Mirna Expression Profiling and Proteomic Analysis Of Circulating Exosomes From Multiple Myeloma Patients

Abstract Introduction Exosomes are small vesicles (50-100 nm) of endocytic origin, which are released in the extra-cellular milieu by several cell types. It is known that cell-to-cell communication is partially mediated by exosomes. Exosomes play a role in tumor progression where they have been shown to carry and transfer microRNAs (miRNAs) and proteins to the recipient cells. In this study, we sought to characterize circulating exosomes in terms of their ability to modulate the microenvironment, leading to Multiple Myeloma (MM) progression. Method Exosomes were collected from peripheral blood obtained from healthy individuals (n=5), MGUS patients (n=5) and MM patients (n=10), using ultracentrifugation. Further characterization was carried out using electron microscopy and immunogold labeling for the detection of CD63 and CD81 and for the size using Nanosight® analysis. MiRNA were isolated using miRNeasy mini kit (Qiagen®) and profiling has been performed using nCounter miRNA expression assay (Nanostring® Technologies, Seattle WA). Bioinformatic software tools (TargetScan, MIRDB) were used to predict the target genes of identified miRNA to define their function. Proteins were isolated from exosomes following lysis and precipitated by acetone before in-solution trypsin digestion and ZipTip® purification. Proteomic analysis was performed using mass spectrometry (BIDMC Mass Spectrometry, ObiTrap Elite®). Spectral count numbers were determined with a false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.5%. Results Circulating exosomes were studied at ultrastructural level showing positivity for CD81 and CD63, as demonstrated by immunogold labeling and electron microscopy. Exosome number and size did not differ based on clinical stage on Nanosight® analysis. We identified 16 miRNAs differentially expressed in circulating exosomes obtained from MGUS patients compared to healthy subjects (FC >2 or <-2; p<0.05): specifically, higher expression of miR-450a, -30e, -125a, -300 and lower expression of miR-185, -150, -98 were observed in MGUS- compared to healthy individual-derived circulating exosomes. Interestingly, miR-30e and -150 modulate NK cell activity by targeting perforin and c-Myb, respectively. We found 96 miRNAs differentially expressed in circulating exosomes from MM patients as compared to healthy donors: specifically lower expression of Let-7 family members, miR-150, -15a and higher expression of miR-125b, -144 and -363 were observed. Interestingly, miR-15a is involved in angiogenesis regulating VEGFA and FGF2. Let-7 family members are tumor suppressors targeting k-Ras and c-Myc and miR-150 regulates CXCR-4 expression. Moreover, these patterns have been described in MM cells suggesting that circulating exosomes in MM are mainly released from MM cells and could play a role in modulating the tumor micro-environment. The mass spectrometry analysis was performed on protein derived from circulating exosomes from 5 healthy donors, 5 MGUS and 10 MM patients. 272 proteins were identified in circulating exosomes including proteins highly associated with exosomes such as CD9, HSP70, Rab proteins (Rab7a; Rab5; Rab27b) and annexins. Comparing MM exosomal proteins to healthy donor exosomal proteins, we found significantly distinctive peptide counts for fibronectin (FC=3.5; p=0.002), AMBP protein (FC=3; p=0.001) and Ig gamma-1 chain C region (FC=2.5; p=0.006). Interestingly, fibronectin expression level in the microenvironment has been reported to be associated with tumor proliferation and drug resistance in MM. Conclusion These findings indicate that circulating exosomes differ between normal, MGUS and MM patients in terms of miRNA and protein content. Circulating exosomes could potentially be involved in modulating the host microenvironment for specific homing of clonal plasma cells to the bone marrow; thus providing a better understanding of the epigenetic changes responsible for the transition to MM stage. Disclosures: Leleu: CELGENE: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria. Ghobrial:Onyx: Advisoryboard Other; BMS: Advisory board, Advisory board Other, Research Funding; Noxxon: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Comparative miRNA Expression Profiling of Circulating Exosomes From MGUS and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3975.3975 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3975-3975

Author(s):

Salomon Manier ◽

Erica N Boswell ◽

Antonio Sacco ◽

Patricia Maiso ◽

Ranjit Banwait ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Electron Microscopy ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Mirna Expression ◽

Expression Profiling ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Immunogold Labeling ◽

