scholarly journals A Nomogram Prediction of Length of Hospital Stay in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Kang Li ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Ling Qin ◽  
Chaoran Zang ◽  
Ang Li ◽  
...  

Assessing the length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is helpful in optimizing the use efficiency of hospital beds and medical resources and relieving medical resource shortages. This retrospective cohort study of 97 patients was conducted at Beijing You’An Hospital between January 21, 2020, and March 21, 2020. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression based on the smallest Akaike information criterion value was used to select demographic and clinical variables to construct a nomogram. Discrimination, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and Kaplan–Meier curves with the log-rank test were used to assess the nomogram model. The median LOS was 13 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 10–18). Age, alanine aminotransferase, pneumonia, platelet count, and PF ratio (PaO2/FiO2) were included in the final model. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.76 ( 95 % confidence   interval   CI = 0.69 – 0.83 ), and the AUC was 0.88 ( 95 % CI = 0.82 – 0.95 ). The adjusted C-index was 0.75 ( 95 % CI = 0.67 – 0.82 ) and adjusted AUC 0.86 ( 95 % CI = 0.73 – 0.95 ), both after 1000 bootstrap cross internal validations. A Brier score of 0.11 ( 95 % CI = 0.07 – 0.15 ) and adjusted Brier score of 0.130 ( 95 % CI = 0.07 – 0.20 ) for the calibration curve showed good agreement. The AUC values for the nomogram at LOS of 10, 20, and 30 days were 0.79 ( 95 % CI = 0.69 – 0.89 ), 0.89 ( 95 % CI = 0.83 – 0.96 ), and 0.96 ( 95 % CI = 0.92 – 1.00 ), respectively, and the high fit score of the nomogram model indicated a high probability of hospital stay. These results confirmed that the nomogram model accurately predicted the LOS of patients with COVID-19. We developed and validated a nomogram that incorporated five independent predictors of LOS. If validated in a future large cohort study, the model may help to optimize discharge strategies and, thus, shorten LOS in patients with COVID-19.

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiacheng He

Abstract Purpose Creatinine to body weight (Cre/BW) ratio is considered the independent risk factor for incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but research on this relationship is limited. The relationship between the Cre/BW ratio and T2DM among Chinse individuals is still ambiguous. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the Cre/BW ratio and the risk of T2DM in the Chinese population. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected database. We included a total of 200,658 adults free of T2DM at baseline. The risk of incident T2DM according to Cre/BW ratio was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and a two-piece wise linear regression model was developed to find out the threshold effect. Results With a median follow-up of 3.13 ± 0.94 years, a total of 4001 (1.99%) participants developed T2DM. Overall, there was an L-shaped relation of Cre/BW ratio with the risk of incident T2DM (P for non-linearity < 0.001). When the Cre/BW ratio (× 100) was less than 0.86, the risk of T2DM decreased significantly as the Cre/BW ratio increased [0.01 (0.00, 0.10), P < 0.001]. When the Cre/BW ratio (× 100) was between 0.86 and 1.36, the reduction in the risk of developing T2DM was not as significant as before [0.22 (0.12, 0.38), P < 0.001]. In contrast, when the Cre/BW ratio (× 100) was greater than 1.36, the reduction in T2DM incidence became significantly flatter than before [0.73 (0.29,1.8), P = 0.49]. Conclusion There was an L-shaped relation of Cre/BW ratio with incidence of T2DM in general Chinese adults. A negative curvilinear association between Cre/BW ratio and incident T2DM was present, with a saturation effect predicted at 0.86 and 1.36 of Cre/BW ratio (× 100).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel I. Paredes ◽  
Stephanie Lunn ◽  
Michael Famulare ◽  
Lauren A. Frisbie ◽  
Ian Painter ◽  
...  

