Gastrointestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Sweden: a nationwide cohort study

ObjectivesTo compare incidence rates of gastrointestinal (GI) perforations between patients with RA and the general population, and between patients treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and non-TNFi biologics.MethodsIn this nationwide cohort study, a total of 63 532 patients with RA, with 26 050 biological treatment episodes (TNFi, rituximab, abatacept or tocilizumab) and 76 304 general population controls, were followed between 2009 and 2017 until the first outcome event. The main outcome was hospitalisation or death due to lower GI perforations, identified according to a prespecified list of ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) codes. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for adjustment.ResultsThe sex-standardised and age-standardised incidence rates of lower GI perforations were 1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3) events per 1000 person-years among general population controls, 1.6 (1.5–1.7) among bionaïve patients and ranged from 1.8 (1.4–3.6) (TNFi) to 4.5 (2.7–10.4) (tocilizumab) among biologics-treated patients. After adjustment for glucocorticoid use, the risk in bionaïve, TNFi-treated, abatacept-treated or rituximab-treated patients with RA was no longer different from the general population, while for tocilizumab it remained significantly higher. Comparing tocilizumab to TNFi, the adjusted HR for lower GI perforations was 2.2 (1.3–3.8), corresponding to one additional GI perforation per 451 patient-years treated with tocilizumab instead of TNFi.ConclusionTocilizumab was associated with a higher risk of lower GI perforations compared with alternative biologics. In absolute numbers, the risk remained low on all biologics commonly used to treat RA, but the accumulated evidence across settings and outcome definitions supports that this risk should be considered in treatment guidelines for RA.

Download Full-text

Non-specific diagnoses are frequent in patients hospitalized after calling 112 and their mortality is high – a register-based Danish cohort study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-23364/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Frederikke Vestergaard Nielsen ◽

Mette Rønn Nielsen ◽

Ida Lund Lorenzen ◽

Jesper Amstrup ◽

Torben Anders Kløjgaard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

Rank Test ◽

Test Results ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Specific Diagnosis ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Icd 10

Abstract Background The number of patients calling for an ambulance increases. A considerable number of patients receive a non-specific diagnosis at discharge from the hospital, and this could imply less serious acute conditions, but the mortality has only scarcely been studied. The aim of this study was to examine the most frequent sub-diagnoses among patients with hospital non-specific diagnoses after calling 112 and their subsequent mortality. Methods A historical cohort study of patients brought to the hospital by ambulance after calling 112 in 2007-2014 and diagnosed with a non-specific diagnosis, chapter R or Z, in the International Classification of Diseases, 10 th edition (ICD-10). 1-day and 30-day mortality was analyzed by survival analyses and compared by the log-rank test. Results We included 74,847 ambulance runs in 53,937 unique individuals. The most frequent diagnoses were ‘unspecified disease’ (Z039), constituting 47.0 % (n 35,279). In children 0-9 years old, ‘febrile convulsions’ was the most frequent non-specific diagnosis used in 54.3 % (n 1,602). Overall, 1- and 30-day mortality was 2.2 % (n 1,205) and 6.0 % (n 3,258). The highest mortality was in the diagnostic group ‘suspected cardiovascular disease’ (Z035) and ‘unspecified disease’ (Z039) with 1-day mortality 2.6 % (n 43) and 2.4 % (n 589), and 30 day mortality of 6.32 % (n 104) and 8.1 % (n 1,975). Conclusion Among patients calling an ambulance and discharged with non-specific diagnoses the 1- and 30-day mortality, despite modest mortality percentages lead to a high number of deaths.

Download Full-text

Schizophrenic patients: physical health and access to somatic care

European Psychiatry ◽

10.1016/s0924-9338(97)84788-8 ◽

1997 ◽

Vol 12 (6) ◽

pp. 289-293 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

F Casadebaig ◽

A Philippe ◽

JM Guillaud-Bataille ◽

MF Gausset ◽

N Quemada ◽

...

