Prognostic Value of Tumor-Infiltrating TIA-1+ Cytotoxic T Cells (TIA1-CTCs) and FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells (Tregs) in Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) Following Solid Organ Transplant (SOT).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 54-54
Author(s):  
Raymond E. Tsao ◽  
Bill Richendollar ◽  
Tony Jin ◽  
Eric Hsi ◽  
Brad Pohlman
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cells ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Solid Organ

Abstract Background: PTLD is a rare, often fatal, complication of SOT. Several studies have identified clinical prognostic factors in PTLD. However, no published studies to our knowledge have yet correlated outcome with the number (#) or type of tumor infiltrating T-cells, which in other types of lymphoma may have prognostic value. We hypothesized that tumor infiltrating T-cells, including TIA1-CTCs and Tregs, would predict survival in SOT PTLD. Methods: We searched the Cleveland Clinic pathology archives for SOT patients (pts), who were diagnosed with PTLD between 1987 and 2007; reviewed the medical records and extracted clinical information and outcomes; performed immunohistochemical (IHC) studies for CD3, TIA-1, and FOXP3; and analyzed the data by Cox proportional univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: We identified 62 SOT pts (heart, 22; lung, 17; kidney 15; liver, 7; pancreas, 1), who were diagnosed with PTLD at median age of 51 years (range 7–73). The median time from SOT to PTLD was 1.8 years (range 0.2–20.9). 1st therapeutic intervention (1st TI) (usually >1) included “complete” resection (4), decreased immunosuppression (51), acyclovir or gancyclovir (32), rituximab (R) (18), “CHOP” chemotherapy (11), radiation therapy (7), and interferon (4). Response to 1st TI was CR (34) or PR (10). The median follow-up among surviving pts is 3.6 years (range 0.1–11.7). 35 (including 4 CHOP and 9 R) pts have died; only 2 CHOP but all 9 R pts died from PTLD. IHC studies in 42 evaluable cases showed the following median # (and range) of cells /10 hpf: CD3 525 (8–2451), TIA1-CTCs 304 (6–1238) and FOXP3 13 (1–338). On univariate analysis, younger age, prior rejection episodes <2, PS <2, LDH normal, extranodal sites (ENS) <2, IPI <4, 1st TI >1, 1st TI with CHOP, # of CD3 cells >550/10 hpf, and # of TIA1-CTCs >300/10 hpf were associated with an improved overall survival (OS), PTLD-specific survival (PSS), and/or progression-free survival (PFS). On multivariate analyses, only PS <2, ENS <2, and 1st TI with CHOP remained independent predictors of outcome. Among the subset of 47 pts with monomorphic B-cell (MMBC) PTLD, these same clinical factors were also independently statistically significant. Conclusions: High #s of infiltrating T cells and TIA1-CTCs are associated with a favorable outcome and may reflect a relatively intact local anti-tumor response. Tregs, which may potentially antagonize such a response, are uniformly low and do not correlate with outcome in PTLD. In this analysis, a significant minority of SOT pts treated initially with single agent R still died from PTLD while pts treated initially with CHOP (with or without R) appeared to have a better outcome, arguing for its early use - at least in a subset of pts. Future studies should attempt to identify biological factors that predict which MMBC PTLD pts might benefit from the addition of CHOP to standard R as part of 1st TI.

Is rituximab (R) the optimal therapeutic intervention (TI) for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) following solid organ transplant (SOT)?

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8074-8074
Author(s):  
R. E. Tsao ◽  
T. Jin ◽  
B. Richendollar ◽  
E. Hsi ◽  
B. Pohlman
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Initial Study ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Study Results

