scholarly journals Cannabis based medicines and cannabis dependence: A critical review of issues and evidence

2021 ◽  
pp. 026988112098639
Author(s):  
Anne K Schlag ◽  
Chandni Hindocha ◽  
Rayyan Zafar ◽  
David J Nutt ◽  
H Valerie Curran

Cannabis has been legalised for medical use in an ever-increasing number of countries. A growing body of scientific evidence supports the use of medical cannabis for a range of therapeutic indications. In parallel with these developments, concerns have been expressed by many prescribers that increased use will lead to patients developing cannabis use disorder. Cannabis use disorder has been widely studied in recreational users, and these findings have often been projected onto patients using medical cannabis. However, studies exploring medical cannabis dependence are scarce and the appropriate methodology to measure this construct is uncertain. This article provides a narrative review of the current research to discern if, how and to what extent, concerns about problems of dependence in recreational cannabis users apply to prescribed medical users. We focus on the main issues related to medical cannabis and dependence, including the importance of dose, potency, cannabinoid content, pharmacokinetics and route of administration, frequency of use, as well as set and setting. Medical and recreational cannabis use differs in significant ways, highlighting the challenges of extrapolating findings from the recreational cannabis literature. There are many questions about the potential for medical cannabis use to lead to dependence. It is therefore imperative to address these questions in order to be able to minimise harms of medical cannabis use. We draw out seven recommendations for increasing the safety of medical cannabis prescribing. We hope that the present review contributes to answering some of the key questions surrounding medical cannabis dependence.

Cannabis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-59
Author(s):  
Kelly Sagar ◽  
M. Kathryn Dahlgren ◽  
Rosemary Smith ◽  
Ashley Lambros ◽  
Staci Gruber

Background: To date, no studies have directly assessed potential cannabis use disorder (CUD) in medical cannabis (MC) patients pre- vs post-MC treatment. Given that MC patients use cannabis for symptom alleviation rather than intoxication, we hypothesized that MC patients would exhibit few symptoms of CUD after initiating MC treatment. Methods: As part of an ongoing observational, longitudinal study, 54 MC patients completed baseline assessments prior to initiating MC use and returned for at least one follow-up assessment after three, six, and/or twelve months of a self-selected MC treatment regimen; detailed MC treatment information was collected and quantified. All patients completed the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test - Revised (CUDIT-R) at each visit. Changes in individual items scores and total scores were assessed over time, and we examined whether total CUDIT-R scores correlated with frequency of MC use, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) exposure. Further, Cronbach’s alpha analyses were conducted to provide preliminary data regarding the psychometric properties of the CUDIT-R when used among MC patients. Results: Although total CUDIT-R scores increased relative to baseline, on average, ratings fell below the ‘hazardous use’ threshold at each visit. Analyses of individual items revealed that increases in total scores were primarily attributable to increases in frequency of use and not necessarily other aspects of problematic use. Total CUDIT-R scores were not associated with number of MC uses or CBD exposure, but a significant relationship was detected between increased THC exposure and higher CUDIT-R scores. Importantly however, analyses revealed that the CUDIT-R does not appear to be an appropriate tool for identifying CUD in MC patients. Conclusions: Screening tools specifically designed to assess CUD in MC patients are needed and should distinguish between frequent use and problematic use; exposure to individual cannabinoids must also be considered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Kim ◽  
Marilyn E. Coors ◽  
Susan E. Young ◽  
Kristen M. Raymond ◽  
Christian J. Hopfer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Anirban Dutta ◽  
Abhishek Ghosh ◽  
Shubhmohan Singh

