Dasatinib Drug Use Results Surveys For All Cases As Nationwide Real World Data

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1502-1502
Author(s):  
Yasuhito Nannya ◽  
Kiyohiko Hatake ◽  
Mineo Kurokawa ◽  
Mihoko Nishizawa ◽  
Jumpei Tetsuka ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Dasatinib is a BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor that was approved in Japan in January 2009 for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). This study was aimed to acquire the background information on the patients treated with dasatinib and early data related to safety and efficacy, which would provide important information to ensure the appropriate use of dasatinib. Methods We conducted the nation-wide surveillance for all the patients who used dasatinib for 3 years after starting this medicine. The target number of patients was 800. The principal aims of the survey were to identify: (1) unknown adverse drug reactions, (2) the circumstances under which adverse drug reactions occur in real-world use of the drug, and (3) the factors that may affect safety and efficacy. Especially, we focused on the circumstances of development and incidences of bone marrow depression/cytopenia, hemorrhage, fluid retention, cardiovascular events and abnormal electrocardiogram (QT prolongation), hepatobiliary disorders, and interstitial lung diseases. Results This survey included 903 evaluable subjects for whom survey sheets have been returned to date, June 27, 2012. The composition of the registered cases was: chronic-phase CML 375, accelerated-phase CML 80, blastic-phase CML 133, Ph+ ALL 312, and others 3. Median age was 62 years (range, 7-92) in the chronic-phase CML group, 63.5 years (range, 9-84) in the accelerated-phase group, 63 years (range, 18-86) in the blastic-phase CML group, and 60 years (range, 5-92) in the Ph+ ALL group. 879 patients were previously treated with imatinib. The proportion of imatinib resistant to imatinib intolerant (resistant/ intolerant) in chronic-phase CML was 57.6%/42.4%, in accelerated-phase CML was 84.0%/16.0%, in blastic-phase CML was 78.4%/21.6%, and in Ph+ ALL was 65.1%/34.9%. The median treatment duration (days) was 414 in the chronic-phase CML group, 303.5 in the accelerated-phase CML group, 81 in the blastic-phase CML group, and 96.5 in the Ph+ ALL group. The frequent adverse drug reactions (10% or more) were thrombocytopenia 45.7%, anemia 36.7%, leucopenia 30.7%, pleural effusion 28.0%, and neutropenia 23.8% (all grades). The incidence of bone marrow depression/cytopenia was 56.1%, hemorrhage 10.7%, fluid retention 37.1%, cardiovascular events and abnormal electrocardiogram 4.5%, hepatobiliary disorders 20.4%, and interstitial lung diseases 3.5%. The incidences of bone marrow depression/cytopenia, hemorrhage, and fluid retention in chronic-phase CML were 49.6%, 5.9%, and 28.8%, respectively, and tended to be lower than in the other phases (accelerated phase and blastic phase CML and Ph+ ALL). Additionally, we will report the intervals before the onset of adverse drug reactions, the circumstances of continuation of administration, and factors that appear to affect safety or efficacy based on the latest data update. Conclusions The information in this all-case drug use results survey will be useful to ensure the appropriate use of dasatinib in real-world patients. Disclosures: Kurokawa: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Nishizawa:Bristol-Myers K.K.: Employment. Tetsuka:Bristol-Myers K.K.: Employment. Meiji:Bristol-Myers K.K.: Employment. Hiroshi:Bristol-Myers K.K.: Employment.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3276-3276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupriya Agarwal ◽  
Ryan Mackenzie ◽  
Dorian LaTocha ◽  
Kavin Vasudevan ◽  
Eduardo Firpo ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3276 Poster Board III-1 Background: Several studies have indicated that BCR-ABL causes cell cycle defects by interfering with the cell cycle regulatory functions of p27, a Cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor and tumor suppressor. Studies in BCR-ABL positive cell lines have shown that BCR-ABL promotes proteasomal degradation of p27 in a pathway that involves the SCFSKP2 ubiquitin ligase, while cytoplasmic mislocalization has been described in primary CML cells. It has been suggested that the principal effect of this cytoplasmic mislocalization is to remove p27 from the nucleus, thereby relieving Cdks from p27 inhibition. However, recent studies have shown that a p27 mutant (p27CK-), that cannot bind to Cdks or Cyclins, actively contributes to oncogenesis. This raises the question as to whether cytoplasmic mislocalization of p27 in CML cells may in fact promote leukemogenesis rather than merely compromise Cdk inhibition. We therefore hypothesized that the net contribution of p27 in CML is to