Physician perceptions about goals of care of hospitalized patients with malignancies.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19234-e19234
Author(s):  
Nino Balanchivadze ◽  
Alexander Antoni Slota ◽  
Andrew Mangano ◽  
Adam Kudirka ◽  
Yaser Alkhatib
Keyword(s):  
Hospice Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Actual Condition ◽  
Real Patient ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Primary Care Residency ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Hospice Referral

e19234 Background: More sophisticated treatment techniques in cancer management have led to increased complexity in patient care. The perception of cancer outcomes is different between physicians and may result in premature hospice referral in hospitalized patients with or without cancer-related acute illness. We created a clinical scenario-based survey to assess perceptions of goals of care choices of inpatient primary providers while caring for patients with malignancies. Methods: A survey was developed and sent to all internal medicine and primary care residency programs nationwide via “Survey Monkey” online platform. Cases were adapted from real patient encounters. A total of 8 cases were presented and physicians were asked to determine level of care. Two cases represented potentially curable disease, three described patients with treatable but incurable malignancies, and the remainder described patients with advanced malignancies appropriate for hospice care. Physicians were also questioned about patterns of consulting hematology/oncology (HO) and their opinions regarding barriers in providing care to patients with malignancies. Results: Of 269 physicians who took the survey, 184 physicians (68%) fully completed it. 37% reported consulting HO for every patient with underlying malignancy, while 2% of the providers do not have access to HO consultants. In curable cancers, 65% of physicians would request inpatient oncology consultation while 11% would initiate hospice referral. There was a significant variation in choices for care in treatable cancer cases. In case 1, 13% of surveyed physicians thought that patients were hospice appropriate, while a higher percentage felt the same for the 2nd and 3rd cases with 18% and 52%, respectively. For hospice-appropriate patients, 25% of providers felt that further cancer treatment should be performed in younger patients, while the majority agreed on hospice referral (91%) for older patients. The most reported barrier to providing care to hospitalized patients with malignancies was a disconnect between the perception of goals of care of the primary treating oncologist/hematologist and patient’s actual condition. Conclusions: Perceptions about goals of care in hospitalized patients with malignancies varies and is affected by patient age and perceived severity of disease, which doesn’t necessarily translate into outcome statistics reported in literature. A multidisciplinary approach and treating oncologist involvement might be warranted when patient goals of care change is planned in hospital setting.

scholarly journals Process Mapping to Examine How Goals of Care Discussions and Decisions about Life-Sustaining Treatments Occur On Medical Wards: A Multi-Center Observational Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-25
Author(s):  
Dev Jayaraman ◽  
Nishan Sharma ◽  
Alannah Smrke ◽  
Jessica Simon ◽  
Peter Dodek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Nous Avons ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Communication Process ◽  
Prise De Décision ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Travailleurs De La Santé

