scholarly journals Safety and efficacy evaluation of low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for prophylaxis of Pneumocystis pneumonia in HIV uninfected patients undergoing hemodialysis: a retrospective observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanae Yamashita ◽  
Yoshimitsu Shimomura ◽  
Hiroaki Ikesue ◽  
Nobuyuki Muroi ◽  
Akihiro Yoshimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Pneumocystis Pneumonia ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Discontinuation Rate ◽  
Continuous Variables

Abstract Background Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a potentially life-threatening infection. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is considered as the first regimen for PCP prophylaxis according to several guidelines. The recommended prophylactic dose of TMP-SMX has been determined based on patients with normal renal function, but the appropriate dosage for patients undergoing hemodialysis is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose TMP-SMX in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Methods HIV-uninfected adult patients who were undergoing hemodialysis and administered TMP-SMX for PCP prophylaxis, were included, and divided into standard-dose (≥6 single strength (SS, TMP-SMX 80 mg/400 mg tablets/week) and low-dose groups (< 6 SS tablets/week). The endpoints were cumulative incidence of PCP and cumulative discontinuation rate of TMP-SMX due to adverse events. For comparison of the groups, we employed the chi-squared test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Risk factors for the endpoints were evaluated using the Cox Fine and Gray method. Results The median age of the 81 patients included in the study was 67 years (IQR: 60–76 years), and 52 patients (64.2%) were men. No patients in either group developed PCP during the observation period. The yearly cumulative incidence of discontinuation was 12.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.027–0.29) in the low-dose group and 35.6% (95% CI: 0.20–0.52) in the standard-dose group (P = 0.019). The adjusted hazard ratio of the low-dose group compared to standard-dose group was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.04–0.86, P = 0.032). Conclusions None of the study patients developed PCP, and the cumulative discontinuation rate of TMP-SMX due to adverse events was significantly lower in the low-dose group compared to that in the standard-dose group (P = 0.032). These results indicate that low-dose TMP-SMX is an appropriate regimen to maintain a balance between PCP prophylaxis and prevention of adverse events due to TMP-SMX administration. These findings can guide health care professionals to determine TMP-SMX dosage when considering PCP prophylaxis for patients undergoing hemodialysis.

scholarly journals P125: Low dose intravenous ketorolac in renal colic, a pilot randomized controlled trial

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S109-S110
Author(s):  
J. Chao ◽  
P. Brasher ◽  
K. Cheung ◽  
R. Sharma ◽  
K. Badke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Renal Colic ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Recruitment Rate ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are first-line analgesics for emergency department (ED) patients with renal colic. Lower doses of intravenous (IV) ketorolac may provide similar pain relief to standard dosing in patients with acute pain. Patients with renal colic may be at increased risk of acute kidney injury; exposing them to lower doses of NSAIDs may put them at lower risk while providing equally effective analgesia. We conducted a pilot study to determine the feasibility of a randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of low with standard ketorolac dosing in ED patients with suspected renal colic. The primary objective was to demonstrate the ability to achieve an enrolment target of 2 patients per week. Methods: We enrolled a convenience sample of adults presenting to an academic urban ED with unilateral flank pain suspected to be renal colic. We randomized patients to 10 mg (low dose, intervention) or 30 mg (standard dose, control). Participants, treating physicians and nurses, and researchers were blinded to treatment allocation. Our main feasibility outcome was the recruitment rate. Secondary outcomes were changes in pain scores (0-10) at 30 and 120 minutes post-ketorolac administration, vital signs, adverse events and ED length of stay. Results: We approached 82 patients, of whom 47 (57.3%) were eligible. Of these, 36 consented to participating and 30 were randomized. The proportion of screened patients who were enrolled was 36.6% (30/82). We completed enrolment over a 21-week period, with an average recruitment rate of 1.5 patients/week (range 0-4). The average baseline pain score for all participants was 6.9 (SD = 2.1). At 30 minutes post-ketorolac administration, the low dose group had a mean pain reduction of 2.0 points compared to a pain reduction of 1.7 in standard dose group (difference = 0.3, 90% CI: -0.7 to 1.4). Conclusion: These preliminary results support the possibility that low dose ketorolac may be efficacious in this patient population. We did not meet our target recruitment of 2 patients per week as this was primarily due to restricted recruitment hours. To successfully conduct a larger trial, we would need to expand both recruitment hours and the number of sites.