promote leukemogenesis due to the oncogenic activity of cytoplasmic p27. Experimental approach and results: We determined p27 localization in BCR-ABL positive cell lines and CD34+ progenitor cells from newly diagnosed chronic phase CML patients (N=7) and from CML patients in blast crisis (N=2) by immunoblotting of nuclear and cytoplasmic cellular fractions. We found that p27 is predominantly cytoplasmic in most CML cell lines and in CD34+ cells from 8/9 (89%) patient samples, including patients in blastic phase. Cytoplasmic localization of p27 in CD34+ cells from CML patients was also confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis. Further, we observed that inhibition of BCR-ABL kinase by imatinib, an Abl kinase inhibitor increased nuclear p27 in all cell lines tested and in 4/9 patient samples (3/7 chronic phase and 1/2 blastic phase samples). However, we did not observe a substantial change in the cytoplasmic p27 levels. Similar results were obtained in Ba/F3 and 32D murine hematopoietic cell lines expressing BCR-ABL when compared with the respective parental cells. Further, SKP2 was up-regulated in CD34+ cell from CML patients as compared to the normal patients consistent withSKP2 mediated down-regulation of nuclear p27. These data suggest that nuclear but not cytoplasmic p27 levels are predominantly regulated by BCR-ABL kinase activity. To test whether p27 is crucial for BCR-ABL-driven leukemia, we compared leukemogenesis between recipients of BCR-ABL transduced p27+/+ and p27-/- bone marrow. Mice transplanted with BCR-ABL infected p27-/- marrow had significantly longer median survival (70 days, range 48-150 days) compared to recipients of p27+/+ marrow (37 days, range 14-56 days) (p=0.0123). To exclude that this difference was related to the differences in homing and engraftment capabilities of p27+/+ and p27-/- bone marrow cells, we compared short term homing and long term engraftment of p27+/+ and p27-/- bone marrow cells transplanted into wild-type recipients and found no differences. These data suggest that the net contribution of p27 to BCR-ABL-mediated leukemogenesis is positive. Further, to investigate the contribution of nuclear p27 to leukemogenesis, we utilized marrow from p27S10A mice in the murine CML model. In p27S10A mice, p27 is nuclear to to abrogation of the phosphorylation site implicated in nuclear export. We injected BCR-ABL transduced bone marrow cells of p27S10A and p27+/+ mice into wild-type recipients and compared the disease progression. We observed that mice transplanted with BCR-ABL infected p27S10A marrow had significantly longer median survival (28 days, range 23-79 days) compared to the recipients of p27+/+ marrow (23 days, range 21-38 days) (p=0.0139). This data is consistent with nuclear tumor suppressor function of p27. Combined with the data above, this suggests that cytoplasmic p27 promotes BCR-ABL mediated leukemogenesis. Conclusions: Our data suggest that though nuclear p27 functions as a tumor suppressor, the net contribution of p27 in CML might be oncogenic due to an oncogenic role of the increased cytoplasmic p27. Restoring nuclear p27 or reducing cytoplasmic p27 may be therapeutically useful in malignancies with low nuclear and high cytoplasmic p27 expression. Disclosures: Druker: OHSU patent #843 - Mutate ABL Kinase Domains: Patents & Royalties; MolecularMD: Equity Ownership; Roche: Consultancy; Cylene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Calistoga Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Avalon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ambit Biosciences: Consultancy; Millipore via Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Patents & Royalties; Novartis, ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Deininger:Genzyme: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad : Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Christian Gessner ◽  
Karin Potthoff ◽  
Nikolaj Frost

<b><i>Background/Aim:</i></b> Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a common and serious complication in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. This analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prophylaxis with lipegfilgrastim, a glycoPEGylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in real-world clinical practice. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data from two European non-interventional studies (NIS NADIR and NIS LEOS) investigating lipegfilgrastim for primary and secondary prophylaxis were pooled. Outcomes included the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN), use of anti-infectives and antimycotics, and adverse events and their relationship to lipegfilgrastim. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The safety population included 361 patients with lung cancer (median age, 66 years [range, 36–88]), of whom 322 had received 2 or more consecutive cycles of lipegfilgrastim (efficacy population [primary prophylaxis, 75.5%; secondary prophylaxis, 16.5%]). Almost 40% of the patients were considered to have a high risk (&#x3e;20%) of FN, and around 60% had an intermediate risk (10–20%). For all cycles, FN was reported in 3 patients (0.9%), neutropenia in 14 (4.3%), and grade 4 neutropenia in 9 (2.8%). Anti-infectives were used in 27 patients (8.4%) and antimycotics in 6 (1.9%). The incidence rates were lower for the patients’ first cycle (FN, 0.4%; neutropenia, 0.8%; grade 4 neutropenia, 0.8%; anti-infectives, 0.6%; antimycotics, 0.6%). Adverse drug reactions considered lipegfilgrastim related were reported in 35 patients (9.7%), and serious adverse drug reactions in 10 (2.8%). None of the fatal events reported in 28 patients (7.8%) were lipegfilgrastim related. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Lipegfilgrastim administered to patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy in real-world clinical practice showed similar effectiveness and safety to that reported in published pivotal trials.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3160-3160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Verena Sophia Hoffmann ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Susanne Saussele ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Most of the knowledge about treatments and outcome of CML patients originates from clinical studies. To get new and unbiased insights in the epidemiology, treatment and outcome of CML, the EUTOS population-based registry of newly diagnosed CML patients was established, - as part of the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) for CML. The aim was to collect the data of all adults with newly diagnosed CML, irrespective of treatment and of enrolment in studies. Patients and Methods: The EUTOS population-based registry collected data of newly diagnosed CML patients, 18 years or older, over a specified period of time from 2008 till 2012 living in defined regions. The data were collected by 22 study groups in 20 European countries. Data were gathered via a web-based CRF-system. For comparison we used the already published data from five Company-sponsored registration studies IRIS (O’Brien et.all, NEJM, 2003), TOPS (Cortes et al, JCO, 2009) ENESTnd (Saglio et al, NEJM, 2010), DASISION (Kantarjian et al, NEJM, 2010) and BELA (Cortes et al, JCO, 2012), from three Investigator-sponsored studies GIMEMA (Castagnetti et al, JCO, 2010 and Gugliotta et al, Blood, 2011), French SPIRIT (Preudhomme et al, NEJM, 2010) and German CML IV (Hehlmann et al, JCO, 2011) and from two single referral centers HAMMERSMITH (De Lavallade et al, JCO, 2008) and MDA (Jain et al, Blood, 2013). Results: Till 15.05.2014 2978 patients were registered in the EUTOS Population-based registry. 94.3% of the patients were diagnosed in chronic phase (CP), 3.6% in accelerated phase (AP), and 2.2% in blastic phase (BP). For the calculation of the prognostic scores 361 patients had to be excluded because they were pretreated. For the comparison we used 2350 patients in Chronic Phase with laboratory values before any treatment. 54% of the patients in the EUTOS Population-based registry were male, less than in all studies (56.6 - 60.6%). The median age at diagnosis was 56 years, higher than in all studies (46 - 55). In EUTOS the proportion of patients more than 60 years and more than 65 years old was 40.4 % and 21.9 % respectively. Similar data were rarely reported in all other studies. Median value of the spleen size below costal margin was 0. 46.1% of the patients had a palpable spleen and 15.2% had a spleen size ≥ 10 (spleen size is always reported in cm under costal margin in this abstract). The % of palpable spleen is only reported by IRIS, 25.0% and by the FRENCH Spirit group, 49.8%. The median spleen is only reported by GIMEMA, 2.0. Spleen size ≥ 10 is reported by IRIS, 6.0%, ENESTnd, 12.4% and HAMMERSMITH 25.5%. While the median values for Platelets and Hemoglobin show no big differences, the median WBC in EUTOS is 83.9 x109/l and in the Company-sponsored registration studies: IRIS 18-20 x109/l , in ENESTnd 23-26 x109/l, in DASISION 23-25 x109/l , and in BELA 22-23 x109/l, in the Investigator-sponsored studies: GIMEMA 55 x109/l , in the FRENCH SPIRIT 83-104 x109/l , in the GERMAN CML IV 75-91 x109/l , and in the single referral center study HAMMERSMITH 140 x109/l, clearly indicating that in company-sponsored, registration studies, the reported values of the WBC were not recorded prior to any treatment. The median values for Blasts, Basophils and Eosinophils show also not so big differences. The % of Sokal low risk patients is in EUTOS with 34.5% lower than in all studies (35.2 - 60%) with the exception of HAMMERSMITH 28.9%. Discussion: The EUTOS Population-based registry provides the first European wide real-world series of patients with newly diagnosed Ph+, BCR-ABL+ CML. The age and sex distribution and some baseline characteristics such as Sokal Score as well as median WBC count in the EUTOS population-based registry are different from many prospective studies. This should be taken in due consideration before extrapolating the results of treatment studies to real life. Spleen size, which is known as an important value for prediction, is only very rarely reported in clinical studies. With further follow-up, this registry will provide a population-based insight on treatment, survival, and causes of death. Disclosures Baccarani: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Hoffmann:Novartis: Research Funding. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Steegmann:Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mayer:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zaritskey:Novartis: Consultancy. Clark:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Porkka:BMS: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hehlmann:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Hasford:Novartis: Research Funding. Lindoerfer:Novartis: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3434-3434
Author(s):  
Jenny Byrne ◽  
Joanne Ewing ◽  
Adam J. Mead ◽  
Heather Oakervee ◽  
Gavin Campbell ◽  
...  

Background: The prognosis of patients with chronic-phase myeloid leukaemia (CML) has drastically improved with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). During the period of this study, availability of treatment options in the UK were limited and determined by the date reimbursement was granted and when restrictions on the use of individual licensed TKIs were removed. Currently, imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib are reimbursed for 1st line treatment (1L) with bosutinib and ponatinib reimbursed for 2nd line or subsequent lines of treatment. Aims: The primary aim was to determine the sequence of 2nd generation (2G) TKIs (nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib) in patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML who had received their 3rd and subsequent lines of TKIs in a real world UK setting. Methods: A multi-centre, retrospective, chart review was undertaken in the UK from November 2018 to July 2019. To be included, patients had to be aged ≥18 with chronic phase Ph+ CML who had started a third line of TKI treatment between June 2013 and February 2018. Patients were excluded if they had &gt;3-month gap in treatment before progression or relapse, or were treated with a 2G TKI within an interventional clinical study during third line treatment. At each line, molecular responses, cytogenetic responses, duration of therapy and reasons for stopping were recorded until the date of last hospital follow-up or death. Overall survival was determined from date of initiation of 3rd or 4th line TKI therapy until death by any cause. Results: An interim analysis was undertaken for 65 patients from 11 sites. Median age at diagnosis was 53.0 years. 50.8% were male and 49.2% were female. Of these 65 patients, 48 patients were still being treated at the end of observation (29 patients in 3rd, 18 in 4th and 1 in 5th line). Patient demographics are typical of CML populations. Throughout the study, imatinib was 1L treatment of choice for the majority of patients (57/65; 88%) and this held true (21/22; 95%) even when nilotinib and dasatinib were reimbursed for use 1L. Nilotinib was most commonly prescribed in 2L (42/65; 56%), reflecting the greater availability of this drug during the study period. Dasatinib and bosutinib constituted 22% and 4% respectively of 2L treatments. The most frequent sequencing pathway observed was I1-N2-D3 (Table 1, Fig. 1). 19 other pathways at low frequencies were observed across 39 patients. 97% of patients (63/65) achieved an optimal response at any time as defined by the 2013 ELN guidelines (Table 2) during the observation period. Of the 31 (48%) patients who were resistant to 1L, 24 (37%) achieved a response in 2L and of the 7 (10.7%) patients who were resistant to 1L and 2L, 5 (7.7%) achieved a response in 3L. At the end of the observation period, only 2 (3%) patients never achieved a response. In 3L: 29 (45%) patients are still ongoing, 4 died, 3 were lost to follow up and 3 underwent transplantation. In 4L: 18 (69%) are still ongoing, 3 died, and 3 underwent transplantation. Median overall survival for L3 was 21 months and 12 months in L4. In all lines of treatment, the main cause of switching away from imatinib was lack of efficacy (61%), and for all 2G TKIs the main cause was intolerance (66%). During the period when only imatinib was available in 1L, median duration of 1L treatment was longer at 26 months for patients failing to respond vs 9 months when nilotinib and dasatinib were also available. Conclusions: