scholarly journals Patterns and Predictors of Emicizumab Adherence in People with Hemophilia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2178-2178
Author(s):  
Ang Li ◽  
Catlin Goodfriend ◽  
John Sokol ◽  
Rebecca Kruse-Jarres
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Skewed Distribution ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Active Inhibitor ◽  
Routine Prophylaxis

Introduction: Emicizumab is a subcutaneously administered, humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody that is recently approved for hemostatic prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A (PWH) with or without factor VIII inhibitors. We hypothesize that the new route and frequency of administration would lead to better treatment adherence compared to factor or bypass products in PWH outside of clinical trials. We performed the current study to test the hypothesis and to examine potential predictors of non-adherence associated with emicizumab treatment. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at the Washington Center for Bleeding Disorders. Inclusion criteria included PWH with moderate to severe hereditary hemophilia (FVIII <5%), clinician recommendation for routine prophylaxis, receipt of clinical care and medication from a hemophilia treatment center (HTC), at least 12 months of prior exposure to factor or bypass products, and at least 3 months of emicizumab treatment. For patients who were previously enrolled in emicizumab clinical trials, adherence data were collected from the time of first commercial product administration. Adherence percentage (%) was estimated as days of drug dispensed / days elapsed x 100 and non-adherence % was determined as 100 - adherence %. Relevant patient, condition, treatment, and socioeconomic variable data were collected from review of medical records. To assess the difference in drug adherence, we compared the adherence % of emicizumab versus that of factor or bypass product in the same patients using the paired t test. To assess predictors of non-adherence %, we used a generalized linear model (GLM) with log link and gamma distribution to account for the right skewed distribution of the outcome. A multivariable GLM was built to incorporate the most significant predictors of non-adherence. Results: We identified 56 PWH that initiated commercial emicizumab from 1/2018 to 5/2019 at our HTC. Five patients were excluded for fewer than 3 months of follow-up on treatment and 3 patients were excluded for not having prior exposure to factor therapy. The remaining 48 patients had a median duration on emicizumab of 7 months (IQR 5-9) at the time of study. The most common dosing frequency was weekly administration (77%). The median age at treatment index date was 17 years (IQR 9-36), 65% were Caucasian, and 46% had Medicaid or Medicare insurance. The majority of patients had a diagnosis of severe hemophilia (90%), 42% had a history of inhibitor (15% active inhibitor), and 25% were previously enrolled in an emicizumab interventional trial. Prior to emicizumab initiation, 46% of patients had 5 or more self-reported annualized bleeds. The most common reason for emicizumab initiation was patient preference (35%), followed by breakthrough bleeding (33%), difficult venipuncture (21%), and shortened factor half-life (10%). Among 12 patients who previously received only on demand treatment, their adherence on emicizumab was 89%. Among 36 patients who previously received routine prophylaxis, their adherence was significantly higher on emicizumab (98%) than factor/bypass products (89%) (p=0.002). Specifically, 18 out of 48 patients (38%) had factor/bypass adherence <75% (or refused prophylaxis) and 2 out of 48 patients (4%) had emicizumab adherence <75%. Various factors were associated with increased emicizumab non-adherence (Table 1). Age group had the strongest association where young and older adult PWH had more non-adherence % than children and adolescents (Figure 1). On multivariable analysis, age group, active inhibitor, and prior factor/bypass agent non-adherence (episodic or <75% usage) were significantly associated with increased emicizumab non-adherence. Conclusions: In the current study, we found that PWH requiring routine prophylaxis were more likely to be adherent to emicizumab than previous factor or bypass agents. Age group (young adult), active inhibitor, and prior non-adherence to factor product were significant predictors for decreased emicizumab adherence but the differences were small. Given the long half-life of the drug, the significance of non-perfect adherence on bleeding outcomes needs to be studied prospectively with longer clinical follow-up. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Struggling With Extensive Informed Consent Procedures for Cancer Trails – Is There Even a Benefit for the Patients?

