Effect of body mass index in patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer: A single-center U.S. experience.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Joyce Wong ◽  
Shams Rahman ◽  
Nadia Saeed ◽  
Hui-Yi Lin ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
...  

25 Background: With the rise of obesity in the U.S., the impact of body mass index (BMI) on surgical outcomes and survival in gastric cancer remains undetermined. Methods: An IRB-approved, prospectively-maintained institutional database of patients referred for surgical evaluation of gastric cancer was reviewed. Patients were stratified according to BMI: <18.5 (underweight), 18.5-25 (normal weight), 25.1-30 (overweight), and >30 (obese). Clinicopathologic factors and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using polytomous regression, Pearsons correlation and Kaplan Meier when appropriate. Results: From 1997-2012, 222 patients underwent exploration for gastric adenocarcinoma. Of these, 186 (84%) patients had BMI recorded: 9 (5%) with BMI<18.5, 72 (39%) 18.5-25, 62 (33%) 25.1-30, and 43 (23%) >30. 135 (73%) ultimately underwent resection. Operative factors including American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score and blood loss were not significantly associated with BMI. Increased BMI was associated with longer operative time, P=0.02. Pathologic factors including proximal tumor location, perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), positive surgical margins, and positive lymph nodes (LN+) were all associated with a worse OS. Although increased BMI was associated with a lower total lymph node count, P=0.004, the number of LN+ was not associated with BMI. Tumor location, PNI, LVI, margin status, and final pathologic stage were not significantly associated with BMI. Additionally, the use of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with BMI. Median OS for the group was 22 months. When stratified by BMI, median OS was improved with increased BMI: 21 months for <18.5, 13 months for 18.5-25, 28 months for 25-30, and 34 months for >30, P=0.02. Similarly, disease free survival (DFS) improved with increasing BMI: 2 months for <18.5, 7 months for 18.5-25, 15 months for 25.1-30, and 15 months for >30, P=0.02. Conclusions: Although BMI may impact the technical difficulty of resection for gastric cancer, increasing BMI is not associated with more aggressive disease. In this experience, increased BMI does not adversely impact OS or DFS.

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1033-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Davis ◽  
Emeline Aviki ◽  
J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain ◽  
Michael Worley ◽  
Ross Berkowitz ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on completion, complications, and clinical outcomes of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.MethodsPatients with optimally cytoreduced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC ovarian cancer treated with IP chemotherapy were retrospectively identified using an institutional review board–approved database. Clinical data were abstracted from the longitudinal medical record. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsNinety-two patients (35.5%) completed at least one cycle of IP chemotherapy. For these patients, there was no difference in histology, surgical complexity, or degree of cytoreduction based on BMI. Sixty-five percent of normal weight, 70% of overweight, and 59.1% of obese women completed 6 cycles (P= 0.697). There was also no significant difference in IP chemotherapy complications (P= 0.303). Body mass index had no impact on disease-free survival (P= 0.44) or overall survival, with a median overall survival of 68.5 months for normal weight, 65.9 months for overweight, and 61.7 months for obese women (P= 0.25). However, on multivariate analysis, obesity had an odds ratio of 2.92 (P= 0.02) for mortality. There was a trend toward treatment with intravenous chemotherapy (84.2%) over IP (15.8%) in patients with class II obesity (P= 0.06).DiscussionThere was no difference in completion of IP chemotherapy or complications with respect to BMI; however, there was a trend away from treatment with IP therapy in extreme obesity. These data suggest that IP chemotherapy is feasible in obese patients without incurring increased morbidity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Giesinger ◽  
JM Giesinger ◽  
DF Hamilton ◽  
J Rechsteiner ◽  
A Ladurner

