Hand–foot syndrome (HFS) as a potential biomarker of efficacy in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sunitinib (SU).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 320-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Michaelson ◽  
D. P. Cohen ◽  
S. Li ◽  
R. J. Motzer ◽  
B. Escudier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Potential Biomarker

320 Background: HFS and related skin toxicities are common side effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as SU, a multitargeted inhibitor of VEGF and PDGF receptors plus other receptor tyrosine kinases. In a randomized phase III trial of treatment-naïve mRCC pts, SU showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) over interferon-alfa, with a median PFS of 11 mo and median overall survival (OS) of 26.4 mo, establishing SU as a reference standard of care (Motzer et al, 2009). In this retrospective analysis, correlations between SU-associated HFS and efficacy endpoints were investigated in mRCC pts from 5 clinical trials in the first- and second-line treatment settings. Methods: Analyses included pooled data from 770 pts who received single-agent SU as 50 mg/d on a 4-week-on/2-week-off schedule (n=544; 71%) or 37.5 mg continuous once-daily dosing (n=226; 29%). Median PFS and OS were estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods and compared between pts with vs without HFS using a log-rank test. ORR was compared by Pearson's chi-square test. Tumor response was assessed by investigators and adverse events were recorded regularly. Multivariate and time-dependent covariate analyses were performed. Results: Of 770 pts, 179 (23%) developed any-grade HFS, compared with 591 (77%) who did not. Most instances of HFS (63%) initially occurred during the first 3 treatment cycles. Pts who developed HFS had significantly better ORR (55.6% vs. 32.7%), PFS (14.3 vs. 8.3 mo), and OS (38.3 vs. 18.9 mo) than pts who did not develop HFS (p<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, SU-associated HFS remained a significant independent predictor of both PFS and OS (and of OS by time-dependent covariate analysis). Conclusions: In mRCC pts, SU-associated HFS was significantly and independently associated with improved clinical outcomes. Overall, pts who did not develop HFS still had substantial benefit from SU. However, the presence of HFS identified a subset of pts that manifested highly favorable efficacy results with SU. These findings suggest that development of HFS may serve as a predictive biomarker of SU efficacy, although prospective validation is warranted. [Table: see text]

An international, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study (MONET1) of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA7512-LBA7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Scagliotti ◽  
I. Vynnychenko ◽  
Y. Ichinose ◽  
K. Park ◽  
K. Kubota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Model ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nonsquamous Nsclc

LBA7512 Background: This study evaluated whether motesanib (a selective oral inhibitor of VEGFR 1, 2 and 3; PDGFR and Kit) plus C/P improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo + C/P in patients (pts) with nonsquamous NSCLC and in a subset of pts with adenocarcinoma. Methods: Pts had stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC and no prior systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC. The study initially enrolled all histologies but was amended to exclude pts with squamous NSCLC owing to a high rate of hemoptysis. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive up to six 3-wk cycles of C (AUC 6 mg/mL·min) and P (200 mg/m2) with either motesanib 125 mg QD (Arm A) or placebo QD (Arm B) orally continuously. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR) and association between placental growth factor (PLGF) change and OS. OS was evaluated using a stratified Cox model and 2-sided log-rank test (α=0.03 for nonsquamous pts and α=0.02 for adenocarcinoma pts). Results: 1090 pts with nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized (Arm A/B, n=541/549); 890 had adenocarcinoma (n=448/442). 61% were men; median age was 60 years (range 21–87); 83% had stage IV disease. At the time of analysis, 753 pts had died (608 pts with adenocarcinoma). Median follow-up was 10.6 mo. OS was not significantly improved in Arm A compared with Arm B (Table). In Arm A, PLGF analysis did not show an association with OS. The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs in Arms A/B was 73/59%. Grade ≥3 AEs occurring more frequently in Arm A than B included neutropenia (22/15%), diarrhea (9/1%), hypertension (7/1%) and cholecystitis (3/0%). The incidence of grade 5 AEs was 14/9% in Arms A/B. Conclusions: In pts with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, treatment with motesanib + C/P did not significantly improve OS compared with C/P alone. [Table: see text]

OlympiAD: Phase III trial of olaparib monotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients (pts) with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4-LBA4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Robson ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Elżbieta Senkus ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Susan M. Domchek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Eortc Qlq

