scholarly journals EVALUATION OF KNOWLEDGE EFFECTIVENESS IN THE REAL ECONOMY

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 110-117
Author(s):  
Alzhanat Suleymankadieva

In the present investigation, we created a methodology for the evaluation of knowledge effectiveness of Russian economy. It helps us to assess the real level of readiness of Russian real economy to move to the Knowledge Economy. We evaluated the innovative development of the Russian economy using the following indices: the growth of inventive activity, the share of modern manufacturing and service sector in the GDP, the changes in the  nature of  social behaviour, and the well functioning of the market mechanism. The objective of the analysis was to evaluate the conformance of the Russian economy, in a special reference, to the European Knowledge Economy. We have defined sub indexes which were normalized between zero and one. We evaluated the knowledge effectiveness of Russian economy using European approach for Knowledge Economy. In order to obtain the complex Index of Knowledge Effectiveness, we used the statistical methods to summarize weighted knowledge effectiveness sub indexes by formula Vm = Sφieim. Results showed that this index totaled 0.28 at the maximum possible value of 1. This indicates significant need to create a new effective economic model with different management.

Author(s):  
Ksenia V. Barmina ◽  
◽  
Marina V. Shinkevich ◽  
Farida F. Galimulina ◽  
◽  
...  

The imbalance in the structure of the range of paid services provided to the population, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, requires a flexible approach to management, identification of alternative business methods, and greater adaptation to the needs of the population. This trend determines measures to manage the urban infrastructure of public services, innovation and investment activities aimed at improving the efficiency of economic systems. The purpose of this study is to build a model for managing the development of paid services, taking into account the key factors of development, aimed at identifying the potential for improving the service sector. The goal was achieved by solving the following tasks: to diagnose the innovative development of paid services to the population; to build an economic and mathematical model for the development of paid services; to determine the direction of development of paid services to the population. The research methods used are comparison, analysis, synthesis, system approach, economic and mathematical modeling. The study identified features of innovative development of sphere of services, characterized by less active innovative activity on industrial production driven by economic factors; the model of «Three I» the development of services based on a mathematical relationship of infrastructure investment and innovative way to develop a balanced strategy of development of sphere of paid services to the population in the Russian economy. Based on this model, a set of recommendations can be formed to ensure business flexibility in the service sector in the conditions generated by the COVID-19 pandemic.


2012 ◽  
pp. 48-65
Author(s):  
M. Deryabina

The article studies theoretical and methodological foundations for the organization of the real economy. It analyzes the forms of market coordination in the real sector — the price mechanism and the hierarchy. The article studies the extent to which the organizational institutions of an advanced market economy are comparable to the organization of the real sector of the Russian economy formed during the last two decades. The most important aspects of the research are the factors of the evolution of the major element of the Russian economy under the market transformation, as well as specific characteristics of corporate governance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 06008
Author(s):  
Vladimir Okrepilov ◽  
Natalya Gagulina

The research objective represented in the article was conducting an analysis of long-term transformation of the Russian economy, its manifestations and consequences, a detection of transformations of innovative development and its influence on quality of life of the population. The tasks which are, also, solved in the report: an analysis of the production structure of Russian gross domestic product in terms of the ration of the industries, types of activities in the field of the material production and service sector in an economy. The article highlights the key factors fuelling problems of the quality of life in the terms of an innovative development, the influence of cyclical economic development on structural transformations and quality of life is revealed. The methodological basis for studying the relationship between the innovative development of regions and the quality of life, as well as the practical application of the results obtained, was the economics of quality. The trend of lagging behind in the development of the knowledge economy, the annual decrease in domestic spending on research and development in the Russian economy, may contribute to the strengthening of regional differentiation, further increasing the social stratification of the population due to the fall in real incomes. The application of the methodological principles of the economics of quality makes it possible to use such mechanism for assessing the region’s quality of life of the population, which allows not only to measure and standardize the quality of life indicator, but also to effectively use it for strategic management purposes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 88-95
Author(s):  
Vladimir Rakin

There is no alternative to Russian science in the innovative development of the Russian economy. Without discussing the obvious role of science in the development of defense technologies to protect the country’s borders, under the conditions of sanctions, which inevitably hamper the development of the Russian economy, the reform of science is necessary. The main direction seems to be the creation of a full-fledged applied branch of science with a variety of organizational and legal forms. On this path, the role of education is high. A cardinal mistake in the reform of education was made with the adoption of the Western model of combining education and science. It should be taken into account that fundamental science and education represent different spheres of intellectual activity. But applied science and education are closely linked, if only for the reason that students’ interests in attractive specialties are dictated by the real prospects of the future profession used in Russian industry. The personnel policy of the Government is closely connected with the innovative development of Russia. The bureaucratic power vertical created in the country is not conducive to the entry of professionals in this or that field of knowledge into the circle of top managers. Therefore, the executive energy of managers responsible for scientific innovations is aimed exclusively at achieving the goals of formal competition with other powers, contributing little to the real scientific and technological progress in our country.


