scholarly journals Topline Results of the CARE-PWS Phase 3 Study: Intranasal Carbetocin Improves Hyperphagia and Anxiety and Distress Symptoms in Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A689-A689
Author(s):  
Davis Ryman ◽  
Cheri L Deal
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Prader Willi Syndrome ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Multiple Endpoints ◽  
Behavioral Issues ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a complex genetic disorder associated with multiple neuroendocrine abnormalities including significantly decreased hypothalamic oxytocin levels, resulting in symptoms of severe hyperphagia (an unrelenting false sense of starvation) and multiple severe neuropsychiatric and behavioral issues. CARE-PWS, a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, has evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intranasal carbetocin, a selective oxytocin receptor agonist, in participants with PWS. Eligible participants aged 7 through 18 with genetically confirmed PWS were randomized in equal proportions to three treatment arms for the 8-week placebo-controlled period of the study: carbetocin 9.6 mg, carbetocin 3.2 mg, or a matching placebo, administered by nasal spray three times a day with meals. The primary endpoint assessed changes from baseline to week 8 in Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials (HQ-CT) or Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) scores for the carbetocin 9.6 mg arm vs placebo, and the first secondary endpoint assessed changes from baseline to week 8 in HQ-CT or CY-BOCS scores for the carbetocin 3.2 mg arm vs placebo. Additional secondary endpoints included changes from baseline to week 8 in PWS Anxiety and Distress Questionnaire (PADQ) scores, and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) scores evaluating the overall change in severity of PWS symptoms at week 8. Due to COVID-19, enrollment was closed early with 119 evaluable participants for the primary analysis. In the carbetocin 9.6 mg arm, trends toward numerically greater improvements in HQ-CT and CGI-C scores relative to placebo were observed but did not reach statistical significance; however, the carbetocin 3.2 mg arm demonstrated a significant improvement in HQ-CT scores (LS mean improvement vs placebo -3.14 points, p=0.016). In the 3.2 mg arm, additional consistent evidence of improvements versus placebo was seen in multiple secondary endpoints, including CGI-C (p=0.027) and PADQ (p=0.027). Numeric trends toward improvement in CY-BOCS scores were observed in each dose arm, but did not reach statistical significance versus placebo. During the subsequent long-term follow-up period of the study, both carbetocin arms have experienced continued numeric improvements from baseline across multiple endpoints. Intranasal carbetocin was generally well-tolerated; the most frequently reported adverse event was flushing, which was generally mild and transient. In conclusion, results of the CARE-PWS study support that intranasal carbetocin appears to be safe and well tolerated, and reduces hyperphagia and anxiety and distress behaviors in PWS.

scholarly journals P.010 Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: a single-attack phase 3 study, ACHIEVE II

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (s1) ◽  
pp. S16 ◽  
Author(s):  
RB Lipton ◽  
DW Dodick ◽  
J Ailani ◽  
K Lu ◽  
H Lakkis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Acute Treatment ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Attack Phase ◽  
Headache Pain

Background: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ubrogepant for acute treatment of migraine attacks. Methods: Multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study (NCT02867709). Randomized patients (1:1:1, placebo or ubrogepant 25mg or 50mg) had 60 days to treat one migraine attack (moderate/severe pain intensity). Co-primary efficacy endpoints (2 hours post initial dose): headache pain freedom and absence of most bothersome migraine-associated symptom (MBS). Secondary endpoints: pain relief, sustained pain relief, sustained pain freedom, and absence of migraine-associated symptoms. Results: 1686 patients were randomized (safety population: n=1465; mITT population: n=1355). Mean age: 41 years; white: 81%; female: 89%. Significantly greater proportions of ubrogepant- than placebo-treated patients achieved 2-hour pain freedom (placebo: 14.3%; 25mg: 20.7%, adjusted P=0.0285; 50mg: 21.8%, adjusted P=0.0129) and absence of MBS for 50mg (placebo: 27.4%; 50mg: 38.9%, adjusted P=0.0129). Secondary endpoints (except absence of nausea at 2h) met statistical significance versus placebo for ubrogepant 50mg. Absence of MBS and secondary outcomes were not significant for 25mg after multiplicity adjustment. Ubrogepant’s and placebo’s AE profiles were similar. Conclusions: Co-primary endpoints were met for ubrogepant 50mg. Ubrogepant 25mg was significantly superior to placebo for 2h pain freedom. Ubrogepant was well tolerated. Results support the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of ubrogepant for acute treatment of migraine attacks.