Comparative Analysis on Low- and Standard-Dose Regimes of Alteplase Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Efficacy and Safety

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 68-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangjian Zhao ◽  
Tingfen Huang ◽  
Mei Zheng ◽  
Yansen Cui ◽  
Yunyong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Thrombolytic Therapy ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Intravenous Alteplase

Objective: This study analyzed the efficacy and safety of low-dose and standard-dose alteplase intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: Patients with AIS who underwent intravenous alteplase thrombolysis from July 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed and correspondingly divided into low-dose (0.6–0.89 mg/kg) group and standard-dose group (0.9 mg/kg) according to alteplase dosage. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days after onset. The safety index was the mortality at 90 days after onset and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) within 7 days. Results: A total of 1,486 patients were included (1,115 cases in low-dose group and 371 cases in standard-dose group). There were no significant differences in baseline data between the 2 groups. As mRS, good outcome rate as well as mortality rate in both groups had no significant difference (36.1 vs. 37.6%; χ2 = 10.882, p = 0.890; 5.5 vs. 7.3%; χ2 = 2.163, p = 0.076), but the incidence of SICH in low-dose group was significantly lower than that of the standard-dose group (2.2 vs. 5.9%; χ2 = 3.157, p = 0.001). Conclusion: The efficacy of low-dose alteplase intravenous thrombolytic therapy for AIS was equivalent to the standard-dose regimen but with higher safety.

scholarly journals Low-Dose Decitabine Plus Venetoclax Maintenance Therapy Can Decrease the Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for MRD Positive High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 33-33
Author(s):  
Yunxiong Wei ◽  
Yaqing Cao ◽  
Xin Jin ◽  
Xiaoyuan He ◽  
Rui Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplasia (MDS) are usually associated with poor outcomes, especially in high-risk AML/MDS. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curable option for patients suffering from high-risk AML/MDS. However, there were still many patients relapsed after allo-HSCT, especially for some patients are MRD positive before transplantation. Novel therapy to prevent replase is urgently needed. Both BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax (VEN) and hypomethylating agent, decitabine (DEC) possess significant antitumor activity effects against AML/MDS. Administration DEC has been shown to ameliorate GVHD and boost GVL post-transplantation. Several clinical trials have also shown that venetoclax plus decitabine can be a safety and effective salvage treatment for patients with AML/MDS relapsing after allo-HSCT. We therefore conducted a prospective study (ChiCTR1900025374) to exam the tolerability and efficacy of a maintenance therapy low-dose decitabine (LDEC) plus VEN to prevent relapse after allo-HSCT for MRD positive high-risk AML/MDS patients. To our knowledge, this is the first report of venetoclax combined decitabine in this setting. Methods: Six patients with MRD positive high-risk AML (n=5) /MDS(n=1) post transplantation were recruited. Around day 100 post transplantation, all patients received LDEC (15mg/m2 for 3 days) followed by VEN (200mg) on day 1 to 21. Two months is a cycle. The primary end points of this study were rates of Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), incidence of cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), incidences of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and incidences of viral infection after allo-HSCT. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis Results: Two of the six patients were partial remission (PR) before transplantation, and the remaining 4 patients were MRD+ before transplantation. The median follow-up was 16 (11-26.5) months. Both 2-year OS and 2-year EFS were 83%. The median 2-year EFS time was 16(9-26.5) months, and five patients still EFS alive at the time of this writing. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse after LDEC+VEN was 17% and 2-year non-relapse mortality was 0%. No tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was observed. The most common AEs were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, and fatigue. Grade 2 or 3 adverse events were observed in 33% (2/6). No grade&gt;3 AEs were observed. Acute (any grade) and chronic (limited or extensive) graft-versus-host disease occurred in 67% and 17% of patients, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of CMV viremia and EBV viremia were 33.3% and 16.7%, respectively. Conclusion: We conclude LDEC+VEN can be administered safely after allo-HSCT, without evidence for increased incidence of GVHD, and this combination demonstrates decreased relapse for MRD positive high-risk AML/MDS patients. This novel maintenance therapy may be a promising way to prevent replase for MRD positive high-risk AML/MDS patients, and the clinical benefits need to be assessed in a comparative prospective trial. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Comparative efficacy of reduced or standard doses of lenograstim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and transplantation: A randomized study in patients undergoing autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7099-7099
Author(s):  
M. Ozturk ◽  
F. Arpaci ◽  
S. Ataergin ◽  
A. Ozet ◽  
T. Cetin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Pbsc Mobilization

