scholarly journals Association of cognitive function with increased risk of cancer death and all-cause mortality: Longitudinal analysis, systematic review, and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0261826
Author(s):  
Somayeh Rostamian ◽  
Saskia le. Cessie ◽  
Koen A. Marijt ◽  
J. Wouter Jukema ◽  
Simon P. Mooijaart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cancer Death ◽  
Lower Performance ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Background Disturbed cognitive function is associated with several causes of mortality; however, the association between cognitive function and the risk of cancer death has not been extensively investigated yet. We aimed to evaluate the association of cognitive function with the risk of cancer death and all-cause mortality in the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) and Leiden 85-plus Study. Additionally, a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies were conducted to evaluate the association of cognitive function and risk of cancer death. Methods Risk of cancer death and all-cause mortality were reported using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in tertiles of cognitive function of PROSPER and Leiden85-Plus Study. Additionally, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycINFO, Academic Search Premier, CINHAL, and Emcare were searched up to November 1st, 2020 to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. The relative risks (RRs) with 95%CI of cancer death per each standard deviation lower performance in cognitive measurements were calculated. Results Participants of PROSPER had 1.65-fold (95%CI 1.11–2.47) greater risk of cancer death (P for trend = 0.016) and 1.85-fold (95%CI 1.46–2.34) higher risk of all-cause mortality (P for trend<0.001), in multivariable models. Results of the Leiden-85 Plus Study showed that subjects with MMSE score below 24 had a lower chance of cancer death (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.36–1.70, P for trend = 0.820) but had 2.18-fold (95%CI 1.57–3.02) higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to the reference group (P for trend<0.001). Besides, the results of systematic review and meta-analysis showed that per each standard deviation lower performance in cognitive function, individuals were at a 10% higher chance of cancer death (RR 1.10, 95%CI 1.00–1.20, P-value = 0.044). Conclusions Lower cognitive function performance is associated with a marginally increased risk of cancer death, in line with a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality.

scholarly journals Association between vitamin D supplementation and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. l4673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Fang Fang ◽  
Jingjing Tang ◽  
Lu Jia ◽  
Yuning Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cancer Death ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Objective To investigate whether vitamin D supplementation is associated with lower mortality in adults. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register from their inception to 26 December 2018. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials comparing vitamin D supplementation with a placebo or no treatment for mortality were included. Independent data extraction was conducted and study quality assessed. A meta-analysis was carried out by using fixed effects and random effects models to calculate risk ratio of death in the group receiving vitamin D supplementation and the control group. Main outcome measures All cause mortality. Results 50 trials with a total of 74 655 participants were identified. Vitamin D supplementation was not associated with all cause mortality (risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.02, I 2 =0%), cardiovascular mortality (0.98, 0.88 to 1.08, 0%), or non-cancer, non-cardiovascular mortality (1.05, 0.93 to 1.18, 0%). Vitamin D supplementation statistically significantly reduced the risk of cancer death (0.85, 0.74 to 0.97, 0%). In subgroup analyses, all cause mortality was significantly lower in trials with vitamin D 3 supplementation than in trials with vitamin D 2 supplementation (P for interaction=0.04); neither vitamin D 3 nor vitamin D 2 was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all cause mortality. Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation alone was not associated with all cause mortality in adults compared with placebo or no treatment. Vitamin D supplementation reduced the risk of cancer death by 15%. Additional large clinical studies are needed to determine whether vitamin D 3 supplementation is associated with lower all cause mortality. Study registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42018117823.

scholarly journals Prediction of all-cause mortality with malnutrition assessed by controlling nutritional status score in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Huiyang Li ◽  
Peng Zhou ◽  
Yikai Zhao ◽  
Huaichun Ni ◽  
Xinping Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Conut Score

Abstract Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association between malnutrition assessed by the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Settings: A comprehensively literature search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed until 30 November 2020. Studies reporting the utility of CONUT score in prediction of all-cause mortality among patients with heart failure were eligible. Patients with a CONUT score ≥2 are grouped as malnourished. Predictive values of the CONUT score were summarized by pooling the multivariable-adjusted risk ratios (RR) with 95 % CI for the malnourished v. normal nutritional status or per point CONUT score increase. Participants: Ten studies involving 5196 patients with heart failure. Results: Malnourished patients with heart failure conferred a higher risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1·92; 95 % CI 1·58, 2·34) compared with the normal nutritional status. Subgroup analysis showed the malnourished patients with heart failure had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (RR 1·78; 95 % CI 1·29, 2·46) and follow-up mortality (RR 2·01; 95 % CI 1·58, 2·57). Moreover, per point increase in CONUT score significantly increased 16% risk of all-cause mortality during the follow-up. Conclusions: Malnutrition defined by the CONUT score is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. Assessment of nutritional status using CONUT score would be helpful for improving risk stratification of heart failure.

