Identification of Clinically Relevant Predictive MRD Checkpoints in AML Patients with NPM1 Mutations: A Study of the AML Study Group (AMLSG).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1586-1586
Author(s):  
Jan Krönke ◽  
Richard Schlenk ◽  
Kai-Ole Jensen ◽  
Karina Eiwen ◽  
Marianne Habdank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Induction Cycle

Abstract Abstract 1586 Poster Board I-612 Background Mutations in the nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) gene represent the most frequent gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with highest frequency (50-60%) in cytogenetically normal (CN)-AML. Several studies have shown the applicability and prognostic value of an NPM1 mutation (NPM1mut)-based assay for detection of minimal residual disease (MRD). So far, there are no studies evaluating the prognostic value of NPM1mut MRD levels in a large controlled cohort of AML patients (pts) enrolled on prospective clinical trials. Aims To evaluate the prognostic value of NPM1mut MRD levels in younger (16 to 60 years) AML pts harbouring NPM1 mutations type A, B or D, and to assess the influence of concurrent FLT3 internal tandem duplications (ITD). Methods All pts were enrolled in the prospective AMLSG 07-04 and AML HD98A treatment trials. Treatment comprised double induction therapy with ICE (idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide) followed by high-dose cytarabine-based consolidation, autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Levels of NPM1mut expression ratios, defined as NPM1mut copies per 104ABL copies, were determined by RQ-PCR using TaqMan technology. Dilution series showed a maximum sensitivity of 10-6 and high specificity as no wildtype NPM1 could be detected. Results A total of 1079 samples, [bone marrow (BM), n=1062; peripheral blood, n= 17) from 212 pts were analyzed at diagnosis, after each treatment cycle, during follow-up and at relapse (median number of samples per pt, n=4; range, 1-16). NPM1mut expression ratios at diagnosis varied between 1.1×104 and 10.4×106 (median, 6.9×105). Pretreatment transcript levels were not associated with clinical characteristics (e.g., age, white cell counts, BM blasts) and did not impact on relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Following the first induction cycle, the median decrease of the MRD level ratio normalized to pretreatment levels was 4.21×10-3, independent of the presence of concurrent FLT3-ITD (p=0.39). After the 2nd induction cycle, the median reduction of MRD levels was significantly stronger in the FLT3-ITDneg group (6.75×10-5) compared with the FLT3-ITDpos group (4.19×10-4) (p=0.003) and this differential effect was observed throughout consolidation therapy. For evaluation of the prognostic impact of NPM1mut MRD levels, we compared patients achieving PCR-negativity with those with positive values at different checkpoints. The first reliable checkpoint was after double-induction therapy: the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 4 years of PCR-negative patients (n=27) was 0% compared with 48% (SE, 4.4%, p<0.00001) for PCR-positive patients (n=105). This translated into a significant better OS (p=0.0005). The second checkpoint was after completion of consolidation therapy (first measurement during follow-up period). Again, 4-year CIR was significantly (p<.00001) lower in the PCR-negative group with 11% (SE, 6.5%) compared with 51% (SE, 4.8%) in PCR-positive patients, again translating in a significantly better OS (p<.00001). In addition, the level of NPM1mut expression ratio at any time point examined after completion of therapy correlated with the risk of relapse, since 20 of 22 pts with a value above 1000 NPM1mut/104ABL copies relapsed after a median interval of 90 days (range, 11-709 days). The remaining 2 pts had increasing levels at last follow-up but are still in continuous complete remission (CR). In a few cases relapse prediction appeared to be limited due to inadequate increase of NPM1mut expression levels or to loss of NPM1 mutation at the time of relapse (n=5). On the other hand, we observed a number of pts (n=17) in continuous CR who had intermittent low (<1000 NPM1mut/104ABL copies) NPM1mut expression ratios. Conclusions The levels of NPM1mut expression at two distinct checkpoints, after double induction therapy and after completion of consolidation therapy, can be used as a prognostic factor in NPM1mut AML pts. The adverse outcome of pts carrying a concurrent FLT3-ITD is reflected by a significant lower reduction of tumor burden. Disclosures Göhring: Celgene Corp.:. Schlegelberger:Celgene Corp.:.

