scholarly journals ARBITRASE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhibuthabary Muhibuthabary

This paper describes the arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution in Shariah economy. Dispute resolution in general civil religion has resolved through litigation in the religious courts that refer to Article 49 of Law Number 7 of 1989 Jo. Law Number 3 of 2006 Jo. Law Number 50 of 2009 on the Religious Courts. However, there are some interesting cases, one of which is the Islamic economic disputes could be resolved through non-litigation or arbitration process, which refers to the Law No. 30 Year 1999. Now, the Shari'ah economic dispute resolution becomes the object of this study which interesting to study both theoretically and practically, not only because the case is to be part of the absolute authority of religious courts, but also becomes a new knowledge in the field of Islamic Jurisprudence

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
Mrs. Hartini

This study analyzes the meaning and scope in terms of property rights disputes or other disputes on specialis rule of clause (2) Article 50 paragraph (2) of the Law on Religious Courts and its implications to the boundary of the absolute competence between religious court and district court. This research also viewed the practice of disputes settlements deal with the property rights or other disputes on Islamic economics cases. The study was conducted by analyzing the legal regulations and court rulings related to islamic economic cases lodged property rights disputes or other disputes. Research was equipped with primary data and analyzed qualitatively. Penelitian ini mengkaji dan menganalisis makna dan cakupan dalam istilah sengketa hak milik atau sengketa lain pada aturan spesialis, Pasal 50 ayat (2) UU Peradilan Agama beserta implikasinya terkait batas kewenangan absolut antara pengadilan agama dengan pengadilan negeri serta praktik penyelesaian sengketa hak milik atau sengketa lain yang selama ini diputus terkait perkara ekonomi syariah. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menganalisis peraturan hukum dan putusan pengadilan terkait perkara ekonomi syariah yang tersangkut sengketa hak milik atau sengketa lain. Penelitian dilengkapi dengan data primer yang selanjutnya dilakukan analisis secara deskriptif kualitatif.


1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Greene ◽  
Edith Greene

This article describes a course that bridged the disciplines of clinical and experimental psychology and the law. The course included discussion of issues in criminal law, such as the psychology of policing, the reliability of confessions, victimization, plea bargaining, jury decision making, and alternative dispute resolution, and in civil law, such as civil commitment, predicting dangerousness, and child custody. Course objectives, requirements, and teaching aids are outlined, and some thoughts on integrating these diverse topics are included.


Author(s):  
Eve M. Brank

Not all marriages last and unlike other personal relationships, the dissolution of a marriage requires legal involvement to end the relationship. A divorce not only severs a marriage, but it also introduces legal involvement. That legal involvement is in the form of state laws that define how divorces are granted, whether the couple needs to have a formal separation before a divorce can be granted, how property should be divided upon dissolution, and whether formalized spousal financial support should commence. Although the law is involved in each of these issues, there are now more opportunities for the use of alternative dispute resolution options rather than traditional court settings that attempt to give more of the decision making back to the couple.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth Tippett

Mnookin and Kornhauser’s Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law is a critically important work for the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) field because it legitimized the study of negotiation within the legal academy. It did so by tethering bargaining to jurisprudence. Without Mnookin and Kornhauser’s insight that bargaining is a function of legal rules, the law remains confined to its portrayal in a standard first-year curriculum....


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Linda Evirianti

Humans are social beings formed by mutual interests within the scope of the community. In relation to such reciprocity, social phenomena often arise in the form of violence or conflict arising from the existence of different interests, so that with the emergence of conflicts or disputes, the law plays an important role in resolving these conflicts, especially acts of violence against women and children. Through the Rekso Dyah Utami agency, there is an effort to minimize an act of violence. The way it is done is through the assistance of mediators in resolving cases that occurred at Integrated Service Center for Women and Children of Violence Victims (P2TPAKK) Rekso Dyah Utami through mediation practice.Keywords: communication transaction (transactional analysis), mediation, mediator.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Linda Evirianti

Humans are social beings formed by mutual interests within the scope of the community. In relation to such reciprocity, social phenomena often arise in the form of violence or conflict arising from the existence of different interests, so that with the emergence of conflicts or disputes, the law plays an important role in resolving these conflicts, especially acts of violence against women and children. Through the Rekso Dyah Utami agency, there is an effort to minimize an act of violence. The way it is done is through the assistance of mediators in resolving cases that occurred at Integrated Service Center for Women and Children of Violence Victims (P2TPAKK) Rekso Dyah Utami through mediation practice.Keywords: communication transaction (transactional analysis), mediation, mediator.


