Association of a germ-line variant in the K-ras 3’ untranslated region with response and progression-free survival in patients with mCRC treated with single-agent cetuximab (IMCL-0144) or in combination with cetuximab (EPIC) independent of K-ras mutation status

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4061-4061 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Winder ◽  
W. Zhang ◽  
A. El-Khoueiry ◽  
D. Yang ◽  
A. Pohl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Ras Mutation ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Type K

4061 Background: Recent studies have found K-ras mutation status predicts response to EGFR inhibitors in mCRC. An in vitro study demonstrated let-7 microRNA family can regulate RAS expression by binding to the 3’UTR of RAS gene. Chin et al found a SNP in a let-7 microRNA complementary site (LCS) in the K-ras 3’ UTR increases cancer risk in NSCLC. We tested the hypothesis whether this SNP may be associated with clinical outcome in 130 mCRC patients enrolled in IMCL-0144 trial and in 186 pts enrolled in EPIC trial independent of K-Ras mutation status in the tumor. Methods: K-ras lcs 6 SNP was tested in 130 mCRC patients enrolled in IMC-0144 phase II clinical trial (single agent cetuximab) and in 186 mCRC patients enrolled in a second line phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan versus irinotecan alone (EPIC). Genomic DNA was extracted from dissected formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue and K-ras mutation status and the polymorphism were analyzed using direct sequencing and PCR-RFLP technique. Results: The G harboring allele frequency in K-ras lcs6 was 8% in IMC-0144 and 11% in EPIC. K-ras lcs6 polymorphism was significantly associated with tumor response in patients with wild type K-ras in IMC-0144. The 12 pts harboring a G allele (TG+GG) had a 42% partial response (PR) rate compared to 55 pts with TT genotype with only 9% PR.(p=0.02, Fisher's-exact test). However, pts with TT genotype enrolled in EPIC treated with CPT-11 and cetuximab with mutant K-ras had a significantly better PFS of 12 weeks (95% CI 6.4–18) compared to those harboring the a G allele with median PFS of 6.4 weeks (95% 5.7–7) (p=0.037. log-rank test). There was no association between this polymorphism and clinical outcome in patients with wild type K-ras enrolled in EPIC. In a multivariate analysis the polymorphism remained independently associated with PFS in EPIC. Conclusions: Our data suggest for the first time that the functional germline polymorphism in K-ras lcs6 may be a potential predictive marker in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab-based chemotherapy independent of K-ras mutation status. This finding warranted further confirmative clinical trials. [Table: see text]

Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/− cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4022-4022
Author(s):  
D. Yang ◽  
A. Pohl ◽  
W. Zhang ◽  
G. Lurje ◽  
Y. Ning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Ca Repeat ◽  
Ras Mutation ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Log Rank Test