Quantitative Monitoring of NPM1 Mutation A Minimal Residual Disease Identifies Patients At High Risk for Relapse within the ELN Favorable Risk Group

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1404-1404
Author(s):  
Max Hubmann ◽  
Marion Subklewe ◽  
Thomas Köhnke ◽  
Stephanie Schneider ◽  
Annika Dufour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 1404 Introduction: Molecular analyses of leukemia-specific markers has led to an improvement of the prognosis evaluation in patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The European Leukemia Net (ELN) has published a classification which separates different subgroups by cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses. Nevertheless, there are still pts suffering from disease recurrence within the ELN favorable risk group. To identify these pts at high risk for relapse the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) of leukemia-specific markers could become an important diagnostic tool. In this study the potential of MRD monitoring by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) of NPM1 A mutation (NPM1 A) at different checkpoints within the ELN favorable risk group of pts with NPM1 A and without FLT3-ITD was investigated. Methods: Pts participating in the AMLCG99, AMLCG2004, and AMLCG2008 trial were prospectively or retrospectively screened for NPM1 mutation and FLT3-ITD by melting curve analyses. 334 pts were screened positive for NPM1 mutation and 262 pts showed a NPM1 A, 78.4 % of all NPM1 mutations. For MRD monitoring a relative RT-PCR was performed in 538 samples of 178 NPM1 A positive pts with a sensitivity of 10-6. MRD was monitored at diagnosis, in aplasia, after induction therapy, after consolidation therapy, and during the follow-up. MRD levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene ABL1 and expressed as a ratio to an internal control of known concentration. Results: In the analysis of the NPM1 A positive and FLT3-ITD negative pts (ELN favorable risk group) 82.5% (n=85) achieved complete remission (CR) after induction therapy. With a median follow-up of 26 (range 1–118) months, 36 (42.9%) pts relapsed within this subgroup. In aplasia, and after induction therapy, pts with a long-lasting remission showed significantly lower NPM1 A ratios in contrast to pts who relapsed during the follow-up. Via Receiver-Operating Curves (ROC) we analyzed the diagnostic power to identify pts at high risk for relapse and determined clinical useable cut-offs at the different checkpoints. ROC were significantly associated with disease recurrence at the checkpoints in aplasia and after induction therapy, but not after consolidation therapy. After induction therapy, a cut-off with a ratio of 0.01 was determined. This cut-off separates the patient cohort into two prognostic groups. NPM1 A MRD levels above the cut-offs result in an increased risk of relapse compared to pts with MRD level below this cut-off. This is reflected in a significantly lower 2-year relapse free survival (RFS) of 18% versus 72% (Figure 1). In 25 pts of this favorable risk group follow-up samples in CR were available for analysis of an upcoming relapse within 100 days of sampling. Only 2 of these pts developed relapse within of the next 100 days, but both pts showed increasing MRD levels prior to relapse. 18 relapse samples were available in this subgroup and interestingly, one patient (5.5%) was NPM1 A negative at relapse. When we further enrolled the FLT3-ITD positive pts into our analyses, not surprisingly we found a negative impact on the RFS of MRD positive and MRD negative pts. Conclusions: Our results confirm the observations of other studies that showed the prognostic impact of NPM1 MRD monitoring by RT-PCR. With the MRD monitoring we could identify pts at high risk for relapse within the ELN favorable risk group. Particularly high MRD levels after the induction therapy were strongly associated with a worse RFS. This and previously published data of others demonstrate that in addition to pre-therapeutic factors, the individual MRD course should be used as prognostic factor for the guidance of treatment and pts with high or increasing levels of MRD should undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation, if eligible. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

