scholarly journals Updated Outcomes during the Pandemic: Relationship between CD34and CD3 Cell Doses, One-Year Graft-Versus-Relapse-Free-Survival, Graft-Versus-Host Disease, and Overall Survival in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Post Transplant Cytoxan: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1773-1773
Author(s):  
Anastasia Martynova ◽  
Krithika Chennapan ◽  
Jack Rodman ◽  
Mindy Hsiao ◽  
Abdullah Ladha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
P Value ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cell Dose ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Background: Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional HLA-matched hematopoietic cell transplant. The major advancement of haplo-HCT has increased donor availability to many patients in need, therefore investigating the factors that may affect outcomes is necessary to improve overall survival and reduce transplant-related mortality. Data regarding optimal dose of CD34 cells, CD3 cells and CD34/CD3 ratio used during haplo-HCT to ensure favorable outcomes with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is lacking. Previously we have reported improved outcomes using CD34 cells limited to 7x10^6 cells/kg or less. In this report we are presenting an updated analysis including outcomes related to CD34/CD3 ratio used during haplo-HCT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients at USC Norris Cancer Hospital who received haplo-HCT from 2014 to 2020. The primary endpoint assessed was 1-year GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), 1-year transplant related mortality (TRM) and incidence of acute and chronic GVHD. Kaplan Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to evaluate 1-year GRFS and OS with CD34 cell dose ≥ 7x10^6 cells/kg and < 7x10^6 cells/kg; CD3 cell dose < 2.5x10^8 cells/kg and ≥ 2.5x10^8 cells/kg; and CD34/CD3 ratio <2, 2-3, >3-5 and >5. Results: 103 adult haplo-HCT recipients were reviewed with 55.3% male and 44.7% female. The age range was 21-71 years old (median = 51), and a majority of patients were Hispanic (62%). The most common underlying hematologic disorders included AML (40.8%), ALL (34.1%), and MDS/MPN (13.6 %). 41.7% patients with leukemia were in CR1, 55% were CR2/CR3 and 78% were MRD negative by flow cytometry prior to transplant. 73% received myeloablative conditioning and 83.5% received peripheral blood stem cells. Median CD34 dose, CD3 dose and CD34/CD3 ratio were 6.1 x10^6cells/kg, 2.27 x10^8 cells/kg and 3.2 respectively. Median time to recovery of neutrophil, platelets, and lymphocyte was 17, 24, and 124 days respectively. Incidence of 1-year GRFS was 43.7%. 1-year TRM was 13.6% and rate of aGVHD and cGVHD was 42.7% (n = 44) and 35.9% (n = 37) respectively. There was no difference in 1-year GRFS and OS when multiple dose levels of CD34 cells and CD3 cells were compared. Although when dichotomized, a CD34 cell dose of ≥ 7x10^6 cells/kg compared to < 7x10^6 cells/kg showed higher dose had significant improvement in 1- year overall survival (p-value=0.01) but no statistical difference in 1 year GRFS (p value=0.24). CD3 cell dose < 2.5 x 10^8 cells/kg trended towards worse 1-Year GRFS compared to ≥ 2.5 x 10^8 cells/kg (43.9% compared to 58.6%; p-value 0.075), similarly CD3 dose of < 2.5x10^8 cells/kg showed a lower 1-year OS compared to > 2.5x10^8 cells/kg but was not statistically significant (78.7% compared to 89.4%; p-value 0.092). 1-year GRFS and OS did not show statistical difference at CD34:CD3 ratios of < 2, 2-3, 3-5 and > 5, although on cox regression analysis the HR for 1-year GRFS was 2.92 (95% CI 1.21-7.05) in patients with CD34:CD3 > 5 as compared to reference of < 2 (p-value 0.017). Multivariate regression also showed CD3 cell doses of 2-3x10^8 cells/kg and >3 x 10^8 cells/kg were associated with worse 1-year GRFS with HR of 0.43 and 0.40 and p-value of 0.041 and 0.048 respectively when compared to reference of < 1x10^8 CD3 cells/kg. Discussion: Our results demonstrate 43.7% survived 1 year compared with reports of 24-35%. The OS was significantly better in the CD34 dose > 7x10^6 cells/kg. CD3 <2.5x10^8 cells/kg showed a trend towards lower 1-year GRFS and OS, which was not statistically significant. On multivariate analysis CD3 dose of > 2x10^8 cells/kg was associated with inferior 1-year GRFS. Conversely, higher CD34/CD3 ratio >5 was associated with increased 1-year GRFS. Thus, our findings indicate that along with improvement in OS by using >7x10^6 CD34 cells/kg, lower CD 3 cell dose <2x10^8 cells/kg and higher CD34/CD3 ratio > 5 can improve 1-year GRFS in patients receiving haplo-HCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chaudhary: Angeles Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder, Patents & Royalties: Cell therapy ; Athelas: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Oncotartis: Consultancy; Pancella: Consultancy; Moderna: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celldex: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; TCR2: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yaghmour: Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Investigating the Relationship between CD34+and CD3+ Cell Doses, One-Year Graft-Versus-Relapse-Free-Survival, Graft-Versus-Host Disease, and Overall Survival in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2051-2051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mindy Hsiao ◽  
