scholarly journals Bariatric Surgery: Risks and Rewards

2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (11_supplement_1) ◽  
pp. s89-s96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter J. Pories
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Severe Obesity ◽  
Pseudotumor Cerebri ◽  
The United States ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Centers Of Excellence ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Severely Obese

ABSTRACT Context Over 23 million Americans are afflicted with severe obesity, i.e. their body mass index (in kilograms per square meter) values exceed 35. Of even greater concern is the association of the adiposity with comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiopulmonary failure, asthma, pseudotumor cerebri, infertility, and crippling arthritis. Objective: Diets, exercise, behavioral modification, and drugs are not effective in these individuals. This article examines the effect of surgery on the control of the weight and the comorbidities, as well as the safety of these operations. Interventions: Although the article focuses on the outcomes of the three most commonly performed operations, i.e. adjustable gastric banding, the gastric bypass, and the biliopancreatic bypass with duodenal switch, it aims for perspective with the inclusion of abandoned and current investigational procedures, a review of the complications, and an emphasis on the appropriate selection of patients. Positions: Ample evidence, including controlled randomized studies, now document that bariatric surgery produces durable weight loss exceeding 100 lb (46 kg), full and long-term remission of type 2 diabetes in over 80% with salutary effects on the other comorbidities as well with significant reductions in all-cause mortality. Although the severely obese present with serious surgical risks, bariatric surgery is performed safely with a 0.35% 90-d mortality in Centers of Excellence throughout the United States—similar to the complication rates after cholecystectomy. Conclusions Until better approaches become available, bariatric surgery is the therapy of choice for patients with severe obesity.

scholarly journals Utilising a milk-based meal replacement programme in a bariatric patient with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Maher ◽  
Mohammed Faraz Rafey ◽  
Helena Griffin ◽  
Katie Cunningham ◽  
Francis M Finucane
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Severe Obesity ◽  
Meal Replacement ◽  
Agonist Therapy ◽  
Severely Obese ◽  
Skimmed Milk

Summary A 45-year-old man with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2DM) (HbA1c 87 mmol/mol) despite 100 units of insulin per day and severe obesity (BMI 40.2 kg/m2) was referred for bariatric intervention. He declined bariatric surgery or GLP1 agonist therapy. Initially, his glycaemic control improved with dietary modification and better adherence to insulin therapy, but he gained weight. We started a low-energy liquid diet, with 2.2 L of semi-skimmed milk (equivalent to 1012 kcal) per day for 8 weeks (along with micronutrient, salt and fibre supplementation) followed by 16 weeks of phased reintroduction of a normal diet. His insulin was stopped within a week of starting this programme, and over 6 months, he lost 20.6 kg and his HbA1c normalised. However, 1 year later, despite further weight loss, his HbA1c deteriorated dramatically, requiring introduction of linagliptin and canagliflozin, with good response. Five years after initial presentation, his BMI remains elevated but improved at 35.5 kg/m2 and his glycaemic control is excellent with a HbA1c of 50 mmol/mol and he is off insulin therapy. Whether semi-skimmed milk is a safe, effective substrate for carefully selected patients with severe obesity complicated by T2DM remains to be determined. Such patients would need frequent monitoring by an experienced multidisciplinary team. Learning points: Meal replacement programmes are an emerging therapeutic strategy to allow severely obese type 2 diabetes patients to achieve clinically impactful weight loss. Using semi-skimmed milk as a meal replacement substrate might be less costly than commercially available programmes, but is likely to require intensive multidisciplinary bariatric clinical follow-up. For severely obese adults with poor diabetes control who decline bariatric surgery or GLP1 agonist therapy, a milk-based meal replacement programme may be an option. Milk-based meal replacement in patients with insulin requiring type 2 diabetes causes rapid and profound reductions in insulin requirements, so rigorous monitoring of glucose levels by patients and their clinicians is necessary. In carefully selected and adequately monitored patients, the response to oral antidiabetic medications may help to differentiate between absolute and relative insulin deficiency.

Current Opinions and Practices of Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents: A Survey among Pediatric Surgeons

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (01) ◽  
pp. 117-121
Author(s):  
Yvonne G. M. Roebroek ◽  
Suzanne R. Pruijssers ◽  
Nicole D. Bouvy ◽  
Ernest L. W. E. van Heurn
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Health Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Bariatric Surgeon ◽  
Obese Adolescents ◽  
Severely Obese