Keyword(s):

General Population ◽

Physical Health ◽

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

Public Institutions ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Public Health Survey ◽

Icd 10 ◽

Schizophrenic Patients ◽

Research Criteria

SummaryThis study concerns the state of physical health and the availability of somatic care for 3,470 adult patients diagnosed as schizophrenic according to the research criteria established by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10 F20) and treated in public institutions. These institutions volunteered to participate in the study, whereas the patients were selected at random. Data concerning demographic characteristics, physical health, and access to somatic care are compared to that of a public health survey of a sample of the French population. The present study allows the estimation of ratios for a large number of diseases and of some risk factors among the target group. Heavy smokers and overweight individuals are more numerous among schizophrenics. Pathologies such as epilepsy, diabetes and AIDS infection are overrepresented. Patients' access to somatic care is more prevalent than that of the general population overall, similar to that of the less qualified workers or unemployed group. In this study, gender does not appear to allow prediction of care use for schizophrenics in contrast to the general population.

Download Full-text

Non-specific diagnoses are frequent in patients hospitalized after calling 112 and their mortality is high – a register-based Danish cohort study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-23364/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Frederikke Vestergaard Nielsen ◽

Mette Rønn Nielsen ◽

Ida Lund Lorenzen ◽

Jesper Amstrup ◽

Torben Anders Kløjgaard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

Rank Test ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Specific Diagnosis ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Icd 10

Abstract Background The number of patients calling for an ambulance increases. A considerable number of patients receive a non-specific diagnosis at discharge from the hospital, and this could imply less serious acute conditions, but the mortality has only scarcely been studied. The aim of this study was to examine the most frequent sub-diagnoses among patients with hospital non-specific diagnoses after calling 112 and their subsequent mortality.Methods A historical cohort study of patients brought to the hospital by ambulance after calling 112 in 2007-2014 and diagnosed with a non-specific diagnosis, chapter R or Z, in the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10). 1-day and 30-day mortality was analyzed by survival analyses and compared by the log-rank test. Results We included 74,847 ambulance runs in 53,937 unique individuals. The most frequent diagnoses were ‘unspecified disease’ (Z039), constituting 47.0 % (n 35,279). In children 0-9 years old, ‘febrile convulsions’ was the most frequent non-specific diagnosis used in 54.3 % (n 1,602). Overall, 1- and 30-day mortality was 2.2 % (n 1,205) and 6.0 % (n 3,258). The highest mortality was in the diagnostic group ‘suspected cardiovascular disease’ (Z035) and ‘unspecified disease’ (Z039) with 1-day mortality 2.6 % (n 43) and 2.4 % (n 589), and 30 day mortality of 6.32 % (n 104) and 8.1 % (n 1,975).Conclusion Among patients calling an ambulance and discharged with non-specific diagnoses the 1- and 30-day mortality, despite modest mortality percentages lead to a high number of deaths.

Download Full-text

Is seronegative rheumatoid arthritis true rheumatoid arthritis? A nationwide cohort study

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keaa623 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Kirsi Paalanen ◽

Kari Puolakka ◽

Elena Nikiphorou ◽

Pekka Hannonen ◽

Tuulikki Sokka

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Social Insurance ◽

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Men And Women ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Icd 10 ◽

Atypical Presentations

Abstract Objectives The classification of seronegative arthritides can be challenging. Our aim was to examine the incidence of SpA diagnosis among patients initially diagnosed as seronegative RA. Methods Using nationwide Finnish registers from social insurance institutions, we identified all adult patients who were diagnosed with incident seronegative RA [International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code M06] from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2014. The patients whose diagnoses subsequently changed to the ICD-10 codes of SpA (M07, M45, M46, K50 and K51) were identified in the national care register, until 31 December 2016. Results A total of 9784 adult seronegative RA patients were identified. Of these, 564 patients had their diagnosis subsequently changed to SpA: 275 (48.7%) patients with PsA, 245 (43.4%) patients with axial SpA and 44 (7.8%) patients with diagnoses related to IBD. The cumulative incidence of SpA diagnoses in 15 years was 10.4% (95% CI 8.9, 12.1) and 8.1% (95% CI 7.1, 9.3) in men and women, respectively. Conclusion This study calls for vigilance in seronegative RA patients, especially those with more atypical presentations, since the diagnosis could change. The possibility of SpA diagnosis should be considered and specifically looked for, as this could impact on management and response to treatment.

