Preliminary efficacy and safety of perioperative treatment of camrelizumab combined with apatinib in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A prospective phase II study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4082-4082
Author(s):  
Yongxiang Xia ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
Liyong Pu ◽  
Xiaofeng Qian ◽  
Feng Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Histopathological Examination ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Marker Gene ◽  
High Recurrence Rate ◽  
Perioperative Treatment ◽  
Informed Consent Form ◽  
Grade 3

4082 Background: Although there is no standard perioperative treatment for resectable HCC characterized with high recurrence rate, the strategy of immunotherapy combined with targeted agents is promising in neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in various tumors. Methods: In this perspective, single-arm, exploratory phase II trial (NCT04297202), eligible patients (pts) were systemic treatment-naive resectable HCC in intermediate/advanced stage. Preoperative combined treatment of anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab (200 mg q2w for 3 cycles) and VEGFR-2 inhibitor apatinib (250 mg qd for 21 days) was started on day 1 cycle 1. On the 7th day after the 3 cycles, radiological imaging was assessed to confirm whether to conduct the hepatectomy. Four weeks after the surgery, combined treatment (camrelizumab 200 mg q3w, apatinib 250 mg qd, 3 weeks per cycle) was resumed for the postoperative 8 cycles. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR) defined as 50%-99% tumor necrosis in resected tissue. Gene expression profiles (GEPs) using immune-related RNA with pre-treatment specimens were analyzed. The association between immune signatures and pathological response (responders (R) vs. non-responders (NR)) was assessed. Results: A total of 20 pts were enrolled between Dec 5, 2019 and Jan 27, 2021, with a median follow-up of 5.7 months (range 0.7-9.0). All pts were ECOG PS 0-1 and Child-Pugh class A. There were 85% pts with hepatitis B and 10% with hepatitis C, and 55% in BCLC stage B, 35% in stage C and 10% in stage A. In preoperative phase, with 2 withdraw of informed consent form, partial response was reached in 3/18 (16.7%) and 8/18 (44.4%) pts per RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, respectively, while disease progression was found in 1/18 (5.6%) pts impossible for hepatectomy, which made the resection rate 17/18 (94.4%). After the surgery, one was found to be combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma by histopathological examination and failed to proceed the postoperative study. The rates of MPR and pathological complete response (pCR) were 5/17 (29.4%) and 1/17 (5.9%), respectively. The preliminary analysis of GEPs (R:NR = 3:4) revealed higher levels of chemokines ( CXCL10 and CXCL11) in responders and higher MS4A4A (marker gene of macrophages ) in non-responders. The most common TEAEs included hypertension (95%), proteinuria (40%), AST elevation (40%), and platelet count decrease (45%). Grade 3 TEAEs were hypertension (20%), rash (10%), and platelet count decrease (10%). No grade 4/5 TEAEs was observed. The most common surgical complications were ALT and AST increase each with the incidence of 70% (all grades) and 45% (grade ≥ 3). Conclusions: This study preliminarily demonstrated that the perioperative treatment of camrelizumab combined with apatinib improved the MPR and pCR with managable safety in intermediate/advanced resectable HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04297202.

NEONAX trial: Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant or only adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for resectable pancreatic cancer, a phase II study of the AIO pancreatic cancer group (AIO-PAK-0313)—Safety interim analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4128-4128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waldemar Uhl ◽  
Thomas Jens Ettrich ◽  
Anke C. Reinacher-Schick ◽  
Hana Algül ◽  
Helmut Friess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Perioperative Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