Differentially Expressed ◽

Mirna Expression Profiling ◽

Lower Expression

Abstract Abstract 3975 Introduction. Exosomes are small vesicles (50–100 nm) of endocytic origin, which are released in the extra-cellular milieu by several cell types. It is known that cell-to-cell communication is partially mediated by exosomes. The role of exosomes has been shown in tumor progression, due to their ability to carry and transfer microRNAs (miRNAs) to the recipient cells. In this study, we sought to examine the role of circulating exosomes in modulating transition from a monoclonal gammopathy of undermined significance (MGUS) stage to a smoldering myeloma (SMM) stage. Method. Exosomes were collected from peripheral blood obtained from healthy individuals (n=4), MGUS patients (n=4) and SMM patients (n=4), using ultracentrifugation; and further studied by using electron microscopy and immunogold labeling for the detection of CD63 and CD81. miRNA profiling has been performed using nCounter miRNA expression assay (Nanostring® Technologies, Seattle WA). Bioinformatic software tools (TargetScan, MIRDB) were used to predict the target genes of identified miRNA and define their function. Results. Circulating exosomes were studied at ultrastructural level showing positivity for CD81 and CD63, as demonstrated by immunogold labeling and electron microscopy. We identified 16 miRNAs differentially expressed in circulating exosome obtained from MGUS patients compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.05): specifically, higher expression of miR-450a, -30e, -125a, -300 and lower expression of miR-185, -150, -98 were observed in MGUS- compared to heatly individual-derived circulating exosomes. Interestingly, miR-30e and -150 are important for modulation of NK cell activity by targeting perforin and c-Myb, respectively. We furthermore compared the miRNA expression profiling between MGUS and SMM circulating exosomes; and found 11 miRNAs differentially expressed (p < 0.05). Specifically, higher expression of miR-107 and lower expression of miR-28, -32, -548a, -939, -99a, -345, -125a, -587, -323b and -92a were observed in SMM- compared to MGUS-derived circulating exosomes. Among the de-regulated miRNAs, miR-99a, -345, -92a and -28 are known to act as tumor suppressors in prior publications. Moreover, predicted targets for miR-107 include genes involved in molding the bone marrow microenvironment. Indeed, miR-107 is known to decrease hypoxia-inducible factor-1 β (HIF-1β), miR-125a correlated with the expression level of matrix metalloproteinase 11 (MMP11), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and miR-548a regulates the expression of MMP2. Conclusion. These findings indicate that circulating exosomes differ between normal, MGUS and SMM patients, and could potentially be involved in modulating the host microenvironment for specific homing of clonal plasma cells to the bone marrow; thus providing a better understanding of the epigenetic changes responsible for the transition from an MGUS stage to a SMM stage. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Millennium: Advisory Board Other; Novartis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other.

Download Full-text

Enhancing the Cytotoxicity of NK Cells Toward Multiple Myeloma Using an Antibody Specific to SLAMF7

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.2092.2092 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 2092-2092

Author(s):

Tatiana Pazina ◽

Ashley M James ◽

Adam D. Cohen ◽

Kerry S. Campbell

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Nk Cells ◽

Tumor Cells ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Target Cells ◽

Healthy Donors ◽

Cd69 Expression ◽

Stimulation Of

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of plasma cells characterized by a monoclonal expansion of tumor cells in bone marrow and accumulation of a monoclonal protein in blood and urine, which ultimately leads to end-stage organ damage. Despite advances in therapy, MM remains an incurable disease. Recent investigations have revealed a new therapeutic target for MM, SLAMF7 (CS1), which is expressed at high levels on MM tumor cells. SLAMF7 is also found on NK, CD8+ T, CD4+ T and activated B cells. Elotuzumab (HuLuc63) is a humanized IgG1 anti-SLAMF7 antibody, which can facilitate killing of primary MM cells by NK cells via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and has shown promise in treating relapsed MM. A key question in understanding elotuzumab’s mechanism of action is whether it can directly activate NK cells via SLAMF7 binding, in addition to Fc-mediated activation via binding of CD16 (FcγRIIIA). We have examined the in vitro effect of elotuzumab on NK cells in fresh human peripheral blood from healthy donors and MM patients incubated with or without MM cell lines that have varied levels of SLAMF7 surface expression. Cytotoxic degranulation of NK cells was quantified by staining for CD107a (marker of degranulation) after 2 hours, and direct effects of elotuzumab on NK cells were assessed by measuring upregulation of the CD69 activation marker after 24 hours of antibody exposure. Degranulation of fresh primary NK cells toward SLAMF7-bearing MM target cell lines was stimulated by addition of elotuzumab. Intensity of the degranulation response was dependent upon the concentration of elotuzumab and the expression level of SLAMF7 on the MM target cells. While elotuzumab alone could stimulate low-level degranulation of NK cells in fresh PBL from healthy donors, the degranulation response was stronger if SLAMF7-expressing MM target cells were added in combination with elotuzumab. Addition of F(ab’)2 elotuzumab or an Fc mutant form of elotuzumab that cannot bind CD16 did not stimulate degranulation, implying that binding of the antibody to SLAMF7 on NK cells and MM cells, without concomitant engagement of NK cell Fc receptors, is insufficient to trigger degranulation. Soluble intact elotuzumab stimulated CD69 expression and degranulation by fresh primary NK cells in the absence of MM target cells, which peaked at 1 µg/ml and only modestly increased up to 100 µg/ml elotuzumab. In the same assays, we only observed modest stimulation of CD69 expression using soluble F(ab’)2 or Fc mutant elotuzumab. In contrast, plate-bound F(ab’)2 elotuzumab stimulated robust CD69 expression, indicating that the antibody can induce direct stimulation of NK cells through SLAMF7, but strong stimulation requires aggregation of the antibody. In soluble form, a non-fucosylated version of elotuzumab with greater affinity for CD16 stimulated significantly stronger degranulation and CD69 expression than intact elotuzumab, both in the presence or absence of MM target cells, and with both high and low SLAMF7 expression on target cells. Importantly, elotuzumab was found to induce similar degranulation by NK cells from freshly isolated peripheral blood of MM patients as compared to healthy donors. Taken together, our data support the hypothesis that binding of soluble elotuzumab to SLAMF7 can weakly activate NK cells, but strong activation and degranulation require antibody aggregation or engagement of the Fc domain with CD16. Elotuzumab variants with enhanced CD16 binding, such as a non-fucosylated version, can augment ADCC against myeloma cell lines, and warrant further study as a potential strategy to improve clinical efficacy in MM patients. Disclosures Cohen: Celgene: Member, Independent Response Adjudication Committee Other; Janssen: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Research Funding; Onyx: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other. Campbell:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisory Board Other, Research Funding; Janssen: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Conkwest: Consultancy, Patented NK-92 cell lines, Patented NK-92 cell lines Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies a Somatic Cell Mutation Signature That Predicts Relapse Risk and Survival Probability in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142791 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5-5