Anastasia Martynova ◽  
George Yaghmour ◽  
Chris Foss
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Related Mortality

Background: Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional HLA-matched hematopoietic cell transplant. As the number of haplo-HCT's rises, investigating the factors that may affect outcomes is necessary in order to improve overall survival and reduce transplant-related mortality. The optimal dose of CD34+ cells used during haplo-HCT to ensure favorable outcomes using PTCy has not yet been reported though a range of 2 to 5.00x106 cells/kg is commonly used.Furthermore, the optimal dose of CD3+ cells is unknown however recent data has suggested less than 3.00x108 cells/kg may prevent the development of acute GVHD. The importance of studying the impact of CD34+/CD3+ cell dosing may help to improve outcomes in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients at USC Norris Cancer Hospital (age ≥ 21) who received haplo-HCT from 2014 to 2019. The primary end-point assessed was 1-year GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) defined as grade 3-4 acute GVHD, systemic therapy-requiring chronic GVHD, relapse, or death in the first post-HCT year. Secondary end-points included 1-, 2-, and 3-year relapse-related mortality (RRM) and overall survival (OS) in addition to 1-year transplant related mortality (TRM) and incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD. Results: A total of 67 adult haplo-HCT recipients were reviewed. Of the patients evaluated, approximately 50% (n = 33) were male and 49% (n = 32) were female. The age range was 21-71 years old (median = 44), and the most common underlying hematologic disorders included AML (40%), ALL (38%), aplastic anemia (7.7%), and others (MDS, lymphoma, myelofibrosis, and HLH) (13.8%). 67% of patients received myeloablative conditioning regimens while 33% received reduced intensity regimens. 70% (n = 47) of patients received peripheral blood as a stem cell source with 30% (n = 20) receiving bone marrow. The mean CD34+ dose infused was 6.07x106 cells/kg and the mean CD3+ dose was 2.94x108 cells/kg. The mean time to recovery of platelets, neutrophils, and lymphocytes was 25, 18, and 37 days respectively. CD34+ stem cells ≥5.00x106 cells/kg was significantly associated with shorter time to lymphocyte recovery (p = 0.0265) though recovery less than 30 days was not significantly associated with OS (p = 0.5268). Incidence of 1-year GRFS was 71% (n= 46) and 1-, 2-, and 3-year RRM were 4.6%, 6%, and 7.7% respectively. 1-year TRM was 15.3% with 50% of deaths from acute GVHD. 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were 80%, 78%, and 77% respectively. Factors significantly associated with increased mortality included use of RIC regimen (p = 0.004) and disease status at time of transplant (p = 0.04). Cumulative incidence of GVHD was 63% (n = 42) with 33% (n = 22) and 30% of patients (n = 20) with acute and chronic GVHD respectively. Lack of mild chronic GVHD was associated with increased mortality (p = 0.0029) and use of a myeloablative regimen (p = 0.0029) was significantly associated with GVHD. Subgroup analysis of those who received CD34+ dose ≥7.00x106 cells/kg (n = 24) and ≥10x106 cells/kg (n = 7) were found to have 1-year OS of 87.5% and 85.7% compared with 77% and 80% in those that received lower doses (p= 0.2229 and p = 1.00) respectively however this was not found to be significantly associated with increased incidence of GVHD, relapse, or mortality. Discussion: Our results demonstrate improved outcomes specifically 71% survived 1 year without experiencing at least 1 GRFS event compared with 24-35% reported by CIBMTR, Holtan et al 2015, and Solh et al 2016 with 3-year OS of 77% when compared with a previously reported 48%. The mean CD34+ cell dose of our population is higher than the standard range which may account for the improved outcomes however the dosing of CD34+/CD3+ cells were not significantly associated with our primary and secondary end-points. It was significantly associated, however, with shorter time to lymphocyte recovery, a factor that has been reported to be associated with decreased RRM and therefore improved OS. Furthermore, subgroup analysis of higher CD34+ dose did show a better 1-year OS though this was not statistically significant. Limitations of this study include small sample size and short follow-up period. Further research with a prospective study identifying the optimal CD34+/CD3+ cell dose in addition to comprehensive evaluation of immune recovery is warranted in order to improve haplo-HCT outcomes. Figure Disclosures Yaghmour: Jazz Pharmaceutical company: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astella company: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes from Updated Zuma-5 (Axicabtagene Ciloleucel) and the International Scholar-5 External Control Cohort in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (R/R FL)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3543-3543