scholarly journals A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sarilumab in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumathi Sivapalasingam ◽  
David Lederer ◽  
Rafia Bhore ◽  
Negin Hajizadeh ◽  
Gerard Criner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Critical Patients

BACKGROUND Sarilumab (anti-interleukin-6 receptor-alpha; monoclonal antibody) may attenuate the inflammatory response in Covid-19. METHODS We performed an adaptive, phase 2/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous sarilumab 200 mg or 400 mg in adults hospitalized with Covid-19. The phase 3 primary analysis population (cohort 1) was patients with critical Covid-19 receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) randomized to sarilumab 400 mg or placebo. The primary end point for phase 3 was the proportion of patients with ≥1-point improvement in clinical status from baseline to day 22. RESULTS Four-hundred fifty-seven (457) and 1365 patients were randomized and treated in phases 2 and 3, respectively. Among phase 3 critical patients receiving MV (n=289; 34.3% on corticosteroids), the proportion with ≥1-point improvement in clinical status (alive not receiving MV) at day 22 was 43.2% in sarilumab 400 mg and 35.5% in placebo (risk difference [RD] +7.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 7.4 to 21.3; P=0.3261), representing a relative risk improvement of 21.7%. Day 29 all-cause mortality was 36.4% in sarilumab 400 mg versus 41.9% in placebo (RD − 5.5%; 95% CI, −20.2 to 8.7; relative risk reduction 13.3%). In post hoc analyses pooling phase 2 and 3 critical patients receiving MV, the hazard ratio (HR) for death in sarilumab 400 mg compared with placebo was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.51 to 1.13) overall, improving to 0.49 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.94) in patients receiving corticosteroids at baseline. CONCLUSION In hospitalized patients with Covid-19 receiving MV, numerical benefits with sarilumab did not achieve statistical significance, but benefit may be greater in patients receiving corticosteroids. A larger study is required to confirm this observed numerical benefit.

scholarly journals EXPRESS: Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil in a Pediatric Population with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Phase 3 randomized, Double Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 204589402110249
Author(s):  
David D Ivy ◽  
Damien Bonnet ◽  
Rolf MF Berger ◽  
Gisela Meyer ◽  
Simin Baygani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Significance Testing ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Statistical Significance Testing ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tadalafil in pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods: This phase-3, international, randomized, multicenter (24 weeks double-blind placebo controlled period; 2-year, open-labelled extension period), add-on (patient’s current endothelin receptor antagonist therapy) study included pediatric patients aged <18 years with PAH. Patients received tadalafil 20 mg or 40 mg based on their weight (Heavy-weight: ≥40 kg; Middle-weight: ≥25—<40 kg) or placebo orally QD for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in 6-minute walk (6MW) distance in patients aged ≥6 years at Week 24. Sample size was amended from 134 to ≥34 patients, due to serious recruitment challenges. Therefore, statistical significance testing was not performed between treatment groups. Results: Patient demographics and baseline characteristics (N=35; tadalafil=17; placebo=18) were comparable between treatment groups; median age was 14.2 years (6.2 to 17.9 years) and majority (71.4%, n=25) of patients were in HW cohort. Least square mean (SE) changes from baseline in 6MW distance at Week 24 was numerically greater with tadalafil versus placebo (60.48 [20.41] vs 36.60 [20.78] meters; placebo-adjusted mean difference [SD] 23.88 [29.11]). Safety of tadalafil treatment was as expected without any new safety concerns. During study period 1, two patients (1 in each group) discontinued due to investigator’s reported clinical worsening, and no deaths were reported. Conclusions: The statistical significance testing was not performed between the treatment groups due to low sample size, however, the study results show positive trend in improvement in non invasive measurements, commonly utilized by clinicians to evaluate the disease status for children with PAH. Safety of tadalafil treatment was as expected without any new safety signals.

scholarly journals Study Design and Baseline Characteristics of the CARDINAL Trial: A Phase 3 Study of Bardoxolone Methyl in Patients with Alport Syndrome

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Glenn M. Chertow ◽  
Gerald B. Appel ◽  
Sharon Andreoli ◽  
Sripal Bangalore ◽  
Geoffrey A. Block ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Function ◽  
Alport Syndrome ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Genetic Diagnosis ◽  
Significant Loss ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Histologic Diagnosis