Abstract Background Total knee arthroplasty is known to successfully alleviate pain and improve function in endstage knee osteoarthritis. However, there is some controversy with regard to the influence of obesity on clinical benefits after TKA. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on improvement in pain, function and general health status following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A single-centre retrospective analysis of primary TKAs performed between 2006 and 2016 was performed. Data were collected preoperatively and 12-month postoperatively using WOMAC score and EQ-5D. Longitudinal score change was compared across the BMI categories identified by the World Health Organization. Results Data from 1565 patients [mean age 69.1, 62.2% women] were accessed. Weight distribution was: 21.2% BMI < 25.0 kg/m2, 36.9% BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2, 27.0% BMI 30.0–34.9 kg/m2, 10.2% BMI 35.0–39.9 kg/m2, and 4.6% BMI ≥ 40.0 kg/m2. All outcome measures improved between preoperative and 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). In pairwise comparisons against normal weight patients, patients with class I-II obesity showed larger improvement on the WOMAC function and total score. For WOMAC pain improvements were larger for all three obesity classes. Conclusions Post-operative improvement in joint-specific outcomes was larger in obese patients compared to normal weight patients. These findings suggest that obese patients may have the greatest benefits from TKA with regard to function and pain relief one year post-op. Well balanced treatment decisions should fully account for both: Higher benefits in terms of pain relief and function as well as increased potential risks and complications. Trial registration This trial has been registered with the ethics committee of Eastern Switzerland (EKOS; Project-ID: EKOS 2020–00,879)


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3592
Author(s):  
Chong-Chi Chiu ◽  
Chung-Han Ho ◽  
Chao-Ming Hung ◽  
Chien-Ming Chao ◽  
Chih-Cheng Lai ◽  
...  

It has been acknowledged that excess body weight increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC); however, there is little evidence on the impact of body mass index (BMI) on CRC patients’ long-term oncologic results in Asian populations. We studied the influence of BMI on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and CRC-specific survival rates in CRC patients from the administrative claims datasets of Taiwan using the Kaplan–Meier survival curves and the log-rank test to estimate the statistical differences among BMI groups. Underweight patients (<18.50 kg/m2) presented higher mortality (56.40%) and recurrence (5.34%) rates. Besides this, they had worse OS (aHR:1.61; 95% CI: 1.53–1.70; p-value: < 0.0001) and CRC-specific survival (aHR:1.52; 95% CI: 1.43–1.62; p-value: < 0.0001) rates compared with those of normal weight patients (18.50–24.99 kg/m2). On the contrary, CRC patients belonging to the overweight (25.00–29.99 kg/m2), class I obesity (30.00–34.99 kg/m2), and class II obesity (≥35.00 kg/m2) categories had better OS, DFS, and CRC-specific survival rates in the analysis than the patients in the normal weight category. Overweight patients consistently had the lowest mortality rate after a CRC diagnosis. The associations with being underweight may reflect a reverse causation. CRC patients should maintain a long-term healthy body weight.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Chen ◽  
David McCarthy ◽  
Vasu Saini ◽  
Marie Brunet ◽  
Eric Peterson ◽  
...  

Background: Obesity is an established risk factor for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but its impact on clinical outcomes and mortality after AIS remains controversial. In this study, we evaluate the association of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (LVOS). Methods: We reviewed our prospective MT database for LVOS between 2015 and 2018. BMI was analyzed as a continuous and categorical variable with underweight BMI <18.5, normal BMI 18.5-24.9, overweight BMI 25-29.9, and obese BMI>30. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predictors of outcome. Results: 335 patients underwent MT with 7 (2.1%) patients classified as underweight, 107 (31.9%) normal, 141 (42.1%) overweight, and 80 (23.9%) obese. Compared to normal weight (reference), obese patients had higher rates of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, while underweight patients had higher rates of previous stroke and presentation NIHSS. The time from symptom onset to puncture, procedural techniques, and reperfusion success (>TICI 2b) was not significantly different between BMI categories. There was a significant inverse linear correlation between BMI and symptomatic hemorrhagic. In patients with successful reperfusion (>TICI 2b), there was also a significant bell-shaped relationship between BMI and functional independence (mRS < 3) with both low and high BMIs associated with worse outcomes. In patients without post-procedural symptomatic hemorrhage, there was a significant linear correlation between BMI and inpatient mortality. Conclusion: In LVOS patients treated with MT, BMI is inversely related with post-procedural symptomatic hemorrhage. Yet in those whom reperfusion is achieved, both lower and higher than normal BMI were associated with worse functional outcomes. Thus, the obesity paradox does not appear to pertain to mechanical thrombectomy, although larger prospective studies are necessary.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 00214-2020
Author(s):  
Magnus Svartengren ◽  
Gui-Hong Cai ◽  
Andrei Malinovschi ◽  
Jenny Theorell-Haglöw ◽  
Christer Janson ◽  
...  

