Homeotic response elements are tightly linked to tissue-specific elements in a transcriptional enhancer of the teashirt gene

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 2799-2812 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. McCormick ◽  
N. Core ◽  
S. Kerridge ◽  
M.P. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Transcriptional Enhancer ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Conserved Sequences

Along the anterior-posterior axis of animal embryos, the choice of cell fates, and the organization of morphogenesis, is regulated by transcription factors encoded by clustered homeotic or ‘Hox’ genes. Hox genes function in both epidermis and internal tissues by regulating the transcription of target genes in a position- and tissue-specific manner. Hox proteins can have distinct targets in different tissues; the mechanisms underlying tissue and homeotic protein specificity are unknown. Light may be shed by studying the organization of target gene enhancers. In flies, one of the target genes is teashirt (tsh), which encodes a zinc finger protein. tsh itself is a homeotic gene that controls trunk versus head development. We identified a tsh gene enhancer that is differentially activated by Hox proteins in epidermis and mesoderm. Sites where Antennapedia (Antp) and Ultrabithorax (Ubx) proteins bind in vitro were mapped within evolutionarily conserved sequences. Although Antp and Ubx bind to identical sites in vitro, Antp activates the tsh enhancer only in epidermis while Ubx activates the tsh enhancer in both epidermis and in somatic mesoderm. We show that the DNA elements driving tissue-specific transcriptional activation by Antp and Ubx are separable. Next to the homeotic protein-binding sites are extensive conserved sequences likely to control tissue activation by different homeodomain proteins. We propose that local interactions between homeotic proteins and other factors effect activation of targets in proper cell types.

Hox proteins have different affinities for a consensus DNA site that correlate with the positions of their genes on the hox cluster

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 4532-4545
Author(s):  
I Pellerin ◽  
C Schnabel ◽  
K M Catron ◽  
C Abate
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Properties ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Hox Cluster ◽  
Dna Binding Properties

The hox genes, members of a family of essential developmental regulators, have the intriguing property that their expression in the developing murine embryo is colinear with their chromosomal organization. Members of the hox gene family share a conserved DNA binding domain, termed the homeodomain, which mediates interactions of Hox proteins with DNA regulatory elements in the transcriptional control regions of target genes. In this study, we characterized the DNA binding properties of five representative members of the Hox family: HoxA5, HoxB4, HoxA7, HoxC8, and HoxB1. To facilitate a comparative analysis of their DNA binding properties, we produced the homeodomain regions of these Hox proteins in Escherichia coli and obtained highly purified polypeptides. We showed that these Hox proteins interact in vitro with a common consensus DNA site that contains the motif (C/G)TAATTG. We further showed that the Hox proteins recognize the consensus DNA site in vivo, as determined by their ability to activate transcription through this site in transient transfection assays. Although they interact optimally with the consensus DNA site, the Hox proteins exhibit subtle, but distinct, preferences for DNA sites that contain variations of the nucleotides within the consensus motif. In addition to their modest differences in DNA binding specificities, the Hox proteins also vary in their relative affinities for DNA. Intriguingly, their relative affinities correlate with the positions of their respective genes on the hox cluster. These findings suggest that subtle differences in DNA binding specificity combined with differences in DNA binding affinity constitute features of the "Hox code" that contribute to the selective functions of Hox proteins during murine embryogenesis.

scholarly journals Hox proteins have different affinities for a consensus DNA site that correlate with the positions of their genes on the hox cluster.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 4532-4545 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Pellerin ◽  
C Schnabel ◽  
K M Catron ◽  
C Abate
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Properties ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Hox Cluster ◽  
Dna Binding Properties