LBA4 Background: Olaparib is an oral PARP inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in HER2-negative mBC with a g BRCAm (NCT00494234). OlympiAD (NCT02000622) was a randomized, open-label, phase III study that assessed efficacy and safety of olaparib vs standard single agent chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in pts with HER2-negative mBC and a g BRCAm. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 y with HER2-negative mBC (hormone receptor positive or triple negative [TN]) and a g BRCAm, who had received ≤2 chemotherapy lines for mBC, were randomized (2:1) to olaparib tablets (300 mg po bid) or TPC (21-day cycles of either capecitabine [2500 mg/m2 po days 1–14], vinorelbine [30 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8] or eribulin [1.4 mg/m2IV days 1 and 8]). Treatment was continued until objective disease progression (RECIST v1.1) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Results: 302 pts were randomized (median age 44 y; 50% TN; 71% prior chemotherapy for mBC; 28% prior platinum) of whom 205 received olaparib and 91 received TPC (6 TPC pts were not treated). At 77% data maturity, PFS by BICR was significantly longer in pts treated with olaparib vs TPC (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43, 0.80; P=0.0009; 7.0 vs 4.2 months, respectively). Time to second progression (investigator-assessed) was also longer in the olaparib arm (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.40, 0.83). Objective response rate was 59.9 and 28.8% in olaparib and TPC arms, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) occurred in 36.6 and 50.5% of olaparib and TPC pts, with AEs leading to discontinuation in 4.9 and 7.7% of pts, respectively. Mean change from baseline in global health-related quality of life (HRQoL, EORTC-QLQ-C30) across all timepoints favored olaparib (difference vs TPC 7.5; 95% CI 2.48, 12.44; P=0.0035). Conclusions: Olaparib tablet monotherapy provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit to HER2-negative mBC pts with a g BRCAm, compared to standard TPC. The safety profile of olaparib was consistent with prior studies. The efficacy benefit was seen beyond the first progression and HRQoL also improved. Clinical trial information: NCT02000622.

Management of Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Review of the Literature

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (20) ◽  
pp. 2966-2974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry J. Long
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Multiple Drug ◽  
Cervix Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials

This article reviews the English-language literature concerning chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervix carcinoma. Specifically, it reviews the available literature for active single agents, doublets, triplets, and multiple drug combination chemotherapy. Until recently, single-agent cisplatin was the drug of choice in metastatic cervix cancer. Various doublets, triplets, and quartlets have been reported to have higher objective response rates than single-agent cisplatin when compared in phase III clinical trials. Some have demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival, but only topotecan plus cisplatin has demonstrated an improvement in overall survival. This benefit is most apparent in patients who have a long disease-free interval from primary therapy and who have not received prior cisplatin as a radiosensitizer.

OCEANS: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian (EOC), primary peritoneal (PPC), or fallopian tube cancer (FTC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5007-LBA5007 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
N. J. Finkler ◽  
T. Rutherford ◽  
D. A. Smith ◽  
J. Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Platinum Sensitive

LBA5007 Background: BEV, a humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, has shown a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in 2 frontline phase III trials in patients with EOC, PPC and FTC. The therapeutic impact of BEV in combination with carboplatin (C) and gemcitabine (G) followed by single agent BEV to disease progression (PD) was evaluated in this phase III trial in the platinum-sensitive recurrent setting. Methods: Patients had recurrent, platinum-sensitive EOC, PPC or FTC, 1 prior regimen, no prior BEV, ECOG performance status 0-1, measurable disease. Subjects were randomized to: Arm A: [IV C (AUC 4, Day (D) 1) + G (1,000 mg/m2 D1 and 8) + placebo (PL) D1] q21D x 6 cycles (c) → PL q21D until PD or unacceptable toxicity (tox) Arm B: [CG + BEV (15 mg/kg) D1] q21D x 6 c → BEV q21D until PD or tox primary endpoint was investigator assessed PFS (RECIST). Secondary endpoints included objective response (OR), overall survival (OS), duration of response and safety. The design provided 80% power to detect a 27% reduction in the hazard of progression or death in Arm B vs A, limiting the overall type I error of 5%. Results: OCEANS enrolled 484 patients (242 per arm) from 4/07 - 1/10, median follow up of 24 months. BEV plus CG followed by single agent BEV to PD significantly increased PFS compared to CG alone (HR=0.484, p<0.0001). OR increased by 21% (p<0.0001). OS data is immature with only 29% of patients having had an event. The safety profile was consistent with other BEV trials. Conclusions: Results show a statistically significant and clinically relevant benefit when bevacizumab is added to chemotherapy in patients with recurrent, platinum sensitive EOC, PPC, and FTC. This is the first phase III trial of an antiangiogenic to demonstrate a clinical benefit to these patients. [Table: see text]

