scholarly journals A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled Trial Comparing Wound Dressings Used in Hip and Knee Surgery: Aquacel and Tegaderm Versus Cutiplast

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Ravenscroft ◽  
J Harker ◽  
KA Buch
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Wound Dressings ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Hip And Knee Surgery

INTRODUCTION Cutiplast (absorbent perforated dressing with adhesive border; Smith & Nephew) is commonly used following orthopaedic operation, but complications of its use have been reported. A prospective, randomised, controlled study was performed to compare the efficacy of Cutiplast versus an Aquacel (hydrofibre dressing; ConvaTec) covered with Tegaderm (vapour-permeable dressing; 3M). PATIENTS AND METHODS Two-hundred patients were randomised to receive one of the two dressings following elective and non-elective surgery of the hip and the knee. We were able to study 183 patients. The condition of the wound and any complications such as skin blistering or signs of infection was noted as was the frequency of dressing changes. RESULTS The Aquacel and Tegaderm dressing was 5.8 times more likely to result in a wound with no complications as compared to a Cutiplast dressing (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% CI 2.8–12.5; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION Aquacel covered by Tegaderm is a superior dressing to Cutiplast following surgery to the hip and knee.

scholarly journals Feasibility of 3-month melatonin supplementation for brain oxidative stress and sleep in mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e041500
Author(s):  
Zoe Menczel Schrire ◽  
Craig L Phillips ◽  
Shantel L Duffy ◽  
Nathaniel S Marshall ◽  
Loren Mowszowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Brain Oxidative Stress ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionMelatonin has multiple proposed therapeutic benefits including antioxidant properties, synchronisation of the circadian system and lowering of blood pressure. In this protocol, we outline a randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility, acceptability and tolerability of higher dose (25 mg) melatonin to target brain oxidative stress and sleep disturbance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Methods and analysisThe study design is a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. Forty individuals with MCI will be recruited from the Healthy Brain Ageing Clinic, University of Sydney and from the community, and randomised to receive either 25 mg oral melatonin or placebo nightly for 12 weeks. The primary outcomes are feasibility of recruitment, acceptability of intervention and adherence to trial medication at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include the effect of melatonin on brain oxidative stress as measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy, blood pressure, blood biomarkers, mood, cognition and sleep. Outcomes will be collected at 6 and 12 weeks. The results of this feasibility trial will inform a future conclusive randomised controlled trial to specifically test the efficacy of melatonin on modifiable risk factors of dementia, as well as cognition and brain function. This will be the first trial to investigate the effect of melatonin in the population with MCI in this way, with the future aim of using this approach to reduce progression to dementia.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol has been approved by the Sydney Local Health District Ethics Committee (X18-0077). This randomised controlled trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol published in the registry, the International Conference for Harmonisation on Good Clinical Practice and all other applicable regulatory requirements. The findings of the trial will be disseminated via conferences, publications and media, as applicable. Participants will be informed of results of the study at the conclusion of the trial. Eligible authors will include investigators who are involved in the conception and design of the study, the conduct of the trial, the analysis of the results, and reporting and presentation of study findings.Trial registration numberAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTRN 12619000876190).Protocol versionV.8 15 October 2020.

Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade for analgesia after cardiac surgery: a randomised, controlled trial

Perfusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoff G. Lockwood ◽  
Leilani Cabreros ◽  
Dorota Banach ◽  
Prakash P. Punjabi
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Subcutaneous Infusion ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade has been used for analgesia after cardiac surgery, but its efficacy has never been formally tested. Method: Fifty adult patients were enrolled in a double-blind, randomised, controlled study of continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral infusion of 0.5% lidocaine (1 mg.kg-1.hr-1) for analgesia after coronary surgery. Control patients received a subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine at the same rate through catheters inserted at the same locations as the study group. The primary outcome was morphine consumption at 48 hours using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Secondary outcomes included pain, respiratory function, nausea and vomiting. Serum lidocaine concentrations were measured on the first two post-operative days. Results: There was no difference in morphine consumption or in any other outcome measure between the groups. Serum lidocaine concentrations increased during the study, with a maximum of 5.9 mg.l-1. There were no adverse events as a consequence of the study. Conclusion: Bilateral paravertebral infusion of lidocaine confers no advantage over systemic lidocaine infusion after cardiac surgery. Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN13424423 ( https://www.isrctn.com )

A Controlled Trial of Home-Based Acute Psychiatric Services

1993 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Burns ◽  
Alan Beadsmoore ◽  
Ashok V. Bhat ◽  
Andrew Oliver ◽  
Carola Mathers
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
One Year ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Clinical Measures ◽  
Experimental Group

While research has shown community-based psychiatric care to be as good as, or better than, hospital-based care, generalisation to clinical practice has been difficult. This prospective, randomised controlled study examined a community-based approach feasible within NHS conditions. Ninety-four patients were randomly allocated to experimental and 78 to control treatments and followed for one year. The groups were well matched apart from an excess of psychotic control patients. No differences in clinical or social functioning outcome were found. Both groups improved substantially on clinical measures in the first six weeks, with some slow consolidation thereafter. There were three suicides in the control group and one in the experimental group. Access to care was better in the experimental group (93% attended assessment) than in the control group (75% attended assessment).

scholarly journals Study protocol for an open labelled randomised controlled trial of perioperative oral nutrition supplement in breast and colorectal cancer patients undergoing elective surgery