Author(s):

Ehsan Malek ◽

E. Ricky Chan ◽

Daniel Qu ◽

Jane Reese ◽

Robert Fox ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Signaling Pathways ◽

Exome Sequencing ◽

Whole Exome Sequencing ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

High Burden ◽

Signature Genes ◽

Whole Exome ◽

Relapse Group

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm associated with heterogeneous somatic alterations. Despite the development of novel anti-myeloma agents that have significantly prolonged patient survival, disease relapse remains a daunting problem. Our goal was to employ whole-exome sequencing (WES) to better describe the mutational landscape in MM beyond the tumor cell and identify genomic factors that might predict relapse. WES was performed using autograft samples obtained from MM patients that were then treated with high dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). We identified a panel of genes that were most frequently mutated in all patients and then identified those genes mutated with greater frequency in patients that relapsed. A relapse burden signature was generated based upon the genes that were most frequently mutated genes in relapsed patients. Finally, the relapse burden signature was correlated with patient progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) following autologous HCT. Methods. DNA was extracted from one ml of cryopreserved, mobilized hematopoietic cell product obtained from patients (N=93) that underwent HCT and was provided by the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Hematopoietic Biorepository Core. Targeted sequencing was performed using the Tempus xE whole exome platform (Tempus, Chicago, IL). Variants were identified using a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥0.1 for each sample. Variants were tabulated for each gene in each patient. Patients were grouped according to their relapse status; "No Relapse" (N=39) and "Relapse" (N=54) which corresponded to their post-HCT outcome. Relapse time was defined as time from transplant to event. Variants identified in each gene and patient group were counted and ranked. A relapse burden signature was defined and included twenty-two genes over-represented in the relapse group compared to the non-relapse group by > 10%. Genes in the relapse burden signature were subjected to gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and cross referenced against Gene Ontology (GO) categories. PFS and OS were defined as the time from transplant until the event of interest, with censoring at time of last follow up. Patients were regrouped according to their mutation burden in the relapse signature genes ("High burden" defined as >=six signature genes with variants) and their OS and PFS were analyzed with an R package (survival) to generate Kaplan-Meier curves and statistical significance based on a Chi-square test between low and high burden patients. Results: In total, 3,523 genes were identified as containing variants. Table 1 lists the top thirty genes that were identified and ranked based upon total number of mutations (mutational count) and most frequently mutated in relapsed and non-relapsed patients (sample count). We then identified those genes that were more frequently mutated by at least 10% in relapsed patients compared to non-relapsed patients (Fig. 1A). GSEA revealed that the relapse burden gene signature was associated with protein O-linked glycosylation, glycan processing, Golgi lumen and innate immune response activating cell surface receptor signaling pathways (Table 2). Interestingly, multiple mucin family members (Muc2, Muc3A, Muc12 and Muc19) were represented in the relapse burden signature. GO analysis indicated that the individual mucin genes were associated with the same signaling pathways that had been associated with the relapse burden signature by GSEA (Table 3). Importantly, a high relapse burden signature was correlated with a statistically significant reduction in both PFS and OS (Fig. 1B, C). Conclusion: Taken together, our results support the feasibility of WES to generate a relapse burden signature that predicts the risk of MM patients for relapse following HCT. Moreover, the mutational landscape associated with relapse, i.e. the specific genes mutated, has provided insights on the mechanisms of relapse. It is noteworthy that the relapse burden signature genes identified here were mutated at a much greater frequency than genes associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). The identification of patient subgroups at heightened risk of relapse can better guide treatment decisions. Future studies will be conducted to evaluate the effect of pathways identified here on myeloma cell survival and to validate actionable therapeutic targets. Disclosures Malek: Bluespark: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Advisory board , Speakers Bureau; Medpacto: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Other: Advisory board; Clegene: Other: Advisory board , Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Cumberland: Research Funding. Caimi:Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board; Kite pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; ADC therapeutics: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. de Lima:Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Other: Personal Fees, advisory board; Incyte: Other: Personal Fees, advisory board; Kadmon: Other: Personal Fees, Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Personal fees, advisory board, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Bendamustine Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1856.1856 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1856-1856 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Suzanne Lentzsch ◽

