cancer patients.

Outcomes of COVID-19 in cancer patients: Report from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1500-1500
Author(s):  
Noha Sharafeldin ◽  
Jing Su ◽  
Vithal Madhira ◽  
Qianqian Song ◽  
Eileen Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Diagnostic Code ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Representative Cohort

1500 Background: The impact of COVID-19 has disproportionately affected every aspect of cancer care and research—from introducing new risks for patients to disrupting the delivery of treatment and continuity of research. Variation in risk of adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients by cancer type has been reported from relatively small cohorts. Gaps in understanding effects of COVID-19 on cancer patients can be addressed through the study of a well-constructed representative cohort. The NCATS’ National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is a centralized data resource representing the largest multi-center cohort of COVID-19 cases and controls nationwide. We aimed to construct and characterize the cohort of cancer patients within N3C and identify risk factors for all-cause mortality from COVID-19. Methods: From the harmonized N3C clinical dataset, we used 3,295,963 patients from 39 medical US centers to construct a cancer patient cohort. We restricted analyses to adults ≥18 yo with a COVID-19 positive PCR or antigen test or ICD-10-CM diagnostic code for COVID-19 between 1/1/2020 and 2/14/2021. We followed N3C definitions where each lab-confirmed positive patient has one single index encounter. A modified WHO Clinical Progression Scale was used to determine clinical severity. All analyses were performed in the N3C Data Enclave on the Palantir platform. Results: A total of 372,883 adult patients with cancer were identified from the N3C cohort; 54,642 (14.7%) were COVID-19 positive. Most common represented cancers were skin (11.5%), breast (10.2%), prostate (8%), and lung cancer (5.6%). Mean age of COVID-19 positive patients was 61.6 years (SD 16.7), 47.3% over 65yo, 53.7% females, 67.2% non-Hispanic White, 21.0% Black, and 7.7% Hispanic or Latino. A total of 14.6% were current or former smokers, 22.3% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score of 0, 4.6% score of 1 and 28.1% score of 2. Among hospitalized COVID-19 positive patients, average length of stay in the hospital was 6 days (SD 23.1 days), 7.0% patients had died while in their initial COVID-19 hospitalization, 4.5% required invasive ventilation, and 0.1% extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Survival probability was 86.4% at 10 days and 63.6% at 30 days. Older age over 65yo (Hazard ratio (HR) = 6.1, 95%CI: 4.3, 8.7), male gender (HR = 1.2, 95%CI: 1.1, 1.2), a CCI score of 2 or more (HR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.1, 1.2), and acute kidney injury during hospitalization (HR = 1.3, 95%CI: 1.2, 1.4) were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Using the N3C cohort we assembled the largest nationally representative cohort on patients with cancer and COVID-19 to date. We identified demographic and clinical factors associated with increased all-cause mortality in cancer patients. Full characterization of the cohort will provide further insights on the effects of COVID-19 on cancer outcomes and the ability to continue specific cancer treatments.

Abstract 14: The Influence of Provider Specialty on Anticoagulation Prescription Fills and Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With History of Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley T O’Neal ◽  
J’Neka Claxton ◽  
Richard MacLehose ◽  
Lin Chen ◽  
Lindsay G Bengtson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Reduced Risk ◽  
History Of Cancer

