Developmental expression of the Xenopus int-2 (FGF-3) gene: activation by mesodermal and neural induction

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 695-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Tannahill ◽  
H.V. Isaacs ◽  
M.J. Close ◽  
G. Peters ◽  
J.M. Slack
Keyword(s):  
Gene Activation ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Developmental Expression ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Junction Region ◽  
Expression Domain ◽  
Optic Vesicles ◽  
Cranial Ganglia ◽  
Temporal And Spatial ◽  
Early Gastrula

We have used a probe specific for the Xenopus homologue of the mammalian proto-oncogene int-2 (FGF-3) to examine the temporal and spatial expression pattern of the gene during Xenopus development. int-2 is expressed from just before the onset of gastrulation through to prelarval stages. In the early gastrula, it is expressed around the blastopore lip. This is maintained in the posterior third of the prospective mesoderm and neuroectoderm in the neurula. A second expression domain in the anterior third of the neuroectoderm alone appears in the late gastrula, which later resolves into the optic vesicles, hypothalamus and midbrain-hindbrain junction region. Further domains of expression arise in tailbud to prelarval embryos, including the stomodeal mesenchyme, the endoderm of the pharyngeal pouches and the cranial ganglia flanking the otocyst. It is shown, by treatment of blastula ectoderm with bFGF and activin, that int-2 can be expressed in response to mesoderm induction. By heterotypic grafting of gastrula ectoderm into axolotl neural plate, we have also demonstrated that int-2 can be expressed in response to neural induction. These results suggest that int-2 has multiple functions in development, including an early role in patterning of the anteroposterior body axis and a later role in the development of the tail, brain-derived structures and other epithelia.

Fibroblast growth factor is a direct neural inducer, which combined with noggin generates anterior-posterior neural pattern

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (11) ◽  
pp. 3627-3636 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.M. Lamb ◽  
R.M. Harland
Keyword(s):  
Neural Induction ◽  
Neural Tissue ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Gastrula Stage ◽  
Neural Patterning ◽  
The Third ◽  
Dorsal Mesoderm ◽  
Early Gastrula ◽  
Anterior Posterior ◽  
Mesodermal Tissue

Neural tissue in developing Xenopus embryos is induced by signals from the dorsal mesoderm. Induction of anterior neural tissue could be mediated by noggin, a secreted polypeptide found in dorsal mesoderm. We show that bFGF, a known mesoderm inducer of blastula staged ectoderm, induces neural tissue from gastrula stage ectoderm. The type of neural tissue induced by bFGF from stage 10.25 ectoderm is posterior, as marked by Hox B9 expression. When bFGF and noggin are combined on early gastrula stage ectoderm, a more complete neural pattern is generated and no mesodermal tissue is detected. Explants treated with noggin and bFGF elongate and display distinct anterior and posterior ends marked by otx2 and Hox B9 expression, respectively. Furthermore, treatment of early gastrula ectoderm with noggin and bFGF results in the induction of En-2, a marker of the midbrain-hindbrain junction and Krox 20, a marker of the third and fifth rhombomeres of the hindbrain. Neither of these genes is induced by noggin alone or bFGF alone at this stage, suggesting a synergy in anterior-posterior neural patterning. The response of later gastrula (stage 11–12) ectoderm to bFGF changes so that Krox 20 and En-2 are induced by bFGF alone, while induction of more posterior tissue marked by Hox B9 is eliminated. The dose of bFGF affects the amount of neural tissue induced, but has little effect on the anterior-posterior character, rather the age of the ectoderm treated is the determinant of the response. Thus, an FGF signal may account for posterior neural induction, and anterior-posterior neural patterning could be partly explained by the actions of noggin and FGF, together with the changing response of the ectoderm to these factors.