4128 Background: Survival in pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is still poor even after curatively intended resection. Perioperative treatment approaches improve outcome in various tumor entities. Data on perioperative treatment in resectable PDAC are limited and there is a debate whether neoadjuvant treatment might impair subsequent surgery by adding perioperative morbidity or mortality. Methods: NEONAX is a randomized phase II study (planned 166 patients) of perioperative gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Arm A: 2 pre- and 4 post-operative cycles, Arm B: 6 cycles adjuvant) for patients with primarily resectable PDAC. Primary objective is DFS at 18 months after randomization. Secondary objectives are 3-year OS-rate and DFS-rate, progression during neoadjuvant therapy, R0/R1 resection rate and QoL. Results: NEONAX was initiated in March 2015 in 26 centers for PDAC surgery in Germany. The data represent the safety interim analysis (IA) of the first 48 patients. 25 patients were randomized to Arm A and 23 to Arm B. Patients’ median age was 65.3 years (56.3% males, 43.8% females, 85.4% ECOG 0). Out of 25 patients in Arm A 20 patients (80%) underwent surgery, compared to 21 of 23 patients (91.3%) in Arm B with upfront surgery. Reasons for no resection were intraoperatively determined small liver metastases (2 cases, Arm A), withdrawal of informed consent (2 cases in each arm) and 1 patient with uncontrolled cholestasis (arm A). Postoperative complications occurred in 45% of arm A and 42.8% of arm B. (pancreatic fistula: 15% in arm A and 9.5% in arm B, infections: 10% in arm A and 9.5% in arm B) All resected patients were alive 60 days after surgery. At least 1 adverse event (AE) NCI-CTCAE ≥ grade 3 occurred in 60% of the perioperative and 39.1% of adjuvant treatment arm. Most common AEs were neutropenia (16.7%), fatigue (10.4%) and infections (10.4%). Conclusions: There was an increase in NCI-CTCAE ≥ grade 3 events in the perioperative arm, but this was manageable and did not result in increased peri- or postoperative mortality. 8% of patients in the perioperative arm did not get resected due metastases detectable during surgery, but not on preoperative imaging immediately prior to surgery. Therefore, it cannot be determined whether these metastases were preexistent or developed during neoadjuvant treatment. In conclusion, the first interim analysis of the NEONAX trial shows that this protocol can be safely applied to patients with resectable PDAC in a perioperative setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02047513.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Combined Ruxolitinib and Thalidomide in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Initial Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 354-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raajit K. Rampal ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Sean M Devlin ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Tapan M. Kadia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Platelet Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Among the most frequent and challenging hematologic manifestations of myelofibrosis (MF) are anemia and thrombocytopenia, the presence of which portends an adverse outcome. Few effective modalities to address these cytopenias exist, particularly thrombocytopenia. Further, although the FDA-approved JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib (RUX) has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in MF patients, RUX frequently results in anemia and thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia in particular often results in dose attenuation of RUX. Thalidomide (THAL) is a first-in-class immunomodulatory agent. Studies of THAL in MF patients, alone and with prednisone, have demonstrated improvements in anemia and thrombocytopenia. We therefore sought to examine whether combination of RUX and THAL could result in improvement in both disease-related and therapy-related cytopenias, as well as improve overall disease response in patients with MF. Here we report initial analysis of this study (NCT03069326). Methods: We conducted a multicenter two stage phase II trial designed to assess the effect of RUX and THAL combination in subjects with primary, post-polycythemia vera, or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Patients taking RUX at the time of enrollment must have had less than PR per IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria, or be refractory, to RUX single-agent therapy. Patients must have been taking RUX for a minimum of 3 months, and must have been on a stable dose of RUX for a minimum of 4 weeks immediately prior to enrollment. Treatment-naïve patients received single-agent RUX for 3 months (run-in phase) per label, and went on to combination therapy if they achieved less then a PR per IWG-MRT/ELN criteria. Each cycle of therapy was 28 days. Response assessment was evaluated according to the IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria. Platelet response criteria in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia (less than lower limit of normal) included: Major response (≥75% increase in platelet count), Intermediate Response (≥50% increase) and Minor Response (≥25% increase). Adverse events were assessed using the NCI CTCAE v. 4.0. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treated subjects that achieved a response by IWG-MRT criteria and by platelet response criteria. Results: A total of 25 patients are planned to be accrued. At the time of this writing, a total of 18 patients have been accrued. The median age was 70.5 years (47-85). 8 patients had received prior therapies other than RUX, including imetelstat, momelotinib, danazol, pomalidomide, darbepoetin alpha and sotatercept. 7 patients enrolled to the run-in phase. 14 patients received red blood cell transfusions prior to study enrollment. Evaluation of platelet count in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia demonstrated a significant increase in platelet count at cycle 3 of therapy compared to baseline (Figure 1A and B; P<0.05). An increase in Hgb was observed over successive cycles of combination therapy (Figure 1C and D). 5 of 18 accrued patients completed ≥6 cycles of combined therapy at the time of abstract submission and were thus evaluable for response assessment. The overall response rate in these patients was 80% (4/5 patients). Clinical Improvement (Anemia response and Symptom response) occurred in 3 patients (both responses observed in all 3 patients). Major platelet response was observed in 4 of 5 patients with baseline thrombocytopenia. 1 patient met criteria for spleen response (Table 1). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events regardless of attribution included; limb edema, diverticulitis, hypertension, syncope. 1 patient experienced a thromboembolic event. 1 patient experienced a grade 3 hematologic AE (neutropenia). Conclusions: The combination of THAL and RUX has demonstrated a promising efficacy signal in this initial analysis of an ongoing phase II study, and appears to be well tolerated. Platelet count increases were observed in all patients who entered study with baseline thrombocytopenia, a response which appears to be maintained in the majority of patients observed 6 months after starting combination therapy. As well, anemia responses were observed in 3 of 5 evaluable patients. Collectively, these data indicate a potential role for this regimen in patients with anemia and/or thrombocytopenia, who otherwise have limited treatment options. Updated data on duration of response and overall response of all accrued patients will be presented. Disclosures Rampal: Constellation: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stemline: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Stein:Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kadia:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mauro:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Pemmaraju:SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; plexxikon: Research Funding. Bose:Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding.

