scholarly journals Efficiency of late conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to everolimus in kidney graft recipients with posttransplant malignancy

Author(s):  
I. G. Kim ◽  
N. A. Tomilina ◽  
N. D. Fedorova ◽  
I. V. Ostrovskaya ◽  
I. A. Skryabina

Malignancy is one of the leading causes of death in recipients with a kidney grafts. The use of proliferative signal inhibitors (PSI) is one of the approaches to solve this problem.Aim: to evaluate the effi cacy and safety of everolimus in combination with reduced dose of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in patients with posttransplant malignancy.Materials and methods.62 kidney graft recipients (KGR) with neoplasia were converted from mycophenolate mofetil to everolimus in combination with reduced dose of CNI at 83.5 ± 69.3 months after transplantation. The duration follow-up was 35.5 ± 26.9 month. The effectiveness of management was assessed by patient survival, type of immunosuppression therapy, renal function and proteinuria. The patient survival in PSI group was compared with the survival in the patients in control group (n = 145), who did not receive everolimus.Results.10-year and 15-year patient survival was 92% and 85,7% in patients treated with PSi versus 61.1% and 52.8% in control group (p < 0.0003). Patients survival with everolimus-therapy after 1 year was 86.5%, after 3 year it was 64.2%, and by the end of 5 years the possibility of treatment with everolimus decreased to 50.8%, mainly due to the proteinuria and other adverse events. The recurrence rate of tumors among patients, who was treated with everolimus for 35 (26; 60) months was 13.2%. Creatinine level in serum increased from 0.13 ± 0.04 to 0.15 ± 0.09 mmol during the treatment (p < 0.031), and the daily proteinuria increased from 0.18 ± 0.25 g/day to 0.75 ± 1.63 g/day, p < 0.011.Conclusion.The usage of PSi improves long-term survival of KTR with posttransplant malignancy and demonstrates a relatively low tumors recurrence rate (13.2%) over a period of 35 months. However this treatment is not suitable for many patients and it was stopped in almost half of them due to increasing proteinuria or serious adverse events. 

2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110069
Author(s):  
Heidi Janssen ◽  
Louise Ada ◽  
Sandy Middleton ◽  
Michael Pollack ◽  
Michael Nilsson ◽  
...  

Background: Environmental enrichment involves organisation of the environment and provision of equipment to facilitate engagement in physical, cognitive and social activity. In animals with stroke, it promotes brain plasticity and recovery. Aims: To assess the feasibility and safety of a patient-driven model of environmental enrichment incorporating access to communal and individual environmental enrichment. Methods: A non-randomised cluster trial with blinded measurement involving people with stroke (n=193) in 4 rehabilitation units was carried out. Feasibility was operationalised as activity 10 days after admission to rehabilitation and availability of environmental enrichment. Safety was measured as falls and serious adverse events. Benefit was measured as clinical outcomes at 3 months, by an assessor blinded to group. Results: The experimental group (n=91) spent 7% (95% CI -14 to 0) less time inactive, 9% (95% CI 0 to 19) more time physically, and 6% (95% CI 2 to 10) more time socially active than the control group (n=102). Communal environmental enrichment was available 100% of the time, but individual environmental enrichment was rarely within reach (24%) or sight (39%). There were no between-group differences in serious adverse events or falls at discharge or 3 months nor in clinical outcomes at 3 months. Conclusions: This patient-driven model of environmental enrichment was feasible and safe. However, the very modest increase in activity by people with stroke, and the lack of benefit in clinical outcomes 3 months after stroke do not provide justification for an efficacy trial. Clinical Trial Registration: ANZCTR 12613000796785 Words: 245