The hox genes, members of a family of essential developmental regulators, have the intriguing property that their expression in the developing murine embryo is colinear with their chromosomal organization. Members of the hox gene family share a conserved DNA binding domain, termed the homeodomain, which mediates interactions of Hox proteins with DNA regulatory elements in the transcriptional control regions of target genes. In this study, we characterized the DNA binding properties of five representative members of the Hox family: HoxA5, HoxB4, HoxA7, HoxC8, and HoxB1. To facilitate a comparative analysis of their DNA binding properties, we produced the homeodomain regions of these Hox proteins in Escherichia coli and obtained highly purified polypeptides. We showed that these Hox proteins interact in vitro with a common consensus DNA site that contains the motif (C/G)TAATTG. We further showed that the Hox proteins recognize the consensus DNA site in vivo, as determined by their ability to activate transcription through this site in transient transfection assays. Although they interact optimally with the consensus DNA site, the Hox proteins exhibit subtle, but distinct, preferences for DNA sites that contain variations of the nucleotides within the consensus motif. In addition to their modest differences in DNA binding specificities, the Hox proteins also vary in their relative affinities for DNA. Intriguingly, their relative affinities correlate with the positions of their respective genes on the hox cluster. These findings suggest that subtle differences in DNA binding specificity combined with differences in DNA binding affinity constitute features of the "Hox code" that contribute to the selective functions of Hox proteins during murine embryogenesis.

scholarly journals Interaction between the trout mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors in vitro

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia Kiilerich ◽  
Gérard Triqueneaux ◽  
Nynne Meyn Christensen ◽  
Vincent Trayer ◽  
Xavier Terrien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptors ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis

The salmonid corticosteroid receptors (CRs), glucocorticoid receptors 1 and 2 (GR1 and GR2) and the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) share a high degree of homology with regard to structure, ligand- and DNA response element-binding, and cellular co-localization. Typically, these nuclear hormone receptors homodimerize to confer transcriptional activation of target genes, but a few studies using mammalian receptors suggest some degree of heterodimerization. We observed that the trout MR confers a several fold lower transcriptional activity compared to the trout GRs. This made us question the functional relevance of the MR when this receptor is located in the same cells as the GRs and activated by cortisol. A series of co-transfection experiments using different glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) containing promoter-reporter constructs were carried out to investigate any possible interaction between the piscine CRs. Co-transfection of the GRs with the MR significantly reduced the total transcriptional activity even at low MR levels, suggesting interaction between these receptors. Co-transfection of GR1 or GR2 with the MR did not affect the subcellular localization of the GRs, and the MR-mediated inhibition seemed to be independent of specific activation or inhibition of the MR. Site-directed mutagenesis of the DNA-binding domain and dimerization interface of the MR showed that the inhibition was dependent on DNA binding but not necessarily on dimerization ability. Thus, we suggest that the interaction between MR and the GRs may regulate the cortisol response in cell types where the receptors co-localize and propose a dominant-negative role for the MR in cortisol-mediated transcriptional activity.

scholarly journals In vitro expression of long and short ovine prolactin receptors: activation of Jak2/STAT5 pathway is not sufficient to account for prolactin signal transduction to the ovine beta-lactoglobulin gene promoter

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bignon ◽  
N Daniel ◽  
L Belair ◽  
J Djiane
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Phosphorylation ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Prolactin Receptors ◽  
Milk Protein Gene ◽  
Prolactin Signaling ◽  
Beta Lactoglobulin

The recent finding that sheep had long (l-oPRLR) and short (s-oPRLR) prolactin receptors provided new tools to further explore prolactin signaling to target genes. Here we used CHO cells transfected with l-oPRLR or s-oPRLR cDNAs to compare the activation of known key steps of prolactin signaling by the two receptors. We found that prolactin stimulated l-oPRLR tyrosine phosphorylation, although it lacked the last tyrosine residue found in other long prolactin receptors. In addition, l-oPRLR and s-oPRLR both responded to prolactin stimulation by (1) Janus kinase 2 (Jak2) tyrosine phosphorylation, (2) DNA-binding activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5), (3) stimulation of transcription from a promoter made of six repeats of STAT5-responsive sequence. However, although it contains STAT5-binding consensus sequences, the ovine beta-lactoglobulin promoter (-4000 to +40) was transactivated by l-oPRLR, but not by s-oPRLR. Taken together, our results indicate that activation of Jak2/STAT5 pathway alone is not sufficient to account for prolactin-induced transcription of this milk protein gene, and that sequences of its promoter, other than STAT5-specific sequences, account for the opposite transcriptional activation capabilities of l-oPRLR and s-oPRLR.

