scholarly journals Central Control of Body Weight and Appetite

2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (11_supplement_1) ◽  
pp. s37-s50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Woods ◽  
David A. D'Alessio
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Energy Homeostasis ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Meal Size ◽  
Reduce Food Intake ◽  
Therapeutic Goals ◽  
Therapeutic Implications ◽  
Adiposity Signals

ABSTRACT Context Energy balance is critical for survival and health, and control of food intake is an integral part of this process. This report reviews hormonal signals that influence food intake and their clinical applications. Evidence Acquisition A relatively novel insight is that satiation signals that control meal size and adiposity signals that signify the amount of body fat are distinct and interact in the hypothalamus and elsewhere to control energy homeostasis. This review focuses upon recent literature addressing the integration of satiation and adiposity signals and therapeutic implications for treatment of obesity. Evidence Synthesis During meals, signals such as cholecystokinin arise primarily from the GI tract to cause satiation and meal termination; signals secreted in proportion to body fat such as insulin and leptin interact with satiation signals and provide effective regulation by dictating meal size to amounts that are appropriate for body fatness, or stored energy. Although satiation and adiposity signals are myriad and redundant and reduce food intake, there are few known orexigenic signals; thus, initiation of meals is not subject to the degree of homeostatic regulation that cessation of eating is. There are now drugs available that act through receptors for satiation factors and which cause weight loss, demonstrating that this system is amenable to manipulation for therapeutic goals. Conclusions Although progress on effective medical therapies for obesity has been relatively slow in coming, advances in understanding the central regulation of food intake may ultimately be turned into useful treatment options.

Gastrointestinal Satiety Signals I. An overview of gastrointestinal signals that influence food intake

2004 ◽  
Vol 286 (1) ◽  
pp. G7-G13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Woods
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Social Situation ◽  
Meal Size ◽  
Gi Tract ◽  
The Social ◽  
Adiposity Signals ◽  
The Central Nervous System

An overview is presented of those signals generated by the gastrointestinal (GI) tract during meals that interact with the central nervous system to create a sensation of fullness and satiety. Although dozens of enzymes, hormones, and other factors are secreted by the GI tract in response to food in the lumen, only a handful are able to influence food intake directly. Most of these cause meals to terminate and hence are called satiety signals, with CCK being the most investigated. Only one GI signal, ghrelin, that increases meal size has been identified. The administration of exogenous CCK or other satiety signals causes smaller meals to be consumed, whereas blocking the action of endogenous CCK or other satiety signals causes larger meals to be consumed. Satiety signals are relayed to the hindbrain, either indirectly via nerves such as the vagus from the GI tract or else directly via the blood. Most factors that influence how much food is eaten during individual meals act by changing the sensitivity to satiety signals. This includes adiposity signals as well as habits and learning, the social situation, and stressors.

Infusion of CCK-8 into hepatic-portal vein fails to reduce food intake in rats

1987 ◽  
Vol 252 (5) ◽  
pp. R1015-R1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Greenberg ◽  
G. P. Smith ◽  
J. Gibbs
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Test Meal ◽  
Intraperitoneal Administration ◽  
Meal Size ◽  
Reduce Food Intake ◽  
Hormonal Mechanism ◽  
Hepatic Portal Vein ◽  
Hepatic Portal ◽  
Intraportal Infusion

If the putative satiating effect of endogenous cholecystokinin (CCK) is produced through a circulating hormonal mechanism, then administration of exogenous CCK into the hepatic-portal vein should decrease meal size. To test this, one form of endogenous CCK, the C-terminal octapeptide CCK-8, was infused intraportally in doses of 4 and 8 micrograms/kg just prior to a test meal. Neither dose decreased food intake after intraportal infusion even though intraperitoneal administration of 4 micrograms/kg CCK-8 decreased meal size approximately 50% in the same rats. The results suggest that if endogenous CCK-8 has a satiating effect, it acts primarily through a paracrine mechanism.

scholarly journals Inconsistencies in the assessment of food intake

2012 ◽  
Vol 303 (12) ◽  
pp. E1408-E1418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Woods ◽  
Wolfgang Langhans
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Energy Homeostasis ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Direct Proportion ◽  
Heated Debate ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Reducing Energy