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (18) ◽  
pp. 1073-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Niemeijer ◽  
Hans Lund ◽  
Signe Nilssen Stafne ◽  
Thomas Ipsen ◽  
Cathrine Luhaäär Goldschmidt ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the relative risk (RR) of serious and non-serious adverse events in patients treated with exercise therapy compared with those in a non-exercising control group.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPrimary studies were identified based on The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews investigating the effect of exercise therapy.Eligibility criteriaAt least two of the authors independently evaluated all identified reviews and primary studies. Randomised controlled trials were included if they compared any exercise therapy intervention with a non-exercising control. Two authors independently extracted data. The RR of serious and non-serious adverse events was estimated separately.Results180 Cochrane reviews were included and from these, 773 primary studies were identified. Of these, 378 studies (n=38 368 participants) reported serious adverse events and 375 studies (n=38 517 participants) reported non-serious adverse events. We found no increase in risk of serious adverse events (RR=0.96 (95%CI 0.90 to 1.02, I2: 0.0%) due to exercise therapy. There was, however, an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR=1.19 (95%CI 1.09 to 1.30, I2: 0.0%). The number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome for non-serious adverse events was 6 [95%CI 4 to 11).ConclusionParticipating in an exercise intervention increased the relative risk of non-serious adverse events, but not of serious adverse events. Exercise therapy may therefore be recommended as a relatively safe intervention.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42014014819.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4827-4827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asher Alban Chanan-Khan ◽  
Blanche Mavromatis ◽  
Kanti R. Rai ◽  
Philomena Casey ◽  
Steven Novick ◽  
...  

Abstract Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein closely linked to chemotherapy resistance and inferior survival in patients (pts) with CLL. Genasense(GNS) enhances apoptosis induced by fludarabine (F), dexamethasone, and rituximab (R) in vitro, and has limited single-agent activity in heavily pre-treated CLL pts. Down-regulation of Bcl-2 may further sensitize CLL cells to apoptosis induced by F and R without exposing subjects to the toxicity of alkylating agents. CLL and NHL pts occasionally exhibit a “cytokine release syndrome” (spiking fever, back pain, and occasional hypotension) with GNS treatment. We hypothesized that a “step dosing” approach with GNS, similar to that sometimes used for R, could ameliorate these effects and allow safe and effective combination of this agent with F and R. We are currently evaluating this combination in pts with either previously untreated (UT) or relapsed, previously treated (PT) CLL who require systemic treatment. Eligibility includes: plts ≥ 50,000/mm3; serum Cr ≤ 1.5 mg/dL; adequate organ function; negative Coombs; no history of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. In cycle 1, GNS is given by continuous intravenous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/d days 1 to 7. R is given on a dose-escalating schema (day 4, 125 mg/m2; day 6, 250 mg/m2). F (25 mg/m2/d) is given on days 6 to 8. In subsequent 28-day cycles (up to 6), the dose of GNS is escalated to 3 mg/kg/d days 1 to7 days, with R 375 mg/m2 on day 5 and F days 5 to7. To date, 20 pts have been enrolled (17 PT and 3 UT). Characteristics included: median age, 62 yrs (range 39 to 82 yrs); Rai stage III (2 pts) and IV (6 pts). Prior to administration of either F or R, single-agent GNS treatment at the initial reduced dose in Cycle 1 resulted in a median decrease in lymphocytes of 15% (among all patients regardless of decline in lymphocyte count) (Baseline: 48.3 cells x 103/ml; day 4: 40.1 cells x 103/ml). For the 13 pts who experienced a decline in lymphocyte count in cycle 1 prior to F and R, the median percentage change was 17%, with 4 pts having a &gt; 25% decrease. Three PT pts discontinued from study treatment prior to completing 6 cycles, 2 due to disease progression, and 1 with Grade 3 thrombocytopenia that was unresolved after 4 weeks. Among the 20 pts treated to date (9 ongoing), the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events have been neutropenia, pyrexia and thrombocytopenia. Serious adverse events have been noted in only 6 of 20 pts (all PT pts) and have included 2 pts with fever (1 neutropenic), 2 R infusion reactions, 1 lymph node abscess and 1 tumor lysis syndrome (with sepsis). Conclusions: 20 pts have been treated with combination GNS, F and R. Single-agent activity with GNS has been observed at a reduced dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d in cycle 1. The “step dosing” approach appears to be a well-tolerated, alternative approach to the administration of GNS. Further details of safety and efficacy will be presented.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (10) ◽  
pp. 3547-3551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehab Atallah ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Sherry Pierce ◽  
Mary Beth Rios ◽  
...  