Significance The government insists it can ride out broader US and EU sanctions dating from 2014, a view supported by the Standard & Poor's (S&P) rating agency's July assessment that the Russian economy is strong enough to withstand new sanctions. Impacts While its food import ban will continue, Russia's ability to hit back with further counter-sanctions is limited. Sectoral sanctions against banks will trickle down to the real economy, impeding its expansion. Pro-Western, liberal voices will be marginalised as long as sanctions are in place.


Author(s):  
Mykhaylo Zvyeryakov

A theoretical analysis of the crisis of the neoliberal model of globalization, which led to the processes of deindustrialization in many countries of the world, including Ukraine, is presented. It is shown that through the restoration of the development of high-tech sectors of the real economy, a global economic model is changing, that gives a chance to overcome negative consequences of the global crisis. The analysis of various models of capitalism under conditions of neoliberal globalization, including those in the countries emerging in the postsocialist space, has been carried out. It is shown that solving the contradiction that has developed in Ukrainian economy between current and long-term tasks is possible on the basis of a reproductive approach.


Author(s):  
Таир Махаматович Махаматов ◽  
Саида Таировна Махаматова

В статье анализируется процесс изменений направлений и уровней сферы образования, динамичное превращение ее в специфическую отрасль реальной экономики, воспроизводящую интеллектуальный капитал и научную продукцию. В современном мире, динамичном и высококонкурентном, предъявляющим большие требования к профессионализму, умениям и навыкам под конкретные задачи и проблемы, вопрос значимости получения образования в нужных объемах и в нужные сроки стал актуальным. Последние годы структурной перестройки экономик развитых и развивающихся стран, глобальные вызовы (пандемия коронавируса) буквально за считанные месяцы делают одни отрасли убыточными, их специалистов не востребованными, а другие сферы экономики, особенно новые, - более перспективными, в которых уровень зарплат соответственно гораздо выше, чем в других. В таких условиях рынок образования, отрасль обучения, переподготовка специалистов, производство и «продажа» вузами результатов прикладных и фундаментальных научных исследований в качестве специфического товара становятся крайне значимыми и подчас являются единственным фактором развития новых сфер экономики. Цель исследования: обоснование фактора трансформации рынка образования в отдельный элемент или отрасль реального сектора цифровой экономики; выявление взаимодополняемости государственной и частной систем образования; раскрытие роли новых сфер экономики в процессе данной трансформации и доказательство того, что рынок образования интегрируется с новыми сферами экономики, новыми технологиями. В работе использованы методы системного подхода, сравнительного и эконометрического анализа. Практическая значимость исследования заключается в переносе акцента от понимания рынка образования как сферы подготовки кадров для новых сфер экономики к пониманию рынка образования как внутренней составляющей новых сфер экономики. Научная новизна статьи прослеживается в постановке вопроса в другом ракурсе: новые сферы экономики становятся гораздо сложнее любого вида и уровня образования, и данные сферы трансформируют рынок образования, а не наоборот. The article analyzes the process of changes in the directions and levels of education, its dynamic transformation into a specific branch of the real economy, reproducing intellectual capital and scientific products. In the modern world, dynamic and highly competitive, which makes great demands on professionalism, skills and skills for specific tasks and problems, the issue of the importance of obtaining education in the right volumes in the right time has become very relevant. The recent years of structural adjustment of the economies of developed and developing countries, the global challenges (the coronavirus pandemic) in just a matter of months make some industries unprofitable, their specialists not in demand, and other areas of the economy, especially new ones, - more promising, in which the level of salaries is correspondingly much higher than in others. Under such conditions, the education market, the training industry, retraining of specialists, the production and «sale» by the University of the Results of applied and fundamental scientific research as a specific product become extremely significant and sometimes the only factor in the development of new spheres of the economy. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the factor of transformation of the education market into a separate element or industry of the real sector of the digital economy; identifying complementarities between public and private education systems; revealing the role of new spheres of the economy in the process of this transformation and proving that the education market is integrating with new spheres of the economy and new technologies. The work uses methods of the system approach, comparative and econometric analysis. The practical significance of the study lies in shifting the emphasis from understanding the education market as a field of training for new areas of the economy to understanding the education market as an internal component of new areas of the economy. The scientific novelty of the article can be traced in setting the question in another perspective: new areas of the economy become much more complicated than any type and level of education, and these areas transform the education market, and not vice versa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document