Role of urine immunofixation in the complete response assessment of MM patients other than light-chain-only disease

Abstract Response criteria for multiple myeloma (MM) require monoclonal protein (M-protein)–negative status on both serum immunofixation electrophoresis (sIFE) and urine (uIFE) immunofixation electrophoresis for classification of complete response (CR). However, uIFE is not always performed for sIFE-negative patients. We analyzed M-protein evaluations from 384 MM patients (excluding those with light-chain-only disease) treated in the GEM2012MENOS65 (NCT01916252) trial to determine the uIFE-positive rate in patients who became sIFE-negative posttreatment and evaluate rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative status and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients achieving CR, CR but without uIFE available (uncertain CR; uCR), or very good partial response (VGPR). Among 107 patients with M-protein exclusively in serum at diagnosis who became sIFE-negative posttreatment and who had uIFE available, the uIFE-positive rate was 0%. Among 161 patients with M-protein in both serum and urine at diagnosis who became sIFE-negative posttreatment, 3 (1.8%) were uIFE positive. Among patients achieving CR vs uCR, there were no significant differences in postconsolidation MRD-negative (<10−6; 76% vs 75%; P = .9) and 2-year PFS (85% vs 88%; P = .4) rates; rates were significantly lower among patients achieving VGPR. Our results suggest that uIFE is not necessary for defining CR in MM patients other than those with light-chain-only disease.

Download Full-text

Impact of Normalized Free Light Chain Ratio for Assessment of Monoclonal Protein in Patients with Light Chain Only and Oligosecretory Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2074.2074 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2074-2074

Author(s):

Kentaro Narita ◽

Yoshiaki Usui ◽

Yoshiaki Abe ◽

Masami Takeuchi ◽

Kosei Matsue

Keyword(s):

Light Chain ◽

Urine Analysis ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Protein Electrophoresis ◽

Free Light Chain ◽

Reference Ranges ◽

Immunofixation Electrophoresis ◽

The Impact ◽

Monoclonal Component

Abstract Background: Monitoring of serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio after treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) patients is valuable for assessing monoclonal component of free light chain (FLC). However, the recent International Myeloma Working Group guidelines did not recommend replacing 24-hour urine analysis with FLC analysis in diagnosis or response assessment of MM, and previous studies indicated discordance between urine analysis and sFLC levels in light chain-only MM (LCMM). This is clinically relevant because sFLC normalization was considered a surrogate for improved outcome in both LCMM and intact immunoglobulin MM (IIMM). The clinical impact of FLC ratio normalization on detection of monoclonal component may differ between LCMM or oligosecretory myeloma (OSMM) and IIMM. This study explored the utility of sFLC ratio as a surrogate for residual clonal monoclonal component compared with 24-hour urine immunofixation electrophoresis (uIFx) after treatment. We evaluated the impact of normalization of sFLC ratio in patients with LCMM/OSMM that obtained very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), and immunophenotypic CR (iCR; sIFx/uIF negative plus ≤ 10-4 clonal PCs) determined by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC). Methods: We included 176 patients (51 with LCMM and OSMM, 125 with IIMM) treated between April 2006 and January 2016 at Kameda Medical Center, Japan. Immunoglobulin levels in serum and urine samples were examined by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), serum immunofixation electrophoresis (sIFx), urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP), uIFx, and sFLC for response assessment. Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessments after treatment were performed by 6-color MFC and the results were compared to other tests of monoclonal components, including SPEP, UPEP, sIFx, uIFx, and FLC. Agreement between sFLC normalization and MRD by MFC was assessed using kappa statistic. Disease response was evaluated using IMWG criteria. sFLC was measured by Fleelite® assay (The Binding Site Group Ltd.). Reference ranges for sFLC have been previously published. Statistical analyses were performed with EZR, which is a graphical user interface for R ver. 3.2.1. Ethical considerations: This study was approved by the local ethics committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. Results: All of 51 LCMM/OSMM patients (100%) and 95 of the 125 IIMM patients (72%) had measurable and abnormal involved sFLC (≥ 100 mg/L) and positive uIFx at presentation. VGPR, CR, and iCR were obtained in 31 (61%), 25 (49%), and 14 (27%) patients with LCMM/OSMM, respectively, and normalization of sFLC ratio at VGPR, CR and iCR was seen in 1/31 (3%), 13/25 (48%), and 8/14 (57%) of these patients, respectively. Among the LCMM/OSMM patients with iCR, 4 patients obtained deeper iCR (≤ 10-5 clonal PCs) and all of them had normal sFLC ratio, while sFLC ratio remained abnormal in the rest of 10 iCR patients that did not achieve deeper iCR. In IIMM patients, VGPR, CR, and iCR were obtained in 78 (61%), 52 (42%), and 20 (16%) patients, respectively. In contrast to the LCMM/OSMM patients, normalization of the sFLC ratio at VGPR, CR, and iCR was seen in 52/78 (67%), 39/52 (75%), and 17/20 (85%) of IIMM patients, respectively. Thirteen of the 14 IIMM patients (93%) that obtained deeper iCR had normal sFLC ratio. Among the patients with IIMM, percentage of patients with normalized sFLC ratio did not differ between the response groups (p=0.11), while it was significantly different in LCMM/OSMM patients (p<0.001) (Figure 1). These observations indicated that the normalization of sFLC ratio is significantly associated with deeper response in LCMM/OSMM patients, but not in IIMM patients. Conclusions: Our observations indicated that sFLC test has greater sensitivity than urine immunofixation for detection of the monoclonal component of sFLC, especially in patients with LCMM/OSMM. In addition, we also showed that normalization of sFLC ratio is correlated with the depth of response assessed by MFC in patients with LCMM/OSMM, but not in IIMM patients. These findings suggest that FLC ratio provides greater sensitivity for residual disease monitoring than uPEP or uIFx in patients with LCMM and OSMM, and therefore could be considered as an alternative to urine analysis for monitoring of LCMM/OSMM patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