Stable transfer and restricted expression of a cloned class I gene encoding a secreted transplantation-like antigen

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1295-1300
Author(s):  
Y Barra ◽  
K Tanaka ◽  
K J Isselbacher ◽  
G Khoury ◽  
G Jay
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Class I ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Enhancer ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Functional Studies ◽  
I Gene

The identification of a unique major histocompatibility complex class I gene, designated Q10, which encodes a secreted rather than a cell surface antigen has led to questions regarding its potential role in regulating immunological functions. Since the Q10 gene is specifically activated only in the liver, we sought to define the molecular mechanisms which control its expression in a tissue-specific fashion. Results obtained by transfection of the cloned Q10 gene, either in the absence or presence of a heterologous transcriptional enhancer, into a variety of cell types of different tissue derivations are consistent with the Q10 gene being regulated at two levels. The first is by a cis-dependent mechanism which appears to involve site-specific DNA methylation. The second is by a trans-acting mechanism which would include the possibility of an enhancer binding factor. The ability to efficiently express the Q10 gene in certain transfected cell lines offers an opportunity to obtain this secreted class I antigen in quantities sufficient for functional studies; this should also make it possible to define regulatory sequences which may be responsible for the tissue-specific expression of Q10.

scholarly journals Bromodomain protein inhibition: a novel therapeutic strategy in rheumatic diseases

RMD Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e000744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Klein
Keyword(s):  
Animal Models ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Therapeutic Strategy ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Protein Inhibition ◽  
Different Cell Types ◽  
Novel Therapeutic

The reading of acetylation marks on histones by bromodomain (BRD) proteins is a key event in transcriptional activation. Small molecule inhibitors targeting bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins compete for binding to acetylated histones. They have strong anti-inflammatory properties and exhibit encouraging effects in different cell types in vitro and in animal models resembling rheumatic diseases in vivo. Furthermore, recent studies that focus on BRD proteins beyond BET family members are discussed.

scholarly journals HPV-18 E6 Oncoprotein and Its Spliced Isoform E6*I Regulate the Wnt/β-Catenin Cell Signaling Pathway through the TCF-4 Transcriptional Factor

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 3153 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Muñoz-Bello ◽  
Leslie Olmedo-Nieva ◽  
Leonardo Castro-Muñoz ◽  
Joaquín Manzo-Merino ◽  
Adriana Contreras-Paredes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Promote Cell Proliferation ◽  
E6 And E7 ◽  
Hpv 18

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway regulates cell proliferation and differentiation and its aberrant activation in cervical cancer has been described. Persistent infection with high risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is the most important factor for the development of this neoplasia, since E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins alter cellular processes, promoting cervical cancer development. A role of HPV-16 E6 in Wnt/β-catenin signaling has been proposed, although the participation of HPV-18 E6 has not been previously studied. The aim of this work was to investigate the participation of HPV-18 E6 and E6*I, in the regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Here, we show that E6 proteins up-regulate TCF-4 transcriptional activity and promote overexpression of Wnt target genes. In addition, it was demonstrated that E6 and E6*I bind to the TCF-4 (T cell factor 4) and β-catenin, impacting TCF-4 stabilization. We found that both E6 and E6*I proteins interact with the promoter of Sp5, in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, although differences in TCF-4 transcriptional activation were found among E6 intratype variants, no changes were observed in the levels of regulated genes. Furthermore, our data support that E6 proteins cooperate with β-catenin to promote cell proliferation.

Abstract 356: Krueppel-Like Factor 15 Regulates Wnt/β-Catenin Transcription and Controls Cardiac Progenitor Cell Fate in the Postnatal Heart

2012 ◽  
Vol 111 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Noack ◽  
Maria P Zafiriou ◽  
Anke Renger ◽  
Hans J Schaeffer ◽  
Martin W Bergmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Cellular Localization ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Isolated Cells ◽  
Cardiac Progenitor Cell

