Breast cancer experience in Uruguay: A 21-year follow up of 1,906 patients in the same institution
21163 Background: Breast cancer is the most common tumor arising in Uruguaian women accounting for 1,930 patients/year (adjusted incidence ratio 83.1/100,000) with 637 death/year (adjusted mortality ratio 24.1/100,000). Both incidence and mortality rank Uruguay at the top of the latinamerican countries ( IARC-GloboCan 2002). We are presenting our final results with 1,906 patients followed during a 21 year period in the biggest private Institution in our country (CENDIMA) and probably amongst all other latin-american countries. Methods: Although this study was initially designed to find a relationship between prognostic factors and survival parameters: OS (overall survival) and DFS (disease free survival) it also describes the epidemiological features of a big breast cancer population in the top ranked country for breast cancer incidence and mortality in Latin America. Statistical analysis was calculated with SPSS (11.0 version) and SAS (6.0 version) programs. OS and DFS results were obtained through Kaplan Meier method. Log rank test was implemented for univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazard rates were used for multivariate analysis. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 61.0 (SD 13.5). Ductal infiltrating carcinoma (DIC) accounted for more than 80% of patients and 56% were node negative (N0) patients at diagnosis. Stratification was: Stage 0: 8.6%, Stage I: 31.5%, Stage II: 41.8%, Stage III: 16.6%, Stage IV: 1.5%. For OS, the axillary status and hystologic grade showed the highest relative ratio (RR) value: 2.49 and 2.40. The nodal status was the main prognostic factor related to DFS with a 2.2 RR. The five and ten year survival rate was: 0.96 and 0.92 (stage I), 0.84 and 0.71 (stage II), 0.71 and 0.56 (stage III) and 0.39 and 0.29 (stage IV) respectively. Conclusions: This is the final analysis of our population in Uruguay representing the biggest report in breast pathology in a latin-american country with a long follow up period (more than 20 years). Our “good” survival results may reflect the initially low risk population at diagnosis (56% node negative, 40.1% stage 0-I ). Nodal status, histologic grade and staging at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate analysis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.