High Prognostic Impact of Flowcytometric Minimal Residual Disease Detection In Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Prospective Data From the HOVON/SAKK 42a Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 760-760
Author(s):  
Monique Terwijn ◽  
Angèle Kelder ◽  
Wim L.J. van Putten ◽  
Alexander N. Snel ◽  
Vincent H.J. van der elden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Induction Cycle ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 760 Currently, the most important prognostic factors for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) include molecular aberrancies and karyotype of the leukemic blasts. Although these factors have showed to be of utmost importance in upfront risk stratification in current treatment schedules, the treatment outcome of patients within as such defined risk groups is still quite heterogeneous. Therefore, there is an unmet need for therapy-dependent prognostic factors which can be implemented into risk-adapted treatment strategies. Minimal residual disease (MRD) frequency is such a parameter. MRD cells are considered responsible for the outgrowth of AML after treatment, leading to a relapse in 30–40% of the patients in complete remission (CR). In this study, we are the first to report prospective multicenter data on the prognostic impact of MRD frequency in adult AML. In our retrospective study (N.Feller et al. Leukemia 2004), we explored which cut-off points for percentage of MRD cells would define MRD positive (levels above cut-off, MRD+) patients with a relatively poor prognosis, from MRD negative (levels below cut-off, MRD-) patients who showed a longer overall and relapse-free survival (OS and RFS). In search for the most optimal cut-off level which can be used for clinical purpose in risk stratification-directed therapy, we used these cut-offs to evaluate the prognostic value in the current prospective setting. Diagnosis and follow-up samples were collected of 462 patients treated uniformly according to the HOVON/SAKK42a protocol (www.hovon.nl) and MRD frequency was assessed blindly without knowledge of clinical course. MRD detection was accomplished by immunophenotyping by flow cytometry (FCM) through aberrant expression of markers on AML blasts. Together with the expression of normal immature cell markers and/or myeloid lineage markers, this offers a leukemia associated phenotype (LAP). Each LAP was individually designed for each patient in diagnosis bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood. Subsequently, BM samples obtained during follow-up were analysed for the presence of LAP-positive cells. MRD frequency was expressed as a percentage of leukocytes. The median MRD frequencies of patients in clinical CR after first induction cycle (n=164), second induction cycle (n=182) and consolidation (n=121) were 0.040%, 0.022% and 0.020%, respectively. The cut-off levels for MRD frequency as defined retrospectively were all significant in the identification of patients with adverse (MRD+) and favourable (MRD-) OS and RFS, respectively. After the first cycle, the most significant cut-off was 0.8%, leading to 17 MRD+ patients who showed a median RFS of only 8.6 months, while 147 MRD- patients had a median RFS of >47 months (p=0.003,A). The relative risk of relapse (RR) was 2.9 (95% c.i. 1.4–6.0, p=0.004). After the second induction cycle, a cut-off level of 0.06% was most significant. Above this cut-off, 49 patients showed a median RFS of 7 months, while 133 MRD- patients showed a RFS of more than 47 months (p<0.00001, fig B). The RR was 3.2 (95% c.i. 2.0–5.0, p<0.00001). After consolidation therapy, 11 MRD+ patients with extremely poor prognosis were identified (median RFS 7.3 months vs. >47 months for 110 MRD- patients, p<0.00001, fig C), with a RR of 10.6 (95% c.i. 4.9–22.8, p<0.00001). Multivariate analysis was performed with conventional prognostic factors for AML: cytogenetic risk groups and time to achieve CR. After every cycle of therapy, MRD frequency was an independent prognostic factor for RFS after all cycles (1st cycle: p=0.010, 2nd cycle and consolidation p<0.00001) and for OS after 1st (p=0.023) and 2nd induction cycle (p=0.010). In this prospective multicenter study, already after first induction cycle, MRD detection by FCM was an independent significant factor in the identification of poor prognostic patients. In future treatment studies, risk stratification, e.g. for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, should not only be based on risk estimation determined at diagnosis, but also on MRD frequency as a therapy-dependent prognostic factor. This work was supported by Netherlands Cancer Foundation KWF. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Prognostic Impact of Minimal Residual Disease inCBFB-MYH11–Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (23) ◽  
pp. 3724-3729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Corbacioglu ◽  
Claudia Scholl ◽  
Richard F. Schlenk ◽  
Karina Eiwen ◽  
Juan Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) expressing the CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcript.Patients and MethodsQuantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on 684 bone marrow (BM; n = 331) and/or peripheral blood (PB; n = 353) samples (median, 13 samples per patient) from 53 younger adult (16 to 60 years old) patients with AML treated in prospective German-Austrian AML Study Group treatment trials. Samples were obtained at diagnosis (BM, n = 45; PB, n = 48), during treatment course (BM, n = 153; PB, n = 122), and at follow-up (BM, n = 133; PB, n = 183). To evaluate the applicability of PB for MRD detection, 198 paired BM and PB samples obtained at identical time points were analyzed.ResultsThe following three clinically relevant checkpoints were identified during consolidation and early follow-up that predicted relapse: achievement of PCR negativity in at least one BM sample during consolidation therapy (2-year relapse-free survival [RFS], 79% v 54% for PCR positivity; P = .035); achievement of PCR negativity in at least two BM or PB samples during consolidation therapy and early follow-up (≤ 3 months; 2-year RFS, P = .001; overall survival, P = .01); and conversion from PCR negativity to PCR positivity with copy ratios of more than 10 after consolidation therapy. Analysis of paired BM and PB samples revealed BM samples to be more sensitive during the course of therapy, whereas for follow-up, PB samples were equally informative.ConclusionWe defined clinically relevant MRD checkpoints that allow for the identification of patients with CBFB-MYH11–positive AML who are at high risk of relapse. Monitoring of CBFB-MYH11 transcript levels should be incorporated into future clinical trials to guide therapeutic decisions.