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Alport syndrome is a rare genetic disorder that affects as many as 60,000 persons in the USA and a total of 103,000 persons (&#x3c;5 per 10,000) in the European Union [1, 2]. It is the second most common inherited cause of kidney failure and is characterized by progressive loss of kidney function that often leads to end-stage kidney disease. Currently, there are no approved disease-specific agents for therapeutic use. We designed a phase 3 study (CARDINAL; NCT03019185) to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bardoxolone methyl in patients with Alport syndrome. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The CARDINAL phase 3 study is an international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized registrational trial. Eligible patients were of ages 12–70 years with confirmed genetic or histologic diagnosis of Alport syndrome, eGFR 30–90 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) ≤3,500 mg/g. Patients with B-type natriuretic peptide values &#x3e;200 pg/mL at baseline or with significant cardiovascular histories were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to bardoxolone methyl or placebo, with stratification by baseline UACR. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 371 patients were screened, and 157 patients were randomly assigned to receive bardoxolone methyl (<i>n</i> = 77) or placebo (<i>n</i> = 80). The average age at screening was 39.2 years, and 23 (15%) were &#x3c;18 years of age. Of the randomized population, 146 (93%) had confirmed genetic diagnosis of Alport syndrome, and 62% of patients had X-linked mode of inheritance. Mean baseline eGFR was 62.7 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and the geometric mean UACR was 141.0 mg/g. The average annual rate of eGFR decline prior to enrollment in the study was −4.9 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> despite 78% of the patient population receiving ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or ARB therapy. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> CARDINAL is one of the largest interventional, randomized controlled trials in Alport syndrome conducted to date. Despite the use of ACEi or ARB, patients were experiencing significant loss of kidney function prior to study entry.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Oritavancin Relative to Vancomycin for Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI) in the Outpatient Setting: Results From the SOLO Clinical Trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Lodise ◽  
Mark Redell ◽  
Shannon O. Armstrong ◽  
Katherine A. Sulham ◽  
G. Ralph Corey
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Efficacy Outcome ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Abstract Background The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oritavancin compared with vancomycin for patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) who received treatment in the outpatient setting in the Phase 3 SOLO clinical trials. Methods SOLO I and SOLO II were 2 identically designed comparative, multicenter, double-blind, randomized studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single 1200-mg dose of intravenous (IV) oritavancin versus 7–10 days of twice-daily IV vancomycin for the treatment of ABSSSI. Protocols were amended to allow enrolled patients to complete their entire course of antimicrobial therapy in an outpatient setting. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite endpoint (cessation of spread or reduction in size of the baseline lesion, absence of fever, and no rescue antibiotic at early clinical evaluation [ECE]) (48 to 72 hours). Key secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed clinical cure 7 to 14 days after end of treatment (posttherapy evaluation [PTE]) and 20% or greater reduction in lesion area at ECE. Safety was assessed until day 60. Results Seven hundred ninety-two patients (oritavancin, 392; vancomycin, 400) received entire course of treatment in the outpatient setting. Efficacy response rates at ECE and PTE were similar (primary composite endpoint at ECE: 80.4% vs 77.5% for oritavancin and vancomycin, respectively) as was incidence of adverse events. Five patients (1.3%) who received oritavancin and 9 (2.3%) vancomycin patients were subsequently admitted to a hospital. Conclusions Oritavancin provides a single-dose alternative to multidose vancomycin for treatment of ABSSSI in the outpatient setting.

Abstract 212: Andexanet Alfa, a Universal Antidote for Reversal of Anticoagulation of Factor Xa Inhibitors in Healthy Human Volunteers

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Crowther ◽  
Alexander M Gold ◽  
Genmin Lu ◽  
Janet M Leeds ◽  
Brian L Wiens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Andexanet Alfa

