scholarly journals Health Economic Burden and Treatment-Based Survival for Current Follicular Lymphoma Treatment Practice in Japan Using a Nationwide Retrospective Claims Database

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2129-2129
Author(s):  
Saaya Tsutsue ◽  
Kensei Tobinai ◽  
Jingbo Yi ◽  
Bruce Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Index Treatment

ABSTRACT Introduction: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), which accounts for 20-30% of all NHL cases. In most patients, FL is diagnosed in advance stages, mild disease progression and long treatment period that may incur a great burden to patients and healthcare system. However, to our knowledge there is no comprehensive analysis which have been done in the real world setting in Japan. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective claim database study to elucidate the lines of treatment patterns as well as the associated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) among 3,593 Japanese patients with a median age of 65.0 years. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) database for patients diagnosed with FL (ICD-10: C82). The MDV database is an electronic health records-based database comprised of anonymized inpatient and outpatient data covering over 25 million patients and over 374 Japanese hospitals, approximately 22% of acute phase hospitals, including 187 cancer therapeutic facilities. Patients who received treatment during the identification period from 1 October 2008 to 31 December 2017 were selected. Patients were required to have data for at least 6 months before the first treatment date (ie, patient index date) and at least 12 months after the index date (unless they died). Costs were converted from Japanese yen to US dollars using the exchange rate based on January of each year of service. For 3- and 5-year OS, patients who had a record of death in their hospital discharge were counted as an event, otherwise they were censored at the latest of: end of patient record, end of data availability, or end of the 3- or 5- year period. Results: A total of 3,593 patients with FL met the inclusion criteria of which 51.2% was female patients. Of these 3,593 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 3,004 patients (83.6%) received rituximab-based (R) therapy as index treatment, of which 1309 (36.4%) of patients received R-CHOP. During the subsequent lines of therapies, patients received heterogeneous treatment regimens (fig 1). Overall, the average healthcare cost during follow-up period was $67,557.40 for all FL patients, ranging from $39,340 (immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or hormone therapy without R) to $ 95,095 (other R-based chemotherapy). The average number of outpatient visits during follow-up for all FL patients was 51, ranging from 44.6 to 55.1 for each treatment group. There were 3,394 (94.5%) patients who had at least one hospitalization during follow up period. Among those who had at least one hospitalization, the average number of hospitalizations was 3.8 for all FL patients, ranging from 2.5 to 4.6 for each treatment group. The average number of days of hospitalization during follow-up was 74.5 for all FL patients, ranging from 31 to 110.4 for each treatment group. 85 (2.4%) FL patients received a stem cell transplant (SCT) during follow-up at the age under 79 years, with other R-based therapies having the highest percentage (7.6%). There were 346 (9.7%) FL patients receiving radiation therapy, ranging from 8.1% (other treatment groups) to 24.1% (immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or hormone therapy without R). There were 337 deaths (9.4%) recorded within 3 years and 400 (11.1%) within 5 years of index treatment. The median Kaplan-Meier OS was not reached for most analysis groups due to the overall high survival rates. When comparing overall survival by index regimen group, chemotherapy without R consistently had worse survival, especially compared to R-based regimens (fig. 2). Conclusions: Patients with FL in Japan received diverse treatment regimens and multiple lines of therapy with relatively high survival rates. Majority of patients have received R-based therapies and have shown longer survival rates compared to those who have received chemotherapy without R. This is the first study to clarify lines of treatment patterns using retrospective claims database and treatment group-based OS in FL patients in Japan, which will give clinical insights of the landscape of daily practices and the associated real world health economic burden for patients, clinicians and healthcare providers to support their better decision makings. Disclosures Tsutsue: Celgene: Employment. Tobinai:Solasia: Honoraria; Mundi Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Yakult: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; Meiji Seika: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; HUYA Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Zenyaku Kogyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Research Funding. Yi:Celgene: Consultancy. Crawford:Celgene: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Real-World Treatment Patterns Among a Contemporary Cohort of Commercially Insured Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients in the United States

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4845-4845
Author(s):  
Lindsey E. Roeker ◽  
Shaum Kabadi ◽  
Chakkarin Burudpakdee ◽  
Aimee Near ◽  
Keiko Wada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Oral Medications ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Insured Patients