scholarly journals Renin-angiotensin system blocker and outcomes of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thorax ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2020-215322
Author(s):  
Hyun Woo Lee ◽  
Chang-Hwan Yoon ◽  
Eun Jin Jang ◽  
Chang-Hoon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor ◽  
Angiotensin System ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Receptor Blockers

BackgroundThe association of ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) with disease severity of patients with COVID-19 is still unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate if ACEI/ARB use is associated with the risk of mortality and severe disease in patients with COVID-19.MethodsWe searched all available clinical studies that included patients with confirmed COVID-19 who could be classified into an ACEI/ARB group and a non-ACEI/ARB group up until 4 May 2020. A meta-analysis was performed, and primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and severe disease.ResultsACEI/ARB use did not increase the risk of all-cause mortality both in meta-analysis for 11 studies with 12 601 patients reporting ORs (OR=0.52 (95% CI=0.37 to 0.72), moderate certainty of evidence) and in 2 studies with 8577 patients presenting HRs. For 12 848 patients in 13 studies, ACEI/ARB use was not related to an increased risk of severe disease in COVID-19 (OR=0.68 (95% CI=0.44 to 1.07); I2=95%, low certainty of evidence).ConclusionsACEI/ARB therapy was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality or severe manifestations in patients with COVID-19. ACEI/ARB therapy can be continued without concern of drug-related worsening in patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Relation between Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Cardiovascular Events and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Wang ◽  
Yangjing Xue ◽  
Saroj Thapa ◽  
Luping Wang ◽  
Jifei Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Macular Degeneration ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Data on the association between age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and cardiovascular disease and mortality are conflicting. The purpose of this report is to conduct a systematic review to better understand the role of AMD as a risk factor for CVD events and mortality. We searched Medline (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) for trials published from 1980 to 2015. We included 20 cohort studies that reported relative risks with 95% confidence intervals for the association of AMD and cardiovascular events and mortality, involving 29,964,334 participants. In a random-effects model, the adjusted RR (95% confidence interval [CI]) associated with AMD was 1.08 (1.00–1.117) for all-cause mortality (8 studies) and 1.18 (0.98–1.43) for cardiovascular disease mortality (5 studies). The pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.17 (0.94–1.45) for coronary heart disease (CHD; 3 studies) and 1.13 (0.93–1.36) for stroke (8 studies). Findings from this systematic review support that AMD is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. The evidence that AMD predicts incident CVD events or CVD mortality remains inclusive and warrants further study in the future.

Significantly Increased Risk of Cancer in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 616-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Noto ◽  
Tetsuro Tsujimoto ◽  
Takehiko Sasazuki ◽  
Mitsuhiko Noda
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

scholarly journals Gender-Related Differences in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pulse ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 38-46
Author(s):  
Angkawipa Trongtorsak ◽  
Natchaya Polpichai ◽  
Sittinun Thangjui ◽  
Jakrin Kewcharoen ◽  
Ratdanai Yodsuwan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phenotypic Expression ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Related Mortality

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Gender-related differences in phenotypic expression and outcomes have been established in many cardiac conditions; however, the impact of gender in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the differences in clinical outcomes between female and male HCM patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to October 2020. Included were cohort studies that compared outcomes of interest including all-cause mortality, HCM-related mortality, and worsening heart failure (HF) or HF hospitalization between male and female. Data from each study were combined using the random effects model to calculate pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eleven retrospective cohort studies with a total of 9,427 patients (3,719 females) were included. Female gender was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (pooled OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.26–2.10, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), HCM-related mortality (pooled OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.08–2.01, <i>p</i> = 0.015), and worsening HF or HF hospitalization (pooled OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.76–2.39, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Female gender was associated with a worse prognosis in HCM. These findings suggest the need for improved care in women including early identification of disease and more possible aggressive management. Moreover, gender-based strategy may benefit in HCM patients.