The Relationship Between Serum Free Light Chain Levels and Serum Immunofixation Electrophoresis: Implications for the Definition of “Stringent CR” in Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.2724.2724 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 2724-2724 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

S. Allen ◽

E. Vickrey ◽

J. Mehta ◽

S. Singhal

Keyword(s):

Light Chain ◽

Residual Disease ◽

M Protein ◽

Serum Free ◽

Serum Free Light Chain ◽

Immunofixation Electrophoresis ◽

The Relationship ◽

Abnormal Ratio ◽

New Criteria ◽

Rule Out

Abstract The serum free light chain (SFLC) assay enables detection of an abnormal protein in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias who secrete no or small quantities of monoclonal protein in the serum. Thus, the SFLC ratio may be abnormal (normal range; 0.26–1.65) in patients who have no M protein on serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE). However, the relationship between the SFLC ratio and abnormal SIFE in patients who do secrete detectable M protein has not been studied. The new international response criteria for myeloma define an entity called stringent complete remission (CR) based on negative SIFE and normal SFLC ratio (with absent clonal plasmacytosis). “CR” is distinguished from “stringent CR” by lack of requirement of normal SFLC ratio in these new criteria. The old criteria did not use SFLC. The new criteria have not been validated prospectively whereas the old criteria have been used in multiple clinical trials. The obvious implication of using normalization of SFLC ratio to define “stringent CR” is that the SFLC ratio is the most sensitive indicator of residual disease. Thus, one would expect to see abnormal SFLC ratio when SIFE is normal but not vice versa. We explored the relationship between SIFE and SFLC ratio in 122 patients with secretory IgG or IgA myeloma. 2648 samples through the continuum of therapy that fulfilled the following criteria were studied: availability of concomitant SFLC and SIFE, and lack of oligoclonal bands on SIFE and UIFE. SIFE showed the original M protein in 2342 samples (88%). SFLC ratio was normal (0.26–1.65) in 1012 (38%). The abnormal ratio was concordant in 1536 and discordant in 100. SFLC ratios were considered concordant if <0.26 for lambda disease and >1.65 for kappa disease, and discordant if <0.26 for kappa disease and >1.65 for lambda disease. Discordant ratios were grouped with normal because they did not reflect an excess of the abnormal light chain associated with the original M protein. If the 95% CI values for SFLC ratio were used (0.3–1.2), 810 (31%) results were normal. With the 95% CI values, the abnormal ratio was concordant in 1702 and discordant in 136. The SFLC ratio was normal in 34% of cases with positive SIFE and abnormal in 66%. On the contrary, the SFLC ratio was normal in 69% of cases with negative SIFE and abnormal in 31%. As the table below shows, the proportion of cases with positive SIFE and normal SFLC ratio was much higher than those with an abnormal SFLC ratio and negative SIFE. SIFE SFLC ratio SFLC ratio Normal Abnormal Normal or discordant abnormal Concordant abnormal Positive 802 (30%) 1540 (58%) 874 (33%) 1468 (55%) Negative 210 (8%) 96 (4%) 238 (9%) 68 (3%) SIFE is currently considered to be the standard indicator of the presence of an M protein. When evaluated against that, the sensitivity of SFLC is 66% and its specificity is 69%. The sensitivity drops to 63% but specificity improves to 77% if discordant abnormal ratios are considered normal. What if either positive SIFE or a concordant abnormal SFLC ratio were considered to indicate residual disease (2410; 91%) and a negative SIFE as well as a normal or discordant abnormal SFLC ratio were required to rule out residual M protein (238; 9%)? In this case, the sensitivity of SIFE is 97% and that of an abnormal concordant SFLC ratio 62%. The assumptions do not allow calculation of specificity. Our data indicate that a normal SFLC ratio cannot rule out the presence of residual disease as conventionally defined by a positive SIFE, and that a normal SFLC ratio is significantly more likely to be seen in the presence of a positive SIFE than is a negative SIFE in the presence of an abnormal SFLC ratio. Additional prospective work is required before SFLC estimation and ratio can be incorporated into assessment of response in myeloma, and to see if the “stringent CR” entity truly defines a more robust disease response than “non-stringent CR.”