Abstract Introduction Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma associated with a poor prognosis. The approval of ibrutinib in November 2013 has changed the treatment paradigm for patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. There remains a lack of information on the current treatment patterns used in clinical practice in a contemporary cohort of commercially insured patients. We aimed to identify the treatment patterns for MCL overall and by line of therapy (LOT) and to describe patient demographics and clinical characteristics in a large cohort of commercially insured MCL patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted with the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims-US database. Adult patients (≥18 years old) with ≥1 claim for a NCCN-recommended MCL treatment between November 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 were identified. Index date was the first treatment claim. Patients were also required to have ≥1 diagnosis of MCL during the study period (November 1, 2012 to January 31, 2018), ≥12 months of continuous enrollment prior to index date (pre-index period) and ≥30 days after index date (follow-up period). Patients were excluded if they were ≥65 years at index and not enrolled in Medicare Risk or Medicare Cost, enrolled in a clinical trial during the study period, had evidence of MCL treatment in the pre-index period (except for patients indexed on ibrutinib as it is indicated for MCL patients with ≥1 prior treatment), or had evidence of stem cell transplant (SCT) before index date. The most commonly observed MCL treatment regimens were identified, and demographic and clinical characteristics of patients and treatment durations by regimen were described. Treatment regimen was defined as the combination of all agents observed in the 35-day period after the first MCL treatment claim; treatment duration was defined as the start of treatment until a gap of ≥90 days between end date and next date of treatment or treatment modification. Treatment end date occurred 90 days after the end of the supply for oral medications or 30 days after the last administration for non-oral medications. Results There were 1,785 patients treated with the most commonly observed MCL treatment regimens. The most common regimens, irrespective of LOT, were rituximab monotherapy (including maintenance therapy; n=773, 43.3%), R-CHOP (n=723, 40.5%), B-R (n=436, 24.4%), and ibrutinib monotherapy (n=199, 11.1%). Overall, patients had a median (IQR) age of 57 (52-62) years, and 59.4% were male. Most patients were commercially or self- insured (57.5% and 33.6%, respectively). Patients had a median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 0 (IQR 0-1; mean [SD] 0.9 [1.4]), with the most common CCI components being diabetes (15.7%), chronic pulmonary disease (12.8%), and congestive heart failure (9.5%). During the follow-up period (median [IQR] 22.5 [10.5-35.3] months), in addition to the MCL regimen(s), patients received radiation therapy (17.4%), SCT (10.0%), and/or immunotherapy (0.2%). The use of targeted therapies (i.e. lenalidomide, bortezomib) other than ibrutinib was infrequent. When considering treatment lines, R-CHOP was the most commonly observed first regimen, followed by rituximab, B-R, and ibrutinib; for the second and third observed regimens, rituximab was the most common, followed by ibrutinib (Figure 1). The median (IQR) duration for the first observed regimen was 8.1 (3.9-18.0) months for ibrutinib, 5.0 (3.3-5.6) months for B-R, 4.0 (2.5-4.4) months for R-CHOP, and 1.9 (1.7-4.4) months for rituximab; ibrutinib also had the longest duration in the second and third line (median [IQR] 5.5 [2.4-13.5] months and 8.3 [3.9-12.4] months, respectively). Conclusion This is the largest study of MCL patients describing treatment patterns in current clinical practice among commercially insured patients. MCL patients were most commonly treated with chemoimmunotherapy for all treatment lines while ibrutinib was the second most common LOT2 and LOT3 regimen. As the treatment landscape and clinical practice continues to change with the use of novel agents, future studies are warranted to further study toxicities and outcomes in the real-world setting. Disclosures Kabadi: AstraZeneca: Employment. Burudpakdee:IQVIA received funds from AstraZeneca to conduct the analysis, interpret data, and coauthor the publication.: Consultancy. Near:IQVIA received funds from AstraZeneca to conduct the analysis, interpret data, and coauthor the publication.: Consultancy. Wada:IQVIA received funds from AstraZeneca to conduct the analysis, interpret data, and coauthor the publication.: Consultancy. Mato:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Prime Oncology: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy.

Shifting Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Veterans Diagnosed with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia from 2006 to 2018

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
Hsu-Chih Chien ◽  
Deborah Kay Morreall ◽  
Vikas Patil ◽  
Kelli M Rasmussen ◽  
Christina Yong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Treatment Regimens

