Clonal Evolution As Determined By Sequential Bone Marrow Karyotype Analysis During JAK Inhibitor Therapy For Myelofibrosis: Impact On Treatment Response and Overall and Leukemia-Free Survival

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2821-2821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramy A. Abdelrahman ◽  
Kebede Begna ◽  
Darci Zblewski ◽  
Aref Al-Kali ◽  
Mrinal M. Patnaik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clonal Evolution ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Support Service ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Leukemic Transformation ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background While unfavorable karyotype at referral is associated with significantly inferior overall and leukemia-free survival in myelofibrosis (MF) patients (Blood. 2011 Oct 27;118(17):4595), the incidence of clonal evolution during JAK inhibitor (JAKi) treatment and its clinical significance are not currently known. We conducted a sponsor-independent, single-center retrospective analysis examining the phenotypic correlates and prognostic impact of clonal evolution during JAKi treatment. Methods Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data were collected on MF patients treated with one or more JAKi on a clinical trial at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Baseline data pertained to the onset of treatment with first JAKi. Karyotype risk categories were as previously defined (Blood. 2011 Oct 27;118(17):4595). Serial bone marrow biopsies were obtained at varying frequencies based on individual JAKi protocol requirements. Mutation screening was performed as previously described (Leukemia. 2013 Apr 26. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.119). Information on survival and leukemic transformation was updated in July 2013. Results A total of 157 MF patients were studied (60% male; median age 65 years, range 34-89 years). The DIPSS-plus distribution was: Low/Int-1 20 (13%), Int-2 66 (42%), and High 71 (45%). The first JAKi was momelotinib (CYT387) in 79 patients (50%), ruxolitinib in 51 (33%) and fedratinib (SAR302503) in 27 (17%). Median follow up from first JAKi treatment was 30 months (range 1-67 months); during this period, 72 deaths (46%) and 14 (9%) leukemic transformations were documented. Eighty nine patients (57%) had a median total 3 (range 2-8) bone marrow biopsies with karyotype analysis during JAKi treatment. Of these, 21 patients (24%) showed clonal evolution (ie, acquisition or loss of one or more chromosome abnormalities when comparing last observed karyotype during JAKi treatment to baseline). Overall, 13 patients (15%) had upstaging of karyotype risk category (eg, normal to unfavorable), 9 (10%) had downstaging (eg, favorable to normal) and 67 (75%) had no change. Acquisition of worse-than-baseline karyotype was significantly higher in DIPSS-plus high-risk patients (26%) versus non-high risk patients (6%) (p=0.03). There was no association between acquisition of a worse karyotype category and baseline karyotype risk category or ASXL1 or SRSF2 mutation status. There was borderline association with RBC transfusion-dependence and constitutional symptoms at baseline (p=0.06). There was no relationship between clonal evolution and achievement of spleen or anemia response during JAKi treatment (p>0.05). The median overall survival of the entire cohort was 41 months. On univariate analysis, overall survival was significantly worse in patients who acquired a worse-than-baseline karyotype risk category during JAKi treatment (n=13, 77% deaths, median survival=31 months) versus those who did not (n=76, 43% deaths, median survival=52 months) (p=0.01) (Figure). On multivariate analysis, the prognostic significance of acquiring a worse karyotype risk category was maintained against all individual DIPSS-plus prognostic variables, including baseline karyotype risk category, except age >65 years. On univariate analysis, leukemia-free survival was significantly worse in patients who acquired a worse-than-baseline karyotype risk category during JAKi treatment (n=13, 31% leukemic transformation, median leukemia-free survival=32 months) versus those who did not (n=76, 8% leukemic transformation, median leukemia-free survival not reached) (p=0.0006) (Figure). On multivariate analysis against known predictors of leukemic risk in PMF patients (ie, baseline unfavorable karyotype, SRSF1 mutated status and platelet count <100 x 109/L), only acquisition of a worse-than-baseline karyotype risk category maintained its prognostic value (HR 5.3, p=0.03) Conclusions This is the first study to examine the incidence of clonal evolution during JAKi treatment in MF patients. Approximately 25% of patients exhibited clonal evolution; acquisition of a worse-than-baseline karyotype risk category had a strong and independent association with inferior leukemia-free survival. A similar association was also observed for inferior overall survival, albeit not independent of older age. In contrast, there was no association with spleen or anemia response during JAKi treatment. Disclosures: Pardanani: Bristol Myers Squibb: Clinical trial support Other; Sanofi: Clinical trial support. Publication support service., Clinical trial support. Publication support service. Other; PharmaMar: Clinical trial support, Clinical trial support Other; JW Pharmaceutical Corp.: Clinical trial support, Clinical trial support Other.