Dasatinib plus capecitabine (Cap) for progressive advanced breast cancer (ABC): Phase I study CA180004

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1012-1012
Author(s):  
G. Somlo ◽  
F. Atzori ◽  
L. Strauss ◽  
A. Rybicki ◽  
X. Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Study Laboratory

1012 Background: SRC family kinases (SFK) mediate numerous signal-transduction pathways relevant to breast cancer as well as osteoclast function. Dasatinib, a potent oral inhibitor of SFK and other kinases has preclinical activity in breast models and in vitro synergy with Cap in some breast cancer cell lines (KPL-4 and HCC-70). A phase I trial of dasatinib plus Cap was conducted to define dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated (MTD), and recommended phase II (RP2D) doses. Methods: Sequential cohorts of pts with ABC were treated with Cap twice daily (BID) on days 1–14 and dasatinib daily in 21-day cycles using dose levels (DL) for Cap (mg/m2) and dasatinib (mg): DL1: Cap 825 + dasatinib 50 BID; DL2: Cap 825 + dasatinib 70 BID; DL3: Cap 1000 + dasatinib 70 BID; DL3a: Cap 1000 + dasatinib 100 once daily (QD). All pts had ECOG performance status 0–1, had prior anthracycline and/or taxane, and received ≤2 regimens in advanced setting. MTD was based on DLT in first cycle and RP2D also based on tolerability of additional cycles. Results: 31 pts with ABC, median age 53 years (range 36–78) were treated. Number of pts treated/evaluable for DLT/reported DLT (event) were DL1: 7/6/1 (headache, grade 3); DL2: 9/7/0; DL3: 6/6/1 (diarrhea, grade 3), and DL3a: 9/9/1 (pneumonia, grade 3). Most frequent AEs related to either drug and occurring at any time on study (n pts) were nausea (12), vomiting (7), diarrhea (6), abdominal pain (2), fatigue (8), headache (7), musculoskeletal pain (1), and pleural effusion (4); hand-foot syndrome (5) was as expected for Cap alone. 11 patients experienced a Grade 3–4 non-hematologic AE at some point during the study. Laboratory abnormalities were uncommon. To date, 20 pts have continued treatment for ≥6 weeks and 9 pts for ≥12 weeks. Number of pts who (at any time) reduced dasatinib/reduced Cap/discontinued for toxicity were DL1: 2/2/1; DL2 2/2/3; DL3: 2/1/2; DL3a: 0/1/1. Updated safety and efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions: Dasatinib + Cap was tolerated without unexpected combined-treatment toxicity; few pts required dose reduction in later cycles. The recommended phase II dose, Cap 1000 plus dasatinib 100 QD, is well tolerated and will be studied for efficacy in an expanded patient cohort. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1948-1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zalcberg ◽  
M Millward ◽  
J Bishop ◽  
M McKeage ◽  
A Zimet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) and cisplatin are two of the most active single agents used in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A recently reported phase I study of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin recommended a dose of 75 mg/m2 of both drugs every 3 weeks for subsequent phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years with a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2 and life expectancy > or = 12 weeks, with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC proven histologically or cytologically. Patients were not permitted to have received prior chemotherapy, extensive radiotherapy, or any radiotherapy to the target lesion and must have had measurable disease. Concurrent treatment with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) or prophylactic antibiotics was not permitted. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in 250 mL 5% dextrose was given intravenously (i.v.) over 1 hour immediately before cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in 500 mL normal saline given i.v. over 1 hour in 3-week cycles. Premedication included ondansetron, dexamethasone, promethazine, and standard hyperhydration with magnesium supplementation. RESULTS A total of 47 patients, two thirds of whom had metastatic disease, were entered onto this phase II study. The majority of patients were male (72%) and of good (WHO 0 to 1) performance status (85%). All 47 patients were assessable for toxicity and 36 were for response. Three patients were ineligible and eight (17%) discontinued treatment because of significant toxicity. In assessable patients, the overall objective response rate was 38.9% (95% confidence limits [CL], 23.1% to 56.5%), 36.1% had stable disease, and 25% progressive disease. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 29.8%. Median survival was 9.6 months and estimated 1-year survival was 33%. Significant (grade 3/4) toxicities included nausea (26%), hypotension (15%), diarrhea (13%), and dyspnea mainly related to chest infection (13%). One patient experienced National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade 3 neurosensory toxicity after eight cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was common and occurred in 87% of patients, but thrombocytopenia > or = grade 3 was rare (one patient). Significant (grade 3/4) abnormalities of magnesium levels were common (24%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 13% of patients and neutropenic infection in 11%, contributing to two treatment-related deaths. No neutropenic enterocolitis or severe fluid retention was reported. CONCLUSION Compared with other active regimens used in this setting, the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced NSCLC is an active regimen with a similar toxicity profile to other combination regimens.

795 A multicenter phase II trial (SWOG S1609, cohort 51) of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma: a substudy of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A843-A843
Author(s):  
Michael Wagner ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Sandip Patel ◽  
Christopher Ryan ◽  
Ashish Sangal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Light Exposure ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundAngiosarcoma is a rare cancer of endothelial cells that can be aggressive and carries a high mortality. A subset of angiosarcomas are characterized by high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and UV light exposure DNA mutational signature. Isolated case reports have suggested clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in angiosarcoma; no prospective studies of immune checkpoint inhibition in angiosarcoma have been reported. We report efficacy analysis results for patients with advanced or unresectable angiosarcoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab as a cohort of an ongoing phase II study for rare cancers (NCT02834013).MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1mg/kg IV q6weeks) plus nivolumab (240mg IV q2weeks) for patients with metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Primary endpoint is objective response rate as assessed by RECIST v1.1, including measurable cutaneous disease that can be followed by photography. Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, stable disease at six months, and toxicity. A two-stage design is used with six patients in the first stage and an additional ten patients in the second stage.ResultsAt data cutoff, 16 patients with angiosarcoma were enrolled. Median age was 68 years (25-81 years). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (0-5). 9 patients had cutaneous primary tumors of any cutaneous site, 7 had non-cutaneous primary tumors. ORR for all patients was 25% (4/16, table 1, figure 1). Subgroup analysis revealed that 60% (3/5) of patients with primary cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face had a confirmed objective response. 6-month PFS was 38%. 75% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE), and 25% experienced a grade 3-4 AE. 68.8% experienced an immune related AE (irAE), and 2 (12.5%) developed grade 3 or 4 irAEs. Grade 3-4 irAEs were ALT and AST increase and diarrhea. There were no grade 5 toxicities.ConclusionsThe combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab was well tolerated and had an ORR of 25% in angiosarcoma regardless of primary site, with 3 of 5 patients with cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face responding. Ipilimumab and nivolumab warrant further investigation in angiosarcoma.AcknowledgementsFunding: National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grant awards CA180888, CA180819, CA180868; and in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyTrial RegistrationNCT02834013Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the NCI CIRB.

