Adverse events and estimated costs with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic melanoma patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21529-e21529
Author(s):  
Bianca Gautron Moura ◽  
Camille Léa Gérard ◽  
Nathalie Testart ◽  
Marian Caikovsky ◽  
Alexandre M. Wicky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Medication Costs ◽  
Global Cost ◽  
Disease Costs ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Grade 3

e21529 Background: The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic melanoma patients increases response rates (RR) and survival outcomes. As checkpoint inhibitors bear a significant financial impact on the healthcare system, we performed a study that addresses the global costs of the treatment, focusing on immune-related adverse event (irAE) management costs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 62 metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab at the Oncology Department of Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) between June 1, 2016 and August 31, 2019. The frequency of irAEs, the duration, management, and outcomes were evaluated. All melanoma-specific costs were analyzed by mining the electronic healthcare record and billing data of the hospital. Results: The median follow-up was 32 months (range 20-1066 days). In our cohort, 54/62 (87%) patients presented at least one irAE, and 22/62 (35%) presented a grade 3 irAE. One patient died from an irAE (pneumonitis). The most common irAEs were diarrhea 23/62 (37%) any grade, 8/62 (13%) grade 3-4; hepatitis 22/62 (36%) any grade, 9/62 (15%) grade 3-4; and skin rash 21/62 (34%) any grade, 6/32 (10%) grade 3-4. The overall response rate was 29/62 (47%), with 15/62 (24%) of complete response (CR) and 14/62 (23%) of partial response (PR). The majority of patients who had a CR 13/15 (87%) and 20/28 (71%) of overall responders presented a grade 3-4 toxicity, and there were no responses in patients without toxicity. However, toxicity does not imply response, as only 29/54 (54%) of patients with toxicity (any grade) and 20/31 (65%) (grade 3-4) responded. The toxicity costs represent only 3% on average of the total expenses per patient. The most significant contributions were medication costs (44%) and disease costs (39%, mainly disease-related hospitalization costs). Patients with a CR had the lowest global cost per week (2,860 USD, converted from CHF) despite the associated toxicities and patients who had progressive disease, the highest one (9,999 USD). Except for the one patient who had a grade 5 toxicity (7,472 USD/week), we observe that less severe toxicity grades (11,603 USD/week for grade 1), or even the absence of toxicity (12,266 USD/week), are associated to higher median costs per week (against 4,039 USD/ week for grade 4 and 3,524 USD/week for grade 3). Conclusions: The cost of toxicities was unexpectedly small (only 3%) compared to the total costs, especially medication costs (44%). Also, patients with a higher degree of toxicity had lower costs and better outcomes.

Toxicity, response, and survival in older adults with metastatic melanoma treated with checkpoint inhibitors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9544-9544
Author(s):  
Nienke A De Glas ◽  
Esther Bastiaannet ◽  
Frederiek van den Bos ◽  
Simon Mooijaart ◽  
Astrid Aplonia Maria Van Der Veldt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Toxicity Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

9544 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors have strongly improved survival of patients with metastatic melanoma. Trials suggest no differences in outcomes between older and younger patients, but only relatively young patients with a good performance status were included in these trials. The aim of this study was to describe treatment patterns and outcomes of older adults with metastatic melanoma, and to identify predictors of outcome. Methods: We included all patients aged ≥65 years with metastatic melanoma between 2013 and 2020 from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment registry (DMTR), in which detailed information on patients, treatments and outcomes is available. We assessed predictors of grade ≥3 toxicity and 6-months response using logistic regression models, and melanoma-specific and overall survival using Cox regression models. Additionally, we described reasons for hospital admissions and treatment discontinuation. Results: A total of 2216 patients were included. Grade ≥3 toxicity did not increase with age, comorbidity or WHO performance status, in patients treated with monotherapy (anti-PD1 or ipilimumab) or combination treatment. However, patients aged ≥75 were admitted more frequently and discontinued treatment due to toxicity more often. Six months-response rates were similar to previous randomized trials (40.3% and 43.6% in patients aged 65-75 and ≥75 respectively for anti-PD1 treatment) and were not affected by age or comorbidity. Melanoma-specific survival was not affected by age or comorbidity, but age, comorbidity and WHO performance status were associated with overall survival in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Toxicity, response and melanoma-specific survival were not associated with age or comorbidity status. Treatment with immunotherapy should therefore not be omitted solely based on age or comorbidity. However, the impact of grade I-II toxicity in older patients deserves further study as older patients discontinue treatment more frequently and receive less treatment cycles.[Table: see text]