Prognostic Indices in Older DLBCL Patients Receiving R-CHOP: An Analysis of the U.S. Intergroup Study (E4494, CALGB 9793).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 813-813
Author(s):  
R.H. Advani ◽  
H. Chen ◽  
T.M. Habermann ◽  
V.A. Morrison ◽  
E. Weller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Tool ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The U.S

Abstract Background: We reported that addition of rituximab (R) to chemotherapy significantly improves outcome in DLBCL patients (pt) &gt;60 years (JCO24:3121–27, 2006). Although the IPI is a robust clinical prognostic tool in DLBCL, Sehn et al (ASH 2005: abstract 492) reported that a revised (R) IPI more accurately predicted outcome in pt treated with rituximab-chemotherapy. Methods: We evaluated outcomes of the Intergroup study with respect to the standard IPI, R-IPI, age-adjusted (aa) IPI for evaluable pt treated with R-CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab. We further assessed a modified IPI (mIPI) using age ≥ 70 y as a cutoff rather than age 60 y. Results: The 267 pt in this analysis were followed for a median of 4 y. Pt characteristics were: age &gt; 70 (48%) (median=69), male 52%, stage III/IV 75%, &gt;1 EN site 30%, LDH elevated 60%, PS ≥2 15%. On univariate analysis all of these characteristics were significant for 3 y failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS). The IPI provided additional discrimination of risk compared to the R-IPI with significant differences in FFS and OS for 3 vs 4–5 factors. The aa-IPI defined relatively few pt as low or high risk. The impact of age was studied using a cut-off of 70 years in a modified IPI, yielding 4 risk groups as shown below. Conclusions: For pt ≥ 60 treated with rituximab-chemotherapy the distinction between 3 vs 4,5 factors in the IPI was significant.The IPI also provided additional discrimination of risk compared to the R-IPI. In this older group of pt, use of an age cutoff ≥70 y placed more patients in the low risk category. It is of interest to apply the mIPI in other datasets with DLBCL pt &gt;60 y. Group # Factors # Pt % 3y FFS* % 3y OS* *All risk groups significantly different; logrank p &lt; 0.001 **95 % CI: FFS (0.46,0.66), OS (0.58,0.78) ***95 % CI: FFS (0.21,0.45), OS (0.31,0.55) L: Low, LI: Low Intermediate, HI: High Intermediate, H; High IPI L 0–1 12 78 83 LI 2 28 70 80 HI 3 33 56** 68** H 4–5 37 33*** 43*** R-IPI Very Good 0 0 - - Good 1–2 40 72 81 Poor 3–5 60 46 57 aa-IPI L 0 12 78 83 LI 1 35 68 78 HI 2 44 47 59 H 3 9 31 35 mIPI (age ≥ 70) L 0–1 27 77 86 LI 2 28 62 74 HI 3 29 47 58 H 4–5 16 28 36