7099 Background: 10 microg/kg/day of filgrastim and lenograstim have been recommended for mobilization of CD34+ cells without associated chemotherapy. However,in our previous randomized study we demonstrated that a 7.5 microg/kg/day dose of lenograstim has been as efficacious as 10 microg/kg/day of filgrastim. In this study, we investigated whether a reduced dose of lenograstim is equavalent to standard dose for autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and transplantation. Methods: A total of 49 consecutive patients were randomized to either low dose (7.5 microg/kg/day, n = 24) or standard dose (10 microg/kg/day, n = 25) of lenograstim. These two groups were similar in regard to disease, sex, body weight, body surface area, conditioning regimens, previous chemotherapy cycles and radiotherapy. Each dose of lenograstim was administered for 4 consecutive days. The first PBSC apheresis was done on the 5th day. In the posttransplant period, lenograstim was given at 5 microg/kg/day until leukocyte engraftment. Results: Successful mobilization with the first apheresis, was achieved in 10/24 (42%) patients in low dose group versus 14/25 (56%) patients in standard dose group. No significant difference was seen in the median number of CD34+cells mobilized, as well as the median number of apheresis, median volume of apheresis, percentage of CD34+ cells, and CD34+ cell number. Leukocyte and platelet engraftments, the number of days requiring G-CSF and parenteral antibiotics, the number of transfusions were similar in both groups in the posttransplant period. Conclusions: Lenograstim 7.5 microg/kg/day is as efficious as Lenograstim 10 microg/kg/day for autologous PBSC mobilization and transplantation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Predictors of immune-related adverse events associated with checkpoint inhibitors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15159-e15159
Author(s):  
Alhareth Alsayed ◽  
Ashish Manne ◽  
Daisy E Escobar ◽  
Gaurav Sharma ◽  
Pranitha Prodduturvar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Hematological Parameters ◽  
White Blood Count ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Grade 3

e15159 Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAE) remain a significant challenge with the expansion of checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) indications. Unlike previous studies published, we investigated risk factors for irAE development, including lymphocytes and neutrophils counts in lung cancer and melanoma treated with all available ICIs in current clinical practice. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted at the University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute. Between 2015-2019. A total of 160 patients with a diagnosis of melanoma (N = 54) or lung cancer (N = 106) who received at least two doses of ICI including ipilimumab (15%), nivolumab (32%), pembrolizumab (35%), dual nivolumab/ipilimumab (5%), durvalumab (9%) and atezolizumab (4%). The patient's baseline characteristics were extracted with irAE (grade 3/4) details and survival outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used, Fisher exact test to compare categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables using JMP software. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 17-93), with 51% females. Race distribution with 76% Caucasians and 26% African Americans. Around 30% of the cohort was treated for recurrence, and 39% did receive prior systemic chemotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.5 months (m) for melanoma and 16 m for lung cancer with CI 95% [16-24] and [15-23], respectively. Twenty-nine (29%) percent of the cohort (N = 46) had grade 3/4 irAEs. Median of baseline hematological parameters including total white blood count (WBC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), ANC to ALC ratio, and platelet to ALC ratio of these patients were not statistically different from the cohort without grade 3/4 irAEs. Interestingly, if a patient has baseline ALC < 1K/μL, the risk of irAE recurrence is low when ICI is re-initiated, p = .0143 (after symptomatic recovery from irAEs). Conclusions: Irrespective of ICI used, baseline lymphocyte count, and its relation to other blood counts have no clear impact on irAE. Larger cohorts or prospective studies are needed to make stronger conclusions about the relationship between the immune system and the occurrence of irAEs

The study of the treatment efficacy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer of low dose abiraterone with food.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17571-e17571
Author(s):  
Kanta Makphanchareonkit ◽  
Thitiya Sirisinha Dejthevaporn ◽  
Dittapol Muntham ◽  
Phichai Chansriwong
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response