Study objectivesObesity is often associated with lower lung function; however, the interaction of lung function with central obesity and physical inactivity is less clear. As such, we investigated the effect on lung function of body size (body mass index (BMI)), central obesity (waist circumference (WC)) and self-reported physical activity.MethodsLung function, height, weight and WC were measured in 22 743 participants (12 791 women), aged 45–75 years, from the EpiHealth cohort study. Physical activity, gender and educational level were assessed using a questionnaire.ResultsObesity, central obesity and physical inactivity were all associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). However, in participants without central obesity there was an increase in both FEV1 and FVC by BMI (% predicted FVC increasing from median 98%, interquartile range (IQR) 89–110% in underweight participants (BMI <20) to 103%, IQR 94–113% in obese participants (BMI ≥30)). In contrast, there was a decrease in % predicted FVC in participants with central obesity (from 98%, IQR 89–109% in the normal weight group to 95%, IQR 85–105% in the obese weight group). We further found a negative association between physical activity and lung function among those with low and high levels of physical activity (% predicted FEV1 97%, IQR 86–107% versus 103%, IQR 94–113%, respectively and % predicted FVC 96%, IQR 85–106% versus 103%, IQR 94–113%, respectively). All results remained when calculated by z-scores.ConclusionsThe association between BMI and lung function is dependent on the presence of central obesity. Independent of obesity, there is an association between physical activity and lung function.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard U. Garcia ◽  
Preetha L. Balakrishnan ◽  
Sanjeev Aggarwal