BackgroundPoor quality communication about goals of care with seriously ill, hospitalized patients is associated with substantial discordance between prescribed medical orders for life-sustaining treatment and patients’ stated preferences. Designing tailored solutions to this discordance requires a better understanding of this communication process. ObjectiveTo acquire a detailed understanding of the process of communication about goals of care and decision making about life-sustaining treatments for hospitalized patients, and to seek opportunities for improvement. SettingMedical wards of three university-affiliated teaching hospitals in Canada. MethodAt each site, we used drop-in sessions and one-on-one interviews to consult with health care workers on eligible wards to create cross-functional (swim lane) maps of the process of communication about goals of care and decision making about life-sustaining treatments. Healthcare workers were also asked about barriers to this process to enable the identification of opportunities for improvement. ResultsA total of 112 healthcare workers provided input into the creation of process maps across the three sites. Common elements across sites were that: (1) physicians play a central role, (2) the full process for a given patient involves several interactions amongst members of the inter-professional team, and (3) the process is iterative. We also noted between-site variations in the location of GoC discussions and the extent to which trainees and multi-disciplinary team members were involved. Finally, we identified several key barriers that may serve as targets for future quality improvement efforts: suboptimal location of conversations, insufficient support of physician learners in goals-of-care conversations, and incomplete engagement of the inter-professional team. ConclusionEfforts to improve the quality of goals-of-care discussions and decision making about life-sustaining treatments in the hospital setting need to account for the central role played by physicians in the process but can be enhanced if they can more fully engage the inter-professional health care team.Resume Contexte Une communication de mauvaise qualité sur les objectifs des soins aux patients gravementmalades et hospitalisés est associée à une discordance importante entre les ordonnances médicales prescrites pour un traitement de survie et les préférences déclarées des patients. La conception de solutions adaptées à cette discordance nécessite une meilleure compréhension de ce processus de communication. ObjectifAcquérir une compréhension détaillée du processus de communication sur les objectifs des soins et la prise de décision sur les traitements de maintien de la vie pour les patients hospitalisés, et rechercher des possibilités d’amélioration. ParamètresLes services médicaux de trois hôpitaux universitaires canadiens affiliés à l’université. MéthodeSur chaque site, nous avons eu recours à des séances d’information et à des entretiens individuels pour consulter les travailleurs de la santé dans les services éligibles afin de créer des cartes interfonctionnelles (couloir de nage) du processus de communication sur les objectifs des soins et la prise de décision sur les traitements de maintien des fonctions vitales. Les travailleurs de la santé ont également été interrogés sur les obstacles à ce processus afin de permettre l’identification des possibilités d’amélioration. RésultatsAu total, 112 travailleurs de la santé ont participé à la création de cartes de processus sur les trois sites. Les éléments communs à tous les sites étaient les suivants : (1) les médecins jouent un rôle central, (2) le processus complet pour un patient donné implique plusieurs interactions entre les membres de l’équipe interprofessionnelle, et (3) le processus est itératif. Nous avons également noté des variations entre les sites en ce qui concerne le lieu des discussions du gouvernement et le degré d’implication des stagiaires et des membres de l’équipe pluridisciplinaire. Enfin, nous avons identifié plusieurs obstacles clés qui pourraient servir de cibles aux futurs efforts d’amélioration de la qualité : le lieu sous-optimal des conversations, le soutien insuffisant des apprenants médecins dans les conversations sur les objectifs de soins et l’engagement incomplet de l’équipe interprofessionnelle. ConclusionLes efforts visant à améliorer la qualité des discussions sur les objectifs des soins et la prise de décision concernant les traitements vitaux en milieu hospitalier doivent tenir compte du rôle central joué par les médecins dans le processus, mais peuvent être renforcés s’ils peuvent faire participer davantage l’équipe interprofessionnelle de soins de santé.

Goals of care discussion and hospice enrollment.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 229-229
Author(s):  
Annika Gustafson ◽  
Mallika Sharma ◽  
Tracy Wong ◽  
Keith D. Eaton
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Provider Type ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Hospice Referral ◽  
Wish To Die

229 Background: When asked, many people wish to die at home. Yet, more than one third of cancer patients with poor prognosis die in hospital. Enrollment in hospice care is associated with reduced receipt of high-intensity care toward the end of life. Hospice is palliative care tailored to patients in the last 6 months of life. The ability to collect, organize, analyze and report documented Goals of Care (GOC) conversation data and the relationship to hospice enrollment is challenging. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA) created a process to establish a sample baseline of documented GOC discussions, the healthcare setting in which they took place, and how this relates to hospice enrollment. Methods: We selected a sample of 50 decedent charts. Patients were verified as period of 6 months from date of death, documenting provider type, care setting that documented discussion took place and chart search terms. Results: Our sample consisted of 50 adult solid tumor cancer patients who died between March-May 2018. Using an SCCA created GOC discussion definition adapted from Ariadne Labs Serious Illness Care program, we found that 52% of patients had a GOC discussion in the last 6 months of life and of these, 92% discussed hospice with a provider, 77% received a hospice referral and 62% enrolled in hospice. 48% of our decedent sample did not have a GOC discussion. 46% had a hospice discussion of whom 100% enrolled in hospice. 46% received a hospice referral. 54% of patients did not discuss hospice of whom 30% enrolled in hospice. In looking at which providers talked with patients about hospice and in what care setting, we found that 44% discussed hospice with outpatient medical oncologist, 10% discussed hospice with an outpatient provider, 16% had a discussion while inpatient, and 30% had no hospice discussion at all. Conclusions: The majority of GOC discussions happened in the outpatient setting with medical oncologists. Many patients never had a discussion about hospice with their provider. Patients were most likely to enroll in hospice when it was specifically discussed, regardless of whether a GOC discussion took place.