Hypertension (HTN) as a potential biomarker of efficacy in patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treated with sunitinib (SU).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 38-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. George ◽  
T. Lechner ◽  
S. Li ◽  
D. P. Cohen ◽  
G. D. Demetri
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Hazards Model ◽  
Potential Biomarker

38 Background: HTN is a class effect of VEGF signaling pathway inhibitors. SU is a multitargeted inhibitor of VEGFRs and other receptor tyrosine kinases. Associations between SU-induced HTN and efficacy endpoints (OS, PFS, TTP, and ORR) in pts with imatinib-resistant/intolerant GIST from 2 prospective clinical trials were investigated retrospectively. Methods: This analysis included pooled data from 319 pts who received SU and had post-baseline blood pressure (BP) data available. Tumor response data were based on investigator assessments. Most pts (87%) received SU 50 mg/d on the standard 4-wk-on/2-wk-off schedule. BP was measured on the first and last day of dosing in each treatment cycle at a minimum. HTN was defined as max or mean SBP ≥ 140 or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg. OS, PFS, and TTP were estimated by Kaplan—Meier methods and compared between pts with vs. without HTN using the log-rank test. The influence of prognostic risk factors was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: 233 and 187 pts (73% and 59%) had ≥ 1 HTN episode as defined by max SBP and DBP, respectively. Efficacy results significantly favored pts who developed HTN on SU based on max SBP or DBP (eg, median OS for pts with HTN [max SBP] was 89.4 weeks vs. 53.1 weeks for pts without HTN [p = 0.0001]). Using HTN onset as a time-dependent covariate, HTN defined by max DBP was a significant predictor of prolonged TTP and PFS, and HTN defined by both max SBP and DBP was a significant predictor of prolonged OS (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, HTN defined by max SBP or DBP was a significant independent predictor of improved OS, PFS, and TTP (p < 0.0001). Analysis of any-grade and grade ≥3 cerebrovascular, ocular, cardiac, and renal AEs in pts with/without HTN is ongoing and will be presented. Clinical outcomes were not compromised in pts treated with anti-HTN medications. Conclusions: SU-associated HTN was significantly and independently associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting the hypothesis that HTN is a biomarker for antitumor efficacy in pts with GIST treated with SU. Serial BP monitoring and standard use of anti-HTN medications, which were not shown to compromise efficacy, are recommended during SU therapy. [Table: see text]

LENVAGIST - A multicenter, comparative, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, phase II study of the efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic GIST after failure of imatinib and sunitinib.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11568-TPS11568
Author(s):  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
Claire Cropet ◽  
Julien Gautier ◽  
Stéphanie Gagne ◽  
Katia Francourt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Double Blinded

TPS11568 Background: GastroIntestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are paradigmatic models of cancers with a driver mutation of an oncogene, in which imatinib is recommended as adjuvant therapy or treatment of locally advanced and metastatic forms. After failure of imatinib (either progression or toxicity), sunitinib and regorafenib are indicated as 2nd and 3rd lines, respectively. Beyond approved drugs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) can bring clinical benefit because some clones remain sensitive to TKI. Lenvatinib is a broad spectrum TKI targeting KIT, RET, PDGFRA, VEGFR 1-3 and FGFR 1-4, that is approved in the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib in adult GIST patients (pts) who failed at least to previous imatinib and sunitinib. Seventy-four pts will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral lenvatinib, at a daily dose of 24mg, or its matching placebo, continuously, until progression of disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization will be stratified according to the number of different previous anticancer drugs (2 or > 2). The primary objective is to compare the Progression-free survival (PFS) between arms. The expected median PFS are 1.5 month in the control arm and 3.0 months in the experimental arm (HR = 0.5). Seventy one events will provide 90% power to show significant improvement in PFS, using a 2-sided log-rank test at a 10% level. Secondary endpoints include the overall survival, the objective response rate, the best overall response, the quality of life and the safety profile. Patients allocated in the placebo arm who experience PD (RECIST 1.1) may switch to active lenvatinib. Radiological endpoints will be evaluated using the RECIST 1.1. Translational objectives will be to identify blood and tumor parameters as predictive markers of lenvatinib efficacy. Recruitment has been activated in January 2020. Ten participating sites of the French Sarcoma Group will participate in the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04193553 .

