Discrete Polycomb-binding sites in each parasegmental domain of the bithorax complex

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 1681-1689 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Chiang ◽  
M.B. O'Connor ◽  
R. Paro ◽  
J. Simon ◽  
W. Bender
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Lacz Reporter Gene ◽  
Regulatory Regions ◽  
Cooperative Action ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Regulatory Dna ◽  
Segmental Expression

The Polycomb protein of Drosophila melanogaster maintains the segmental expression limits of the homeotic genes in the bithorax complex. Polycomb-binding sites within the bithorax complex were mapped by immunostaining of salivary gland polytene chromosomes. Polycomb bound to four DNA fragments, one in each of four successive parasegmental regulatory regions. These fragments correspond exactly to the ones that can maintain segmentally limited expression of a lacZ reporter gene. Thus, Polycomb acts directly on discrete multiple sites in bithorax regulatory DNA. Constructs combining fragments from different regulatory regions demonstrate that Polycomb-dependent maintenance elements can act on multiple pattern initiation elements, and that maintenance elements can work together. The cooperative action of maintenance elements may motivate the linear order of the bithorax complex.

scholarly journals Interactions of Drosophila Ultrabithorax Regulatory Regions With Native and Foreign Promoters

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Casares ◽  
Welcome Bender ◽  
John Merriam ◽  
Ernesto Sánchez-Herrero
Keyword(s):  
P Element ◽  
Lacz Gene ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Lacz Reporter ◽  
Normal Pattern ◽  
Lacz Reporter Gene ◽  
Regulatory Regions ◽  
Long Range Interactions ◽  
In Trans ◽  
Dependent Interaction

The Ultrabithorax (Ubx) gene of the Drosophila bithorax complex is required to specify parasegments 5 and 6. Two P-element “enhancer traps” have been recovered within the locus that contain the bacterial lacZ gene under the control of the P-element promoter. The P insertion that is closer to the Ubx promoter expresses lucZ in a pattern similar to that of the normal Ubx gene, but also in parasegment 4 during embryonic development. Two deletions have been recovered that remove the normal Ubx promoter plus several kilobases on either side, but retain the lacZ reporter gene. The lacZ patterns from the deletion derivatives closely match the normal pattern of Ubx expression in late embryos and imaginal discs. The lacZ genes in the deletion derivatives are also negatively regulated by Ubx and activated in trans by Contrabithorax mutations, again like the normal Ubx gene. Thus, the deleted regions, including several kilobases around the Ubx promoter, are not required for long range interactions with Ubx regulatory regions. The deletion derivatives also stimulate transvection, a pairing-dependent interaction with the Ubx promoter on the homologous chromosome.

Enhancer traps in the Drosophila bithorax complex mark parasegmental domains.

Genetics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-399
Author(s):  
K McCall ◽  
M B O'Connor ◽  
W Bender
Keyword(s):  
Protein Pattern ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
P Element ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Lacz Expression ◽  
Regulatory Regions ◽  
P Elements ◽  
Endogenous Genes ◽  
Beta Galactosidase

Abstract Eight P elements carrying a beta-galactosidase (lacZ) reporter have been mapped to sites within the Drosophila bithorax complex. The bithorax complex contains three homeotic genes, and at least nine regulatory regions which control their expression in successive parasegments of the fly. The enhancer traps inserted at the promoter of one of the genes, Ultrabithorax, express lacZ in patterns which mimic the Ultrabithorax protein pattern. Enhancer traps in the regulatory regions do not mimic the endogenous genes, but express lacZ globally in the relevant parasegments. Some P elements carry large DNA fragments upstream of the lacZ promoter but internal to the P element. In cases where these internal sequences specify a lacZ pattern, that pattern is generally suppressed when the element is inserted in the bithorax complex. In embryos mutant for genes of the Polycomb group, the lacZ expression from the enhancer traps spreads to all segments. Thus, the enhancer traps reveal parasegmental domains that are maintained by Polycomb-mediated repression. Such domains may be realized by parasegmental differences in chromatin structure.

scholarly journals Polycomb Group Repression Reduces DNA Accessibility

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 6585-6597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Fitzgerald ◽  
Welcome Bender
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Dna Accessibility ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Number Of Genes

