Addition of Lomustine (CCNU) to Induction and Post-Remission Chemotherapy for Fit Elderly AML Patients without Unfavorable Cytogenetics: Results of the Lamsa-2007 Goelams Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3736-3736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Pigneux ◽  
Christian Recher ◽  
Marie C Bene ◽  
Julien Asselineau ◽  
Ariane C. Mineur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Elderly Aml ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Pre Treatment

Abstract Background: The treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in elderly patients remains unsatisfactory, with an expected survival time of about 1 year post diagnosis. In an attempt to improve outcome for these patients, the prospective open-label phase 3 LAMSA-2007 trial (Clinicaltrial.gov ID, NCT00590837) repeated, at decreasing doses in consolidation and reinduction courses, a standard induction regimen with cytarabine and idarubicin (IC), with or without the randomized addition of lomustine (ICL). This alkylating agent with significant anti-leukemic activity is widely used in France for AML therapy. This study was performed as a confirmatory trial, following our previous report of the French experience in which this compound stood out as a favorable factor of improved outcome for patients with non-unfavorable cytogenetics (Pigneux, JCO 2010). Methods: Eligible patients were adults 60 years old or more, with previously untreated AML, fit to receive intensive chemotherapy (ECOG and SORROR <3), with non-unfavorable cytogenetics. Secondary AML to MDS and MPS were excluded, but not AML secondary to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. As induction therapy, the patients received idarubicin 8 mg/m2/d iv on days 1-5, cytarabine 100 mg/m2/d iv on days 1-7 ± lomustine, 200 mg\m2 orally at day 1. Patients achieving complete response (CR) or CRi received then a first consolidation with idarubicin 8 mg/m2/d iv on days 1-3 and cytarabine 100 mg/m2/d s/cut on days 1-5 ± lomustine, 80 mg orally at day 1, then 6 courses of reduced doses consolidation with idarubicin 8 mg/m2/d iv on day 1 and cytarabine100 mg/m2/d s/cut on days 1-5 ± lomustine, 40 mg orally at day 1. This was followed by 6 months maintenance therapy with alternating courses of purinethol and methotrexate. The primary objective of the study was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives were response rate, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), event-free (EFS) survival, as well as safety. Results: From February 2008 to December 2011, 459 patients were enrolled and 424 were evaluable. The median age of analyzed patients was 68 yo (60-81), 58% were male. Cytogenetics was favorable (5.2%), intermediate (90.3%) or failure (4.5%). Overall, 26% of the patients had a favorable genotype based on NPM, CEBPa and FLT3 ITD mutational status. The two arms were comparable for pre-treatment characteristics. There were 3.7% induction deaths in the IC arm and 7.7% in the ICL arm (p=0.11). The rate of primary resistant AML was 21.4% after IC versus 7.7% after ICL (p<10-4). CR or CRi was achieved in 74.9% of IC patients versus 84.7% in ICL patients (p= 0.01). At two years, OS was much better than expected for such a population, and improved in the ICL arm at 56% versus 48% in the IC arm. As expected at this age, a significant number of events occurred after two years, resulting in the absence of statistical significant difference for OS over the whole period of follow-up. At two years, EFS was improved in the ICL arm at 41% versus 26% in the IC arm (p=0.01). The CIR at two years was 41.2% in the ICL arm versus 60.9% in the IC arm (p=0.003). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were significantly different between treatment arms after induction and after the first consolidation. Neutropenia <0.5 G/L was prolonged of 2 days in the ICL arm (23 versus 21 for the IC arm, p=0.0001) after induction and of 4 days (11 versus 7 for the IC arm, p<0.0001) after first consolidation. Thrombopenia < 20G/L was prolonged of 5 days in the ICL arm (19 versus 14 for the IC arm, p<0.001) after induction and of 7 days (11 versus 4 for the IC arm, p<0.001) after first consolidation. Conclusion: Thisschedule using the same drugs at decreasing doses during induction, consolidation and reinductions provided unusually good results in the IC arm, further improved in the ICL arm by the addition of lomustine, in fit elderly AML patients without unfavorable cytogenetics, with acceptable toxicity. The higher rate of CR, reduced relapse incidence and improved EFS in the ICL arm support the anti-leukemic effect of lomustine in elderly AML patients, even if it does not translate in a significantly prolonged long term overall survival. New strategies for maintenance therapy remain to be improved in this setting to sustain this positive effect. Disclosures Vey: Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Value of FGFR2 expression for advanced gastric cancer patients receiving pazopanib plus CapeOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Seung Kim ◽  
Young-Woong Won ◽  
Jung Hoon Kim ◽  
Joon Ho Park
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Prognostic Analysis ◽  
Tumor Tissues ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

