Quantification of the coupled motion that occurs with axial rotation and lateral bending of the head-neck complex: An experimental examination

2007 ◽  
Vol 221 (8) ◽  
pp. 913-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Senouci ◽  
D FitzPatrick ◽  
J F Quinlan ◽  
H Mullett ◽  
L Coffey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Regression Equations ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Coupled Motion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Head Neck

The vertebrae of the cervical spine exhibit out-of-plane or coupled motion during axial rotation and lateral bending. Quantifying the range of motion (ROM) of this occurrence can aid the understanding of cervical spine injury mechanisms and disorders, as well as the development of new treatment methods. Previous studies have formulated ratios to describe coupled motion obtained from in-vitro examinations. The aim of the present study was to use in-vivo test data to develop mathematical relationships to quantify the coupled motion that occurs with axial rotation and lateral bending of the head-neck complex. Using a three-dimensional motion analyser it was possible to trace the coupling effect throughout the full range of unrestricted head-neck motion. Values for primary and coupled ROMs were obtained, showing no significant difference between male and female primary ROMs but a small disparity between male and female coupled ROMs. Regression equations were found to quantify coupled motion throughout the range of axial rotation and lateral bending. The present experimental study also examines the range of horizontally fixed axial rotation of the head to determine the minimum amount of coupled lateral bending that takes place, which has not been measured previously.

scholarly journals Computerized Tomographic Morphometric Analysis of the Cervical Spine

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 250-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
DS Evangelopoulos ◽  
P Kontovazenitis ◽  
S Kouris ◽  
X Zlatidou ◽  
LM Benneker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Morphometric Study ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Cervical Canal ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Transverse Foramen ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Canal Diameter ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Detailed knowledge of cervical canal and transverse foramens’ morphometry is critical for understanding the pathology of certain diseases and for proper preoperative planning. Lateral x-rays do not provide the necessary accuracy. A retrospective morphometric study of the cervical canal was performed at the authors’ institution to measure mean dimensions of sagittal canal diameter (SCD), right and left transverse foramens’ sagittal (SFD) and transverse (TFD) diameters and minimum distance between spinal canal and transverse foramens (dSC-TF) for each level of the cervical spine from C1-C7, using computerized tomographic scans, in 100 patients from the archives of the Emergency Room. Results: Significant differences for SCD were detected between C1 and the other levels of the cervical spine for both male and female patients. For the transverse foramen, significant differences in sagittal diameters were detected at C3, C4, C5 levels. For transverse diameters, significant differences at C3 and C4 levels. A significant difference of the distance between the transverse spinal foramen and the cervical canal was measured between left and right side at the level of C3. This difference was equally observed to male and female subjects. Conclusion: CT scan can replace older conventional radiography techniques by providing more accurate measurements on anatomical elements of the cervical spine that could facilitate diagnosis and preoperative planning, thus avoiding possible trauma to the vertebral arteries during tissue dissection and instrument application.

scholarly journals Comparison of the efficacy of three cervical collars in restricting cervical range of motion: A randomized study

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Guk Kim ◽  
Sung Hwan Bang ◽  
Gu Hyun Kang ◽  
Yong Soo Jang ◽  
Wonhee Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Cervical Immobilization ◽  
The Difference

Background: The cervical collar has been used as a common device for the initial stabilization of the cervical spine. Although many cervical collars are commercially available, there is no consensus on which offers the greatest protection, with studies showing considerable variations in their ability to restrict cervical range of motion. The use of the XCollar (Emegear, Carpinteria, CA) has been known to decrease the risk of spinal cord injury by minimizing potential cervical spinal distraction. We compared XCollar with two other cervical collars commonly used for adult patients with cervical spine injury to evaluate the difference in effectiveness between the three cervical collars to restrict cervical range of motion. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the difference between the three cervical collars in their ability to restrict cervical range of motion. Method: A total of 30 healthy university students aged 21–25 years participated in this study. Participants with any cervical disease and symptoms were excluded. Three cervical collars were tested: Philadelphia® Collar, Stifneck® Select™ Collar, and XCollar. A digital camera and an image-analysis technique were used to evaluate cervical range of motion during flexion, extension, bilateral bending and bilateral axial rotation. Cervical range of motion was evaluated in both the unbraced and braced condition. Results: XCollar permitted less than a mean of 10° of movement during flexion, extension, bilateral bending and bilateral axial rotation. This was less than the movement permitted by the other two cervical collars. Conclusion: XCollar presented superior cervical immobilization compared to the other two commonly used cervical collars in this study. Thus, when cervical collar is considered for an adult patient with cervical spine injury, XCollar might be one of the considerate options as a cervical immobilization device.