Author(s):  
M. Lia Palomba ◽  
Paola Ghione ◽  
Anik R. Patel ◽  
Kevin Deighton ◽  
Caron Jacobson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
External Control ◽  
Control Cohort ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Background: In the pivotal ZUMA-5 (Z-5) trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable response in r/r FL patients, including those with high-risk disease such as patients who progressed within 24 months of initiating first-line chemoimmunotherapy (POD24). Aims: To compare clinical outcomes from updated 24-month Z-5 to a weighted sample from the international SCHOLAR-5 (S-5) external control cohort. Methods: The international S-5 cohort data were extracted for r/r FL patients from 7 institutions in 5 countries who initiated a third or higher (3L+) line of therapy (LOT) after July 2014. Data from the pivotal idelalisib DELTA trial was also included in the S-5 cohort. Z-5 trial eligibility criteria were applied to the S-5 cohort, with patients excluded or censored upon transformation. The S-5 and Z-5 cohorts were balanced for patient characteristics through propensity scoring on prespecified prognostic factors and standardized mortality ratio weighting. Characteristics with a standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.1 were deemed balanced. Overall response rate (ORR) was compared using odds ratio. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and next treatment-free survival (NTFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Subgroup analysis was conducted on patients who initiated a fourth or higher (4L+) LOT. Results: 143 patients were identified in S-5, reducing to 85 patients after applying propensity score weights, versus 86 patients in Z-5. Median follow-up time for Z-5 and S-5 were 29.4 and 26.2 months respectively. Variables that were successfully balanced (SMD<0.1) included POD24, number of prior LOT, relapsed vs refractory, prior stem cell transplant, size of largest nodal mass, response to prior LOT, time since last therapy and age (Table 1). Despite weighting, the S-5 cohort had a higher proportion of ECOG 1 vs 0 (66.9% vs 40.7%) at baseline. In 3L+ patients, the ORR was 42/85 (49.9%) in S-5 compared to 81/86 (94.2%) in Z-5 for an odds ratio of 16.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.6-46.9). The median OS was not reached in Z-5 while median PFS was 39.6 months. In S-5 median OS and PFS were 59.8 months and 12.7 months, respectively (Table 2). The hazard ratios for OS and PFS were 0.52 (95%CI: 0.28-0.95) and 0.28 (0.17-0.45) (Figure 1). In sub-group analysis of 4L+ patients, which compared 60 patients from Z-5 to 59 patients from S-5, improvements in OS and PFS outcomes were more pronounced (Table 2). Summary/Conclusion: Compared to currently available therapies in r/r FL patients, axi-cel demonstrated a substantial and statistically significant improvement in meaningful clinical endpoints including ORR, PFS, NTFS and OS, highlighting the durable treatment effect of axi-cel. These findings suggest that axi-cel addresses an important unmet medical need for r/r FL patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Palomba: PCYC: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Juno: Patents & Royalties; Pluto: Honoraria; Wolters Kluwer: Patents & Royalties; Kite: Consultancy; Notch: Honoraria, Other: Stock; Seres: Honoraria, Other: Stock, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Priothera: Honoraria; Nektar: Honoraria; Lygenesis: Honoraria; Magenta: Honoraria; Rheos: Honoraria; WindMIL: Honoraria; Ceramedix: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Patel: Kite, A Gilead company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Deighton: Delta Hat: Current Employment. Jacobson: Lonza: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nkarta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Axis: Speakers Bureau; Humanigen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support. Nahas: Kite: Current Employment; Gilead: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jung: Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Amgen, Kura, Gilead, and Turning Point: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hatswell: Delta Hat: Current Employment. Kanters: RainCity Analytics: Current Employment. Limbrick-Oldfield: RainCity Analytics: Current Employment. Wade: Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Allergan: Consultancy. Thornton Snider: Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Gilead: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Neelapu: Takeda Pharmaceuticals and related to cell therapy: Patents & Royalties; Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene Therapeutics, Cell Medica/Kuur, Incyte, Precision Biosciences, Legend Biotech, Adicet Bio, Calibr, Unum Therapeutics and Bluebird Bio: Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene, Kuur, Incyte, Precision