Abstract The rates of expected serious adverse events in patients with acute leukemia on chemotherapy far exceed those in patients with solid tumors. Regulatory authorities require similar reporting criteria, which overburden the investigators and infrastructure with unnecessary documentation. To establish a baseline for expected toxicities before and during leukemia therapy, we reviewed 1534 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia) from 1990 to 2006 who received frontline intensive chemotherapy; 723 (47%) were 60 years or older. Prior to therapy, grade 3/4 cytopenias were observed in 86% of patients. All patients developed one or more grade 3/4 cytopenias during therapy, and more than 90% had a febrile episode. Admission to the intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, and dialysis were required in 28%, 16%, and 7%, respectively. Mortality during induction, 2-week mortality, and 6-week mortality were 20%, 5%, and 16%, respectively. Grade 3/4 renal or hepatic toxicities were observed in 3% and 22% of patients, respectively. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were also common before treatment and during therapy. This paper establishes a baseline toxicity rate for patients with AML during induction therapy, and this could be used as a control group for future reference. Guidelines for reporting adverse events in leukemia studies should be revisited.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Tassorelli ◽  
S Bragg ◽  
JH Krege ◽  
EG Doty ◽  
PA Ardayfio ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lasmiditan (LTN) is a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist for the acute treatment of migraine in adults. We present detailed safety findings from the placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 3 study, of LTN treatment across 4 attacks (CENTURION). Methods Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to LTN 200 mg (LTN200), LTN100, or a control group that received placebo for 3 attacks and LTN50 for either the 3rd or 4th attack (1:1). Safety analyses were conducted for patients who took ≥1 dose of study drug and, in some cases, those who took all 4 doses. Results Overall, 1471 patients treated 4494 attacks. The incidences of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) were - placebo, n=2 (0.4 %); LTN100, n=1 (0.2 %); LTN200, n=2 (0.4 %); no specific treatment-emergent SAE was reported in more than one patient. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, nausea, vertigo, and somnolence; the vast majority were mild or moderate in severity. The incidences of these TEAEs were highest during the first attack and decreased during subsequent attacks. For patients who experienced a common TEAE with the first attack, less than 45 % experienced the same event in subsequent attacks. Patients who did not experience an event in the 1st attack infrequently experienced the same event in subsequent attacks. The time of onset of the common TEAE ranged from ~40 min to 1 h (dependent upon TEAE) and, for individual TEAE, the onset was similar across attacks. Duration was dependent upon TEAE and attack. It was shortest for paresthesia (< 2 h for all attacks); it ranged from 1.8 to 5.5 h for other common TEAEs and was generally similar across attacks. Serotonin syndrome was reported for 2 patients post LTN dosing; there were no meaningful differences across treatment groups in suicidality; there was no evidence of an increase in motor vehicle accidents. Conclusion In this blinded, controlled, multiple-attack study, LTN was associated with generally mild or moderate CNS-related TEAEs of short duration. TEAEs tended to decrease in frequency across the 4 attacks. Trial registration NCT03670810


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubeshan Perumal ◽  
Nesri Padayatchi ◽  
Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma ◽  
Anushka Naidoo ◽  
Dhineshree Govender ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The substitution of moxifloxacin for ethambutol produced promising results for improved tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Methods We conducted an open-label, randomized trial to test whether a moxifloxacin-containing treatment regimen was superior to the standard regimen for the treatment of recurrent tuberculosis. The primary and secondary outcomes were the sputum culture conversion rate at the end of 8 weeks and the proportion of participants with a favorable outcome, respectively. Results We enrolled 196 participants; 69.9% were male and 70.4% were co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). There was no significant difference between the study groups in the proportion of patients achieving culture conversion at the end of 8 weeks (83.0% [moxifloxacin] vs 78.5% [control]; P = .463); however, the median time to culture conversion was significantly shorter (6.0 weeks, interquartile range [IQR] 4.0–8.3) in the moxifloxacin group than the control group (7.9 weeks, IQR 4.0– 11.4; P = .018). A favorable end-of-treatment outcome was reported in 86 participants (87.8%) in the moxifloxacin group and 93 participants (94.9%) in the control group, for an adjusted absolute risk difference of −5.5 (95% confidence interval −13.8 to 2.8; P = .193) percentage points. There were significantly higher proportions of participants with Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (43.9% [43/98] vs 25.5% [25/98]; P = .01) and serious adverse events (27.6% [27/98] vs 12.2% [12/98]; P = .012) in the moxifloxacin group. Conclusions The replacement of ethambutol with moxifloxacin did not significantly improve either culture conversion rates at the end of 8 weeks or treatment success, and was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02114684.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3553-3553
Author(s):  
Elske C. Gootjes ◽  
Eric P. van der Stok ◽  
Lotte Bakkerus ◽  
Tineke E Buffart ◽  
Barbara M Zonderhuis ◽  
...  