Download Full-text

Monitoring the M-protein of multiple myeloma patients treated with a combination of monoclonal antibodies: the laboratory solution to eliminate interference

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) ◽

10.1515/cclm-2021-0399 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 0 (0) ◽

Author(s):

Somayya Noori ◽

Christie P. M. Verkleij ◽

Marina Zajec ◽

Pieter Langerhorst ◽

Patricia W. C. Bosman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Response Assessment ◽

M Protein ◽

Single Patient ◽

Additional Advantage ◽

Quantitative Monitoring ◽

Immunofixation Electrophoresis ◽

Protein Diagnostics ◽

Minimal Residual

Abstract Objectives The therapeutic monoclonal antibody (t-mAb) daratumumab, used to treat multiple myeloma (MM) patients, interferes with routine, electrophoretic based M-protein diagnostics. Electrophoretic response assessment becomes increasingly difficult when multiple t-mAbs are combined for use in a single patient. This is the first study to address the analytical challenges of M-protein monitoring when multiple t-mAbs are combined. Methods In this proof-of-principle study we evaluate two different methods to monitor M-protein responses in three MM patients, who receive both daratumumab and nivolumab. The double hydrashift assay aims to resolve t-mAb interference on immunofixation. The MS-MRD (mass spectrometry minimal residual disease) assay measures clonotypic peptides to quantitate both M-protein and t-mAb concentrations. Results After exposure to daratumumab and nivolumab, both t-mAbs become visible on immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) as two IgG-kappa bands that migrate close to each other at the cathodal end of the γ-region. In case the M-protein co-migrates with these t-mAbs, the observed interference was completely abolished with the double IFE hydrashift assay. In all three patients the MS-MRD assay was also able to distinguish the M-protein from the t-mAbs. Additional advantage of the MS-MRD assay is that this multiplex assay is more sensitive and allows quantitative M-protein-, daratumumab- and nivolumab-monitoring. Conclusions Daratumumab and nivolumab interfere with electrophoretic M-protein diagnostics. However, the M-protein can be distinguished from both t-mAbs by use of a double hydrashift assay. The MS-MRD assay provides an alternative method that allows sensitive and simultaneous quantitative monitoring of both the M-protein and t-mAbs.

Download Full-text

Obinutuzumab short-duration infusion (SDI) in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: Results from the end of induction analysis of the phase IV GAZELLE study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.7545 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 7545-7545

Author(s):

Miguel Angel A. Canales Albendea ◽

Thomas A. Buchholz ◽

Koji Izutsu ◽

Takayuki Ishikawa ◽

Laura Maria Fogliatto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Complete Response ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Open Label ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