Aerosolized sargramostim for the treatment of metastatic melanoma to the lungs

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8565-8565
Author(s):  
S. N. Markovic ◽  
V. J. Suman ◽  
P. Schaefer ◽  
R. Morton ◽  
K. M. Rowland
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Specific Ctls ◽  
Dose Dependent Fashion ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Grade 3

8565 Background: Previous studies using low-dose (250 ug/dose) aerosolized sargramostim (granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor: aero-GM-CSF) for the treatment of metastatic melanoma, revealed anecdotal clinical responses that appeared to correlate with an increase in the number of tumor specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) in blood. Herein, we address whether or not further dose escalation of aero-GM-CSF is safe, results in greater increase of melanoma specific CTLs, and affects clinical outcomes. Methods: A 5+5 dose escalation clinical trial was conducted to determine the dose of aero-GM-CSF that would increase in the frequency of peripheral blood melanoma specific CTLs in HLA-A2+ patients with metastatic melanoma to the lungs. Aero-GM-CSF was administered twice daily on days 1–7 and 15–21 of a 28 day cycle at doses of: 500, 750, 1,000, 1,250, 1,500, 1,750, and 2,000 ug per cohort. If at most 2 of 5 patients at a dose level reported a 5-fold increase in CTLs, dose escalation occurred. If not, 5 additional patients were treated at that dose. Dose escalation continued until =2 of 5 patients at a dose level developed severe toxicity, at least 7 of the 10 patients at a dose level reported a 5-fold increase in CTLs, or all dose levels were exhausted. Results: The study accrued 40 patients from August 2002 to July 2006. Four patients cancelled participation prior to treatment. One patient was replaced (500 ug) as he died within 13 days of registration. Among the 35 remaining patients, median age was 58 (23–84), 72% were male, and 72% had a PS=0. Dose escalation was not terminated due to toxicity. Toxicities = grade 3 (at least probably treatment related) included: grade 3 fatigue (1) at 1,000 ug; and grade 3 cough (1), and grade 4 dyspnea (1) at 1,750 ug. At the 2,000 ug dose, most patients (4 of 5) exhibited a greater than 2-fold increase in melanoma specific CTLs. Two of these patients remain on treatment: one with partial response at 14.0 months and the other with stable disease at 6.5 months. A 5-fold increase in tumor specific CTLs was not achieved in any patient. Conclusions: Aero-GM-CSF therapy administered at up to 2,000 ug/dose appears safe and seems to correlate with increased frequencies of tumor specific CTLs in a dose-dependent fashion. Further dose escalation followed by clinical efficacy testing is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Bortezomib and interferon alpha-2b in metastatic melanoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20018-e20018
Author(s):  
Joseph Markowitz ◽  
Eric A Luedke ◽  
Valerie P Grignol ◽  
Erinn Hade ◽  
Bonnie K. Paul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Interferon Α ◽  
Motor Neuropathy ◽  
Weekly Cycle ◽  
Interferon Alpha 2B ◽  
Cytokine Analysis ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Grade 3

