scholarly journals Spatiotemporal Localization of Periostin and Its Potential Role in Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition during Palatal Fusion

2010 ◽  
Vol 193 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 53-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiko Kitase ◽  
Keisuke Yamashiro ◽  
Katherine Fu ◽  
Joy M. Richman ◽  
Charles F. Shuler
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 3638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Nakajima ◽  
Charles F. Shuler ◽  
Alexander Gulka ◽  
Jun-ichi Hanai

Signaling by transforming growth factor (TGF)-β plays an important role in development, including in palatogenesis. The dynamic morphological process of palatal fusion occurs to achieve separation of the nasal and oral cavities. Critically and specifically important in palatal fusion are the medial edge epithelial (MEE) cells, which are initially present at the palatal midline seam and over the course of the palate fusion process are lost from the seam, due to cell migration, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and/or programed cell death. In order to define the role of TGF-β signaling during this process, several approaches have been utilized, including a small interfering RNA (siRNA) strategy targeting TGF-β receptors in an organ culture context, the use of genetically engineered mice, such as Wnt1-cre/R26R double transgenic mice, and a cell fate tracing through utilization of cell lineage markers. These approaches have permitted investigators to distinguish some specific traits of well-defined cell populations throughout the palatogenic events. In this paper, we summarize the current understanding on the role of TGF-β signaling, and specifically its association with MEE cell fate during palatal fusion. TGF-β is highly regulated both temporally and spatially, with TGF-β3 and Smad2 being the preferentially expressed signaling molecules in the critical cells of the fusion processes. Interestingly, the accessory receptor, TGF-β type 3 receptor, is also critical for palatal fusion, with evidence for its significance provided by Cre-lox systems and siRNA approaches. This suggests the high demand of ligand for this fine-tuned signaling process. We discuss the new insights in the fate of MEE cells in the midline epithelial seam (MES) during the palate fusion process, with a particular focus on the role of TGF-β signaling.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 1057-1064
Author(s):  
Yang Deng ◽  
Kunlin Xie ◽  
Christopher J Logothetis ◽  
Timothy C Thompson ◽  
Jeri Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a pivotal role in the progression of prostate cancer (PCa). However, little is known about genetic variants in the EMT pathway as predictors of aggressiveness, biochemical recurrence (BCR) and disease reclassification in localized PCa. Patients and methods In this multistage study, we evaluated 5186 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 264 genes related to EMT pathway to identify SNPs associated with PCa aggressiveness and BCR in the MD Anderson PCa (MDA-PCa) patient cohort (N = 1762), followed by assessment of the identified SNPs with disease reclassification in the active surveillance (AS) cohort (N = 392). Results In the MDA-PCa cohort, 312 SNPs were associated with high D’Amico risk (P < 0.05), among which, 14 SNPs in 10 genes were linked to BCR risk. In the AS cohort, 2 of 14 identified SNPs (rs76779889 and rs7083961) in C-terminal Binding Proteins 2 gene were associated with reclassification risk. The associations of rs76779889 with different endpoints were: D’Amico high versus low, odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 2.89 (1.32–6.34), P = 0.008; BCR, hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) = 2.88 (1.42–5.85), P = 0.003; and reclassification, HR (95% CI) = 2.83 (1.40–5.74), P = 0.004. For rs7083961, the corresponding risk estimates were: D’Amico high versus low, odds ratio (95% CI) = 1.69 (1.12–2.57), P = 0.013; BCR, HR (95% CI) = 1.87 (1.15–3.02), P = 0.011 and reclassification, HR (95% CI) = 1.72 (1.09–2.72), P = 0.020. There were cumulative effects of these two SNPs on modulating these endpoints. Conclusion Genetic variants in EMT pathway may influence the risks of localized PCa’s aggressiveness, BCR and disease reclassification, suggesting their potential role in the assessment and management of localized PCa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document