To Receive ◽

Phase Iv

7545 Background: Obinutuzumab (G)-chemotherapy (chemo) has demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with rituximab (R)-chemo in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). G is currently administered by IV infusion over ̃3–4 hours. A shorter duration of infusion in Cycle (C) 2 and subsequent cycles, as is standard practice with R, could improve convenience for patients (pts) and efficiency for infusion facilities. We report the primary analysis of the prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase IV, GAZELLE study (NCT03817853), which evaluated the safety of G administered as a 90-minute (min) SDI from C2 onwards in pts with FL. Methods: Pts with previously untreated FL received G (1000mg) intravenously on Day (D) 1, 8, and 15 of C1, and on D1 thereafter, plus chemo (bendamustine, CHOP, or CVP) for 6–8 cycles. In C1, pts received G at the standard infusion rate. Pts without a Grade (Gr) ≥3 infusion-related reaction (IRR) in C1 were eligible to receive G as a 90-min SDI from C2. Pts with a Gr 3 IRR in C1 received the standard G infusion in C2, and were eligible for G SDI in subsequent cycles if no Gr ≥3 IRRs occurred. Pts with a second Gr 3/4 IRR discontinued G. At the end of induction (EOI), responding pts received maintenance G (1000mg) as SDI for 2 years or until disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was incidence of Gr ≥3 IRRs during C2. IRRs were defined as any event occurring ≤24 hours from infusion judged to be related to treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and investigator-assessed overall response rate at EOI. Results: As of December 3, 2020, 113 pts had received study treatment. Median age was 62.0 years, 50.4% were male, 61.9% had stage IV FL, and 45.1% were classified as high-risk FLIPI. Of the 110 pts who were eligible for G SDI from C2, no pt experienced a Gr ≥3 IRR with SDI in C2 (Table). One pt experienced a Gr 3 IRR with SDI in C5, presenting hypertension. All other IRRs with SDI were Gr 1/2. No Gr 4/5 IRRs were reported. Other AEs were similar to those observed in previous studies. At the clinical cut-off date, 104 pts had a CT imaging-based response assessment at EOI and 9 pts had no response assessment; 76/113 (67.3%) had a complete response, 22 (19.5%) had a partial response, and six (5.8%) had PD. Conclusions: In GAZELLE, G SDI in C2 and beyond appeared to be safe. No Gr 3 IRRs were observed in C2 and only one Gr 3 IRR was reported in subsequent cycles. The safety profile of G SDI was comparable with the established profile of G in advanced FL. Clinical trial information: NCT03817853. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Daratumumab (DARA) maintenance or observation (OBS) after treatment with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTd) with or without DARA and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): CASSIOPEIA Part 2.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.8004 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 8004-8004

Author(s):

Philippe Moreau ◽

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Keyword(s):

Interim Analysis ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Second Primary ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Open Label ◽

Depth Of Response

8004 Background: D-VTd plus ASCT was approved for transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM based on part 1 of CASSIOPEIA. We report a prespecified interim analysis of CASSIOPEIA part 2: DARA maintenance vs OBS in pts with ≥partial response (PR) in part 1, regardless of induction/consolidation (ind/cons) treatment. Methods: CASSIOPEIA is a 2-part, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study in TE NDMM. Pts received 4 cycles ind and 2 cycles cons with D-VTd or VTd. 886 pts who achieved ≥PR were rerandomized to DARA 16 mg/kg IV Q8W for up to 2 yr (n = 442) or OBS (n = 444) until progressive disease per IMWG. Pts were stratified by ind (D-VTd vs VTd) and depth of response (minimum residual disease [MRD] status and post cons response ≥PR). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after second randomization. This interim analysis assessed efficacy and safety after 281 PFS events. A preplanned hierarchical procedure tested key secondary endpoints: time to progression (TTP), ≥complete response (CR), MRD negativity rates by NGS and overall survival (OS). Results: At median follow-up of 35.4 mo, median PFS was not reached (NR) with DARA and 46.7 mo with OBS (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.42–0.68; P <0.0001). PFS advantage for DARA was consistent across most subgroups. However, a prespecified analysis showed significant interaction with ind/cons treatment arm ( P< 0.0001). PFS HR for DARA vs OBS was 0.32 (95% CI 0.23–0.46) in the VTd arm and 1.02 (0.71–1.47) in the D-VTd arm. Median TTP was NR for DARA vs 46.7 mo for OBS (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.38–0.62; P <0.0001). More pts in the DARA vs OBS arm achieved ≥CR (72.9% vs 60.8%; OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.54–3.07; P <0.0001). MRD negativity (in ≥CR pts at 10-5) was 58.6% with DARA vs 47.1% with OBS (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.33–2.43; P= 0.0001). Median OS was NR in either arm. Most common (≥2.5%) grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) with DARA vs OBS were pneumonia (2.5% vs 1.4%), lymphopenia (3.6% vs 1.8%), and hypertension (3.0% vs 1.6%). Serious AEs occurred in 22.7% (DARA) vs 18.9% (OBS) of pts; the most common (≥2.5%) was pneumonia (2.5% vs 1.6%). 13 (3.0%) pts discontinued DARA due to an AE. The rate of infusion-related reactions was 54.5% (DARA-naïve pts) and 2.2% (prior DARA pts); 90% were grade 1/2.Second primary malignancies occurred in 5.5% (DARA) vs 2.7% (OBS) of pts. Conclusions: CASSIOPEIA part 2 demonstrated a clinical benefit of DARA maintenance in TE NDMM pts, with significantly longer PFS for DARA vs OBS. With current follow-up, maintenance PFS benefit appeared only in pts treated with VTd as ind/cons. Pts who received D-VTd ind/cons with or without DARA maintenance achieved similar PFS; longer follow-up is needed for PFS2 and OS. DARA significantly increased deeper response and MRD negativity rates vs OBS, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT02541383.