Nurses’ Communication of Prognosis and Implications for Hospice Referral: A Study of Nurses Caring for Terminally Ill Hospitalized Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dena Schulman-Green ◽  
Ruth McCorkle ◽  
Emily Cherlin ◽  
R. Johnson-Hurzeler ◽  
Elizabeth H. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Hospice Care ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Terminally Ill ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Staff Nurses ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Terminally Ill Patients ◽  
Hospice Referral

• Background Although nurses are ideally situated to facilitate communication about prognosis and hospice referral among patients, patients’ family members, and hospital staff, nurses do not always assume this task. • Objective To identify common obstacles to nurses’ discussions of prognosis and referral to hospice care with terminally ill patients in the hospital setting. • Methods Data from a previous study were analyzed. In that study, a total of 174 experienced staff nurses working full-time in hospital practice areas where terminally ill patients routinely receive care at 6 randomly selected community hospitals in Connecticut participated. Each nurse completed a self-administered, cross-sectional survey. In this study, the open-ended responses of the nurses were examined by using content analysis and descriptive analysis. • Results The most common obstacles were unwillingness of a patient or the patient’s family to accept the prognosis and/or hospice, sudden death or noncommunicative status of the patient, belief of physicians’ hesitance, nurses’ discomfort, and nurses’ desire to maintain hope among patients and patients’ families. • Conclusions The reasons for noncommunication of prognosis and referral to hospice care by nurses are complex. Because limited discussion between clinicians and patients about prognosis and treatment options can reduce the likelihood of referral to hospice care, improved communication skills may result in more referrals and a smoother transition to hospice.

Quality Measures for Symptoms and Advance Care Planning in Cancer: A Systematic Review

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (30) ◽  
pp. 4933-4938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl A. Lorenz ◽  
Joanne Lynn ◽  
Sydney Dy ◽  
Anne Wilkinson ◽  
Richard A. Mularski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
English Language ◽  
Basic Research ◽  
Quality Measures ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Advance Care

Purpose Measuring quality of care for symptom management and ascertaining patient goals offers an important step toward improving palliative cancer management. This study was designed to identify systematically the quality measures and the evidence to support their use in pain, dyspnea, depression, and advance care planning (ACP), and to identify research gaps. Methods English-language documents were selected from MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, PsycINFO (1995 to 2005); Internet-based searches; and contact with measure developers. We used terms for each domain to select studies throughout the cancer care continuum. We included measures that expressed a normative relationship to quality, specified the target population, and specified the indicated care. Dual data review and abstraction was performed by palliative care researchers describing populations, testing, and attributes for each measure. Results A total of 4,599 of 5,182 titles were excluded at abstract review. Of 537 remaining articles, 19 contained measures for ACP, six contained measures for depression, five contained measures for dyspnea, and 20 contained measures for pain. We identified 10 relevant measure sets that included 36 fully specified or fielded measures and 14 additional measures (16 for pain, five for dyspnea, four for depression, and 25 for ACP). Most measures were unpublished, and few had been tested in a cancer population. We were unable to describe the specifications of all measures fully and did not search for measures for pain and depression that were not cancer specific. Conclusion Measures are available for assessing quality and guiding improvement in palliative cancer care. Existing measures are weighted toward ACP, and more nonpain symptom measures are needed. Additional testing is needed before the measures are used for accountability, and basic research is required to address measurement when self-report is impaired.

scholarly journals Influence of Patient Goals of Care on Performance Measures in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Finlay A. McAlister ◽  
Julie Wang ◽  
Linda Donovan ◽  
Douglas S. Lee ◽  
Paul W. Armstrong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Patient Goals