e20018 Background: Preclinical studies revealed that bortezomib and interferon-α (IFN-α ) induce synergistic apoptosis in human melanoma cells. Combined treatment with bortezomib and IFN-α led to significant survival increases in a melanoma murine model. A phase I study is presented to determine the safety, tolerability and dose-limiting toxicity of bortezomib when administered in combination with interferon-alpha-2b (IFN-α) to patients with metastatic melanoma. Methods: Metastatic melanoma patients with ECOG status ≤ 2 were treated on a 5 week cycle. IFN-α (5 MU/m2) was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) on days 1, 3, and 5 of week one. During weeks 2-4 bortezomib was administered intravenously on day 1 along with IFNEα (5 MU/m2 s.c.) on days 1, 3, and 5. There was no treatment during week 5. After the first cycle, bortezomib was administered intravenously on day 1 of the weekly cycle along with IFNEα on days 1, 3, and 5. Bortezomib does levels were 1.0, 1.3, or 1.6 mg/m2 to cohorts of three patients. Results: 16 patients (8 men, 8 women, median age 58.5 (34-82) years) were treated. The most common metastatic disease sites included the lung, subcutaneous nodules, lymph nodes, and soft tissue. Other sites included: brain, skin, viscera, and bone. Grade 3 toxicities most frequently included fatigue, vomiting, and diarrhea. Syncope, depression, hypokalemia, motor neuropathy, and dyspnea were also observed. Grade 4 toxicities included fatigue and lymphopenia. There were 1 PR, 7 SD, and 8 PD. Median PFS and OS were 2.5 months (95% CI: 1.4-3.7) and 10.3 months (95% CI: 5.5-12.8), respectively. Bortezomib did not limit the ability of IFN-α to induce STAT1 phosphorylation in PBMCs. Levels of proEangiogenic cytokines (VEGF and IL-8) were higher in melanoma patients than in normal controls. Levels of VEGF, IL-8 and IL-6 all decreased during week 2 in the patient who experienced a PR. Bioplex cytokine analysis revealed decreases in IL-8 and VEGF in melanoma patients. Conclusions: Bortezomib and IFN-α represents a novel immune based treatment for melanoma. This combination reduces levels of pro-angiogenic factors in melanoma patients, is generally well tolerated, and can be safely administered to melanoma patients including those patients with treated CNS metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT01462773.

Anti-PD-1 tolerance after severe toxicity with ipilimumab therapy in metastatic melanoma patients.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9551-9551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelique Brunot ◽  
Geraldine Jeudy ◽  
Mathieu Tas ◽  
Bernard Guillot ◽  
Nora Kramkimel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Melanoma Patients

A dose escalation phase 1 study of radiotherapy (RT) in combination with anti-cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody ipilimumab in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9549-9549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celine Boutros ◽  
Christine Mateus ◽  
Emilie Lanoy ◽  
Emilie Routier ◽  
Salem Chouaib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Grade 3

9549 Background: Preclinical findings have shown a synergy between RT and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody in several tumor animal models for both local tumor control and distant effects. Preliminary clinical data suggest that it could be due to an abscopal effect of RT. The Mel-Ipi-Rx phase 1 study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of RT combined with ipilimumab in pts with metastatic melanoma. Methods: A 3+3 dose escalation design was used with 9, 15, 18 and 24 Gy dose of RT (in 3 fractions) at week 4 combined with 10 mg/kg ipilimumab (every 3 weeks for 4 doses). Pts with evidence of clinical benefit at week 12 were eligible for maintenance ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg every 12 weeks starting at week 24 until severe toxicity or disease progression based on immune-related response criteria (irRC). Results: 19 pts with advanced melanoma received ipilimumab between August 2011 and July 2015. Nine pts received the 4 doses of ipilimumab and 2 pts received maintenance ipilimumab (1 and 2 cycles respectively). All pts received the combined RT at week 4 in 3 fractions. All pts presented at least one AE of any grade. The most common AEs were asthenia, diarrhea, desease-related pain and fever. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 8 pts. They included colitis (n = 3), hepatitis (n = 2), anemia (n = 2), asthenia (n = 1), thyroid disorders (n = 1) and nausea/vomiting (n = 1). Nine pts discontinued the study owing to treatment-related adverse events including colitis (n = 6), hepatitis (n = 2) and DRESS (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and systemic syndrome) (n = 1). DLT occurred in 2/6 pts in the cohort receiving 15 Gy. No drug-related death occurred. According to irRC, 4 partial responses (ORR: 21%) and 4 stable diseases were observed at week 24. The MTD was 9 Gy dose. One pt out of 12 treated in the 9 Gy cohort presented a DLT (grade 3 colitis). The median progression-free survival [95% CI] was 7.2 months [2.4 – 16.8]. The median overall survival [95% CI] was 14.4 months [7.2 – 20.4]. Conclusions: When combined with ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg, in the present design, the MTD of RT was 9 Gy. This combination appears to be associated with antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: 2010-020317-93.