65 Background: The aim of this study was to use immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine the effect of FGFR2 and VEGFR2 expression on treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic or recurrent advanced gastric cancer (AGC) receiving a combination of pazopanib with CapeOx (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Methods: We conducted a single-arm, open-label phase II study to determine the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of pazopanib with CapeOx in 66 patients with metastatic or recurrent AGC (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01130805). IHC analysis of FGFR2 and VEGFR2 was possible in 54 patients (81.8%). Results: Among 54 patients, the median age was 51.5 years (range, 23–72 years). Most patients were men (59.3%). Seven patients (13.5%) had tumor tissues that expressed FGFR2 by IHC. No patients had tumors that expressed VEGFR2. Among 7 patients with tumors with FGFR2 expression, 6 achieved partial response (PR) with a 85.7% response rate and one patient with stable disease. Among 47 patients with tumors without FGFR2 expression, one had complete response and 27 had PR (59.5%). A significant difference in PFS was seen between patients who were positive and negative for FGFR2 using IHC (8.5 vs. 5.6 months, p = 0.050). By prognostic analysis for PFS, only FGFR2 status by IHC (positive vs. negative) had significant prognostic value for predicting PFS. Conclusions: FGFR2 expression by IHC might be a useful biomarker for predicting treatment outcomes of patients with metastatic or recurrent AGC treated with a combination of pazopanib and CapeOx.

A randomized, open-label, phase II study of azacitidine (AZA) in combination with durvalumab in patients (pts) with previously untreated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7074-TPS7074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis R. Silverman ◽  
Hartmut Dohner ◽  
Herve Dombret ◽  
Ghulam J. Mufti ◽  
Richard M. Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Open Label Phase

TPS7074 Background: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) induce hematologic response in ~ 50% of higher-risk MDS pts; however, there are few treatment options for nonresponding pts at increased risk of AML progression and death. While older AML pts ineligible for HSCT have similar overall survival (OS) with AZA and chemotherapy (13.3 vs 12.2 months) (Döhner et al. Haematologica 2015;100:P566), there is an opportunity to further improve responses and OS in these pts. Blockade of the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway with immune checkpoint inhibitors is an emerging paradigm in anticancer therapy. PD-L1 is expressed on cells from AML and MDS pts; expression is upregulated on myeloblasts following HMA therapy (Yang et al. Leukemia 2014;28:1280) and during MDS transformation to AML (Ogata et al. Leuk Res 2012;36:1229). Durvalumab (MEDI-4736), a human anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, is well tolerated and induces durable responses in pts with solid tumors (Lutzky et al. JCO 2014;32:3001). This randomized, open-label, phase 2 study evaluates efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) AZA ± durvalumab in pts with higher-risk MDS and older pts with AML. Methods: Eligible MDS pts ( < 20% blasts) aged ≥ 18 years, with IPSS intermediate- or high-risk MDS, and AML pts (≥ 20% blasts) aged ≥ 65 years, are randomized 1:1 to receive either AZA 75 mg/m2 SC for 7/28 days or AZA 75 mg/m2 SC for 7/28 days plus durvalumab 1500 mg IV on day 1 of 28-day cycles. Pts are stratified by cytogenetic risk: intermediate- vs poor-risk AML, and intermediate- vs poor-/very-poor-risk MDS. Primary endpoint is overall response rate per IWG 2006 criteria in MDS pts, and proportion of pts achieving complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) per modified IWG 2003 criteria in AML pts. Other endpoints include safety, time to response, overall survival and PD-1/PD-L1 activity. Pts will be followed every 3 months until discontinuation. Target enrollment is 182 pts: 72 MDS pts and 110 AML pts. Enrollment began in June 2016 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02775903).

