A structure for government requirements in public–private partnerships

2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 891-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Abdel-Aziz ◽  
A D Russell
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Public Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Transportation Projects

A spectrum of requirements for the procurement of public infrastructure under various public–private partnership arrangements has been communicated by governments to the private sector participants. This paper suggests a structure for these requirements and demonstrates how they have been realized in public–private partnership projects. Government requirements are categorized and described under a structure of three dimensions: rights, obligations, and liabilities. Each dimension is further defined and explained through a number of attributes. The structure provides insights as to the basis for the different modes under public–private partnerships such as build–operate–transfer, build–own–operate–transfer, and build–transfer–operate. The structure is used to examine government requirements in a number of public–private partnership transportation projects. The results show that, for each dimension and its related attributes, comprehensive and clear articulation of government requirements is generally needed. This will reduce the amount of supplemental materials issued for the request for proposals, help consortiums in responding with proposals that can fit the requirements and reduce the amount of time spent in negotiations and (or) the need for contract amendments to reflect marketplace realities missed earlier.Key words: public–private partnerships, concessions, development agreements, franchise agreements, transportation projects.

scholarly journals THE DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN REGIONAL ECONOMY OF RUSSIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Author(s):  
Ирина Прядко ◽  
Irina Pryadko ◽  
Татьяна Синицына ◽  
Tatyana Sinicyna
Keyword(s):  
Regional Economy ◽  
Influence Factors ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Public Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Rostov Region

In this article the relevance and economic goals of public-private partnership (PPP) implementation in Russia are defined. The analysis of the realization of PPP projects for public infrastructure creation is carried out. The regions-leaders by the level of PPP development in Russia and the Southern Federal district are identified. The study of the public-private partnerships sphere in the Rostov region is conducted. The influence factors and the basic directions of increase of PPP mechanisms efficiency in the regional economy are considered.

scholarly journals Public–Private Partnership Monitor: Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Energy Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public Infrastructure ◽  
Related Services ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private Sector Investment ◽  
Total Investment ◽  
The Government

The Government of Pakistan strongly supports public–private partnership (PPP) initiatives. From 1990 to 2019, Pakistan witnessed 108 financially closed PPP projects, with a total investment of approximately $28.4 billion. About 88% of these projects are in the energy sector, attracting more than $24.7billion, followed by investments in the port sector. In early 2021, Parliament approved the amendments to the 2017 PPP Law, enacting the Public Private Partnership Authority (Amendment) Act 2021. This further strengthens the enabling legal and regulatory framework for developing and implementing PPPs, thereby promoting private sector investment in public infrastructure and related services.

scholarly journals Stakeholder engagement and the future of Irish public–private partnerships

2020 ◽  
pp. 002085232097169
Author(s):  
Gail Sheppard ◽  
Matthias Beck
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Stakeholder Engagement ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Organisational Identity ◽  
Mutual Accountability ◽  
Education Justice

Building on recent works that stress the importance of stakeholder engagement in partnerships, we propose a novel benchmarking framework for the evaluation of public–private partnerships. This framework describes mutuality and the preservation of organisational identity as the ideal characteristics of partnerships because they, in turn, encourage stakeholder support for public–private partnerships. Applying this framework to infrastructure public–private partnerships in Ireland, we note that mutual accountability has been weakened following the financial crisis. Meanwhile, consultation with clients such as key public–private partnership stakeholders, which would help articulate organisational identities, remains patchy across the education, justice and health public–private partnership that we investigate. Nonetheless, there are sectoral differences. In education, consultation centres on school principals while ignoring teaching staff and trade unions. In justice, attention is focused primarily on judges. Similarly, in health sector public–private partnerships, there is a strong focus on clinicians. Overall, private sector-driven consultation efforts are primarily pragmatic, with a focus on preventing delays and the dissatisfaction of key clients who could prevent future projects from materialising. We suggest that the combination of this calculated approach to consultation, together with the delegation of public–private partnership contracting to an arm’s-length government agency, is likely to promote a similar depoliticisation of Irish public–private partnerships as has been observed in other countries. We argue that the potentially harmful stakeholder disengagement that this might encourage can be addressed through a concerted set of measures focusing on improved transparency of decision-making, as well as frameworks that mandate client and public consultation. Points for practitioners Research has highlighted the importance of mutual accountability and the preservation of organisational identity in ensuring that public–private partnerships attract public participation and receive public approval. We investigate public–private partnerships in education, justice and health in Ireland, a country that is widely considered an exemplary public–private partnership practitioner. We observe that consultation by private sector public–private partnership participants with client organisations in these sectors is largely motivated by a desire to prevent hold-ups and secure future business rather than seeking to engage with a broad range of users and stakeholders. Together with the existing lack of evidence of benefits from public–private partnerships, this situation is likely to lead to dissatisfaction with the policy. Indeed, political parties critical of public–private partnerships have been able to significantly increase their share of the vote in a recent national election. Our conclusion is that such dissatisfaction is avoidable if the Irish government improves transparency around public–private partnership decision-making while strengthening requirements for public and client consultation.