Introduction: Andexanet alfa (AnXa) is a recombinant modified fXa molecule that acts as a specific antidote for fXa inhibitors. We report clinical results in healthy subjects anticoagulated with apixaban (apix), rivaroxaban (riva), edoxaban (edox), or enoxaparin (enox), demonstrating rapid and sustained reversal of anticoagulation following administration of AnXa. Methods: These were Phase 2/3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in healthy subjects. In Phase 2, about153 subjects age18 - 45 were given one of the fXa inhibitors (apix 5 mg BID, riva 20 mg QD, edox 60 mg QD or enox 40 mg QD) for 6 days. AnXa or placebo (3:1 randomization) was given IV on Day 6, 3hrs after the last inhibitor dose (∼inhibitor Cmax). Safety was followed through Day 48. A range of AnXa doses (bolus or bolus+infusion) was evaluated by correction of biomarkers (anti-fXa activity, free inhibitor concentrations and thrombin generation (TG)). In Phase 3 (ANNEXA™), older subjects age 50 to 75 were dosed with apix (5 mg BID) or riva (20 mg QD) for 4 days. ANNEXA™-A had 63 subjects treated with apix. AnXa (400 mg bolus; 400 mg bolus plus 4 mg/min x 2hr infusion) or placebo (3:1 randomization) was given on Day 4, 3 hrs after the last apix dose. ANNEXA™-R had 82 subjects treated with riva. AnXa (800 mg bolus; 800 mg bolus plus 8 mg/min x 2hr infusion) or placebo (2:1) was given on Day 4, 4 hrs after the last riva dose. Safety was followed through Day 43. Results: About 298 healthy subjects were enrolled in the studies. AnXa demonstrated rapid and sustained reversal of both direct and indirect fXa inhibitors as measured by correction of biomarkers. The ANNEXA™ studies confirmed findings from Phase 2, and met all primary (reversal of anti-fXa) and secondary endpoints (reduction of free inhibitor concentration and restoration of TG) with high statistical significance. AnXa was well-tolerated with no serious adverse events, thrombotic events, or antibodies to fX or fXa reported. Conclusion: AnXa treatment results in rapid and sustained reversal of anticoagulation of fXa inhibitors. A Phase 3b/4 confirmatory study (ANNEXA-4) in patients with acute major bleeds is ongoing.

Analysis of the effect of crossover from placebo (PBO) to darolutamide (DARO) on overall survival (OS) benefit in the ARAMIS Trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 240-240
Author(s):  
Neal D. Shore ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Teuvo Tammela ◽  
Murilo Luz ◽  
Manuel Philco Salas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
The Impact

240 Background: DARO is a structurally distinct androgen receptor inhibitor approved for the treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) based on significantly prolonged metastasis-free survival compared with PBO (median 40.4 vs 18.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.50; P < 0.0001) and a favorable safety profile in the phase III ARAMIS trial. Following unblinding at the primary analysis, crossover from PBO to DARO was permitted for the subsequent open-label treatment phase. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effect of PBO–DARO crossover on OS benefit. Methods: Patients (pts) with nmCRPC receiving androgen deprivation therapy were randomized 2:1 to DARO (n = 955) or PBO (n = 554). In addition to OS, secondary endpoints included times to pain progression, first cytotoxic chemotherapy, first symptomatic skeletal event, and safety. The OS analysis was planned to occur after approximately 240 deaths, and secondary endpoints were evaluated in a hierarchical order. Iterative parameter estimation (IPE) and rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) analyses were performed as pre-planned sensitivity analyses to adjust for the treatment effect of PBO–DARO crossover. The IPE method used a parametric model for the survival times and iteratively determined the model parameter describing the magnitude of the treatment effect, whereas a grid search and non-parametric log-rank test were used for the RPSFT analysis. The IPE and RPSFT analyses both generated a Kaplan–Meier curve for the PBO arm that predicts what would have been observed in the absence of PBO–DARO crossover. Results: After unblinding, 170 pts (30.7% of those randomized to PBO) crossed over from PBO to DARO; median treatment duration from unblinding to the final data cut-off was 11 months. Final analysis of the combined double-blind and open label periods was conducted after 254 deaths (15.5% of DARO and 19.1% of PBO pts) and showed a statistically significant OS benefit for DARO vs PBO (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.53–0.88; P = 0.003). Results from the IPE (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.51–0.84; P < 0.001) and RPSFT (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51–0.90; P = 0.007) analyses were similar to those from the intention-to-treat population, showing that the impact of PBO–DARO crossover was small. Additional analyses accounting for the effect of PBO–DARO crossover will be presented. The safety profile of DARO continued to be favorable at the final analysis, and discontinuation rates at the end of the double-blind period remained unchanged from the primary analysis (8.9% with DARO and 8.7% with PBO). Conclusions: Early treatment with DARO in men with nmCRPC is associated with significant improvement in OS regardless of pts crossing over from PBO to DARO. The safety profile of DARO remained favorable at the final analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT02200614.