4022 Background: EPIC, a multinational phase III clinical trial with IR + CB vs IR alone in mCRC pts in the second-line setting after failure of FOLFOX demonstrated a benefit for IR+CB in progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). We evaluated functional germline polymorphisms involved in the EGFR- (EGF, EGFR), angiogenesis- (VEGF, IL-8, CXCR-2) - and drug- metabolism related genes (UGT1A1, MTHFR) for their potential role as molecular predictors for clinical outcome in pts treated with CB/IR vs. IR alone. Methods: DNA was extracted from all available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from the phase III EPIC trial (US sites only). Genotyping was performed using PCR-RFLP assays and 5’ -end [g-33P] ATP’ labeled PCR-protocols. Results: 186 pts were treated either with IR/CB (arm A, 84 pts) or IR (arm B, 102 pts) only. In arm A, 11/84 pts (13%) showed CR or PR, whereas 73/84 (87%) pts had SD or PD. For arm B, 6/102 pts (6%) showed CR or PR, whereas 96/102 pts (94%) had SD or PD. Median PFS in arm A was 3.0 months (95%CI: 2.4- 4.1 months) vs 2.7 months (95%CI: 2.2–2.9 months) in arm B; median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95%CI: 7.1–12.1 months) in arm A vs. 12.3 months (95%CI: 10.4- 17.9 months) in arm B. K-ras mutation status was not significantly associated with PFS or response to CB/IR in the subgroup of 186 patients. We found an EGFR-CA- repeat in intron 1 in arm A to be associated with PFS (p=0.031, log-rank test). In arm B, we found a significant association with RR (p=0.0103, Fisher's exact test) for MTHFR1298. Furthermore, MTHFR 677 (p =0.0048, log-rank test) and MTHFR 1298 (p=0.038, log-rank test) were also found to be associated with OS in arm B. In multivariate analysis, EGFR-CA-repeat was significantly associated with PFS (adjusted p= 0.023). Furthermore, MTHFR 677 and MTHFR 1298 was associated with OS (adjusted p=0.028 and 0.026, respectively, Cox-proportional hazards models), independent from K-ras mutation status, race and number of disease sites. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the potential predictive value of polymorphisms in the EGFR- and MTHFR- gene in mCRC pts treated with IR+ CB. Further validation in additional clinical trials is necessary. [Table: see text]

Genetic variations in semaphorin/neuropilin signaling to predict clinical outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving bevacizumab-based chemotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11608-11608
Author(s):  
Yuji Miyamoto ◽  
Fotios Loupakis ◽  
Wu Zhang ◽  
Shu Cao ◽  
Satoshi Okazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Ras Mutation ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Gtpase Activating Proteins

11608 Background: Neuropilin ( NRP) is known to be an important VEGF co-receptor that acts as a key mediator of angiogenesis. Its ligands, semaphorins ( SEMA), compete with VEGF for NRP binding and can themselves have angiogenic activity. Plexins are also receptors of SEMAs, and have the GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) domain for RAS. NRPs are shown to signal through RAS pathways. We aimed to evaluate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes involved in the SEMA/NRPpathways predict clinical outcome in bevacizumab-treated mCRC pts. Methods: Associations between nine SNPs in 7 genes ( SEMA3A, SEMA3D, SEMA3F, NRP1, NRP2, PLXNA1 and PLXND1) and clinical outcomes were evaluated in mCRC patients receiving first-line FOLFIRI-bevacizumab in a phase III trial: TRIBE ( N= 228). Associations between genotype and RAS mutation status with clinical outcomes was also examined. Main characteristics were the following: male/female = 138/90; median age = 60; RAS-wildtype/mutant = 55/116; median PFS = 9.7 months; median OS = 26.1 months, median follow-up time = 49.3 months. Results: NRP1 rs2228638 Any A ( N= 40) showed a significantly longer PFS compared to G/G variant ( N= 188) in the univariate (11.6 months (M) vs. 9.5 M, HR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.43-0.95, p = 0.022) and the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.38-0.90, p = 0.016). SEMA3F rs12632110 A/A ( N= 20) showed a significantly shorter PFS compared to any G variant (N = 205) in the multivariate analysis (HR = 1.89, 95%CI = 1.02-3.49, p = 0.043). Among RAS-mutant pts, SEMA3F rs12632110, SEMA3F rs1046956, SEMA3D rs7800072, NRP1 rs228638, PLXNA1 rs4679323 and PLXND1 rs2255703 polymorphisms were significantly associated with PFS in the univariate and multivariate analysis. PLXNA1 rs4679323 was also significantly associated with OS in the univariate and multivariate analysis. There was no association between these polymorphisms and outcome in patients with RASwildtype tumors. Conclusions: Genetic variants within SEMA/NRP pathways may be prognostic markers in RAS mutant mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy.

