Clinicopathologic Features and Response to Therapy of NRG1 Fusion–Driven Lung Cancers: The eNRGy1 Global Multicenter Registry

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.03307
Author(s):  
Alexander Drilon ◽  
Michael Duruisseaux ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Masaoki Ito ◽  
Christina Falcon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
The United States ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Domain ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Platinum Doublet

PURPOSE Although NRG1 fusions are oncogenic drivers across multiple tumor types including lung cancers, these are difficult to study because of their rarity. The global eNRGy1 registry was thus established to characterize NRG1 fusion–positive lung cancers in the largest and most diverse series to date. METHODS From June 2018 to February 2020, a consortium of 22 centers from nine countries in Europe, Asia, and the United States contributed data from patients with pathologically confirmed NRG1 fusion–positive lung cancers. Profiling included DNA-based and/or RNA-based next-generation sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Anonymized clinical, pathologic, molecular, and response (RECIST v1.1) data were centrally curated and analyzed. RESULTS Although the typified never smoking (57%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (57%), and nonmetastatic (71%) phenotype predominated in 110 patients with NRG1 fusion–positive lung cancer, further diversity, including in smoking history (43%) and histology (43% nonmucinous and 6% nonadenocarcinoma), was elucidated. RNA-based testing identified most fusions (74%). Molecularly, six (of 18) novel 5′ partners, 20 unique epidermal growth factor domain–inclusive chimeric events, and heterogeneous 5′/3′ breakpoints were found. Platinum-doublet and taxane-based (post–platinum-doublet) chemotherapy achieved low objective response rates (ORRs 13% and 14%, respectively) and modest progression-free survival medians (PFS 5.8 and 4.0 months, respectively). Consistent with a low programmed death ligand-1 expressing (28%) and low tumor mutational burden (median: 0.9 mutations/megabase) immunophenotype, the activity of chemoimmunotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy was poor (ORR 0%/PFS 3.3 months and ORR 20%/PFS 3.6 months, respectively). Afatinib achieved an ORR of 25%, not contingent on fusion type, and a 2.8-month median PFS. CONCLUSION NRG1 fusion–positive lung cancers were molecularly, pathologically, and clinically more heterogeneous than previously recognized. The activity of cytotoxic, immune, and targeted therapies was disappointing. Further research examining NRG1-rearranged tumor biology is needed to develop new therapeutic strategies.

Uracil-ftorafur: an oral fluoropyrimidine active in colorectal cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 3461-3475 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Sulkes ◽  
S E Benner ◽  
R M Canetta
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
The United States ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Oral Route ◽  
Western World ◽  
Oral Fluoropyrimidine ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

PURPOSE AND DESIGN This review describes the early clinical development of uracil-ftorafur (UFT), an oral fluoropyrimidine, designed in 1978 by adding uracil to ftorafur. The review focuses on the treatment of colorectal cancer and summarizes the Japanese experience and the phase I and II trials performed in the United States and Europe. RESULTS Clinical trials of UFT published in the Western world have included 581 patients with colorectal cancer. UFT has been administered in these trials as a single agent or biomodulated by leucovorin (LV). UFT was administered daily in split doses for periods that ranged from 14 to 28 days. The activity of oral UFT in large-bowel cancer when administered with oral LV (approximately 50 mg/dose) has resulted in objective response rates of approximately 40%. Response rates of approximately 25% (range, 17% to 39%) were reported when UFT was administered as a single agent or with lower doses of LV. The highest dose-intensities of UFT are achieved with 28-day schedules of administration. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of UFT with this schedule, when administered concomitantly with oral LV 150 mg daily, is 300 mg/m2 daily. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of UFT has generally been diarrhea. Other commonly described toxicities include nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and stomatitis. Myelosuppression occurs infrequently. Typically, hand-foot syndrome and neurologic toxicity are lacking. CONCLUSION UFT is a fluoropyrimidine active in colorectal cancer. The oral route of administration and improved safety profile represent important advantages over both conventional and infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) regimens.

scholarly journals Response to immune checkpoint inhibition as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic ROS1-rearranged lung cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9049-9049
Author(s):  
Noura J. Choudhury ◽  
Jaime Laurel Schneider ◽  
Tejas Patil ◽  
Viola Weijia Zhu ◽  
Debra A. Goldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Tumor Expression