BioSciences, Legend, Adicet Bio, Calibr, and Unum Therapeutics: Other: personal fees; Kite, a Gilead Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Poseida, Cellectis, Celgene, Karus Therapeutics, Unum Therapeutics (Cogent Biosciences), Allogene, Precision BioSciences, Acerta and Adicet Bio: Research Funding. Gribben: Abbvie: Honoraria; AZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Morphosys: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; TG Therapeutis: Honoraria. Radford: ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; BMS: Honoraria. Bobillo: Gilead: Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Ghesquieres: Gilead Science: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Predictors of Outcomes in Adult Patients with Therapy Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - Twenty Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5737-5737
Author(s):  
RAM V Nampoothiri ◽  
Arjun Law ◽  
Wilson Lam ◽  
Zeyad Al-Shaibani ◽  
David Loach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
P Value ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background Therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) constitutes a subset of AML that has an increased proportion of high risk cytogenetic and molecular features, poor response to therapy, higher relapse, and decreased overall survival. The incidence ranges from 10-20% across various studies. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers a potential cure in t-AML, with disease free survival reported up to 30% at 2 years. Most studies on HSCT in t-AML have limited number of patients and are confounded by the inclusion of patients with secondary AML and therapy related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS). We aim to report our 20-year experience of allo-HSCT in t-AML and identify predictors of survival. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed all cases of t-AML who underwent allo-HSCT at our centre from June 1999 to July 2019. We collected data for demographic characteristics, prior malignancy and treatment, latent period before AML, cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of AML, induction treatment received, transplant details (donor details, conditioning regimens, GVHD prophylaxis) as well as post-transplant complications (transplant related mortality, occurrence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD, CMV and EBV reactivations). Primary outcome evaluated was overall survival and secondary outcomes were relapse rate and relapse free survival (RFS). Cox-proportional hazards regression model was used to identify predictors of survival. Results Fifty-two patients underwent allo-HSCT for t-AML during the study period. 58% were male (n=30). Median age at HSCT was 55.5 years (Range 18-70). Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Complex cytogenetics were present in 23.2% (n=12) patients, while 11q23 rearrangement (MLL-KMT2A), monosomy 7, monosomy 5, and 17p deletion were present in 15.4% (n = 8), 15.4% (n= 8), 7.7% (n = 4) and 7.7% (n=4) patients respectively. Based on the ELN 2017 risk stratification schema, 13.5% (n=7) patients could be considered favorable risk based on cytogenetic and molecular profiles, 36.5% (n=19) intermediate risk, and 57.7% (n=30) in poor risk category. Performance status prior to transplant was ECOG 0/1 in 71.2% (n=37) patients, and 2 in 28.8% (n=15) patients. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 30.8% (n=16) patients, and reduced intensity conditioning in 69.2% (n=36). GVHD prophylaxis was CyclosporineA(CSA)/Methotrexate in 23.1% (n=12), Alemtuzumab/CSA in 21.2% (n=11), ATG/CSA/PTCy in 28.8% (n=15), and other regimens in 26.9% (n=14) patients. Transplant related mortality (death before day+100) was 21.1% (n=11). Acute and chronic GVHD (any grade) occurred in 61.5% (n = 32) and 28.8% (n=15) patients respectively. Eleven patients (21.2%) relapsed with a median RFS of 8 months (Range 0.17-158). Median OS of the whole cohort was 8.9 months (0.17-158 months). No patient had a relapse of their primary malignancy during follow up. RFS at 12 and 24 months were 46% and 28% while OS at 1 and 2 years was 46% and 30%, respectively. Significant predictors of reduced OS (Figure 1a,b,c) after day+100 of HSCT by Cox-regression were ECOG performance status 2 (Hazard ratio - 6.1; p value 0.003), GVHD prophylaxis with CSA/methotrexate (HR - 4.5; p value 0.01), and haploidentical donor transplantation (HR - 34; p value - 0.002). Cytogenetics were a predictor of OS in univariate analysis but not in multivariate regression analysis. No difference in OS was found between patients who underwent HSCT 2010 or prior versus after 2010. Conclusions Patients with favorable cytogenetic profile, better performance status, and an HLA matched donor may have better outcomes after allo-HSCT in therapy related AML. Patients with unfavorable cytogenetic risk profiles may require more intense therapy or post-transplant maintenance therapy to prevent relapse. Disclosures Michelis: CSL Behring: Other: Financial Support. Mattsson:Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria.