Different clinical outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients treated with intensive triplet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (FIr-B/FOx) according to KRAS genotype and disease extension.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14010-e14010
Author(s):  
Gemma Bruera ◽  
Katia Cannita ◽  
Daniela Di Giacomo ◽  
Aude Lamy ◽  
Giancarlo Troncone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Triplet Chemotherapy

e14010 Background: Bevacizumab (BEV) plus triplet chemotherapy can increase efficacy of first-line treatment of MCRC, particularly if integrated with secondary liver surgery in liver-limited (L-L) patients (pts). Clinical outcome of FIr-B/FOx regimen was evaluated according to KRAS genotype in L-L and other MCRC pts. Methods: Tumoral and metastatic samples were screened for KRAS codon 12 and 13, and BRAF mutations by SNaPshot and/or direct sequencing. MCRC pts were classified as L-L and other or multiple metastatic (O/MM). Activity and efficacy were evaluated and compared using log-rank test. Results: Fifty-nine pts were evaluated: 31 KRAS wild-type, 53%; 28 KRAS mutant, 47%. At 21.5 months median follow-up, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were, respectively: KRAS wild-type 90%, 14 months, 38 months; KRAS mutant 67%, 11 months, 20 months. PFS and OS were, respectively: overall in 25 L-L compared to 32 O/MM evaluable pts, 17 and 12 months, 47 and 21 months, significantly different; in KRAS wild-type, 12 L-L compared to 18 O/MM, 21 and 12 months, 47 and 28 months, significantly different; in KRAS mutant, 13 L-L compared to 14 O/MMS, 11 months equivalently, 39 and 19 months, not significantly different. Conclusions: First line FIr-B/FOx regimen can increase activity and efficacy of KRAS wild-type and mutant MCRC pts; integration with secondary liver surgery significantly discriminates increased clinical outcome in KRAS wild-type L-L compared to O/MM pts while not in KRAS mutant pts.

scholarly journals Comprehensive Genomic Analysis in NRG Oncology/RTOG 9802: A Phase III Trial of Radiation Versus Radiation Plus Procarbazine, Lomustine (CCNU), and Vincristine in High-Risk Low-Grade Glioma

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29) ◽  
pp. 3407-3417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica H. Bell ◽  
Peixin Zhang ◽  
Edward G. Shaw ◽  
Jan C. Buckner ◽  
Geoffrey R. Barger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Low Grade Glioma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
450K Array ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Hoc

PURPOSE NRG Oncology/RTOG 9802 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003375 ) is a practice-changing study for patients with WHO low-grade glioma (LGG, grade II), as it was the first to demonstrate a survival benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy. This post hoc study sought to determine the prognostic and predictive impact of the WHO-defined molecular subgroups and corresponding molecular alterations within NRG Oncology/RTOG 9802. METHODS IDH1/2 mutations were determined by immunohistochemistry and/or deep sequencing. A custom Ion AmpliSeq panel was used for mutation analysis. 1p/19q codeletion and MGMT promoter methylation were determined by copy-number arrays and/or Illumina 450K array, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model and tested using the log-rank test. Multivariable analyses (MVAs) were performed incorporating treatment and common prognostic factors as covariates. RESULTS Of the eligible patients successfully profiled for the WHO-defined molecular groups (n = 106/251), 26 (24%) were IDH-wild type, 43 (41%) were IDH-mutant/non-codeleted, and 37(35%) were IDH-mutant/codeleted. MVAs demonstrated that WHO subgroup was a significant predictor of PFS after adjustment for clinical variables and treatment. Notably, treatment with postradiation chemotherapy (PCV; procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine) was associated with longer PFS (HR, 0.32; P = .003; HR, 0.13; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.38; P = .013; HR, 0.21; P = .029) in the IDH-mutant/non-codeleted and IDH-mutant/codeleted subgroups, respectively. In contrast, no significant difference in either PFS or OS was observed with the addition of PCV in the IDH-wild-type subgroup. CONCLUSION This study is the first to report the predictive value of the WHO-defined diagnostic classification in a set of uniformly treated patients with LGG in a clinical trial. Importantly, this post hoc analysis supports the notion that patients with IDH-mutant high-risk LGG regardless of codeletion status receive benefit from the addition of PCV.