scholarly journals Phase I/Phase II Study of Blinatumomab in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (36) ◽  
pp. 4381-4389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arend von Stackelberg ◽  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Rupert Handgretinger ◽  
Tanya M. Trippett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽  
Recommended Dosage ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Minimal Residual

Purpose Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct targeting CD19 on B-cell lymphoblasts. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, recommended dosage, and potential for efficacy of blinatumomab in children with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Methods This open-label study enrolled children < 18 years old with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL in a phase I dosage-escalation part and a phase II part, using 6-week treatment cycles. Primary end points were maximum-tolerated dosage (phase I) and complete remission rate within the first two cycles (phase II). Results We treated 49 patients in phase I and 44 patients in phase II. Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1 (phase I). Three experienced grade 4 cytokine-release syndrome (one attributed to grade 5 cardiac failure); one had fatal respiratory failure. The maximum-tolerated dosage was 15 µg/m2/d. Blinatumomab pharmacokinetics was linear across dosage levels and consistent among age groups. On the basis of the phase I data, the recommended blinatumomab dosage for children with relapsed/refractory ALL was 5 µg/m2/d for the first 7 days, followed by 15 µg/m2/d thereafter. Among the 70 patients who received the recommended dosage, 27 (39%; 95% CI, 27% to 51%) achieved complete remission within the first two cycles, 14 (52%) of whom achieved complete minimal residual disease response. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse events were anemia (36%), thrombocytopenia (21%), and hypokalemia (17%). Three patients (4%) and one patient (1%) had cytokine-release syndrome of grade 3 and 4, respectively. Two patients (3%) interrupted treatment after grade 2 seizures. Conclusion This trial, which to the best of our knowledge was the first such trial in pediatrics, demonstrated antileukemic activity of single-agent blinatumomab with complete minimal residual disease response in children with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL. Blinatumomab may represent an important new treatment option in this setting, requiring further investigation in curative indications.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of Cetuximab With or Without Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Tract Carcinoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3545-3551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ning Wong ◽  
Samuel Litwin ◽  
David Vaughn ◽  
Seth Cohen ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose The benefit of salvage chemotherapy is modest in metastatic urothelial cancer. We conducted a randomized, noncomparative phase II study to measure the efficacy of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in patients with previously treated urothelial cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who received one line of chemotherapy in the perioperative or metastatic setting were randomly assigned to 4-week cycles of cetuximab 250 mg/m2 with or without paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 per week. We used early progression as an indicator of futility. Either arm would close if seven of the initial 15 patients in that arm progressed at the first disease evaluation at 8 weeks. Results We enrolled 39 evaluable patients. The single-agent cetuximab arm closed after nine of the first 11 patients progressed by 8 weeks. The combination arm completed the full accrual of 28 patients, of whom 22 patients (78.5%) had visceral disease. Twelve of 28 patients had progression-free survival greater than 16 weeks. The overall response rate was 25% (95% CI, 11% to 45%; three complete responses and four partial responses). The median progression-free survival was 16.4 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 25.1 weeks), and the median overall survival was 42 weeks (95% CI, 30.4 to 78 weeks). Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events that occurred in at least two patients were rash (six cases), fatigue (five cases), and low magnesium (three cases). Conclusion Although it had limited activity as a single agent, cetuximab appears to augment the antitumor activity of paclitaxel in previously treated urothelial cancers. The cetuximab and paclitaxel combination merits additional study to establish its role in the treatment of urothelial cancers.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab and trabectedin in pretreated patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS): Preliminary results of a phase II trial of the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG-15, NitraSarc) for the non-L sarcoma cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11545-11545
Author(s):  
Daniel Pink ◽  
Dimosthenis Andreou ◽  
Anne Flörcken ◽  
Alexander Golf ◽  
Stephan Richter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Primary Efficacy Endpoint ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Group A ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group B

