scholarly journals PUBLIC CONTROL OVER ACTIVITY OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2016 ◽  
Vol 0 (6) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Alexander Borisovich Khramtsov ◽  
Natalya Aleksandrovna Bezmenova
Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 68-76
Author(s):  
S. A. Lubennikova

The article is devoted to topical issues of determining the effectiveness of the work of governmental agencies in the Russian Federation. The relevance of the study’s subject matter is determined by the lack of comprehensive examination of the subject matter from the perspective of methodology and practice. Public authorities’ activities in the Russian Federation are changing acquiring new qualities. Thus, clear and uniform criteria for their assessment are necessary. Evaluation criteria should be closer to social indicators and should meet the demands of society. The author analyzes the normative-legal regulation of this issue. to this end, the paper provides examination of the Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation that have been issued since 2007 to establishing indicators for assessing the effectiveness of the activities of the executive authorities of the Russian Federation. It is possible to observe a constant change in the methodological approach to the number, formulation and content of the criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Between 2007 and 2012, the evaluation criteria were based on public control over the public services effectiveness exercised by citizens. Currently, the approach has changed — public control has been removed from the system under consideration and is now governed by a separate regulatory act. For the first time, to recognize executive authorities’ activities as effective the determination of the level of evaluation criteria to be met by executive authorities is used.The normative regulation of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the executive power at the federal level is also investigated. At the national level there is no any regulatory framework for assessing the activities of federal executive authorities of the Russian Federation. The author draws conclusions about the lack of a uniform approach to the evaluation of governmental authorities’ activities at both federal and regional levels. The conclusions can be used in law-making activities of state bodies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Bakhtairova

The article carries out a study of the current status of public councils in the executive authorities of the Russian Federation entities. Public councils appeared in 2014 as an instrument of public control, but during five years of their existence they failed to become an effective instrument of openness and accountability of the authorities to the civil society institutions. The article examines the experts opinions and the results of investigating the practice of public councils by the All-Russian Popular Front in the Russian Federation entities. The author analyzes the issue of motives and incentives of public councils members which are called upon to perform control of the activities of public authorities on a voluntary basis, brings forth the data on citizens involvement in volunteer activities. The analysis of the literature devoted to volunteers shows that this activity involves mainly young people. As they grow up, while keeping an active civil position, it is young people who can become participants of the public control and express their civil position exactly in this way, without the use of protest activity.


Author(s):  
Konstantin Valer'evich Vostrikov ◽  
Yatsek Zalesny ◽  
Ivan Sergeevich Pavlov ◽  
Sergei Vital'evich Skladchikov ◽  
Denis Dmitrievich Oblogin ◽  
...  

This article is dedicated to the study of possibility of attribution of the joint-stock companies to the objects of public control in the Russian Federation. The authors believe that the institution of public control manifests as the key legal guarantee for the implementation, protection and defense of the constitutional principles of democracy and public participation in administration of state affairs. However, the implementation of this civil society institution is accompanied by numerous problems, one of which is the definition of the concept and the list of objects of public control. In this regard, the authors explore various approaches towards the question of attribution of joint-stock companies to objects of public control. The article formulates and substantiates the original definition of the concept of “public authorities”, which imply not only authority of the state and local self-governance, but also as the combination of such rights of separate subjects of law, the realization of which directly affects the mechanism of implementation, observation, protection and defense of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a wide range of citizens of the Russian Federation, foreign citizens, stateless persons, legal entities, as well as public authority bodies, including local self-governance. Therefore, it appears that joint-stock companies should be classified as a variety of the objects of public control. However, the possibility of organization and implementation of public control over their activity requires introducing certain amendments to the current legislation.


Author(s):  
Евгений Николаевич Зиньков

В настоящей статье рассматривается процедура правовой регламентации общественного контроля, который предоставляет возможность открыто и доступно осуществлять наблюдение за деятельностью органов государственной власти. В ст. 1 Конституции Российской Федерации отмечается, что Россия - правовое государство, следовательно, обеспечение и защита прав и свобод человека и гражданина является высшей ценностью. Сам общественный контроль, как правило, является отдельной частью и не входит в систему контрольной власти государства, он реализуется, прежде всего, путем самоорганизации граждан. На сегодняшний день в России существует множество нормативных документов, регламентирующих деятельность общественных объединений. В Российской Федерации лица, находящиеся в местах изоляции от общества (подозреваемые, обвиняемые и осужденные), обладают всем комплексом прав, что и другие граждане нашего государства, за исключением тех ограничений, которые были установлены приговором суда и федеральными законами. Ст. 32 Конституции РФ наделяет граждан правом участия в управлении некоторых государственных дел, что и позволяет общественности осуществлять контрольные функции. Однако далеко не все общественные объединения обладают полномочиями по детальному изучению той или иной сферы государственной деятельности, к примеру, средства массовой информации (далее - СМИ) имеют возможность лишь поверхностно осветить деятельность конкретного объекта внимания. Однако это тоже является неким способом общественного контроля, так как позволяет общественности получить определенную информацию об изучаемом феномене. This article discusses the procedure for legal regulation of public control, which provides an opportunity to openly and easily monitor the activities of public authorities. Article 1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation States that Russia is a legal state, therefore, ensuring and protecting human and civil rights and freedoms is the highest value. Public control itself, as a rule, is a separate part and is not included in the system of control power of the state, it is implemented primarily by self-organization of citizens. Today, in Russia there are many regulatory documents regulating the activities of public associations. In the Russian Federation, persons who are in places of isolation from society (suspects, accused and convicted) have all the rights that other citizens of our state have, with the exception of those restrictions that were established by a court verdict and Federal laws. Article 32 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation grants citizens the right to participate in the management of certain state Affairs, which allows the public to exercise control functions. However, not all public associations have the authority to study a particular sphere of state activity in detail.for example, mass media (hereinafter referred to as mass media) can only cover the activities of a specific object of attention. At the same time, this is also a way of public control, since it allows the public to get certain information about the phenomenon being studied.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 135-141
Author(s):  
Ильин ◽  
Viktor Ilin ◽  
Матвеева ◽  
Ekaterina Matveeva