Amy O’Sullivan ◽

Silvana Lalo ◽

Carrie Kruppa ◽

Diane Gardner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1856 Poster Board I-882 Background: Lenalidomide is an analog of thalidomide that has shown significant clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), both as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone. Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or relapsed within 6 months following a rituximab-containing regimen. Bendamustine combined with lenalidomide may be an effective treatment option for MM patients, particularly those with preexisting or bortezomib-induced neuropathy. Our primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bendamustine and lenalidomide when administered with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed, measurable stage 2 or 3 MM that was refractory to or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies, including lenalidomide, received bendamustine by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2, oral lenalidomide on days 1–21, and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until a plateau of best response, as determined by the IBMTR/ABMTR, was reached. Study drug doses were escalated through 4 levels (Table), with 3–6 patients enrolled at each level depending on the rate of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After determining the MTD, up to an additional 12 patients will be enrolled in an MTD expansion arm to better evaluate toxicity and clinical activity. Secondary endpoints included preliminary efficacy, as evidenced by objective response, time to disease progression, and overall survival. Results: To date, 11 patients have been enrolled, with a median age of 63 years (range, 38–75 years). The MTD of bendamustine and lenalidomide has not been identified at this point; currently, patients are enrolling on dose level 3 with 100 mg/m2 bendamustine and 10 mg lenalidomide. Thus far, DLT included 1 grade 4 neutropenia at dose level 2. Nine of 11 patients are currently eligible for response assessment. A partial response was observed in 67% of patients, including 1 very good partial response and 5 partial responses (PR). Two patients experienced stable disease and 1 exhibited progressive disease. Grade 3/4 adverse events included grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and prolonged QTC, and 1 grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: Bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone form a well-tolerated and highly active regimen even in heavily pretreated MM patients, with a PR rate of 67%. Additional updates on response and MTD will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Lentzsch: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is not FDA approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in the USA. Burt:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mapara:Resolvyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Spouse is consultant , has received research funding, and participates on advisory board; Cephalon: Spouse has received funding for clinical trial and participates on advisory board. Redner:Biogen: Equity Ownership; Wyeth: Equity Ownership; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roodman:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy. Zonder:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cephalon: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Speaking (CME only); no promotional talks.

Download Full-text

A Phase IB, Multi-Center, Open-Label Dose-Escalation Study of Oral Panobinostat (LBH589) and I.V. Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3852.3852 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3852-3852 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Jesús F. San-Miguel ◽

Orhan Sezer ◽

David Siegel ◽

Andreas Guenther ◽

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clinical Investigation ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Protease Inhibition ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Dose Escalation Study ◽