scholarly journals Midostaurin in Combination with Intensive Induction and As Single Agent Maintenance Therapy after Consolidation Therapy with Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation or High-Dose Cytarabine (NCT01477606)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 322-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Schlenk ◽  
Konstanze Döhner ◽  
Helmut Salih ◽  
Andrea Kündgen ◽  
Walter Fiedler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Induction Cycle

Abstract Background: Internal tandem duplications (ITD) in the receptor tyrosine kinase FLT3 occur in roughly 25% of younger adult patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), implicating FLT3 as a potential target for kinase inhibitor therapy. The multi-targeted kinase inhibitor midostaurin shows potent activity against FLT3 as a single agent but also in combination with intensive chemotherapy. Aims: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of midostaurin in combination with intensive induction therapy and as single agent maintenance therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) or high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC). Methods: The study includes adult pts (age 18-70 years (yrs)) with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD positive AML enrolled in the ongoing single-arm phase-II AMLSG 16-10 trial (NCT: NCT01477606). Pts with acute promyelocytic leukemia are not eligible. The presence of FLT3-ITD is analyzed within our diagnostic study AMLSG-BiO (NCT01252485) by Genescan-based fragment-length analysis (allelic ratio &gt;0.05 required to be FLT3-ITD positive). Induction therapy consists of daunorubicin (60 mg/m², d1-3) and cytarabine (200 mg/m², continuously, d1-7); midostaurin 50 mg bid is applied from day 8 onwards until 48h before start of the next treatment cycle. A second cycle is optional. For consolidation therapy, pts proceed to alloHSCT as first priority; if alloHSCT is not feasible, pts receive three cycles of age-adapted HIDAC in combination with midostaurin from day 6 onwards. In all pts maintenance therapy for one year is intended. This report focuses on the first cohort of the study (n=149) recruited between June 2012 and April 2014 prior to the amendment increasing the sample size; the amendment to the study is active since October 2014. Results: At study entry patient characteristics were median age 54 years (range, 20-70, 34% ≥ 60 yrs); median white cell count (WBC) 48.4G/l (range 1.1-178G/l); karyotype, n=103 normal, n=3 t(6;9), n=2 t(9;11), n=20 intermediate-2 and n=7 high-risk according to ELN recommendations, n=14 missing; mutated NPM1 n=92 (62%). Data on response to first induction therapy were available in 147 pts; complete remission (CR) 58.5%, partial remission (PR) 20.4%, refractory disease (RD) 15% and death 6.1%. A second induction cycle was given in 34 pts. Overall response after induction therapy was CR 75% and death 7.5%. Adverse events 3°/4° reported during the first induction cycle were most frequently gastrointestinal (n=34) and infections (n=81). During induction therapy midostaurin was interrupted, dose-reduced or stopped in 55% of the pts. Overall 94 pts received an alloHSCT, 85 in first CR (n=65 age&lt;60 yrs, n=20 age ≥60 yrs) and 9 pts after salvage outside the protocol or after relapse (n=70 from a matched unrelated and n=24 from a matched related donor). In pts receiving an alloHSCT within the protocol in median 2 chemotherapy cycles were applied before transplant (range 1-4) and the cumulative incidence of relapse and death at 12 months were 9.2% (SE 3.3%) and 19.5% (SE 4.8%). Maintenance therapy was started in 52 pts, 40 pts after alloHSCT and 12 pts after HIDAC. Only 4 adverse events 3°/4° were attributed to midostaurin. First analyses revealed a low cumulative incidence of relapse irrespective of the FLT3-ITD mutant to wildtype ratio (&lt;0.5 versus ≥0.5) in patients proceeding to alloHSCT with 12% and 5% as well as for those after HIDAC consolidation with 28% and 29%, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of midostaurin to intensive induction therapy and as maintenance after alloHSCT or HIDAC is feasible and compared to historical data may be most effective in those patients with a high FLT3-ITD mutant to wildtype ratio. Disclosures Schlenk: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Salwender:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Bristol Meyer Sqibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Götze:Celgene Corp.: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Fludarabine, High-Dose Cytarabine and Idarubicin-Based Induction May Overcome the Negative Prognostic Impact of FLT3-ITD in NPM1 Mutated AML, Irrespectively of FLT3-ITD Allelic Burden

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Paola Minetto ◽  
Anna Candoni ◽  
Fabio Guolo ◽  
Marino Clavio ◽  
Maria Elena Zannier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Genetic Aberration ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Allelic Burden