Download Full-text

Occurrence, Trends, Management and Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized with Clinically Suspected Myocarditis—Ten-Year Perspectives from the MYO-PL Nationwide Database

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10204672 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (20) ◽

pp. 4672

Author(s):

Krzysztof Ozierański ◽

Agata Tymińska ◽

Marcin Kruk ◽

Beata Koń ◽

Aleksandra Skwarek ◽

...

Keyword(s):

General Population ◽

Survival Rates ◽

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

Primary Diagnosis ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Icd 10 ◽

First Time ◽

Older Males

The epidemiology of myocarditis is unknown and based mainly on small single-centre studies. The study aimed to evaluate the current incidence, clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients hospitalized due to myocarditis in a general population. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04827706). The nationwide MYO-PL (the occurrence, trends, management and outcomes of patients with myocarditis in Poland) database (years 2009–2020) was created to identify hospitalization records with a primary diagnosis of myocarditis according to the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD 10), derived from the database of the national healthcare insurer. We identified 19,978 patients who were hospitalized with suspected myocarditis for the first time, of whom 74% were male. The standardized incidence rate of myocarditis ranged from 1.15 to 14 per 100,000 people depending on the age group and was the highest in patients aged 16–20 years. The overall incidence increased with time. The performance of the recommended diagnostic tests (in particular, endomyocardial biopsy) was low. Relative five-year survival ranged from 0.99 to 0.56—worse in younger females and older males. During a five-year follow-up, 6% of patients (3.7% and 6.9% in females and males, respectively) were re-hospitalized for myocarditis. Surprisingly, females more frequently required hospitalization due to heart failure/cardiomyopathy (10.5%) and atrial fibrillation (5%) than compared to males (7.3% and 2.2%, respectively) in the five-year follow up. In the last ten years, the incidence of suspected myocarditis increased, particularly in males. Survival rates for patients with myocarditis were worse than in the general population. Management of myocarditis requires significant improvement.

Download Full-text

Angststörungen – von der ICD-10 zur ICD-11

Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie ◽

10.1024/1422-4917/a000768 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-5

Author(s):

Timo D. Vloet ◽

Marcel Romanos

Keyword(s):

Mental Disorders ◽

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

International Classification ◽

Statistical Manual ◽

Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Icd 10

Zusammenfassung. Hintergrund: Nach 12 Jahren Entwicklung wird die 11. Version der International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) von der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) im Januar 2022 in Kraft treten. Methodik: Im Rahmen eines selektiven Übersichtsartikels werden die Veränderungen im Hinblick auf die Klassifikation von Angststörungen von der ICD-10 zur ICD-11 zusammenfassend dargestellt. Ergebnis: Die diagnostischen Kriterien der generalisierten Angststörung, Agoraphobie und spezifischen Phobien werden angepasst. Die ICD-11 wird auf Basis einer Lebenszeitachse neu organisiert, sodass die kindesaltersspezifischen Kategorien der ICD-10 aufgelöst werden. Die Trennungsangststörung und der selektive Mutismus werden damit den „regulären“ Angststörungen zugeordnet und können zukünftig auch im Erwachsenenalter diagnostiziert werden. Neu ist ebenso, dass verschiedene Symptomdimensionen der Angst ohne kategoriale Diagnose verschlüsselt werden können. Diskussion: Die Veränderungen im Bereich der Angsterkrankungen umfassen verschiedene Aspekte und sind in der Gesamtschau nicht unerheblich. Positiv zu bewerten ist die Einführung einer Lebenszeitachse und Parallelisierung mit dem Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Schlussfolgerungen: Die entwicklungsbezogene Neuorganisation in der ICD-11 wird auch eine verstärkte längsschnittliche Betrachtung von Angststörungen in der Klinik sowie Forschung zur Folge haben. Damit rückt insbesondere die Präventionsforschung weiter in den Fokus.