Phase Ib ◽

Synergistic Cytotoxicity

Abstract Abstract 3852 Poster Board III-788 Introduction Panobinostat (LBH589) is a highly potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi), inclusive of HDAC6, which disrupts aggresome function, promotes accumulation of cytotoxic misfolded protein aggregates and triggers myeloma cell death. Combination of pan-DAC and protease inhibition by co-treatment with panobinostat (PAN) and bortezomib (BTZ) has demonstrated synergistic cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo in multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines and may provide increased efficacy in patients with MM. The primary objective of this Phase Ib trial is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral PAN when combined with BTZ in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Safety, tolerability, PK/PD, and preliminary efficacy are the secondary objectives. Results A total of 29 patients have been enrolled into four completed dosing Cohorts: (I) 10 mg PAN (TIW) + 1 mg/m2 BTZ (i.v., Days 1, 4, 8, 11) during a 21-day cycle; (II) 20 mg PAN + 1 mg/m2 BTZ; (III) 20 mg PAN + 1.3 mg/m2 BTZ; (IV) 30 mg PAN + 1.3 mg/m2 BTZ. Enrollment into Cohort V is ongoing at 25 mg PAN + 1.3 mg/m2 BTZ with 6 patients accrued to date. In Cohorts I– IV, the median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–6); 25 patients had at least one prior auto-SCT. Of 16 BTZ pretreated patients, 11 were refractory to their last prior BTZ-based therapy (9 with PD, 2 with SD on BTZ). Median time on study has been 97 days (range 7–424). Overall, the combination of PAN and BTZ was safe and tolerated in Cohorts I - III with one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (Gr 4 afebrile neutropenia) in Cohort II. In Cohort IV, four DLTs were reported: two Gr 4 thrombocytopenias,(requiring platelet transfusions), Gr 3 pneumonia, and Gr 3 fatigue. In the subsequent Cohort V, PAN dose was de-escalated. Hematologic adverse events (AEs) have been frequent, including Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia (25), neutropenia (18), and anemia (6). Non-hematologic AEs included: diarrhea (18), fever (15), nausea (14), fatigue (14), and asthenia (11). A total of 1,778 ECGs were centrally, reviewed with neither QTcF prolongation from baseline >60 msec nor absolute QTcF duration >480 msec noted. Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia was manageable by dose modification and platelet transfusion; two patients only discontinued for this AE in Cohorts I – III and no hemorrhagic events were reported in association with thrombocytopenia. Encouraging clinical efficacy was observed in all four Cohorts, with 14 responders (partial response [PR] or better) in 28 evaluable patients (50%), including 4 with immunofixation (IF) negative complete response (CR). Four additional patients achieved minor responses, resulting in 64% overall response rate. Responses were also seen in the subset of patients refractory to prior BTZ, suggesting a strong clinical correlate for synergism of the PAN/BTZ combination: 6 of 10 (60%) BTZ-refractory evaluable pts responded, including 4 PR and 2 MR (see Table for details). Dexamethasone (DEX) was introduced at Cycle 2 (or 3) in 9 pts; 11 of 18 pts with a response did not receive DEX, including several pts refractory to BTZ. All 15 patients in Cohorts III and IV treated with the full registered dose of BTZ (1.3 mg/m2) in combination with PAN 20 mg experienced a clinical benefit; however, toxicity in Cohort IV was not acceptable. Conclusion The encouraging clinical anti-myeloma synergism of the PAN and BTZ combination in this trial warrants further clinical investigation in patients with refractory and relapsed MM. Given the frequency of thrombocytopenia and dose adjustments, the dosing schedule in subsequent Phase II/III studies will be modified to take the safety profile and dose-reduction/-interruption pattern into account. Disclosures: San-Miguel: Novartis: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Honoraria; J&J: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Honoraria. Sezer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Siegel:Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Speakers Bureau. Guenther:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mateos:Ortho Biotech: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria. Cavo:Novartis: Honoraria. Blade:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Boccadoro:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Bengoudifa:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Klebsattel:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Bourquelot:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Anderson:Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Excellent Tolerability and Promising Activity In a Heavily Pretreated Population

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1951.1951 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1951-1951 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

Donna Weber ◽

Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

Lin28B/Let-7 Axis Regulates Multiple Myeloma Proliferation By Enhancing c-Myc and Ras Survival Pathways

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.273.273 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 273-273

Author(s):

Salomon Manier ◽

John T Powers ◽

Antonio Sacco ◽

Michaela R Reagan ◽

Michele Moschetta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Cell Proliferation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Lines ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Loss Of Function ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Expression Levels ◽

Gain And Loss

Abstract Background MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a pivotal role in tumorigenesis, due to their ability to target mRNAs involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, survival and differentiation. Lin28B is an RNA binding protein that regulates Let-7 miRNA maturation. Lin28B and Let-7 have been described to act as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, respectively, as demonstrated both in solid cancer and hematologic malignancies. However, the role of the Lin28B/Let-7 axis in Multiple Myeloma (MM) has not been studied. Method Lin28B level expression in MM patients was studied using previously published gene expression profiling (GEP) datasets. Let-7 expression levels were assessed in CD138+ primary MM cells and bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) by using PCR, as well as in circulating exosomes using miRNA array (Nanostring® Technology). Exosomes were collected from both normal and MM peripheral blood, using ultracentrifugation; and further studied by using electron microscopy and immunogold labeling for the detection of CD63 and CD81. The knockdown of Lin28B was performed on MM cell lines (U266, MM.1S, MOLP-8) by using a lentiviral Lin28B shRNA. Gain- and loss-of function studies for Let-7 were performed using Let-7 mimic and anti-Let-7 transfection in MM cell lines (MM1S, U266) and primary BMSCs. Cell proliferation has been evaluated by using thymidine assays. Effects of Let-7 and Lin28B on signaling cascades have been evaluated by western blot. Results Two independent GEP datasets (GSE16558; GSE2658) were analyzed for Lin28B expression, showing a significantly higher level in MM patients compared to healthy controls. In addition, high Lin28B levels correlated with a shorter overall survival (p = 0.0226). We next found that the Let-7 family members are significantly down-regulated in MM primary cells, particularly Let-7a and b (5 fold change, p < 0.05), as demonstrated by using qRT-PCR. Similarly, miRNA arrays showed a lower expression of Let-7-related miRNAs in circulating exosomes obtained from MM patients compared to healthy individuals. We further dissected the functional relevance of Lin28B in MM cells, by performing Lin28 knockdown (KD) in MM cell lines (U266, MOLP-8). This led to a significant decrease in MM cell proliferation associated with G1 phase cell cycle arrest. This was supported by up-regulation of Let-7 and down-regulation of c-Myc, Ras and Cyclin D1 in Lin28 KD MM cells. To further prove that Lin28B-dependent effects on MM cells are mediated by Let7, we next showed that let-7 gain- and loss-of-function studies regulate MM cell proliferation and Myc expression. Lin28B regulation in MM cells is dependent on Let-7, as demonstrated by an increase of both cell proliferation and c-Myc expression after anti-Let-7 transfection in the Lin28B KD cells. We therefore studied the regulation of Let-7 in MM cells through the interaction with BMSCs. Let-7 expression levels were significantly lower in BMSCs obtained from MM patients compared to healthy donors. Interestingly, the Let-7 expression level in MM cells was increased after co-culture with Let-7 over-expressing BMSCs, associated with a decrease of both cell proliferation and c-Myc expression. This suggests a potential transfer of Let-7 from BMSCs to MM cells. Conclusion This work describes a new signaling pathway involving Lin28B, Let-7, Myc and Ras in MM. Let-7 expression in MM cells is also regulated through the interaction of MM cells with BMSCs, leading to cell proliferation and Myc regulation in MM. Interference with this pathway might offer therapeutic perspectives. Disclosures: Leleu: CELGENE: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria. Daley:Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; MPM Capital: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; iPierian: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Solasia, KK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Onyx: Advisoryboard Other; BMS: Advisory board, Advisory board Other, Research Funding; Noxxon: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Microrna-Dependent Modulation Of Osteogenesis In a 3D In Vitro Bone Marrow Model System Of Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3093.3093 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3093-3093