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Kristin Tilch ◽  
Alice Moringlane ◽  
Melanie Schranz ◽  
Matthias Theobald ◽  
Georg Hess
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Informed Consent Form ◽  
Objective Understanding

Abstract PurposeInformed consent procedures in clinical trials often differ in length and complexity to those in clinical routine care. Little is known about the benefit of extensive procedures as intended in clinical trials compared to procedures in routine cancer treatment. MethodsIn two different clinical studies performed at a comprehensive cancer center, we compared patients’ comprehension and satisfaction of current informed consent procedures in routine clinical care with the level of comprehension and satisfaction of patients treated within clinical trials. Patients with a new cancer diagnosis and recent informed consent received a questionnaire about satisfaction, comprehension, time management and physician-patient relationship of the informed consent process. Patients in cohort 1 consented to cancer treatment within a clinical trial and were additionally interviewed in a structured way; patients in cohort 2 consented to “standard” chemotherapy and received a follow-up questionnaire after 6 months. ResultsIn cohort 1, 82 patients completed the questionnaire and had an additional structured interview. They were treated in 41 different trials, receiving up to 40 pages of educational material. In cohort 2, 89 patients completed the first and 52 completed the follow-up questionnaire after receiving a standard informed consent form of 6 pages. Subjective understanding and satisfaction with the information provided was equally very high. However, deficits in objective understanding were observed in both cohorts. ConclusionExtensive informed consent procedures for clinical cancer trials have not been associated with a higher level of satisfaction or measurable objective understanding, therefore the benefit seems to be limited.

scholarly journals Real-World Use of Emicizumab in Patients with Hemophilia with and without Inhibitors

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1137-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella McCary ◽  
Christine Guelcher ◽  
Jan Kuhn ◽  
Regina Butler ◽  
Gita Massey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real World ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Active Inhibitor ◽  
The Difference

Introduction Emicizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that bridges factor IXa and Factor Xa and is administered via subcutaneous injection. After initial FDA approval for patients with hemophilia A (HA) and inhibitors, it was approved in October 2018 for prophylaxis in patients with HA without inhibitors of all ages. In clinical trials of subjects without inhibitors, emicizumab was studied only in those >12 years of age. The primary objective of this study was to report our "real-world", post-licensure experience with emicizumab across a more heterogenous patient population, comparing annualized bleeding rates prior to and after initiating emicizumab. Secondary objectives included evaluating for serious adverse events including death, thrombosis or drug discontinuation. Methods We conducted a multi-center observational study at 3 federally funded Hemophilia Treatment Centers: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Virginia Commonwealth University and Children's National Health System. Inclusion criteria included patients with HA initiated on emicizumab prior to May 15th 2019. Data extraction included: demographics, diagnosis, prior HA history (inhibitor, prophylaxis treatment regimen), emicizumab dosing data, bleeding events (all bleeds, treated bleeds, joint bleeds, traumatic bleeds) and thrombotic events from the 6 months prior to emicizumab until July 15th 2019. Annualized bleeding rates (ABR) were calculated to account for variable follow up. Wilcoxon Sign-Rank Difference Test was used to test the difference in number of bleeds and McNemar's test was used to test the difference in proportions of patients with ABR=0. Results Ninety-two patients met inclusion criteria: 89 male and 89 with severe HA (3 moderate HA) (Table 1). Age at initiation of emicizumab ranged from 5 weeks to 55 years; median 8.6 yrs (IQR 4.8-13.5 yrs). Nineteen patients had an active inhibitor at the time of starting emicizumab; the remaining 73 did not have an inhibitor, and most (86%) were on prophylaxis prior to emicizumab. Sixty-two patients were < 12 years of age (13 with inhibitors). Median duration of emicizumab therapy was 48 weeks (inhibitors) and 22 weeks (non-inhibitors), with a total follow up of 53.3 patient years. In patients with inhibitors, the ABR (treated bleeds) prior to emicizumab was 6.2 events (95% CI, 0.98 to 11.4) compared to 0.3 events (95% CI, 0 to 0.73) on emicizumab, p=0.002. In subjects without inhibitors, the ABR prior to emicizumab was 1.8 events (95% CI, 0.66 to 2.96) compared to 0.22 events (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.39) on emicizumab, p<0.001. Additional data on bleeding events is provided in Table 1. The proportion of patients with ABR=0 increased in both inhibitor (from 46% to 74%, p=0.06) and non-inhibitor subjects (from 60 to 78%, p=0.015). All patients received 1.5 mg/kg weekly x 4 loading doses, followed by either weekly (27%), every other week (70%), or monthly (3%) dosing; patients with inhibitors were more likely to receive weekly dosing. No patients who initiated emicizumab discontinued the drug or developed a neutralizing antibody to FVIII or emicizumab, although patients have not been consistently screened for these antibodies. No thrombotic or thrombotic microangiopathy events or death have occurred. Conclusions Our favorable clinical experience with emicizumab post-licensure in patients with HA is similar to that reported in the clinical trials. Although excluded from the clinical trials, patients with HA without inhibitors < 12 years accounted for the majority (67%) of our cohort. As anticipated, these younger patients appear to experience the same benefit as patients > 12. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported, although the overall study period is relatively short. Ongoing follow up of these patients, and others, will be important to assess the ongoing safety and efficacy profile of this novel therapy. Updated data on this cohort will be presented at the ASH meeting Disclosures Guelcher: NovoNordisk: Other: Advisory Board; Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Other: Advisory Board; Genetech: Other: Advisory Board. Butler:pfizer: Other: Advisory board; Hema-Biologics: Consultancy; genetech: Other: Advisory board. Guerrera:Genetech: Other: Advisory Board; Kendrion: Other: Advisory Board; Shire: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy. Raffini:Roche: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board.