The mutations of NPM1 and FLT3-ITD represent the most frequent genetic aberration in acute myeloid leukemia. Indeed, the presence of an NPM1 mutation reduces the negative prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD in patients treated with conventional “3+7” induction. However, little information is available on their prognostic role with intensified regimens. Here, we investigated the efficacy of a fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine and idarubicin induction (FLAI) in 149 consecutive fit AML patients (median age 52) carrying the NPM1 and/or FLT3-ITD mutation, treated from 2008 to 2018. One-hundred-and-twenty-nine patients achieved CR (86.6%). After a median follow up of 68 months, 3-year overall survival was 58.6%. Multivariate analysis disclosed that both NPM1mut (p < 0.05) and ELN 2017 risk score (p < 0.05) were significant predictors of survival. NPM1-mutated patients had a favorable outcome, with no significant differences between patients with or without concomitant FLT3-ITD (p = 0.372), irrespective of FLT3-ITD allelic burden. Moreover, in landmark analysis, performing allogeneic transplantation (HSCT) in first CR proved to be beneficial only in ELN 2017 high-risk patients. Our data indicate that FLAI exerts a strong anti-leukemic effect in younger AML patients with NPM1mut and question the role of HSCT in 1st CR in NPM1mut patients with concomitant FLT3-ITD.

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Monitoring in CBFB-MYH11 Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Is of Prognostic Relevance for Relapse-Free Survival.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2298-2298
Author(s):  
Andrea Corbacioglu ◽  
Claudia Scholl ◽  
Karina Eiwen ◽  
Lars Bullinger ◽  
Stefan Frohling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Fusion Transcript ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) associated with specific gene fusions is an important tool for the assessment of response to treatment and the individual risk of relapse. The real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RQ-PCR) method allows the quantification of fusion transcript levels at distinct time points during treatment. While in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) MRD monitoring has been clearly shown to be predictive for clinical outcome, the prognostic value of MRD in CBFB-MYH11 AML could not consistently been demonstrated yet. Small patient populations and the availability of bone marrow (BM)/peripheral blood (PB) samples at defined time points mainly hamper most studies. We evaluated the prognostic impact of MRD in a large cohort of CBFB-MYH11 AML by RQ-PCR. A total of 44 patients (16–60 years) were treated within one of the AMLSG treatment trials (AMLHD93 n=4, AMLHD98A n=27, AMLSG07-04 n=13). Patient samples (BM and/or PB) were collected at study entry (n=75), during treatment (n=199), and during follow up (n=140). Following high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation therapy, patients received a second course of HiDAC (n=25); autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) (n=13) or allogeneic SCT from a matched related family donor (n=6) depending on the treatment protocol. Median follow up was 22.5 months. Quantitative CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcript expression was measured by RQ-PCR using TaqMan technology. Primers and probes were chosen according to Europe Against Cancer (EAC) standard protocols. Sensitivities ranged from 10−3 to 10−4.Transcript levels at diagnosis ranged from 6208 to 312987 (median 34293.5). There was no prognostic impact of pretreatment transcript levels on relapse free survival (RFS). The ratio of transcript levels after 2 induction cycles and pretreatment levels ranged from 0 to 0.0049; again, this ratio had no impact on RFS. In contrast, during consolidation therapy 63% of the patients became RQ-PCR negative and RFS was significantly superior (RFS after 2 years 75%) compared to RQ-PCR positive patients (RFS after 2 years 32%) (p=0.03). After consolidation, seven of the RQ-PCR negative patients became positive at least in one BM-sample during follow up. Four patients developed transcript levels above 10 and all relapsed, whereas the three patients with transcript levels remaining below 10 are in continuous remission (p=0.0001). In our study, transcript levels during and after consolidation therapy are significantly associated with clinical outcome in CBFB-MYH11 AML. Risk-adapted therapy may be considered for those patients remaining positive during consolidation therapy. The identification of transcript levels above 10 after consolidation therapy might allow early treatment decisions.