scholarly journals KAJIAN URGENSI PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS DI KOTA BANDUNG

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-149
Author(s):  
Mary Ismowati
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
City Government ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Technical Literature ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
The City

Bandung city government's desire to work on various projects with a mechanism of Public Private Partnerships ( PPP ) due to limitations of the government for the city of Bandung well within the capability of funding, human resources , technological capabilities , and so forth . This is done to help realize the " Bandung Champion " . City government 's desire based on the opinion the Government is obliged to fulfill its social responsibility to the community economy , and to ensure that public services can be done to the entire community.The aim in this paper to analyze the cooperation scheme of Public Private Partnerships ( PPP ) what is right for the city government The method used in this paper is a descriptive study with technical literature , ie finding relevant theory reference to the case or the problems found , namely the problem of public private partnership cooperation city government with the private sector in the provision of public services . This type of data is secondary data obtained from the documentation media and internet and also sourced from books and other literature sources that support the discussion in this study.In order for the cooperation of public private partnership city government with the private sector managed a few things that must be considered: this cooperation must be strategically important for both parties , this cooperation are complementary rather than mutually competence , openness to information in both parties , and should this cooperation raises link although the true integration of different cultures . Mutual trust is the main thing. Forms of cooperation of public private partnership with the city government to the private sector in the form of contract maintenance , Leasing ( Lease ) or Contract of Build- Operate- Transfer / BOT or Build Operate and Transfer OwnedIt was concluded that the Public -Private Partnership cooperation is not always a bad connotation and in order to succeed , a lot of terms and conditions must be met . It is intended that the government gets the best results , people also get results commensurate , ie welfare . Thus , the spirit of Public -Private Partnership is to strengthen the government or the public service which is considered inefficient 

scholarly journals Enhancing the Macedonian Health System through Implementation of the Public-Private Partnership Model

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr.Sc. Iskra Belazelkoska Borizovska ◽  
Dr.Sc. Ljubomir Kekenovski
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Health System ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Partnership Model

The research involves determination of the extent to which the public-private partnership model can contribute to the improvement and enhancement of the healthcare services in Macedonia. To achieve this purpose, the research embraces comprehension of the common advantages and disadvantages of this model, encompassed with a case study of the public-private partnership in the specialized-consultative health protection for the health activity-dialysis, together with other efforts to ensure high quality health protection. It also reflects the attitudes of the public authorities and private sector entities regarding the significance of the public-private partnership model, consideration of the advantages and disadvantages before entering public-private partnerships and the ways public-private partnerships affect the employees and employments.The study outlines planned and realised efforts to implement this model to ensure better and more efficient healthcare system.Generally, the results from the survey and the outlined case study present this model as good solution for many healthcare challenges, since public-private partnerships offer different services to the citizens that neither the public nor the private sector could separately achieve. The public-private partnership model leads to new employment opportunities according to the opinion of the public authorities, while the private sector entities consider that public-private partnerships increase the responsibility of the employees in such partnership in comparison to the public sector. The outlined case study is an example of successful public-private partnership model in the field of healthcare and can serve as motivation for further implementation of this model to ensure better, enhanced and modern health system.

scholarly journals DIFFERENT PERCEPTIONS OF CONCERN FACTORS FOR STRATEGIC INVESTMENT OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-86
Author(s):  
Do Tien Sy ◽  
Veerasak Likhitruangsilp ◽  
Masamitsu Onishi ◽  
Phong Thanh Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Risk Perceptions ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Political Risks ◽  
Transportation Projects ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
Private Investors