Background: Early cardiology involvement within 90 days of atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis is associated with greater likelihood of oral anticoagulant use and a reduced risk of stroke. Due to variation in cardiovascular care for patients with cancer, it is possible that a similar association does not exist for AF patients with cancer. Methods: We examined the association of early cardiology involvement with oral anticoagulation use among non-valvular AF patients with history of cancer (past or active), using data from 388,045 patients (mean age=68±15 years; 59% male) from the MarketScan database (2009-2014). ICD-9 codes in any position were used to identify cancer diagnosis prior to AF diagnosis. Provider specialty and filled anticoagulant prescriptions 3 months prior to and 6 months after AF diagnosis were obtained. Poisson regression models were used to compute the probability of an oral anticoagulant prescription fill and Cox regression was used to estimate the risk of stroke and major bleeding. Results: A total of 64,016 (17%) AF patients had a prior history of cancer. Cardiology involvement was less likely to occur among patients with history of cancer than those without (relative risk=0.92, 95% confidence interval (0.91, 0.93)). Similar differences were observed for cancers of the colon (0.90 (0.88, 0.92)), lung (0.76 (0.74, 0.78)), pancreas (0.74 (0.69, 0.80)), and hematologic system (0.88 (0.87, 0.90)), while no differences were observed for breast or prostate cancers. Patients with cancer were less likely to fill prescriptions for anticoagulants (0.89 (0.88, 0.90)) than those without cancer, and similar results were observed for cancers of the colon, lung, prostate, pancreas, and hematologic system. However, patients with cancer were more likely to fill prescriptions for anticoagulants (1.48 (1.45, 1.52)) if seen by a cardiology provider, regardless of cancer type. A reduced risk of stroke (hazard ratio=0.89 (0.81, 0.99)) was observed among all cancer patients who were seen by a cardiology provider than among those who were not, without an increased risk of bleeding (1.04 (0.95, 1.13)). Conclusion: AF patients with cancer were less likely to see a cardiologist, and less likely to fill an anticoagulant prescription than AF patients without cancer. However, cardiology involvement was associated with increased anticoagulant prescription fills and reduced risk of stroke, suggesting a beneficial role for cardiology providers to improve outcomes in AF patients with history of cancer.

Attention to diet, exercise, and weight in the oncology clinic: Results of a national patient survey.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10549-10549
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Ligibel ◽  
Lori J. Pierce ◽  
Catherine M. Bender ◽  
Tracy E Crane ◽  
Christina Marie Dieli-Conwright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Diet And Exercise ◽  
To Receive

10549 Background: Obesity and related factors are increasingly associated with increased risk of developing and dying from cancer. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conducted a survey of cancer patients to assess their experience in receiving recommendations and referrals related to weight, diet and exercise as a part of their cancer care. Methods: An online survey was distributed to potential participants between March and June 2020 via ASCO channels and patient advocacy organizations, with an estimated reach of over 25,000 individuals. Eligibility criteria included being 18 years, living in the US, and having been diagnosed with cancer. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with recommendation and referral patterns. Results: In total, 2419 individuals responded to the survey. Most respondents were female (75.5%), 61.8% had an early-stage malignancy, 38.2% had advanced disease, and 49.0% were currently receiving treatment. Breast cancer was the most common cancer type (36.0%). Average BMI was 25.8 kg/m2. The majority of respondents consumed £2 servings of fruits and vegetables per day (50.9%) and exercised £2 times per week (50.4%). Exercise was addressed at most or some oncology visits in 57.5% of respondents, diet in 50.7%, and weight in 28.4%. Referrals were less common: 14.9% of respondents were referred to an exercise program, 25.6% to a dietitian and 4.5% to a weight management program. In multiple regression analyses, racial and ethnicity minority respondents were more likely to receive advice about diet (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.56-2.38) and weight (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.23-2.17) compared to non-Hispanic whites, individuals diagnosed with cancer in the past 5 yrs (vs > 5 yrs) were more likely to receive advice about exercise (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.23-1.79), and breast cancer patients were more likely to receive advice about exercise (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11-1.68) and weight (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.03-2.07) than other cancer patients. Overall, 74% of survey respondents had changed their diet or exercise after cancer diagnosis. Respondents reporting that their oncologist spoke to them about increasing exercise or eating healthier foods were more likely to report a change in behavior than those whose oncologists did not (exercise: 79.6% vs 69.0%, P < 0.001; diet 81.1% vs 71.4%, P < 0.001). Respondents whose oncologist had spoken to them about exercise were more likely to exercise > 2 times per week compared to respondents whose oncologists did not address exercise (53.5% vs 44.1%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: In a national survey of oncology patients, slightly more than half of respondents reported attention to diet and exercise during oncology visits. Provider recommendations for diet and exercise were associated with positive changes in these behaviors. Additional attention to diet and exercise as part of oncology visits is needed to help support healthy lifestyle change in cancer patients.