Background: The COVID–19 pandemic is now dominated by variant lineages; the resulting impact on disease severity remains unclear. Using a retrospective cohort study, we assessed the risk of hospitalization following infection with nine variants of concern or interest (VOC/VOI). Methods: Our study includes individuals with positive SARS–CoV–2 RT PCR in the Washington Disease Reporting System and with available viral genome data, from December 1, 2020 to July 30, 2021. The main analysis was restricted to cases with specimens collected through sentinel surveillance. Using a Cox proportional hazards model with mixed effects, we estimated hazard ratios (HR) for the risk of hospitalization following infection with a VOC/VOI, adjusting for age, sex, and vaccination status. Findings: Of the 27,814 cases, 23,170 (83.3%) were sequenced through sentinel surveillance, of which 726 (3.1%) were hospitalized due to COVID–19. Higher hospitalization risk was found for infections with Gamma (HR 3.17, 95% CI 2.15–4.67), Beta (HR: 2.97, 95% CI 1.65–5.35), Delta (HR: 2.30, 95% CI 1.69–3.15), and Alpha (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26–1.99) compared to infections with an ancestral lineage. Following VOC infection, unvaccinated patients show a similar higher hospitalization risk, while vaccinated patients show no significant difference in risk, both when compared to unvaccinated, ancestral lineage cases. Interpretation: Infection with a VOC results in a higher hospitalization risk, with an active vaccination attenuating that risk. Our findings support promoting hospital preparedness, vaccination, and robust genomic surveillance.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 3150
Author(s):  
Enrica Migliore ◽  
Amelia Brunani ◽  
Giovannino Ciccone ◽  
Eva Pagano ◽  
Simone Arolfo ◽  
...  

Bariatric surgery (BS) confers a survival benefit in specific subsets of patients with severe obesity; otherwise, effects on hospital admissions are still uncertain. We assessed the long-term effect on mortality and on hospitalization of BS in patients with severe obesity. This was a retrospective cohort study, including all patients residing in Piedmont (age 18–60 years, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) admitted during 2002–2018 to the Istituto Auxologico Italiano. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for BS were estimated for mortality and hospitalization, considering surgery as a time-varying variable. Out of 2285 patients, 331 (14.5%) underwent BS; 64.4% received sleeve gastrectomy (SG), 18.7% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and 16.9% adjustable gastric banding (AGB). After 10-year follow-up, 10 (3%) and 233 (12%) patients from BS and non-BS groups died, respectively (HR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.27–0.98, by a multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression model). In patients undergoing SG or RYGB, the hospitalization probability decreased significantly in the after-BS group (HR = 0.77; 0.68–0.88 and HR = 0.78; 0.63–0.98, respectively) compared to non-BS group. When comparing hospitalization risk in the BS group only, a marked reduction after surgery was found for all BS types. In conclusion, BS significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization after 10-year follow-up.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4091
Author(s):  
Björn Weiss ◽  
David Hilfrich ◽  
Gerald Vorderwülbecke ◽  
Maria Heinrich ◽  
Julius J. Grunow ◽  
...  

