Pesticide Residues in Food

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-474
Author(s):  
RICHARD J. JACKSON ◽  
LYNN GOLDMAN

To the Editor.— The Environmental Health Committee of the Northern California Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics is concerned about the finding of pesticide residues in food, particularly the fumigant ethylene dibromide (EDB), which is a known carcinogen in animals and a mutagen in many testing systems, including mammals.1,2 Recently, Gerber Products published a statement, "Ethylene Dibromide Background Information," in their widely disseminated journal Pediatric Basics.3 Gerber rightly states that analytical testing ability has improved during the past 30 years.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. ii-ii
Author(s):  

The Section on Allergy and Immunology was one of the first sections formed (1948) within the American Academy of Pediatrics. It now has almost 600 members. Its objective is to improve the care of children with asthma, allergies, and immunologic disorders. The Section aims to serve as a major informational and educational resource for the 34 000 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The Section sponsors a 2-day scientific program and symposium at each Anual Meeting of the Academy; and, for the past several years, it has also presented a symposium at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Allergy and Immunology, as well as the annual "Synopsis Book." Other educational activities by the Section include publishing position papers (most recently, "Exercise and the Asthmatic Child"), assisting the National Asthma Education Task Force of the National Institutes of Health, and developing informational pamphlets for patients. In addition, the Section sponsors visiting professorship programs to medical schools which do not have a division of pediatric allergy and immunology. The membership of the Section on Allergy and Immunology consists of Fellows of the American Academy of Pediatrics who have been certified by the American Board of Pediatrics and by the American Board of Allergy and Immunology. Any and all qualified American Academy of Pediatrics Fellows are invited to apply for membership in the Section. If interested, please write to: DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF SECTIONS American Academy of Pediatrics 141 Northwest Point Blvd PO Box 927 Elk Grove Village, IL 60009-0927 The reviews contained in this 1988 to 1989 synopsis were written by 28 Fellows of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Allergy and Immunology and by 5 senior fellows in allergy and immunology who contributed reviews under the aegis of their mentors.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 813-814
Author(s):  
Robert D. Burnett ◽  

During the past several years as Chairman of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Committee on Pediatric Manpower I have witnessed the development of the concept of the pediatric nurse associate (PNA) within the specialty of pediatrics. In addition, I have also been aware of the controversies within the AAP membership regarding the role of the PNA in child health care delivery. Many of you will recall the concern of the mid-1960's which widely publicized an impending catastrophic shortage of pediatricians.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 673-676
Author(s):  
James B. Gillespie

The history of the American Academy of Pediatrics is a chronicle of practical idealism. I will not attempt to recount recent and past achievements of our society, for most have been well documented. It is beyond my capacity to identify the changes in Academy role and structure which may occur in our rapidly changing and complex social and medical environment. However, I do wish to reflect briefly on certain recent programs and actions which point up the expanding role and broader scope of interests of the Academy. These actions and interests, hallmarks of maturity and enhanced concepts of responsibility and accountability, are significant of our times. Wisdom has been gained as we have stood upon the shoulders of our predecessors. Today's Academy cannot be separated from the past. We are deeply indebted to the perceptive, astute leadership of other days and to a dedicated membership which, for 44 years, has closely adhered to our stated goals. We continue to value their counsel. The contributions of those who preceded us are the principal reason why we are where we are today. There is justifiable optimism for the assumption that the Academy will continue its leadership role as the major advocate for improved child health in the Americas. I sincerely believe that success will come to a society whose principal objective is placing concern for others higher on the scale of values of more and more people. We are reassured by a membership and leadership dedicated to service above self. In the words of Robert Frost: "There cannot be much to fear in a country where so many right faces are going by.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 849-853
Author(s):  
James C. Overall

THE BY-LAWS of the American Academy of Pediatrics state that at the Annual Meeting, a "Presidential Address shall be delivered." Thus each President is given the privilege of stating his views concerning the Academy whether these views are directed toward the past, present or future, or possibly a summation of all. Any organization is only as strong as its membership and the interest and participation of that membership in the current affairs and problems. Many times, I am sure, all of the State and District Chairmen have had this question asked of them: "What would I get out of being a member of the Academy?" My answer to this question would be: You get out of it almost exactly what you put into it. If you wish to belong to an organization just to have the privilege of saying you are a member, then, of course, you would realize little benefit from that organization. The so-called dead wood in any organization is usually made up of the free riders who do nothing except complain about what is being done or attempted. New and constructive ideas are the main stimulus of most any group but destructive criticism and non-participating members can hinder or at least lessen the progress. Therefore, if I could make but one plea to the membership of the American Academy of Pediatrics it would be to take an active part. Possibly in order to help you decide to take an active part, it would not seem amiss to again remind you of what was stated originally on the purposes of the Academy and I quote directly from the Executive Board meeting in 1931: Purposes of the Academy: 1. To create reciprocal and friendly relations with all professional and lay organizations that are interested in the health and protection of children. 2. To foster and encourage pediatric investigation both clinically and in the laboratory by individuals and groups.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-167
Author(s):  
Steven R. Poole ◽  
Martin C. Ushkow ◽  
Philip R. Nader ◽  
Bradley J. Bradford ◽  
John R. Asbury ◽  
...  