9049 Background: ROS1 fusions are oncogenic drivers in various cancers types, including 1-3% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Immunotherapy approvals for NSCLC include ROS1-rearranged carcinomas, but the activity of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy (chemo-ICI) therapy, as well as the immunophenotypic characteristics of these tumors, have not been described in a large data set. Methods: In this multi-institutional study, patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC were identified retrospectively. Tumor PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were assessed as part of routine clinical care. In patients who received ICI monotherapy or chemo-ICI in the metastatic setting, time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v. 1.1) were calculated. TTD was assessed with Kaplan-Meier methods; patients remaining on treatment were censored at last follow up. Results: 184 patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC were identified. Among 146 PD-L1 evaluable cases, PD-L1 expression was < 1% in 60 (41%), 1-49% in 35 (24%) and ≥50% in 51 (35%) tumors. Ninety-two of 100 (92%) TMB-evaluable tumors had < 10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb). TMB was significantly lower for ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs (n = 97) vs. ROS1-wild type tumors (n = 5,380) evaluated with next-generation sequencing using MSK-IMPACT (median 2.6 vs. 5.9 mut/Mb, p < 0.001). Twenty-eight patients received ICI monotherapy and 11 patients received chemo-ICI. The median TTD was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.0-4.2; n = 28) for single-agent ICI therapy and 10 months (95% CI: 4.7-14.1; n = 11) for chemo-ICI therapy. The ORR was 13% (2/16 RECIST-evaluable; 95% CI: 2-38%) for ICI monotherapy and 83% (5/6 RECIST-evaluable; 95% CI: 36-100%) for chemo-ICI therapy. There was no difference in PD-L1 tumor expression (p = 0.9) or TMB (p = 0.8) between responders and non-responders and no correlation between PD-L1 tumor expression (rho = 0.16, p = 0.6) or TMB (rho = 0.03, p = 0.9) and maximum change in sum of target lesions. Conclusions: Most ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs have low or no PD-L1 expression and low TMB. The activity of checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy is disappointing in ROS1-driven NSCLC. In contrast, combination chemoimmunotherapy can achieve clinically meaningful activity.

A multi-institutional phase II open-label study of AMG 479 in advanced carcinoid and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4125-4125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Kulke ◽  
Jennifer A. Chan ◽  
David P. Ryan ◽  
Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt ◽  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Intermediate Grade ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Pancreatic Net

4125 Background: The IGF pathway is thought play an important role in neuroendocrine tumor progression. We therefore investigated AMG 479, a human monocolonal antibody against IGF1-R, in patients with metastatic progressive carcinoid and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETS). Methods: This open-label phase II study enrolled patients (≥18 yrs) with metastatic low and intermediate-grade carcinoid and pancreatic NETs. Key inclusion criteria included evidence of progressive disease (by RECIST) within 12 months of enrollment, ECOG PS 0-2, and fasting blood sugar <160mg/dL. Prior treatments were allowed, and concurrent somatostatin analog therapy was permitted as long as patients remained on a stable dose. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: 60 patients (30 carcinoid, 30 pancreatic NET) were treated with AMG 479 18mg/kg every 3 weeks and 54 patients were evaluable for response. There were no objective responders by RECIST. When best response to therapy was evaluated, 10/27 (37%) evaluable carcinoid patients and 8/26 (31%) evaluable pancreatic NET patients experienced 1-29% tumor shrinkage, while 17/27 (63%) of the carcinoid patients and 15/26 (58%) of the pancreatic NET patients appeared to experience continued tumor growth. Median PFS was 6.3 months (95% CI 4.2-12.6) for the entire cohort; 10.5 months for carcinoid patients and 4.2 months for pancreatic NET patients. The OS rate at 12 months was 70% (55%-81%) for the entire cohort. Median OS has not been reached. Treatment related grade 3/4 AEs were rare and consisted of hyperglycemia (4%), neutropenia (4%), thrombocytopenia (4%) and infusion reaction (1%). Conclusions: While well-tolerated, single-agent AMG 479 was not found to result in major tumor responses among patients with metastatic low-intermediate grade carcinoid or pancreatic NET. Subgroup analysis to identify characteristics of patients who may have benefited from therapy with AMG 479 is ongoing.