Biomechanical Comparison of Vertbroplasty, Kyphoplasty, Vertebrae Stent for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures -A Finite Element Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen-Chung Liao ◽  
Michael Jian-Wen Chen ◽  
Tung-Yi Lin ◽  
Weng-Pin Chen
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Compressive Force ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Von Mises ◽  
Von Mises Stresses

Abstract Vertebroplasty (VP), balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), and vertebral stent (VS) are usually used for osteoporotic compression fracture. However, these procedures may pose risks of secondary adjacent level fractures. This study simulates finite element models of osteoporotic compression fractures treated with VP, BKP, and VS. Vertebral resection method was used to simulate vertebra fracture with Young’s modulus set at 70 MPa to replicate osteoporosis. A compressive force of 1000N was applied on the T11 vertebra while the L1 vertebra were fully constrained as boundary condition. Moment loadings of 4.2 N-m in flexion, 1.0 N-m in extension, 2.6 N-m in lateral bending, and 3.4 N-m in axial rotation were applied. The VS model had the highest von Mises stresses on the bone cement under all different loading conditions (flexion/5.91 Mpa; extension/3.74 Mpa; lateral bending/3.12 Mpa; axial rotation/3.54 Mpa). The stress distribution and maximum von Mises stresses of the adjacent segments, T11 inferior endplate and L1 superior endplate, showed no significant difference among three surgical models. The postoperative T12 stiffness for VP, BKP, and VS are 2898.48 N/mm, 4123.18 N/mm, and 4690.34 N/mm, respectively. VS is the most effective surgical method to maintain vertebral body height without significantly increasing the risks of adjacent fracture.

scholarly journals Biomechanical Comparison of Vertebroplasty, Kyphoplasty, Vertebrae Stent for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures—A Finite Element Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 5764
Author(s):  
Jen-Chung Liao ◽  
Michael Jian-Wen Chen ◽  
Tung-Yi Lin ◽  
Weng-Pin Chen
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Von Mises ◽  
Von Mises Stresses ◽  
Osteoporotic Compression Fractures

Vertebroplasty (VP), balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), and vertebral stent (VS) are usually used for treating osteoporotic compression fractures. However, these procedures may pose risks of secondary adjacent level fractures. This study simulates finite element models of osteoporotic compression fractures treated with VP, BKP, and VS Vertebral resection method was used to simulate vertebra fracture with Young’s modulus set at 70 MPa to replicate osteoporosis. A follower load of (1175 N for flexion, and 500 N for all others) was applied in between vertebral bodies to simulate the muscle force. Moment loadings of 7.5 N-m in flexion, extension, lateral bending, axial rotation were applied respectively. The VS model had the highest von Mises stresses on the bone cement under all different loading conditions (flexion/5.91 MPa; extension/3.74 MPa; lateral bending/3.12 MPa; axial rotation/3.54 MPa). The stress distribution and maximum von Mises stresses of the adjacent segments, T11 inferior endplate and L1 superior endplate, showed no significant difference among three surgical models. The postoperative T12 stiffness for VP, BKP, and VS are 2898.48 N/mm, 4123.18 N/mm, and 4690.34 N/mm, respectively. The VS model led to superior surgical vertebra stiffness without significantly increasing the risks of adjacent fracture.

In Vitro Study of the C2-C7 Sheep Cervical Spine

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole A. DeVries ◽  
Anup A. Gandhi ◽  
Douglas C. Fredericks ◽  
Joseph D. Smucker ◽  
Nicole M. Grosland
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Biomechanical Responses ◽  
Experimental Biomechanics

Due to the limited availability of human cadaveric specimens, animal models are often utilized for in vitro studies of various spinal disorders and surgical techniques. Sheep spines have similar geometry, disc space, and lordosis as compared to humans [1,2]. Several studies have identified the geometrical similarities between the sheep and human spine; however these studies have been limited to quantifying the anatomic dimensions as opposed to the biomechanical responses [2–3]. Although anatomical similarities are important, biomechanical correspondence is imperative to understand the effects of disorders, surgical techniques, and implant designs. Some studies [3–5] have focused on experimental biomechanics of the sheep cervical functional spinal units (FSUs). Szotek and colleagues [1] studied the biomechanics of compression and impure flexion-extension for the C2-C7 intact sheep spine. However, to date, there is no comparison of the sheep spine using pure flexion-extension, lateral bending, or axial rotation moments for multilevel specimen. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct in vitro testing of the intact C2-C7 sheep cervical spine.

scholarly journals Analysis of remaining motion using one innovative upper airway opening cervical collar and two traditional cervical collars

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias K. Jung ◽  
Gregor V. R. von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt ◽  
Holger Keil ◽  
Paul A. Grützner ◽  
Niko R. E. Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Cervical Collar ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Airway Opening ◽  
Human Cadavers ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Immobilization Techniques

AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare the remaining motion of an immobilized cervical spine using an innovative cervical collar as well as two traditional cervical collars. The study was performed on eight fresh human cadavers. The cervical spine was immobilized with one innovative (Lubo Airway Collar) and two traditional cervical collars (Stifneck and Perfit ACE). The flexion and lateral bending of the cervical spine were measured using a wireless motion tracker (Xsens). With the Weinman Lubo Airway Collar attached, the mean remaining flexion was 20.0 ± 9.0°. The mean remaining flexion was lowest with the Laerdal Stifneck (13.1 ± 6.6°) or Ambu Perfit ACE (10.8 ± 5.8°) applied. Compared to that of the innovative Weinmann Lubo Airway Collar, the remaining cervical spine flexion was significantly decreased with the Ambu Perfit ACE. There was no significant difference in lateral bending between the three examined collars. The most effective immobilization of the cervical spine was achieved when traditional cervical collars were implemented. However, all tested cervical collars showed remaining motion of the cervical spine. Thus, alternative immobilization techniques should be considered.

Effect of Facetectomy on the Three-Dimensional Biomechanical Properties of the Fourth Canine Cervical Functional Spinal Unit: A Cadaveric Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (06) ◽  
pp. 430-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja Bösch ◽  
Martin Hofstetter ◽  
Alexander Bürki ◽  
Beatriz Vidondo ◽  
Fenella Davies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Biomechanical Properties ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Coupled Motion ◽  
Functional Spinal Unit ◽  
Flexion Extension

Abstract Objective To study the biomechanical effect of facetectomy in 10 large breed dogs (>24 kg body weight) on the fourth canine cervical functional spinal unit. Methods Canine cervical spines were freed from all muscles. Spines were mounted on a six-degrees-of-freedom spine testing machine for three-dimensional motion analysis. Data were recorded with an optoelectronic motion analysis system. The range of motion wasdetermined inall threeprimary motionsaswellasrange of motion of coupled motions on the intact specimen, after unilateral and after bilateral facetectomy. Repeated-measures analysis of variance models were used to assess the changes of the biomechanical properties in the three treatment groups considered. Results Facetectomy increased range of motion of primary motions in all directions. Axial rotation was significantly influenced by facetectomy. Coupled motion was not influenced by facetectomy except for lateral bending with coupled motion axial rotation. The coupling factor (coupled motion/primary motion) decreased after facetectomy. Symmetry of motion was influenced by facetectomy in flexion–extension and axial rotation, but not in lateral bending. Clinical Significance Facet joints play a significant role in the stability of the cervical spine and act to maintain spatial integrity. Therefore, cervical spinal treatments requiring a facetectomy should be carefully planned and if an excessive increase in range of motion is expected, complications should be anticipated and reduced via spinal stabilization.

scholarly journals Biomechanical analysis of occipitocervical stabilization techniques: emphasis on integrity of osseous structures at the occipital implantation sites

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-147
Author(s):  
Bryan W. Cunningham ◽  
Kyle B. Mueller ◽  
Kenneth P. Mullinix ◽  
Xiaolei Sun ◽  
Faheem A. Sandhu
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Testing ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Implantation Sites

OBJECTIVEThe objective of the current study was to quantify and compare the multidirectional flexibility properties of occipital anchor fixation with conventional methods of occipitocervical screw fixation using nondestructive and destructive investigative methods.METHODSFourteen cadaveric occipitocervical specimens (Oc–T2) were randomized to reconstruction with occipital anchors or an occipital plate and screws. Using a 6-degree-of-freedom spine simulator with moments of ± 2.0 Nm, initial multidirectional flexibility analysis of the intact and reconstructed conditions was performed followed by fatigue loading of 25,000 cycles of flexion-extension (x-axis, ± 2.0 Nm), 15,000 cycles of lateral bending (z-axis, ± 2.0 Nm), and 10,000 cycles of axial rotation (y-axis, ± 2.0 Nm). Fluoroscopic images of the implantation sites were obtained before and after fatigue testing and placed on an x-y coordinate system to quantify positional stability of the anchors and screws used for reconstruction and effect, if any, of the fatigue component. Destructive testing included an anterior flexural load to construct failure. Quantification of implant, occipitocervical, and atlantoaxial junction range of motion is reported as absolute values, and peak flexural failure moment in Newton-meters (Nm).RESULTSAbsolute value comparisons between the intact condition and 2 reconstruction groups demonstrated significant reductions in segmental flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motion at the Oc–C1 and C1–2 junctions (p < 0.05). The average bone mineral density at the midline keel (1.422 g/cm3) was significantly higher compared with the lateral occipital region at 0.671 g/cm3 (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the occipital anchor and plate treatments in terms of angular rotation (degrees; p = 0.150) or x-axis displacement (mm; p = 0.572), but there was a statistically significant difference in y-axis displacement (p = 0.031) based on quantitative analysis of the pre- and postfatigue fluoroscopic images (p > 0.05). Under destructive anterior flexural loading, the occipital anchor group failed at 90 ± 31 Nm, and the occipital plate group failed at 79 ± 25 Nm (p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONSBoth reconstructions reduced flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at the occipitocervical and atlantoaxial junctions, as expected. Flexural load to failure did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups despite occipital anchors using a compression-fit mechanism to provide fixation in less dense bone. These data suggest that an occipital anchor technique serves as a biomechanically viable clinical alternative to occipital plate fixation.