8074 Background: PTLD is a rare, often fatal, complication of SOT. Most are derived from CD20+ B-cells. Historically, patients (pts) received a variety of TIs ranging from decreased immunosuppression to chemotherapy (CT). Based on promising initial study results, most pts now receive rituximab (R) without CT as part of 1st TI. Methods: We searched the Cleveland Clinic pathology archives for SOT pts, who were diagnosed with PTLD between 1987 and 2006; reviewed the medical records; extracted clinical information and outcomes; and analyzed the data by Cox proportional univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: We identified 55 SOT pts (heart, 18; lung, 16; kidney 14; liver, 6; pancreas, 1), who were diagnosed with PTLD at median age 47 years (range 7–66). The median time from SOT to PTLD was 1.7 years (range .2–20.9). 1st TI (usually >1) included “complete” resection (4), decreased immunosuppresion (53), acyclovir or ganciclovir (28), interferon (4), radiation therapy (6), CT (12), and/or R (17). Response to 1st TI was CR (30) or PR (10). The median follow-up among surviving pts is 5.0 years (range .1–11.4). 29 (including 5 CT and 5 R) pts have died; only 2 CT but all 5 R pts died from PTLD. On univariate analysis, younger age+, <2 prior rejection episodes+*, PS <2+*, normal LDH+*, <2 extranodal sites+, lower IPI+*, >1 1st TI+, and 1st TI with CT* were associated with an improved overall survival (OS)+ and/or PTLD-specific survival (PSS)*. On multivariate analysis, only PS <2 (HR 0.04 [CI 0.01–0.14], p<0.001) and >1 1st TI (HR 0.43 [CI 0.19–0.97], p=0.041) were associated with improved OS while PS <2 (HR 0.04 [0.01- 0.16], p<0.001) and 1st TI with CT (HR 0.19 [CI 0.04–0.84], p<0.028) were associated with improved PSS. Conclusions: A significant minority of SOT pts that receive R without CT as part of 1st TI still die from PTLD. PS is the most important predictor of outcome. In conjunction with the improved survival observed in de novo B-cell NHL pts treated with R+CT (compared to CT alone), this retrospective analysis suggests that some SOT PTLD pts should receive R+CT as part of 1st TI. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prognostic value of peripheral naive CD8+ T cells in oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Zhenlin Gao ◽  
Yaguang Han
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of peripheral naive and memory CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and other immune cells in patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A total of 142 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC treated with RT were enrolled, and their blood samples were collected within 3 days before RT. Immune cells were identified by flow cytometry. Results: Patients with high levels of naive CD8+ T cells had longer overall survival (p = 0.004) and progression-free survival (p = 0.001) than those with low levels of naive CD8+ T cells. Multivariate analyses revealed that naive CD8+ T cells were independently correlated with overall survival (p = 0.019) and progression-free survival (p = 0.024). Conclusion: The results suggest that peripheral naive CD8+ T cells may be an independent prognostic indicator for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC undergoing RT.

scholarly journals 550 ARTACUS: An open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study of RP1 in solid organ transplant recipients with advanced cutaneous malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A580-A580
Author(s):  
Jason Luke ◽  
Michael Migden ◽  
Wanxing Chai-Ho ◽  
Diana Bolotin ◽  
Trisha Wise-Draper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Allograft Rejection ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Multicenter Phase

