scholarly journals Burden of heart failure in Flemish general practices: a registry-based study in the Intego database

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e022972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miek Smeets ◽  
Bert Vaes ◽  
Pavlos Mamouris ◽  
Marjan Van Den Akker ◽  
Gijs Van Pottelbergh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Sharp Increase ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Downward Trend ◽  
Cardiovascular Medication ◽  
The Past ◽  
Joint Point ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Β Blockers

ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence and incidence of heart failure (HF) stages A to C/D and their evolution over a 16-year period. Additionally, trends in comorbidities and cardiovascular (CV) treatment in patients with HF were studied in the same period.DesignRegistry-based study.SettingPrimary care, Flanders, Belgium.ParticipantsData were obtained from Intego, a morbidity registration network in which 111 general practitioners of 48 practices collaborate. In the study period between 2000 and 2015, data from 165 796 unique patients aged 45 years and older were available.Outcome measuresPrevalence and incidence were calculated for HF stage A, B and C/D by gender. Additionally, the trend in age-standardised prevalence and incidence rates between 2000 and 2015 was analysed with joint-point regression. The same model was used to study trends in comorbidity profiles in incident HF cases and trends in cardiovascular medication in prevalent HF cases.ResultsWe found a downward trend in the incidence and prevalence of HF stage C/D in Flemish general practice between 2000 and 2015, whereas the prevalence and incidence of stage A and B increased. The burden of comorbidities in incident HF cases increased during the study period, as shown by an increasing disease count (p<0.001). The prescription of cardiovascular medication such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, β-blockers and statins showed a sharp increase in the first part of the study period (2000–2008).ConclusionAge-standardised incidence and prevalence of HF stage C/D showed a slightly downward trend over the past 16 years, probably due to the sharp increase in cardiovascular treatment. However, the increasing age-standardised incidence and prevalence of stage A and B, as precursors of symptomatic HF, together with a rising comorbid burden, highlights the challenges we are still facing.

scholarly journals Cross sectional study estimating prevalence of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in community patients at risk

Heart ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
O W Nielsen ◽  
J Hilden ◽  
C T Larsen ◽  
J F Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
General Practices

OBJECTIVETo examine a general practice population to measure the prevalence of signs and symptoms of heart failure (SSHF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).DESIGNCross sectional screening study in three general practices followed by echocardiography.SETTING AND PATIENTSAll patients ⩾ 50 years in two general practices and ⩾ 40 years in one general practice were screened by case record reviews and questionnaires (n = 2158), to identify subjects with some evidence of heart disease. Among these, subjects were sought who had SSHF (n = 115). Of 357 subjects with evidence of heart disease, 252 were eligible for examination, and 126 underwent further cardiological assessment, including 43 with SSHF.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESPrevalence of SSHF as defined by a modified Boston index, LVSD defined as an indirectly measured left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽ 0.45, and numbers of subjects needing an echocardiogram to detect one case with LVSD.RESULTSSSHF afflicted 0.5% of quadragenarians and rose to 11.7% of octogenarians. Two thirds were handled in primary care only. At ⩾ 50 years of age 6.4% had SSHF, 2.9% had LVSD, and 1.9% (95% confidence interval 1.3% to 2.5%) had both. To detect one case with LVSD in primary care, 14 patients with evidence of heart disease without SSHF and 5.5 patients with SSHF had to be examined.CONCLUSIONSSHF is extremely prevalent in the community, especially in primary care, but more than two thirds do not have LVSD. The number of subjects with some evidence of heart disease needing an echocardiogram to detect one case of LVSD is 14.

scholarly journals Real-world presentation with heart failure in primary care: do patients selected to follow diagnostic and management guidelines have better outcomes?

Open Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000935
Author(s):  
Alex Bottle ◽  
Dani Kim ◽  
Paul P Aylin ◽  
F Azeem Majeed ◽  
Martin R Cowie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Initial Management ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Specialist Referral ◽  
Partial Completion ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Using Data