A phase 3 open-label, randomized, multicenter study of Imprime PGG in combination with cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS787-TPS787
Author(s):  
Richard Dale Huhn ◽  
Jamie Lowe ◽  
Michele Grady ◽  
Corina Candiani Taitt ◽  
Michele Anne Gargano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
The United States ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3

TPS787 Background: Imprime PGG (Imprime) is a novel immune modulator (complex carbohydrate biologic), which harnesses innate immune cells to enhance killing of antibody-targeted tumor cells. In a phase 2 single-arm clinical trial in mCRC, the combination of Imprime with cetuximab resulted in 24% ORR, 62% disease control rate (DCR), and median time to progression (TTP) of 12 wks (Tamayo ME, Ann Onc 2010), representing approximate 100% increases vs historical control (Cunningham, NEJM 2004). ORR was 45%, DCR, 82% and TTP, 24 wks in pts with KRAS WT tumors (post hoc analysis). Single-agent cetuximab has been shown to improve objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expressing, KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based therapy or are intolerant to irinotecan. The mechanism of action of cetuximab is thought to rely on competitive blockade of endogenous ligand binding and downstream signaling, internalization and down regulation of EGFR, as well as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (Erbitux SmPC). The current trial, sponsored by Biothera (registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01309126) is to confirm these findings in phase 3. Methods: Eligible pts will have had prior oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based therapy or be intolerant to irinotecan, and will meet key inclusion criteria including measurable disease and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. In a 2:1 randomization, stratified by geographic region, prior chemotherapy and site, approximately 795 pts will receive weekly open-label Imprime plus cetuximab or cetuximab alone. The primary endpoint of the study is OS and primary analysis will occur when ~709 deaths have occurred. Secondary endpoints include PFS, ORR (based on RECIST 1.1), quality of life, safety and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints include biomarker analyses. Pt screening and enrollment is underway in the United States and Europe. Clinical trial information: NCT01309126.

Association of LRP1B pathogenic genomic alterations with favorable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple tumor types.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3007-3007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Landon Carter Brown ◽  
Ramy Sedhom ◽  
Eric B Schwartz ◽  
Jason Zhu ◽  
Chester Kao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types

3007 Background: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1b (LRP1b) is a putative tumor suppressor and one of the most frequently altered genes in cancer. Our prior single-center work suggested that LRP1B alterations may enrich for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in solid tumors including prostate cancer; however, validation of these findings is needed. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with LRP1B alterations (on tissue-based next-generation sequencing panels) treated with ICI at Duke, Johns Hopkins (JHU), and University of Michigan (UM). The primary objective was to assess the association between objective response rate (ORR) to ICI and pathogenic LRP1B alterations, defined as deletions or truncating alterations, when compared with LRP1B variants of undetermined significance (VUS), defined as missense mutations not predicted to be pathogenic in COSMIC. Missense changes with a COSCMIC FATHMM score of > 0.8 were categorized separately as likely pathogenic. Summary statistics, ORR, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results: 101 patients (44 Duke, 35 JHU, 22 UM) with LRP1B alterations were treated with ICI. Median age was 61 (range 32-82). The most common tumor types by alteration (pathogenic or likely pathogenic/VUS%) were lung (33/47%), GI (17/13%), prostate (11/7%), sarcoma (2/9%), melanoma (11/0%), and others (26/24%). 93% of patients received single-agent PD-(L)1 inhibition. The ORR for patients with either pathogenic/likely pathogenic alterations, or VUS alterations was 57% and 18%, respectively. After excluding MSI-high or TMB-high ( > 10 mut/Mb) tumors, ORR was 14/25 (56%) and 6/36 (17%), respectively. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic LRP1B alterations were associated with longer PFS (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.63) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.95). Conclusions: This multicenter study shows impressive and durable objective response rates to ICI for patients harboring pathogenic LRP1B alterations when compared to those with LRP1B VUS, independent of TMB/MSI status. Further mechanistic insights and prospective validation studies are warranted. [Table: see text]