Background Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare indolent lymphoma with an estimated 1,500 new cases diagnosed each year in the United States (US). Over the last decade, several treatments have been introduced into the WM therapeutics landscape including, bendamustine, bortezomib, and most recently oral Bruton's kinase inhibitor (ibrutinib). There is limited information in the adoption of these WM treatments in real-world clinical settings in the US. We describe the practice patterns and clinical outcomes of first-line (1L) treatment of WM in a nationwide cohort of Veterans. Methods Using Veteran Affairs electronic health records (EHR) data, we identified Veterans who were diagnosed and received 1L treatment for WM between January 2006 and December 2018 in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Human annotation of EHR clinical records confirmed the diagnosis and 1L treatment regimens. Patients with another cancer diagnosis or patients with documentation that 1L treatment was received outside the VHA were excluded. Eligible patients were followed until loss to follow-up, death, or the end of the study period (June 30, 2019). Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment patterns were identified. Local polynomial regression model curves were generated to demonstrate treatment changes over time. Unadjusted progression-free survival (PFS) and the unadjusted overall survival (OS) are also provided. Results We identified 505 patients diagnosed with WM in VHA between January 2006 thru December 2018. Of these, 318 patients received 1L treatment, with a median time from diagnosis to 1L treatment of 1.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-5 months). The median age of WM patients was 69.9 years (standard deviation [SD]: 9.4 years), with approximately 73% of WM patients ≥65 years old. Prior to 1L treatment, the median hemoglobin and platelets observed were similar across all treatment groups, regardless of first 1L treatment. However, the median immunoglobulin M (IgM) was substantially lower in patient's treated with ibrutinib (2,570 mg/dL [range: 422-9,001 mg/dL]) and single-agent rituximab (R), 2,855 mg/dL (range: 84-7,880 mg/dL) when compared to those treated with chlorambucil +/- rituximab (4,416 mg/dL [range: (9-8,130 mg/dL]) and bortezomib/dexamethasone +/- rituximab (BDR), 4,086 mg/dL (range: 16-9,944 mg/dL). MYD88 testing occurred in 40 (13%) of patients, with testing most frequently occurring in patients treated with bendamustine +/- rituximab (BR), ibrutinib, and BDR- likely reflecting increased adoption in later periods. Hepatitis C testing occurred in 61 (19%) of patients, with testing most frequently occurring in patients treated with dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide (DRC), BDR, and BR. Over the study observation period, 1L practice patterns shift significantly with increased adoption of BR, BDR and ibrutinib and de-adoption of chemotherapy (Figure 1). The median follow-up time for all patients was 44 months (range: 1-147 months), although a shorter median follow-up time was observed in patients treated with therapeutics in recent years, such as ibrutinib (18 months [range: 2-53 months]) and BR (23 months [range: 4-86 months]). The median unadjusted PFS for all WM patients was 44 months (95% CI: 37-58 months) and the median unadjusted overall survival (OS) was 94 months (95% CI: 82-117 months). Conclusions The introduction of numerous therapeutic options throughout the past decade has profoundly altered the treatment landscape for WM, suggesting a shift in 1L practices from chlorambucil to BDR, BR, and most recently ibrutinib which has been increasingly adopted, since its approval in 2015, especially in older patients, suggesting that it may provide an effective therapeutic option for patients who may not be able to tolerate more aggressive treatment regimens. Limitations of this study include the differences observed in follow-up time as well as the limited number of patients in some 1L treatment groups. Further research is required to establish the long-term benefits and potential treatment-related toxicities of WM treatments in real-world clinical settings. Disclosures Sauer: Roche: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Halwani:AbbVie: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Immunedesign: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Comparison of Survival Rates, Healthcare Resource Use and Costs of Elderly Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Dasatinib or Nilotinib As Second-Line Therapy

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2618-2618
Author(s):  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Dominick Latremouille-Viau ◽  
Zhou Zhou ◽  
Annie Guerin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Harvard University ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Analysis Group ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Dasatinib and nilotinib are two second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that are well established as treatment options for patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase resistant or intolerant to imatinib and the treatment guidelines do not differentiate based on patient age. Importantly, elderly patients (≥65 years old) account for about half of CML patients; yet there are little data reported focusing on outcomes in this distinct group of patients, often with multiple medical problems and different socio-economic profiles when compared to younger patients. This study aimed to compare survival rates, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and medical service costs between elderly CML patients receiving dasatinib versus nilotinib as second-line therapy after imatinib. Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with ≥2 CML diagnoses who received imatinib as first-line therapy followed by nilotinib or dasatinib as second-line therapy were identified using the Medicare Research Identifiable Files (RIF) from 2006 to 2012. Selected patients were continuously enrolled in the Part A (i.e., institutional claims), Part B (i.e., non-institutional claims), and Part D (i.e., drug events) for ≥6 months before and ≥1 month after the second-line TKI therapy initiation date (i.e., index date). Patients enrolled in a clinical trial, those with a stem-cell transplant, or receiving chemotherapy (except hydroxyurea) during the 6 months before the index date (i.e., baseline period) were excluded from the study. Based on the second-line TKI, patients were classified as nilotinib users or dasatinib users. Survival rates were estimated using Kaplan Meir analyses and compared between nilotinib and dasatinib users using Cox proportional-hazards models. HRU and healthcare costs (USD 2013; payer’s perspective) were observed from the index date up to the end of follow-up. Because the length of follow-up varied across patients, HRU and costs were reported per-patient-per-month (PPPM). Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated using Poisson regression models and monthly cost differences were estimated using general linear models with a log link and a gamma distribution or two-part models. Multivariate regression analyses were used to adjust for potential confounding factors measured during the baseline period or at the index date. Results: After applying the sample selection criteria, 659 patients using a second-line TKI therapy were selected; 280 were nilotinib users and 379 were dasatinib users. On average, patients had a follow-up of 24 months (median=22 months) after the index date. The mean age was 76 years and most patients were female (62%). Nilotinib and dasatinib users were generally similar in terms of gender, region of residence, prior imatinib treatment duration, CML complexity, and comorbidity profile. However, nilotinib users were slightly older than dasatinib users; a greater proportion of nilotinib users were 80+ years old at the index date (35% of nilotinib users vs. 27% of dasatinib users; p=.039). In addition, the proportion of patients with cardiovascular disease (40% of nilotinib users vs. 31% of dasatinib users; p=0.015) or congestive heart failure (23% of nilotinib users vs. 14% of dasatinib users; p=0.002) during the baseline period was higher in nilotinib users when compared to dasatinib users. Despite these differences, the median survival time was >4.9 years for nilotinib users and 4.0 years for dasatinib users (log rank test p=.032). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, nilotinib users had a mortality risk that was 38% lower than that of dasatinib users (p=.006) and, nilotinib users had 21% fewer inpatient admissions, 17% fewer inpatient days, 31% fewer emergency room visits, and 12% fewer outpatient visits when compared to dasatinib users (PPPM; all p≤.001). The adjusted monthly medical cost was $378 lower in nilotinib users when compared to dasatinib users (PPPM; p=.045). Conclusion: This retrospective study of elderly Medicare beneficiaries with CML receiving second-line therapy with dasatinib or nilotinib suggested that those receiving nilotinib had longer survival, lower HRU, and lower medical costs than those receiving dasatinib. Further health outcome researches and longer term studies focusing on elderly CML are needed to better define the best practice patterns. Disclosures Liu: Jun Liu is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Latremouille-Viau:Dominick Latremouille-Viau is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Zhou:Zhou Zhou is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Guerin:Annie Guerin is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Fernandez:Daniel Fernandez is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Yi:Dingdong Yi is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Wang:Xufei Wang is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Wu:Eric Q. Wu is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Mhatre:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Keir:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Novartis: stock options Other; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment.

scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Who Received Third Line Therapy at the Christie NHS Foundation Trust in the UK

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5011-5011
Author(s):  
Kim Linton ◽  
Cristina Julian ◽  
Adam Gibb ◽  
Ellie White ◽  
Emma-Frances Armstrong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Background: There are limited data on real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for follicular lymphoma (FL) in the relapsed/refractory (r/r) setting, with shorter response durations reported after each relapse (Link et al, 2019; Rivas-Delgado et al, 2019 and Batlevi et al, 2020). We examined treatment patterns for patients with FL initiating third line (3L) therapy at a single institution by time period in the post-rituximab era (2004-2010 and 2011-2020), and clinical outcomes for the overall cohort receiving therapy between 2004 and 2020. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational study of patients with FL who initiated 3L therapy between 2004 and 2020 in routine clinical practice at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK. We selected patients aged ≥18 years at 3L initiation, with histologically documented FL Grade 1−3a treated with two prior lines of systemic therapy including an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an alkylating agent, and at least one year of follow-up after initiating 3L therapy; follow-up ended June 2021. We excluded patients with grade 3b FL or transformation to high grade lymphoma any time before 3L treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) to 3L therapy was calculated, and overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method with 3L therapy initiation date as the index date. Results: Overall, 41 patients met all eligibility criteria; 11 and 30 patients received 3L therapy between 2004-2010 and 2011-2020, respectively. Median age at index date was 59 years and 53.7% were male; 73.2% had grade 1 or 2 FL; 78.1% had advanced stage (III/IV) FL at diagnosis. Median follow-up was 33.9 (IQR: 14.5, 63.0) months, and median time from diagnosis to 3L treatment was 60.2 (IQR: 29.4, 89.1) months. The most common regimen in 3L was rituximab plus bendamustine (R-benda) followed by rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and rituximab used as a single agent (R-mono). Treatment patterns differed by time period (Table 1). R-benda was more commonly used between 2011 and 2020. The most common sequence was rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) followed by R-CHOP and R-benda (Figure 1). ORR to 3L treatment was 61.0%, CR 29.3%. Median OS, PFS and TTNT with 95% confidence interval (CI) were 70.0 (30.2-NR), 19.2 (9.5-34.7) and 11.8 (9.0-27.6) months after 3L initiation, respectively. Two- and five-year OS rates were 79% and 50%, and two-year PFS rate was 37%. Conclusions: Patients with r/r FL treated in the routine 3L setting have highly variable treatment patterns and unfavorable outcomes, representing a continued unmet medical need. This study is limited by its small size and evolving treatments, warranting a larger study of more recently treated 3L patients to evaluate the impact of modern treatment pathways and novel therapies on clinical outcomes for r/r FL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Linton: University of Manchester: Current Employment; BeiGene: Research Funding; Hartley Taylor: Honoraria; Genmab: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Julian: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Gibb: The Christie NHS Foundation Trust: Current Employment; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Li: Genesis Research: Current Employment. Liu: Genesis Research: Current Employment. Shewade: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Radford: BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.

scholarly journals Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the United States: An Electronic Medical Record (EMR)-Based Analysis

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Amanda Wilson ◽  
Ahmed Daak ◽  
Jun Su
Keyword(s):  
Index Date ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
The United States ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Chronic Itp ◽  
Pain Medications