ObjectiveTo describe associations between initial management of people presenting with heart failure (HF) symptoms in primary care, including compliance with the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and subsequent unplanned hospitalisation for HF and death.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using data from general practices submitting records to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The cohort comprised patients diagnosed with HF during 2010–2013 and presenting to their general practitioners with breathlessness, fatigue or ankle swelling.Results13 897 patients were included in the study. Within the first 6 months, only 7% had completed the NICE-recommended pathway; another 18.6% had followed part of it (B-type natriuretic peptide testing and/or echocardiography, or specialist referral). Significant differences in hazards were seen in unadjusted analysis in favour of full or partial completion of the NICE-recommended pathway. Covariate adjustment attenuated the relations with death much more than those for HF admission. Compared with patients placed on the NICE pathway, treatment with HF medications had an HR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.28, p=0.003) for HF admission and 1.03 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.17, p= 0.674) for death. Patients who partially followed the NICE pathway had similar hazards to those who completed it. Patients on no pathway had the highest hazard for HF admission at 1.30 (95% 1.18 to 1.43, p<0.001) but similar hazard for death.ConclusionsPatients not put on at least some elements of the NICE-recommended pathway had significantly higher risk of HF admission but non-significant higher risk of death than other patients had.

scholarly journals Sepsis Recording in Primary Care Electronic Health Records, Linked Hospital Episodes and Mortality Records: Population-based Cohort Study in England

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Rezel-Potts ◽  
Martin C. Gulliford ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Recent Period ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Different Sources

AbstractObjectivesSepsis is a growing concern for health systems, but the epidemiology of sepsis is poorly characterised. We evaluated sepsis recording across primary care electronic records, hospital episodes and mortality registrations.Methods and FindingsCohort study including 378 general practices in England from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database from 2002 to 2017 with 36,209,676 patient-years of follow-up with linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality registrations. Incident sepsis episodes were identified for each source. Concurrent records from different sources were identified and age-standardised and age-specific incidence rates compared. Logistic regression analysis evaluated associations of gender, age-group, fifth of deprivation and period of diagnosis with concurrent sepsis recording.There were 20,206 first episodes of sepsis from primary care, 20,278 from HES and 13,972 from ONS. There were 4,117 (20%) first HES sepsis events and 2,438 (17%) mortality records concurrent with incident primary care sepsis records within 30 days. Concurrent HES and primary care records of sepsis within 30 days before or after first diagnosis were higher at younger or older ages and for patients with the most recent period of diagnosis with those diagnosed during 2007:2011 less likely to have a concurrent HES record given CPRD compared to those diagnosed during 2012 to 2017 (odd ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.70). At age 85 and older, primary care incidence was 5.22 per 1,000 patient years (95% CI 1.75 to 11.97) in men and 3.55 (0.87 to 9.58) in women which increased to 10.09 (4.86 to 18.51) for men and 7.22 (2.96 to 14.72) for women after inclusion of all three sources.ConclusionExplicit recording of sepsis is inconsistent across healthcare sectors with a high proportion of non-concurrent records. Incidence estimates are higher when linked data are analysed.

scholarly journals Knowledge Translation in Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (SP1) ◽  
pp. 27-35
Author(s):  
Darshan H. Brahmbhatt ◽  
Jeremy Kobulnik
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
New Therapies ◽  
The Past ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Barriers To Implementation

The treatment of heart failure has expanded over the past three decades with large numbers of new medications and healthcare innovations available for these patients. At the same time, the prevalence of heart failure continues to increase across Canada and these patients are managed by a variety of clinicians from differing backgrounds in both primary care and hospital settings. Despite national recommendations advocating uptake of these new therapies, their utilization remains limited and inconsistent across the country. This review discusses the importance of knowledge translation in heart failure and examines the barriers to implementation of new therapies and models of care, providing a range of solutions to facilitate the delivery of guideline-directed care for heart failure patients.

scholarly journals Sepsis recording in primary care electronic health records, linked hospital episodes and mortality records: Population-based cohort study in England

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0244764
Author(s):  
Emma Rezel-Potts ◽  
Martin C. Gulliford ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Recent Period ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Different Sources

Background Sepsis is a growing concern for health systems, but the epidemiology of sepsis is poorly characterised. We evaluated sepsis recording across primary care electronic records, hospital episodes and mortality registrations. Methods and findings Cohort study including 378 general practices in England from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database from 2002–2017 with 36,209,676 patient-years of follow-up with linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality registrations. Incident sepsis episodes were identified for each source. Concurrent records from different sources were identified and age-standardised and age-specific incidence rates compared. Logistic regression analysis evaluated associations of gender, age-group, fifth of deprivation and period of diagnosis with concurrent sepsis recording. There were 20,206 first episodes of sepsis from primary care, 20,278 from HES and 13,972 from ONS. There were 4,117 (20%) first HES sepsis events and 2,438 (17%) mortality records concurrent with incident primary care sepsis records within 30 days. Concurrent HES and primary care records of sepsis within 30 days before or after first diagnosis were higher at younger or older ages and for patients with the most recent period of diagnosis. Those diagnosed during 2007:2011 were less likely to have a concurrent HES record given CPRD compared to those diagnosed during 2012–2017 (odd ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.60–0.70). At age 85 and older, primary care incidence was 5.22 per 1,000 patient years (95% CI 1.75–11.97) in men and 3.55 (0.87–9.58) in women which increased to 10.09 (4.86–18.51) for men and 7.22 (2.96–14.72) for women after inclusion of all three sources. Conclusion Explicit recording of ‘sepsis’ is inconsistent across healthcare sectors with a high proportion of non-concurrent records. Incidence estimates are higher when linked data are analysed.