ABSTRACT The Polycomb group proteins are responsible for long-term repression of a number of genes in Drosophila melanogaster, including the homeotic genes of the bithorax complex. The Polycomb protein is thought to alter the chromatin structure of its target genes, but there has been little direct evidence for this model. In this study, the chromatin structure of the bithorax complex was probed with three separate assays for DNA accessibility: (i) activation of polymerase II (Pol II) transcription by Gal4, (ii) transcription by the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (T7RNAP), and (iii) FLP-mediated site-specific recombination. All three processes are restricted or blocked in Polycomb-repressed segments. In contrast, control test sites outside of the bithorax complex permitted Gal4, T7RNAP, and FLP activities throughout the embryo. Several P insertions in the bithorax complex were tested, providing evidence that thePolycomb-induced effect is widespread over target genes. This accessibility effect is similar to that seen for SIR silencing inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. In contrast to SIR silencing, however, episomes excised fromPolycomb-repressed chromosomal sites do not show an altered superhelix density.

scholarly journals The bithorax complex iab-7 Polycomb Response Element has a novel role in the functioning of the Fab-7 chromatin boundary

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Kyrchanova ◽  
Amina Kurbidaeva ◽  
Marat Sabirov ◽  
Nikolay Postika ◽  
Daniel Wolle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Boundary Function ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Response Element ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Polycomb Response Element ◽  
Nuclear Extracts

AbstractExpression of the three Bithorax complex homeotic genes is orchestrated by nine parasegment-specific regulatory domains. Autonomy of each domain is conferred by boundary elements (insulators). Here, we have used an in situ replacement strategy to reanalyze the sequences required for the functioning of one of the best-characterized fly boundaries, Fab-7. It was initially identified by a deletion, Fab-71, that transformed parasegment (PS) 11 into a duplicate copy of PS12. Fab-71 deleted four nuclease hypersensitive sites, HS*, HS1, HS2, and HS3, located in between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains. Transgene and P-element excision experiments mapped the boundary to HS*+HS1+HS2, while HS3 was shown to be the iab-7 Polycomb response element (PRE). Recent replacement experiments showed that HS1 is both necessary and sufficient for boundary activity when HS3 is also presented in the replacement construct. Surprisingly, while HS1+HS3 combination has full boundary activity, we discovered that HS1 alone has only minimal function. Moreover, when combined with HS3, only the distal half of HS1, dHS1, is needed. A ∼1,000 kD multiprotein complex containing the GAF protein, called the LBC, binds to the dHS1 sequence and we show that mutations in dHS1 that disrupt LBC binding in nuclear extracts eliminate boundary activity and GAF binding in vivo. HS3 has binding sites for GAF and Pho proteins that are required for PRE silencing. In contrast, HS3 boundary activity only requires the GAF binding sites. LBC binding with HS3 in nuclear extracts, and GAF association in vivo depend upon the HS3 GAF sites, but not the Pho sites. Consistent with a role for the LBC in HS3 boundary activity, the boundary function of the dHS1+HS3mPho combination is lost when the flies are heterozygous for a mutation in the GAF gene. Taken together, these results reveal a novel function for the iab-7 PREs in chromosome architecture.Author SummaryPolycomb group proteins (PcG) are important epigenetic regulators of developmental genes in all higher eukaryotes. In Drosophila, these proteins are bound to specific regulatory DNA elements called Polycomb group Response Elements (PREs). PcG support proper patterns of homeotic gene expression throughout development. Drosophila PREs are made up of binding sites for a complex array of DNA binding proteins, including GAF and Pho. In the regulatory region of the bithorax complex (BX-C), the boundary/insulator elements organize the autonomous regulatory domains, and their active or repressed states are regulated by PREs. Here, we studied the domain organization of the Fab-7 boundary and the neighboring PRE, which separate the iab-6 and iab-7 domains involved in transcription of the Abd-B gene. It was previously thought that PRE recruits PcG proteins that inhibit activation of the iab-7 enhancers in the inappropriate domains. However, here we found that PRE contributes to boundary activity and in combination with a key 242 bp Fab-7 region (dHS1) can form a completely functional boundary. Late Boundary Complex (LBC) binds not only to dHS1 but also to PRE and is required for the boundary activity of both elements. At the same time, mutations of Pho binding sites strongly diminish recruiting of PcG but do not considerably affect boundary function, suggesting that these activities can be separated in PRE.