Introduction ITP is an autoimmune disorder characterized by platelet destruction and impaired production. Some patients with ITP are refractory or unresponsive to existing therapies, indicating significant unmet medical needs. An assessment of current real-world treatment patterns among patients with ITP should enhance understanding of the ITP disease population and current unmet need. Here we present real-world data describing the ITP population in the United States in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics and use of available ITP therapies. Methods This was a longitudinal, retrospective, observational cohort study utilizing data from the Optum® Clinformatics® claims database. Patients with newly diagnosed ITP were included; defined as patients with ≥1 inpatient claim or ≥2 outpatient claims within 90 days of ITP-related diagnosis codes (International Classification of Diseases [ICD], Ninth and Tenth Revision; ICD-9: 287.3x; ICD-10: D69.3x or D69.4x) between October 1, 2015 and March 31, 2020. The index date was the date these criteria were met. Patients were excluded if they had <12 months continuous coverage or any record of thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) use before the index date. All patients were required to have ≥1 prescription during follow-up. Primary ITP was defined as patients who met the inclusion criteria and also had no ICD codes for secondary ITP, and no causes of secondary ITP in an identified time period prior to the index date. Here we describe clinical characteristics and medication use among newly diagnosed patients with primary ITP and the proportion of patients who went on to develop persistent (90 days to <12 months) or chronic (≥12 months) ITP. Results There were 19,376 newly diagnosed patients who met inclusion criteria; 15,798 (82%) had primary ITP and 3,578 (18%) had secondary ITP. Among patients with primary ITP, median (min-max) duration of follow-up was 16 (0-55) months and 61% had ≥12 months of follow-up (median duration: 26 months). At baseline, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 67 (16) years and 53% of patients were male. Mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 0.94 (1.41) and 11% of patients fell into a CCI category ≥3. The most common comorbid conditions were hypertension (60%), cardiovascular disease (37%), diabetes (29%), and anemia (27%). The most commonly used concomitant medications were lipid-lowering medications (44%), pain medications (24%), corticosteroids (23%), and anticoagulants (11%). During follow-up, use of these medications increased (lipid-lowering medications [46%], pain medications [38%], corticosteroids [39%], and anticoagulants [15%]). The most commonly used ITP medications during follow-up were corticosteroids (33%), rituximab (3.3%), TPO-RA (2.8%), immunosuppressants (2.6%), intravenous immunoglobulin (2.5%), and immunomodulators (2.4%). There were 1935 (12%) deaths during follow-up, and 87 (0.6%) patients underwent a splenectomy. Of the patients with ≥12 months of follow-up (n=9610), 16% and 32% developed persistent ITP and chronic ITP, respectively. Among the patients with persistent/chronic ITP and ≥12 months of follow-up, 242 (5.3%) received TPO-RA during follow-up. Of these, 93% concomitantly received ≥1 additional ITP treatment-related medication (TRM), 73% of the patients who received TPO-RA and ≥1 other TRM received ≥2 additional ITP TRMs, and 68% of patients who received TPO-RA and ≥2 other TRMs received ≥3 additional ITP TRMs. Of the 242 patients with ≥12 months of follow-up and persistent/chronic ITP who received TPO-RA, 55 (23%) either received an additional TPO-RA therapy or received another newly initiated ITP-related medication ≥30 days after starting TPO-RA. Almost half of the patients with primary ITP developed persistent/chronic disease. However, only a small percentage of these patients in the Optum® Clinformatics® claims database with no history of TPO-RA use received TPO-RA during follow-up. The majority of patients treated with TPO-RA received ≥1 other ITP TRM during follow-up and nearly 1 in 4 persistent/chronic patients receiving TPO-RA required ≥1 additional TPO-RA or switched to another ITP medication. Conclusion Even with the availability of many ITP drug therapies, there is still a considerable current unmet need for effective treatments among patients with primary ITP. The authors acknowledge Rajeshwari Punekar for contributions to study design. Disclosures Wilson: Sanofi: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Daak:Sanofi: Current Employment. Su:Sanofi: Current Employment.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Patterns in Elderly Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Dasatinib or Nilotinib As Second-Line Therapy after Imatinib

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1293-1293
Author(s):  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Dominick Latremouille-Viau ◽  
Zhou Zhou ◽  
Annie Guerin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Harvard University ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Analysis Group ◽  
Percentage Points