scholarly journals Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae: comparison of fixation strength between the traditional trajectory and a cortical bone trajectory

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 910-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keitaro Matsukawa ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yato ◽  
Hideaki Imabayashi ◽  
Naobumi Hosogane ◽  
Takashi Asazuma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Fixation Strength ◽  
Isthmic Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Pullout Strength ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension

OBJECTIVE In the management of isthmic spondylolisthesis, the pedicle screw system is widely accepted surgical strategy; however, there are few reports on the biomechanical behavior of pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae. The purpose of the present study was to compare fixation strength between pedicle screws inserted through the traditional trajectory (TT) and those inserted through a cortical bone trajectory (CBT) in spondylolytic vertebrae by computational simulation. METHODS Finite element models of spondylolytic and normal vertebrae were created from CT scans of 17 patients with adult isthmic spondylolisthesis (mean age 54.6 years, 10 men and 7 women). Each vertebral model was implanted with pedicle screws using TT and CBT techniques and compared between two groups. First, fixation strength of a single screw was evaluated by measuring axial pullout strength. Next, vertebral fixation strength of a paired-screw construct was examined by applying forces simulating flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation to vertebrae. RESULTS Fixation strengths of TT screws showed a nonsignificant difference between the spondylolytic and the normal vertebrae (p = 0.31–0.81). Fixation strength of CBT screws in the spondylolytic vertebrae demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in pullout strength (21.4%, p < 0.01), flexion (44.1%, p < 0.01), extension (40.9%, p < 0.01), lateral bending (38.3%, p < 0.01), and axial rotation (28.1%, p < 0.05) compared with those in the normal vertebrae. In the spondylolytic vertebrae, no statistically significant difference was observed for pullout strength between TT and CBT (p = 0.90); however, the CBT construct showed lower vertebral fixation strength in flexion (39.0%, p < 0.01), extension (35.6%, p < 0.01), lateral bending (50.7%, p < 0.01), and axial rotation (59.3%, p < 0.01) compared with the TT construct. CONCLUSIONS CBT screws are less optimal for stabilizing the spondylolytic vertebra due to their lower fixation strength compared with TT screws.

Prediction of in vivo lower cervical spinal loading using musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics model during the head flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation

2018 ◽  
Vol 232 (11) ◽  
pp. 1071-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Diao ◽  
Hua Xin ◽  
Zhongmin Jin
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Spinal Loading ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Body Dynamics ◽  
Head Flexion ◽  
Multi Body

Cervical spine diseases lead to a heavy economic burden to the individuals and societies. Moreover, frequent post-operative complications mean a higher risk of neck pain and revision. At present, controversy still exists for the etiology of spinal diseases and their associated complications. Knowledge of in vivo cervical spinal loading pattern is proposed to be the key to answer these questions. However, direct acquisition of in vivo cervical spinal loading remains challenging. In this study, a previously developed cervical spine musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics model was utilized for spinal loading prediction. The in vivo dynamic segmental contributions to head motion and the out-of-plane coupled motion were both taken into account. First, model validation and sensitivity analysis of different segmental contributions to head motion were performed. For model validation, the predicted intervertebral disk compressive forces were converted into the intradiskal pressures and compared with the published experimental measurements. Significant correlations were found between the predicted values and the experimental results. Thus, the reliability and capability of the cervical spine model was ensured. Meanwhile, the sensitivity analysis indicated that cervical spinal loading is sensitive to different segmental contributions to head motion. Second, the compressive, shear and facet joint forces at C3–C6 disk levels were predicted, during the head flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Under the head flexion/extension movement, asymmetric loading patterns of the intervertebral disk were obtained. In comparison, symmetrical typed loading patterns were found for the head lateral bending and axial rotation movements. However, the shear forces were dramatically increased during the head excessive extension and lateral bending. Besides, a nonlinear correlation was seen between the facet joint force and the angular displacement. In conclusion, dynamic cervical spinal loading was both intervertebral disk angle-dependent and level-dependent. Cervical spine musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics model provides an attempt to comprehend the in vivo biomechanical surrounding of the human head-neck system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document