Intellectual Property as a Significant Factor of Post-Industrial Economic Development

10.12737/2613 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Левкина ◽  
Nataliya Levkina

Postindustrial economic order is described with the emphasis on its specific features based on already changed role of knowledge and information. The postindustrial economic model is characterized by (a) the crucial importance of intangible production factors, (b) service industries, (c) creative character of work, pivotal changes in production technologies as well as by (d) production factors interrelation. In the postindustrial society key prerequisites of economic growth are scientific and technological advance, and intellectualization of major production factors. Private property and monetary capital are substituted by intellectual property and intellectual capital. Intellectual potential of an enterprise can be enhanced primarily via creation of new subjects of intellectual property. The author concludes, that it is necessary to encourage economic entities to create and exploit intellectual property which is of paramount significance for the successful transformation of this country’s economy.

Author(s):  
Volodymyr Virchenko ◽  
Yuliia Pakhaieva

The article is devoted to the study of the nature, features and significance of intellectual property in modern economic systems. The role of intellectual property in stimulating the development of the national economy and changing its specialization in the post-industrial era is analyzed. Authors underlined the fact that Ukraine faces the problem of changing economic specialization in the context of post-industrial transformations in order to ensure an advantageous position in the global competitive environment. The analysis shows that EU countries and the US are trying to export finished products with a high share of value added, while most of Ukraine's export basket is made up of raw materials, which gives our country a losing position in the global economic environment. The role of commercialization of intellectual property and investments in intellectual capital in the structural transformation of the economic system and the formation of the post-industrial system of production is substantiated. The impact of knowledge, information, innovations and intellectual property on the economic growth and competitiveness of the country in modern globalized consumer markets has been investigated. South Korea's experience in the commercialization of intellectual property and the formation of an effective model of specialization is considered. Results of research demonstrated that distinguishing tools as a component of intangible assets of enterprises turned into important factor of its competitiveness in the context of post-industrial transformations. China's experience in supporting the commercialization of intellectual property by creating industrial parks that accumulate foreign direct investment is studied. Analysis of statistics has proved key role of intellectual property in the modern system of public reproduction, and allows to identify a clear link between the volume and dynamics of investment in intellectual capital and profitability of innovative enterprises. The necessity to implement the state policy aimed at changing the economic specialization of Ukraine in the direction of forming a favorable institutional environment for the implementation of innovative and technological potential has been substantiated.


Author(s):  
A. Belozorova ◽  
N. Korovina

The article examines the relationship between educational and intellectual migration on the example of Ukraine. It is noted that usually educational migration is considered as a separate form of migration, it is associated with the stage of formation and accumulation of intellectual potential. While intellectual migration, traditionally understood as the relocation of workers of intellectual labor and creative intelligentsia, is associated with the stage of use of intellectual capital. Therefore, these two streams have so far been considered separately. In order to better understand the current role of educational migration, the processes of departure of Ukrainian students abroad and receiving educational services by foreign students in the domestic economy are considered. The paper also identifies the main directions and scales of educational migration flows in the country. The role of universities as institutions for attracting the intellectual potential of foreign countries to recipient countries in order to increase their competitiveness in the further development of the knowledge economy in the global dimension is substantiated. Based on the analysis of assessments of the causes and factors of the outflow of young people from Ukraine to study, it is substantiated that the quality of education is not the main value that students are looking for. It is found that in the current conditions of economic, political and military crisis, their main motive is emigration to a permanent place of residence in more politically stable and economically successful countries. The existence of a serious problem of lack of proper methods of data collection and statistical analysis in the field of educational and intellectual migration is emphasized, the data of official statistics are incomplete and do not reflect the whole picture of educational and intellectual migration. The benefits of educational immigration are identified and described, as well as the losses of the Ukrainian economy from the outflow of intellectual capital in the form of educational migration and the departure of highly qualified personnel. It is concluded that to change the situation it requires an effective migration policy, which should include the interests of the country's economy based on the acquired knowledge of migrants obtained abroad. The ultimate goal should be the introduction of an effective mechanism for the free movement of migrants and the transformation of irreversible emigration into temporary, because stopping migration in the context of globalization is an impossible phenomenon.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Ziuzia ◽  

The dependence of competitiveness of Ukraine and its economic system on the formation and effective use of the intellectual potential of economic entities at the stage of information and digital society has been considered. The process of the formation, use and management of intellectual potential has been presented, in which the evaluation of the intellectual potential of enterprises is considered as an important factor of increasing the efficiency of the intellectual potential of the national economy. The special role and significance of the intellectual potential for the development of modern enterprises in the period of crisis for the national economy during the COVID-19 pandemic have been determined. Theoretical and methodological aspects of its evaluation have been studied and the methodological principles of assessing the value of intellectual property as the most important structural component of the IP have been considered. The theoretical and methodological task of revealing the essence of intellectual capital as an economic category, features of its structural components, as elements of a comprehensive assessment of intellectual potential as well as their relationship with intellectual capital and intellectual resources have been considered. Particular emphasis has been placed on the most important structural component of intellectual capital and intellectual potential of economic entities – objects of intellectual property rights and peculiarities of their evaluation principles of the intellectual potential of enterprises. In order to solve these important tasks, the system approach and such methods of analysis as generalization and analogy have been used. It has been proved that in order to create sustainable competitive advantages that depend primarily on the effectiveness of intellectual potential of economic entities, an important component of development strategy should be the implementation of mechanisms for evaluating intellectual potential, which will have a significant impact on the national economy at the current stage of the development of society.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-39
Author(s):  
Volodymyr Virchenko ◽  
Yurii Petrunia ◽  
Valerii Osetskyi ◽  
Mykhaylo Makarenko ◽  
Valentyna Sheludko