Cannabis is the most widely cultivated, trafficked and abused illicit drug (“WHO | Cannabis,” n.d.; “World Drug Report 2020,” n.d.). In 2018, an estimated 192 million people aged 15-64 years used cannabis for nonmedical purposes globally (Degenhardt et al., 2013). The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2016 estimated that, across the globe, there were more than 22·1 million people with cannabis dependence (Degenhardt et al., 2018). Moreover, the same study calculated that cannabis dependence could be accounted for 646 thousand Disability Adjusted Life Years, globally. Importantly, cannabis dependence mostly affects young adults (20-24 years), and thus has significant negative impact on the growth and productivity of not only these individuals but also to the societies and nations (Degenhardt et al., 2013). In addition to the dependence syndrome, cannabis use is associated with increased risk of psychosis, cognitive dysfunction, academic problems, and road side accidents (Volkow et al., 2014). A review showed a fairly consistent associations between cannabis use and both lower educational attainment and increased reported use of other illicit drugs (Macleod et al., 2004). In the United States, Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) is an escalating problem in young adults by legalization (Cerdá et al., 2020) where National Survey on Drug Use and Health reported increased prevalence from 5.1% in 2015 to 5.9% in 2018 in 18-25 year olds (“2019 NSDUH Detailed Tables | CBHSQ Data,” n.d.). The psychoactive effects are due to type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1), the cannabinoid binding protein, that are highly expressed in the cerebellar cortex (Marcaggi, 2015). CB1 is primarily found in the molecular layer at the most abundant synapse type in the cerebellum (Marcaggi, 2015) that can shape the spike activity of cerebellar Purkinje cell (Brown et al., 2019). Moreover, granule cell to Purkinje cell synaptic transmission can trigger endocannabinoid release (Alger and Kim, 2011), which may be important for information processing by cerebellar molecular layer interneurons (Dorgans et al., 2019). This suggests that endocannabinoids could be essential to neurocognitive aspects of cerebellar function (Di Marzo et al., 2015),(Marcaggi, 2015),(Alger and Kim, 2011). Accumulating evidence also suggests cerebellar modulation of the reward circuitry and social behaviour, via direct cerebellar innervation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) including dopamine cell bodies (A1) in the VTA (Carta et al., 2019). The VTA-dopamine (DA) signalling in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (Lohani et al., 2019) play a key role in motivatedbehaviours and cognition. Cerebellar neuropathological changes can result in aberrant dopaminergic activity in the NAc and mPFC (ROGERS et al., 2011),(Lohani et al., 2019). Therefore, there is a critical need to determine how cerebellum modulate limbic VTA-DA signalling. Cerebellar Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) is postulated to be most relevant in CUD since endocannabinoids are essential to cerebellar function that includes reward-related behaviours, information processing, and cognitive control. (Di Marzo et al., 2015),(Marcaggi, 2015),(Alger and Kim, 2011). Furthermore, cerebellar NIBS can facilitate training of cognitive control in CUD during a during visual cue reactivity paradigm using a mobile virtual reality (VR) interface that can also allow remote delivery of cerebellar NIBS in conjunction with VR-based cognitive training for home-based intervention. Specifically, transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be translatable to low-cost (<$150) mobile devices that can be used in a low resource home-based setting (Carvalho et al., 2018).


Author(s):  
Benedikt Fischer ◽  
Angelica Lee ◽  
Tessa Robinson ◽  
Wayne Hall

Abstract Background Canada implemented the legalization and regulation of non-medical cannabis use, production and sale in 2018 aiming to improve public health and safety. While outcomes from legalization reforms in other jurisdictions mostly rely on US-based data have been assessed to be mixed, Canadian data are only emerging. We compiled select population-level data on key indicators to gauge initial developments from pre- to post-legalization of cannabis in Canada. Methods We examined indicators data focusing on the following topics: prevalence of cannabis use, frequency of use, methods/products of consumption, driving after cannabis use, and cannabis sourcing. Indicator data were obtained mostly from national and some provincial population surveys. Prevalence or percentages for the indicators pre- and post-legalization (e.g., 2017- 2020), including confidence intervals were reported, with changes noted, as available in and indicated by the data sources. Results Data suggested selected increases in cannabis use prevalence, mostly among mid- and older- but possibly also younger (e.g., under legal use age) users. Frequency of use and driving after cannabis use among active users do not appear to have changed. Methods of cannabis use show diversifying trends, with decreases in smoking and increases in alternatives use modes (e.g., edibles, vaping). There is a clearly increasing trend towards accessing cannabis from legal sources among adults, while under-legal-use-age youth do not appear to experience heightened barriers to obtaining cannabis in legalization contexts. Conclusions Preliminary indicators on cannabis legalization in Canada show a mixed picture, some similar to US-based developments. While some use increases are observed, these do not necessarily represent indications of increases in cannabis-related harm, also since key (e.g., hospitalization or injury) data are lacking to date. There is a gradual embracing of legal supply sources of cannabis among users, which can be expected to serve public health and safety objectives. At the same time, cannabis use and access among under-age users as a principally vulnerable group do not appear to be hindered or reduced by legalization.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Baumgartner ◽  
Michael Patrick Schaub ◽  
Andreas Wenger ◽  
Doris Malischnig ◽  
Mareike Augsburger ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Despite increasing demand for treatment among cannabis misusers in many countries, most misusers are not in treatment. Internet-based self-help offers an alternative for those hesitant to seek face-to-face therapy, though low-effectiveness and adherence issues often arise. Through adherence-focused guidance enhancement (AFGE), we aimed to increase adherence to, and the effectiveness of Internet-based self-help among cannabis misusers. OBJECTIVE A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing the effectiveness of (1) an AFGE Internet-based self-help intervention with social presence (AFGE-SP), (2) a similar intervention with an impersonal service team (AFGE-ST), and (3) Internet access as usual (IAU, controls). METHODS From July 2016—May 2019, 575 cannabis misusers (70.6% males, mean age=28.3) not otherwise in treatment were recruited from the general population. The primary outcome was cannabis-use days over the preceding 30 days. Secondary outcomes included cannabis-dependence severity, changes in cannabis misuse disorder (CMD) symptoms, and intervention adherence. RESULTS All groups exhibited reduced cannabis-use days after 3 months (AFGE-SP: -8.2; AFGE-ST: -9.8; IAU: -4.2). AFGE-ST participants reported significantly fewer cannabis-use days than IAU controls (P = .01, d = .60); a similar reduction in the AFGE-SP (d=.40) group failed to achieve significance (P =.07). There was no significant difference between the two intervention groups. AFGE-ST patients also exhibited superior improvements in cannabis-use disorder, cannabis-dependence severity, and general anxiety symptoms after three months. CONCLUSIONS Adding an impersonal service team to the AFGE Internet-based self-help intervention significantly reduced cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, dependence severity, and general anxiety symptoms. CLINICALTRIAL http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11086185