e17571 Background: Abiraterone acetate and prednisolone (AAP) + ADT has been approved for treatment metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in the standard dose 1,000 mg with fasting state. Data in Ramathibodi hospital showed patients who had treated with standard dose of Abiraterone acetate (AA); had PSA response 47.83%. Previous studies showed using low dose AA of 250 mg with food had the non-inferiority results in efficacy. AA was not be reimbursed in Thailand, so the ability to use a highly effective drug at a quarter of the dose, could help in patient accessibility to cancer treatments. We sought to test the hypothesis that low-dose AA with food would have the comparable activity in Thai CRPC patients in both of the pre-Docetaxel and post Docetaxel treatment groups, and exploring the quality of life (QOL) of these patients. Methods: An observational cohort enrolled newly diagnosed metastasis CRPC at Ramathibodi hospital from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019. Patients were assigned to AA (250mg) with actual daily life meal. We collected the data of serum PSA and the adverse events every 4 weeks for 4 months. The QOL data was collected with the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) questionnaire which were done at baseline and every 4 weeks. The primary end point was PSA response that defined as PSA decreased ≥ 50% from PSA level at baseline. The secondary endpoint were the depth of PSA change, QOL and adverse events by using Fisher's exact test and T-test. Results: 21 patients were enrolled. At 12 weeks, there were 11 patients (52.38%) achieved 50% PSA response and 6 patients (28.57%) achieved 90% PSA response. The adverse events occurred 23.8%, and mostly were mild grade. The adverse events were comparable with the historical data in standard dose of AA. Low dose AA has significantly shown the improvement in quality of life from baseline (p < 0.001), and especially the significant improvement in pre-Docetaxel subgroup. Conclusions: Low-dose AA with food has good efficacy in PSA response, adverse events and QOL. Moreover, low dose AA shows more efficacy especially in pre-Docetaxel mCRPC patients. Low dose AA may be helping in reducing cost of cancer care, enabling in delivering affordable cancer care and increasing value of treatment.

A comparison of CD34+ mobilization effects of standard dose pegfilgrastim (Peg) versus low-dose peg combined with plinabulin (Plin).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20000-e20000
Author(s):  
Douglas W. Blayney ◽  
Lan Huang ◽  
Ramon W. Mohanlal
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Bone Pain ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Cell Counts

e20000 Background: Plin is a novel, small molecule immune-enhancing agent with in vitro anticancer activity currently in Phase (Ph) 3 clinical trials for NSCLC treatment and Chemotherapy (Chemo)-Induced Neutropenia (CIN). Single agent (SA) Plin is equally effective as Peg for the prevention of CIN, however does not cause bone pain and is given on the same day of Chemo by 30 min IV infusion, 30 min after Chemo (Blayney ASH 2018). SA Plin also mobilizes CD34+ cells to clinically relevant levels (Blayney ASH 2019). Plin has been administered to > 600 patients (pts) and has a favorable safety/tolerability profile. In clinical practice, Peg dose is often reduced to 3 mg in patients (pts) experiencing side effects with standard dose (6 mg) Peg, such as bone pain, myalgia and leucocytosis (Kim ASCO 2010; Goodman Oncology Times 2008; Lacovelli JHOP 2012; Lower Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018). We evaluated CD34+ cell counts and adverse events (AE) with low dose Peg combined with Plin vs full dose Peg. Methods: In a subset of Breast Cancer pts in the CIN Ph 2 trial BPI-2358-106 (NCT0329457) receiving TAC (taxotere (75), doxorubicin (50 ) and cyclophosphamide (500) mg/m2, pts also received either Peg 6mg (n = 7) or low dose peg ( n = 9, of which 7pts received 3mg and 2 pts 1.5 mg Peg) combined with Plin (20 mg/m2). CD34+ counts were obtained by central laboratory FACS analysis (Covance) at screening (SC), Day (D) 6,8 and 21 cycle 1 (see table below) and AE frequency was collected. Results: Clinical trial information: NCT0329457 . Frequency of bone pain, myalgia and leukocytosis was numerically lower with low dose Peg/Plin vs 6mg Peg. Conclusions: Under highly myelosuppressive TAC Chemo conditions, CD34+ counts increased significantly (p < 0.03) vs predose SC in cycle 1 in the low dose Peg/Plin goup. CD34+ counts were not different for full dose Peg vs low dose Peg/Plin in cycle 1. Adverse Events were fewer with the low dose Peg/Plin. The Peg/Plin combination is worthy of test in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens. [Table: see text]

The TNT protocol: A phase II study using talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC), nivolumab (N) and trabectedin (T) as first, second/third line therapy for advanced sarcoma, including desmoid tumor and chordoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11572-TPS11572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Victoria S. Chua ◽  
Katherine Kim ◽  
Paul Stendahl Dy ◽  
Micaela Kristina Paz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Desmoid Tumor ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
System Organ Class ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Talimogene Laherparepvec ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Advanced Sarcoma