Gemcitabine plus docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients (pts) with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A randomized phase III study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1015-1015
Author(s):  
D. L. Nielsen ◽  
S. T. Langkjer ◽  
K. Bjerre ◽  
S. Cold ◽  
L. Stenbygaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Grade 3

1015 Background: Gemcitabine (G), either as a single agent or in combination with taxanes, has demonstrated efficacy in MBC in phase II and III studies. We conducted a phase III study to compare time to progression (TTP) of G plus docetaxel (T) versus (vs.) T alone. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Methods: Females with HER-2-negative locally advanced or MBC and a WHO performance status ≤ 2 were randomized to GT (G 1,000mg/m2 day 1 + 8; T 75mg/m2 day 1) or T (100mg/m2 day 1) every 21 days. Pts were previously untreated, had prior anthracycline-based (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or had received a single prior anthracycline-bsed chemotherapy regimen for MBC. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was applied for comparisons between regimens. The planned sample size was 254 evaluable pts with α I and β of 0.05 and 0.90, respectively. Results: A total of 336 pts were randomized (170 GT; 166 T), data from one centre are yet missing and the present evaluation is based on data from 306 pts (155 GT; 151 T). The pts had a median age of 58 years in both regimens; range 36–73 years and 30–74 years, respectively. The median TTP was 7.5 months for the GT regimen vs. 6.5 months for the T regimen. The GT arm demonstrated an ORR of 44% vs. 38% in the T arm with 4 and 3 % complete responses, respectively. The OS was 13.4 vs. 13.2 months in the GT and T arm, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was common, especially grade 3–4 neutropenia (GT = 69%; T = 61%); infection was reported in 22 and 20% of the pts, respectively (none of the pts received G-CSF). The most commonly reported non-hematologic toxicities of grade 3–4 included mucositis (GT = 2%; T = 5%), diarrhea (GT = 4%; T = 7 %), fatigue (GT = 6%; T = 11%), oedema (GT = 10%; T = 3%), and peripheral neuropathy (GT = 9%; T = 28%). Conclusions: Preliminary data of GT as first- or second-line chemotherapy demonstrates a TTP advantage among HER-2-negative pts with advanced breast cancer. Updated results and proper statistical analyses will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Pharmacogenomic analysis of the triplet combination of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab as salvage therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14531-e14531
Author(s):  
A. Hernandez ◽  
E. Bandres ◽  
J. Rodriguez ◽  
N. Bitarte ◽  
N. Ramirez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Combination Methods