Abstract Introduction: Dasatinib and nilotinib are second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) originally approved as second-line treatment for patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Despite the fact that one half of patients with CML are ≥65 years of age, elderly patients are often under-recruited in clinical trials and there are few studies that focus on these often medically complex patients. This study aimed to compare treatment patterns of elderly CML patients initiating dasatinib vs nilotinib as second-line TKI therapy after imatinib therapy in a real-world setting. Methods: Elderly Medicare beneficiaries (≥65 years old) with ≥2 CML diagnoses who initiated dasatinib or nilotinib following prior treatment with imatinib were identified in the Medicare Research Identifiable Files (RIF) from 2006 to 2012. Selected patients were continuously covered by Part A (i.e., institutional claims), Part B (i.e., non-institutional claims), and Part D (i.e., drug events) for ≥6 months before and ≥1 month after the second-line TKI therapy initiation date (i.e., index date). Patients were excluded from the study if they were enrolled in a clinical trial, had a stem-cell transplant, or received chemotherapy (except hydroxyurea) within the 6 months before the index date (i.e., baseline period). Patients were classified as dasatinib users or nilotinib users based on the second-line TKI therapy. Dose decreases and increases, defined as a dose change of ≥20mg for dasatinib and ≥100mg for nilotinib compared to the initial dose, were measured from the index date up to the end of follow-up or treatment discontinuation. Treatment adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) during the 6- and 12-month periods following the index date and among patients with continuous insurance coverage during these periods. Treatment persistence, measured between the index date and the end of follow-up, included time to treatment discontinuation (i.e., a treatment gap of ≥30 consecutive days) or switch to another TKI. Multivariate regression analyses were used to test for statistical significance while adjusting for potential confounding factors. Results: Of the 659 patients that met the sample selection criteria, 379 were dasatinib users and 280 were nilotinib users. The average age was 76 years (inter-quartile range 70 – 81) and 62% were female. After the index date, 88% of selected patients were observed for ≥6 months and 73% for ≥12 months. The average patient follow-up was 24 months (median=22 months). Dasatinib users were more likely to start on the recommended dose compared to nilotinib users (74% vs 53%; p<.001); only 15% of dasatinib users started on a dose ≤70mg/day and 10% started on 140mg/day; also 18% of nilotinib users started on ≤400mg/day and 24% started on 600mg/day. Dose reductions were almost twice as common in dasatinib users (21% vs 11%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.94; p=.002) and dose increases were also more common in dasatinib users (9% vs 7%; adjusted HR=1.81; p=.048) compared with nilotinib users. During the 6- and 12-month periods following the index date, dasatinib and nilotinib users had similar adherence level (6-month period: average PDC=78% for dasatinib vs 76% for nilotinib, adjusted mean difference=1.19 percentage points, p=.520; 12-month period: average PDC=69% for dasatinib vs 70% for nilotinib, adjusted mean difference=-1.37 percentage points, p=.570). Nilotinib users were more persistent compared to dasatinib users as fewer patients discontinued (59% vs 67%; adjusted HR=0.79; p=.024) or switched to another TKI treatment (21% vs 29%; adjusted HR=0.72; p=.049). Conclusion: There are little data available on treatment patterns of elderly CML patients. This study suggests that it is hard to determine the right starting dose of drug in elderly patients receiving a second generation TKI following treatment with imatinib. Interestingly, those receiving nilotinib had fewer dose adjustments (decreases or increases) and were more persistent (fewer discontinuation and switching) compared to those receiving dasatinib despite having similar levels of adherence over the first 6- and 12-month periods following the treatment initiation. Studies which focus on patients with elderly CML may help to provide better treatment guidelines for this important population. Disclosures Liu: Jun Liu is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Latremouille-Viau:Dominick Latremouille-Viau is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Zhou:Zhou Zhou is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Guerin:Annie Guerin is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Fernandez:Daniel Fernandez is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Yi:Dingdong Yi is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Wang:Xufei Wang is an employee of Harvard University which has received research funding from Analysis Group, Inc.: Employment. Wu:Eric Q. Wu is an employee of Analysis Group, Inc. which has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Mhatre:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Keir:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment; Novartis: stock options Other.

scholarly journals Real World Treatment Outcomes and Cost Among Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Combination with Cyclophosphamide or Lenalidomide

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5924-5924
Author(s):  
Lin Xie ◽  
Kejal Parikh ◽  
Safiya Abouzaid ◽  
Shivani Pandya ◽  
Onur Baser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background: Despite an increasing incidence of multiple myeloma (MM) with advancing age and life expectancy, there are few real-world claims-based analyses describing treatment patterns and healthcare costs associated with use of novel treatments.1,2 This study aimed to assess treatment patterns and healthcare costs among newly-diagnosed MM patients using the US Medicare database. Methods: This retrospective study identified adult patients with ≥2 claims for MM (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification code: 203.0x) 30 days apart and ≥1 treatment during the identification period (01JAN2011-30JUN2014) from the 100% Medicare dataset. Medicare dataset contains medical and pharmacy claims submitted by healthcare providers, facilities and pharmacy. It includes comprehensive demographic information for beneficiaries and a longitudinal picture of their healthcare utilizations and costs .The initial course of therapy (COT1) date was the index date and included all treatments prescribed within 60 days of this date. Patients were required to have continuous enrollment for 12 months pre- and ≥6 months post-index date unless the patient died in <6 months (follow-up period), ≥1 full cycle of therapy with a valid COT1 regimen, no evidence of prior MM diagnosis or treatment (including autologous stem cell transplant [ASCT]), and no evidence of ASCT in the follow-up period. COT2 was defined as the earliest occurrence of: addition of a new drug or switch in regimen after the first 60 days, restart of a previous regimen after >180-day gap, or dose increase from maintenance to relapse therapy. Steroids (dexamethasone/prednisone [d]) were assumed to be included regardless of whether or not they were observed during the study period; this did not impact the ongoing COT. Treatment patterns and healthcare costs during the follow-up period were compared among those initiating lenalidomide (R) with bortezomib (V) ± steroids (RVd) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) with bortezomib (bor) ± steroids (CyBorD). Time-to-next treatment (TTNT) was defined as the duration from initiation of COT1 plus any treatment gaps until the initiation of COT2. Kaplan Meier (KM), Cox regression analyses and a generalized linear model (GLM) were performed to evaluate TTNT, assess the impact of various predictors on TTNT, and estimate the 12-month per patient per month (PPPM) total healthcare costs respectively among patients initiating RVd and CyBorD. Results:After accounting for the patient selection criteria, 9.9% (n=345) of patients initiated RVd and 5.0% (n=175) initiated CyBorD as COT1. CyBorD-treated patients were significantly older (76.1 vs. 74.2 years, p=0.0009) with a higher age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score (9.5 vs 8.8, p=0.0119). The overall mean duration of COT1 was significantly longer among patients treated with RVd vs CyBorD (13.2 vs 8.5 months, p<0.0001). Among patients who completed COT1, the mean duration of COT1 was longer for patients treated with RVd vs. CyBorD (12.8 vs 6.7 months, p<0.0001). A higher percentage of patients treated with CyBorD progressed to COT2 (27.4%, vs 21.7% p=0.1491) versus RVd, however no significant difference was observed. Among patients who progressed to COT2, TTNT was significantly shorter among those treated with CyBorD vs RVd (Mean: 7.9 vs 15.9 months, p<0.0001). KM analysis suggested that patients initiating CyBorD progressed much faster than patients receiving RVd. After adjusting for baseline characteristics using Cox regression, TTNT remained significantly shorter for CyBorD vs. RVd treated patients (hazard ratio: 2.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.4, p=0.0002). Results from GLM analysis suggested that adjusted total PPPM cost during 12 months follow up was higher among patients treated with RVd vs. CyBorD ($13,941 vs $9,340, p=0.0001), and the majority of the extra cost are due to higher pharmacy costs for patients treated with RVd. Conclusion: Patients on RVd incurred higher costs, however, they progressed significantly slower and their TTNT was almost twice as long as for CyBorD patients. The difference remained significant after controlling for baseline characteristics including markers for higher disease severity among patients on CyBorD. 1Song X, et al. Curr Med Res Opin 2015;32(1):95-103 2Teitelbaum A, et al. Oncologist 2013;18:37-45 Disclosures Xie: Celgene: Research Funding. Parikh:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Abouzaid:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Pandya:Celgene: Research Funding. Baser:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Patel:Celgene: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Cognitive decline in patients with prostate cancer: study protocol of a prospective cohort, NEON-PC