Author(s):  
Leslie Iversen

Cannabis research is flourishing despite the difficulties that scientists have in accessing high-quality cannabis. However, many questions remain: Can new medicines be discovered and developed based on the current knowledge of the biosynthesis, actions, and inactivation of endocannabinoids? Can genetic screening identify people who are particularly susceptible to cannabis use disorder and possibly to psychosis? Can researchers pinpoint in more detail how endocannabinoids modulate neural activity and how they change on exposure to stress? Scientific research will tackle all these questions and more in the coming decades. This chapter presents a broad view of the case for medical cannabis, along with some cautions. The case for the legalization of cannabis as a recreational drug is also presented.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Brands ◽  
Patricia Di Ciano ◽  
Robert E. Mann

The road safety impact of cannabis has been a topic of much discussion and debate over the years. These discussions have been revitalized in recent years by initiatives in several jurisdictions to legalize non-medical cannabis. Canada became the second country to legalize non-medical cannabis use in October, 2018, preceded by Uruguay in December 2013. Road safety concerns were key issues in the Canadian government's deliberations on the issue. In this paper, we identify several key questions related to the impact of cannabis on road safety, and provide a consideration of the relevant literature on these questions. These questions cover several perspectives. From an epidemiological perspective, perhaps the central question is whether cannabis use contributes to the chances of being involved in a collision. The answer to this question has evolved in recent years as the ability to conduct the relevant studies has evolved. A related question is the extent to which cannabis plays an important role in road safety, and recent research has made progress in estimating the collisions, injuries, and deaths that may be attributed to cannabis use. Several questions relate to the behavioral and pharmacological effects of cannabis. One central question is whether cannabis affects driving skills in ways that can increase the chances of being involved in a collision. Another important question is whether the effects of the drug on the driving behavior of medical users is similar to, or different from, the effects on non-medical users and whether there are sex differences in the pharmacological and behavioral effects of cannabis. Other important questions are the impact of tolerance to the effects of cannabis on road safety as well as different routes of administration (e.g., edibles, vaped). It remains unclear if there is a dose-response relationship of cannabis to changes in driving. These and other key questions and issues are identified and discussed in this paper.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren R. Pacek ◽  
Sheri L. Towe ◽  
Andrea L. Hobkirk ◽  
Denis Nash ◽  
Renee D. Goodwin

Little is known about cannabis use frequency, medical cannabis use, or correlates of use among persons living with HIV (PLWH) in United States nationally representative samples. Data came from 626 PLWH from the 2005–2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Logistic regression identified characteristics associated with frequency of cannabis use. Chi-squares identified characteristics associated with medial cannabis use. Non-daily and daily cannabis use was reported by 26.9% and 8.0%. Greater perceived risk of cannabis use was negatively associated with daily and non-daily use. Younger age, substance use, and binge drinking were positively associated with non-daily cannabis use. Smoking and depression were associated with non-daily and daily use. One-quarter reported medical cannabis use. Medical users were more likely to be White, married, and nondrinkers. Cannabis use was common among PLWH. Findings help to differentiate between cannabis users based on frequency of use and medical versus recreational use.


Author(s):  
Amol Mehta ◽  
Neha Siddiqui ◽  
Johanna T Fifi ◽  
Reade DeLeacy

Introduction : Recreational and medical cannabis use in the United States has been increasing in recent years in light of state and federal efforts to decriminalize and legalize its use. Its legal status has long precluded extensive research into its adverse effects, especially as it pertains to the realm of vascular and cerebrovascular outcomes. To date, minimal research has been completed on the sequelae of cannabis in inpatient admissions for stroke. Methods : A query of the 2012–2015 Nationwide Inpatient Sample searched for patients admitted with stroke ICD‐9 diagnoses. These patients were then grouped by the presence of concurrent diagnosis of cannabis use disorder, and compared with respect to various peri‐ and postoperative complications, all‐cause mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Propensity score matching was utilized to control for potential baseline confounders. Results : A total of 414,340 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria, 6794 (1.64%) of whom had cannabis use disorder. After controlling for baseline characteristics, these patients had higher rates of inpatient mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.43; p = 0.01263), and non‐routine discharge, as well as increased lengths of stay (6.5 vs 5.7 days, p<0.001) and no significant difference in hospitalization charges ($67507 vs. $ 63328 10, p = 0.3918). Conclusions : Based on a national trends analysis, chronic cannabis use appears to be associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality among patients admitted for stroke diagnoses. Physicians should ensure affected patients be adequately informed of associated risks. Further research should include matching of risk factors not captured in databases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document