High Dose Daunorubicin Improves Survival in AML up to Age 60, Across All Cytogenetic Risk Groups Including Patients with Unfavorable Cytogenetic Risk, and FLT3-ITD Mutant AML: Updated Analyses from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Trial E1900

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 373-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Hugo F Fernandez ◽  
Hillard M. Lazarus ◽  
Jacob M. Rowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial E1900 (E1900) showed that induction therapy with a high daily dose of daunorubicin (90 mg/m2) (DNR 90) improves survival in younger patients (pts) (<50 yrs) and intermediate (int) cytogenetic risk AML, but at 2 years of follow-up no benefit was seen in older pts (50-60 yrs), or in those with unfavorable cytogenetic risk or FLT3-ITD mutant AML (Fernandez et al. N Engl J Med 2009). Here we update results of E1900 with longer follow-up, focusing on the benefit of DNR 90 in cytogenetic and common molecular subgroups. Methods: Overall survival (OS) was measured from randomization for induction therapy to death from any cause (censored at last contact). Hazard ratios (HR) for death were computed using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models; multivariable Cox models were adjusted for sex, age, hemoglobin level, leukocyte count, platelet count, and cytogenetic profile. All conclusions regarding the impact of DNR 90, unless noted, are similar based on univariate and multivariable analysis. Results: Overall, 657 pts were enrolled with a median follow-up of 80.1 months. The HR for death in the DNR 90 group as compared with the standard-dose daunorubicin (45 mg/m2) (DNR 45) group was 0.74 (p=0.001). Pts <50 yrs benefited from DNR 90 (p = 0.002) while those >=50 yrs were not proven to benefit (p = 0.12). Pts with favorable (fav) and int. cytogenetic risk benefited from DNR 90 (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). A benefit for pts with unfavorable cytogenetic risk was seen on multivariable analysis (p = 0.04). Impact of DNR 90 by mutation status: The 3 most common mutations were FLT3-ITD (24%), NPM1 (26%), and DNMT3A (24%). AML pts with any of these 3 mutations benefited from DNR 90 (p = 0.009, p = 0.002, and p = 0.02, respectively). FLT3-ITD pts who received DNR 90 had a 4-yr OS of 31%. Benefit was seen in pts age 50-60 with FLT3-ITD or NPM1 mutation (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). No benefit of DNR 90 was seen in a small cohort of pts with MLL-PTD (p = 0.06). Benefit of DNR 90 in FLT3-ITD, NPM1, and DNMT3A mutant AML was confirmed in the int. cytogenetic risk group. Impact of DNR 90 on prognostic impact of NPM1: The presence of an NPM1 mutation conferred an improvement in OS in the DNR 90 group which was not seen in the DNR 45 group (p = 0.01 vs p = 0.3). This finding was confirmed in the int. cytogenetic risk group. Conclusion: With median follow-up of over 6 years on E1900, we confirm that DNR 90 improves outcome in pts with fav/int cytogenetic risk, DNMT3A or NPM1 mutant AML, or age < 50 (Patel et al. N Engl J Med 2012). Additionally, we now demonstrate that DNR 90 additionally benefits pts with FLT3-ITD AML, and pts with unfavorable cytogenetic risk, regardless of age. Moreover, we show that the favorable prognostic impact of the NPM1 mutation is only present when pts receive DNR 90. Given the benefit of DNR 90 across all cytogenetic risk groups as well as common molecularly defined subgroups of AML, DNR 90 should be the standard for all pts up to age 60 who are candidates for induction chemotherapy. Table HR for death by AML cohort. Subgroup N Univariate Model DNR 45 DNR 90 HR (DNR 90/DNR 45) & 95% CI Wald P All patients (n=657) Overall 330 327 0.74 (0.61, 0.89) 0.001 Age < 50 yrs³ 50 yrs 188 142 172 155 0.66 (0.50, 0.85) 0.81 (0.62, 1.06) 0.002 0.12 Cytogenetic Favorable Intermediate Unfavorable 38 232 59 51 212 63 0.51 (0.28, 0.93) 0.76 (0.61, 0.96) 0.79 (0.54, 1.16) 0.03 0.02 0.22 FLT3-ITD WT MUT 215 83 241 64 0.74 (0.59, 0.92) 0.61 (0.42, 0.89) 0.008 0.009 MLL-PTD WT MUT 290 16 296 15 0.70 (0.58, 0.86) 0.46 (0.21, 1.04) 0.0004 0.06 NPM1* WT MUT 180 65 192 65 0.70 (0.55, 0.89) 0.50 (0.32, 0.78) 0.003 0.002 DNMT3A WT MUT 177 61 194 58 0.66 (0.52, 0.85) 0.62 (0.41, 0.94) 0.001 0.02 * Statistically significant test of interaction (p<0.2) Figure 1A: Overall Survival by NPM1 Mutation Status and Treatment Arm Figure 1A:. Overall Survival by NPM1 Mutation Status and Treatment Arm Figure 1B: Overall Survival of FLT-ITD Mutant AML Patients by Treatment Arm Figure 1B:. Overall Survival of FLT-ITD Mutant AML Patients by Treatment Arm Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Hamy ◽  
Lauren Darrigues ◽  
Enora Laas ◽  
Diane De Croze ◽  
Lucian Topciu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Residual Cancer ◽  
Cancer Burden ◽  
Residual Cancer Burden ◽  
Increased Risk