Abstract 118: Right Bundle Branch Block and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Hazem ◽  
Sunita Sharma ◽  
Amit Sharma ◽  
Cameron Leitch ◽  
Roopalakshmi Sharadanant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Importance: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is observed in approximately 5-14% of patients with heart failure (HF). Multiple observational studies have reported the association of RBBB with clinical outcomes in patients with HF. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of RBBB for patients with HF. Data Sources: We have systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus through January 2014. Study Selection: Reviewers working independently and in duplicate screened all eligible abstracts that described all cause or cardiovascular mortality in patients with RBBB and HF. We excluded studies that reported unadjusted outcome, i.e.: unadjusted event rates. Knowledge synthesis: We pooled reported risk ratio and hazard ratio. Main Outcomes: All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (death). Results: We found 12 relevant observational studies enrolling over 38,000 patients. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Included studies had at least a moderate quality. Seven of those evaluated prognosis of patients with RBBB and heart failure. After a mean follow up period of 2.5 years (range: 1-5 years), RBBB was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to patients with heart failure but no BBB, RR 1.27, 95% CI (1.08-1.50), Figure 1. The other 5 studies evaluated CHF patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), comparing outcomes of patients with RBBB to those with LBBB. After a mean f/u period of 3 years, patients with RBBB were once again found to have an increased risk of all-cause mortality, RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.89. Conclusion and Relevance: RBBB in patients with HF is associated with higher all-cause mortality in comparison to patients without inter-ventricular conduction defects, as well as LBBB patients in patients undergoing CRT setting.

Pre-Eclamptic Pregnancies: An Opportunity to Identify Women at Risk for Future Cardiovascular Disease

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iasmina M Craici ◽  
Steven J Wagner ◽  
Suzanne R Hayman ◽  
Vesna D Garovic
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Later Life ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

Evaluation of: Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ: Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. Med. J. 335(7627), 974 (2007). Evidence has emerged over the years suggesting that women who develop hypertensive pregnancy disorders, most notably pre-eclampsia, are at an increased risk for cardiovascular disease later in life. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed, assessing the future risks of cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality in women with a history of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Women with a history of pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, compared with women without such a history, had an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, including a fourfold increased risk for hypertension, a twofold increased risk for ischemic heart disease, stroke and deep venous thrombosis, and a 1.5-times higher all-cause mortality. The study suggests that affected women may be eligible for preventive therapies at an earlier age, especially if future studies establish the role of pre-eclampsia as an independent cardiovascular risk factor.

scholarly journals Nintedanib, Pirfenidone and Pirfenidone Versus Nintedanib: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler Pitre ◽  
Renata Husnudinov ◽  
Muhammad Faran Khalid ◽  
Melanie C. Zhang ◽  
Sonya Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Drug Effects ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Inverse Variance ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Acute Exacerbations ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background: Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have a poor overall prognosis. Only nintedanib and pirfenidone have been shown to reduce mortality. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of nintedanib, pirfenidone, and pirfenidone vs nintedanib on patient important outcomes. Methods: Randomized trials were retrieved from MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcomes included change in FVC, acute exacerbations and hospitalizations and adverse drug effects leading to discontinuation. We used an inverse variance random effects meta-analysis method to calculate pooled relative risk (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD) and mean difference (MD).Results: A total of 13 studies were included. Both nintedanib [RR 0.63 (0.47,0.85); moderate certainty] and pirfenidone [RR 0.68 (0.47,0.99); moderate certainty] probably reduce all-cause mortality when compared to placebo, but only nintedanib [SMD 0.47 (0.34, 0.60); high certainty] reduces change in FVC. Nintedanib [RR 0.69 (0.48,0.99); moderate certainty],but not pirfenidone probably reduces acute exacerbations or hospitalizations compared to placebo. Compared with placebo, neither nintedanib nor pirfenidone increased risk of drug discontinuation due to adverse effect but there is probably risk of patient drug discontinuation with pirfenidone compared to nintedanib [RR 4.34 (1.72 to 10.98); moderate certainty].Conclusion: Both nintedanib and pirfenidone probably reduce all-cause mortality. Nintedanib is probably more tolerable to pirfenidone in regard to compliance and may be more effective than pirfenidone in reducing mortality rate and in slowing disease progression. Larger head to head randomized trials are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document