11545 Background: Single-agent PD-1 inhibitors have modest activity in the treatment of most STS. Potential strategies to increase efficacy include combination therapies targeting the tumor microenvironment. Considering that apart from direct growth inhibition and death of malignant cells, trabectedin (Tr) also induces macrophage depletion and/or different immunologic effects, suggesting a possible synergistic effect of combined Tr plus anti-PD-1 treatment. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined Tr and nivolumab (Ni) as a second-line treatment in STS. Methods: The prospective, explorative, two group, non-randomized phase II NiTraSarc trial enrolled pretreated patients (pt) with advanced STS (Group A: lipo- or leiomyosarcomas, Group B: non-L-sarcomas). Pt were initially treated with 3 cycles of Tr 1.5 mg/m2, followed by the combination of Tr 1.5 mg/m2 + Ni 240 mg (“late combination cohort” (LCC)) for up to 16 cycles. After positive results of a preplanned interim analysis, pt received the combination therapy starting with cycle 2 (“early combination cohort” (ECC)). 92 pt were recruited to the trial (55 in Group A, 37 in Group B). Primary efficacy endpoint is progression-free survival rate after 6 months (PFSR6) according to RECIST v.1.1. This is a first analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint in Group B based on a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population of evaluable 36 pt: 23 and 13 pt from the LCC and ECC, respectively. Results: The most common Group B subtypes comprised undifferentiated pleomorphic/not otherwise specified sarcoma (UPS/NOS, 13pt) and fibromyxoid sarcoma (FMS, 6pt). After a median follow-up of 5 months (m) PFSR6 was 13.9% for all pt, 8.7% in LCC and 23.1% in ECC. Median duration of disease stabilization (DoDS) was 4m in all pt, the LCC and the ECC. Two pt had a partial response (PR), 10 had disease stabilization (SD), while 13 pt progressed, and 11 had missing data. By subtype: PR- UPS/NOS=2 (DoDS 12.7m/12.5m). SD: UPS/NOS=3, epithelioid=2, synovial=2, FMS=1, fibrosarcoma=1, other=1. All 36 pt experienced at least one adverse event (AE) reaching a total of 579 AEs, 141 (24.4%) of which were considered to be grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs. The main grade ≥3 AEs were: leukopenia (47.2% of pt), neutropenia (41.7% of pt), thrombocytopenia (33.3% of pt), increased ALT (30.6% of pt), and anemia (27.8% of pt). Conclusions: Tr+Ni was well tolerated and showed activity in at least some patients with non-L-sarcomas (mostly UPS/NOS) especially in the ECC. Analyses of the collected data, including PD-L1 expression profile, with the goal to establish whether Tr+Ni should be further pursued in these patients, are ongoing. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03590210; EudraCT: 2017-001083-38. Clinical trial information: NCT03590210.

Association of statins and nivolumab activity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Results from the phase II nivoren—GETUG AFU 26 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 359-359
Author(s):  
Emeline Colomba ◽  
Ronan Flippot ◽  
Cécile Dalban ◽  
Sylvie Negrier ◽  
Christine Chevreau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Modulation ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Metabolic Reprogramming ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