Superiority of Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil-Leucovorin Compared With Either Therapy Alone in Patients With Progressive Colorectal Cancer After Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-Leucovorin: Interim Results of a Phase III Trial

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2059-2069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mace L. Rothenberg ◽  
Amit M. Oza ◽  
Robert H. Bigelow ◽  
Jordan D. Berlin ◽  
John L. Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
North America ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Clinically Significant

Purpose: In North America, no effective therapy has been available for patients with progressive metastatic colorectal cancer after front-line treatment with irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (IFL). Patients and Methods: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after IFL therapy were randomly assigned to bolus and infusional FU and leucovorin (LV5FU2), single-agent oxaliplatin, or the combination (FOLFOX4). This planned interim analysis evaluated objective response rate (RR), time to tumor progression (TTP), and alleviation of tumor-related symptoms (TRS) in an initial cohort of patients. Results: Between November 2000 and September 2001, 463 patients from 120 sites in North America were randomly assigned to treatment. FOLFOX4 proved superior to LV5FU2 in all measures of clinical efficacy. Objective RRs determined by an independent radiology panel were 9.9% for FOLFOX4 versus 0% for LV5FU2 (Fisher’s exact test, P < .0001). Median TTP was 4.6 months for FOLFOX4 versus 2.7 months for LV5FU2 (two-sided, stratified log-rank test, P < .0001). Relief of TRS occurred in 33% of patients treated with FOLFOX4 versus 12% of patients treated with LVFU2 (χ2 test, P < .001). Single-agent oxaliplatin was not superior to LV5FU2 in any measure of efficacy. Patients treated with FOLFOX4 experienced a higher incidence of clinically significant toxicities than patients treated with LV5FU2, but these toxicities were predictable and did not result in a higher rate of treatment discontinuation or 60-day mortality rate. Conclusion: For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, second-line treatment with FOLFOX4 is superior to treatment with LVFU2 in terms of RR, TTP, and relief of TRS.

Phase III trial of induction gemcitabine (G) or paclitaxel (T) plus carboplatin (C) followed by elective T consolidation in advanced ovarian cancer (OC): Final safety and efficacy report.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5008-LBA5008 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Teneriello ◽  
A. N. Gordon ◽  
P. Lim ◽  
M. Janicek
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Significant Difference

LBA5008 Background: Safety and efficacy of GC or TC induction followed by elective T consolidation (Tcon) were evaluated. Methods: Patients (pts) with stage IC-IV epithelial OC were randomized to GC: G 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 plus C AUC=5 on day 1; or TC: T 175 mg/m2 plus C AUC=6 on day 1 for a total of six 21-day cycles. Pts with a complete response (CR) could receive Tcon 135 mg/m2every 28 days for 12 cycles. Non-CR pts received single-agent crossover (CO) therapy (CO-T 175 mg/m2 on day 1 or CO-G 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8) every 21 days until CR or progression of disease (PD). PD or death in 636 pts was required to compare GC and TC with 80% power for progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint. Efficacy results were compared by log-rank test. Results: The trial was stopped in 8/2009 after an ad hoc futility analysis showed low probability of a positive PFS result. Of 919 pts enrolled, 88 pts were excluded (clerical errors); 831 pts were entered; 820 pts had induction; 352 pts had Tcon (GC-Tcon=169, TC-Tcon=183); 155 pts had crossover (CO-T=77, CO-G=78); 313 pts discontinued after induction (GC=165, TC=148). Baseline pt characteristics were balanced across arms. Overall response and adverse events for induction regimens were similar to interim results (Gordon, Clin Ovar Cancer, 2009). For GC and TC, median PFS were 20.0 and 22.2 months; median overall survival (OS) were 43.8 and 57.3 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS (p=0.199) comparing GC and TC. Despite high censorship (GC: 52.8%, TC: 61.4%), OS was greater for TC (p=0.013) compared to GC, but there was no statistical difference after adjusting for significant covariates. For pts with CR, median OS was 65.6 months with Tcon versus 51.4 months without Tcon (p=0.041). Median OS was not reached for TC-Tcon and was 56.1 months for GC-Tcon (p=0.035). For pts not receiving Tcon or receiving either CO-T or CO-G crossover, there was no difference in OS. Conclusions: PFS was similar for GC and TC. Tcon improved OS. However, OS analysis was limited by study design and high censorship. GC does not offer an advantage over standard of care TC for first-line chemotherapy in advanced OC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sunitinib (SU) in combination with docetaxel (D) versus D alone for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA1010-LBA1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bergh ◽  
R. Greil ◽  
N. Voytko ◽  
A. Makhson ◽  
J. Cortes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recommended Treatment