Quality Improvement Initiatives to Reduce Mortality: An Opportunity to Engage Palliative Care and Improve Advance Care Planning

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Signe Peterson Flieger ◽  
Erica Spatz ◽  
Emily J. Cherlin ◽  
Leslie A. Curry
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Advance Care

Background: Despite substantial efforts to integrate palliative care and improve advance care planning, both are underutilized. Quality improvement initiatives focused on reducing mortality may offer an opportunity for facilitating engagement with palliative care and advance care planning. Objective: In the context of an initiative to reduce acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality, we examined challenges and opportunities for engaging palliative care and improving advance care planning. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected through the Leadership Saves Lives initiative between 2014 and 2016. Data included in-depth interviews with hospital executives, clinicians, administrators, and quality improvement staff (n = 28) from 5 hospitals participating in the Mayo Clinic Care Network. Focused analysis examined emergent themes related to end-of-life experiences, including palliative care and advance care planning. Results: Participants described challenges related to palliative care and advance care planning in the AMI context, including intervention decisions during an acute event, delivering care aligned with patient and family preferences, and the culture around palliative care and hospice. Participants proposed strategies for addressing such challenges in the context of improving AMI quality outcomes. Conclusions: Clinicians who participated in an initiative to reduce AMI mortality highlighted the challenges associated with decision-making regarding interventions, systems for documenting patient goals of care, and broader engagement with palliative care. Quality improvement initiatives focused on mortality may offer a meaningful and feasible opportunity for engaging palliative care. Primary palliative care training is needed to improve discussions about patient and family goals of care near the end of life.

Documentation of goals of care (GOC) by medical oncologists is associated with improved oncology patient end-of-life (EOL) care outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1507-1507
Author(s):  
Han Xiao ◽  
Michael Riley ◽  
Richard Donopria ◽  
Steven Martin ◽  
Judith Eve Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Oncology Patient ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Hospice Referral ◽  
Care Outcomes ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
The Impact

1507 Background: Documenting GOC is integral to patient care and quality performance but has been underutilized by oncologists due to many barriers. As oncologists play a key role in initiating GOC discussions, we implemented a clinical initiative to improve their GOC documentation and evaluated the impact of such documentation on patient care during the EOL (last 30 days of life). Methods: We launched the initiative among 270 medical oncologists in an academic cancer center in 4/2020. A newly formulated GOC note to ease documentation was embedded in oncology outpatient and inpatient notes. Oncologists completed components in the GOC note that applied to their communication about GOC with the patient: 1) cancer natural history, 2) patient goals, and 3) EOL discussion: patient resuscitation preferences and, when pertinent, receptivity to hospice referral. GOC notes were pulled to a centralized location in the electronic health record (EHR) that displays documents relevant to patients’ values, goals and preferences. A dashboard allowed continual monitoring of documentation performance. We evaluated the association between GOC notes and outcomes of patient care at EOL. We further analyzed the impact of EOL discussion on EOL care. Results: The GOC note completion rate steadily rose after implementation. GOC notes were present in EHR for 46% of 10,006 patients who were either seen in outpatient clinic or discharged from hospital during the 1st week of January 2021. Among 1790 patients who died between 7/1/20 and 12/31/20 and had either at least an outpatient visit or hospitalization during EOL, the median days from first GOC note and first EOL discussion to the patient’s death were 71 days and 24 days, respectively. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that patients who had GOC note 60 days before death spent less time as inpatient during EOL (0.4 day less/patient, from 8.1 to 7.7, P = 0.01). When EOL discussion was documented 30 days before death, patients also spent less time in the hospital (1.2 days less/patient, from 9.7 to 8.5, P < 0.001) and in the ICU (0.3 days less/patient, from 1.7 to 1.4 ICU days, P = 0.04), and were 4% less likely to receive chemotherapy (from 38% to 34%, P = 0.004) at EOL. During the same period, among 1,009 patients with hospital admission in the last 30 days of life, those with a prior documented EOL discussion had shorter inpatient stay (7.7 vs 13.1 days, P < 0.001) and were more likely to be discharged to hospice (34% vs 22%, P = 0.003). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we successfully implemented GOC documentation by medical oncologists that is easily visible by the full care team. Documentation of GOC including EOL discussion was associated with fewer days in the hospital and ICU, increased hospice referral, and lower likelihood of receiving chemotherapy during patients’ last 30 days of life.