The benzodiazepine, midazolam, is one of the most frequently used sedatives in intensive care medicine, but it has an unfavorable pharmacokinetic profile when continuously applied. As a consequence, patients are frequently prolonged and more deeply sedated than intended. Due to its distinct pharmacological features, including a cytochrome P450-independent metabolization, intravenous lormetazepam might be clinically advantageous compared to midazolam. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared patients who received either intravenous lormetazepam or midazolam with respect to their survival and sedation characteristics. The cohort included 3314 mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients that received one of the two drugs in a tertiary medical center in Germany between 2006 and 2018. A Cox proportional hazards model with mortality as outcome and APACHE II, age, gender, and admission mode as covariates revealed a hazard ratio of 1.75 [95% CI 1.46–2.09; p < 0.001] for in-hospital mortality associated with the use of midazolam. After additionally adjusting for sedation intensity, the HR became 1.04 [95% CI 0.83–1.31; p = 0.97]. Thus, we concluded that excessive sedation occurs more frequently in critically ill patients treated with midazolam than in patients treated with lormetazepam. These findings require further investigation in prospective trials to assess if lormetazepam, due to its ability to maintain light sedation, might be favorable over other benzodiazepines for sedation in the ICU.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Hoon Lim ◽  
Jang-Hee Cho ◽  
Yena Jeon ◽  
Ji Hye Kim ◽  
Ga Young Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract We investigated the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and the risk of mortality in hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients. A retrospective cohort study was performed on all hospitalized COVID-19 patients in tertiary hospitals in Daegu, Korea. Patients were classified based on whether they received ACE-I or ARB before COVID-19 diagnosis. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for the analysis of survival. Of 130 COVID-19 patients, 30 (23.1%) who received ACE-I or ARB showed an increased the risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.44; P = 0.038). ACE-I or ARB were also associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome or mechanical ventilation (adjusted OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.18 to 9.69; P = 0.024), and acute kidney injury or shock (adjusted OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.04 to 7.56; P = 0.042). Among the patients with ACE-I or ARB, 14 (46.7%) discontinued the therapy and the cessation was associated with a higher mortality rate. ACE-I or ARB therapy in severe COVID-19 patients was associated with occurrence of severe complications and increased in-hospital mortality. Discontinuation of ACE-I or ARB in patients with more severe COVID-19 was not associated with improvement of mortality.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e021747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chien-Hsueh Tung ◽  
Ning-Sheng Lai ◽  
Chung-Yi Li ◽  
Shiang-Jiun Tsai ◽  
Yen-Chun Chen ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo illuminate the association between interferon-based therapy (IBT) and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV).Design, setting, participants and interventionsThis retrospective cohort study used Taiwan’s Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 that included 18 971 patients with HCV infection between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2012. We identified 1966 patients with HCV infection who received IBT (treated cohort) and used 1:4 propensity score-matching to select 7864 counterpart controls who did not receive IBT (untreated cohort).Outcome measuresAll study participants were followed until the end of 2012 to calculate the incidence rate and risk of incident RA.ResultsDuring the study period, 305 RA events (3.1%) occurred. The incidence rate of RA was significantly lower in the treated cohort than the untreated cohort (4.0 compared with 5.5 per 1000 person-years, p<0.018), and the adjusted HR remained significant at 0.63 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.94, p=0.023) in a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Multivariate stratified analyses revealed that the attenuation in RA risk was greater in men (0.35; 0.15 to 0.81, p=0.014) and men<60 years (0.29; 0.09 to 0.93, p=0.036).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that IBT may reduce the risk of RA and contributes to growing evidence that HCV infection may lead to development of RA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Hou ◽  
Li Tian ◽  
Lei Zhou ◽  
Xinhua Jia ◽  