Phase II study of short CHOP-rituximab combination with early consolidation with ibritumomab-tiuxetan-Y90 (IT-Y90) in non-pretreated patients age 65 to 80 with CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6633-6633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Peyrade ◽  
Gerard Lepeu ◽  
Jocelyn Gal ◽  
Christophe Fruchart ◽  
Diane Coso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomised Study ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Pretreated Patients

6633 Background: IT-Y90was approved in follicular lymphoma, and some data indicates that it could be used in DLBCL. It has been reported that early TEP-TDM negativity is associated with a longer survival in DLBCL, which suggest that these patients could benefit of a less intensive protocol. Methods: We conducted an international, open-label, phase II non-randomised study, in patients aged between 65 and 80 with age-adjusted (aa) IPI score of 0 and 1 and CD20+ DLBCL. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 cycles of RCHOP14 followed by, in case of complete response (CR), an injection of IT-Y90. Results: Thirty patients (M/F= 1) were included. Median age was 72.6 years (range 65 - 80). Patients had a stage III/IV, elevated LDH and IPI=1 in 38%, 16.6 and 57% respectively. 25 patients received the full treatment. Five obtained an uncomplete FDG-PET response and were excluded after 2 RCHOP cycles. 23 patients received the full IT-Y90 dosage (0.4mCi/Kg) and two received the attenuated dosage (0.3mCi/Kg). Mean treatment time was 54 days (median 52; min 48-max 69). The CR rate after RCHOP treatment was 85% [95% CI: 65-94]. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was observed in 45% and 4%, respectively. Five patients experienced at least one febrile neutropenia. After IT-Y90, mean duration time for platelets <50G/l was 2.08 weeks (median 2; min 0-max 5). Two patients required platelet transfusion. With a median follow-up of 29.5 months [95% CI: 23-39], the estimated 3-year PFS was 90% [95% CI: 80-100] and the 3-year OS was 100% [95% CI: 100-100]. Among patients treated with 90Y-IT, only 3 relapsed were recorded (at 6, 16 and 24 months). Conclusions: this study suggested the feasibility, and efficacy of a short regimen including one injection of IT-Y90for selected DLBCL in complete response after 3 cycles of RCHOP14. This results need to be confirmed by further studies.

scholarly journals Improved Survival by Adding Lomustine to Conventional Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients With AML Without Unfavorable Cytogenetics: Results of the LAM-SA 2007 FILO Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (32) ◽  
pp. 3203-3210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Pigneux ◽  
Marie C. Béné ◽  
Louis-Rachid Salmi ◽  
Pierre-Yves Dumas ◽  
Jacques Delaunay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients has a poor prognosis. In an attempt to improve outcome for these patients, the prospective open-label phase III LAM-SA 2007 (Adding Lomustine to Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), and Allogeneic Transplantation for Patients From 60 to 65 Years Old) trial randomly assigned patients to a standard induction regimen with lomustine added or to a consolidation regimen with cytarabine and idarubicin. Patients and Methods Adults age 60 years or older with previously untreated AML who were fit to receive intensive chemotherapy and who were without unfavorable cytogenetics received standard chemotherapy with lomustine (idarubicin, cytarabine, and lomustine [ICL]) or without (idarubicin and cytarabine [IC]). The primary objective of the study was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives were response rate, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), event-free survival (EFS), and safety. Results From February 2008 to December 2011, 459 patients were enrolled. Comparing patients in the IC and ICL arms, complete response or complete response with incomplete recovery was achieved in 74.9% versus 84.7% ( P = .01). The proportional hazards assumption was rejected for OS ( P = .02), which led us to consider two separate time intervals: during and after induction. There was no significant difference between the two arms during induction, although induction deaths were 3.7% versus 7.7%, respectively ( P = .11). However, significantly better results were observed after induction with an improved 2-year OS of 56% in the ICL arm versus 48% in the IC arm ( P = .02). At 2 years, EFS was improved at 41% in the ICL arm versus 26% in the IC arm ( P = .01). The CIR at 2 years was 41.2% in the ICL arm versus 60.9% in the IC arm ( P = .003). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities, mostly hematologic, were significantly higher in the ICL arm ( P = .04), and fewer patients required a second treatment after ICL. Conclusion Adding lomustine to standard chemotherapy significantly improved the outcome of elderly patients with AML.

scholarly journals A first-in-human, phase 1 study of the NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 inhibitor TAS4464 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Shigehisa Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Open Label Phase

