Abstract 3950: Optimization of a method for FACS analysis of checkpoint receptor expression on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in clinical tumor samples

Author(s):  
Norman Zhang ◽  
Qiyao Zhang ◽  
Yan Liu ◽  
Juntao Yu ◽  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 5714
Author(s):  
Gwan Hee Han ◽  
Ilseon Hwang ◽  
Hanbyoul Cho ◽  
Kris Ylaya ◽  
Jung-A Choi ◽  
...  

Hormone receptor expression patterns often correlate with infiltration of specific lymphocytes in tumors. Specifically, the presence of specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with particular hormone receptor expression is reportedly associated with breast cancer, however, this has not been revealed in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Therefore, we investigated the association between hormone receptor expression and TILs in EOC. Here we found that ERα, AR, and GR expression increased in EOC, while PR was significantly reduced and ERβ expression showed a reduced trend compared to normal epithelium. Cluster analysis indicated poor disease-free survival (DFS) in AR+/GR+/PR+ subgroup (triple dominant group); while the Cox proportional-hazards model highlighted the triple dominant group as an independent prognostic factor for DFS. In addition, significant upregulation of FoxP3+ TILs, PD-1, and PD-L1 was observed in the triple dominant group compared to other groups. NanoString analyses further suggested that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and/or NF-κB signaling pathways were activated with significant upregulation of RELA, MAP3K5, TNFAIP3, BCL2L1, RIPK1, TRAF2, PARP1, and AKT1 in the triple dominant EOC group. The triple dominant subgroup correlates with poor prognosis in EOC. Moreover, the TNF and/or NF-κB signaling pathways may be responsible for hormone-mediated inhibition of the immune microenvironment.


2020 ◽  
pp. e2020029
Author(s):  
Andrea Pontara ◽  
Giovanni Paolino ◽  
Vanesa Gregorc ◽  
Santo Raffaele Mercuri ◽  
Alessandra Bulotta ◽  
...  

Background: Malignant melanoma (MM) is potentially the most dangerous form of skin tumor. In the last few years, the so-called TAM receptors, a unique family of tyrosine kinase (TK) receptors, have become increasingly important. Objectives: To evaluate Mer and Axl TAM receptor expression to find clinicopathological features that could explain the biological behavior of MM. Patients and Methods: Clinicopathological data were obtained from an MM electronic database at our Institute. We reviewed 24 cutaneous MM specimens. TAM receptor expression was assayed using immunohistochemistry. Combinative semiquantitative scoring was used for the evaluation of TAM receptor expression (MerTK and AxlTK). Appropriate statistical methods were used to evaluate a possible correlation between TAM receptor expression and the clinicopathological variables of the MM samples (univariate analysis and multivariate analysis). Results: MerTK and AxlTK were expressed differently in the MM samples, with a major expression of the first receptor. The cells of the tumor microenvironment contributed to the majority of the total score. A significant association was found between AxlScore and the site of the tumor and between AxlScore and the variable ulceration; another correlation was found between MerScore and the following characteristics: pathological stage of the tumor (pT), sex, ulceration, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusions: All correlations between the expression of MerTK and AxlTK with the clinical and histological variables of MM should be validated in a large group of people in order to increase the validity and the impact of our observations, with subsequently therapeutic implications in the era of the “targeted therapy.”


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 673-673
Author(s):  
Amir Ishaq Khan ◽  
Caroline Stewart Jansen ◽  
Jennifer Wilkinson Carlisle ◽  
Kevin Richard Melnick ◽  
Kyu Seo Kim ◽  
...  

673 Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been shown to be a genetically and morphologically heterogeneous cancer. As studies show the significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in cancer, it is critical to examine how the phenotype of TILs manifests in RCC. Such analysis may help explain the role of the immune landscape in developing resistance and its contribution to the high treatment failure observed in immunotherapy for RCC. This study compares the immune phenotype of primary tumors, venous tumor thrombi (VTT), and metastases, as well as multiple sites within primary tumors, and investigates whether inter- and intra-tumoral immune heterogeneity is present in RCC. The association of TIL levels and clinical prognosis will also be assessed and compared with current RCC prognostic scores. Methods: Our cohort included 15 VTT and 6 metastases (3 adrenal, 2 bone, 1 liver) with 20 matched primary tumors, as well as 25 non-metastatic primary tumors. The RCC tissue was collected and digested into single cell suspensions. Suspensions were stained for TIL surface markers and processed using flow cytometry. The data was analyzed to capture %CD8+ and %CD4+ in total tumor. The %CD28+ and %PD1+ of CD8+ cells were measured to describe the co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory receptor expression, respectively. Clinical data was obtained to calculate the Mayo Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis (SSIGN) and UCLA Integrated Staging System (UISS) scores for each patient and to evaluate recurrence. Results: Immunologic concordance was observed in all measured parameters (%CD8+, %CD4+, %CD28+, and %PD1+) for primary tumors and VTT, for primary tumors and their metastases, and for different sites within 10 primary tumors. In our overall cohort, %CD8+ was found to be inversely associated with recurrence (p = 0.02). Furthermore, %CD8+ was not significantly associated with patient Mayo SSIGN and UISS scores. Conclusions: Despite the genetic and morphologic heterogeneity seen in RCC, immunologic concordance was observed for both inter- and intra-tumoral analysis. The association between %CD8+ and recurrence presents a novel and objective immune-based prognostic factor for RCC, independent of Mayo SSIGN and UISS scores.


Author(s):  
Kristen R. Spencer ◽  
Jianfeng Wang ◽  
Ann W. Silk ◽  
Shridar Ganesan ◽  
Howard L. Kaufman ◽  
...  

