scholarly journals How can the major European oil and gas companies continue to be competitive? A comparative analysis between 2000 and 2008

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Othman Cole
Author(s):  
Arina E. Link ◽  
◽  
Mikhail V. Mishenin ◽  

The study compares domestic and foreign companies in the oil and gas sector for the first time and identifies the distinctive features of each group. The results of calculations showed that the profit of any large oil and gas company is affected by revenue, cost of production and the amount of tax deductions. Moreover, the refinancing rate of the country where the company is registered is important for the activities of oil and gas companies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1916-1944
Author(s):  
O.V. Shimko

Subject. The article reviews the production and proved reserves of the largest public oil and gas companies from 2006 to 2018. Objectives. The purpose is to determine key trends in production and proved reserves indicators and identify the factors, leading to this transformation during the studied period. Methods. The study draws on methods of comparative analysis, as well as the generalization of materials of annual financial statements. Results. The paper establishes a proportional increase in the production of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas, and determines that most of the total production accounts for liquid hydrocarbons. It reveals that there has been an increase in proved reserves, and that the component of liquid hydrocarbons in the structure has gradually reached almost two thirds. It is found that in terms of pace, the increase in the production of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas was ahead of the increase in the corresponding proved reserves, as compared to the level of the world's largest public oil and gas corporations, and, therefore, there was a general decrease in the level of reserve life of companies. Conclusions. In conditions of increasing production by leading public oil and gas corporations at available prices for raw materials, it becomes difficult for many independent companies to maintain an acceptable level of availability of proved hydrocarbon reserves.


Author(s):  
Kamila Kulzhanova ◽  
Anastasiya Sheina

Based on the study of scientific and theoretical works of scientists in the field of organisation and human resources management, the authors conducted a comparative analysis of important for the socio-economic situation of states companies, such as “Royal Dutch Shell” and PJSC “LUKOIL”, according to the following criteria: goal, mission, recruitment, incentives, personnel evaluation, and dismissal.


Author(s):  
Victor A. Butenko ◽  
◽  
Mikhail V. Mishenin ◽  

The purposes of this article are to conduct comparative analysis among Russian oil and gas companies. In order to conduct the research economic value–added indicator or EVA was chosen. Scientific novelty is supported by the following points: research gap of EVA application on the Russian oil & gas market, EVA modification for appropriate application for the Russian oil & gas market, nobody has considered entire market (only particular companies), comparative analysis based on EVA calculations. According to the results of the study, companies in the industry differ by orders of magnitude, both in terms of monetary and relative economic value.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Tjernshaugen

This article offers a comparative analysis of the emergence of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) activities and strategies in three multinational oil and gas companies. Exxon/ExxonMobil was first to make plans for a major, pioneering CCS project, but later pursued a relatively cautious strategy. In contrast, BP showed little interest in CCS up until 1997, but from that point on developed a particularly ambitious strategy. Statoil, meanwhile, has been relatively strongly involved in CCS activities for a long time. An explanatory framework with potential for wider application is developed, highlighting how the overall compatibility of CCS with oil and gas industry characteristics created a strategic dilemma for the companies. In explaining their responses, the article emphasizes the process towards institutionalization of CCS as a widely recognized mitigation option, and the three companies' different climate change strategies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 266-272
Author(s):  
Alla Gevorgyan ◽  
Mikhail Mishenin

In this paper the features of the capital structure of oil and gas companies are considered, a comparative analysis of own and borrowed capital of oil and gas companies structures is carried out.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 925-943
Author(s):  
I.V. Filimonova ◽  
◽  
L.V. Eder ◽  
V.Yu. Nemov ◽  
M.V. Mishenin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1291-1312
Author(s):  
N.V. Zyleva

Subject. This article discusses the practice of ensuring the economic security of oil and gas companies operating under the terms of production sharing agreements, where minerals are the object of security. Objectives. The article aims to justify the need to apply professional judgment in the organization of reliable accounting of minerals, explored and extracted under the terms of the production sharing agreement implementation, to avoid various risks to the entity's economic security. Methods. For the study, I used the methods of deduction and modeling. Results. The article presents proposals to arrange accounting of intangible exploration assets (geological information on mineral reserves) and finished products (the part of the extracted minerals owned by the investor and the part owned by the State). Conclusions. As strategic minerals, oil and gas are the targets of various economic risks. Professionals familiar with the specifics of accounting operations in the implementation of the production sharing agreement should be prepared to prevent these risks. The results obtained can be used to design accounting policies and develop local regulations on the tasks and functions of the economic security service of the organization implementing the production sharing agreement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document