scholarly journals An Update on Outcomes Using the USC ALL Frontline Regimen (based on CCG-1882) after Further Modification of Protocol in the Era of Novel Agents in Ph-Negative ALL Patients; A Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3362-3362
Author(s):  
Vincent Louie Mendiola ◽  
Catherine Ly ◽  
Thuy Bui ◽  
Jennifer Wang ◽  
Jack Rodman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Post Induction ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The use of pediatric inspired regimens in adolescent young adults and adults has improved outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). CALGB 10403 was prospectively tested in patients 17-39 years, showing a 3-year event free survival of 59%. In 2007, our institution reported outcomes after incorporating peg-asparaginase (PEG) dosed at 2000mg/m 2 in induction for patients aged 17- 55 years. This regimen was well tolerated and resulted in a complete remission (CR) rate of 96%. In 2014, we reported experience with the use of multiple doses of PEG (CCG-1882) for newly diagnosed ALL adult patients, with a 7-year overall survival (OS) of 51%. Since our last report, the USC ALL regimen consisting of 2 induction phases, has been further modified with a goal of maintaining good outcomes, and improving compliance and toxicities. Fractionated doses of cytarabine were changed to a single dose, the methotrexate dose of 1g/m 2 (2.5 g/m 2 if T-cell) given D1,15 of intensification phases was changed to 3g/m 2 (B and T cell) given in single doses, and consolidation was increased to six cycles allowing for PEG holidays (Table 1). Moreover, the approval and incorporation of novel agents such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab also changed outcomes in ALL. Therefore, this study reports an update of outcomes since further modification of the USC ALL pediatric-based regimen in the era of novel agents. METHODS: This is a retrospective review which included adults aged >18 with newly diagnosed Philadelphia negative ALL between 2016 and 2020 treated at USC/Norris Cancer Center and Los Angeles County Hospital (LAC). Primary objectives were over-all survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years, and secondary outcomes were complete remission/complete remission with incomplete recovery (CR/CRi) rates and minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry. OS, DFS, EFS were reported through Kaplan Meier curves and Log-rank tests. Two-sided p value ≤0.05 was significant. RESULTS: 121 patients with Ph-negative ALL were identified (49.6% Ph-negative B-ALL, 24% Ph-like B-ALL, 0.8% B cell lymphoblastic leukemia (LBL), 9.1% T cell ALL, 4.1% T cell LBL, 4.1% early T-cell, 5.8% mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). Median age at diagnosis was 38.5 years and maximum age of patient to receive pegasparagase during induction 1 was 63 years. 71.9% Hispanic, 15.7% white, 9.9% Asian, 2.5% African American. 57.9% males, 42.1% females. 3.4% were favorable, 4.2% intermediate, 54.6% unfavorable and 37.8% unknown by karyotypic risk stratification. Median BMI was 28.9 kg/m 2.54.6% had hepatic steatosis either on history or imaging and 5.1% had CNS disease pre-induction. Post-induction 1, 81.4% of patients achieved CR/CRi and 50% MRD negative. Post induction 2, 82.2% achieved CR/CRi, 67.7% MRD flow negative. Post-consolidation 1, 90.9% were MRD flow negative. 33.1% subsequently received blinatumomab for MRD positive disease, 5% given inotuzumab for relapsed disease, 32.2% underwent allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). Median number of pegasparagase doses received during treatment was 2, rate of relapse and mortality was 27.3% and 13% respectively. Median OS and DFS were not reached but median EFS was 35 months. 3-year OS was 85.3%, when stratified according to MRD post induction 2; 3-year OS was 91.7% for MRD positive patients and 91.2% for MRD negative patients (p=0.55). 3-year DFS was 83.2%; 88.2% for MRD positive patients and 97.4% for MRD negative patients (p=0.22). 3-year EFS was 47.3%; 51.3% for MRD positive patients and 50.6% for MRD negative patients (p=0.49) (Tables 2-3). Use of pegasparagase resulted in grade 3/4 toxicities including hypersensitivity (4.1%), transaminitis (21.5%), pancreatitis (5.4%), hypertriglyceridemia (49.5%), hypofibrinogenemia (45.5%), hyperbilirubinemia (21.5%) and thrombosis (16.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric-based modified USC ALL induction regimen led to a high 3-year OS (85.3%), DFS (83.2%) and EFS (47.3%) with predictable toxicity and compares favorably with original USC ALL regimen, CALGB 10407, GRAALL 2005 and USC/MSKCC regimen. Interestingly, MRD positivity after induction 2 did not adversely affect OS, DFS or EFS, which is likely due to incorporation of blinatumomab and inotuzumab. These agents could have allowed for deeper remissions allowing Ph-negative patients with residual disease to receive allo-HSCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chaudhary: Oncotartis: Consultancy; Pancella: Consultancy; Moderna: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celldex: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; TCR2: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Athelas: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Angeles Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder, Patents & Royalties: Cell therapy . Douer: Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy. Yaghmour: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Superior Outcomes in Hispanic Patients Compared to Non-Hispanic Patients with Ph-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Using the Modified Pediatric-Based University of Southern California Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (USC ALL) Regimen for Newly Diagnosed ALL Patients in the Era of Novel Agents; A Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3361-3361