The cleavage stage origin of Spemann's Organizer: analysis of the movements of blastomere clones before and during gastrulation in Xenopus

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 1179-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.V. Bauer ◽  
S. Huang ◽  
S.A. Moody
Keyword(s):  
Neural Induction ◽  
Axis Formation ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Animal Pole ◽  
Genetic Manipulations ◽  
Spemann's Organizer ◽  
History Of ◽  
Clonal Origin ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Early Gastrula

Recent investigations into the roles of early regulatory genes, especially those resulting from mesoderm induction or first expressed in the gastrula, reveal a need to elucidate the developmental history of the cells in which their transcripts are expressed. Although fates both of the early blastomeres and of regions of the gastrula have been mapped, the relationship between the two sets of fate maps is not clear and the clonal origin of the regions of the stage 10 embryo are not known. We mapped the positions of each blastomere clone during several late blastula and early gastrula stages to show where and when these clones move. We found that the dorsal animal clone (A1) begins to move away from the animal pole at stage 8, and the dorsal animal marginal clone (B1) leaves the animal cap by stage 9. The ventral animal clones (A4 and B4) spread into the dorsal animal cap region as the dorsal clones recede. At stage 10, the ventral animal clones extend across the entire dorsal animal cap. These changes in the blastomere constituents of the animal cap during epiboly may contribute to the changing capacity of the cap to respond to inductive growth factors. Pregastrulation movements of clones also result in the B1 clone occupying the vegetal marginal zone to become the primary progenitor of the dorsal lip of the blastopore (Spemann's Organizer). This report provides the fundamental descriptions of clone locations during the important periods of axis formation, mesoderm induction and neural induction. These will be useful for the correct targeting of genetic manipulations of early regulatory events.

Developmental expression of a neurofilament-M and two vimentin-like genes in Xenopus laevis

Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.R. Sharpe
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Intermediate Filament ◽  
Acid Level ◽  
Amino Acid Level ◽  
Cdna Probe ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Developmental Expression ◽  
Temporal And Spatial Patterns ◽  
Temporal And Spatial

A hamster vimentin cDNA probe has been used to isolate and characterize three Xenopus laevis intermediate filament genes, named XIF1, XIF3 and XIF6. Of these, XIF6 shows 89% homology at the amino acid level to a portion of porcine neurofilament-M. XIF6 is transcribed solely in nervous tissue of embryos, commencing at the late neural tube stage. Expression is totally dependent on an interaction between mesoderm and ectoderm during gastrulation and can be used as a marker of neural induction. XIF1 shows 94% homology and XIF3 83% homology to hamster vimentin at the amino acid level over a region of the protein. Although XIF1 and XIF3 show more homology to vimentin than to any other intermediate filament gene, they have distinct temporal and spatial patterns of expression. XIF1 expression most resembles that of vimentin in higher vertebrates, being expressed in embryonic myotome and nerve cord, whilst XIF3 is unusual in that its expression is restricted predominantly to the head in tailbud embryos.

Muscle gene activation in Xenopus requires intercellular communication during gastrula as well as blastula stages

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Gurdon ◽  
K. Kao ◽  
K. Kato ◽  
N. D. Hopwood
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Developmental Stage ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Intercellular Communication ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Gastrula Stage ◽  
Blastula Stage ◽  
Morphological Marker ◽  
Muscle Gene ◽  
Early Gastrula

In Xenopus an early morphological marker of mesodermal induction is the elongation of the mesoderm at the early gastrula stage (Symes and Smith, 1987). We show here that the elongation of equatorial (marginal) tissue is dependent on protein synthesis in a mid blastula, but has become independent of it by the late blastula stage. In animal caps induced to become mesoderm, the time when protein synthesis is required for subsequent elongation immediately follows the time of induction, and is not related to developmental stage. For elongation, intercellular communication during the blastula stage is of primary importance. Current experiments involving cell transplantation indicate a need for further celhcell interactions during gastrulation, and therefore after the vegetal-animal induction during blastula stages. These secondary cell interactions are believed to take place among cells that have already received a vegetal induction, and may facilitate some of the later intracellular events known to accompany muscle gene activation.