scholarly journals Classifications of diabetic macular edema

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Lee M Jampol
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Diabetic Maculopathy ◽  
Experimental Trials

Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause worldwide of vision loss from diabetic maculopathy or proliferative retinopathy. Without widely accepted classifications of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic maculopathy, it is difficult to compare results of clinical trials or monitor clinical care. The European School of Advanced Studies in Ophthalmology has developed an international classification of diabetic maculopathy based upon spectral domain optical coherence tomography, which could be helpful for both initial evaluation and subsequent follow-up of diabetic patients in both clinical practice and experimental trials.

BNP in children with congenital cardiac disease: is there now sufficient evidence for its routine use?

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Cantinotti ◽  
Henry L. Walters ◽  
Maura Crocetti ◽  
Marco Marotta ◽  
Bruno Murzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Blood Specimens ◽  
The Individual

AbstractInterest in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the management of children with CHD has increased. There are, however, no current guidelines for their routine use. The aim of this review article is to provide an update on the data regarding the use of BNP/NT-proBNP in the evaluation and surgical treatment of children with CHD. BNP/NT-proBNP levels in children with CHD vary substantially according to age, laboratory assay methods, and the specific haemodynamics associated with the individual congenital heart lesion. The accuracy of BNP/NT-proBNP as supplemental markers in the integrated screening, diagnosis, management, and follow-up of CHD has been established. In particular, the use of BNP/NT-proBNP as a prognostic indicator in paediatric cardiac surgery has been widely demonstrated, as well as its role in the subsequent follow-up of surgical patients. Most of the data, however, are derived from single-centre retrospective studies using multivariable analysis; prospective, randomised clinical trials designed to evaluate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of routine BNP/NT-proBNP use in CHD are lacking. The results of well-designed, prospective clinical trials should assist in formulating guidelines and expert consensus recommendations for its use in patients with CHD. Finally, the use of new point-of-care testing methods that use less invasive sampling techniques – capillary blood specimens – may contribute to a more widespread use of the BNP assay, especially in neonates and infants, as well as contribute to the development of screening programmes for CHD using this biomarker.

scholarly journals Real-world clinical experience of extended half-life recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in comparison to conventional factor products in patients with severe hemophilia A

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (05) ◽  
pp. 950-960
Author(s):  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Georg Goldmann ◽  
Natascha Marquardt ◽  
Silvia Horneff ◽  
Claudia Klein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Real World ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Fc Fusion Protein ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Number Of Injections