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) quantifies residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Its predictive value has not been validated on large cohorts with long-term follow up. The objective of this work is to independently evaluate the prognostic value of the RCB index depending on BC subtypes (Luminal, HER2-positive and triple negative (TNBCs)).MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the RCB index on surgical specimens from a cohort of T1-T3NxM0 BC patients treated with NAC between 2002 and 2012. We analyzed the association between RCB index and relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) among the global population, after stratification by BC subtypes.Results717 patients were included (luminal BC (n = 222, 31%), TNBC (n = 319, 44.5%), HER2-positive (n = 176, 24.5%)). After a median follow-up of 99.9 months, RCB index was significantly associated with RFS. The RCB-0 patients displayed similar prognosis when compared to the RCB-I group, while patients from the RCB-II and RCB-III classes were at increased risk of relapse (RCB-II versus RCB-0: HR=3.25 CI [2.1-5.1] p<0.001; RCB-III versus RCB-0: HR=5.6 CI [3.5-8.9] p<0.001). The prognostic impact of RCB index was significant for TNBC and HER2-positive cancers; but not for luminal cancers (Pinteraction = 0.07). The prognosis of RCB-III patients was poor (8-years RFS: 52.7%, 95% CI [44.8 – 62.0]) particularly in the TNBC subgroup, where the median RFS was 12.7 months.ConclusionRCB index is a reliable prognostic score. RCB accurately identifies patients at a high risk of recurrence (RCB-III) with TNBC or HER2-positive BC who must be offered second-line adjuvant therapies.

Personalized, ctDNA analysis to detect minimal residual disease and identify patients at high risk of relapse with multiple myeloma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8029-8029
Author(s):  
Binod Dhakal ◽  
Shruti Sharma ◽  
Svetlana Shchegrova ◽  
Minu Maninder ◽  
Meenakshi Malhotra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Ctdna Analysis

8029 Background: Despite treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (AHCT), MM patients invariably relapse. MRD-negativity post-AHCT has emerged as the most important prognostic marker. Currently, MRD in MM is monitored via bone marrow aspirate sampling. Marrow MRD assays are limited by the spatial heterogeneity of marrow MM localization; extramedullary disease and sampling variability of marrow aspiration. Sensitive, non-invasive blood-based MRD assay is an unmet need. ctDNA as a noninvasive biomarker can be utilized to predict relapse in MM. Here we attempt to evaluate MRD using ctDNA in AHCT recipients with MM. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, we analyzed ctDNA MRD in blood samples collected from 28 patients with MM after upfront AHCT. A total of 80 plasma timepoints were available pre and post AHCT with a median follow-up of 92.4 months. Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) at 10-4 level was used to assess the MRD from the BM biopsy. Individual bone marrow aspirates or FFPE slides from the time of MM diagnosis and matched normal blood were whole-exome sequenced, and somatic mutations were identified. MRD assessment at 3 months post-AHCT was performed by ctDNA analysis using a personalized, tumor-informed (SignateraTM, bespoke mPCR NGS assay). The prognostic value of ctDNA was evaluated by correlating MRD status with clinical outcomes. Results: Table provides the baseline disease characteristics. Median age was 67 [41-75] years and 16 [57.1%] were males. ctDNA was detectable in 70.8% (17/24) of pre-AHCT, 53.6% (15/28) of ̃3 months post-AHCT, and 39.2% (11/28) of patients during the surveillance phase post-AHCT. Of the 15 ctDNA MRD positive patients, 93.3% (n=14) experienced relapse on follow-up (hazard ratio: 5.64; 95% CI: 1.8-17; p=0.0003). Patients negative for ctDNA at 3 months post-AHCT had significantly superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to positive (median PFS, 84 months vs. 31 months; p=0.003) The positive predictive value (PPV) for relapse among patients positive for ctDNA at 3 months post-AHCT was 93.3%, and significantly higher than marrow MFC of 68.4%. Conclusions: Our study shows the feasibility that a tumor-informed assay on archival blood samples is predictive of relapse post-AHCT. Future prospective studies with real-time marrow NGS and ctDNA samples are needed to define the role of ctDNA in MM and its prognostic significance.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Improving the Definition of Response Assessment: Prognostic Value of Minimal Residual Disease Combined with PET/CT at Day 100 Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Miguel Gonzalez-Velez ◽  
Mariano Arribas ◽  
Heidi E. Kosiorek ◽  
Richard Butterfield ◽  
Carlo Guerrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Minimal Residual