Impact of cancer on emergency department outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18618-e18618
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Qian ◽  
Edmund M. Qiao ◽  
Vinit Nalawade ◽  
Rohith S. Voora ◽  
Nikhil V. Kotha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Inpatient Admission ◽  
Cancer Site ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

e18618 Background: Cancer patients frequently utilize the Emergency Department (ED) for a variety of diagnoses, both related and unrelated to their cancer. Patients with cancer have unique risks related to their cancer and treatment which could influence ED-related outcomes. A better understanding of these risks could help improve risk-stratification for these patients and help inform future interventions. This study sought to define the increased risks cancer patients face for inpatient admission and hospital mortality among cancer patients presenting to the ED. Methods: From the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) we identified patients with and without a diagnosis of cancer presenting to the ED between 2016 and 2018. We used International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD10-CM) codes to identify patients with cancer, and to identify patient’s presenting diagnosis. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models assessed the influence of cancer diagnoses on two endpoints: hospital admission from the ED, and inpatient hospital mortality. Results: There were 340 million weighted ED visits, of which 8.3 million (2.3%) occurred in patients with a cancer diagnosis. Compared to non-cancer patients, patients with cancer had an increased risk of inpatient admission (64.7% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.0001) and hospital mortality (4.6% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.0001). Factors associated with both an increased risk of hospitalization and death included older age, male gender, lower income level, discharge quarter, and receipt of care in a teaching hospital. We identified the top 15 most common presenting diagnoses among cancer patients, and among each of these diagnoses, cancer patients had increased risks of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] range 2.0-13.2; all p < 0.05) and death (OR range 2.1-14.4; all p < 0.05) compared to non-cancer patients with the same diagnosis. Within the cancer patient cohort, cancer site was the most robust individual predictor associated with risk of hospitalization or death, with highest risk among patients with metastatic cancer, liver and lung cancers compared to the reference group of prostate cancer patients. Conclusions: Cancer patients presenting to the ED have high risks for hospital admission and death when compared to patients without cancer. Cancer patients represent a distinct population and may benefit from cancer-specific risk stratification or focused interventions tailored to improve outcomes in the ED setting.

Exploration of the MSI landscape in Chinese pan-cancer patient by Next-Generation Sequencing.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14576-e14576
Author(s):  
Xinlu Liu ◽  
Jiasheng Xu ◽  
Jian Sun ◽  
Deng Wei ◽  
Xinsheng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Correlation Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Chinese Cancer Patients ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Pan Cancer

e14576 Background: Clinically, MSI had been used as an important molecular marker for the prognosis of colorectal cancer and other solid tumors and the formulation of adjuvant treatment plans, and it had been used to assist in the screening of Lynch syndrome. However, there were currently few reports on the incidence of MSI-H in Chinese pan-cancer patients. This study described the occurrence of MSI in a large multi-center pan-cancer cohort in China, and explored the correlation between MSI and patients' TMB, age, PD-L1 expression and other indicators. Methods: The study included 8361 patients with 8 cancer types from multiple tumor centers. Use immunohistochemistry to detect the expression of MMR protein (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) in patients with various cancer types to determine the MSI status and detect the expression of PD-L1 in patients. Through NGS technology, 831 genes of 8361 Chinese cancer patients were sequenced and the tumor mutation load of the patients was calculated. The MSI mutations of patients in 8 cancer types were analyzed and the correlation between MSI mutations of patients and the patient's age, TMB and PD-L1 expression was analyzed. Results: The test results showed that MSI patients accounted for 1.66% of pan-cancers. Among them, MSI-H patients accounted for the highest proportion in intestinal cancer, reaching 7.2%. The correlation analysis between MSI and TMB was performed on patients of various cancer types. The results showed that: in each cancer type, MSI-H patients had TMB greater than 10, and 26.83% of MSI-H patients had TMB greater than 100 in colorectal cancer patients. The result of correlation analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between the patient's age and the risk of MSI mutation ( P> 0.05). In addition to PAAD and LUAD, the expression of PD-L1 in MSI-H patients was higher than that in MSS patients in other cancer types( P< 0.05). The correlation analysis between PD-L1 expression and TMB in patients found that in colorectal cancer, the higher the expression of PD-L1, the higher the patient's TMB ( P< 0.05). Conclusions: In this study, we explored the incidence of MSI-H in pan-cancer patients in China and found that the TMB was greater than 10 in patients with MSI-H. Compared with MSS patients, MSI-H patients have higher PD-L1 expression, and the higher the PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer, the higher the TMB value of patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document