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer therapy and has been named the cancer advance of the year for 2016. Checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated unprecedented rates of durable responses in some of the most difficult-to-treat cancers; however, many treated patients do not respond, and the potential for serious side effects exists. There is a growing need to identify biomarkers that will improve the selection of patients who will best respond to therapy, further elucidate drug mechanisms of action, and help tailor therapy regimens. Biomarkers are being explored at the soluble, cellular, and genomic levels, and examples in immunotherapy include serum proteins, tumor-specific receptor expression patterns, factors in the tumor microenvironment, circulating immune and tumor cells, and host genomic factors. The search for reliable biomarkers is limited by our incomplete understanding of how immunotherapies modify the already complex immune response to cancer, as well as the contribution of immuno-editing to a dynamic and inducible tumor microenvironment and immune milieu. Furthermore, there has been little extension of any candidate assay into large, prospective studies, and the lack of standardization in measurement and interpretation restricts their validity. Both tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression within the tumor microenvironment have been recognized as having both prognostic and predictive value for patients treated with immunotherapy. Alternately, a larger panel of gene signatures, chemokines, and other factors that correlate with response has been proposed. In this article, we will explore the status of current biomarker candidates.


BIO-PROTOCOL ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Perret ◽  
Sophie Sierro ◽  
Natalia Botelho ◽  
Stephanie Corgnac ◽  
Alena Donda ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 704-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Vassilakopoulou ◽  
Margaritis Avgeris ◽  
Vamsidhar Velcheti ◽  
Vassiliki Kotoula ◽  
Theodore Rampias ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A378-A378
Author(s):  
Antonio Jimeno ◽  
Sophie Papa ◽  
Missak Haigentz ◽  
Juan Rodríguez-Moreno ◽  
Julian Schardt ◽  
...  

BackgroundSingle agent checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are an approved first or second-line therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but their efficacy is limited. Adoptive cell therapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL, LN-145) has demonstrated efficacy in multiple malignancies alone or in combination with CPI. To improve HNSCC therapy, a combination of pembrolizumab and LN-145 was explored.MethodsIOV-COM-202 is an ongoing Phase 2 multicenter, multi-cohort, open-label study evaluating LN-145 in multiple settings and indications, and here we report cohort 2A which enrolled CPI naïve HNSCC patients who received the combination of LN-145 and pembrolizumab. Key eligibility criteria include up to 3 lines of prior therapy, ECOG <1, at least one resectable metastasis for LN-145 production, and at least another measurable lesion after tumor resection. Primary endpoints are ORR per RECIST v1.1 by investigator and safety as measured by the incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). LN-145 production method uses central GMP manufacturing in a 22-day process yielding a cryopreserved TIL product (figure 1). Preconditioning chemotherapy consists of cyclophosphamide/fludarabine, followed by LN-145, and then < 6 doses of IL-2 over <3 days. Pembrolizumab is initiated post-tumor harvest but prior to LN-145 and continues after LN-145 infusion Q3W until toxicity or progression (figure 2).ResultsNine (N=9) HNSCC patients have received LN-145 plus pembrolizumab, with a median duration of follow up of 6.9 months. Nine and 8 patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy, respectively. Mean number of prior therapies was 1.1 with 89% of the patients having received prior chemotherapy. Four were HPV+, 2 HPV-, 3 unknown. The Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) profile was consistent with the underlying advanced disease and the known AE profiles of pembrolizumab, the lymphodepletion and IL-2 regimens. The most common TEAE were chills, hypotension, anemia, thrombocytopenia, pyrexia, fatigue and tachycardia. Four patients had a confirmed, objective response with an ORR of 44% (1 CR, 3 PR, 4 SD, 1 NE) per RECIST 1.1. The disease control rate at data cutoff was 89% in 9 patients, and 7 of the 8 evaluable patients (87.5%) had a reduction in target lesions. Median DOR was not reached.Abstract 353 Figure 1Iovance LN-145 (autologous TIL cell therapy product) ManufacturingAbstract 353 Figure 2IOV-COM-202 Study SchemaConclusionsLN-145 can be safely combined with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic HNSCC. LN-145 plus pembrolizumab shows early signs of improved efficacy particularly when compared with literature reports of pembrolizumab alone in a comparable patient population. Enrollment is ongoing and updated data will be presented.Trial RegistrationNCT03645928Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Advarra Institutional Review Board, under protocol number: Pro00035064.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3235
Author(s):  
Alhadi Almangush ◽  
Ibrahim O. Bello ◽  
Ilkka Heikkinen ◽  
Jaana Hagström ◽  
Caj Haglund ◽  
...  

Although patients with early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) show better survival than those with advanced disease, there is still a number of early-stage cases who will suffer from recurrence, cancer-related mortality and worse overall survival. Incorporation of an immune descriptive factor in the staging system can aid in improving risk assessment of early OTSCC. A total of 290 cases of early-stage OTSCC re-classified according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC 8) staging were included in this study. Scores of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were divided as low or high and incorporated in TNM AJCC 8 to form our proposed TNM-Immune system. Using AJCC 8, there were no significant differences in survival between T1 and T2 tumors (p > 0.05). Our proposed TNM-Immune staging system allowed for significant discrimination in risk between tumors of T1N0M0-Immune vs. T2N0M0-Immune. The latter associated with a worse overall survival with hazard ratio (HR) of 2.87 (95% CI 1.92–4.28; p < 0.001); HR of 2.41 (95% CI 1.26–4.60; p = 0.008) for disease-specific survival; and HR of 1.97 (95% CI 1.13–3.43; p = 0.017) for disease-free survival. The TNM-Immune staging system showed a powerful ability to identify cases with worse survival. The immune response is an important player which can be assessed by evaluating TILs, and it can be implemented in the staging criteria of early OTSCC. TNM-Immune staging forms a step towards a more personalized classification of early OTSCC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document