Introduction: Response assessment at day 100 post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) is associated with long-term relapsed free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM). The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) are the preferred criteria to define best response to treatment and define relapse. In the last years, response assessment has incorporated minimal residual disease (MRD) status -associated with improved RFS and OS (Munshi et al); and PET/CT combined with clinical characteristics -also associated with favorable outcomes (Zamagni et al. NCT01910987; MMY3033). The 2016 IMWG MRD criteria, combined imaging (PET/CT) plus next-generation sequencing (NGS) MRD-negative to define complete response (CR). To our knowledge, there is limited data examining the correlation and prognostic value of MRD and FDG-PET/CT at day 100 post ASCT in MM. IN this study, we aimed to determine the prognostic valued of MRD by NGS combined with PET/CT in RFS and OS status after high dose chemotherapy and ASCT in MM. Methods: Patients who underwent ASCT for MM at Mayo Clinic Arizona and had MRD and PET/CT data were included in the study. Clinical data was obtained via retrospective chart review. Cytogenetic risk (CyR) was classified using the mSMART criteria . Disease and ASCT related characteristics were compared by MRD status. MRD was measured by NGS on bone marrow aspirates using the previosly validated clonoSEQ ® Assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, Seattle, USA) tracking the IgH, IgK and IgL rearrangements at a minimum sensitivity level of 10-5. MRD was defined by residual clonal cells per million nucleated cells as: negative= 0, borderline= 1-5, positive &gt;5. PET/CT scans were performed locally at baseline and at day 100. Comparisons were performed using the chi-square test for categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuos variables, McNemar's test and Cohens's Kappa for agreement measures. Results: A total of 103 patients had matched MRD and PET/CT assessment around day 100 (+/-9 days) and were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range, 54-66 years), 71 patients (68.9%) were men. CyR was standard risk in 49 (47.6%), high-risk in 39 (37.9%) and unknown in 15 (14.6%) patients. Most 75 (72.8%) patients were MRD positive, 16 (15.5%) were MRD negative, and 12 (11.7%) borderline. The median main MRD clone detected was 64 (range 0-91,874). 70 patients (68%) and 33 (32%) had a negative and positive PET/CT respectively. The median follow-up time was 18 months (range, 13-31 months). At the time of data analysis, 10 patients (9.7%) had relapsed and only 4 (3.9%) had died. There was a high-correlation between MRD status and PET/CT, 31 patients (93.9%) with positive PET/CT were also MRD positive (p=0.0027). There were no statistical differences between PET/CT and CyR (p=0.95). We analyzed the correlation using the FREQ procedure (McNemars's test); there was a strong association between positive PET/CT and positive MRD in 31/33 patients (93.9%, high sensitivity), and low association for negative PET/CT the negative/borderline MRD in 26/70 (37.1%, low specificity; p&lt;0.001). The agreement measure between the PET/CT and MRD using negative/borderline combined had a kappa of 0.23 (95% CI 0.11, 0.35) indicating a fair agreement beyond chance (Figure 1). PET/CT-CT was a statistically significant predictor of worse RFS (HR 3.53, 95%CI: 1.02-12.24, p&lt;0.0337) and OS (HR 11.38, 95%CI: 1.18-109.56, p&lt;0.0078) (Figure 2-3, respectively). MRD was not predictive of neither RFS (HR 1.72, 95%CI: 0.36-8.14, p&lt;0.49) or OS (p&lt;0.16). Conclusions: In conclusion, we demonstrate that the combination of MRD by NGS (clonoSEQ ®) and PET/CT at day 100 are complementary and have a high sensitivity (true positive rate) and fair correlation of agreement but low specificity (true negative rate). PET/CT was the best most sensitive technique to prognosticate RFS and OS. We did not find prognostic correlation of MRD with RFS and OS. However, our findings might be confounded by the low risk of relapse and death, a longer follow-up may demonstrate clinically important differences. Our results add evidence that MRD plus PET/CT improve the definition of CR in MM patients post ASCT. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate the optimal timing and role of combined MRD, PET/CT with other prognostic markers of clinical outcomes. Disclosures Larsen: Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fonseca:Juno: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Aduro: Consultancy; OncoTracker: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document