Phase I/II study of vorolanib plus nivolumab in patients with thoracic malignancies: immunotherapy (IO) correlatives to differentiate responders from nonresponders.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21019-e21019
Author(s):  
Katy Beckermann ◽  
Christine M. Bestvina ◽  
Jennifer G. Whisenant ◽  
Hossein Borghaei ◽  
Taofeek Kunle Owonikoko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Activation Markers ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e21019 Background: VEGF inhibition is suggested to enhance innate T cell function, activate dendritic cells, block recruitment of regulatory T cells, and decrease myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Vorolanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is structurally similar to sunitinib but designed to improve safety without compromising efficacy. Response to checkpoint inhibitors in patients with thoracic tumors is limited, thus we designed this multi-institutional, phase I/II study (NCT03583086) to explore safety and efficacy of combining vorolanib and nivolumab. Here we present updated results in the NSCLC, thymic, and SCLC cohorts, including patients previously treated with single agent IO. Methods: The Phase I maximum tolerated dose was 200 mg vorolanib and 240 mg nivolumab q2w. Phase II is ongoing and uses a two-stage MinMax design to assess the objective response rate (RR) in SCLC, thymic carcinoma, and three NSCLC cohorts: 1) IO naïve; 2) primary refractory, defined as radiographic progression < 12 weeks of starting IO; and 3) acquired resistance, defined as achieving at least stable disease ≥12 weeks to IO followed by progression. Results: As of December 2019, 37 patients had enrolled, 38% female, 11% never smokers, median age 66. The disease control rate (DCR) across all cohorts is 65% (20/31 evaluable patients) and the RR is 13% (4/31). In the NSCLC cohort, the overall RR is 14% (3/21); the RR is 33% (2/6) in IO naïve patients, including 2 on therapy > 17 months. RR in the NSCLC patients with acquired resistance is 14% (1/7) with an 86% (6/7) DCR. No responses in the primary refractory cohort but the DCR is 50% (4/8). DCR in the SCLC and thymic cohorts is 40% (2/5) and 50% (2/4), respectively; 1 thymic patient had a partial response with a complete response in target lesions. Exploratory correlatives, including mass cytometry analysis and single cell gene expression, are being performed in order to understand changes in macrophages and T cell activation markers to differentiate the underlying biology of the tumor and the microenvironment between responders and nonresponders. Conclusions: The addition of vorolanib nearly doubled the RR in the IO naïve NSCLC patients compared to historical data with single agent nivolumab. Additionally, 67% of NSCLC patients with prior IO achieved at least stable disease, 1 patient with acquired resistance had a response. Correlatives that may help define biomarkers of response to therapy will be presented among different cohorts of patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03583086 .

Impact of KRAS mutational variant on response to immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21127-e21127
Author(s):  
Shelley Kuang ◽  
Sally C. M. Lau ◽  
Kieran Sharma ◽  
Juehea Lee ◽  
Malcolm Isaiah Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Lung Cancers ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Downstream Signaling

e21127 Background: KRAS alterations constitute the most common driver mutations in metastatic non-small cell lung cancers (mNSCLC) and occur in approximately 30% of patients. KRAS mutational subtype as well as the presence of co-mutations has been associated with altered activation of downstream signaling pathways in preclinical models. We hypothesize that different KRAS G12C mutational subsets will be associated with variable clinical outcome and response to therapy. To this end, we have performed a retrospective analysis of survival and treatment outcomes by KRAS mutation subtype (G12C vs non-G12C). Methods: A review of KRAS-mutated mNSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy between 2013 and 2020 was conducted. Patient demographics, smoking status, KRAS mutational subtype, co-mutations and PD-L1 status were collected. Overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed in each subgroup. Results: 98 KRAS mutant mNSCLC patients were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): 37% with a KRAS G12C mutation, 62% with a non-G12C mutation. Patients with a G12C mutation were more likely to be of Caucasian ancestry (86% vs 56%; p = 0.01) whereas all other characteristics were similar between the groups including smoking history, PD-L1 expression ≥50% (61% vs 40%) and the presence of a TP53 co-mutation (48% vs. 54%); all p > 0.05. Treatment patterns were similar between the groups, with PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy given in 86% vs 79% of KRAS G12C and non-G12C patients. Overall response rate was 51% vs 27% in G12C vs non-G12C (p = 0.03). PFS was superior in G12C mutants (19.6 months vs 4.0 months), even after adjusting for smoking history, TP53 co-mutation status and PD-L1 expression (adjusted HR 0.51; p = 0.02). In subgroup analyses, the superiority in PFS was driven by the G12C mutants with high PD-L1 expression (n = 19): 26.8 months in G12C, PD-L1 high vs 4.7 months in G12C, PD-L1 low vs. 4.7 months in KRAS transversion mutations, PD-L1 high vs 4.0 months in transversion mutations, PD-L1 low vs. 3.0 months in transition mutations; p < 0.001. Conclusions: The presence of a KRAS G12C mutation is associated with improved ORR and PFS after treatment with ICI compared to non-G12C mutations in mNSCLC. The greatest benefit in PFS was observed in the subgroup with G12C mutation and high PD-L1 expression. Differential activation of downstream signaling associated with specific KRAS codon 12 mutation variants may modulate the composition of the tumor immune microenvironment thereby contributing to the variable response to immunotherapy. Further understanding on these molecular mechanisms may direct the development of new treatment strategies in KRAS mutant lung cancers.