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. X. Wong ◽  
S. T. Chen ◽  
S. H. Ong ◽  
S. Shyam ◽  
P. Kandasami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Normal Diet ◽  
Oral Nutrition ◽  
Nutrition Supplement ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background While it is well established that perioperative use of oral nutrition supplement (ONS) improves nutrition status among severely malnourished surgical cancer patients, the evidence requires further substantiation for non-severely malnourished patients with cancer. This protocol paper presents the rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative as well as an extended 90-day postoperative use of ONS on nutritional and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing elective surgery for breast and colorectal cancer. Methods Patients with primary breast and colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery are recruited from two tertiary hospitals. Eligible patients are assigned into one of the three intervention arms: (i) Group SS will receive ONS in addition to their normal diet up to 14 days preoperatively and postoperatively up to discharge; (ii) Group SS-E will receive ONS in addition to their normal diet up to 14 days preoperatively, postoperatively up to discharge and for an extended 90 days after discharge; and (iii) Group DS will receive ONS in addition to their normal diet postoperatively up to discharge from the hospital. The ONS is a standard formula fortified with lactium to aid in sleep for recovery. The primary endpoints include changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), serum albumin and prealbumin levels, while secondary endpoints are body composition (muscle and fat mass), muscle strength (handgrip strength), energy and protein intake, sleep quality, haemoglobin, inflammatory markers (transferrin, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6), stress marker (saliva cortisol), length of hospital stay and postoperative complication rate. Discussion This trial is expected to provide evidence on whether perioperative supplementation in breast and colorectal cancer patients presenting with high BMI and not severely malnourished but undergoing the stress of surgery would be beneficial in terms of nutritional and clinical outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04400552. Registered on 22 May 2020, retrospectively registered

DHA supplementation in infants born preterm and the effect on attention at 18 months’ corrected age: follow-up of a subset of the N3RO randomised controlled trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erandi Hewawasam ◽  
Carmel T. Collins ◽  
Beverly S. Muhlhausler ◽  
Lisa N. Yelland ◽  
Lisa G. Smithers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Peak Period ◽  
Soya Oil ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
To Receive ◽  
The Brain

Abstract Infants born preterm miss out on the peak period of in utero DHA accretion to the brain during the last trimester of pregnancy which is hypothesised to contribute to the increased prevalence of neurodevelopmental deficits in this population. This study aimed to determine whether DHA supplementation in infants born preterm improves attention at 18 months’ corrected age. This is a follow-up of a subset of infants who participated in the N3RO randomised controlled trial. Infants were randomised to receive an enteral emulsion of high-dose DHA (60 mg/kg per d) or no DHA (soya oil – control) from within the first days of birth until 36 weeks’ post-menstrual age. The assessment of attention involved three tasks requiring the child to maintain attention on toy/s in either the presence or absence of competition or a distractor. The primary outcome was the child’s latency of distractibility when attention was focused on a toy. The primary outcome was available for seventy-three of the 120 infants that were eligible to participate. There was no evidence of a difference between groups in the latency of distractibility (adjusted mean difference: 0·08 s, 95 % CI –0·81, 0·97; P = 0·86). Enteral DHA supplementation did not result in improved attention in infants born preterm at 18 months’ corrected age.

scholarly journals Effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a randomised, controlled study

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (12) ◽  
pp. 1059-1063
Author(s):  
B H K Ng ◽  
I P Tang ◽  
P Narayanan ◽  
R Raman ◽  
R L Carrau
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nasal Lavage ◽  
Nasal Endoscopy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Skull Base Lesions ◽  
Randomised Controlled

AbstractBackgroundNasal lavage with mupirocin has the potential to reduce sinonasal morbidity in endoscopic endonasal approaches for skull base surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.MethodsA pilot randomised, controlled trial was conducted on 20 adult patients who had undergone endoscopic endonasal approaches for skull base lesions. These patients were randomly assigned to cohorts using nasal lavages with mupirocin or without mupirocin. Patients were assessed in the out-patient clinic, one week and one month after surgery, using the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test questionnaire and nasal endoscopy.ResultsPatients in the mupirocin nasal lavage group had lower nasal endoscopy scores post-operatively, and a statistically significant larger difference in nasal endoscopy scores at one month compared to one week. The mupirocin nasal lavage group also showed better Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores at one month compared to the group without mupirocin.ConclusionNasal lavage with mupirocin seems to yield better outcomes regarding patients’ symptoms and endoscopic findings.

scholarly journals Protocol for a randomised, open-label, parallel group, multicentre controlled study to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of Stay Safe Link compared with Stay Safe in patients with end-stage kidney disease on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e024589
Author(s):  
Wen Yao Mak ◽  
Loke Meng Ong ◽  
Bak Leong Goh ◽  
Sunita Bavanandan ◽  
Lily Mushahar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
End Stage

IntroductionPeritonitis is a major complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), the risk of which is significantly influenced by the type of PD transfer system. Although the Y-disconnect and double-bag system is more efficient in preventing peritonitis compared with the spike system, little information is available to differentiate risks between different brands of the Y-disconnect double-bag system. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a newly introduced system is needed to provide the necessary clinical evidence to guide policy decision-making.Methods and analysisThe study is an open-label randomised controlled trial. A total of 434 patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing CAPD will be enrolled and randomised to either the intervention group, Stay Safe Link, or the control group, Stay Safe. All study subjects will be followed up and monitored for 1 year. The primary safety outcome is the rate of peritonitis while the primary efficacy outcomes are the delivered dialysis dose and ultrafiltration volume.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee, National Institute of Health Malaysia. A written informed consent will be obtained from all participating subjects prior to any trial-related procedure and the study conduct will adhere strictly to Good Clinical Practice. The findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT03177031; Pre-results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document