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e043844
Author(s):  
Natalia Araujo ◽  
Samantha Morais ◽  
Ana Rute Costa ◽  
Raquel Braga ◽  
Ana Filipa Carneiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Cognitive Performance ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Cardiovascular Complications ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
High Survival ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionProstate cancer is the most prevalent oncological disease among men in industrialised countries. Despite the high survival rates, treatments are often associated with adverse effects, including metabolic and cardiovascular complications, sexual dysfunction and, to a lesser extent, cognitive decline. This study was primarily designed to evaluate the trajectories of cognitive performance in patients with prostate cancer, and to quantify the impact of the disease and its treatments on the occurrence of cognitive decline.MethodsParticipants will be recruited from two main hospitals providing care to approximately half of the patients with prostate cancer in Northern Portugal (Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto and São João Hospital Centre), and will comprise a cohort of recently diagnosed patients with prostate cancer proposed for different treatment plans, including: (1) radical prostatectomy; (2) brachytherapy and/or radiotherapy; (3) radiotherapy in combination with androgen deprivation therapy and (4) androgen deprivation therapy (with or without chemotherapy). Recruitment began in February 2018 and is expected to continue until the first semester of 2021. Follow-up evaluations will be conducted at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years. Sociodemographic, behavioural and clinical characteristics, anxiety and depression, health literacy, health status, quality of life, and sleep quality will be assessed. Blood pressure and anthropometrics will be measured, and a fasting blood sample will be collected. Participants’ cognitive performance will be evaluated before treatments and throughout follow-up (Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Cube Test as well as Brain on Track for remote monitoring). All participants suspected of cognitive impairment will undergo neuropsychological tests and clinical observation by a neurologist.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospitals involved. All participants will provide written informed consent, and study procedures will be developed to ensure data protection and confidentiality. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation in scientific meetings.

scholarly journals Survival Rate of 1008 Short Dental Implants with 21 Months of Average Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3943
Author(s):  
João Caramês ◽  
Ana Catarina Pinto ◽  
Gonçalo Caramês ◽  
Helena Francisco ◽  
Joana Fialho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Clinical Records

This retrospective study evaluated the survival rate of short, sandblasted acid-etched surfaced implants with 6 and 8 mm lengths with at least 120 days of follow-up. Data concerning patient, implant and surgery characteristics were retrieved from clinical records. Sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA)-surfaced tissue-level 6 mm (TL6) or 8 mm (TL8) implants or bone-level tapered 8 mm (BLT8) implants were used. Absolute and relative frequency distributions were calculated for qualitative variables and mean values and standard deviations for quantitative variables. A Cox regression model was performed to verify whether type, length and/or width influence the implant survival. The cumulative implant survival rate was assessed by time-to-event analyses (Kaplan–Meier estimator). In all, 513 patients with a mean age of 58.00 ± 12.44 years received 1008 dental implants with a mean follow-up of 21.57 ± 10.77 months. Most implants (78.17%) presented a 4.1 mm diameter, and the most frequent indication was a partially edentulous arch (44.15%). The most frequent locations were the posterior mandible (53.97%) and the posterior maxilla (31.55%). No significant differences were found in survival rates between groups of type, length and width of implant with the cumulative rate being 97.7% ± 0.5%. Within the limitations of this study, the evaluated short implants are a predictable option with high survival rates during the follow-up without statistical differences between the appraised types, lengths and widths.