Baseline Spleen Size and Mutations Involving ASXL1 and SRSF2 Predict Survival and Treatment Response In JAK Inhibitor Treated Myelofibrosis Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4048-4048
Author(s):  
Animesh Pardanani ◽  
Ramy A Abdelrahman ◽  
Kebede Begna ◽  
Darci Zblewski ◽  
Aref Al-Kali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Spleen Size ◽  
Leukemic Transformation ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background JAK inhibitors (JAKi) currently represent a frontline treatment modality in patients with symptomatic intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF). While the efficacy of JAKi in decreasing spleen size and improving disease-related symptoms is well documented, the effect of this drug class on overall survival and risk of leukemic transformation in MF patients is less well understood, primarily due to short follow up in individual patient cohorts. Furthermore, there is scant information on baseline predictors of overall and leukemia-free survival, and also spleen and/or anemia responses, at the onset of JAKi therapy. We conducted a sponsor-independent single-center retrospective review of patients treated with JAKi with long follow up to address the aforementioned issues. Here, we report our findings regarding baseline predictors of clinical outcome and treatment response in MF patients treated with JAKi. Methods Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data were retrospectively collected on patients treated with one or more JAKi on a clinical trial at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Baseline clinical data pertained to the onset of treatment with the first JAKi. Karyotype information was available for all patients. Screening for JAK2V617F, MPLW515, ASXL1, and SRSF2 mutations was performed as previously described (Leukemia. 2013 Apr 26. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.119). Spleen size was measured by palpation by clinical investigators. Anemia and spleen responses were adjudicated as per IWG criteria (Tefferi, Blood, 2006). Information on survival and leukemic transformation was updated in July 2013. Results A total of 157 MF patients were studied (60% male; median age 65 years, range 34-89 years). Ninety seven patients (62%) had primary MF, 42 (27%) post-polycythemia vera MF, and 18 (11%) post-essential thrombocythemia MF. The DIPSS-plus distribution was: Low/Int-1 20 (13%), Int-2 66 (42%), and High 71 (45%). Other characteristics were: JAK2V617F positive 78%, unfavorable karyotype 17%, hemoglobin <10 g/dL 58%, leukocyte count >25 x 109/L 31%, platelet count <100 x 109/L 15%, peripheral blasts ≥1% 69%, red blood cell transfusion-dependent 37%, and constitutional symptoms 56%. Forty one patients (38%) were ASXL1 mutated (n=108) and 20 (18%) SRSF2 mutated (n=110). One hundred and thirty nine patients (89%) were evaluable for spleen response (median spleen size by palpation 19 cm, range 6-32 cm) and 91 (58%) for anemia response by IWG criteria. The first JAKi was momelotinib (CYT387) in 79 patients (50%), ruxolitinib in 51 (33%) and fedratinib (SAR302503) in 27 (17%). Median follow up from first JAKi treatment was 30 months (range 1-67 months); during this period, 72 deaths (46%) and 14 (9%) leukemic transformations have been documented. The median overall survival of the entire cohort was 41 months. Multivariable analysis identified the following DIPSS-plus independent predictors for survival: palpable spleen size >20 cm (HR 2.5), ASXL1 mutated status (HR 3.1) and SRSF2 mutated status (HR 3.8) (all p<0.01) (Figure). In contrast, there was no difference in survival with regards to the first JAKi used for MF treatment (p=0.3). Multivariable analysis identified the following predictors for leukemia-free survival: SRSF2 mutated (HR 9.7), unfavorable karyotype (HR 8.7), and palpable spleen size >20 cm (HR 9.1) (all p<0.01). Predictors of spleen response included baseline spleen size (≤20 cm 56%, >20 cm 34%; p=0.01), with borderline significance for ASXL1 mutation status (unmutated 51%, mutated 31%; p=0.06). Predictors of anemia response included RBC transfusion status at baseline (transfusion dependent 38%, transfusion independent 12%; p<0.01) and JAK2V617F status (unmutated 46%, mutated 22%; p=0.02). Conclusions Larger baseline spleen size and ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutated status predicted for inferior overall survival, independent of DIPSS-plus, at the onset of first JAKi treatment in MF patients. Similarly, multivariable analysis identified larger baseline spleen size and presence of unfavorable karyotype and SRSF2 mutations as being predictive for inferior leukemia-free survival. Spleen response rates were significantly superior in patients with smaller baseline spleen size and possibly ASXL1 unmutated status. Anemia response rates were significantly higher in patients who were transfusion-dependent at baseline and had JAK2V617F unmutated status. Disclosures: Pardanani: Bristol Myers Squibb: Clinical trial support Other; Sanofi: Clinical trial support, Publication support services, Clinical trial support, Publication support services Other; PharmaMar: Clinical trial support, Clinical trial support Other; JW Pharmaceutical Corp.: Clinical trial support, Clinical trial support Other. Off Label Use: Use of Ruxolitinib, Momelotinib, Fedratinib and Pomalidomide for treatment of Myelofibrosis in Clinical Trial setting.