Expression of N-CAM precedes neural induction in Pleurodeles waltl (urodele, amphibian)

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.P. Saint-Jeannet ◽  
F. Foulquier ◽  
C. Goridis ◽  
A.M. Duprat
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Gastrula Stage ◽  
Pleurodeles Waltl ◽  
Early Gastrula

The appearance and localization of N-CAM during neural induction were studied in Pleurodeles waltl embryos and compared with recent contradictory results reported in Xenopus laevis. A monoclonal antibody raised against mouse N-CAM was used. In the nervous system of Pleurodeles, it recognized two glycoproteins of 180 and 140×10(3) M(r) which are the Pleurodeles equivalent of N-CAM-180 and -140. Using this probe for immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry, we showed that N-CAM was already expressed in presumptive ectoderm at the early gastrula stage. In late gastrula embryos, a slight increase in staining was observed in the neurectoderm, whereas the labelling persisted in the noninduced ectoderm. When induced ectodermal cells were isolated at the late gastrula stage and cultured in vitro up to 14 days, a faint polarized labelling of cells was observed initially. During differentiation, the staining increased and became progressively restricted to differentiating neurons.

Mechanism of anteroposterior axis specification in vertebrates. Lessons from the amphibians

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Slack ◽  
D. Tannahill
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Signal Transduction Pathway ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Neural Plate ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Inducing Factors ◽  
Almost All

Interest in the problem of anteroposterior specification has quickened because of our near understanding of the mechanism in Drosophila and because of the homology of Antennapedia-like homeobox gene expression patterns in Drosophila and vertebrates. But vertebrates differ from Drosophila because of morphogenetic movements and interactions between tissue layers, both intimately associated with anteroposterior specification. The purpose of this article is to review classical findings and to enquire how far these have been confirmed, refuted or extended by modern work. The “pre-molecular” work suggests that there are several steps to the process: (i) Formation of anteroposterior pattern in mesoderm during gastrulation with posterior dominance. (ii) Regional specific induction of ectoderm to form neural plate. (iii) Reciprocal interactions from neural plate to mesoderm. (iv) Interactions within neural plate with posterior dominance. Unfortunately, almost all the observable markers are in the CNS rather than in the mesoderm where the initial specification is thought to occur. This has meant that the specification of the mesoderm has been assayed indirectly by transplantation methods such as the Einsteckung. New molecular markers now supplement morphological ones but they are still mainly in the CNS and not the mesoderm. A particular interest attaches to the genes of the Antp-like HOX clusters since these may not only be markers but actual coding factors for anteroposterior levels. We have a new understanding of mesoderm induction based on the discovery of activins and fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) as candidate inducing factors. These factors have later consequences for anteroposterior pattern with activin tending to induce anterior, and FGF posterior structures. Recent work on neural induction has implicated cAMP and protein kinase C (PKC) as elements of the signal transduction pathway and has provided new evidence for the importance of tangential neural induction. The regional specificity of neural induction has been reinvestigated using molecular markers and provides conclusions rather similar to the classical work. Defects in the axial pattern may be produced by retinoic acid but it remains unclear whether its effects are truly coordinate ones or are concentrated in certain regions of high sensitivity. In general the molecular studies have supported and reinforced the “pre-molecular ones”. Important questions still remain: (i) How much pattern is there in the mesoderm (how many states?) (ii) How is this pattern generated by the invaginating organizer? (iii) Is there one-to-one transmission of codings to the neural plate? (iv) What is the nature of the interactions within the neural plate? (v) Are the HOX cluster genes really the anteroposterior codings?

XIPOU 2, a noggin-inducible gene, has direct neuralizing activity

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 721-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.E. Witta ◽  
V.R. Agarwal ◽  
S.M. Sato
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Neuronal Phenotype ◽  
Pou Domain ◽  
Spemann's Organizer ◽  
Stage Embryo ◽  
Synthetic Mrna

XIPOU 2, a member of the class III POU domain family, is expressed initially in Spemann's organizer, and later, in discrete regions of the developing nervous system in Xenopus laevis. XIPOU 2 may act downstream from initial neural induction events, since it is activated by the neural inducer, noggin. To determine if XIPOU 2 participates in the early events of neurogenesis, synthetic mRNA was microinjected into specific blastomeres of the 32-cell stage embryo. Misexpression of XIPOU 2 in the epidermis causes a direct switch in cell fate from an epidermal to a neuronal phenotype. In the absence of mesoderm induction, XIPOU 2 has the ability to induce a neuronal phenotype in uncommitted ectoderm. These data demonstrate the potential of XIPOU 2 to act as a master regulator of neurogenesis.