scholarly journals Cardiac Morbidity in Adolescents and Young Adult Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
Kristin C. Marr ◽  
Jonathan Simkin ◽  
Andrea C. Lo ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Alina S. Gerrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Matched Case ◽  
Cv Disease ◽  
Relapsed Disease

INTRODUCTION Adolescents and young adult (AYA) survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are potentially at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease due to anthracycline exposure, in addition to use of mediastinal radiotherapy (RT). Although the risk has been well described in the pediatric age-group, the impact in the AYA population has been less well characterized. Capturing the incidence of these late effects is challenging given that events can occur more than a decade after therapy completion. Using population-based administrative data, we evaluated the incidence of CV disease (combined heart failure (HF) and ischemic heart disease (IHD)) in a cohort of AYA survivors treated for classical HL (cHL) using ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) or equivalent chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with cHL aged 16-39 years (y), diagnosed between 1992-2013 and treated with an ABVD or equivalent therapy, were identified in the BC Cancer Lymphoid Cancer Database. Patients must have survived to an Index Date defined as 2 y from most recent HL event (primary diagnosis or if applicable, most recent relapse) and have had a minimum follow-up of 1 y beyond their Index Date. Patients were excluded if they had history of prior malignancy or HIV positivity. Limited stage disease was defined as stage IA, IB or IIA and absence of bulky disease (≥10cm); all others had advanced stage disease. Cases were linked with population-based databases of BC Cancer Registry; BC Radiation Oncology Database; and BC Ministry of Health (MOH) Chronic Disease Registry (CDR) that captures all BC residents registered with medical service plan coverage during the study period. The outcome variables, including HF and IHD, were defined by the BC MOH CDR using Standardized Case Definitions. To focus on late onset CV complications, only events that occurred after the Index Date were included in the analysis. A 10:1 individually-matched control population was identified from the CDR based on age, sex, and health authority region on the Index Date of the matched case. Controls were excluded if they had a pre-existing malignancy, HF, or IHD prior to the study window. Individual outcomes were collected from the Index Date of the matched case until December 31, 2015 or until an individual was censored due to loss to follow-up or death. Kaplan Meier (K-M) methodology and log-rank test was used to estimate cumulative incidence. A competing risk regression analysis was used to evaluate relative risk (RR) and p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 11 y (range 3-24 y) from most recent HL event, 764 AYA 2-y survivors were identified, aged 20 to 61 y (median 38 y) at the end of study period. The proportion of limited and advanced stage disease was 34.2% and 65.6%, respectively; and 49.9% were male. Eighty-eight patients (11.5%) had relapsed disease; eighty-six (11.3%) underwent high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation as part of their salvage therapy. In total, 268 patients (36.4%) were treated with mediastinal RT for primary therapy or for relapsed disease. Fifty-three percent received cumulative anthracycline dose ≥300 mg/m2. Survivors had a 3-fold increased risk of CV disease relative to controls (p&lt;0.0001). The onset of CV disease in survivors occurred at median of 11.7 y after most recent treatment (range 2.2-19.2 y), and at a median age of 44.3 y (range 21 - 58 y). At 15 y, the estimated cumulative incidence of CV disease was 6.3% in survivors compared to 2.3% in controls (Figure A). In the 496 survivors that received chemotherapy only, the incidence of CV disease at 15 y was 4.6% vs 2.3% in controls, and those that received anthracyclines and mediastinal RT had significantly higher incidence at 8.6% (Figure B). The increase in risk was greatest for a diagnosis of HF (RR 6.92, p&lt;0.0001): at 15 y, the cumulative incidence of HF was 2.2% vs 0.6% in controls. The RR of IHD was 2.63 (p&lt;0.0001) with incidence of 5.1% in cases compared to 1.8% in controls. CONCLUSION Similar to the pediatric population, AYA cHL survivors are at increased risk of both HF and IHD after completion of treatment. The majority of patients had received ABVD alone and had a lower incidence of CV disease at 15 y when compared to those that received treatment that included mediastinal RT. These results will inform counseling regarding risk factor modification and aid in the development of surveillance guidelines for AYA survivors. Disclosures Gerrie: Sandoz: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding. Villa:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nano String: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria; Immunovaccine: Consultancy, Honoraria; Purdue Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scott:NIH: Consultancy, Other: Co-inventor on a patent related to the MCL35 assay filed at the National Institutes of Health, United States of America.; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Named inventor on a patent licensed to NanoString, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sehn:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apobiologix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria. Savage:BeiGene: Other: Steering Committee; Roche (institutional): Research Funding; Merck, BMS, Seattle Genetics, Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Servier: Consultancy; Merck, BMS, Seattle Genetics, Gilead, AstraZeneca, AbbVie: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document