Yuridika ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujayadi . ◽  
Yuniarti .

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) includes dispute resolution processes and techniques that act as a means for disagreeing parties to come to an agreement short of litigation. Despite historic resistance to ADR by many popular parties and their advocates, some courts now require some parties to resort to ADR of some type, usually mediation. The rising popularity of ADR can be explained by the increasing caseload of traditional courts, the perception that ADR imposes fewer costs than litigation, a preference for confidentiality, and the desire of some parties to have greater control over the selection of the individual or individuals who will decide their dispute. In Indonesia based on the Law No. 30/1999 concerning Alternative Dispute Resolution and Arbitration, ADR is interpreted as alternative to adjudication as it is reflected in the title of the Law No. 30/1999. Based on article 32 the collateral forclosure is enable to be done. The procedure of this were adopting the procedure of the collateral forclosure in civil court.Keyword : Alternative dispute resolution, collateral forclosure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
I Gede Mahendra Juliana Adiputra ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

The existence of competition causes the original brand owner to feel disadvantaged because the sales result has decreased. It is permissible for someone to use another party's mark as long as they ask permission from the trademark owner first. The owner can give trademark rights to other people as agreed in an agreement. The formulation of the problem in this research is as follows: how is the legal protection of trademark rights and how to resolve violations of trademark rights. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of the discussion in this study are as follows: Legal protection of the right to a trademark has been regulated by Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, in the provisions of the Law it is expressly stated that if it has been registered in the law that the right to a trademark has been protected. The sanction imposed on the perpetrator of the crime of trademark rights is a fine of Rp. 20,000,000, - (twenty million rupiah) on condition that if the fine is not paid, he will be subject to imprisonment for 6 (six) months. Settlement of trademark cases can be carried out through institutions that can be used to resolve trademark disputes, including: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration and Courts. Alternative dispute resolution wants the disputing parties to resolve their own dispute with the aim of obtaining a mutual agreement, if the agreement fails, can take arbitration, namely the disputing parties to be able to resolve the dispute to the arbitration institution based on the agreement, furthermore, if the arbitration is successful the last action is through the court, namely the commercial court which has the authority to adjudicate trademark disputes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-267
Author(s):  
Dragan Vujisić ◽  
Milan Rapajić

The authors point to the plurality of forms of consumer protection. Private law form of consumer protection is individual protection in civil proceedings. The protection of the collective interests of consumers in most European legal systems is achieved through litigation. The Consumer Protection Act entrusts the protection of the collective interests of consumers to administrative bodies, which is realized in administrative proceedings, whose rules are characterized by considerable differences in relation to the rules provided by the Law on General Administrative Procedure. A significant unit is dedicated to the mechanism of alternative dispute resolution, especially arbitration and mediation. The shortcomings of the Law on Consumer Protection regarding certain contradictory provisions are pointed out. The legislator stimulates alternative dispute resolution, and on the other hand stipulates that contracting one of these methods does not affect the right to judicial protection. The paper also analyses the inspection.


2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 307
Author(s):  
William Steel

In November 2013, after a series of Law Commission reports and years of academic, professional and judicial discussion, the Government introduced legislation to Parliament to replace the existing High Court commercial list with a specialist commercial panel. Whilst this panel would bring New Zealand into line with many comparable common law jurisdictions, this article argues that the case for specialisation has not been established. In particular, it notes that there is no publically available evidence to support the claim that the High Court is losing its commercial jurisdiction, or that commercial parties are choosing to resolve their disputes offshore or through alternative dispute resolution. Accordingly, this article argues that future research by the Law Commission, or other research agency, is required before specialisation can be justified. In reaching this conclusion, it also examines the issues that may arise if the Government decides to continue with its proposed reform under cl 18 of the Judicature Modernisation Bill 2013, suggesting changes along the way.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document