Download Full-text

MASS-FIX versus standard methods to predict for PFS and OS among multiple myeloma patients participating on the STAMINA trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.8009 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 8009-8009

Author(s):

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Amrita Y. Krishnan ◽

Bonnie Arendt ◽

Surendra Dasari ◽

Yvonne Adeduni Efebera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mass Spectrometry ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Flow Cytometry ◽

Multiple Testing ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Independent Effect ◽

Next Generation ◽

Different Response

8009 Background: Measuring response among patients with multiple myeloma is essential for the care of patients. Deeper responses have been associated with better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Serum (SIFE) and urine immunofixation are the currently used markers for biochemical documentation of CR after which marrow is tested for plasma cell clearance. Next generation flow cytometry and sequencing are used to document the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD). Mass spectrometry of blood by MALDI (Mass-Fix) is a new simple, inexpensive, sensitive, and specific means of detecting monoclonal immunoglobulins. To better test the hypothesis that Mass-Fix is superior to existing methodologies to predict for survival outcomes—especially SIFE-- samples from the STAMINA trial (NCT01109004), a trial comparing 3 transplant approaches among patients who have already received induction, were employed. Methods: Five-hundred and seventy-five patients were included. Samples from enrollment post-induction (post-I) and 1-year post enrollment (1YR) were tested when available. Four response parameters were assessed univariately: Mass-Fix, SIFE, complete response, and MRD by next generation flow cytometry. Mass spectrometry spectra were evaluated in a blinded fashion. Complete response was according to the 2006 International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models using stepwise regression were developed to explore the independent effect of the different response parameters on PFS and OS and interactions with other risk factors. Results: Of the 4 response measures, only MRD and Mass-Fix predicted for PFS and OS at multiple testing points on multivariate analyses (Table). Of the 4 post-I measurements, only MRD predicted for PFS; however, Mass-Fix was the only post-I measurement to predict for OS. Of all the 1-year measures, both 1YR Mass-Fix and 1YR MRD positivity predicted for inferior PFS and OS. In models including MRD and Mass-Fix, SIFE and CR were not prognostic for PFS or OS. Conclusions: Mass-Fix is a powerful means to track monoclonal proteins. The full utility of Mass-Fix was not exploited given the absence of a diagnostic sample and the fact that only serum (and not urine) was tested. Despite these limitations, it performed well at pre-induction and at 1 year. Mass-Fix provides a convenient and non-invasive means of predicting for myeloma outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT01109004. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Consolidation and Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.21.01045 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. JCO.21.01045

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Meral Beksac ◽

Bronno van der Holt ◽

Sara Aquino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Primary Study ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Consolidation Treatment ◽