This paper investigates the role of intellectual property in the modern post-industrial economy and its intensive commercialization of the country's competitive advantages in the global economic environment. The main purpose of the research is to prove the hypothesis about the crucial role of intellectual property development in ensuring expanded public reproduction and facilitating the global competitiveness of national economies through innovative modernization of production. To gain the research aim, the authors used a combination of theoretical synthesis and comprehensive statistical analysis. The study follows a deductive approach and theoretical background analysis followed by quantitative research of statistical data. It allowed arriving essential conclusions concerning the role of intellectual property in strengthening the global competitiveness of the national economy and practical policy implications regarding stimulating intellectual property commercialization within the national economy. Paper investigates transmission mechanisms that represent the impact of intensive commercialization of intellectual property on public reproduction and competitiveness of the national economy. Commercialization of intellectual property, defined as a range of activities envisaged for rapid implementation of intellectual activity, resulted in economic turnover to obtain strategic competitive advantages and generate economic profit supported by the transformation of intellectual property into intellectual capital used for the manufacturing of innovative, highly marginal products. Comprehensive statistical data analysis was conducted using quantitative methods (cluster analysis and principal components analysis). The findings proved the key role of intellectual property in the modern system of public reproduction. They demonstrated the multiplicative impact of intellectual property development on a country's competitive global economic environment. Obtained research results provided the basis for policy implications concerning the development of commercialization of intellectual property and stimulation of expanded reproduction of intellectual capital in Ukraine as a precondition of innovative modernization of national industries and acquiring strategic competitive advantages in a globalized market.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1367-1371
Author(s):  
A. S. Shatrovskaya

Aim. The presented study aims to examine international experience and current domestic practices to develop scientifically grounded proposals for Russia’s transition towards a post-industrial economic system based on the integration between the real sector and the high-tech services sector in the context of globalization.Tasks. The authors analyze the classical foundations of the post-industrial economic system and develop a mechanism for its formation under modern conditions; determine the key characteristics of the real sector and characterize its relationship with the financial sector and the services sector in the process of building and developing a post-industrial economic system; identify the fundamental problems that hinder Russia’s transition towards a post-industrial economic system; identify the key elements of the modernization of the national economic policy aimed at strengthening innovation susceptibility and transparency, which is an essential prerequisite for the transition towards a postindustrial economic system; justify the need for the formation of a high-tech real sector and its integration with the high-tech services sector within the framework of a systemic production process.Methods. This study critically analyzes the classical concepts of a post-industrial economic system that determines the behavior of economic entities at various levels as well as existing views on the mechanism of its construction. Analytical tools are used to propose a modification of the fundamentals of the transition towards a post-industrial economic system in the context of global competition and economic instability. The related directions of changes in the national economic policy are substantiated and their target function is determined.Results. The study, which is aimed at building a post-industrial economic system, shows the increasing role of the high-tech real sector and its relationship with the high-tech services sector. This allowed the authors to justify the necessity of forming a single conceptual model of the systemic production process that would unite all high-tech sectors of the economy, with the predominant development of the real sector. The implementation of such a model will ensure Russia’s transition towards a post-industrial economic system, taking into account the opportunities and risks introduced by globalization.Conclusions. The prospects for the post-industrial development of the Russian economy and the regulatory role of the government as the manager of post-industrial development on the basis of the increasing role of the real sector are determined.


Intellectual capital is the creation of more wealth by dint of knowledge and knowledge-based processes. The cycle of intellectual capital begins at inner faculties of a human being, in the application of skills, knowledge, experimentation, and research. Thus, it begins at the knowledge level in a person and ends at the creation of capital. This capital is known as intellectual capital. This chapter mainly explains the role of the elements in intellectual capital for open innovative initiatives in business enterprises. Five case illustrations are discussed in open innovation management with the elements of intellectual capital.


10.12737/4871 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Альхименко ◽  
O. Alkhimenko

In recent years and in the nearest future we can observe the increasing role of human capital in the development of modern economy. The main success factor is a human with its capabilities, knowledge and ability to solve the given problems in a creative way. This article suggests an author’s approach to the following issues: intellectual capital and its structure, peculiarities of its use; theoretical aspects of intellectual capital and its assessment on the state level (macro level). Also authors suggest approaches to increase of effectiveness of transformation of intellectual potential into intellectual capital.


2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Mushita ◽  
Carol B. Thompson

The year 2000 was the deadline for developing countries to bring their national laws into compliance with the trade-related intellectual property rights (TRIPS) agreement under the World Trade Organization (WTO). However, the transition to one universal intellectual property law is not proceeding as scripted. After briefly summarizing a long tradition of debate about intellectual property, this article first analyzes what is new and different about TRIPS. It then argues that extending intellectual private property rights to plants, in particular in the form of patents, challenges scientific logic and threatens biodiversity. Southern Africa has also taken this view, and is proposing political and legal alternatives to the patenting of biodiversity. Combining principles from the Convention on Bio logical Diversity and the FAO International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources, draft legislation affirms farmers' and community rights, while not denying the important role of international protocols. The proposal, calling for local and national control, is not only a model for Africa, but for other developing countries to resolve the incongruities between TRIPS and the CBD over the patenting of living organisms.


Author(s):  
Ekaterina Pravilova

This chapter examines the development of copyright in Russia, focusing on one aspect of the debates—the balance of the private interests of the author (as a producer of material and immaterial values) and the interests of society. These debates involved people of different professions—lawyers, journalists, economists, publishers, and literary critics—and encompassed a wide range of problems—cultural reform and Russia's backwardness, the role of intellectual capital in social development, the value of individual freedom, the state's role in the provision of cultural goods, and the importance and protection of private property. It shows that Russian discussions of copyright often masked attempts to provoke significant political and cultural shifts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document