e14531 Background: We have previously reported that biweekly gemcitabine-based therapy was active in pretreated mCRC pts (De la Cruz et al, ASCO GI 2008, abstr 377). We aimed to investigate whether germ line polymorphisms may be predictors of clinical outcome in mCRC pts treated with this combination. Methods: We evaluated SNPs of genes involved in gemcitabine metabolism (CDA, dCDK, RRM1, DCTD, SLC28A1), DNA repair (XRCC1, XRCC 3, ERCC1, XPD) and two IgG Fcγ R polymorphisms (Fcγ RIIa- H131R and Fcγ RIIIa-V158F), reported to be predictive of cetuximab-based therapy, even in K-ras mutated pts. Whole blood was collected and DNA extracted from peripheral lymphocytes using a DNA isolation Kit (Qiagen, CA). Polymorphisms were detected using the TaqMan genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems, CA). Clinical response was evaluated according to RECIST criteria. Univariate analysis (Fisher´s exact test for response; log-rank test for TTP and OS) was performed to examine associations between polymorphisms and clinical outcome. Results: Blood samples of 35 out of 39 enrolled pts were tested for genomic analysis. Patient‘s characteristics are as follows; M/F: 26/13, median age: 59 years, median number of prior chemotherapy lines: 2 (1–4), Köhne risk groups; low: 8 pts, intermediate: 18 pts, high: 13 pts. After a median follow-up of 20 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) is 6.7 months (95% CI; 5.2–8.3) and median overall survival 15.4 m (95% CI; 14.7–16.1). Overall response rate (ORR) was 53.8%. RRM1 R284R SNPs (p=0.06), T741T (p=0.02) and RRM1–524CT (p=0.04) were linked to clinical responsiveness. All pts possessing 2 or 3 favourable RRM1 SNPs responded. ORR was 53.3% for pts with no favourable SNPs versus 85% for pts with any favourable SNP (p=0.04). ORR was also significantly higher in pts with any histidine allele in the Fcγ RIIa polymorphism (93% vs. 60%, p=0.034). Median PFS was adversely affected in pts harbouring no favourable RRM1 SNPs (4.2m versus 6.7 months, p=0.019) and in those pts with homozygous Fcγ RIIa-131R allele (4.4 vs. 7.5 months, p=0.007). Conclusions: Polymorphic variants of RRM1 and Fcγ RIIa may play a key role in the efficacy of gemcitabine and cetuximab-based therapy for mCRC pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Hand–foot syndrome (HFS) as a potential biomarker of efficacy in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sunitinib (SU).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 320-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Michaelson ◽  
D. P. Cohen ◽  
S. Li ◽  
R. J. Motzer ◽  
B. Escudier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Potential Biomarker

320 Background: HFS and related skin toxicities are common side effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as SU, a multitargeted inhibitor of VEGF and PDGF receptors plus other receptor tyrosine kinases. In a randomized phase III trial of treatment-naïve mRCC pts, SU showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) over interferon-alfa, with a median PFS of 11 mo and median overall survival (OS) of 26.4 mo, establishing SU as a reference standard of care (Motzer et al, 2009). In this retrospective analysis, correlations between SU-associated HFS and efficacy endpoints were investigated in mRCC pts from 5 clinical trials in the first- and second-line treatment settings. Methods: Analyses included pooled data from 770 pts who received single-agent SU as 50 mg/d on a 4-week-on/2-week-off schedule (n=544; 71%) or 37.5 mg continuous once-daily dosing (n=226; 29%). Median PFS and OS were estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods and compared between pts with vs without HFS using a log-rank test. ORR was compared by Pearson's chi-square test. Tumor response was assessed by investigators and adverse events were recorded regularly. Multivariate and time-dependent covariate analyses were performed. Results: Of 770 pts, 179 (23%) developed any-grade HFS, compared with 591 (77%) who did not. Most instances of HFS (63%) initially occurred during the first 3 treatment cycles. Pts who developed HFS had significantly better ORR (55.6% vs. 32.7%), PFS (14.3 vs. 8.3 mo), and OS (38.3 vs. 18.9 mo) than pts who did not develop HFS (p<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, SU-associated HFS remained a significant independent predictor of both PFS and OS (and of OS by time-dependent covariate analysis). Conclusions: In mRCC pts, SU-associated HFS was significantly and independently associated with improved clinical outcomes. Overall, pts who did not develop HFS still had substantial benefit from SU. However, the presence of HFS identified a subset of pts that manifested highly favorable efficacy results with SU. These findings suggest that development of HFS may serve as a predictive biomarker of SU efficacy, although prospective validation is warranted. [Table: see text]

International tailored chemotherapy adjuvant trial: Itaca trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7109-TPS7109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Novello ◽  
Christian Manegold ◽  
Christian Grohe ◽  
Ida Colantonio ◽  
Monika Heidi Serke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Excision Repair ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Experimental Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Genetic Profile ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Versus Protein