Prognostic relevance of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) before anti-PD1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21045-e21045
Author(s):  
Daniel Vilarim Araujo ◽  
Rafael Vanin de Moraes ◽  
Victor Aurelio Ramos Sousa ◽  
Mauro Daniel Spina Donadio ◽  
Aline Fusco Fares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Melanoma Patients

e21045 Background: Biomarkers to select the patients most likely to benefit from checkpoint inhibitors are urged. NLR is a simple way of measuring systemic inflammation and is an independent predictor of survival before Anti-CTLA4 therapy. We hypothesized if NLR is also a predictor of survival before Anti-PD1 therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of all consecutive metastatic melanoma patients who received Nivolumab treatment from January/2014 – February/2017, including 53 patients prospectively collected from an Expanded Access Program. Of 86 patients, 83 patients were included for demographic and efficacy analysis, and 74 had information about baseline pre-treatment NLR. We analyzed NLR as a continuous variable and categorised ≥ 5 vs. < 5. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Long-rank test compared categories and Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic significance of baseline NLR in univariate and multivariable analysis. Results: Median PFS for the entire population was 6,407 months (3,28 – 9,52) and median OS was not reached (NR) with a median FU of 10,74 months. The median NLR ratio was 3,11 (0,87 – 19). 18 patients (24,3%) had a ≥ 5 NLR vs. 56 (75,7%) < 5. Median PFS for NLR ≥ 5 was: 2,3 (1,75 – 2,84) vs. 12,02 (5,11 – 18,93) for < 5 (HR = 3,11; IC95% 1,52 – 6,27; p = 0,001). Median OS ≥ 5: 3,05 (2,06 – 4,04) vs. NR for < 5 (HR = 5,88; IC95% 2,60 – 13,29; p = 0,001). NLR categorised remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis for PFS and NLR as a continuous variable remained statistically significant for both PFS and OS in multivariate analysis (Table 1). Conclusions: Baseline NLR is a rapid, simple, and cost-free predictor of survival before Anti-PD1 therapy. These results should be validated in a larger cohort of patients. [Table: see text]

Serum 5-s-cysteinyldopa for identifying non-responders to nivolumab treatment of melanoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21068-e21068
Author(s):  
Toshikazu Omodaka ◽  
Akane Minagawa ◽  
Hisashi Uhara ◽  
Kazumasa Wakamatsu ◽  
Tomonobu Koizumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Normal Range ◽  
Treatment Progress ◽  
Maximum Change ◽  
Imaging Examination ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Monitor Treatment Response ◽  
Sensitive Marker