SummaryBackground This open-label, phase 1 study investigated TAS4464, a potent NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (JapicCTI-173,488; registered 13/01/2017). The primary objective was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was investigated using an accelerated titration design. Methods The starting 10-mg/m2 dose was followed by an initial accelerated stage (weekly dosing; n = 11). Based on liver function test (LFT) results, a 14-day, 20-mg/m2 dose lead-in period was implemented (weekly dosing with lead-in; n = 6). Results Abnormal LFT changes and gastrointestinal effects were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). DLTs with 56-mg/m2 weekly dosing occurred in 1/5 patients; five patients had grade ≥ 2 abnormal LFT changes at 40- and 56-mg/m2 weekly doses. Further dose escalation ceased because of the possibility of severe abnormal LFT changes occurring. DLTs with weekly dosing with lead-in occurred in 1/5 patients at a 56-mg/m2 dose; MTD could not be determined because discontinuation criteria for additional enrollment at that particular dose level were met. As no further enrollment at lower doses occurred, dose escalation assessment was discontinued. Serious treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and DLTs were all related to abnormal LFT changes, suggesting that TAS4464 administration could affect liver function. This effect was dose-dependent but considered reversible. Complete or partial responses to TAS4464 were not observed; one patient achieved prolonged stable disease. Conclusions MTD could not be determined due to TAS4464 effects on liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor-induced abnormal liver function is required. Trial registration number JapicCTI-173,488 (registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center). Registration date 13 January 2017

A phase I trial evaluating NBTXR3 activated by radiotherapy in combination with nivolumab or pembrolizumab in patients with advanced cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2590-2590
Author(s):  
Colette Shen ◽  
Jessica M. Frakes ◽  
Jiaxin Niu ◽  
Ari Rosenberg ◽  
Jared Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Intratumoral Injection ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label

2590 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1 are an effective treatment for a variety of cancers. However, the majority of patients (pts) exhibit resistance to ICIs. Overcoming this resistance represents a major challenge in immuno-oncology. Emerging evidence suggests radiation therapy (RT) produces an immunomodulatory effect that may act synergistically with ICIs. However, RT dose and ultimate efficacy are limited by toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. NBTXR3, a novel radioenhancer administered by direct intratumoral injection (ITI), is designed at the nanoscale to increase RT dose deposit within tumor cells and subsequent tumor cell killing, without increasing toxicity to surrounding healthy tissue. Preclinical data suggest NBTXR3/RT can trigger a local and systemic anti-tumor immune response and overcome anti-PD-1 resistance. NBTXR3/RT combined with anti-PD-1 may prime the immune system to increase the proportion of ICI responders, or convert ICI non-responders to responders. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase I trial [NCT03589339] to evaluate NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 in 3 cohorts: (1) Locoregional recurrent or recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) amenable to HN re-irradiation, and metastases from any primary cancer eligible for anti-PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) treatment specifically localized in the lung (2) or liver (3), respectively. Stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is delivered at tumor-site selective doses per standard practice. The primary objective is NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 recommended phase 2 dose in each cohort. Secondary objectives are anti-tumor response (objective response rate), safety and feasibility of NBTXR3 injection. Results: Nine pts have been treated: 3 HNSCC, 4 lung, 2 liver. 7/9 pts were anti-PD-1 non-responders. Overall tumor regression was observed in 8/9 pts. NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 resulted in tumor regression in 6/7 pts who had progressed on prior anti-PD-1. A complete response in the injected lymph node lasting over 1 year was observed in 1 anti-PD-1 naïve pt. 2 SAEs related to anti-PD-1 and possibly related to NBTXR3 (G5 pneumonitis, G4 hyperglycemia) were observed in 1 anti-PD-1 naïve HNSCC pt and considered DLTs. This pt also experienced 2 other SAEs related to anti-PD-1 (G4 diabetic ketoacidosis, G4 acute kidney injury). SBRT-related safety profile was as expected. Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: Data from this first-in-human phase I trial evaluating NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 in pts with advanced cancers, show NBTXR3 ITI is feasible and well-tolerated. NBTXR3/RT/anti-PD-1 demonstrated promising signs of efficacy. Of particular interest, NBTXR3/RT can overcome ICI resistance in pts having progressed on prior anti-PD-1, supporting further development of NBTXR3 in combination with anti-PD-1 as well as other ICIs. Clinical trial information: NCT03589339.

scholarly journals Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: extended follow-up of POLLUX, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study