Many peptides and other compounds that influence metabolism also influence food intake, and numerous hypotheses explaining the observed effects in terms of energy homeostasis have been suggested over the years. For example, cholecystokinin (CCK), a duodenal peptide secreted during meals that aids in digestion, also reduces ongoing food intake, thereby contributing to satiation; and insulin and leptin, hormones secreted in direct proportion to body fat, act in the brain to help control adiposity by reducing energy intake. These behavioral actions are often considered to be hard-wired, such that negative experiments, in which an administered compound fails to have its purported effect, are generally disregarded. In point of fact, failures to replicate the effects of compounds on food intake are commonplace, and this occurs both between and within laboratories. Failures to replicate have historically fueled heated debate about the efficacy and/or normal function of one or another compound, leading to confusion and ambiguity in the literature. We review these phenomena and their implications and argue that, rather than eliciting hard-wired behavioral responses in the maintenance of homeostasis, compounds that alter food intake are subjected to numerous influences that can render them completely ineffective at times and that a major reason for this variance is that food intake is not under stringent homeostatic control.

scholarly journals Pancreatic signals controlling food intake; insulin, glucagon and amylin

2006 ◽  
Vol 361 (1471) ◽  
pp. 1219-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C Woods ◽  
Thomas A Lutz ◽  
Nori Geary ◽  
Wolfgang Langhans
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Energy Homeostasis ◽  
Endocrine Pancreas ◽  
Situational Factors ◽  
Meal Size ◽  
Vagus Nerves ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Short Term ◽  
The Brain

The control of food intake and body weight by the brain relies upon the detection and integration of signals reflecting energy stores and fluxes, and their interaction with many different inputs related to food palatability and gastrointestinal handling as well as social, emotional, circadian, habitual and other situational factors. This review focuses upon the role of hormones secreted by the endocrine pancreas: hormones, which individually and collectively influence food intake, with an emphasis upon insulin, glucagon and amylin. Insulin and amylin are co-secreted by B-cells and provide a signal that reflects both circulating energy in the form of glucose and stored energy in the form of visceral adipose tissue. Insulin acts directly at the liver to suppress the synthesis and secretion of glucose, and some plasma insulin is transported into the brain and especially the mediobasal hypothalamus where it elicits a net catabolic response, particularly reduced food intake and loss of body weight. Amylin reduces meal size by stimulating neurons in the hindbrain, and there is evidence that amylin additionally functions as an adiposity signal controlling body weight as well as meal size. Glucagon is secreted from A-cells and increases glucose secretion from the liver. Glucagon acts in the liver to reduce meal size, the signal being relayed to the brain via the vagus nerves. To summarize, hormones of the endocrine pancreas are collectively at the crossroads of many aspects of energy homeostasis. Glucagon and amylin act in the short term to reduce meal size, and insulin sensitizes the brain to short-term meal-generated satiety signals; and insulin and perhaps amylin as well act over longer intervals to modulate the amount of fat maintained and defended by the brain. Hormones of the endocrine pancreas interact with receptors at many points along the gut–brain axis, from the liver to the sensory vagus nerve to the hindbrain to the hypothalamus; and their signals are conveyed both neurally and humorally. Finally, their actions include gastrointestinal and metabolic as well as behavioural effects.

scholarly journals Peripheral administration of the N-terminal pro-opiomelanocortin fragment 1–28 to Pomc−/− mice reduces food intake and weight but does not affect adrenal growth or corticosterone production

2006 ◽  
Vol 190 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony P Coll ◽  
Martin Fassnacht ◽  
Steffen Klammer ◽  
Stephanie Hahner ◽  
Dominik M Schulte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Energy Homeostasis ◽  
Reduce Food Intake ◽  
Appetite Control ◽  
Concurrent Administration ◽  
Physiological Level ◽  
Sham Treatment ◽  
Acth Treatment

Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) is a polypeptide precursor that undergoes extensive processing to yield a range of peptides with biologically diverse functions. POMC-derived ACTH is vital for normal adrenal function and the melanocortin α-MSH plays a key role in appetite control and energy homeostasis. However, the roles of peptide fragments derived from the highly conserved N-terminal region of POMC are less well characterized. We have used mice with a null mutation in the Pomc gene (Pomc−/−) to determine the in vivo effects of synthetic N-terminal 1–28 POMC, which has been shown previously to possess adrenal mitogenic activity. 1–28 POMC (20 μg) given s.c. for 10 days had no effect on the adrenal cortex of Pomc−/− mice, with resultant cortical morphology and plasma corticosterone levels being indistinguishable from sham treatment. Concurrent administration of 1–28 POMC and 1–24 ACTH (30 μg/day) resulted in changes identical to 1–24 ACTH treatment alone, which consisted of upregulation of steroidogenic enzymes, elevation of corticosterone levels, hypertrophy of the zona fasciculate, and regression of the X-zone. However, treatment of corticosterone-depleted Pomc−/− mice with 1–28 POMC reduced cumulative food intake and total body weight. These anorexigenic effects were ameliorated when the peptide was administered to Pomc−/− mice with circulating corticosterone restored either to a low physiological level by corticosterone-supplemented drinking water (CORT) or to a supraphysiological level by concurrent 1–24 ACTH administration. Further, i.c.v. administration of 1–28 POMC to CORT-treated Pomc−/− mice had no effect on food intake or body weight. In wild-type mice, the effects of 1–28 POMC upon food intake and body weight were identical to sham treatment, but 1–28 POMC was able to ameliorate the hyperphagia induced by concurrent 1–24 ACTH treatment. In a mouse model which lacks all endogenous POMC peptides, s.c. treatment with synthetic 1–28 POMC alone can reduce food intake and body weight, but has no impact upon adrenal growth or steroidogenesis.

scholarly journals Central and peripheral control of food intake

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. I. Abdalla
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
The Body ◽  
Therapeutic Implications ◽  
New Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Control Food ◽  
Adiposity Signals ◽  
Control Food Intake

Abstract The maintenance of the body weight at a stable level is a major determinant in keeping the higher animals and mammals survive. Th e body weight depends on the balance between the energy intake and energy expenditure. Increased food intake over the energy expenditure of prolonged time period results in an obesity. Th e obesity has become an important worldwide health problem, even at low levels. The obesity has an evil effect on the health and is associated with a shorter life expectancy. A complex of central and peripheral physiological signals is involved in the control of the food intake. Centrally, the food intake is controlled by the hypothalamus, the brainstem, and endocannabinoids and peripherally by the satiety and adiposity signals. Comprehension of the signals that control food intake and energy balance may open a new therapeutic approaches directed against the obesity and its associated complications, as is the insulin resistance and others. In conclusion, the present review summarizes the current knowledge about the complex system of the peripheral and central regulatory mechanisms of food intake and their potential therapeutic implications in the treatment of obesity.

scholarly journals Obesity and Appetite Control

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Suzuki ◽  
Channa N. Jayasena ◽  
Stephen R. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Energy Homeostasis ◽  
Peptide Yy ◽  
Gut Hormones ◽  
Appetite Control ◽  
Control Food ◽  
Adiposity Signals ◽  
Term Energy ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1 ◽  
Control Food Intake

Obesity is one of the major challenges to human health worldwide; however, there are currently no effective pharmacological interventions for obesity. Recent studies have improved our understanding of energy homeostasis by identifying sophisticated neurohumoral networks which convey signals between the brain and gut in order to control food intake. The hypothalamus is a key region which possesses reciprocal connections between the higher cortical centres such as reward-related limbic pathways, and the brainstem. Furthermore, the hypothalamus integrates a number of peripheral signals which modulate food intake and energy expenditure. Gut hormones, such as peptide YY, pancreatic polypeptide, glucagon-like peptide-1, oxyntomodulin, and ghrelin, are modulated by acute food ingestion. In contrast, adiposity signals such as leptin and insulin are implicated in both short- and long-term energy homeostasis. In this paper, we focus on the role of gut hormones and their related neuronal networks (the gut-brain axis) in appetite control, and their potentials as novel therapies for obesity.

The GLP-1 agonist exendin-4 reduces food intake in nonhuman primates through changes in meal size

2007 ◽  
Vol 293 (3) ◽  
pp. R983-R987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Scott ◽  
Timothy H. Moran
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Rhesus Macaques ◽  
Specific Effect ◽  
Meal Size ◽  
Reduce Food Intake ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Primate Model ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1 ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Dose Dependent