Author(s):

Michaela R Reagan ◽

Yuji Mishima ◽

Yong Zhang ◽

Patricia Maiso ◽

Salomon Manier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Research Funding ◽

3D Model ◽

Human Cancer ◽

Model System ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Alizarin Red ◽

Non Destructive

Abstract Introduction Recent evidence indicates that tumor cells are not only influenced by their microenvironment, but are also able to drastically alter their surroundings leading to cancer progression. Multiple Myeloma (MM) involves clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells within the bone marrow, inhibition of osteoblast function, and increased osteoclast activity leading to osteolytic lesions. Our work aims to understand the bi-directional interactions between MM cells and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), using both 2D and 3D in vitro co-culture bone marrow models. Methods We developed a 3D in vitro model system to better mimic myeloma growth within the bone marrow using human MSCs (hMSCs) and fluorescent-, luciferase-labeled MM cell lines seeded into porous, autofluorescent silk scaffolds. Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of myeloma patient (MM-) and normal donor (ND-) MSCs cultured with or without MM.1S cells were characterized in 2D culture and 3D scaffolds. Non-destructive bioluminescent imaging and fluorescent confocal imaging were used to observe cell growth and cell-cell interactions within scaffolds. Histology was performed to confirm changes in extracellular matrix (ECM) production and bone tissue formation. microRNA (miRNA) profiling was performed on primary ND- (n=3) and MM-MSCs (n=7) using Nanostring technologies. We analyzed 800 human miRNAs from miRBase v.18 and 230 human cancer-related genes using the nCounter® Human Cancer Reference Kit. Gain-of function studies (miRvana mimics) were performed for miRNAs that were down-modulated in MM vs ND-MSCs, and in the 3D model MSCs co-cultured with MM.1S vs MSCs alone, using lipofectamine. Modulation of osteogenesis was evaluated using alizarin red staining and qRT-PCR for the osteogenic markers: IBSP (integrin-binding sialoprotein), Col1a1 (collagen, type I, alpha 1), RUNX2 (runt related transcription factor 2), ALPL (alkaline phosphatase), OPN (secreted phosphoprotein 1), and BGLAP (bone gamma-carboxyglutamate (gla) protein). Results MM-MSCs presented with a lower proliferation rate compared to ND-MSCs and this phenotype was also observed in ND-MSCs co-cultured in the presence of MM.1S cells compared to ND-MSCs alone. Moreover, significant inhibition of MSC growth was evident when co-cultured with MM.1S cells, using a 3D model (Figure 1), where inhibition of osteogenesis, and ECM production were also documented. Alizarin red staining demonstrated inhibited ability for MM-MSCs to undergo osteogenic differentiation. In addition, MM-MSCs differed from ND-MSCs at the gene and miRNA level. Specifically, CDKN1A and CDKN2A were over-expressed in MM vs. ND-MSCs, (P<0.05; fold change >1.2), thus explaining, at least in part, the decreased proliferation of MM-MSCs vs ND-MSCs. Moreover, down-regulation of specific miRNAs (miRNA-199a, -24-3p, -199a, -15a-5p, -16-5p) was demonstrated in MM- vs ND-MSCs, as well as in ND-MSCs vs ND-MSCs co-cultured with MM.1S, using the 3D model. By over-expressing miRNA-199a, -15a-5p and -16-5p, we were able to increase the osteogenic potential, thus suggesting their role in modulating osteogenesis in MM-MSCs. Conclusions Our 3D platform provides a simple, non-destructive, flexible, and clinically relevant tool to spatially and temporally model myeloma growth within bone. It recapitulates decreased bone formation as seen in MM patients and suggests miR-199a-3p, 15a-5p and 16-5p as novel bone anabolic targets. Disclosures: Tai: Onyx: Consultancy. Ghobrial:Onyx: Advisoryboard Other; BMS: Advisory board, Advisory board Other, Research Funding; Noxxon: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Spatiotemporal Assessment of Immunogenomic Heterogeneity in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142622 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 14-15 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Maximilian Merz ◽