TPS7109 Background: This is an ongoing phase III multicenter randomized trial comparing adjuvant pharmacogenomic-driven chemotherapy, based on thymidilate synthase (TS) and excision-repair cross-complementing -1 (ERCC1) gene expression versus standard adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (EudraCT #: 2008-001764-36). Methods: In all registered patients, before randomization, expression of ERCC1 and TS is assessed by qRT-PCR on paraffin-embedded tumor specimens in a central laboratory. Randomization is stratified by stage and smoking status. Trial was emended on Feb, 2011 with the 7th staging system. Primary end point is overall survival; secondary end points include recurrence-free survival, therapeutic compliance, toxicity profile and comparative evaluation of ERCC1 and TS mRNA versus protein. It is assumed that the 5-year survival in the control arm is 45% and the hazard reduction associated to the experimental treatment is 30%. With a power of 90% to detect the estimated effect with log-rank test, a significant level of 5% (2 tails), 336 events have to be observed; the expected total number of patients is 700. The final statistical analysis will group together all control arms and all tailored chemotherapies groups. Efficacy analysis will be done on an intent-to-treat basis. Cox proportional hazard model will be used for estimating hazard ratios after adjusting for relevant variables. Within 45 days post-surgery, patients in each genetic profile are randomized to receive either a standard chemotherapy selected by the investigator (cisplatin/vinorelbine, cisplatin/docetaxel or cisplatin/gemcitabine) or an experimental treatment (tailored arms) selected as follows: 1) high ERCC1 and high TS 4 cycles of single agent paclitaxel 2) high ERCC1 and low TS 4 cycles of single agent pemetrexed 3) low ERCC1 and high TS 4 cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine 4) low ERCC1 and low TS) 4 cycles of cisplatin/pemetrexed. All chemotherapy regimens are administered for a total of 4 cycles on a 3-weekly basis. Currently, 312 patients have been randomized from 26 institutions mainly located in Italy and Germany (average enrolment: 13 patients/month).

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Docetaxel and Sodium Cantharidinate Combination vs. Either Agent Alone as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC With Wild-Type or Unknown EGFR Status: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled, Prospective, Multi-Center Phase III Trial (Cando-L1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Wu ◽  
Chao Deng ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Jie Weng ◽  
Youhua Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Second-line treatment options for advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/sodium cantharidinate combination vs. either agent alone as second-line treatment for advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients with wild-type or unknown EGFR status. A randomized, open-label, phase III study was performed at 12 institutions. Patients with failure of first-line platinum regimens were randomized to receive either single-agent sodium cantharivsdinate (SCA) or single-agent docetaxel (DOX) or docetaxel/sodium cantharidinate combination (CON). The primary endpoints were centrally confirmed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL) and toxicity. A total of 148 patients were enrolled in our study between October 2016 and March 2020. After a median follow-up time of 8.02 months, no significant difference was observed among the three groups in ORR (SCA vs. DOX vs. CON: 6.00% vs. 8.33% vs. 10.00%, respectively; p=0.814) and DCR (74.00% vs. 52.00% vs. 62.50%, respectively; p=0.080). In additional, the mOS was significantly higher in the CON group, compared with the single-agent groups (7.27 vs. 5.03 vs. 9.83 months, respectively; p=0.035), while no significant differences were observed in terms of PFS (2.7 vs. 2.9 vs. 3.1 months, respectively; p=0.740). There was no significant difference in the baseline QoL scores between the three groups (p&gt;0.05); after treatment, life quality in SCA and CON group was significantly better than that in the DOX group (p&lt;0.05). Furthermore, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in the SCA group was significantly lower (46.00 vs. 79.17 vs. 25.00%, respectively; p=0.038) and the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was also significantly lower in the SCA group compared with the DOX and CON groups (10.00 vs. 82.00 vs. 30.00%, respectively; p=0.042). Single-agent SCA and single-agent DOX has similar therapeutic efficacy in the second-line treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC with wild-type or unknown EGFR status, but single-agent SCA has fewer AEs and better QoL. Also, SCA plus DOX can significantly improve OS and exerted a significant synergistic effect, with good safety and tolerance profile.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document