TPS11572 Background: Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC), an oncolytic HSV expressing huGMCSF, may be synergistic with trabectedin (T) and nivolumab (N) in treating advanced sarcoma. Objectives: (1) To evaluate the best overall response by RECIST v1.1, progression-free survival rate (PFS), and overall survival rate, (2) To determine the incidence of conversion of an unresectable tumor to a resectable one, and (3) To evaluate the incidence of adverse events related to the drug combination. Methods: This is an open label phase 2 study. A total of 40 patients will receive T (1.2 mg/m2 CIV over 24 hours q3 weeks), N (240 mg IV over 30 min q 2 weeks) and TVEC (intratumorally q 2 weeks according to tumor size). Eligible patients are those with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic sarcoma including desmoid tumor and chordoma, previously untreated or treated, with measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, and at least, one accessible tumor for intratumoral injection of TVEC. Currently, 31 of the 40 patients have been enrolled. Statistical Considerations: Continuous variables will be summarized by the sample size (n), mean, standard deviation, first and third quartiles, minimum and maximum. Categorical variables will be summarized by the n and percent in each category. Point estimates for efficacy endpoint incidences will be accompanied by a 2-sided 95% exact binomial CI. Time to event endpoints will be summarized descriptively using the KM method. Safety (incidence and severity of adverse events and significant laboratory abnormalities) will be performed on all patients (ITT population). Patient incidence of all treatment emergent AEs will be tabulated by system organ class and preferred term. Clinical trial information: 03886311 .

Combined Carbimazole-131I Treatment for Thyrotoxicosis

1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. McDougall ◽  
W. R. Greig
Keyword(s):  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Radioactive Iodine ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Antithyroid Drugs ◽  
131I Treatment ◽  
Therapeutic Regime ◽  
The Individual ◽  
To Receive

A sequential therapeutic regime was prescribed for 74 thyrotoxic patients. Every patient received carbimazole in conventional doses for 20 weeks; the average time to obtain control was 10.2 weeks. The patients although older than those usually treated with antithyroid drugs (range 38–68 years) showed no difference in the expected rate of control or in the recognised incidence of side effects. Following the carbimazole therapy the patients were alternatively allotted to receive standard or low (50% of standard) doses of 131I, the individual doses being calculated from simple formulae. After the radio-iodine all of the patients were treated with carbimazole for a further 20 weeks. Review of the patients after completion of the trial and subsequent follow up without therapy shows that 42.1 per cent of the standard dose group remain euthyroid after one therapy dose of 131I, 36.8 per cent have relapsed and 21.1 per cent have become hypothyroid. In the low dose group 44.4 per cent are euthyroid, 47.2 per cent have had a recurrence and 8.4 per cent have become hypothyroid. The results are discussed in the light of current views about the treatment of thyrotoxicosis with drugs and with radioactive iodine.

scholarly journals The Safety and Efficacy of Standard-Dose versus Low-Dose Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Mingjun Feng ◽  
Huaming Lin ◽  
Bin He ◽  
Binhao Wang ◽  
Xiaomin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus ◽  
Once Daily

Background. Data comparing different doses of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) regarding resolution of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are scarce. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of standard-dose versus low-dose NOACs in patients with nonvalvular AF and LAAT. Methods. Patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before interventional procedures for the detection of LAAT and treated with NOACs from October 2014 to September 2020 in Ningbo First Hospital were retrospectively screened. The study population was divided into two groups according to the doses of NOACs: standard-dose group (dabigatran 150 mg, twice daily; rivaroxaban 20 mg, once daily) and low-dose group (aged ≥75 years, body weight <50 kg, or creatinine clearance <50 mL/min; dabigatran 110 mg, twice daily; rivaroxaban 15 mg, once daily). Repeated TEE was performed 1, 2, and 3 months later. The rate of LAAT completely resolved and incidence of thromboembolic and major bleeding events were compared between the two groups. Results. A total of 24 patients were included, 14 patients in the standard-dose group and 10 in the low-dose group. After 3 months, LAAT was completely resolved in 12 out of 14 (85.7%) and 8 out of 10 (80%) patients treated with standard- and low-dose NOACs, respectively. The rate of LAAT completely resolved was comparable between groups. No thromboembolic or major bleeding events occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion. Low-dose NOACs are a safe and effective option for the treatment of LAAT in some special subset patients. However, the results warrant validation in a prospective study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document