Corporal punishment in school is allowed in 30 states in the United States. The American Academy of Pediatrics, together with numerous other childadvocacy groups, has reaffirmed its position that corporal punishment in schools should be prohibited by state statute in all states.1,2 This article provides background information and recommendations regarding the potential role for pediatricians in attaining this goal.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-431
Author(s):  
Lewis A. Barness

Many have questioned the decision of the American Academy of Pediatrics not to support all of the provisions of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes of the World Health Organization. Some have attributed the AAP stance to allegiances other than to children, but the AAP has long been known for its support of breast-feeding. The AAP has already expressed its concern for the adequacy of the WHO code in a press release and elsewhere. Some of the deliberations of the AAP Committee on Nutrition (CON), while I was its chairman, may be of interest. The AAP Committee on Nutrition has unofficially considered the various drafts of the Code during the past three years and has voiced its suggestions for further revisions, without notable effect.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1954 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 675-677
Author(s):  
ROGER L. J. KENNEDY

PERIODICALLY, it appears to be appropriate and perhaps even necessary to pause for a moment to consider the question, "Where are we going and by what means are we moving along our course?" In the case of the Academy, the answers are to be found in a consideration of the present structure and activities of the components of the group. A very brief, even categorical review of the committees, liaison representatives and official subdivisions will tell us much, and will serve to remind us that we are participants in a great vital program dedicated to the health and welfare of children. Let us first consider the aims and activities of the various committees of the Academy. In the past few years, an increasing awareness of loss of child life through accidents has prompted the Committee on Accident Prevention to survey the causes and to initiate a program of prevention which has received nationwide attention. Unpleasant though it may be to contemplate the prospect of a world engaged in another holocaust of war, the need for preparedness has been recognized at all levels of our civil structure, and in consonance with the emphasis on national alertness, the Academy has established a Committee whose purpose it is to compile information as to the possible needs of children in wartime and the role that pediatricians can play in satisfying those needs, if the occasion demands it. During the lives of most of us, contagious and infectious diseases have become increasingly less common and less severe. In order that the most effective means of controlling, as well as treating, these diseases may be available to all, the Committee on Control of Infectious Diseases has issued and, at intervals, has revised a manual that contains the latest and most reliable information that can be supplied by a panel of experts in the field.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-159
Author(s):  
Henry L. Nadler

Experience gained during the past decade has clearly documented the value of neonatal screening for the early diagnosis of a number of disorders. Many "screening" approaches for the detection of inborn errors of metabolism in the neonate have been utilized, including cord blood sampling, dried blood collected on filter paper during the first week of life, and dried blood or urine collected on filter paper between the second and fourth weeks of life. Despite the fact that interesting and potentially important information has been obtained, the Committee on Genetics of the American Academy of Pediatrics has recommended routine screening, preferably during the first week of life, for only two conditions, phenylketonuria and hypothyroidism.1,2


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-269
Author(s):  
MARTIN H. SMITH

The past four decades have been years of phenomenal progress in all of medicine, yet in terms of numbers of lives saved or in years of productive lives spared, nothing has equaled the record of preventative pediatrics, specifically, our national immunization program. In the past several years, however, this immunization program has almost fallen into shambles. The sources of this reversal would have been from vaccine liability leading to exorbitant costs or loss of supply of vaccines. In the 1970s and 1980s, a series of crises that were only narrowly averted threatened interruption of the national immunization program. It is now worthwhile to trace the events of the past several years so that we can review the continuity of the course of events through those years to understand the necessity for the specific resolution of these problems in the form of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act. The American Academy of Pediatrics played a leading and pivotal role in the long struggle to enact this legislation. It is expected that the act should be the means of avoiding any future threats to our national immunization program through loss of supply. Furthermore, and of equal importance, after time for stabilization and experience with its administration, the act should reduce the cost of vaccines. The courts have dealt with the matter of vaccine injury in an irregular and sometimes unpredictable manner. This legislation should provide a more predictable and just outcome for those few who suffer vaccine injuries. Because this is the first major legislation the Academy has undertaken, the membership should be informed of the time involved in promoting passage of this legislation: the costs in hours by the members, officers, and staff, as well as the monetary costs to the Academy.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-474
Author(s):  
Charles C. Edwards

This replies to your letter dated December 19, 1969, and addressed to Commissioner Ley. Your letter, which represents the stand of the Committee on Drugs of the American Academy of Pediatrics, emphasizes the usefulness of systemic sulfonamides in combination with penicillin in the treatment of acute otitis media in young children where a high incidence of H. influenzae infection is known to occur. Our letter of September 12, 1969, to physicians did not include such an indication when listing the uses of the short-acting sulfonamides. We have received several other expnessions like yours, calling attention to this omission in the indications for the systemic short-acting sulfonamides. I am pleased to be able to tell you that we are about to publish, in the Federal Register, a revised list of the indications for the short-acting, systemic sulfonamides, which will include the indication for use in otitis media due to H. influenzae. Concurrent administration of sulfonamides with adequate doses of penicillin is recommended in the treatment of H. influenzae-caused otitis media. We appreciate very much your letter and your offer of assistance in decisions regarding drug therapy in infants and children. I understand this assistance has been helpful to us in the past, and I believe that the Food and Drug Administration is represented on your Committee. We look forward to still closer cooperation with your Committee and with the Academy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document