In this UK real-world study, for patients requiring 3 or more lines of treatment, sequencing of TKIs may have been determined by drug reimbursement. As availability of TKIs increased, time to switch therapy decreased for all patients, suggesting that clinicians were following guidelines and switching treatments more readily. However, initial 1L prescribing behaviour has not changed in this observation period despite better access to 2G TKI, and there appears to be a trend of physicians preferring to repeat 2G TKIs treatment sequences that yield a favourable outcome. Disclosures Byrne: Ariad/Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ewing:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship ; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship . Mead:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodation expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy; CTI: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Oakervee:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Honoraria. Campbell:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Educational support; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Educational support; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Other: Educational support; Roche: Other: Educational support; Celgene: Other: Educational support. Amott:Celgene: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship . Goringe:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Speaker. Heartin:Celgene: Other: Speaker's fees; Janssen: Other: Speaker's fees; Takeda: Other: Speaker's fees; Alexion: Other: Speaker's fees; Novartis: Other: Speaker's fees. Dimitriadou:Celgene: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship . Arami:Takeda: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship ; Gilead: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship ; Roche: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship ; Celgene: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship . Neelakantan:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Frewin:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship ; AbbVie: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship . Pillai:Celgene: Honoraria. De Lavallade:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cross:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy. Thompson:Incyte: Employment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A. Kalra ◽  
Sunil Bhandari ◽  
Michael Spyridon ◽  
Rachel Davison ◽  
Sarah Lawman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intravenous iron is often used to treat iron deficiency anaemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD), but the optimal dosing regimen remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of high- versus low-dose intravenous iron isomaltoside on the probability of retreatment with intravenous iron in iron-deficient ND-CKD patients. Methods This real-world, prospective, observational study collected data from 256 ND-CKD patients treated for anaemia in the UK. Following an initial course of iron isomaltoside, patients were followed for ≥12 months. Iron dose and the need for retreatment were determined at the investigators’ discretion. The primary study outcome was the need for retreatment at 52 weeks compared between patients who received >1000 mg of iron during Course 1 and those who received ≤1000 mg. Safety was evaluated through adverse drug reactions. Results The probability of retreatment at Week 52 was significantly lower in the >1000 mg iron group (n = 58) versus the ≤1000 mg group (n = 198); hazard ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]): 0.46 (0.20, 0.91); p = 0.012. Mean (95% CI) haemoglobin increased by 6.58 (4.94, 8.21) g/L in the ≤1000 mg group and by 10.59 (7.52, 13.66) g/L in the >1000 mg group (p = 0.024). Changes in other blood and iron parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Administering >1000 mg of iron isomaltoside saved 8.6 appointments per 100 patients compared to ≤1000 mg. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. Of the patients who received ≤1000 mg of iron in this study, 82.3% were eligible for a dose >1000 mg. Conclusions The >1000 mg iron isomaltoside regimen reduced the probability of retreatment, achieved a greater haemoglobin response irrespective of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment, and reduced the total number of appointments required, compared to the ≤1000 mg regimen. Many of the patients who received ≤1000 mg of iron were eligible for >1000 mg, indicating that there was considerable underdosing in this study. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02546154, 10 September 2015.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra L. Kane-Gill ◽  
Nicholas P. Wytiaz ◽  
Lisa M. Thompson ◽  
Karina Muzykovsky ◽  
Mitchell S. Buckley ◽  
...  