Retrospective Comparison Of Survival and Leukemic Transformation In Myelofibrosis Patients Treated With Ruxolitinib Versus Momelotinib Versus Fedratinib Versus Pomalidomide

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4049-4049
Author(s):  
Animesh Pardanani ◽  
Ramy A. Abdelrahman ◽  
Kebede Begna ◽  
Darci Zblewski ◽  
Aref Al-Kali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Leukemic Transformation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Retrospective Comparison ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Background The impact of JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy on the natural history of myelofibrosis remains unclear. While a Phase 3 study showed that overall survival of ruxolitinib-treated intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis patients was superior as compared to placebo-treated patients, it remains unclear whether such an advantage would persist in patients receiving standard therapy, and whether this result is generalizable to other JAK inhibitors. We conducted a sponsor-independent, single-center retrospective analysis of overall and leukemia-free survival after long-term follow up in patients receiving JAKi treatment with comparison to two control populations: (i) a contemporaneously diagnosed (2005 onwards) primary myelofibrosis (PMF) patient cohort receiving standard therapy (JAKi and pomalidomide naïve); and (ii) a pomalidomide treated patient cohort (JAKi-naïve). Methods Baseline clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data were collected at the onset of study treatment with the first JAKi or pomalidomide, or at the time of first referral for patients receiving standard therapy. Information regarding bone marrow karyotype and DIPSS-plus risk status was available for all patients. Information on survival and leukemic transformation was updated in July 2013. Results The 3 patient groups were: (i) JAKi-treated: n=157, median age 65 years, range 34-89. DIPSS-plus risk: Low/Int-1 20 (13%), Int-2 66 (42%), and High 71 (45%). Median follow up from first JAKi treatment was 30 months (range 1-67 months); during this period, 72 deaths (46%) and 14 (9%) leukemic transformations were documented. The first JAKi was ruxolitinib in 51 patients (33%), momelotinib (CYT387) in 79 (50%), and fedratinib (SAR302503) in 27 (17%). The proportion of patient deaths and leukemic transformation (median follow up, range) per specific JAKi was: ruxolitinib 57% and 12% (40 months, 2-67), momelotinib 43% and 9% (29 months, 1-42), and fedratinib 33% and 4% (21 months, 2-53), respectively. (ii) Control#1 (Pomalidomide-treated): n=69, median age 67 years, range 36-87. DIPSS-plus risk: Low/Int-1 0 (0%), Int-2 28 (41%), and High 41 (59%). Median follow up was 25 months (range 2-70 months); during this period, 47 deaths (68%) and 7 (10%) leukemic transformations were documented. (iii) Control# 2 (Standard therapy): n=319, median age 66 years, range 22-90. DIPSS-plus risk: Low/Int-1 98 (31%), Int-2 122 (38%), and High 99 (31%). Median follow up from time of referral was 18 months (range 1-92 months); during this period, 101 deaths (32%) and 18 (6%) leukemic transformations were documented. For patients with Int-2 or high-risk disease (n=221), 92 deaths (42%) and 13 (6%) leukemic transformations were recorded (median follow up 16 months, range 1-92). The survival analysis focused on DIPSS-plus Int-2 and high-risk patients for all groups, reflecting the population predominantly selected for treatment on JAKi clinical trials. There was no significant difference in the median overall survival of myelofibrosis patients treated with JAKi (39 months) versus standard therapy (35 months) versus pomalidomide (26 months) (p=0.12) (Figure). The 5-year survival rates were 31%, 33% and 26%, respectively. Similarly, the median overall survival of patients treated with ruxolitinib (35 months), momelotinib (37 months) or fedratinib (42 months) was not significantly different (p=0.4). Baseline DIPSS-plus status (ie, Int-2 vs. high-risk) effectively stratified JAKi treated patients in terms of overall survival (median survival 31 vs. 60 months; p=0.0002). There was no significant difference in leukemia-free survival when comparing JAKi-treated patients versus standard therapy verus pomalidomide-treated patients (p=0.6) (Figure). The estimated 5-year risk of leukemic transformation was 17%, 12% and 13%, respectively. Conclusions With long-term follow up, myelofibrosis patients receiving JAKi therapy exhibited similar overall and leukemia-free survival as compared to two control populations (DIPSS-plus matched standard therapy and pomalidomide-treated patients). Baseline DIPSS-plus status was a powerful predictor of overall survival in JAKi treated patients. While underscoring the limitation of a non-head-to-head retrospective comparison, there was no significant difference in overall or leukemia-free survival when comparing individual JAKi drugs. Disclosures: Pardanani: Bristol Myers Squibb: Clinical trial support Other; Sanofi: Clinical trial support, Publication support services, Clinical trial support, Publication support services Other; PharmaMar: Clinical trial support, Clinical trial support Other; JW Pharmaceutical Corp.: Clinical trial support, Clinical trial support Other. Off Label Use: Use of Ruxolitinib, Momelotinib, Fedratinib and Pomalidomide for treatment of Myelofibrosis in Clinical Trial setting.