3553 Background: For selected patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local treatment of metastases is standard of care based on retrospective reports showing long term survival rates. Local treatment of metastases is technically feasible in an increasing number of patients with multi-organ mCRC. It is unknown if patients with extensive disease will benefit from tumor debulking when added to first line palliative chemotherapy. The ORCHESTRA trial (NCT01792934) was designed to prospectively evaluate overall survival (OS) benefit from tumor debulking in patients with multi-organ mCRC. Methods: Patients with multi-organ mCRC were eligible if > 80% tumor debulking was deemed feasible by resection, radiotherapy and/or thermal ablative therapy. All patients received oxaliplatin based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab. In case of stable disease or response at first evaluation (9 weeks), patients were randomized to continuation of chemotherapy or tumor debulking followed by chemotherapy. Adverse events were reported. If patient withdrawal after randomization was < 10%, the study was deemed feasible. Study continuation was based on the interim report on safety and feasibility after inclusion of 100 (of 478) patients. Results: Patients were randomized to the standard (N = 43) or intervention arm (N = 45). No patients withdrew after randomization. In 6.8% of patients debulking was not performed due to progressive disease (N = 5) or death (N = 1) prior to local treatment. Two patients had no lesions left to treat, 37 patients underwent tumor debulking. In 15 patients (40%) 21 serious adverse events related to debulking were reported, 83.7% of patients had no SAEs or recovered within 30 days. Postoperative 90-day mortality was 2.7% (N = 1). Chemotherapy was resumed in 86.5% of patients, median time to restart was 12.7 weeks (SD 5.6) and 78.4% completed ≥24 weeks of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Tumor debulking is feasible and safe and does not prohibit administration of palliative chemotherapy in the majority of patients with multi-organ mCRC. The ORCHESTRA trial will continue accrual to determine whether the aim of > 6 months OS benefit from tumor debulking will be achieved. Clinical trial information: NCT01792934.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3975-3975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajiv K. Pruthi ◽  
Prasad Mathew ◽  
Leonard A. Valentino ◽  
Stephanie V. Seremetis

Background and Purpose: Bolus infusion (BI) of recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) is effective for the treatment of bleeding and surgical prophylaxis in congenital hemophilia A or B patients with FVIII or IX inhibitors. In principle, continuous infusion (CI) of rFVIIa could maintain the hemostatic effect at a steady state while avoiding the peaks and troughs of repetitive BI. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa CI with rFVIIa BI in major surgery in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. Methods: A 10-day, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted in hemophilia A or B patients (age > 5 yr) with inhibitors to FVIII or FIX who underwent elective major surgery. Patients received rFVIIa as an initial bolus dose of 90 μg/kg followed by intermittent i.v. bolus (90 μg/kg) or i.v. continuous (50 μg/kg/hr) infusion. BI was administered every 2 hours during surgery and through Day 5, then every 4 hours for Days 6 to 10. CI was administered at 50 μg/kg/hr through Day 5 and at 25 μg/kg/hr Days 6 to10. A third control group of 10 non-inhibitor hemophilia A or B patients who underwent similar surgery and were treated with FVIII or FIX (based on current standard of care and physician’s choice) was assessed to compare adverse event and coagulation profiles. Safety was assessed throughout the study periods. Efficacy was defined as having no treatment failures during the given time and was evaluated at 48 hours, 5 days, and 10 days postoperatively. Treatment was considered ineffective in patients who received more than 2 additional doses of rFVIIa beyond the protocol-defined doses during a 24 hour period. Patients who received alternative hemostatic therapy following the permitted two additional doses of rFVIIa were considered treatment failures. Results: Twenty-four patients (12 CI arm, 12 BI arm) underwent 9 major types of surgeries. Knee (n=11) and hip (n=3) replacements were the most common surgeries. Recombinant FVIIa efficacy in major surgeries was 92% (11 CI, 11 BI) at 48 hours; 83% (10 CI) and 92% (11 BI) at Day 5; 83% (10 CI) and 75% (9 BI) at Day 10. Sixty-six rescue doses (rFVIIa, 90 μg/kg) were administered in the CI group (54 in one patient), and 7 in 3 patients in the BI group. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the CI treatment group (239; 141 in one patient) compared to the BI group (89 AEs); 64 AEs occurred in the control group. Eight patients (3 CI, 4 BI, 1 control) experienced 10 serious adverse events (SAEs). SAEs occurred most frequently in the BI treatment group (3 CI, 6 BI, 1 control). The types of SAEs were equally distributed among the three groups. There were no serious thromboembolic events reported during the study. Conclusions: This summary of 24 major surgeries indicates that rFVIIa is effective as prophylactic therapy for major surgery in hemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors. The numbers of patients were too small to distinguish efficacy rates between the two groups. The safety profile for patients treated with rFVIIa (BI or CI) was similar to the profile for non-inhibitor patients treated with other factors. Presented on behalf of the NovoSeven in Surgery Study Investigators.