Prescribing appropriate doses of drugs requiring weight-based dosing is challenging in overweight patients due to a lack of data. With 68% of the US population considered overweight and these patients being at an increased risk for hospitalization, clinicians need guidance on dosing weight-based drugs. The purpose of this study was to identify “real-world” dose ranges of high-risk medications administered via continuous infusion requiring weight-based dosing and determine the reasons for dosing changes (ineffectiveness or adverse drug reactions). A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted in four intensive care units at three institutions. A total of 857 medication orders representing 11 different high-risk medications in 173 patients were reviewed. It was noted that dosing did not increase in proportion to weight classification. Overall, 14 adverse drug reactions occurred in nine patients with more in overweight patients (9 of 14). A total of 75% of orders were discontinued due to ineffectiveness in groups with higher body mass indexes. Ineffectiveness leads to dosing adjustments resulting in the opportunity for medication errors. Also, the frequent dosing changes further demonstrate our lack of knowledge of appropriate dosing for this population. Given the medications’ increased propensity to cause harm, institutions should aggressively monitor these medications in overweight patients.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4821-4821
Author(s):  
Mustafa Yenerel ◽  
Reyhan Diz-Kucukkaya ◽  
Naciye Demirel ◽  
Mesut Ayer ◽  
Selim Yavuz ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim: Effectiveness of imatinib in CML was evaluated on a cohort of 104 patients with a median 29 months of observation time, recruited between 3/2002 and 2/2006. Patients and methods: 104 patients diagnosed as having CML between 1990–2006 were included in this study. Their median age was 44 years (19–77) and 55% of patients were male. Imatinib was used in a dose of 400mg/day for chronic phase and 600mg/day for accelerated and blastic phase. In chronic phase patients with no cytogenetic response in 1 year and in accelerated or blastic phase patients with no hematologic response in 3 months, doses were increased to 600mg/day and 800 mg/day respectively. Interferon (IFN) treatment had been used as α-IFN 5 MIU/m2 daily combined with or without monthly courses of cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) 20 mg/m2 for 10 days in 50 patients before imatinib. Cytogenetic response (CR) was monitored on bone marrow metaphases collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months during the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. CR was quantified by 20 metaphases Ph in bone marrow: 0% as complete (CCR), 1–35% major as (MjCR) and &gt; 95% as imatinib failure. Molecular response followed by PCR in bone marrow samples. We stratified the patients according to previous IFN treatment in two groups. CML patients who were treated with imatinib as a first line therapy were analyzed as Group I. Other patients who were treated initially with IFN and ara-C and those were switched to imatinib because of intolerance or unresponsiveness were accepted as Group II. Results: Age, sex distribution and disease phases of both groups were quite similar. Therapy responses are summarized in Table 1. Hematological response (HR) was seen in 90,4 % of the patients (94/104) in median 54 days (11–149) for Group I and 41 days (15–193) for Group II. There wasn’t any difference according to the time elapsed for HR (p=0,79). Cytogenetic data were interesting in our patients. As a total result, CR were achieved in 77,8 % of the patients in median 5,1 months (84 days– 2,7 years). CR rate was significantly higher in Group I (p=0.019). When we compared two groups according to early cytogenetic response in first 6 months, Group I had also much better results (p=0.049). CCR were achieved 35,6 % of the patients (37/104) and there wasn’t any difference between the groups (p=0,25). Molecular response was achieved in 19,2% of the patients followed by PCR (19/87) and there was no significant difference (p=0,15). We conclude that imatinib is highly effective as a first line agent in CML patients. Advanced disease age probably is the most important factor for the lower response rates in the second group. But, the role of previous IFN therapy should also be questioned. As a summary, imatinib should be used in every CML patient without any delay in order to get higher and sooner CR. Tablo 1. Imatinib response of the 104 patients with CML. HR (p=0.89) CR (p=0.019) MjCR in 6 months(p=0.049) CCR(p=0.25) Mol. Response(p=0,15) Imatinibfailure (p=0.03) Imatinib Follow-up Group I 90,7% (49/54) 77,8% (42/54) 57,4% (31/54) 40,7% (22/54) 30% (12/40) 22,2% (12/54) 22,1 months (3,7 months -3,5 yrs) Group II 88% (44/50) 56% (28/50) 38% (19/50) 30% (15/50) 17% (8/47) 40% (20/50) 3 years (9months-5,1 yrs)