scholarly journals The Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Anthropometric Growth and Gut Microbiota Composition in Patients With Prader-Willi Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-Jun Kong ◽  
Guobin Wan ◽  
Ruiyi Tian ◽  
Siyu Liu ◽  
Kevin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gut Microbiome ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Prader Willi Syndrome ◽  
Gut Health ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Microbiome Composition ◽  
Bifidobacterium Animalis ◽  
Probiotic Treatment

Background: Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) is a rare genetic disorder associated with developmental delay, obesity, and neuropsychiatric comorbidities. Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis has demonstrated anti-obesity and anti-inflammatory effects in previous studies.Aim: To evaluate the effects of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis probiotics supplementation on anthropometric growth, behavioral symptoms, and gut microbiome composition in patients with PWS.Methods: Ethical Approval was issued by the Internal Review Board (IRB) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Review-YJ-2016-06). We conducted a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 68 patients with Prader-Willi syndrome aged 11 months−16 years (mean = 4.2 years old) who were randomly assigned to receive daily B. lactis-11 probiotics (6 × 1010 CFUs) or a placebo sachet. Weight, height, ASQ-3, ABC, SRS-2, and CGI-I were compared between the two groups at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks into treatment. Gut microbiome data were analyzed with the QIIME 2 software package, and functional gene analysis was conducted with PICRUSt-2.Results: We found a significant increase in height (mean difference = 2.68 cm, P &lt; 0.05) and improvement in CGI-I (P &lt; 0.05) in the probiotics group compared to the placebo group. No significant change in weight or psychological measures were observed. Probiotic treatment altered the microbiome composition to favor weight loss and gut health and increased the abundance of antioxidant production-related genes.Conclusions: The findings suggest a novel therapeutic potential for Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis probiotics in Prader-Willi syndrome patients, although further investigation is warranted.

scholarly journals 110. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in Chinese Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S67-S68
Author(s):  
Yihong Sun ◽  
Jia Fan ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
Xiaofei Chen ◽  
Xiaoling Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Cure ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Study Drug Administration ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Abdominal Infections

Abstract Background In China, the prevalence of infections due to multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria is high and additional treatment options for complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) are needed. This study compared the efficacy and safety of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) + metronidazole (MTZ) versus meropenem (MEM) + placebo (pbo) for the treatment of cIAI in adult Chinese participants. Methods This was a phase 3, double-blind study conducted at 21 centers in China (NCT03830333). Participants aged 18-75 years with cIAI requiring surgical intervention within 24 hours of study drug administration were stratified by site of infection and randomized 1:1 to receive 1.5 g C/T (1 g ceftolozane and 0.5 g tazobactam) + 0.5 g MTZ administered intravenously (IV) every 8 hours (q8h) or 1 g MEM + pbo administered IV q8h for 4-14 days. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at test of cure (TOC) in the clinically evaluable (CE) population. Secondary endpoints included rates of clinical cure, per-participant microbiologic response, per-pathogen microbiologic response, and adverse events (AE). Non-inferiority for clinical cure at TOC in the CE population was confirmed if the lower bound of the 2-sided 95% CI for the between-treatment difference in the clinical cure rate was larger than −12.5%. Results A total of 134 participants were randomized to each treatment group. Demographics and baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between treatment groups (Table 1). The median (range) age in the ITT population was 50 (18-75) years and 61% were men. The most frequent sites of infection were the appendix (C/T + MTZ, 50.0%; MEM + pbo, 49.3%) and gallbladder (C/T + MTZ, 27.6%; MEM + pbo, 29.1%). Overall, the most frequently isolated pathogens were Escherichia coli (61.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.3%); few anaerobes were isolated (Table 1). C/T + MTZ was non-inferior to MEM + pbo for clinical cure in the CE population (C/T + MTZ, 95.2%; MEM + pbo, 93.1%; difference, 2.1% [95% CI, −4.7% to 8.8%]). Results for key secondary endpoints were comparable between treatment groups (Table 2). Rates of AEs were generally similar between treatment groups (Table 3). Conclusion C/T + MTZ was non-inferior to MEM + pbo in the treatment of adult Chinese participants with cIAI and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. Disclosures Xiaofei Chen, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Xiaoling Du, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Ye Wang, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Hui Wang, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Fang Sun, n/a, MSD, China (Employee) Matthew G. Johnson, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Mekki Bensaci, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Jennifer A. Huntington, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Christopher Bruno, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document