Almuth Maria Anni Merz ◽

Jie Wang ◽

Lei Wei ◽

Ahmed Belal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

T Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clonal Evolution ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Braf Inhibitors ◽

Healthy Individuals ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Site Specific

Introduction: Therapy and immune mediated processes are associated with clonal evolution in multiple myeloma (MM). In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) and single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on plasma cells (PC) from bone marrow aspirates of the iliac crest (BM) and corresponding osteolytic lesions (OL) to investigate spatial heterogeneity in patients with newly diagnosed (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Next generation flow (NGF) and T-cell receptor sequencing (TCRseq) were performed to investigate the immunogenomic landscape surrounding malignant PC. Methods: In a prospective trial, 18 patients (NDMM: n=10; RRMM: n=8) consented to an imaging-guided biopsy of an OL in addition to the regular BM sampling. At inclusion, 37 different locations were biopsied. Follow-up samples were obtained from 5 patients in remission after therapy. After CD138+ selection, PC were subjected to WES and scRNA-seq (Chromium, 10x genomics). TCRseq was performed using multiplex PCR (ImmunoSEQ, Adaptive biotechnologies) on the CD138- fraction. For scRNA-seq data analyses, Cell Ranger (v3.1.0) and the Seurat R toolkit (v3.1) were used. TCRseq data were analyzed with immunoSEQ ANALYZER (v3.0) and the immunarch R toolkit (v0.6.6.). NGF was performed to study subsets of T-, B-, NK- and dendritic cells (DC). Results: Median PC infiltration was higher in OL compared to random BM (50.0% vs 12.5%, p=0.041). WES revealed more mutations in RRMM compared to NDMM (median; range: 189;120-523 vs 71;23-136, p<0.001). Based on mutational profiles from WES, 4 of 18 patients showed a branching evolution in PC isolated from OL. Three of the 4 patients had RRMM and one patient with NDMM had a prior history of solitary plasmacytoma. PC were obtained from OL with adjacent extramedullary disease (EMD) in 3 of 4 patients with branching evolution. Among site-specific mutations, we found in one patient two distinct BRAF mutations: V600E in the BM and G469R in the OL. An additional NRAS mutation (G12D) was found in the OL. BRAF G469R and NRAS G12D cause resistance to BRAF inhibitors, although this patient was naïve to BRAF-inhibitors. Clonal evolution was also reflected by chromosomal aberrations, including site-specific chromothripsis of chromosome 1 in a patient with RRMM. Even in patients without spatially divergent clones as detected by WES, scRNA-seq of more than 150,000 PC from 10 patients and 21 different locations revealed multiple clones. Distinct PC clones were identified by differential expression of genes associated with homing to the BM (CXCR4), malignant transformation (Jun/Fos, CD27, CD79a), apoptosis (BCL-2) bone disease (DKK1) and LAMP-5. In a patient with NDMM in remission after induction therapy, scRNA-seq demonstrated the emergence of a PC clone characterized by the overexpression of Interferon-induced genes (ISG15, IFI27, IFI44L) compared to the initially predominant PC clones. Next, we investigated spatiotemporal differences of immune cells. Estimation of median TCR richness using an abundance-based estimator (Chao1) revealed significantly lower values in patients with RRMM (120444; 57706-212744) compared to NDMM (389341; 50318-525082, p<0.001) and nine healthy individuals (460278; 138326-696419, p<0.001). No significant differences were found for TCR clonality as indicated by Simpson's D. While longitudinal tracking of TCR clones at primary diagnosis showed no clonal expansion after treatment, induction therapy restored sample richness in patients with NDMM to levels of healthy individuals (p=0.61). Overlap analysis showed a high concordance of TCR repertoires from OL and random BM with Morisita indices ranging in 90% of patients from 0.80 to 0.95. Nevertheless, significant site-specific expansion of TCR clones was detected. In accordance with TCRseq, NGF showed in the BM of patients with RRMM more regulatory T-cells (p=0.048) and less myeloid DC (p=0.024), Th9 cells and CD8 effector memory T-cells compared to NDMM. Conclusion: We report the first prospective clinical trial to investigate spatiotemporal immunogenomic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma as assessed by WES and scRNA-seq of PC and NGF and TCRseq of the non-PC compartment. We demonstrate spatial evolution and reduced TCR diversity especially in patients with RRMM and/or EMD. ScRNA-seq adds another layer of complexity compared to WES and helps identifying how PC create an immune suppressive BM niche. Disclosures Merz: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Takeda: Honoraria. Block:GlaxoSmithKline LLC: Current Employment. McCarthy:Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Magenta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board , Research Funding is to Roswell Park, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Starton: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hillengass:Adaptive, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Oncotracker, Takeda: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Multicenter, Open Label Phase I/II Study of Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1145.1145 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1145-1145 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Sara Bringhen ◽