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1867-1867
Author(s):  
David Bowen ◽  
Alex Smith ◽  
Jackie Droste ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Argyris Symeonidis ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1867 Background: The European LeukemiaNet MDS Registry programme is the largest and most comprehensive prospective population-based registry of ‘low-risk’ MDS patients followed from diagnosis. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to describe the demographics and the disease-management of newly diagnosed MDS patients within IPSS low and intermediate-1 categories. Methods: The project recruits patients from 107 sites in 11 countries, ranging from 2–25 sites per country and including a high proportion of non-University centres in small cities. Consecutive eligible adult patients are registered within 3 months of diagnosis. Local diagnosis is accepted and a large dataset is collected including laboratory data, clinical information (including co-morbidity and concomitant medication) plus health utility (EQ-5D). Data are entered via a web portal and are source verified by study monitoring visits to sites. Results: As of July 2010, 828 patients are registered; data are presented for the first 800 patients. Recruitment is highest from France (n=237) then UK (104), Greece (99), Spain (92), and Sweden (73). Median age is 74.2 yrs (range 18.7–95.3) and from the four largest recruiting countries is 74.6–77.1 yrs. Sixty one percent of patients are male. Twenty patients are non-Caucasian (n=763). Body mass index is overweight (WHO definition) in 43.4% pts and obese in 18.3%, comparable to WHO data for the general adult population (http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp). RCMD is the largest WHO subgroup (34%), followed by RARS (19%), RA (18.4%), RAEB-1 (12.5%), del5q (5.4%), MDS-U (3.5%) and RAEB-2 (0.5%). All WHO subgroups have male predominance except del5q with a striking female excess (79%). IPSS score (n=743) is 0 (52.3%), 0.5 (33.2%), and 1 (14.4%). 84.5% patients have IPSS ‘good’ cytogenetics. 19% patients have 0 cytopenias, 53% 1 cytopenia, 20% 2 cytopenias and 8% 3 cytopenias. WPSS category (with transfusion dependence assessed at time of registration, n=727) is Very Low (35.5%), Low (39.5%), Intermediate (21%), High (4%). Bone marrow features: mean no. of dysplastic lineages = 1.9, bone marrow ring sideroblasts percent = 0 (60% pts), <15 (11.5%), ≥15<50 (19.2%), ≥50 (9.6%). Median haemoglobin (Hb) concentration at presentation is 10.1 g/dl; 36% values were < 10 g/dl and 10% < 8 g/dl. Hb decreased with age (categorical variable Hb. <13>11.5, <11.5>10, <10; Χ2 test, P<.0001). Mean neutrophil count was 2.8 × 109/l with 27% values <1.5 × 109/l, 16% < 1 × 109/l, and 5% < 0.5 × 109/l. Median platelet count was 184 × 109/l; 5% patients had values < 50 × 109/l and 3% < 20 × 109/l. Platelet count and neutrophil count did not change with age. Median serum erythropoietin (EPO) concentration (n=418) was 49 IU/l, 81% values were <200 IU/l and 7% > 500 IU/l. Mean creatinine clearance was 71 mls/min with a marked reduction with age (P<.0001). Baseline serum EPO correlated with Hb. (r=.37, P<.0001), creatinine clearance (r=.22, P<.0001) and age (r=.1, P<.0001). The relationship between creatinine clearance, baseline EPO and response to EPO therapy will be explored. Discussion: This registry records data from the ‘real world’, namely what the hematopathologists in 100 sites diagnose locally as low-risk MDS and will as such be managed as MDS. Median age is consistent with other population-based data (US Medicare, Yorkshire Haematological Malignancy Research Network [www.hmrn.org]). In comparison with registries from specialist MDS centres, median age is higher and a lower proportion have del(5q) WHO subtype. Conclusion: The ELN registry clearly maps the diagnosis and management of low-risk MDS in routine clinical practice in hospitals large and small, specialist and non-specialist and is a unique resource. Acknowledgments: The Steering Committee (SC) acknowledges the commitment and enthusiasm from all 107 sites contributing high quality data to the project. The SC is also grateful for the funding commitment of Novartis Oncology Europe through the University of Nijmegen. Disclosures: Bowen: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AMGEN: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; ROCHE: Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hellstrom-Lindberg:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 672-672