scholarly journals Prediction of genome-wide effects of single nucleotide variants on transcription factor binding

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Carrasco Pro ◽  
Katia Bulekova ◽  
Brian Gregor ◽  
Adam Labadorf ◽  
Juan Ignacio Fuxman Bass
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Single Nucleotide Variants ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Regulatory Regions ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) located in transcriptional regulatory regions can result in gene expression changes that lead to adaptive or detrimental phenotypic outcomes. Here, we predict gain or loss of binding sites for 741 transcription factors (TFs) across the human genome. We calculated ‘gainability’ and ‘disruptability’ scores for each TF that represent the likelihood of binding sites being created or disrupted, respectively. We found that functional cis-eQTL SNVs are more likely to alter TF binding sites than rare SNVs in the human population. In addition, we show that cancer somatic mutations have different effects on TF binding sites from different TF families on a cancer-type basis. Finally, we discuss the relationship between these results and cancer mutational signatures. Altogether, we provide a blueprint to study the impact of SNVs derived from genetic variation or disease association on TF binding to gene regulatory regions.

scholarly journals Trichloroethylene-induced alterations in DNA methylation were enriched in polycomb protein binding sites in effector/memory CD4+ T cells

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Gilbert ◽  
Sarah J. Blossom ◽  
Brad Reisfeld ◽  
Stephen W. Erickson ◽  
Kanan Vyas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Protein Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Effector Memory ◽  
Protein Binding Sites ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Memory Cd4 T Cells

Conserved and distinct roles of kreisler in regulation of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Manzanares ◽  
S. Cordes ◽  
L. Ariza-McNaughton ◽  
V. Sadl ◽  
K. Maruthainar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Anteroposterior Patterning ◽  
Endogenous Gene ◽  
Transgenic Embryos ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Segmental Expression

During anteroposterior patterning of the developing hindbrain, the anterior expression of 3′ Hox genes maps to distinct rhombomeric boundaries and, in many cases, is upregulated in specific segments. Paralogous genes frequently have similar anterior boundaries of expression but it is not known if these are controlled by common mechanisms. The expression of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes extends from the posterior spinal cord up to the rhombomere (r) 4/5 boundary and both genes are upregulated specifically in r5. However, in this study, we have found that Hoxa3 expression is also upregulated in r6, showing that there are differences in segmental expression between paralogues. We have used transgenic analysis to investigate the mechanisms underlying the pattern of segmental expression of Hoxa3. We found that the intergenic region between Hoxa3 and Hoxa4 contains several enhancers, which summed together mediate a pattern of expression closely resembling that of the endogenous Hoxa3 gene. One enhancer specifically directs expression in r5 and r6, in a manner that reflects the upregulation of the endogenous gene in these segments. Deletion analysis localized this activity to a 600 bp fragment that was found to contain a single high-affinity binding site for the Maf bZIP protein Krml1, encoded by the kreisler gene. This site is necessary for enhancer activity and when multimerized it is sufficient to direct a kreisler-like pattern in transgenic embryos. Furthermore the r5/r6 enhancer activity is dependent upon endogenous kreisler and is activated by ectopic kreisler expression. This demonstrates that Hoxa3, along with its paralog Hoxb3, is a direct target of kreisler in the mouse hindbrain. Comparisons between the Krml1-binding sites in the Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 enhancers reveal that there are differences in both the number of binding sites and way that kreisler activity is integrated and restricted by these two control regions. Analysis of the individual sites revealed that they have different requirements for mediating r5/r6 and dorsal roof plate expression. Therefore, the restriction of Hoxb3 to r5 and Hoxa3 to r5 and r6, together with expression patterns of Hoxb3 in other vertebrate species suggests that these regulatory elements have a common origin but have later diverged during vertebrate evolution.