Introduction: The recombinant factor FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) is a first-in-class extended half-life FVIII product to treat patients with hemophilia A. The safety, efficacy and prolonged half-life of rFVIIIFc was demonstrated in the phase 3 studies A-LONG, Kids A-LONG and the extension study ASPIRE. Despite robust efficacy and safety data of rFVIIIFc therapy from clinical trials, evidence on the effectiveness of rFVIIIFc use in real-world remains scarce. Our analysis aimed at investigating the effectiveness of prophylactic rFVIIIFc treatment in routine clinical use in Germany. Material and Methods: Twenty-seven patients with severe hemophilia A, who switched from prophylaxis with conventional recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products to rFVIIIFc, were included. Annualized bleeding rates, factor consumption, number of injections and adherence to prophylaxis were compared. The retrospective period prior switching to rFVIIIFc was three years, while the mean follow-up period after switching to rFVIIIFc was 24.9 months. Results: Switching to rFVIIIFc led to a 33.7% reduction in mean annualized number of injections and a 18.3% reduction in mean annualized factor consumption while maintaining low bleeding rates. The mean annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 2.5 and 1.7 for rFVIII and rFVIIIFc, respectively. The adherence improved from 87% to 94%. During the follow-up period eleven surgeries were performed; all with a hemostatic response rated as excellent. No FVIII inhibitor formation after switching to rFVIIIFc has been detected. Conclusion: Real-world treatment with rFVIIIFc was associated with substantial reductions in consumption and injection frequenies while maintaining low bleeding rates supporting safety and efficacy data from clinical trials.

scholarly journals OP0273 THE SCLERODERMA CLINICAL TRIALS CONSORTIUM DAMAGE INDEX (SCTC-DI) IN A SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS COHORT WITH 10-YEARS FOLLOW-UP

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 166.2-166
Author(s):  
M. G. Lazzaroni ◽  
M. Breda ◽  
F. Franceschini ◽  
P. Airò
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Damage Index ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Severe Damage ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Cutaneous Involvement ◽  
Male Sex

Background:Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by increased mortality and organ damage accrual. A composite SSc Damage Index was recently developed by the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC-DI) and was demonstrated as a predictor of mortality both in the Australian derivation cohort and in the Canadian validation cohort.Objectives:To evaluate in a single centre cohort of SSc patients with 10-years follow-up: (1) the evolution of organ damage over time; (2) factors associated with the development and accrual of organ damage.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on patients prospectively followed in our centre from 1989 to 2019. Organ damage was evaluated with SCTC-DI (0-55 scale; moderate damage >5, severe damage>12) and comorbidities with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI, which includes the age of the patient). Patients were included when a follow-up of at least 10 years was available together with SCTC-DI at the diagnosis (baseline, T0), 1 year (T1), 5 years (T5) and 10 years (T10) after the diagnosis. Univariable and multivariable analysis (logistic regression) were performed when appropriated.Results:253 SSc patients were included (female 93%; Caucasians: 99%; median age at diagnosis: 52 years (IQR: 43-60); diffuse cutaneous subset: 15%; anti-centromere (ACA)+ 55%; anti-Topoisomerase 1 + 20%; anti-RNA polymerase III+: 4%; ever smokers: 28%). Median interval between the first SSc symptom other than Raynaud’s phenomenon and the diagnosis was 1 year. SCTC-DI progressively increased from diagnosis to T10 (p<0.0001; Kruskal-Wallis test).Moderate damage (score:6-12) was observed in 22 patients at T0 (8.7%), in 30 at T1 (11.9%), in 45 at T5 (17.7%) and in 73 at T10 (28.9%). None of the patients had severe damage (score:13-55) at T0 and T1, while it was present in 6 at T5 (2.4%) and in 13 at T10 (5.1%).At T0 no difference in SCTC-DI scores was observed when comparing different subgroups according to gender (female vs. male), disease subsets (diffuse vs. limited) and autoantibodies (ACA- vs. ACA+). At T1, SCTC-DI score was higher in patients with diffuse vs. limited cutaneous subset, and ACA- vs ACA+ (p<0.0001 for both).Multivariable analysis demonstrated that a moderate or severe organ damage (SCTC-DI score >5) at 5 years was positively associated with diffuse cutaneous involvement (p:0.009, OR 4.55, 1.46-14.1), SCTC-DI at T0 (p:0.015, OR 1.34, 1.06-1.70) and at T1 (p:<0.0001, OR 1.65, 1.30-2.07), and negatively associated with ACA+ (p:0.024, OR 0.32, 0.12-0.86), while CCI and male sex showed no association. At 10 years SCTC-DI>5 was associated with diffuse cutaneous involvement (p:0.013, OR 4.30, 1.36-13.7), SCTC-DI at T5 (p:<0.0001, OR 1.67, 1.38-2.01), while SCTC-DI at T0, CCI, male sex and ACA+ had no association.Among 253 patients, 90 (36%) died after >10 years of follow-up. In non-survivors, as compared to survivors, SCTC-DI score was significantly higher at the baseline (T0) and during the entire follow-up (p<0.0001 for every timepoint).Conclusion:At the end of 10-years follow-up (T10), 35% of patients in our cohort had moderate or severe organ damage (SCTC-DI score>5). Diffuse cutaneous involvement was associated with higher SCTC-DI scores at different time points (T5 and T10). Organ damage, quantified by SCTC-DI at different time points, was confirmed as a factor associated with mortality in patients who reached more than 10 years of follow-up.References:[1]Ferdowsi N, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:807-16.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Biomarkers of Acromegaly and Growth Hormone Action