2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
William H. Stuart ◽  
Jeffrey English ◽  
Donna Court ◽  
John D. Warth ◽  
Steven Yawn

Currently approved disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) are only partially effective. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with intramuscular (IM) interferon beta (IFNβ)-1a (Avonex) in patients with disease that progressed despite treatment. A retrospective chart review of all patients from the MS Center of Atlanta, Georgia, was performed (N ≈1300). Eligible patients had a diagnosis of relapsing MS, were treated with IM IFNβ-1a for ≥12 months before initiation of combination therapy, and were on combination therapy for active disease. In addition, patient records must have contained data on relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, laboratory values, and adverse events. Patients were identified who had been treated with the following in addition to IM IFNβ-1a: pulse corticosteroids only (n = 25), pulse corticosteroids plus mycophenolate mofetil (n = 8), and pulse corticosteroids plus cyclophosphamide (n = 13). The annualized relapse rate was significantly reduced by all three treatments compared with monotherapy (all P ≤.01). For all three groups, no significant improvement was observed with combination therapy compared with monotherapy on evaluations of stable EDSS scores and MRI scans. Three serious adverse events were noted, with two considered related to study medication: one with mycophenolate mofetil (abnormal liver function test results resolved with discontinuation of drug) and one with cyclophosphamide (white blood cell count decrease resolved by withholding one dose). These data suggest that combination therapy is a viable option for the treatment of active MS.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Hyeok Han ◽  
Jung Eun Lee ◽  
Dong Ki Kim ◽  
Sung Jin Moon ◽  
Hyun-Wook Kim ◽  
...  

Of a large body of literature reporting clinical outcomes for patients maintained on peritoneal dialysis (PD), most publications have focused on relatively short-term results. Few reports have focused on long-term survival in PD patients. Here, we present our experience with long-term patient outcomes and further analyses of the trends in demographics and clinical outcomes of 2301 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated with continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) during a 25-year period (1981 – 2005) at our institute. Outcomes were analyzed for 1656 patients, excluding those younger than 15 years of age at initiation of CAPD, those having less than 3 months’ follow-up, or those who had been on hemodialysis or who received a kidney graft before starting CAPD. In the study patients, technique survival at 5 and 10 years was 71.9% and 48.1% respectively. Patient survival was 69.8% and 51.8%. Mean age at the start of PD (50.4 ± 13.9 years vs. 44.2 ± 13.9 years, p < 0.01), ESRD incidence as a result of diabetic nephropathy (30.5% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.01), and incidence of cardiovascular comorbidities (26.6% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.01) were all significantly greater in patients who started PD during the second half of the study period (1993 – 2005) as compared with the first half (1981 – 1992). A multivariate analysis adjusting for these changes in demographics and comorbid conditions revealed that PD therapy starting in 1993 – 2005 was associated with a significant reduction in technique failure [hazard ratio (HR): 0.65; p < 0.01] and mortality (HR: 0.68; p < 0.01) as compared with the earlier period. However, in subgroup analyses, technique survival was not observed to be significantly improved in patients with diabetes. In summary, technique and patient survival have significantly improved despite increases in patient age, cardiovascular comorbidity, and ESRD caused by diabetes. Although diabetes, older age, and cardiovascular comorbidities are not factors that are easily modifiable to improve PD outcomes, results at our institution are encouraging in an era of declining PD utilization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document