scholarly journals Very Elderly Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Phenotypic Distinctions and Prognostic Determinants of Complications and Mortality

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2572-2572
Author(s):  
Judith Jolin ◽  
Michael Harnois ◽  
Luigina Mollica ◽  
Pierre Laneuville ◽  
Robert Delage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Very Elderly ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background and methods: Increasing life expectancy has had the impact of increasing the proportion of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) aged ≥75 years (very elderly patients; VEP). However, few studies have evaluated the phenotype and prognostic factors specific to this population. This is a retrospective multicenter chart review (11 Quebec centers) of VEP with polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocytosis (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF) diagnosed between 1978 and 2019, enrolled in the CML-MPN Quebec Research Group registry. All diagnoses were made according to World Health Organization 2016 criteria (Blood. 2016;127:2391), with exemption of bone marrow biopsies in select patients. Standard statistical methods were used for all analyses. Results: Of the 753 patients studied in the registry, 114 patients (15%) were ≥75 years old (VEP) (Table 1). These subjects had a median age of 79 years (range 75-95) with incidence of PV, ET and MF of 38%, 51% and 11% respectively. Compared to patients &lt;75 years old, VEP were less likely to be male (35% vs 45%, p = 0.05), had more frequent and higher levels of leukocytosis (11.4 vs 9.7 x 10 9 / L, p &lt;0.0001), were more frequently "triple negative" and less commonly CALR-mutated (p = 0.0005), and presented significantly higher allelic burdens (45% vs 36%, p = 0.03). VEP also had more cardiovascular comorbidities (p &lt;0.0001) and were more often classified as "high risk" (86% vs. 43%, &lt;0.0001). A history of arterial thrombosis prior to/at diagnosis was more common in VEP vs younger patients (14% vs 7.2%, p = 0.02), as was a global history of arterial and/or venous thrombosis at any time during the follow up (25% vs 18%, p = 0.05). Sites of venous events were specifically skewed towards lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in VEP (75%) vs variously distributed in younger patients (p = 0.05). Bleeding rates were similar among the two groups (16% VEP and 17% non-VEP, p = 0.7) while fewer fibrotic (3% vs 8%, p = 0.03) and leukemic transformations (0 vs 2%, p = 0.04) were recorded in VEP. Significantly fewer bone marrow biopsies were performed in VEP (41% versus 54%, p = 0.01). This cohort was, however, more likely to receive cytoreductive therapy (76% vs 67%, p = 0.05), predominantly hydroxyurea (70% vs 59%, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed the presence of splenomegaly (HR 4.5; 1.2-17.1, p = 0.03) and smoking status (active/former vs never smokers) (HR 5.2; 1.1-24.9, p = 0.03) as predictors of shortened overall survival for the VEP population (Table 2). It also disclosed higher leukocyte count (p = 0.005) and the presence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.05) as significant risk factors for shortened hemorrhage-free survival. Platelet count (p = 0.03) and smoking status (p = 0.02) were found to be significant determinants of thrombosis-free survival in univariate analysis but did not maintain their significance in multivariate testing. Kaplan-Meier survival data examining age-stratified outcomes in VEP vs younger patients revealed significantly shorter overall survival in VEP (14.2 years vs not reached, p &lt; 0.0001) (Figure 1). The VEP cohort also displayed significantly reduced arterial thrombosis-free survival (incidence of 6.1% vs 3.9%, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in event data for venous thrombosis-free (4% in both, p = 0.2) and myelofibrosis-free (2.6% versus 7.8%, p = 0.6) survival. Conclusion: This data addressing VEP with MPN exposes, for the first time: i) a characteristic phenotype (predominantly female, higher leukocyte counts, higher allele burden), ii) distinct adverse outcome patterns, particularly with regard to arterial thrombosis, and iii) unique and independent prognostic factors for survival, suggesting that VEP with MPN constitute a biologically, phenotypically, and prognostically distinct population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Busque: Novartis: Consultancy. Szuber: Novartis: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Next-Generation Sequencing in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Prognostic Interaction Between Adverse Mutations and IPSS-R