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1231-1245
Author(s):  
Filippo Maffezzoni ◽  
Teresa Porcelli ◽  
Andrea Delbarba ◽  
Letizia Pezzaioli ◽  
Carlo Cappelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Biological Markers ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Hormone Deficiency ◽  
Surrogate Outcomes ◽  
Current State ◽  
Growth Hormone Action ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Definition Of

: Biological markers (biomarkers) play a key role in drug development, regulatory approval and clinical care of patients and are linked to clinical and surrogate outcomes. : Both acromegaly and Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) are pathological conditions related to important comorbidities that, in addition to having stringent diagnostic criteria, require valid markers for the definition of treatment, treatment monitoring and follow-up. GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) are the main biomarkers of GH action in children and adults while, in acromegaly, both GH and IGF-I are established biomarkers of disease activity. : However, although GH and IGF-I are widely validated biomarkers of GHD and acromegaly, their role is not completely exhaustive or suitable for clinical classification and follow-up. Therefore, new biological markers for acromegaly and GH replacement therapy are strongly needed. : The aim of this paper is to review and summarize the current state in the field pointing out new potential biomarkers for acromegaly and GH use/abuse.

scholarly journals The importance of maternal pregnancy vitamin D for offspring bone health: learnings from the MAVIDOS trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2110069
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Moon ◽  
Elizabeth M. Curtis ◽  
Stephen J. Woolford ◽  
Shanze Ashai ◽  
Cyrus Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Bone Development ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Later Life ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Public Health Policies ◽  
Positive Effects

Optimisation of skeletal mineralisation in childhood is important to reduce childhood fracture and the long-term risk of osteoporosis and fracture in later life. One approach to achieving this is antenatal vitamin D supplementation. The Maternal Vitamin D Osteoporosis Study is a randomised placebo-controlled trial, the aim of which was to assess the effect of antenatal vitamin D supplementation (1000 IU/day cholecalciferol) on offspring bone mass at birth. The study has since extended the follow up into childhood and diversified to assess demographic, lifestyle and genetic factors that determine the biochemical response to antenatal vitamin D supplementation, and to understand the mechanisms underpinning the effects of vitamin D supplementation on offspring bone development, including epigenetics. The demonstration of positive effects of maternal pregnancy vitamin D supplementation on offspring bone development and the delineation of underlying biological mechanisms inform clinical care and future public-health policies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document