scholarly journals Adherence to guidelines in management of symptoms suggestive of heart failure in primary care

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. 678-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedict Hayhoe ◽  
Dani Kim ◽  
Paul P Aylin ◽  
F Azeem Majeed ◽  
Martin R Cowie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Presenting Symptoms ◽  
Specialist Referral ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Treatment And Diagnosis ◽  
Symptom Type

ObjectiveClinical guidelines on heart failure (HF) suggest timings for investigation and referral in primary care. We calculated the time for patients to achieve key elements in the recommended pathway to diagnosis of HF.MethodsIn this observational study, we used linked primary and secondary care data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a database of anonymised electronic records from UK general practices) between 2010 and 2013. Records were examined for presenting symptoms (breathlessness, fatigue, ankle swelling) and key elements of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-recommended pathway to diagnosis (serum natriuretic peptide (NP) test, echocardiography, specialist referral).Results42 403 patients were diagnosed with HF, of whom 16 597 presented in primary care with suggestive symptoms. 6464 (39%) had recorded NP or echocardiography, and 6043 (36%) specialist referral. Median time from recorded symptom(s) to investigation (NP or echocardiography) was 292 days (IQR 34–844) and to referral 236 days (IQR 42–721). Median time from symptom(s) to diagnosis was 972 days (IQR 337–1468) and to treatment with HF-relevant medication 803 days (IQR 230–1364). Factors significantly affecting timing of referral, treatment and diagnosis included patients’ sex (p=0.001), age (p<0.001), deprivation score (p=0.001), comorbidities (p<0.001) and presenting symptom type (p<0.001).ConclusionsMedian times to investigation or referral of patients presenting in primary care with symptoms suggestive of HF considerably exceeded recommendations. There is a need to support clinicians in the diagnosis of HF in primary care, with improved access to investigation and specialist assessment to support timely management.

scholarly journals Incidence of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality in patients with peripheral artery disease: nationwide trends between 1997 and 2016

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kamil ◽  
T S G Sehested ◽  
K Houlind ◽  
J F Lassen ◽  
G Gislason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
The Past ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
First Time ◽  
Time Diagnosis

Abstract Background Over the past decades there has been a shift in cardiovascular (CV) risk factors with improved outcomes. Updated trends in incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure (HF) in peripheral artery disease (PAD) are warranted. Purpose We aimed to investigate trends in the incidence of MI, HF, and CV mortality in PAD patients during the past two decades. Methods Nationwide registers were used to identify all patients aged ≥18 years, with first-time diagnosis of PAD between 1997 and 2016. Age-standardized incidence rates per 1,000 person-years (IR) were calculated to estimate trends of MI, HF, and CV mortality. Furthermore, risk of MI, HF, and CV mortality was estimated by 1-year cumulative-incidence with death as competing risk. Results A total of 136,746 patients with first-time diagnosis of PAD were included. Mean age was 70.01 [IQR 61–77 years], and 53.05% of the identified patients were male. The 1-year cumulative-incidence of MI in patients with PAD were 1.88% for year 1997–2000, 2.12% for year 2001–2005, 1.59% for year 2006–2010, and 1.32% for year 2011–2016, respectively. The 1-year cumulative-incidence of HF in patients with PAD were 1.71%, 1.48%, 1.25%, and 1.11% for the 1997–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010, and 2011–2016 year-groups, respectively. Furthermore the 1-year cumulative-incidence of CV mortality in patients with PAD were 12.0%, 9.41%, 8.75%, and 7.80% for the 1997–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010, and 2011–2016 year-groups, respectively. Likewise, the age-standardized incidence rates pr. 1,000 person-years showed increasing trends of MI up until 2002 with an estimated annual percent change (APC) of +0.6 (95% CI 3.3–16.1, p-value 0.2). After year 2002 the IR decreased significantly with an estimated APC of −5.0 (95% CI 3.7–6.3, p&lt;0.0001). The age-standardized IR for HF decreased with an estimated APC of −3.3 (95% CI 2.0–4.6, p&lt;0.0001), and similarly for CV death decreased by −3.5 (95% CI 3.0–4.0, p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion The incidence of MI and HF in patients with PAD has significantly decreased over time together with a subsequent decline in CV mortality. This may suggest that the improvements in preventive strategies aimed at reducing CV risk are effective and contributes to lower incidence of MI and HF and thereby improved mortality rates in the past two decades. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals Heart failure in primary care: prevalence related to age and comorbidity