Minimal Residual

PURPOSE To address the role of consolidation treatment for newly diagnosed, transplant eligible patients with multiple myeloma in a controlled clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS The EMN02/HOVON95 trial compared consolidation treatment with two cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) or no consolidation after induction and intensification therapy, followed by continuous lenalidomide maintenance. Primary study end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Eight hundred seventy-eight eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive VRD consolidation (451 patients) or no consolidation (427 patients). At a median follow-up of 74.8 months, median PFS with adjustment for pretreatment was prolonged in patients randomly assigned to VRD consolidation (59.3 v 42.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.96; P = .016). The PFS benefit was observed across most predefined subgroups, including revised International Staging System (ISS) stage, cytogenetics, and prior treatment. Revised ISS3 stage (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.86) and ampl1q (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.04) were significant adverse prognostic factors. The median duration of maintenance was 33 months (interquartile range 13-86 months). Response ≥ complete response (CR) after consolidation versus no consolidation before start of maintenance was 34% versus 18%, respectively ( P < .001). Response ≥ CR on protocol including maintenance was 59% with consolidation and 46% without ( P < .001). Minimal residual disease analysis by flow cytometry in a subgroup of 226 patients with CR or stringent complete response or very good partial response before start of maintenance demonstrated a 74% minimal residual disease–negativity rate in VRD-treated patients. Toxicity from VRD was acceptable and manageable. CONCLUSION Consolidation treatment with VRD followed by lenalidomide maintenance improves PFS and depth of response in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma as compared to maintenance alone.

Download Full-text

NIMG-54. RADIOMIC FEATURES FROM LESION HABITAT PREDICT RESPONSE TO COMBINATION OF NIVOLUMAB AND BEVACIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: A FEASIBILITY STUDY

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noab196.552 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽

pp. vi141-vi141

Author(s):

Ruchika Verma ◽

Yasmeen Rauf ◽

Ipsa Yadav ◽

Volodymyr Statsevych ◽

Jonathan Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Progression Free Survival ◽

Poor Response ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Complete Response ◽

Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽

Proportional Hazard ◽

Free Survival ◽

Cox Proportional Hazard ◽

Expert Radiologist ◽

Mri Scans

Abstract PURPOSE The use of immunotherapy in glioblastoma management is under active investigation. Glioblastomas are “cold” tumors, meaning that they have inactivated or fewer tumor infiltrative lymphocytes in addition to substantial tumor necrosis, attributing to their poor response to immunotherapy. A significant challenge is the apriori identification of Glioblastoma patients who will respond favorably to immunotherapy. In this work, we evaluated the ability of computerized MRI-based quantitative features (radiomics) extracted from the lesion habitat (including enhancing lesion, necrosis, and peritumoral hyperintensities) to predict response and progression-free survival (PFS) in recurrent GBM patients treated with combination of Nivolumab and Bevacizumab. METHODS Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology (iRANO) criteria along with PFS were used to analyze n=50 patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial where patients received Nivolumab with either standard or low dose Bevacizumab. These patients were assessed to see if they had complete response, partial response, stable disease (i.e. responders, n=31), or disease progression (i.e. non-responders, n=19). Lesion habitat constituting necrotic core, enhancing tumor, and edema were delineated by expert radiologist on Gd-T1w, T2w and FLAIR MRI scans. COLIAGE radiomic features from each of the delineated regions were selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) via cross-validation, to segregate non-responder patients from responders. A multivariable cox proportional hazard model was used to predict survival (PFS). RESULTS CoLlAGe correlation, sum average, and sum variance features (capture local heterogeneity) from the lesion habitat, were found to segregate non-responder patients from responders with an accuracy of 86%, followed by 80% using features from peritumoral hyperintensities and 78% from enhancing tumor. In our survival analysis, C-index of 0.688 was obtained using features from the entire lesion habitat, followed by peritumoral hyperintensities (0.675) and enhancing tumor (0.656). CONCLUSION Radiomic features from the lesion habitat may predict response to combination of Nivolumab and Bevacizumab in recurrent Glioblastomas.

Download Full-text

Limited benefit of additional contrast-enhanced CT to end-of-treatment PET/CT evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-98081-x ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Gaetano Paone ◽

Mariana Raditchkova-Sarnelli ◽

Teresa Ruberto-Macchi ◽

Marco Cuzzocrea ◽

Emanuele Zucca ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Metabolic Response ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Complete Response ◽