Download Full-text

Depression

10.1093/oso/9780198801900.003.0004 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Philip Cowen

Keyword(s):

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

Behavioural Therapy ◽

Historical Background ◽

Cognitive Behavioural ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Icd 10 ◽

Diagnosis And Classification ◽

Modern Experience ◽

Symptoms And Signs

This chapter discusses the symptomatology, diagnosis, and classification of depression. It begins with a brief historical background on depression, tracing its origins to the classical term ‘melancholia’ that describes symptoms and signs now associated with modern concepts of the condition. It then considers the phenomenology of the modern experience of depression, its diagnosis in the operational scheme of ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition), and current classificatory schemes. It looks at the symptoms needed to meet the criteria for ‘depressive episode’ in ICD-10, as well as clinical features of depression with ‘melancholic’ features or ‘somatic depression’ in ICD-10. It also presents an outline of the clinical assessment of an episode of depression before concluding with an overview of issues that need to be taken into account when addressing approaches to treatment, including cognitive behavioural therapy and the administration of antidepressants.

Download Full-text

Neue Terminologie für Sprachentwicklungsstörungen?

Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde ◽

10.1007/s00112-021-01148-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

K. Neumann ◽

B. Arnold ◽

A. Baumann ◽

C. Bohr ◽

H. A. Euler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

International Classification ◽

International Classification Of Disease ◽

Diagnostik Und Therapie ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Icd 10

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Sprachtherapeutisch-linguistische Fachkreise empfehlen die Anpassung einer von einem internationalen Konsortium empfohlenen Änderung der Nomenklatur für Sprachstörungen im Kindesalter, insbesondere für Sprachentwicklungsstörungen (SES), auch für den deutschsprachigen Raum. Fragestellung Ist eine solche Änderung in der Terminologie aus ärztlicher und psychologischer Sicht sinnvoll? Material und Methode Kritische Abwägung der Argumente für und gegen eine Nomenklaturänderung aus medizinischer und psychologischer Sicht eines Fachgesellschaften- und Leitliniengremiums. Ergebnisse Die ICD-10-GM (Internationale statistische Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme, 10. Revision, German Modification) und eine S2k-Leitlinie unterteilen SES in umschriebene SES (USES) und SES assoziiert mit anderen Erkrankungen (Komorbiditäten). Die USES- wie auch die künftige SES-Definition der ICD-11 (International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision) fordern den Ausschluss von Sinnesbehinderungen, neurologischen Erkrankungen und einer bedeutsamen intellektuellen Einschränkung. Diese Definition erscheint weit genug, um leichtere nonverbale Einschränkungen einzuschließen, birgt nicht die Gefahr, Kindern Sprach- und weitere Therapien vorzuenthalten und erkennt das ICD(International Classification of Disease)-Kriterium, nach dem der Sprachentwicklungsstand eines Kindes bedeutsam unter der Altersnorm und unterhalb des seinem Intelligenzalter angemessenen Niveaus liegen soll, an. Die intendierte Ersetzung des Komorbiditäten-Begriffs durch verursachende Faktoren, Risikofaktoren und Begleiterscheinungen könnte die Unterlassung einer dezidierten medizinischen Differenzialdiagnostik bedeuten. Schlussfolgerungen Die vorgeschlagene Terminologie birgt die Gefahr, ätiologisch bedeutsame Klassifikationen und differenzialdiagnostische Grenzen zu verwischen und auf wertvolles ärztliches und psychologisches Fachwissen in Diagnostik und Therapie sprachlicher Störungen im Kindesalter zu verzichten.