FCgamma Receptor Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Outcome of Treatment with Rituximab Followed by Active Immunotherapy with Mitumprotimut-T (FavId®, Id-KLH).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3416-3416 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Maloney ◽  
Barbara Pender ◽  
Erin McCarthy ◽  
Daniel P. Gold
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Active Immunotherapy ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

Abstract Background: Patient specific active idiotype immunotherapy with immunoglobulin idiotype is a promising new therapy for follicular NHL. Response to therapy may include both humoral and cellular anti-idiotypic immunity, but it is not clear which is most important. Prior studies have suggested that immunoglobulin FCgammaRIIIa (FCgRIIIa) polymorphisms at position 158 valine (V) or phenylalanine (F) effect the response to treatment with rituximab as well as outcomes from idiotype immunotherapy following objective response to chemotherapy. Here we present data assessing the correlation of FCgRIIIa polymorphisms and outcomes from idiotype immunotherapy following treatment with rituximab. Treatment: We determined the FCgRIIIa genotype using a SSCP method with genomic DNA isolated from 55 rituximab-naïve patients treated on a Phase II trial of mitumprotimut-T (FavId®, Id-KLH) (Koc et al, Blood, 2006; 108: #691). Four patients who progressed following rituximab and therefore did not receive mitumprotimut-T were excluded from this analysis. All 55 patients in this analysis had follicular NHL with a median age of 55 years. Thirty five patients were treatment naïve and 20 had relapsed following prior chemotherapy. Patients received rituximab (375mg/m2 i.v. weekly x 4) and those with stable or responding disease assessed at Week 11 received Id-KLH (1 mg s.q. monthly x 6) starting on Week 12 along with Leukine® (sargramostim, GM-CSF, 250 mcg, s.q.) on Days 1–4. Pts continued to receive booster injections on a reduced schedule, every other month x6 then quarterly thereafter, until disease progression. Radiological scans were performed every 3 months for the first 2 years of follow up, then every 6 months thereafter and reviewed centrally. Objective response and time to tumor progression (TTP) were assessed using modified IWG criteria (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol1999; 17:1244). Response at 3 months, best response, TTP and progression free survival (PFS) at 1 year and 3.5 years were all assessed with respect to FCgRIIIa genotypes. Results: DNA was isolated from all 55 patients and successfully analyzed by SSCP for polymorphisms at position 158 of FCgRIIIa. Nine of 55 patients were V/V (16%), 27 were F/F (49%) and 19 were heterozygous V/F (35%). Overall, the 3 month response rate CR+PR) was 31/55 (56%) and the best overall response rate was 39/55 (71%). The 3 month response (post rituximab) was 5/9 (56%) for V/V, 9/19 (47%) for V/F and 17/27 (63%) for F/F patients. Best response was 6/9 (67%) for V/V, 12/19 (63%) for V/F and 21/27 (78%) for F/F patients. Median TTP was 19.5 months for V/V, 22.3 months for V/F and 18 months for F/F patients. The PFS at 1 year post initiation of rituximab was 57% for V/V, 61% for VF and 68% for FF patients while at the median follow-up of 3.5 years the PFS was 31% for V/V, 42% for V/F and 31% for F/F patients. Conclusions: FCgRIIIa polymorphisms were not associated with response rate or time to progression following a treatment program consisting of single agent rituximab followed by idiotype vaccination with mitumprotimut-T in rituximab-naïve patients. Results from an ongoing randomized Phase III study will assess the efficacy of this combined therapy, but these data suggest that long term PFS in patients receiving an idiotype vaccine following rituximab may rely more on a cell mediated immune response rather than a humoral response to idiotype.