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieke Bosch ◽  
Patricia Assmann ◽  
Wim J. C. de Grauw ◽  
Bianca W. M. Schalk ◽  
Marion C. J. Biermans
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder ◽  
Pulmonary Disorder ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Using Data

Abstract Background Diagnosing heart failure (HF) in primary care can be challenging, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities. Insight in the prevalence, age, comorbidity and routine practice of diagnosing HF in general practice may improve the process of diagnosing HF. Aim To examine the prevalence of HF in relation to ageing and comorbidities, and routine practice of diagnosing HF in general practice. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from electronic health records of 56 320 adult patients of 11 general practices. HF patients were compared with patients without HF using descriptive analyses and χ2 tests. The following comorbidities were considered: chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, anaemia and renal function disorder (RFD). Separate analyses were performed for men and women. Findings The point prevalence of HF was 1.2% (95% confidence interval 1.13–1.33) and increased with each age category from 0.04% (18–44 years) to 20.9% (⩾85 years). All studied comorbidities were significantly (P<0.001) more common in HF patients than in patients without HF: COPD (24.1% versus 3.1%), DM (34.7% versus 6.5%), hypertension (52.7% versus 16.0%), anaemia (10.9% versus 2.3%) and RFD (61.8% versus 7.5%). N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) was recorded in 38.1% of HF patients. Conclusions HF is highly associated with ageing and comorbidities. Diagnostic use of NT-proBNP in routine primary care seems underutilized. Instruction of GPs to determine NT-proBNP in patients suspected of HF is recommended, especially In elderly patients with comorbidities.

scholarly journals Gynecological aspects in the trends in morbidity and mortality from cancer of the reproductive system

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
L. A. Ashrafyan ◽  
E. G. Novikova
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mammary Gland ◽  
Reproductive System ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
The Past ◽  
Diagnostic Center

The article discusses the incidence rates of cancer of the reproductive system organs (mammary gland, endometrium, ovaries, cervix) in Moscow in 1999, analyzes the trend of these indicators over the past 10 years, substantiates the need to revise the principles of the primary care of the obstetric and gynecological service (female consultations), a model of a gynecological diagnostic center is proposed

scholarly journals Three decades of eating disorders in Dutch primary care: decreasing incidence of bulimia nervosa but not of anorexia nervosa

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. R. E. Smink ◽  
D. van Hoeken ◽  
G. A. Donker ◽  
E. S. Susser ◽  
A. J. Oldehinkel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Anorexia Nervosa ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Bulimia Nervosa ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
The Past

BackgroundWhether the incidence of eating disorders in Western, industrialized countries has changed over time has been the subject of much debate. The purpose of this primary-care study was to examine changes in the incidence of eating disorders in The Netherlands during the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s.MethodA nationwide network of general practitioners (GPs), serving a representative sample (~1%) of the total Dutch population, recorded newly diagnosed patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) in their practice during 1985–1989, 1995–1999, and 2005–2009. GPs are key players in the Dutch healthcare system, as their written referral is mandatory in order to get access to specialized (mental) healthcare, covered by health insurance. Health insurance is virtually universal in The Netherlands (99% of the population). A substantial number of GPs participated in all three study periods, during which the same case identification criteria were used and the same psychiatrist was responsible for making the final diagnoses. Incidence rates were calculated and for comparison between periods, incidence rate ratios.ResultsThe overall incidence rate of BN decreased significantly in the past three decades (from 8.6 per 100 000 person-years in 1985–1989 to 6.1 in 1995–1999, and 3.2 in 2005–2009). The overall incidence of AN remained fairly stable during three decades, i.e. 7.4 per 1 00 000 person-years in 1985–1989, 7.8 in 1995–1999, and 6.0 in 2005–2009.ConclusionsThe incidence rate of BN decreased significantly over the past three decades, while the overall incidence rate of AN remained stable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document