Download Full-text

Validation of ICD-10-CM codes for injuries complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium: a medical record review

Injury Prevention ◽

10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043512 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 27 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. i9-i12

Author(s):

Anna Hansen ◽

Dana Quesinberry ◽

Peter Akpunonu ◽

Julia Martin ◽

Svetla Slavova

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Medical Record ◽

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

Medical Record Review ◽

Full Sample ◽

Emergency Department Data ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Icd 10 ◽

Record Review

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes for injury, poisoning, physical or sexual assault complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium (PCP) to capture injury encounters within both hospital and emergency department claims data.MethodsA medical record review was conducted on a sample (n=157) of inpatient and emergency department claims from one Kentucky healthcare system from 2015 to 2017, with any diagnosis in the ICD-10-CM range O9A.2-O9A.4. Study clinicians reviewed medical records for the sampled cases and used an abstraction form to collect information on documented presence of injury and PCP complications. The study estimated the PPVs and the 95% CIs of O9A.2-O9A.4 codes for (1) capturing injuries and (2) capturing injuries complicating PCP.ResultsThe estimated PPV for the codes O9A.2-O9A.4 to identify injury in the full sample was 79.6% (95% CI 73.3% to 85.9%) and the PPV for capturing injuries complicating PCP was 72.0% (95% CI 65.0% to 79.0%). The estimated PPV for an inpatient principal diagnosis O9A.2-O9A.4 to capture injuries was 90.7% (95% CI 82.0% to 99.4%) and the PPV for capturing injuries complicating PCP was 88.4% (95% CI 78.4% to 98.4%). The estimated PPV for any mention of O9A.2-O9A.4 in emergency department data to capture injuries was 95.2% (95% CI 90.6% to 99.9%) and the PPV for capturing injuries complicating PCP was 81.0% (95% CI 72.4% to 89.5%).DiscussionThe O9A.2-O9A.4 codes captured high percentage true injury cases among pregnant and puerperal women.

Download Full-text

Impact of ICD-9 to ICD-10 Coding Transition on Prevalence Trends in Neurology

Neurology Clinical Practice ◽

10.1212/cpj.0000000000001046 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (5) ◽

pp. e612-e619

Author(s):

Ali G. Hamedani ◽

Leah Blank ◽

Dylan P. Thibault ◽

Allison W. Willis

Keyword(s):

Time Series ◽

Status Epilepticus ◽

Interrupted Time Series ◽

International Classification Of Diseases ◽

Disease Prevalence ◽

Rate Of Change ◽

International Classification ◽

Classification Of Diseases ◽

Icd 10

ObjectiveTo determine the effect of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coding transition on the point prevalence and longitudinal trends of 16 neurologic diagnoses.MethodsWe used 2014–2017 data from the National Inpatient Sample to identify hospitalizations with one of 16 common neurologic diagnoses. We used published ICD-9-CM codes to identify hospitalizations from January 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015, and used the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's MapIt tool to convert them to equivalent ICD-10-CM codes for October 1, 2015–December 31, 2017. We compared the prevalence of each diagnosis before vs after the ICD coding transition using logistic regression and used interrupted time series regression to model the longitudinal change in disease prevalence across time.ResultsThe average monthly prevalence of subarachnoid hemorrhage was stable before the coding transition (average monthly increase of 4.32 admissions, 99.7% confidence interval [CI]: −8.38 to 17.01) but increased after the coding transition (average monthly increase of 24.32 admissions, 99.7% CI: 15.71–32.93). Otherwise, there were no significant differences in the longitudinal rate of change in disease prevalence over time between ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM. Six of 16 neurologic diagnoses (37.5%) experienced significant changes in cross-sectional prevalence during the coding transition, most notably for status epilepticus (odds ratio 0.30, 99.7% CI: 0.26–0.34).ConclusionsThe transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM coding affects prevalence estimates for status epilepticus and other neurologic disorders, a potential source of bias for future longitudinal neurologic studies. Studies should limit to 1 coding system or use interrupted time series models to adjust for changes in coding patterns until new neurology-specific ICD-9 to ICD-10 conversion maps can be developed.

Download Full-text