LBA1010 Background: Taxane-based chemotherapy (CT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed HER2-negative metastatic BC (MBC). SU, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (MTKI), demonstrated antitumor activity in combination with D in a phase I/II study in pts with MBC. A randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial in pts with newly diagnosed ABC tested the hypothesis that addition of a MTKI to D improves PFS vs. D alone. Methods: Eligible pts (female; ≥18 yrs) had an ECOG PS ≤1, and newly diagnosed HER2-negative MBC or ABC. If (neo)adjuvant therapy included a taxane, relapse must have occurred ≥12 mos after CT. Pts were randomized (1:1) to treatment (tx) with D 75 mg/m2 iv on day 1 and SU 37.5 mg/day po from day 2–15 q3w (Schedule 2/1; Arm A), or to D 100 mg/m2 iv 1-hr infusion q3w (Arm B) that could be given until progression. If D was discontinued in Arm A for reasons other than progressive disease (PD), single-agent SU 37.5 mg daily was permitted until PD. Median, independently assessed, PFS (primary endpoint) was compared between tx arms using stratified and unstratified log-rank tests. Overall objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), pt-reported outcomes, and safety were secondary endpoints. Results: As of the data cutoff (February 1, 2010), the ITT population comprised 593 pts (SU+D, n=296; D, n=297). The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of prolonging PFS based on the independent radiologic assessment or in prolonging OS. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Median relative dose intensity (RDI) was 94.2% and 92.4% for SU+D, and 92.6% for D arms, respectively. Median PFS was 8.6 mos (95% CI 8.2–10.3) in the SU+D arm vs 8.3 mos (95% CI 7.7–9.6) for the D arm (HR 0.922). Median OS was 24.8 mos (95% CI 21.5–33.1) in SU+D arm vs 25.5 mos (95% CI 22.8–27.8) for D arm (HR 1.207). ORR was significantly better for SU+D (51%) vs. D (39%) (p=0.0018). Frequent all causality grade 3/4 adverse events (≥10%) were neutropenia (46%), hand–foot syndrome (17%), and fatigue (12%) in the SU+D arm and neutropenia (44%) in the D arm. Conclusions: Based on these data, SU+D is not a recommended treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed ABC. Strategies using antiangiogenic TKIs that increase RR but not OS may need to be revisited. [Table: see text]

Chemotherapy with erlotinib or chemotherapy alone in advanced NSCLC with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7524-7524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah B. Goldberg ◽  
Geoffrey R. Oxnard ◽  
Subba Digumarthy ◽  
Alona Muzikansky ◽  
David Michael Jackman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tki Resistance ◽  
Egfr Tkis

7524 Background: EGFR-mutant NSCLC has an oncogene-addicted phenotype that confers sensitivity to EGFR TKIs. Prior data suggests EGFR addiction persists after development of TKI resistance, leading many clinicians to continue TKI along with chemotherapy (chemo); however, this strategy has not been formally evaluated. Methods: An institutional database was reviewed to identify patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC and acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs by Jackman criteria. Pts were included if they subsequently received chemo. Objective response rate (RR) to chemo/erlotinib or chemo alone was assessed by blinded radiographic review and compared by Fisher’s exact test and multivariable logistic regression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from TKI failure (defined as chemo initiation date) were compared by log-rank test and multivariable Cox analysis. Results: 78 pts were eligible (34 chemo/erlotinib, 44 chemo alone). 70 pts (90%) had a documented EGFR mutation and were on TKI for a median of 15 months (range 4-51); in the 8 pts with unknown genotype the median duration on TKI was 11 months (range 5-16). Baseline characteristics were well balanced except more pts received erlotinib as initial TKI in the chemo/erlotinib group. RR was evaluable in 57 pts and was higher with chemo/erlotinib compared to chemo alone (41% vs 18%; OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.09, 1.04; p=0.08). RR adjusted for chemo regimen and time to TKI failure yielded OR 0.20 (95% CI 0.05, 0.78; p=0.02), favoring chemo/erlotinib. Median PFS was 4.4 months in the chemo/erlotinib group and 4.2 months in the chemo alone group (crude HR=0.84, 95% CI 0.52, 1.38; p=0.50; adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.48, 1.29; p=0.34). There was no significant difference in OS in the crude or adjusted analyses. Conclusions: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to show that continuation of an EGFR TKI with chemo compared to chemo alone significantly increases the RR in pts with advanced NSCLC and acquired TKI resistance, though we did not observe an impact on PFS or OS. Continued concurrent TKI may be a valuable strategy, particularly for pts with symptomatic progression, when a higher response rate may be beneficial. Further study is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document