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1986-1986
Author(s):  
Naseema Gangat ◽  
Terra L. Lasho ◽  
Lyla Saeed ◽  
Mythri Mudireddy ◽  
Mrinal M Patnaik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Bone Marrow Blast ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Correlates ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Abstract Background In a seminal report (NEJM 2011;30:2496), ASXL1, TP53, EZH2, ETV6 and RUNX1 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) were shown to carry an adverse prognostic impact that was independent of the international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) (Blood 1997;89:2079). Two recent studies (Leukemia20 May 2016; doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.138; Leukemia. 2014;28:241) have proposed mutation-enhanced prognostic models that include the revised IPSS (IPSS-R) (Blood 2012;120:2454 ). In the current study, we applied targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) in order to examine the prognostic interaction between adverse mutations and IPSS-R. Methods The study population was recruited from our institutional database of patients with primary MDS, based on availability of archived DNA from the time of diagnosis. The diagnosis of MDS and leukemic transformation (LT) was made according to WHO criteria (Blood. 2009;114:937). Targeted capture assays were carried out, on bone marrow DNA specimens, for the following genes: TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, ASXL1, EZH2, SUZ12, SRSF2, SF3B1, ZRSR2, U2AF1, PTPN11, Tp53, SH2B3, RUNX1, CBL, NRAS, JAK2, CSF3R, FLT3, KIT, CALR, MPL, NPM1, CEBPA, IKZF, and SETBP1.Specific variants were deemed as mutations if they are associated with a hematologic malignancy (as identified by COSMIC database), or if they have not been associated with a dbSNP. Results Patient characteristics and type and number of mutations: 179 patients were evaluated (median age 73 years; 68% males). IPSS-R risk distribution was 11% very high, 18% high, 16% intermediate, 39% low and 16% very low. At least one mutation was seen in 139 (78%) patients including 17% with one mutation, 29% with 2, 20% with 3, 10% with four, 2% with 5 and one patient with 6 mutations. The most frequent mutations were ASXL1 (30%), SF3B1 (20%), TET2 (17%), U2AF1 (16%) and SRSF2 (16%). Mutation clusters and clinical correlates: ASXL1 mutations were associated with the absence of SF3B1 (p=0.007), U2AF1 (p=0.01) and SRSF2 (p=0.003) mutations; SF3B1 with absence of U2AF1 (p=0.004) and SRSF2 (p=0.004) mutations; and U2AF1 with absence of SRSF2 mutations (p=0.01). Clinical correlates of ASXL1 mutations included older age, lower hemoglobin, and lower risk karyotype; SF3B1 with higher leukocyte count, higher platelet count, lower bone marrow blast percentage and lower risk karyotype; TET2 with older age and higher hemoglobin. Univariate overall and leukemia-free survival analysis before and after adjusting for IPSS-R: In univariate analysis, ASXL1, RUNX1 and TP53 mutations adversely and SF3B1 favorably affected survival; only ASXL1 mutations retained significance when analysis was adjusted for IPSS-R (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.1; p=0.03). For leukemia-free survival, univariate analysis identified SRSF2, which was near-significant for overall survival (p=0.06), and RUNX1 mutations as adverse and SF3B1 mutations as favorable risk factors; SRSF2 (HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.6-10.2) and SF3B1-unmutated (HR 5.9, 95% CI 1.1-31.5) retained their significance when adjusted for IPSS-R. A borderline significance (p=0.07) indicating inferior survival for patients with three or more mutations was fully accounted for by the significant (P<0.0001) association between the presence of ASXL1 mutations and higher number of mutations. Multivariable analysis