Leukemia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1875-1884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Darrell J. White ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
Gordon Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract In POLLUX, daratumumab (D) plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 63% and increased the overall response rate (ORR) versus Rd in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Updated efficacy and safety after >3 years of follow-up are presented. Patients (N = 569) with ≥1 prior line received Rd (lenalidomide, 25 mg, on Days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle; dexamethasone, 40 mg, weekly) ± daratumumab at the approved dosing schedule. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by next-generation sequencing. After 44.3 months median follow-up, D-Rd prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat population (median 44.5 vs 17.5 months; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35–0.55; P < 0.0001) and in patient subgroups. D-Rd demonstrated higher ORR (92.9 vs 76.4%; P < 0.0001) and deeper responses, including complete response or better (56.6 vs 23.2%; P < 0.0001) and MRD negativity (10–5; 30.4 vs 5.3%; P < 0.0001). Median time to next therapy was prolonged with D-Rd (50.6 vs 23.1 months; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31–0.50; P < 0.0001). Median PFS on subsequent line of therapy (PFS2) was not reached with D-Rd versus 31.7 months with Rd (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42–0.68; P < 0.0001). No new safety concerns were reported. These data support using D-Rd in patients with RRMM after first relapse.

Olanzapine for Prevention of Vomiting in Children and Adolescents Receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: Investigator-Initiated, Randomized, Open-Label Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (32) ◽  
pp. 3785-3793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramavath D. Naik ◽  
Sreenivas V ◽  
Vishwajeet Singh ◽  
Ashwati S. Pillai ◽  
Deepa Dhawan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Acute Period ◽  
Open Label Trial

PURPOSE Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a significant toxicity of chemotherapy. Olanzapine is recommended in adult patients for the prevention of CINV but has not been prospectively investigated in children. METHODS This investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label trial evaluated olanzapine in children (ages 5-18 years) scheduled to receive the first cycle of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). All participants received aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone during and 2 days after chemotherapy. Participants in the study group additionally received oral olanzapine 0.14 mg/kg/day (rounded to the nearest 2.5 mg; maximum, 10 mg) during the chemotherapy block and 3 days postchemotherapy. The primary objective was to compare complete response (CR) rates (no vomiting and no rescue medication) between the groups in the acute, delayed, and overall periods. Nausea comparison and safety evaluation were secondary and additional objectives, respectively. The collection of outcomes and adverse events was performed daily until the completion of the overall period. RESULTS A total of 240 patients underwent randomization. We performed a modified intention-to-treat analysis on 231 patients (116 in the control group and 115 in the study group). A higher proportion of patients in the olanzapine group achieved CR in the acute period (78% v 59%; P = .001), delayed period (74% v 47%; P < .001) and overall period (64% v 38%; P < .001) than in the control group. The proportion of patients with no nausea was significantly higher in the olanzapine group in the acute period (74% v 52%; P < .001), delayed period (74% v 47%; P < .001), and overall period (64% v 37%; P < .001). Grade 1/2 somnolence was greater in the olanzapine group (35% v 11%; P < .001). There was no grade 3/4 somnolence reported. CONCLUSION Olanzapine significantly improved CR rates for vomiting in children receiving the first cycle of HEC.

Disease stabilization (SD) as a surrogate end-point in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with erlotinib (E) or gefitinib (G)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18115-18115 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Pronzato ◽  
M. Loprevite ◽  
A. Brianti ◽  
C. Defferrari ◽  
G. Catania ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Nsclc Patients

18115 Background: One retrospective study (Hotta K, Ann Oncol 2005), investigating the prognosis of patients (pts) obtaining SD as best response with G treatment, has demonstrated that both progression-free survival (PFS) and survival (S) were significantly longer than those in pts with progressive disease (PD). The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the PFS and S outcome in pts with advanced NSCLC who achieved SD or partial response (PR) after treatment with E or G. Methods: Pooled data from 62 pts, entered into an open label phase II program of E (n=31) and a compassionate-use program of G (n=31), were retrospectively analyzed. E and G were given orally at 150 and 250 mg per day respectively and were continued until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity or patient’s refusal. Results: Pts characteristics: median age 69 years (42–85); females= 21 pts (34%); never/former smokers= 16/38 pts (26/61%); adenocarcinoma/BAC= 35/10 pts (56/16%); PS 0/1= 18/38 pts (29/61%). In 16 pts (26%) E or G were given as first-line therapy; 21 pts (34%) had received =2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Six pts (10%) achieved a PR and 18 pts (29%) obtained SD. TTP and OS in pts obtaining PR and SD were comparable: 7 vs 5.5 and 9.7 vs 9.1 months respectively. In progressing pts median TTP and OS were 1.7 and 3.7 months. Conclusions: Our findings indicate the importance of achieving disease control with both E and G treatment. Pts obtaining SD had a similar PFS and S compared with those having PR. An analysis of the role of mutational status and other biomarkers in predicting clinical outcome is currently underway. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document