Abstract Introduction Bariatric surgery is performed at increasing rate in severely obese adolescents who do not respond to conservative treatment. In the United States, this treatment is generally accepted, yet in Europe, surgeons are more reluctant because of concerns regarding safety and (long-term) efficacy. We evaluated in which (European) countries bariatric surgery is allowed and performed, and the opinion of the members of the European Paediatric Surgeons' Association (EUPSA) regarding bariatric surgery in adolescents. Materials and Methods Information was obtained with an online questionnaire sent to all EUPSA members. Results A total of 108 pediatric surgeons (PSs) from 33 countries (of which 25 European) completed the survey. Sixty-two PSs (57.4%) from 22 countries stated that bariatric surgery in adolescents was allowed in their country. In only 14 countries, the costs were (partially) covered by health care insurances. Overall, 65.7% of the surgeons (n = 71) believed bariatric surgery may offer a valuable contribution to obtain substantial long-term weight loss in severely obese adolescents. Fifty-one (47.2%) reported that these procedures should be performed by a combination of a bariatric and a PS, while 20 (18.5%) and 16 (14.8%) preferred that these procedures should be performed solely by a PS or bariatric surgeon, respectively. Conclusion Although allowed in most European countries, bariatric surgery in adolescents is only practiced on a small scale, and the treatment is often excluded from regular health care reimbursement. The majority of PSs acknowledge the value of bariatric surgery, which should be performed by a combination of PS and bariatric surgeon.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes of macrovascular diseases and metabolic indicators of bariatric surgery for severe obesity type 2 diabetes patients with a meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. e0224828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoli Yan ◽  
Jinjin Wang ◽  
Jianfeng Zhang ◽  
Kaiping Gao ◽  
Qianqian Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Severe Obesity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Diabetes Patients

scholarly journals Major microbiota dysbiosis in severe obesity: fate after bariatric surgery

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Aron-Wisnewsky ◽  
Edi Prifti ◽  
Eugeni Belda ◽  
Farid Ichou ◽  
Brandon D Kayser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Severe Obesity ◽  
Shotgun Metagenomics ◽  
Host Interactions ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Severely Obese ◽  
Obese Subjects ◽  
Gene Richness

ObjectivesDecreased gut microbial gene richness (MGR) and compositional changes are associated with adverse metabolism in overweight or moderate obesity, but lack characterisation in severe obesity. Bariatric surgery (BS) improves metabolism and inflammation in severe obesity and is associated with gut microbiota modifications. Here, we characterised severe obesity-associated dysbiosis (ie, MGR, microbiota composition and functional characteristics) and assessed whether BS would rescue these changes.DesignSixty-one severely obese subjects, candidates for adjustable gastric banding (AGB, n=20) or Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB, n=41), were enrolled. Twenty-four subjects were followed at 1, 3 and 12 months post-BS. Gut microbiota and serum metabolome were analysed using shotgun metagenomics and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Confirmation groups were included.ResultsLow gene richness (LGC) was present in 75% of patients and correlated with increased trunk-fat mass and comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension and severity). Seventy-eight metagenomic species were altered with LGC, among which 50% were associated with adverse body composition and metabolic phenotypes. Nine serum metabolites (including glutarate, 3-methoxyphenylacetic acid and L-histidine) and functional modules containing protein families involved in their metabolism were strongly associated with low MGR. BS increased MGR 1 year postsurgery, but most RYGB patients remained with low MGR 1 year post-BS, despite greater metabolic improvement than AGB patients.ConclusionsWe identified major gut microbiota alterations in severe obesity, which include decreased MGR and related functional pathways linked with metabolic deteriorations. The lack of full rescue post-BS calls for additional strategies to improve the gut microbiota ecosystem and microbiome–host interactions in severe obesity.Trial registration numberNCT01454232.

scholarly journals  -Cell Function in Severely Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Long-term effects of bariatric surgery

Diabetes Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1002-1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Camastra ◽  
M. Manco ◽  
A. Mari ◽  
A. V. Greco ◽  
S. Frascerra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Type 2 Diabetic Patients ◽  
Severely Obese ◽  
Type 2 Diabetic

scholarly journals How Family Physicians Practice the Principle of Remission Along the Glycemic Continuum

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215013272097774
Author(s):  
Stephanie T. Fulleborn ◽  
Paul F. Crawford ◽  
Jeremy T. Jackson ◽  
Christy J.W. Ledford
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
The United States ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Normal Glucose ◽  
Normal Glucose Regulation