The domino gene of Drosophila encodes novel members of the SWI2/SNF2 family of DNA-dependent ATPases, which contribute to the silencing of homeotic genes

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (8) ◽  
pp. 1429-1441 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Ruhf ◽  
A. Braun ◽  
O. Papoulas ◽  
J.W. Tamkun ◽  
N. Randsholt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Protein Isoforms ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Trithorax Group ◽  
A Subunit ◽  
The Common ◽  
Hematopoietic Disorders

The Drosophila domino gene has been isolated in a screen for mutations that cause hematopoietic disorders. Generation and analysis of loss-of-function domino alleles show that the phenotypes are typical for proliferation gene mutations. Clonal analysis demonstrates that domino is necessary for cell viability and proliferation, as well as for oogenesis. domino encodes two protein isoforms of 3202 and 2498 amino acids, which contain a common N-terminal region but divergent C termini. The common region includes a 500 amino acid DNA-dependent ATPase domain of the SWI2/SNF2 family of proteins, which function via interaction with chromatin. We show that, although domino alleles do not exhibit homeotic phenotypes by themselves, domino mutations enhance Polycomb group mutations and counteract Trithorax group effects. The Domino proteins are present in large complexes in embryo extracts, and one isoform binds to a number of discrete sites on larval polytene chromosomes. Altogether, the data lead us to propose that domino acts as a repressor by interfering with chromatin structure. This activity is likely to be performed as a subunit of a chromatin-remodeling complex.

scholarly journals A Common Motif within the Negative Regulatory Regions of Multiple Factors Inhibits Their Transcriptional Synergy

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 6040-6050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge A. Iñiguez-Lluhí ◽  
David Pearce
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Proper Function ◽  
Protein Motif ◽  
Regulatory Regions ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Common Motif ◽  
Single Response ◽  
Dna Regulatory Elements

ABSTRACT DNA regulatory elements frequently harbor multiple recognition sites for several transcriptional activators. The response mounted from such compound response elements is often more pronounced than the simple sum of effects observed at single binding sites. The determinants of such transcriptional synergy and its control, however, are poorly understood. Through a genetic approach, we have uncovered a novel protein motif that limits the transcriptional synergy of multiple DNA-binding regulators. Disruption of these conserved synergy control motifs (SC motifs) selectively increases activity at compound, but not single, response elements. Although isolated SC motifs do not regulate transcription when tethered to DNA, their transfer to an activator lacking them is sufficient to impose limits on synergy. Mechanistic analysis of the two SC motifs found in the glucocorticoid receptor N-terminal region reveals that they function irrespective of the arrangement of the receptor binding sites or their distance from the transcription start site. Proper function, however, requires the receptor's ligand-binding domain and an engaged dimer interface. Notably, the motifs are not functional in yeast and do not alter the effect of p160 coactivators, suggesting that they require other nonconserved components to operate. Many activators across multiple classes harbor seemingly unrelated negative regulatory regions. The presence of SC motifs within them, however, suggests a common function and identifies SC motifs as critical elements of a general mechanism to modulate higher-order interactions among transcriptional regulators.

scholarly journals SiteOut: an online tool to design binding site-free DNA sequences

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Estrada ◽  
Teresa Ruiz-Herrero ◽  
Clarissa Scholes ◽  
Zeba Wunderlich ◽  
Angela DePace
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Major Goal ◽  
Specific Sequence ◽  
Online Tool ◽  
Protein Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Dna

DNA-binding proteins control many fundamental biological processes such as transcription, recombination and replication. A major goal is to decipher the role that DNA sequence plays in orchestrating the binding and activity of such regulatory proteins. To address this goal, it is useful to rationally design DNA sequences with desired numbers, affinities and arrangements of protein binding sites. However, removing binding sites from DNA is computationally non-trivial since one risks creating new sites in the process of deleting or moving others. Here we present an online binding site removal tool, SiteOut, that enables users to design arbitrary DNA sequences that entirely lack binding sites for factors of interest. SiteOut can also be used to delete sites from a specific sequence, or to introduce site-free spacers between functional sequences without creating new sites at the junctions. In combination with commercial DNA synthesis services, SiteOut provides a powerful and flexible platform for synthetic projects that interrogate regulatory DNA. Here we describe the algorithm and illustrate the ways in which SiteOut can be used; it is publicly available at https://depace.med.harvard.edu/siteout/

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document