with individual IPSS-R variables: When the five IPSS-R variables (hemoglobin, platelets, absolute neutrophil count, bone marrow blast percentage and karyotype) were analyzed (both as continuous and IPSS-R-defined categorical variables) with each one of the aforementioned mutations with significant effect on overall or leukemia-free survival, only ASXL1 retained its significance for overall survival (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3) and SRSF2 (HR 5.2, 95% CI 2.1-13.3) for leukemia-free survival. Other IPSS-R variables that retained their significance for survival, in the presence of ASXL1 mutation status as a covariate, included hemoglobin level, platelet count and karyotype. Conclusions: In our cohort of 179 molecularly-annotated patients with newly-diagnosed primary MDS, ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutations were identified as IPSS-R-independent risk factors for overall and leukemia-free survival, respectively. The current study also suggests the need to re-evaluate currently established risk factors, in the context of prognostically-relevant molecular information. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Enasidenib: First Mutant IDH2 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 1936-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghav Dogra ◽  
Rohit Bhatia ◽  
Ravi Shankar ◽  
Parveen Bansal ◽  
Ravindra K. Rawal
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Blood Cells ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia is the collective name for different types of leukemias of myeloid origin affecting blood and bone marrow. The overproduction of immature myeloblasts (white blood cells) is the characteristic feature of AML, thus flooding the bone marrow and reducing its capacity to produce normal blood cells. USFDA on August 1, 2017, approved a drug named Enasidenib formerly known as AG-221 which is being marketed under the name Idhifa to treat R/R AML with IDH2 mutation. The present review depicts the broad profile of enasidenib including various aspects of chemistry, preclinical, clinical studies, pharmacokinetics, mode of action and toxicity studies. Methods: Various reports and research articles have been referred to summarize different aspects related to chemistry and pharmacokinetics of enasidenib. Clinical data was collected from various recently published clinical reports including clinical trial outcomes. Result: The various findings of enasidenib revealed that it has been designed to allosterically inhibit mutated IDH2 to treat R/R AML patients. It has also presented good safety and efficacy profile along with 9.3 months overall survival rates of patients in which disease has relapsed. The drug is still under study either in combination or solely to treat hematological malignancies. Molecular modeling studies revealed that enasidenib binds to its target through hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen bonding inside the binding pocket. Enasidenib is found to be associated with certain adverse effects like elevated bilirubin level, diarrhea, differentiation syndrome, decreased potassium and calcium levels, etc. Conclusion: Enasidenib or AG-221was introduced by FDA as an anticancer agent which was developed as a first in class, a selective allosteric inhibitor of the tumor target i.e. IDH2 for Relapsed or Refractory AML. Phase 1/2 clinical trial of Enasidenib resulted in the overall survival rate of 40.3% with CR of 19.3%. Phase III trial on the Enasidenib is still under process along with another trial to test its potency against other cell lines. Edasidenib is associated with certain adverse effects, which can be reduced by investigators by designing its newer derivatives on the basis of SAR studies. Hence, it may come in the light as a potent lead entity for anticancer treatment in the coming years.