Wnt/β-catenin signaling controls adult heart remodeling partly by regulating cardiac progenitor cell (CPC) differentiation. We now identified and characterized a novel cardiac interaction of the transcription factor Krueppel-like factor 15 (KLF15) with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling on adult CPCs. In vitro mutation, reporter gene assays and co-localization studies revealed that KLF15 requires two distinct domains for nuclear localization and for repression of β-catenin-mediated transcription. KLF15 had no effect on β-catenin stability or cellular localization, but interacted with its co-factor TCF4, which is required for activation of β-catenin target gene expression. Moreover, increased TCF4 ubiquitination was induced by KLF15. In line with this finding we found KLF15 to interact with the Nemo-like kinase, which was shown to phosphorylate and target TCF4 for degradation. In vivo analyses of adult Klf15 functional knock-out (KO) vs. wild-type (WT) mice showed a cardiac β-catenin-mediated transcriptional activation and reduced TCF4 degradation along with cardiac dysfunction assessed by echocardiography (n=10). FACS analysis of the CPC enriched-population of KO vs. WT mice revealed a significant reduction of cardiogenic-committed precursors identified as Sca1+/αMHC+ (0.8±0.2% vs. 1.8±0.1%) and Tbx5+ (3.5±0.3% vs. 5.2±0.5%). In contrast, endothelial Sca1+/CD31+ cells were significantly higher in KO mice (11.3±0.4% vs. 8.6±0.4%; n≥9). In addition, Sca1+ isolated cells of Klf15 KO showed increased RNA expression of endothelial markers von Willebrand Factor, CD105, and Flk1 along with upregulation of β-catenin target genes. CPCs co-cultured on adult fibroblasts resulted in increased endothelial Flk1 cells and reduction of αMHC and Hand1 cardiogenic cells in KO vs. WT CPCs (n=9). Treating these co-cultures with Quercetin, an inhibitor of nuclear β-catenin, resulted in partial rescue of the observed phenotype. This study uncovers a critical role of KLF15 for the maintenance of cardiac tissue homeostasis. Via inhibition of β-catenin transcription, KLF15 controls cardiomyogenic cell fate similar to embryonic cardiogenesis. This knowledge may provide a tool for activation of endogenous CPCs in the postnatal heart.

Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound Homothorax/Hox/Extradenticle complex

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (22) ◽  
pp. 5137-5148 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.D. Ryoo ◽  
T. Marty ◽  
F. Casares ◽  
M. Affolter ◽  
R.S. Mann
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Trimeric Complex ◽  
Binding Residue ◽  
Dominant Negative Form

To regulate their target genes, the Hox proteins of Drosophila often bind to DNA as heterodimers with the homeodomain protein Extradenticle (EXD). For EXD to bind DNA, it must be in the nucleus, and its nuclear localization requires a third homeodomain protein, Homothorax (HTH). Here we show that a conserved N-terminal domain of HTH directly binds to EXD in vitro, and is sufficient to induce the nuclear localization of EXD in vivo. However, mutating a key DNA binding residue in the HTH homeodomain abolishes many of its in vivo functions. HTH binds to DNA as part of a HTH/Hox/EXD trimeric complex, and we show that this complex is essential for the activation of a natural Hox target enhancer. Using a dominant negative form of HTH we provide evidence that similar complexes are important for several Hox- and exd-mediated functions in vivo. These data suggest that Hox proteins often function as part of a multiprotein complex, composed of HTH, Hox, and EXD proteins, bound to DNA.

Haematotoxicology: Scientific Basis and Regulatory Aspects

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 111-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Gribaldo
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Scientific Basis ◽  
Cancer Drugs ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Clinical Drug Development ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Life Threatening

Haematopoietic tissues are the targets of numerous xenobiotics. The purpose of in vitro haematotoxicology is the prediction of adverse haematological effects from toxicants on human haematopoietic targets under controlled experimental conditions in the laboratory. Building on its foundations in experimental haematology and the wealth of haematotoxicological data found in experimental oncology, this field of alternatives toxicology has developed rapidly during the past decade. Preclinical and clinical drug development for anti-cancer drugs differs from that for other pharmaceuticals, because of the life-threatening nature of the disease. Treatment with anti-cancer drugs at clinically efficacious doses usually induces serious side-effects. The design of preclinical toxicology studies for anti-cancer drugs is intended to identify a safe clinical starting dose, characterise toxicities that could be encountered in human clinical trials, and determine whether these toxicities are reversible, manageable, and predictable. Although the myeloid colony-forming unit (CFU-GM) progenitor is most frequently evaluated, other defined progenitors and stem cells, as well as cell types found in the bone-marrow stroma, can now be evaluated in vitro. Genetic damage to haematopoietic cells can occur in the absence of any overt haematological signs. The development of tissue-specific screening systems that are able to give information about the toxic effects of chemicals, drugs and environmental hazards on target genes is needed, in order to make preliminary decisions or to set priorities for selection among large groups of chemicals and possible drugs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document