Author(s):  
Vincent Louie Ramos Mendiola ◽  
Catherine Ly ◽  
Thuy Bui ◽  
Jennifer Wang ◽  
Jack Rodman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
University Of Southern California ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hispanic Patients ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Hispanic patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are historically known to have poor outcomes compared to non-Hispanic patients. Our institution, LAC-USC (LA County Hospital/University of Southern California) has shown a complete remission rate of 96% with use of pegasparagase at 2000 IU/m2 using the USC ALL regimen (based on CCG-1882) for patients aged 17-55 years with a 7-year OS of 51% reported in 2014. The modified USC ALL regimen now uses a single dose of cytarabine rather than fractionated doses and uses a single dose 3g/m 2 methotrexate compared to 1g/m 2 (2.5g/m 2 if T-cell) D1, 15 in original USC ALL regimen to improve compliance, while consolidation was increased to six cycles allowing for PEG holidays to improve toxicity (Table 1). Since our institution takes care of a large population of Hispanic patients with ALL, we now report outcomes in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic patients using the modified USC ALL regimen in the era of novel agents like blinatumomab and inotuzumab. METHODS : This retrospective, single institution chart review included adults >18 years old with newly diagnosed Ph-negative ALL (2016-2020). Primary objectives were 3-year over-all survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives were complete remission/complete remission with incomplete recovery (CR/CRi), minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry, descriptive statistics of patients who were stratified into Hispanic and non-Hispanic cohorts and evaluated using Fisher's exact test. OS, DFS, EFS were reported through Kaplan Meier curves and Log-rank tests. Two-sided p-value ≤0.05 was significant. RESULTS: 121 Ph-negative patients were reviewed. 87 were Hispanic patients (HP) and 34 non Hispanic patients (NHP). Median ages were 39 and 35 years (p=0.51) and median BMI were 29 and 26.9 kg/m 2 (p=0.42), respectively. There were about equal males and females in HP while NHP had 70.6% males compared to 29.4% females (p=0.076). Both HP and NHP were mainly of the Ph-negative ALL subtype, 50.6% vs 47.1%, followed by Ph-like, 25.4% vs 20.6%, respectively (p=0.884). Majority of the population were unfavorable risk by NCCN karyotypic risk stratification, 55.9% in HP compared to 56.0% in NHP (p=0.99). Over-all, no significant difference between baseline characteristics in both cohorts. After induction 1: CR/CRi was 85.9% in HP and 73.4% in NHP (p=0.09). MRD negativity by flow cytometry in HP was 41.4% compared to 26.4% in NHP (p=0.13). After induction 2: 83% of HP were in CR/CRi compared to 80% in NHP (p=0.99) and MRD negativity by flow was 35.6% in HP compared to 32.4% in NHP (p=0.73). Blinatumomab was given in 33.3% of HP and 32.3% of NHP (p=0.92) while only 5.7% of HP and 2.9% of NHP received inotuzumab (p=0.99). 34.5% of HP underwent allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) versus 26.5% in NHP (p=0.40). 3-year OS was 92.2% in HP versus 67.4% in NHP (p=0.004). 3-year DFS was 92.8% in HP versus 60.7% in NHP (p=0.003). 3-year EFS was 54.1% in HP versus 32.3% in NHP (p=0.02) (Table 2). Rate of relapse for HP and NHP were 23.4% vs 29.4% (p=0.74) while rate of mortality for HP and NHP were 7.5% vs 28% (p=0.015), respectively. No clear difference in grade 3/4 PEG toxicities were found in HP and NHP except more hypertriglyceridemia in HP (p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: We present comparison of outcomes in Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients using our modified USC ALL pediatric-based regimen in an era of novel agents. Our data shows significantly better outcomes in Hispanic patients compared to non-Hispanic patients [OS (92.2% vs 67.4%, p=0.004), DFS (92.8% vs 60.7%, p=0.003) and EFS (54.1% vs 32.3%, p=0.02)]. This study demonstrates that given equal access to care (eg. receiving blinatumomab, allo-HSCT), outcomes in HP with Ph-negative ALL are not worse, but rather superior to those in NHP. Utilization of novel immunotherapy like blinatumomab in the salvage setting to achieve deeper molecular response and increased utilization of haploidentical allo-HSCT have likely contributed to reducing ethnic disparities in Hispanic ALL patients. Future studies are needed to validate these findings with larger patient populations. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chaudhary: Oncotartis: Consultancy; Pancella: Consultancy; Moderna: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Celldex: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; TCR2: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Athelas: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Angeles Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder, Patents & Royalties: Cell therapy . Douer: Jazz: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Yaghmour: Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma: a retrospective analysis of a Nationwide database in Japan