Author(s):  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Jianqin Shan ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 672 Background The favorable results of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; nilotinib, dasatinib) in frontline therapy of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) positive-CML may establish them as new standards in frontline therapy. This depends on the maturing data with the long-term endpoints of PFS and EFS. Different definitions are used to define “progression” and “event” in different studies. This may result in perceived but not real differences in outcomes with various TKIs when comparing trials. In addition, multi-institutional sponsored trial designs may compound the variable definitions: 1) patients taken off study for occurrences other than the defined “progression” or “event” (eg toxicity, intolerance, other) are censored at the time they are off therapy and not coded for progression/event/death once they are off TKI; and 2) such studies have limited capacities to follow up patients for progression/event after they are off drug therapy for more than 30–60 days. Single institutional studies have a potential advantage of continuing to monitor patients for progression/events after they are off the particular protocol TKI. Study Aim To analyze the impact of differences in the definitions of PFS and EFS used in the IRIS, ENEST-nd, DASISION, and M.D. Anderson (MDACC) trials on outcome, when these definitions are applied to patients with newly diagnosed CML treated with TKIs on MDACC studies. Patients and Methods 435 patients (July 2000-April 2010) with early chronic phase Ph-positive CML treated with imatinib (n=281), nilotinib (n=78), and dasatinib (n=76)were analyzed for outcome using different definitions. Definitions were: 1) PFS- ENEST: progression = accelerated or blastic phase (AP-BP) on nilotinib/imatinib therapy + CML related death on nilotinib/imatinib therapy or within 30 days off therapy; 2) EFS-IRIS: event = progression to AP-BP on imatinib + death of any cause on imatinib + loss of CHR or major CG response; 3) PFS-DASISION: progression = EFS-IRIS definition + WBC increase to more than 20; deaths are coded on dasatinib and within 60 days off dasatinib; 4) EFS MDACC: event = progression to AP-BP + loss of major CG response +resistance/loss of CHR/lack of achievement of response by ELN criteria + off for toxicity + death from any cause on or off therapy (if not counted prior to death as progression/event). Results The median follow-up is 67 months (2-116). Of the 435 patients treated, 312 (72%) remain on TKI therapy; 123 (28%) were taken off for the following reasons: resistance/loss of response n = 33; blastic phase on TKI therapy n=6; intolerance/toxicity n= 29; other causes n = 55. Reasons off for the latter 55 patients are: lost to follow – up (n=14); non-compliance (n=11); financial issues (n=8): intercurrent illness (n=7); patient choice (n=5); referral to SCT in chronic phase (n=2); and death from non-CML cause (n=8: 1 complications of surgery, 2 old age, 1 CHF, 1 pneumonia, 2 car accident/suicide, 1 cardiac infarction). So far, 33 patients (7.6%) have died; 8 while on TKI therapy (none from CML; detailed earlier); 2 within 60 days off TKIs (1 AML, 1 renal cancer); and 23 off TKIs for > 60 days. Deaths in the latter 23 were from: 10 post resistance/relapse/BP (accounted for as event/resistance at time off TKI); 10 taken off for toxicity/intolerance (censored at time off; 8 deaths later from CML, 1 post SCT, 1 unknown); 4 off for other illness/non-compliance/lost to FU/pt choice (3 deaths later from CML; 1 from other). Thus, of the 33 deaths, only 19 (8 deaths on TKI + 2 deaths within 60 days + 9 off for resistance/relapse/BP) would be counted as progression/events on the IRIS/ENEST/DASISION studies while 14 would be censored at time off TKI. Based on these 4 definitions, the number of progression/events were: PFS-ENEST 26 progressions; EFS-IRIS 40 events; PFS-DASISION 43 progression/events; EFS-MDACC 76 events. The corresponding 5-year PFS EFS rates were 93%, 90%, 89%, and 81%. (Figure) Conclusions With the importance of EFS and PFS in determining whether new TKIs are better than imatinib in frontline therapy, precise and common definitions of these endpoints across randomized clinical trials and single institutional trials are needed. Randomized multi-institutional trials may not collect accurately all events after patients are off TKI therapy for 30–60 days. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. O'Brien:Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Kadia:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cortes:Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document