Li Kong ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major challenge facing the world. Certain guidelines issued by National Health Commission of the People's Repubilic of China recommend intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for adjuvant treatment of COVID-19. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence to support the use of IVIG. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study included all adult patients with laboratory-confirmed severe COVID-19 in the Respiratory and Critical Care Unit of Dabie Mountain Regional Medical Center, China. Patient information, including demographic data, laboratory indicators, the use of glucocorticoids and IVIG, hospital mortality, the application of mechanical ventilation, and the length of hospital stay was collected. The primary outcome was the composite end point, including death and the use of mechanical ventilation. The secondary outcome was the length of hospital stay. Results Of the 285 patients with confirmed COVID-19, 113 severely ill patients were included in this study. Compared to the non-IVIG group, more patients in the IVIG group reached the composite end point [12 (25.5%) vs 5 (7.6%), P = 0.008] and had longer hospital stay periods [23.0 (19.0–31.0) vs 16.0 (13.8–22.0), P < 0.001]. After adjusting for confounding factors, differences in primary outcomes between the two groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.167), however, patients in the IVIG group had longer hospital stay periods (P = 0.041). Conclusion Adjuvant therapy with IVIG did not improve in-hospital mortality rates or the need for mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 patients. Our study does not support the use of immunoglobulin in patients with severe COVID-19 patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan Chien ◽  
Khurram Khan ◽  
Lewis Gall ◽  
Liam Deboys ◽  
Carol Craig ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pre-operative anaemia is associated with increased length of hospital stay, requirement for allogenic blood transfusion, post-operative complications and mortality. Oesophagectomy is a complex procedure associated with significant physiological insult, thus pre-operative patient optimisation is imperative to improve clinical outcomes. This study aimed to determine the impact of pre-operative anaemia on short-term outcomes following oesophagectomy for benign and malignant disease.  Methods A retrospective cohort study of all oesophagectomies performed in a single tertiary referral centre between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019 was performed. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected database and individual patient electronic records were interrogated. Patients were dichotomised into two groups, based on the most recent pre-operative haemoglobin. Patients with pre-operative anaemia (haemoglobin &lt;130mg/L in males and &lt;120mg/L in females) were compared to those without pre-operative anaemia. Patients with missing data were excluded from the study. Patients were followed up for a median of 32 months (IQR 18-66). Results Of 352 patients eligible for inclusion, 173 (49.1%) patients were anaemic immediately pre-operatively. Patients with pre-operative anaemia were older (66 vs. 64 years, p = 0.031), with a lower anaerobic threshold (11.7 vs. 12.3ml/min/kg, p = 0.011), and were significantly more likely to have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (91.3% vs. 78.8%, p &lt; 0.001). Patient comorbidities and disease-related characteristics were similar between the two groups. Patients with pre-operative anaemia were significantly more likely to require post-operative blood transfusion (34.7% vs. 16.8%; p &lt; 0.001). However, pre-operative anaemia was not associated with increased post-operative complications, intensive care admission, length of hospital stay, or 30- and 90-day mortality rates following oesophagectomy. Conclusions Patients with anaemia immediately prior to undergoing an oesophagectomy were significantly more likely to require post-operative blood transfusion. However, pre-operative anaemia was not associated with an increased rate of post-operative morbidity or mortality. In addition, pre-operative iron transfusion is becoming increasingly utilised to minimise the incidence of pre-operative anaemia: this was not analysed in this study.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e023594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gijs Van Pottelbergh ◽  
Pavlos Mamouris ◽  
Nele Opdeweegh ◽  
Bert Vaes ◽  
Geert Goderis ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo examine if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope over a 5-year period is related to incident cardiovascular (CV) events in the following 5 years.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingPrimary care.ParticipantsAll patients aged ≥50 years with at least four eGFR measurements between 01 January 2006 and 31 December 2010 were included in the study.Outcome measuresDuring the follow-up period (01 January 2011 until 31 December 2015), CV events (acute myocardial infarction, stroke (cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischemic attack (TIA)), peripheral arterial disease and acute heart failure) were identified.MethodsThe slope was calculated by the least square method (in mL/min/year). The following slope categories were considered: (−1 to 1), (−3 to −1) (−5 to −3), ≤−5, (1 to 3), (3 to 5) and ≥5.00 mL/min/year. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between eGFR slope and incidence of CV events. Survival probability from CV events was estimated per slope category.Results19 567 patients had at least four eGFR measurements, of whom 52% was female. 12% of the ≤−5 slope category developed a new CV event in comparison to 7.8% of the reference group and 5.4% of the ≥5 slope category. Survival rates were worst in those with a slope ≤−5. Patients with a slope of (−5 to −3) and ≤−5 had an adjusted HR of 1.37 and 1.55, respectively. Most patients with a slope <−3 mL/min had an eGFR still >60 mL/min.ConclusionsNegative eGFR slopes of at least 3 mL/min/year give irrespectively of the eGFR itself a higher risk of CV events compared with patient groups with stable or improved kidney function. So the eGFR slope identifies an easy to define group of patients with a high risk for developing CV events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document