Valeria Magarotto ◽

Anna Marina Liberati ◽

Angelo Belotti ◽

Alessandra Larocca ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Response Rate ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Level 1

Abstract Background: Survival rates of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) has improved over the past few years, but patients inevitably relapse and become more resistant to subsequent treatments. Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide were both approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Combinations including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) plus an immunomodulator (IMiD), such as Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (VRD) or Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (CRD), showed a very high response rate with an acceptable toxicity. Moreover, in the CHAMPION1 study (Berenson et al Blood 2016), the weekly infusion of Carfilzomib showed to be as effective as the twice schedule. In this phase I/II study we assessed for the first time weekly Carfilzomib plus Pomalidomide and low dose Dexamethasone (wKPd) for the treatment of RRMM. Here we report preliminary results. Methods: the primary objective of the phase I part of the trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of wKPd combination. The primary objective of the phase II was to determine the rate of partial response (PR). Patients with RRMM, who received 1-3 prior lines of treatments and were refractory to Lenalidomide were eligible. Treatment consisted of 28-day cycles of oral Pomalidomide at fixed dose of 4 mg on days 1-21 (1 week off), oral or intravenous (iv) Dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1,8,15,22 and iv Carfilzomib at escalating doses on days 1,8,15. Escalation started at the dose of 36 mg/m2 (0 level) and used a standard 3+3 schema based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Treatment was continued until relapse or intolerance. Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled in 6 Italian centers. Fifty-two patients could be evaluated for this analysis (5 patients did not complete the first cycle yet). The median age was 62 years with a median time from diagnosis of 4 years. 17/39 (44%) of patients were considered high risk according to cytogenetic abnormalities [at least one among t (4;14) t (14;16) and deletion chromosome 17 (del17) detected by FISH]. In the phase I of the trial 15 patients were enrolled. The first 3 patients at the dose level 0 of Carfilzomib did not experience any DLT. In the next cohort with Carfilzomib 20/45 mg/m2 a G3 hypertension and a sudden death occurred. According to the protocol, 3 more patients were enrolled at dose level 0: 1 patient experienced G3 atrial fibrillation, 2 patients ≥ G3 hypertension. Considering the serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred, the trial was temporary stopped to evaluate the benefit of continuing the study. All the DLTs were cardiologic and occurred in patients with a prior history of cardiac disease. As per protocol, they were evaluated with ECG and echocardiogram before the enrolment and were considered eligible for the study. The safety committee established new procedures for the evaluation of cardiac function of potentially eligible patients, including 24 h continuing pressure monitoring before the enrolment and serial measurement of blood pressure during and after Carfilzomib infusions. Six more patients were enrolled at dose level -1 (Carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m2) and none experienced a DLT. The MTD was established at dose level -1 with Carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m2, Pomalidomide 4 mg and Dexamethasone 40 mg. In the phase II portion of the trial, 42 patients were enrolled. Considering both phase I and II portions of the study, the most frequent drug related, grade ≥ 3 AEs were hematologic (65% of neutropenia and 13% of thrombocytopenia) and cardiologic (17%, mainly hypertension). We recorded only 4% of infection and ≥ G3 peripheral neuropathy. The overall response rate (ORR) of phase I/II portions was 58% (30/52) including 25% (13/52) of ≥ very good partial remission (VGPR). The ORR of high risk patients was 44% (7/16) including 19% (3/16) of ≥ VGPR. With a median follow-up of 10 months, median progression free survival (PFS) was 9.5 months and the median overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: This is the first phase I/II trial that combined weekly Carfilzomib with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone. This combination was highly effective in RRMM. After a median follow-up of 10 months, wKRd showed a double median PFS in comparison with Pomalidomide-low dose dexamethasone (Sanmiguel et al Lancet Oncology 2013): 9.5 vs 4 months respectively, confirming the efficacy of combining a PI with an IMiD. An updated analysis will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Bringhen: BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Amgen: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; Mundipharma: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; Karyopharm: Other: ADVISORY BOARD. Larocca:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Gaidano:Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Oliva:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Sonneveld:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Palumbo:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Takeda: Employment, Honoraria. Boccadoro:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbivie: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Research Funding; SANOFI: Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text