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Hisaki Aiba ◽  
Norio Yamamoto ◽  
Katsuhiro Hayashi ◽  
Akihiko Takeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Synovial Sarcoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Wide Resection ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Relapse

Abstract Background Synovial sarcoma is an aggressive but chemosensitive soft-tissue tumor. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma with data from the nationwide database, Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan. Methods This study included 316 patients diagnosed with synovial sarcoma between 2006 and 2012. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a Cox-hazard regression model. Moreover, the effects of perioperative chemotherapy on outcomes were evaluated using a matched-pair analysis. The oncologic outcomes of patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy were compared (cx + and cx-). Results Multivariate analysis revealed significant correlations of age (over 40, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, p = 0.043), margin status (marginal resection, HR = 0.18, p < 0.001 and intralesional resection, HR = 0.30, p = 0.013 versus wide resection) with overall survival; surgical margin type (marginal resection, HR = 0.14, p = 0.001 and intralesional resection, HR = 0.09, p = 0.035 versus wide resection) with local recurrence; and postoperative local recurrence (HR = 0.30, p = 0.027) and surgical margin (marginal resection, HR = 0.31, p = 0.023 versus wide resection) with distant relapse-free survival. Before propensity score matching, perioperative chemotherapy was mainly administered for young patients and patients with deeper tumor locations, larger tumors, more advanced-stage disease, and trunk location. The 3-year overall survival, local control, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 79.8%/89.3% (HR = 0.64, p = 0.114), 89.6%/93.0% (HR = 0.37, p = 0.171) and 71.4%/84.5% (HR = 0.60, p = 0.089) in the cx+/cx- groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 152 patients were selected such that the patient demographics were nearly identical in both groups. The 3-year overall survival, local control, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 71.5%/86.0% (HR = 0.48, p = 0.055), 92.5%/93.3% (HR = 0.51, p = 0.436) and 68.4%/83.9% (HR = 0.47, p = 0.046) in the cx+/cx- groups, respectively. Conclusion This large-sample study indicated that the margin status and postoperative disease control were associated directly or indirectly with improved oncologic outcomes. However, the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for survival outcomes in synovial sarcoma patients was not proven in this Japanese database analysis.

Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Mitomycin, Fluorouracil, and Cytosine Arabinoside Followed by Oral Fluorouracil in Serosa-Negative Gastric Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9206–1

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2282-2287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Nashimoto ◽  
Toshifusa Nakajima ◽  
Hiroshi Furukawa ◽  
Masatsugu Kitamura ◽  
Taira Kinoshita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose: To evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in serosa-negative gastric cancer patients (excluding patients who were T1N0), we conducted a multicenter phase III clinical trial in which 13 cancer centers in Japan participated. Patients and Methods: From January 1993 to December 1994, 252 patients were enrolled into the study and allocated randomly to adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone. The chemotherapy comprised intravenous mitomycin 1.33 mg/m2, fluorouracil (FU) 166.7 mg/m2, and cytarabine 13.3 mg/m2 twice weekly for the first 3 weeks after surgery, and oral FU 134 mg/m2 daily for the next 18 months for a total dose of 67 g/m2. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Overall survival and the site of recurrence were secondary end points. Results: Ninety-eight percent of patients underwent gastrectomy with D2 or greater lymph node dissection. There were no treatment-related deaths and few serious adverse events. There was no significant difference in relapse-free and overall survival between the arms (5-year relapse-free survival 88.8% chemotherapy v 83.7% surgery alone; P = .14 and 5-year survival 91.2% chemotherapy v 86.1% surgery alone; P = .13, respectively). Nine patients (7.1%) in the chemotherapy arm and 17 patients (13.8%) in the surgery-alone arm had cancer recurrence. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant relapse-free or overall survival benefit with this adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with macroscopically serosa-negative gastric cancer after curative resection, and there was no statistical difference between the two arms relating to the types of cancer recurrence. We do not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy with this regimen for this population in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Low value of whole-body dual-modality [18f]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in primary staging of stage I–II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a nest case-control study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bei-Bei Xiao ◽  