e21068 Background: Despite considerable advances in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, reliable markers to monitor treatment response are still lacking. 5-S-cysteinyldopa (5-S-CD) is a precursor of melanin that has been established as a biomarker for melanoma progression. This study evaluated serum 5-S-CD in parallel with lactate dehydrogenase (LD) as a predictor of treatment progress in melanoma patients receiving Nivolumab (Nivo) therapy. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients (median age: 77 years; 10 male and 11 female) with metastatic melanoma who were treated with Nivo at Shinshu University Hospital between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively examined. Primary lesions were in the head and neck in 5 patients, trunk and extremities in 5 patients, acral area in 5 patients, mucosa in 3 patients, and an unknown site in 3 patients. Serum 5-S-CD and LD were recorded and change ratios were calculated between the baseline and values obtained 14-90 days after the initial administration of Nivo, prior to the first imaging examination. The change ratios of each biomarker were evaluated based on the response classifications defined by the RECIST criteria (version 1.1). Results: The respective baseline median concentrations of serum 5-S-CD (normal range: 2.5–6.1 nmol/L) and LD (normal range: 120–230 IU/L) were 26.5 nmol/L and 247 IU/L in partial response (PR) patients (n = 5), 74.2 nmol/L and 428 IU/L in a stable disease (SD) patient (n = 1), and 9.9 nmol/L and 237 IU/L in progressive disease (PD) patients (n = 15). The maximum change ratios of 5-S-CD before the first imaging examination were 0.13–1.14 (median: 0.34) in PR patients and 0.30–15.38 (1.52) in PD patients, as compared with 0.73–0.98 (0.96) in PR patients and 0.63–2.23 (1.04) in PD patients for LD. The maximum change ratios of 5-S-CD were ≥1.3 in 9 of 15 (60%) PD patients but < 1.3 in all (100%) PR and SD patients. Conclusions: The maximum change ratio of serum 5-S-CD in the early phase of Nivo treatment may be a useful and more sensitive marker than that of LD to predict a non-response in metastatic melanoma.

scholarly journals Clinical Categorization Algorithm (CLICAL) and Machine Learning Approach (SRF-CLICAL) to Predict Clinical Benefit to Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma Patients: Real-World Evidence from the Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 4164
Author(s):  
Gabriele Madonna ◽  
Giuseppe V. Masucci ◽  
Mariaelena Capone ◽  
Domenico Mallardo ◽  
Antonio Maria Grimaldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Learning Algorithm ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Melanoma Patients

The real-life application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may yield different outcomes compared to the benefit presented in clinical trials. For this reason, there is a need to define the group of patients that may benefit from treatment. We retrospectively investigated 578 metastatic melanoma patients treated with ICIs at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione “G. Pascale” of Napoli, Italy (INT-NA). To compare patients’ clinical variables (i.e., age, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), eosinophil, BRAF status, previous treatment) and their predictive and prognostic power in a comprehensive, non-hierarchical manner, a clinical categorization algorithm (CLICAL) was defined and validated by the application of a machine learning algorithm—survival random forest (SRF-CLICAL). The comprehensive analysis of the clinical parameters by log risk-based algorithms resulted in predictive signatures that could identify groups of patients with great benefit or not, regardless of the ICI received. From a real-life retrospective analysis of metastatic melanoma patients, we generated and validated an algorithm based on machine learning that could assist with the clinical decision of whether or not to apply ICI therapy by defining five signatures of predictability with 95% accuracy.

scholarly journals Treatment of Advanced Metastatic Melanoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 2021164S
Author(s):  
Pietro Quaglino ◽  
Paolo Fava ◽  
Luca Tonella ◽  
Marco Rubatto ◽  
Simone Ribero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Melanoma Patients

The introduction in clinical practice of new drug compounds both targeted therapies anti-BRAF and checkpoint inhibitors have largely improved our potential to manage advanced metastatic melanoma patients. This has led to a significant improvement in terms of response rates and particularly in the overall survival (OS). The long-term results of trials with follow-up data of patients treated with targeted or immunotherapies reported median OS rates around 24 months, with 5-year survival rates around 35-40%. As to the drugs currently available and reimbursed by the Italian National Health System, 3 combinations of anti-BRAF/anti-MEK inhibitors are available (dabrafenib/trametinib, vemurafenib/cobimetinib and the most recently introduced encorafenib/binimetinib). As for checkpoint inhibitors, first line immunotherapy is represented by anti-PD1 blockers (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), whilst the anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab can be used as second line immunotherapy. The decision-making factors that define the best treatment approach in stage IV patients with metastatic melanoma include the mutation pattern, performance status, high/low tumor load, brain metastases, progression pattern (low/fast), and availability of clinical trials. This review will analyze the current therapeutic tools adopted for the treatment of metastatic melanoma patients. It will then focus on the latest results obtained by novel treatments (checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies) which can be used in the clinical daily practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document