Introduction Recent evidence reveals that diabetes and prediabetes (preDM) can be reversed to normal glucose regulation (NGR) through significant weight loss, but how physicians clinically identify the principles of partial and complete remission of diabetes is largely unknown. Methods As part of the cross-sectional omnibus survey conducted in March 2019 at a professional annual meeting in the United States, physician participants answered case scenario questions about the diagnosis and documentation of patients with preDM and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Results Of the registered conference attendees, 387 (72.7%) responded. When presented with the initial case of preDM, 201 physicians (70.8%) selected R73.03 Prediabetes. In a follow-up encounter with improved lab results, 118 physicians (58.7%) indicated that they would not chart any diabetes-related code and 62 (30.8%) would chart preDM again. When presented with the case of T2DM, 256 physicians (90.1%) indicated E11.0–E11.9 Type 2 Diabetes. In the follow-up encounter, only 38 (14.8%) coded a diagnosis reflecting remission from T2DM to prediabetes and 211 (82.4%) charted T2DM. Conclusion Physicians may be reluctant to document diabetes regression as there is little evidence for long-term outcomes and “downgrading” the diagnosis in the medical record may cause screenings to be missed. Documenting this regression in the medical record should communicate the accurate point on the continuum of glucose intolerance with both the patient and the care team.

scholarly journals Association of Bariatric Surgery With Cancer Incidence in Patients With Obesity and Diabetes: Long-term Results From the Swedish Obese Subjects Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kajsa Sjöholm ◽  
Lena MS Carlsson ◽  
Per-Arne Svensson ◽  
Johanna C. Andersson-Assarsson ◽  
Felipe Kristensson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Diabetes Remission ◽  
Obesity And Diabetes ◽  
Obese Subjects

<b>OBJECTIVE</b> <p>Obesity and type 2 diabetes are associated with serious, adverse health effects, including cancer. Although bariatric surgery has been shown to reduce cancer risk in patients with obesity, the effect of bariatric surgery on cancer risk in patients with obesity and diabetes is less studied. We therefore examined the long-term incidence of cancer after bariatric surgery and usual care in patients with obesity and diabetes in the matched prospective Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. </p> <p><b>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</b></p> <p>The SOS study examines long-term outcomes following bariatric surgery or usual care. The current analysis includes 701 patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes at baseline, 393 of which underwent bariatric surgery, and 308 who received conventional obesity treatment. Information on cancer events was obtained from the Swedish National Cancer Register. Median follow-up time was 21.3 years (interquartile range 17.6-24.8 years, maximum 30.7 years). </p> <p><b>RESULTS</b></p> <p>During follow-up, the incidence rate for first-time cancer was 9.1 per 1000-person-years (95% CI, 7.2-11.5) in patients with obesity and diabetes treated with bariatric surgery and 14.1 per 1000-person-years (95% CI, 11.2-17.7) in patients treated with usual obesity care (HRadj=0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.89, p=0.008). Moreover, surgery was associated with reduced cancer incidence in women (HRadj=0.58; 0.38-0.90, p=0.016), although the sex-treatment interaction was non-significant (p=0.630). In addition, diabetes remission at the 10-year follow-up was associated with reduced cancer incidence (HRadj=0.40; 95% CI 0.22-0.74, p=0.003).</p> <p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p> <p>These results suggest that bariatric surgery prevents cancer in patients with obesity and diabetes, and that durable diabetes remission is associated with reduced cancer risk. </p>

Abstract 15004: Bariatric Surgery is Associated With Reduced Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Burden in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Watson ◽  
Maddalena Ardissino ◽  
Ravi J Amin ◽  
Chanpreet Arhi ◽  
Peter Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: Obesity is an increasingly prevalent global health issue and has a considerable disease burden, including numerous co-morbidities. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is one such co-morbidity associated with a high mortality rate and prevalence, especially in patients with obesity and concomitant Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Bariatric surgery is an effective intervention for patients with obesity, shown to reduce overall cardiovascular disease risk. However, few studies have quantified the long-term impact of bariatric surgery on ASCVD outcomes in the context of key co-morbidities such as T2DM. Hypothesis: Bariatric surgery will improve long-term ASCVD outcomes in obese patients with T2DM. Methods: A nested, nationwide, propensity-matched cohort study was carried out using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The study cohort included 593 patients who underwent bariatric surgery and had no past history of ASCVD. A further 593 patients served as propensity-score matched controls. Patients were followed up for a median time of 47.2 months. The primary composite study endpoint was the incidence of ASCVD defined by a diagnosis of new coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), or other miscellaneous atherosclerotic disease. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality and the incidence of CAD, CeVD, and PAD individually. Results: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery had significantly lower rates of new ASCVD during follow-up (HR 0.53, CI 0.30-0.95, p=0.032). No significant difference was observed in rates of new CAD (HR 0.69, CI 0.32-1.46, p=0.331), CeVD (HR 0.23, CI 0.00-5.45, p=0.1760) and PAD (HR 0.55, CI 0.21-1.43, p=0.218). The bariatric surgery group also had a lower rate of all-cause mortality (HR 0.36, CI 0.19-0.71, p=0.003) compared to controls. Conclusions: In this study, bariatric surgery was associated with improved ASCVD outcomes, as well as lower all-cause mortality, in patients with obesity and T2DM. These findings support the use of bariatric surgery in treating obesity and reducing the burden of its related comorbidities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document