Exendin-4 (Ex4), a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, has been shown to reduce food intake and suppress gastric emptying in rodents and humans. In this study we investigated the effects of peripheral administration of Ex4 on food intake and meal patterns in adult male rhesus macaques. Rhesus macaques ( n = 4) that had been trained to lever press for food pellets were injected intramuscularly 15 min before the start of their 6-h daily feeding period. Ex4 was given at doses of 0.10, 0.32, 0.56, 1.0, and 3.0 μg/kg. Ex4 suppressed food intake in a dose-dependent manner, with the 3.0 μg/kg dose completely preventing feeding during the 6-h period and the 0.10 μg/kg dose suppressing intake by 17%. Doses of 0.32, 0.56, 1.0, and 3.0 μg/kg caused significant reductions in cumulative intake at all six hourly time points. Ex4 inhibited food intake through a specific effect on meal size. Meal size was significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner with significant reductions at the 0.32 and 1.0 μg/kg doses ( P < 0.05). Day 2 and 3intakes returned to baseline levels with no compensation for Ex4-induced feeding suppression. Administration of doses of 0.32 and 0.56 μg/kg Ex4 over 5 consecutive days led to sustained reductions in intake with no evidence of compensation. Again, these reductions were due to specific effects on meal size. These results demonstrate that activation of GLP-1 pathways has potent effects on the controls of meal size and overall food intake in a nonhuman primate model.

Gastric emptying changes are neither necessary nor sufficient for CCK-induced satiety

1989 ◽  
Vol 256 (1) ◽  
pp. R56-R62
Author(s):  
K. L. Conover ◽  
S. M. Collins ◽  
H. P. Weingarten
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Emptying ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Significant Role ◽  
Test Meal ◽  
Meal Size ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Reduce Food Intake ◽  
Cholecystokinin Octapeptide ◽  
No Inhibition

If gastric emptying plays a significant role in the satiety produced by exogenous cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) then 1) the effects on emptying and feeding should share similar kinetics and 2) peptides that inhibit emptying should also inhibit feeding. In the first experiment, CCK-8 (5.6 micrograms/kg) injected immediately before the introduction of an intragastric load (10 ml saline) or presentation of a test meal (15% sucrose) produced a rapid inhibition of both emptying and feeding. In contrast, the same dose administered 15 min before testing caused no inhibition of emptying, even though it retained the ability to reduce meal size. In experiment 2, the abilities of the peptides pentagastrin (100 micrograms/kg), bombesin (8 and 16 micrograms/kg), and secretin (2.86, 14.3, and 28.6 micrograms/kg) to reduce food intake and inhibit emptying were tested. Pentagastrin influenced neither food intake nor gastric emptying. Bombesin caused a small transient delay in emptying but a large and sustained eating suppression. However, a high dose of secretin caused no significant reduction of food intake, in spite of the fact that it inhibited emptying to the same degree as 1.4 micrograms/kg CCK-8, which does reduce intake. These results suggest that the inhibition of emptying by CCK is not sufficient to explain the satiety effect of CCK-8.

scholarly journals STAT5 ablation in AgRP neurons increases female adiposity and blunts food restriction adaptations

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isadora C Furigo ◽  
Pryscila D S Teixeira ◽  
Paula G F Quaresma ◽  
Naira S Mansano ◽  
Renata Frazão ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Glucose Homeostasis ◽  
Knockout Mice ◽  
Food Restriction ◽  
Energy Homeostasis ◽  
Metabolic Effects ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Female Mice

AgRP neurons are important players in the control of energy homeostasis and are responsive to several hormones. In addition, STAT5 signalling in the brain, which is activated by metabolic hormones and growth factors, modulates food intake, body fat and glucose homeostasis. Given that, and the absence of studies that describe STAT5 function in AgRP cells, the present study investigated the metabolic effects of Stat5a/b gene ablation in these neurons. We observed that STAT5 signalling in AgRP neurons regulates body fat in female mice. However, male and female STAT5-knockout mice did not exhibit altered food intake, energy expenditure or glucose homeostasis compared to control mice. The counter-regulatory response or glucoprivic hyperphagia induced by 2-deoxy-d-glucose treatment were also not affected by AgRP-specific STAT5 ablation. However, under 60% food restriction, AgRP STAT5-knockout mice had a blunted upregulation of hypothalamic Agrp mRNA expression and corticosterone serum levels compared to control mice, suggesting a possible role for STAT5 in AgRP neurons for neuroendocrine adaptations to food restriction. Interestingly, ad libitum fed knockout male mice had reduced Pomc and Ucp-1 mRNA expression compared to control group. Taken together, these results suggest that STAT5 signalling in AgRP neurons regulates body adiposity in female mice, as well as some neuroendocrine adaptations to food restriction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document