BackgroundSolid organ transplantation (SOT) has emerged as an important lifesaving procedure for patients with a wide range of end-organ diseases characterized by dysfunction or specific organ function failure. SOT rejection is a major complication requiring patients (pts) to undergo lifelong immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection.1Skin cancers (SCs) including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) are common post transplant malignancies.2 SC in SOT pts is generally managed with surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in SOT recipients has improved outcomes but are associated with the high risk of allograft rejection.3–5 Thus, there is a high unmet need for a safe and effective treatment that also protects pts from allograft rejection. RP1 is an oncolytic virus (HSV-1) that expresses a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP R-) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). In preclinical studies, RP1 induced immunogenic tumor cell death and provided potent systemic anti-tumor activity6 and clinical data in combination with nivolumab has demonstrated a high rate of deep and durable response in patients with advanced SCs.7 The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of single agent RP1 in kidney and liver transplant recipients with SCs, with focus on CSCC. After determining the safety and tolerability in the initial cohort with kidney and liver transplants the study may also enroll heart and lung transplant recipients.MethodsThis study will enroll up to 65 evaluable allograft transplantation pts with locally advanced or metastatic SCs. Key inclusion criteria are pts with confirmed recurrent, locally advanced or metastatic CSCC and up to 10 pts with non-CSCC SC, stable allograft function and ECOG performance status of ≤1. Pts with prior systemic anti-cancer treatment are allowed. Key exclusion criteria are prior treatment with an oncolytic therapy, active herpetic infections or prior complications of HSV-1 infection and a history of organ graft rejection within 12 months. Pts will receive an initial dose of 1 x 10^6 plaque-forming units (PFU) of RP1. Two weeks later they will receive 1 x 10^7 PFU of RP1 and continue every two weeks until pre-specified study endpoints are met. RP1 will be administered by intra-tumoral injection including through imaging guidance as clinically appropriate. The primary objective of the trial is to assess efficacy determined by ORR and safety of single agent RP1. Additional secondary endpoints include DOR, CR, DCR, PFS and OS.Trial RegistrationNCT04349436ReferencesFrohn C, Fricke L, Puchta JC, Kirchner H. The effect of HLA-C matching on acute renal transplant rejection. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16(2):355–60.Madeleine MM, Patel NS, Plasmeijer EI, Engels EA, Bouwes Bavinck JN, Toland AE, Green AC; the Keratinocyte Carcinoma Consortium (KeraCon) Immunosuppression Working Group. Epidemiology of keratinocyte carcinomas after organ transplantation. Br J Dermatol 2017;177(5):1208–1216.Spain L, Higgins R, Gopalakrishnan K, Turajlic S, Gore M, Larkin J. Acute renal allograft rejection after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 2016;27(6):1135–1137.Herz S, Höfer T, Papapanagiotou M, Leyh JC, Meyenburg S, Schadendorf D, Ugurel S, Roesch A, Livingstone E, Schilling B, Franklin C. Checkpoint inhibitors in chronic kidney failure and an organ transplant recipient. Eur J Cancer 2016;67:66-72.Kittai AS, Oldham H, Cetnar J, Taylor M. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in organ transplant ptss. J Immunother 2017;40(7):277–281.Thomas S, Kuncheria L, Roulstone V, Kyula JN, Mansfield D, Bommareddy PK, Smith H, Kaufman HL, Harrington KJ, Coffin RS. Development of a new fusion-enhanced oncolytic immunotherapy platform based on herpes simplex virus type 1. J Immunother Cancer 2019 10;7(1):214.Middleton M, Aroldi F, Sacco J, Milhem M, Curti B, Vanderwalde A, Baum S, Samson A, Pavlick A, Chesney J, Niu J, Rhodes T, Bowles T, Conry R, Olsson-Brown A, Earl-Laux D, Kaufman H, Bommareddy P, Deterding A, Samakoglu S, Coffin R, Harrington K. 422 An open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 clinical trial of RP1, an enhanced potency oncolytic HSV, combined with nivolumab: updated results from the skin cancer cohorts. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8(3): doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-SITC2020.0422Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by institutional review board or the local ethics committee at each participating site. Informed consent was obtained from patients before participating in the trial.

Cell-Mediated Immune Responses After Influenza Vaccination of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Secondary Outcomes Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 221 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud G L’huillier ◽  
Victor H Ferreira ◽  
Cedric Hirzel ◽  
Yoichiro Natori ◽  
Jaclyn Slomovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Influenza A H1n1

Abstract Background Despite annual immunization, solid organ transplant (SOT) patients remain at increased risk for severe influenza infection because of suboptimal vaccine immunogenicity. We aimed to compare the CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses of the high-dose (HD) and the standard-dose (SD) trivalent inactivated vaccine. Methods We collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells pre- and postimmunization from 60 patients enrolled in a randomized trial of HD versus SD vaccine (30 HD; 30 SD) during the 2016–2017 influenza season. Results The HD vaccine elicited significantly greater monofunctional and polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses against influenza A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B. For example, median vaccine-elicited influenza-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T cells were higher in recipients of the HD than SD vaccine after stimulation with influenza A/H1N1 (1193 vs 0 per 106 CD4+ T cells; P = .003), A/H3N2 (1154 vs 51; P = .008), and B (1102 vs 0; P = .001). Likewise, vaccine-elicited influenza-specific polyfunctional CD8+ T cells were higher in recipients of the HD than SD vaccine after stimulation with influenza B (367 vs 0; P = .002). Conclusions Our study provides novel evidence that HD vaccine elicits greater cellular responses compared with the SD vaccine in SOT recipients, which provides support to preferentially consider use of HD vaccination in the SOT setting.