scholarly journals Agnostic Evaluation of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Association: A Metanalysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Marchetti ◽  
Andrea Botticelli ◽  
Antonio Paolo Ascierto ◽  
Giuseppe Curigliano ◽  
Diana Giannarelli
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Combination Strategy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Single Agent Therapy ◽  
Tumor Types

Abstract Background. Ipilimumab and Nivolumab, targeting the molecules CTLA-4, PD-1, respectively, have shown efficacy against several types of cancer. Despite these results, only a small percentage of patients maintain a long-lasting effect. Even Ipilimumab, in combination with nivolumab, has demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in multiple tumor types. However, no trial has been designed with the primary endpoint to compare the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined, compared to nivolumab alone. Hence, the added value of ipilimumab in the combination has not clearly been established yet. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of the combination strategy compared to single agent therapy.Materials and methods. We performed a meta-analysis of Phase I-II-III Clinical Trials, published from 2010 up to 2020, in which the combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab was compared to nivolumab alone. We extracted ORR, OS and PFS HR on the basis of treatment from the subgroup analysis of each trial. Results. A total of 8 trials were included in the present meta-analysis. Overall, 1313 patients were treated with the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination compared to 1110 patients treated with nivolumab alone. All trials reported the Objective response rate (ORR) (Table 2), no heterogeneity was found and the pooled Odds Ratio (Figure 1) was highly in favor of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination with respect to nivolumab alone (1.683; 95% CI: 1.407-2.012; P<0.0001). Three studies were considered for Progression free survival (PFS) analysis (Table 3), no heterogeneity was found and the pooled Hazard Ratio (Figure 2) favored the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with respect to nivolumab alone (0.807; 95% CI: 0.719-0.907; P<0.0001). The Overall survival (OS) endpoint was considered only in 2 trials (Table 4), no heterogeneity was found and the pooled HR (Figure 3) favored, also in this case, the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with respect to nivolumab alone (0.87; 95% CI: 0.763-0.997; P=0.045).Conclusions. The combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab seems to be superior to nivolumab alone in cancer patients, regardless of histology.

A phase II evaluation of bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5531-5531 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
M. W. Sill ◽  
K. Darcy ◽  
B. Greer ◽  
D. S. McMeekin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Grade 3

5531 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor, has demonstrated clinical benefit in multiple tumor types. This is the first report of the activity of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EMC). Methods: Eligible patients had persistent or recurrent EMC after receiving 1–2 prior cytotoxic regimens, measurable disease, and GOG performance status < 2. Treatment consisted of BV 15 mg/kg IV q 3 weeks until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, objective response rate, and toxicity by NCI CTCAE v3.0. The clinical trial was carried out in a flexible 2-stage group sequential design intended to detect either cytostatic or cytotoxic activity. Sample sizes were targeted to limit the probability of designating ineffective regimens as being active 10% with at least 90% statistical power. Clinically significant improvements were 20% increases in the proportion responding or surviving progression-free at 6 months over historical controls. Results: From March 2006 to January 2008, 56 patients were enrolled. Two were excluded due to a second primary and one due to inadequate pathology; thus, the sample included 53 patients. Median age was 62 (range 44–84) years, and prior treatment consisted of 1 or 2 regimens in 33 and 20 patients, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (52.8%) had prior radiation. Early results showed 8/53 (15.1%) response rate, with 1 complete response and 7 partial responses; and 19/53 (35.8%) of patients progression free at 6 months with 2 patients pending at the time of data analysis. Median PFS was 4.2 months. Median Overall survival (OS) was 10.5 months. The following grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed: anemia (1 grade 3), cardiovascular (4 grade 3), constitutional (2 grade 3), hemorrhage (1 grade 3), hepatic (1 grade 3), musculoskeletal (2 grade 3), metabolic (1 grade 3, 1 grade 4), neurologic (1 grade 3), pain (4 grade 3), and vascular (1 grade 3, 1 grade 4). Conclusions: BV appears to have single agent activity in women with recurrent or persistent EMC and warrants further investigation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document