Nursing diagnoses in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Hidayati ◽  
Farhan Hadi ◽  
Suratmi Suratmi ◽  
Isni Lailatul Maghfiroh ◽  
Esti Andarini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
Knowledge Deficit ◽  
Nursing Diagnoses

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has become a global public health issue, and the roles of nurses are very much needed in providing nursing services in the current situation. The enforcement of appropriate nursing diagnoses for patients with COVID-19 is also fundamental in determining proper nursing care to help the patients achieve maximum health. Objective: This study aimed to describe and analyze nursing diagnoses in patients with COVID-19 treated in the isolation rooms and ICUs. Methods: This study used a secondary data analysis from hospital medical record data of patients with COVID-19 from early December 2020 to the end of February 2021. Data were selected using a cluster random sampling technique and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The results showed that the signs and symptoms of the patients with COVID-19 that often appeared were fever, cough, shortness of breath, and decreased consciousness. The common nursing diagnoses in the hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were hyperthermia, ineffective airway clearance, gas exchange disorder, self-care deficit, spontaneous ventilation disorder, spontaneous circulation disorder, knowledge deficit, and shock risk. Conclusion: This study offers an insight into nursing practices in the hospital setting, which can be used as a basis for nurses to perform complete nursing assessments and nursing diagnoses during the pandemic.

PP231 Safety, Effectiveness And Economic Analysis Of Exercise Intervention For Prevention Of Cognitive And Functional Deterioration In Hospitalized Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
Beatriz León-Salas ◽  
Renata Linertová ◽  
Javier García-García ◽  
Pilar Pérez-Ros ◽  
Francisco Rivas-Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Cognitive Capacity ◽  
Cognitive State ◽  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Budgetary Impact ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Functional Deterioration

IntroductionCognitive and functional deterioration is common in hospital setting and occurs in 40 percent of admitted older patients. One of its main causes is physical inactivity. The objective of our health technology assessment was to assess the safety and clinical effectiveness of a structured multicomponent intervention of physical exercise (Vivifrail) for the prevention of the cognitive and functional deterioration in hospitalized patients aged 70 years or older and to estimate costs and the budgetary impact for the Spanish National Health Service.MethodsA systematic review of available scientific literature (including experimental and observational designs) on the safety and effectiveness of Vivifrail was performed. A costing study and budgetary impact analysis of the incorporation of Vivifrail as a therapeutic alternative to standard care with a time horizon of 5 years was performed.ResultsOne randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n = 370) showed positive effects of Vivifrail compared to usual care in functional capacity (mean difference (MD) = 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.78 to 2.62), cognitive state (MD = 1.80, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.36), and quality of life (MD = 13.20, 95% CI 12.70 to 13.70). Regarding other variables, the Vivifrail increased the grip strength of the dominant hand (MD = 2.30; 95% CI = 1.79 to 2.81), verbal fluency (MD = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.56 to 2.74), performance of double tasks (MD = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.13), executive function (MD = −31.07; 95% CI = −49.23 to −12.91) and emotional state (MD = −2.00; 95% CI = −2.50 to −1.50).The total cost of implementing Vivifrail in a 1,000-bed general hospital would be EUR18,000 per year (adjusted to 2020 currency), with approximately 150 patients older than 75 years benefited. This represents a cost of EUR120 per patient.ConclusionsThe Vivifrail could improve functional and cognitive capacity, although available evidence on the Vivifrail is very scarce. More well designed and executed RCT and cost-effectiveness study confirming or refuting the promising findings are needed for a new assessment.

How Does the Timing of Hospice Referral Influence Hospice Care in the Last Days of Life?

2003 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan C. Miller ◽  
Barry Kinzbrunner ◽  
Peggy Pettit ◽  
J. Richard Williams
Keyword(s):  
Hospice Care ◽  
Hospice Referral
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document