A role for cytoplasmic determinants in mesoderm patterning: cell-autonomous activation of the goosecoid and Xwnt-8 genes along the dorsoventral axis of early Xenopus embryos

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 1191-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lemaire ◽  
J.B. Gurdon
Keyword(s):  
Gene Activation ◽  
Cell Communication ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Mesoderm Cell ◽  
Xenopus Embryos ◽  
Cell Dispersion ◽  
Embryo Axes ◽  
Alpha Actin ◽  
Cytoplasmic Determinants

Although an induction event is required for the formation of mesoderm in Xenopus embryos, it is not clear that this induction is wholly sufficient to give rise to a correctly patterned mesodermal layer. We have studied the expression of the two genes, goosecoid and Xwnt-8, in Xenopus gastrulae in which cell-cell communication, and therefore mesoderm induction, has been prevented by frequent cell dispersion. Although neither the early panmesodermal marker Xbra nor the muscle-specific alpha-actin gene were activated under these conditions, goosecoid and Xwnt-8 were activated in cells of dorsal and ventrolateral origin respectively, thus correctly reflecting their distribution during normal development. We also show that the spatial pattern of expression of these two genes along the animal-vegetal axis is similar in normal and in dissociated early gastrulae: goosecoid is mainly expressed in future mesoderm while the domain of expression of Xwnt-8 spans the mesoderm-endoderm boundary. These results show that, during the blastula and early gastrula stages, gene activation can be controlled cell-autonomously along both the animal-vegetal and dorsoventral embryo axes. This suggests that the inheritance of localised maternal cytoplasmic determinants is a key event for the patterning of mesoderm. We present a modified model of mesoderm formation in which the different mesoderm cell types are produced as a result of cooperation between induction-dependent and induction-independent immediate-early genes.

Neural Activation and Transformation in Explants of Competent Ectoderm under the Influence of Fragments of Anterior Notochord in Urodeles

Development ◽  
1954 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-193
Author(s):  
P. D. Nieuwkoop ◽  
G. v. Nigtevecht
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Spatial Relations ◽  
Neural Activation ◽  
Stages Of Development ◽  
Temporal And Spatial ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Autonomous Development

Experiments in which folds of competent ectoderm were attached to neural plates of host embryos at various cranio-caudal levels (Nieuwkoop et al., 1952) suggested that two successive influences emanate from the underlying archenteron roof: a first one representing a more or less non-specific activation which leads autonomously to a differentiation in a prosencephalic direction; and a second one transforming these prosencephalic differentiation tendencies into more caudal ones leading to the formation of rhombencephalon and spinal cord. The work of Eyal-Giladi (1954) in which the temporal and spatial relations of neural induction were analysed by means of an interruption of the induction at various stages of development and at various cranio-caudal levels of the presumptive neural area showed very clearly that during gastrulation two successive waves of induction actually pass through the presumptive neuro-ectoderm in a caudo-cranial direction. The first wave, which emanates from the presumptive prechordal material, leads to an activation of the ectoderm and its autonomous development in a prosencephalic direction.

Transgenic Xenopus embryos from sperm nuclear transplantations reveal FGF signaling requirements during gastrulation

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (10) ◽  
pp. 3173-3183 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.L. Kroll ◽  
E. Amaya
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Dominant Negative Mutant ◽  
Mesoderm Induction ◽  
Fgf Signaling ◽  
Fgf Receptor ◽  
Transgenic Expression

We have developed a simple approach for large-scale transgenesis in Xenopus laevis embryos and have used this method to identify in vivo requirements for FGF signaling during gastrulation. Plasmids are introduced into decondensed sperm nuclei in vitro using restriction enzyme-mediated integration (REMI). Transplantation of these nuclei into unfertilized eggs yields hundreds of normal, diploid embryos per day which develop to advanced stages and express integrated plasmids nonmosaically. Transgenic expression of a dominant negative mutant of the FGF receptor (XFD) after the mid-blastula stage uncouples mesoderm induction, which is normal, from maintenance of mesodermal markers, which is lost during gastrulation. By contrast, embryos expressing XFD contain well-patterned nervous systems despite a putative role for FGF in neural induction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document