AbstractBackground:Obesity is a modifiable, independent risk factor for mortality and morbidity after cardiovascular surgery in adults. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of obesity on short-term outcomes in adolescents undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD).Methods:This retrospective chart review included patients 10–18 years of age who underwent CHD surgery. Our exclusion criteria were patients with a known genetic syndrome, heart transplantation, and patients with incomplete medical records. The clinical data collected included baseline demographics and multiple perioperative variables. Charting the body mass index in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth curves, the entire cohort was divided into three categories: obese (>95th percentile), overweight (85th–95th percentile), and normal weight (<85th percentile). The composite outcome included survival, arrhythmias, surgical wound infection, acute neurologic injury, and acute kidney injury.Results:The study cohort (n = 149) had a mean standard deviation (SD), body mass index (BMI) of 22.6 ± 6.5 g/m2, and 65% were male. There were 27 obese (18.1%), 24 overweight (16.1%), and 98 normal weight (65.8%) patients. Twenty-seven (18%) patients had composite adverse outcomes. Overweight and obese patients had significantly higher adverse outcomes compared with normal weight patients (odds ratio (OR): 2.9; confidence interval (CI): 1–8.5, p = 0.04 and OR: 3; CI: 1–8.5, p = 0.03, respectively). In multivariate analysis, obesity was an independent predictor of adverse outcome in our cohort (p = 0.04).Conclusions:Obesity is associated with short-term adverse outcome and increased health resource utilisation in adolescents following surgery for CHD. Further studies should evaluate if intervention in the preoperative period can improve outcomes in this population.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2784-2784
Author(s):  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Giuseppina Loglisci ◽  
Adriano Salaroli ◽  
Alessandra Serrao ◽  
Paola Volpicelli ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2784 Obesity, measured as body mass index (BMI), has been identified as a possible risk factor for the onset of several solid tumors as well as for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). To date, no correlations have been reported in this latter disease between BMI at baseline and response to targeted therapies. We refer here on the impact of BMI on clinical response in CML. Three hundred and thirty-nine chronic phase (CP) CML patients treated with imatinib entered the study: 142 patients first received interferon alpha outside clinical trials and were then switched to imatinib for failure. For this group of patients, BMI was collected at the time of start of imatinib. The remaining patients were consecutively treated with imatinib first-line from January 2000 onward. BMI was defined as the individual's body weight divided by the square of his of her height and patients were categorised according to WHO into four categories: underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5-< 25), overweight (BMI 25-<30) and obese (BMI ≥ 30). All patients were followed according to ELN guidelines. We also analysed 25 CP-CML patients treated frontline with nilotinib. One hundred and fifty-six patients (46%) were categorized as underweight/normalweight, while 183 patients (54%) were classified as overweight/obese. BMI increased with age, with a median age of 29 years in underweight category, 43.4 years in normal weight, 54.9 years in overweight and 62.4 years in obese patients (p=0.001). We did not reveal statistically significant association between BMI and prognostic risk stratification at baseline, even when we used new EUTOS score, or type of BCR/ABL transcript. No statistically significant difference was revealed in terms of overall CCyR rate which was 87% for underweight/normal weight categories compared to 84% for overweight/obese group (p=0.34). If compared to patients with low BMI (< 18.5–25), patients with increased BMI (> 25–40) at diagnosis who received imatinib, showed a significantly longer median time to reach CCyR (6.8 months vs 3.3 months, p=0.01), a reduced rate of MMR (77% vs 58%, p=0.01) which was also achieved in a longer median time (29 months compared to 14 months, p=0.03). At 18 months, molecular kinetics revealed that median BCR-ABL/ABL ratio was 0.6% IS (range 0.001%-2%) in underweight/normal weight group compared to 1.6% IS (range 0.01%-3%) in overweight/obese category (p=0.01). Conversely, no differences were revealed with respect to BMI in patients treated frontline with nilotinib and also patients with increased BMI obtained rapidly CCyR and MMR, with an incidence similar to that of underweight/normal weight patients. These results suggest that CML patients with increased weight at baseline should be followed and carefully monitored if treated with standard dose imatinib frontline for a possible early switch to a second generation TKI or, as an alternative, should preferably be candidate to receive these drugs as a first line therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Euna Han ◽  
Tae Hyun Kim

SummaryThis study assesses differential labour performance by body mass index (BMI), focusing on heterogeneity across three distinct employment statuses: unemployed, self-employed and salaried. Data were drawn from the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study. The final sample included 15,180 person-year observations (9645 men and 5535 women) between 20 and 65 years of age. The findings show that (i) overweight/obese women are less likely to have salaried jobs than underweight/normal weight women, whereas overweight/obese men are more likely to be employed in both the salaried and self-employed sectors than underweight/normal men, (ii) overweight/obese women have lower wages only in permanent salaried jobs than underweight/normal weight women, whereas overweight/obese men earn higher wages only in salaried temporary jobs than underweight/normal weight women, (iii) overweight/obese women earn lower wages only in service, sales, semi-professional and blue-collar jobs in the salaried sector than underweight/normal weight women, whereas overweight/obese men have lower wages only in sales jobs in the self-employed sector than underweight/normal weight women. The statistically significant BMI penalty in labour market outcomes, which occurs only in the salaried sector for women, implies that there is an employers’ distaste for workers with a high BMI status and that it is a plausible mechanism for job market penalty related to BMI status. Thus, heterogeneous job characteristics across and within salaried versus self-employed sectors need to be accounted for when assessing the impact of BMI status on labour market outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 708-708
Author(s):  
Priyanka Arora ◽  
Bani Tamber Aeri