Bortezomib and Dexamethasone as Maintenance therapy in Relapse/Refractory multiple myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2771-2771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Benevolo ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Patrizia Pregno ◽  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Barbara Botto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Haemoglobin Concentration ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number

Abstract Background: Despite the advances in the treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) in the past decade, it still remains an incurable haematological disease and the majority of patients still experience relapse. Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor approved for the treatment of MM patients. Several studies have demonstrated its efficacy as front-line therapy and in relapsed, advanced MM but no data are available as maintenance therapy (MT) in refractory/relapsed MM. Patients and methods: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of bortezomib/dexamethasone MT (1.3 mg/mq bortezomib on days 1 and 15; 20 mg dexamethasone on days 1–2 and 15–16 in a 28-day cycle for a total of 6 cycles) in patients with refractory/relapse MM who responded to salvage therapy. Results: From October 2004 until April 2008, 40 MM patients have been enrolled. The characteristics of the patients were as follows: 20 males and 20 females, median age was 70 years (IQR:66–75). Median haemoglobin value was 10.85 (IQR:10.175–12.225) and 7 (18%) patients had a renal failure. Skeletal disease was present in 27 (68%) patients. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (1–4). The salvage therapy included bortezomib as single agent or in combination with steroids and/or thalidomide in 12 patients (30%). Median time from diagnosis to the first dose of MT was 41 months (IQR:26–59). The median number of bortezomib infusion was 8 (1–18). After a median follow up of 13 months (IQR:6–31), 10 patients died for PD and 4 patients for infections. The MT improved the quality of response and converted in 1 CR and 4 VGPR the PR after salvage therapy in 5 patients; moreover, we observed a remarkable decreased of M component in 11 patients. The median time to progression was 23 months (95%CI: 8-not reached) with a progression free-survival at 1 year of 69% (95%CI: 50–82). The overall survival at 1 years was 63% and the cumulative incidence of death due to PD adjusted for competitive risk event was 25% (95%IC:10–41). In a univariate analysis the response rate to MT was not significantly affected by age, sex, number or type of previous therapy and haemoglobin concentration. Non-dose-limiting toxicities included neuropathy grade 1 (12 pts), herpes zoster reactivation (2 pts) and gastrointestinal affections (1 pts). Conclusion: The combination bortezomib/dexamethasone can be safely administered as a maintenance therapy in relapse/refractoy MM. These preliminary data suggest that bortezomib/dexametasone MT can improve remission duration and also quality of response with an acceptable toxicity.

Repertoire, memory subsets, and function of EBV-specific CD8+T cells in peripheral blood from stable solid organ transplant patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. S41
Author(s):  
Camila Macedo ◽  
Iulia Popescu ◽  
Alison Logar ◽  
Kareem Abu-Elmagd ◽  
Ron Shapiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
And Function

scholarly journals Potential Application of T-Follicular Regulatory Cell Therapy in Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Dudreuilh ◽  
Sumoyee Basu ◽  
Cristiano Scottà ◽  
Anthony Dorling ◽  
Giovanna Lombardi
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Germinal Center ◽  
Small Proportion ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Solid Organ Transplantation ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Lymphoid Organs ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Potential Candidate ◽  
Preclinical Research

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) constitute a small proportion of circulating CD4+ T cells that function to maintain homeostasis and prevent autoimmunity. In light of their powerful immunosuppressive and tolerance-promoting properties, Tregs have become an interesting potential candidate for therapeutic use in conditions such as solid organ transplant or to treat autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. Clinical studies have demonstrated the safety of polyclonally expanded Tregs in graft-versus-host disease, type 1 diabetes, and more recently in renal and liver transplantation. However, Tregs are heterogenous. Recent insights indicate that only a small proportion of Tregs, called T follicular regulatory cells (Tfr) regulate interactions between B cells and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells within the germinal center. Tfr have been mainly described in mouse models due to the challenges of sampling secondary lymphoid organs in humans. However, emerging human studies, characterize Tfr as being CD4+CD25+FOXP3+CXCR5+ cells with different levels of PD-1 and ICOS expression depending on their localization, in the blood or the germinal center. The exact role they play in transplantation remains to be elucidated. However, given the potential ability of these cells to modulate antibody responses to allo-antigens, there is great interest in exploring translational applications in situations where B cell responses need to be regulated. Here, we review the current knowledge of Tfr and the role they play focusing on human diseases and transplantation. We also discuss the potential future applications of Tfr therapy in transplantation and examine the evidence for a role of Tfr in antibody production, acute and chronic rejection and tertiary lymphoid organs. Furthermore, the potential impact of immunosuppression on Tfr will be explored. Based on preclinical research, we will analyse the rationale of Tfr therapy in solid organ transplantation and summarize the different challenges to be overcome before Tfr therapy can be implemented into clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document