In the article the problems of public control as a factor of correction of activity of public authorities are analyzed. The theoretical approaches characterizing openness of the power as the direction of modernization of public administration are presented. An attempt of the analysis of pluralism of approaches to understanding of essence of public control in scientific literature is made. A number of judgments about improvement directions of public control are expressed.


10.12737/7253 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Арина Лапшина ◽  
Arina Lapshina

The article is devoted to the analysis of interactive forms of public control over the activities of public authorities in subjects of the Russian Federation and analysis of the main problems of their realization. The author comes to a conclusion that the efficiency of the public control in the interactive forms based on activity of subjects of the Russian Federation on building dialogue with citizens, on the use of modern information technologies, as well as on the willingness of the society to participate in the decision-making for State. The author proposes to continue the work on the automation of the processes of realization of public control, to expand the range of public actions of public authorities in subjects of the Russian Federation, in the case of it is possible to conduct control in interactive forms, to construct mechanisms of monitor the activities of public authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation on the problems solving during the process of public control, to guarantee a opportunity of assessment of the citizens timely "response" of the government on such problems.


2021 ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Dmitry A. Аvdeev

The article examines the constitutional foundations of the legitimacy of public authorities, concludes that their activities correspond to the political interests of Russian citizens. The problem of the legitimacy of the activities of public authorities in the Russian Federation and the process of their legitimation, after the constitutional amendments, acquired particular relevance. Participation in the management of state affairs is determined by the peculiarities of the modern system of organization of power, as well as the ability of citizens to influence the functioning of the activities of its bodies, which makes it possible to determine the degree of legitimacy of public administration. The author, analyzing the existing structure of public authorities through the prism of the legitimacy of their activities, identifies some problems of an organizational nature and suggests ways of solving them in this regard.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ksenia Minakova

The article analyzes methods of ensuring the migrants rights by the public authorities of the Russian Federation, the individual elements of the migration policy of the Russian Federation relating to the activities of public authorities. It considers the activities in the field of protection of the migrants rights by such authorities as the Russian President's Office for Constitutional Rights of Citizens, the Presidential Council for Civil Society and Human Rights, the Council for Interethnic Relations, General Directorate for Migration, Chief Directorate for Migration Issues of Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, their normative documents, that regulate their activities. It examines separately the activities of the RF Government in the field of protection of the migrants rights, as well as judicial authorities; it identifies the special role of the RF Constitutional Court in the field of ensuring the rights of migrants, refugees, the internally displaced and stateless persons. It underlines the role of authority bodies of the RF entities in ensuring the migrants rights in terms of Irkursk Oblast. The article offers to differentiate strictly the role of each authority body in the field of migrants rights protection, as well as to pay specific attention to regulation of activities of the FR entities authority bodies in this direction.


Author(s):  
O.V. Loginovskiy ◽  
◽  
A.S. Khaldin ◽  
A.A. Shinkarev ◽  
◽  
...  

It is shown that in connection with the ongoing financial and economic crises in the world, as well as a sharp aggravation of competition in the international markets of industrial products and a number of other factors, the issues of increasing the efficiency of industrial enterprises and corporations in the regions of the country need a more comprehensive and comprehensively thought-out justifica-tion. Purpose of the study. It is advisable to develop a set of scientific provisions and recommenda-tions for the analysis of the activities of industrial enterprises in the regions, which would contribute to the purposeful development of the economy of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in modern business conditions. Materials and methods. The materials and methods used are out-lined by the content of theoretical developments and practical experience obtained in the process of researching the development of the economy and industry of the regions of the Russian Federation. Results. The list of scientific provisions and recommendations for increasing the effectiveness of the influence of state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation on the develop-ment of industry and economy of the country's regions has been substantiated. The composition of methods of state regulation in the economy and industry of the regions is presented, a list of the main tasks of the industrial and economic block for state authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as the functions and mechanisms of their implementation, is pre-sented. Conclusion. The development of the economy and industry of the regions of Russia should be carried out using the scientific provisions and recommendations presented in this article, which will allow, when forming management decisions, to take into account factors and justifications that were often unused before.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document