This paper identifies the concern factors of private investors associated with Public-Private Partnership (PPP) transportation projects in Vietnam. The concern factors are incorporated into four main groups: (1) company profile; (2) finance; (3) opportunities; and (4) risk perceptions. The paper examines the different perceptions by the public and private sectors about these concern factors adopted by experienced professionals related to PPP transportation projects. Based on a questionnaire survey in Vietnam, the most concern factors of private investors are their own capacity, demand issues, legal and political risks, long-term income, and financial sources issues of the PPP project. Moreover, five factors that represent the significant differences between the private and public sectors including political risks, enhancement of company’s strength in its industry, construction risks, demand issues, and financial viability of the company are also discovered. Addressing the different perceptions is indispensable to ensure the public sector can establish necessary policies that appeal to both domestic and foreign private investors. The paper at the same time hopes to provide some of lessons for the private sector.

scholarly journals Public Private Partnership in livestock sector of Bangladesh

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-178
Author(s):  
SS Husain ◽  
MR Amin
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Inclusive Growth ◽  
Public Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Policy And Strategy ◽  
Livestock Sector ◽  
The People ◽  
Trained Personnel ◽  
The Government

In Bangladesh the concept of Public Private Partnership (PPP) has been launched very recently. In view of the present need of the country, the Government of Bangladesh issued the Policy and Strategy for Public Private Partnership (PPP) in August 2010, to facilitate the development of core sector public infrastructure and services vital for the people of Bangladesh (Bangladesh Gazette, additional 2010). The PPP program is part of the Government's Vision 2021 goal to ensure a more rapid, inclusive growth trajectory, and to better meet the need for enhanced, high quality public services in a fiscally sustainable manner. It is very practical to understand that only public or private sector along could not able to cope with all the essential needs of the country. It is also eventually true that there are almost equally distributed trained personnel in both the field having variable opportunities. Government resources are not enough always to run huge development of the country. On the other hand it is not always possible for the private sector to start with the view to build up all the facilities alone to meet up the demand of the nation. Thus PPP has been termed as effective vehicle for the integrated development of the country.Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 2017. 46 (3): 172-178

Role of Public–Private Partnerships in delivering Health Care Services in India

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 116-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Medhavi Agarwal ◽  
Ruchi Tanwar
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Seek Health Care ◽  
Care Services

ABSTRACT A public–private partnership (PPP) is a contractual arrangement between a private sector and a government sector. Through this agreement, the skills and assets of each other are shared in delivering a service or facility for use of general public. In recent years, there have been many initiatives to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and equity in provision of health care services in the country. Public–private partnership is one such initiative. Public–private partnership is the first step toward the health care services to improve quality, efficiency, accessibility, availability, acceptability, and equity of the services. It strengthens the existing health system by improving management of health within the government infrastructure and mobilizes the additional resources. Private sector is the most important source of health care services in India, providing maximum health services to the population. In absence of effective public health system, majority of household seek health care from nongovernment sectors. Various partnerships are being pursued under the existing program of ministry, especially RCH-2, independently by the state under their own resources. How to cite this article Tanwar R, Ojha R, Agarwal M, Singh A, Joshi HS. Role of Public–Private Partnerships in delivering Health Care Services in India. Int J Adv Integ Med Sci 2016;1(3):116-118.

scholarly journals Public-private partnership: the process of formation and development

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
B.O. Ahataeva ◽  
◽  
R.A. Nurtazina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Policy Mechanisms

The article discusses the theoretical aspects of public-private partnership: goals, objectives, regulation through the improvement of public policy mechanisms. A discourse is being made on the formation of public-private partnerships and the effectiveness of the mechanism of relations between the state and the private sector on the example of foreign countries and Kazakhstan.

Public–private partnerships

2019 ◽  
pp. 429-444
Author(s):  
John Child ◽  
David Faulkner ◽  
Stephen Tallman ◽  
Linda Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Public Private Partnerships ◽  
The Political ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Political Situation ◽  
Success Criteria ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Uk

Chapter 20 discusses public–private partnerships (PPPs) between government and major corporations. Generally, in PPPs the government sets the task and agrees the fee, while the private sector does the work and incurs the costs whilst receiving a contractually agreed profit. The project is normally building a major infrastructure facility. This arrangement has been very popular in the UK until recently, as well as in many other countries. In the USA a strong lobby is advocating the increased use of PPPs to update the country’s infrastructure. The chapter notes that the idea of public–private partnership is a good one in principle, but that scandals of excess profits (and sometimes losses) can result from deficiencies in negotiation and implementation. The chapter also considers success criteria for PPPs and concludes that they vary according to the political situation and hence motivation in the country in question.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document