Abstract Objectives There is emerging evidence regarding the association of maternal overweight/obesity with an array of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcome. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of higher pre- pregnancy body mass index (BMI) on pregnancy outcomes of women belonging to the upper socio-economic strata of North West Delhi. Methods An observational longitudinal study was conducted among 312 pregnant women attending the private antenatal clinics in North-West, Delhi, India during July 2018 to March 2020. Only women with pre-pregnancy BMI: &gt;18.5kg/m2 who belonged to upper socio-economic strata and with confirmed singleton pregnancies were included in study. All the eligible subjects were enrolled at ≤ 16th week of their pregnancies and further stratified on basis of pre-pregnancy BMI criteria for the Asian-Indians,2009 i.e.,: normal weight;18.5–22.9kg/m2 (n:90), overweight; 23–24.9 kg/m2 (n = 90) and obese; ≥25 kg/m2 (n = 132). The primary outcome of study was macrosomia (birth weight: &gt;3.5kg). Secondary outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypothyroid, pre-eclampsia (PE), pre-term birth (PTB), cesarean section (CS), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, miscarriage and still birth. Mixed and fixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed with normal weight category women as a reference group. Results Incidence of adverse pregnancy outcome increased as pre-pregnancy BMI increases. Obese and overweight women had greater risk of undergoing CS (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.9–1.05) and delivering a macrosomic neonate (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 0.38–14.81 and OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.18–5.82) than normal weight women. Neonates of obese (OR: 1.30, 95%, CI:0.67–2.52) and overweight (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.67–2.66) women had a higher risk of NICU admissions. Conclusions Data indicated detrimental effect of higher pre-pregnancy BMI for both mother and as well as the neonate. It would be prudent to strive for normal pre-pregnancy BMI to reduce the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcome and lay a healthy foundation for an offspring. Funding Sources The financial assistance for present study was provided by the University Grant Commission (UGC), Government of India, under Junior/Senior Fellow Scheme.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Lei ◽  
Wang Jian Gang ◽  
Zheng Xing ◽  
Yu Xin

Abstract Background : To investigate the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the short-term and long-term outcome s including disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rate in patients with liver carcinoma who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) as primary treatment.Methods: Data were collected from 137 patients with liver carcinoma who underwent attempted LH between August 2003 and April 2014. Patients were classified into three groups depending on their BMI according to the WHO’s definition of obesity for Asia-Pacific region: underweight (BMI< 18.5kg/ m 2 , Group1), normal (18.5≤BMI< 23kg/m 2, Group2), overweight (BMI≥ 23kg/m 2, Group3) respectively. Short-term and long-term outcome s including overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were compared across the BMI categories.Results: Of the 137 patients, 14 were underweight, 65 were normal weight, and 58 were overweight. The overall conversion rate of 137 patients was 20.44 %. Conversion rate in the three groups was 14.29%, 21.54% and 20.69 % (P=0.8284). The median follow-up duration was 26 months , 30 months , and 28 months, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay in the three groups were comparable (10.85±4.04, 11.57±5.56 , and 10.88±5.70, P=0.76). The complications rate was much higher in Group 1 (42.85%) than that in Group 2 and Group 3 (20.08% and 17.2%, P=0.048). Underweight patients were more likely to develop grade III or higher postoperative complications ( Clavien-Dindo classification ) as compared to normal and overweight patients (P=0.042). Overweight patients had a longer 3- and 5-years DFS (41.4%, 36.2%) than those for underweight (21.4%, 14.3%) and normal weight (28.1%, 21.9%) patients (P=0.048, and 0.025). Overweight patients had a longer 5-years OS (44.8%) than those for underweight (28.6%) and normal weight (28.0%) patients (P=0.043).Conclusions : Being underweight was associated with an increased perioperative complication and being overweight has a better 3-, 5-years DFS and 5-years OS than those in under and normal weight patients with liver carcinoma who underwent LH. Key Word s: body mass index, liver carcinoma, Prognosis, laparoscopic hepatectomy


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document