scholarly journals IMMU-08. MODELING UPFRONT GLIOBLASTOMA SURGICAL RESECTION AND STEROID USE REVEALS IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE CHANGES AND SUGGESTS THAT PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTE COUNTS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH TUMOR VOLUME AND PROGNOSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii106-ii106
Author(s):  
Balint Otvos ◽  
Tyler Alban ◽  
Matthew Grabowski ◽  
Defne Bayik ◽  
Robert Winkelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Peripheral Lymphocyte ◽  
Steroid Use ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Steroid Administration

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) and its treatment produces systemic immunosuppression, which is being targeted by immunotherapies. However, it remains unclear how surgical resection and steroids specifically in GBM alter the immune system. To further explore this issue, immunocompetent C57Bl/6 mice were intracranially inoculated with syngeneic glioma cells (GL261 and CT-2A) and growth of tumors was evaluated by MRI. Host immune cell populations were analyzed during surgical resection and steroid administration. Mice with surgically resected tumors had a longer median survival compared to mice subjected to tumor biopsies, and had increased bone marrow sequestration of both CD4 and CD8 T cells with corresponding decreased blood lymphocytes. Furthermore, physiologic doses of dexamethasone administered perioperatively decreased tumor edema, but increased the number and proliferative capacity of both marrow and circulating MDSCs while generating no survival benefit. Independent of therapy or dexamethasone, intracranial tumor volume correlated linearly with decreased CD4 and CD8 T cells in peripheral blood, and increased T cell sequestration within the bone marrow. We validated these parameters in steroid-naïve newly diagnosed GBM patients and observed decreased lymphocytes correlated linearly with increased tumor volume. When initial lymphocyte counts in both steroid-naïve and steroid-administered patients were used in univariate and multivariate models predicting progression-free survival and overall survival, decreased initial lymphocyte counts were an independent predictor of decreased progression free survival and decreased overall survival, with steroid use and initial tumor size falling out of significance during stepwise selection. Taken together, tumor volume is linearly correlated with marrow sequestration of lymphoid cells, but both surgery and steroid administration further suppress active immune responses along lymphoid and myeloid lineages. Furthermore, decreasing peripheral lymphocyte counts at diagnosis of GBM indicate an immune system less able to mount responses to the tumor and portent a worse progression free and overall survival.

scholarly journals Increased expression of cyclin-D1 on trephine bone marrow biopsies independently predicts for shorter overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel agents

2012 ◽  
Vol 87 (7) ◽  
pp. 734-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Tasidou ◽  
Maria Roussou ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Maria Gkotzamanidou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies

AN INDIAN PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DOCETAXEL THERAPY IN CRPC: CAN PRETREATMENT FACTORS PREDICT THE RESPONSE

2021 ◽  
pp. 78-81
Author(s):  
Devashish Kaushal ◽  
Rajeev Sood
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Carcinoma Prostate

Introduction: Studies on the effects of chemotherapy in Indian Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) patients are very limited and world data is inconsistent. The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects of Docetaxel therapy in CRPC in Indian patients in terms of survival benet, both progression-free survival, and overall survival. This study also analyzes the effects of various factors on the survival of CRPC patients. Methodology: This is a single institutional prospective observational study. CRPC patients were treated with Docetaxel and followed till death as the primary endpoint or till the end of the study. Survivals were calculated with the Kaplan Meier method. Factors affecting survival were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analysis by log-rank t-test and Cox proportion hazard regression analysis. Result: Out of enrolled 101 patients, 78 were treated with Docetaxel. A decline in PSA (>50% reduction) was observed in 61.54%. Radiological response of regression noted in 40 % Nuclear Bone Scan and 19.23% CT/MRI by RECIST criteria. Progression-free survival and overall survival with Docetaxel (n=78) were 11.8 and 21 months respectively. Hemoglobin less than 11 gm%, Alkaline phosphatase more than 115 IU/dl, PSAmore than 14 ng/ml, Gleason score more than 7 and duration from diagnosis of carcinoma prostate to CRPC less than 24 months, the number of chemotherapy cycles less than 6 were all found to be signicantly associated with poor overall survival in univariate analysis while only Hemoglobin (P=0.0159) showed an independent association with overall survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Overall and progression-free survival of CRPC patients with Docetaxel is 21 & 11.8 months respectively. Hemoglobin, Alkaline phosphatase, PSA, Gleason score, Docetaxel cycle, and duration from diagnosis of carcinoma prostate to CRPC were found to be signicantly associated with poor overall survival.

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4%, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6%, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2%, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document