Qiu-Yan Chen ◽  
Xue-Song Sun ◽  
Ji-Bin Li ◽  
Dong-hua Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Retropharyngeal Lymph Node ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Pre Treatment

Abstract Objectives The value of using PET/CT for staging of stage I–II NPC remains unclear. Hence, we aimed to investigate the survival benefit of PET/CT for staging of early-stage NPC before radical therapy. Methods A total of 1003 patients with pathologically confirmed NPC of stages I–II were consecutively enrolled. Among them, 218 patients underwent both PET/CT and conventional workup ([CWU], head-and-neck MRI, chest radiograph, liver ultrasound, bone scintigraphy) before treatment. The remaining 785 patients only underwent CWU. The standard of truth (SOT) for lymph node metastasis was defined by the change of size according to follow-up MRI. The diagnostic efficacies were compared in 218 patients who underwent both PET/CT and CWU. After covariate adjustment using propensity scoring, a cohort of 872 patients (218 with and 654 without pre-treatment PET/CT) was included. The primary outcome was overall survival based on intention to treat. Results Retropharyngeal lymph nodes were metastatic based on follow-up MRI in 79 cases. PET/CT was significantly less sensitive than MRI in detecting retropharyngeal lymph node lesions (72.2% [62.3–82.1] vs. 91.1% [84.8–97.4], p = 0.004). Neck lymph nodes were metastatic in 89 cases and PET/CT was more sensitive than MRI (96.6% [92.8–100.0] vs. 76.4% [67.6–85.2], p < 0.001). In the survival analyses, there was no association between pre-treatment PET/CT use and improved overall survival, progression-free survival, local relapse-free survival, regional relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival. Conclusions This study showed PET/CT is of little value for staging of stage I–II NPC patients at initial imaging. Key Points • PET/CT was more sensitive than MRI in detecting neck lymph node lesions whereas it was significantly less sensitive than MRI in detecting retropharyngeal lymph node lesions. • No association existed between pre-treatment PET/CT use and improved survival in stage I–II NPC patients.

Efficacy and prognostic significance of triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin and irinotecan based chemotherapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: An observational multicenter study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15586-e15586
Author(s):  
Mohamed Alghamdi ◽  
Shouki Bazarbashi ◽  
Elsamany Shereef ◽  
Mervat Mahrous ◽  
Omar Al shaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

e15586 Background: In Saudi Arabia, the incidence of colorectal cancer has been increased over the past few years. The optimal treatment beyond the second line is not fully understood. To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and disease outcomes of triflurodine/tipiracil in Saudi patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) has not been studied yet. Our study is a real-life practice evaluation of the efficacy of triflurodine/tipiracil in patients with refractory mCRC. Moreover, the prognosis and the prognostic significance of the different clinical variables have been analyzed. Methods: A retrospective, multi-centers ( 5 centers representative of Saudi Arabia )observational study in patients with mCRC who have received triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin & Irinotecan-based chemotherapy between December 2018-December 2020.We aimed to assess the response to triflurodine/tipiracil, to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS ), the overall survival (OS), and the associated factors of prognostic significance. Results:The data of 100 patients with refractory mCRC who has received triflurodine/tipiracil have been analyzed. The mean age was 55.2 +11.8 years. Forty-two patients were (42%) females and 58 (58%) were male patients. Sigmoid was the most common primary site of cancer in 35 (35%) patients, followed by rectum 29 (29%). Peritoneal metastasis was present in 17 (23.3%) patients ,liver in 51(56.6%) and lung in 39 (50.7%). Metastatic sites were ≥ 2 in 45 (45%) patients. Metastatic lesions were ≥ 5 in 65 (65%) patients. Xelox chemotherapy regimen was the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy which represents 43%, while Folfiri or Xeliri combination was the most used second line in 57 (60%). For the third line, Folfox or Xelox was used in 81 (83.5%) patients. The fourth line was given to 49 (67.1%). For first-line biological agents, Cetuximab was used most frequently 31 (46.3%).Evaluation of the response to treatment with triflurodine/tipiracil revealed one patient (1%) with a complete response,3 patients (3%) with partial response, 28 (28%) patients with stable disease, and 66 (66%) showed progressive disease. The estimated median progression-free survival was 5 months ( 3.839 - 6.161) and the median overall survival was 12 months (9.732-14.268). The log-rank analysis showed that the baseline neutrophils ≤ 75 % ( P-value= 0.0092) and low hemoglobin level (P-value= 0.0245) were strongly associated with a higher survival. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, the neutrophil count ≤ 75 % was the only independent predictor for survival. Conclusions: Trifluridine/tipiracil is effective in patients with refractory mCRC. The low neutrophil count might predict a better overall survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document