Moderate Increase ◽

Comparable Rate ◽

Contrast Enhanced Ct ◽

End Of Treatment ◽

Pet Ct

AbstractDespite follicular lymphoma (FL) is frequently characterized by a moderate increase of glucose metabolism, PET/CT examinations provides valuable information for staging and response assessment of the disease. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT, respectively, in evaluating FL patients at the end of treatment. Fifty FL consecutive patients who underwent end-of-therapy PET/CT with both ldCT and ceCT were analyzed. Two blinded observers independently assessed PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT applying the Deauville score (DS) and Lugano classification criteria. PET imaging obtained after the end-of-treatment (EoT) was classified as showing PET and ce-CT matched response (concordant imaging group, CIG) or PET and ce-CT unmatched response (discordant imaging group, DIG). Relapse rate and Event-Free Survival (EFS) were compared between CIG and DIG patients. Overall, no differences in metabolic response classification were observed between PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT. In 13 (26%) patients PET/ceCT identified additional FDG-negative nodal lesions in mesenteric, retroperitoneal and iliac regions. However, in all cases, final DS remained unchanged and the additional results did not modify the following therapeutic decision. Among patients, who obtained complete metabolic response a comparable rate of relapse was registered in DIG 3/13 (23%) and CIG subgroups 5/20 (25%) [p = 0.899]. In all 3 DIG cohort patients who relapsed the recurrent disease involved also, but not exclusively, PET negative lymph nodes detected by ceCT. In overall population metabolic response defined by PET/ldCT predicted EFS [76% (group of patients with metabolic response) vs 35% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.0013] significantly better than ceCT-Based response assessment [75% (group of patients with complete response) vs 53% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.06]. Our study demonstrates a negligible diagnostic and predictive value of ceCT performed in addition to standard 18FDG PET/ldCT for EoT response evaluation in FLs. PET/ldCT should be performed as first-line imaging procedure, also in patients with prevalent abdominal and pelvic involvement, limiting the acquisition of ceCT in selected cases. This tailored approach would contribute to avoid useless radiation exposure and preserve renal function of patients.

Download Full-text

Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in east Asian patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e20015 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e20015-e20015

Author(s):

Kihyun Kim ◽

Chang Ki Min ◽

Youngil Koh ◽

Kenichi Ishizawa ◽

Sung-Hyun Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Residual Disease ◽

East Asian ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Asian Patients ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

East Asian Patients

e20015 Background: The Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated that isatuximab (Isa) plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with Kd in patients (pts) with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 99% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.89; P= 0.0007). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd in the East Asian patients (19 Japanese, 27 Korean). Methods: RMM pts who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy were stratified to receive Isa-Kd or Kd. Isa-Kd arm received Isa (10 mg/kg intravenously) weekly for 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks. Both arms received K (20 mg/m2 days 1-2, 56 mg/m2 thereafter) twice-weekly for 3 of 4 weeks, and d (20 mg) twice-weekly. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events (AE). The primary endpoint was prolongation of PFS. Key secondary endpoints included; very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), complete response (CR) rate and minimal residual disease negativity (MRD–) rate. Results: East Asian pts (25 Isa-Kd, 21 Kd) were randomized. Pt characteristics were similar in the East Asian subgroup compared with the intent to treat (ITT) population (N = 302). Median age (Isa-Kd 64.0 [range 45–83] years vs Kd 60.0 [range 33–73] years); median prior lines Isa-Kd 2.0 (range 1–3) vs Kd 1.0 (range 1–3); refractory to lenalidomide 16.0% Isa-Kd vs 47.6% Kd; refractory to PI 20.0% Isa-Kd vs 33.3% Kd; high-risk cytogenetics 48.0% Isa-Kd vs 42.9% Kd. After a median follow-up of 20.7 months, the addition of Isa to Kd improved ≥VGPR, CR and MRD– rates (Table). The HR 0.64 (95%CI: 0.231-1.764) for disease progression or death favored Isa-Kd. Grade ≥3 AEs were observed in 79.2% Isa-Kd vs 55.0% Kd pts, serious TEAEs in 45.8% Isa-Kd vs 50.0% Kd; TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were lower in the Isa-Kd group (4.2% Isa-Kd vs 10.0% Kd). Overall, 64.0% Isa-Kd vs 42.9% Kd pts were still receiving treatment. Conclusions: Efficacy and safety results of Isa-Kd in East Asian pts are consistent with the results of the overall IKEMA population, in which significantly better efficacy (PFS, CR, ≥VGPR and MRD– rate) was reported in favor of Isa-Kd without an increase in the number of patients with serious TEAEs or discontinuations. Isa-Kd is a potential treatment option for East Asian pts with RMM. Clinical trial information: NCT03275285. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text