359 Background: Statins are HMG-CoA inhibitors that regulate several mechanisms involved in tumor growth, including mitochondrial metabolism, activation of oncogenic signaling pathways, and immune modulation. Population-based studies showed that statin intake may be negatively associated with RCC onset. The impact of statins on response to immunotherapy in mRCC is unknown. Herein we study the association between statin administration and outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the NIVOREN-GETUG AFU 26 phase II trial (NCT03013335). Methods: Patients with mRCC who failed previous VEGFR inhibitors were included. We assessed nivolumab activity, including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) according to statin intake at baseline. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v4.0. Results: Overall,133 patients were treated with statins at baseline among 702 evaluable for concomitant therapies (19%). Among them, median age was 68 (49-90), 84% were male, 85% had a performance status ≥ 80%, 42% were overweight and 20% obese. Patients treated with statins had mostly good (23%) or intermediate (58%) IMDC risk, 64% had grade 3 or 4 tumors, and nivolumab was given in a third line setting or more in 55%. Median follow-up was 23.9 months (95%CI 23.0-24.5) in the overall cohort. The ORR was 26% in patients treated with statins, PFS 5.0 months (CI95% 3.0 – 5.5), OS 27.9 months (CI95% 19.4-30.3). Outcomes of patients with or without statins did not differ significantly. Similar rates of grade 3-5 TRAE were reported in patients with (20%) or without (18%) statin intake. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate statin intake and outcomes with nivolumab in patients with mRCC. Despite numerically higher ORR, statins were not significantly associated with improved outcomes. These data require other analyzes considering other factors such as BMI and other comorbidities. Further studies may help better understand the interplay between immunity and metabolic reprogramming in RCC.

Quadruplet regimen with capecitabine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab in chemo-naive patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the safety lead-in of QUATTRO-II study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
Hideaki Bando ◽  
Daisuke Kotani ◽  
Masahito Kotaka ◽  
Akihito Kawazoe ◽  
Toshiki Masuishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3

57 Background: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (BEV) is regarded as the standard of care for selected patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), despite the high incidence of neutropenia and diarrhea. The AXEPT phase III study showed that the modified capecitabine (CAP) + irinotecan (IRI) + BEV (CAPIRI+BEV) [CAP 1600 mg/m2, IRI 200 mg/m2, and BEV 7.5 mg/kg q3wk] treatment was non-inferior to FOLFIRI+BEV, with a lower incidence of hematologic toxicity. We hypothesized that the modified CAPIRI combined with oxaliplatin (OX) and BEV (CAPOXIRI+BEV) would be more feasible than FOLFOXIRI+BEV, without compromising efficacy. Methods: The QUATTRO-II study is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study. In Step 1, the recommended doses (RD) of OX and IRI were investigated as a safety lead-in. In Step 2, pts are randomized to either the RD of CAPOXIRI+BEV or FOLFOXIRI+BEV. In Step 1, four dose levels of CAPOXIRI (fixed dose of CAP 1600 mg/m2 and BEV 7.5 mg/kg plus escalated or de-escalated doses of OX and IRI, q3wk) were investigated in a 3+3 manner. A dose level of ≤ 2/6 of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) cases was expected as the RD. Results: A total of 9 pts (3 at Level 0, 6 at Level 1) were included in Step 1. The baseline characteristics were as follows: the median age was 62 years; 6 were male; 6 presented with a left-sided tumor; 8 had a performance status of 0; all wild type/ RAS mutant/ BRAF V600E mutant were 8/1/0; and UGT1A1 wild type/*6 single hetero/*28 single hetero were 7/0/2. In Level 0 (IRI 200 mg/m2, OX 100 mg/m2), one grade 4 neutropenia and one grade 3 anorexia were observed, but without DLT. In Level 1 (IRI 200 mg/m2, OX 130 mg/m2), two grade 4 neutropenia and one grade 3 colitis were observed, with 1 DLT (febrile neutropenia) case, fully recovered without G-CSF administration. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Although dose modifications were needed in 4 of the 6 pts, no further safety concerns related to treatment continuity were observed in the 2nd or subsequent cycles. Thus, we determined that the dose administered in Level 1 is the RD for Step 2. According to the preliminary efficacy results at 8 weeks after initiating study treatment, 6 pts achieved a partial response (2 in Level 0 and 4 in Level 1). Conclusions: The RD of CAPOXIRI+BEV was 200 mg/m2 IRI, 130 mg/m2 OX, 1600 mg/m2 CAP, and 7.5mg/kg BEV. The randomized phase II Step (Step 2) of QUATTRO-II is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04097444.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document