scholarly journals Ammonia and carbon dioxide emissions by stabilized conventional nitrogen fertilizers and controlled release in corn crop

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 494-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor Lima de Souza ◽  
Douglas Ramos Guelfi ◽  
André Leite Silva ◽  
André Baldansi Andrade ◽  
Wantuir Filipe Teixeira Chagas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Ammonium Sulfate ◽  
Co2 Emissions ◽  
The Other ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Thermoplastic Resin ◽  
Prilled Urea ◽  
N Fertilizers ◽  
Corn Crop

ABSTRACT The market of stabilized, slow and controlled release nitrogen (N) fertilizers represents 1% of the world fertilizer consumption. On the other hand, the increase in availability, innovation and application of these technologies could lead to the improvement of N use efficiency in agroecossystems and to the reduction of environmental impacts. The objective of this study was to quantify agronomic efficiency relative index, ammonia volatilization, and CO2 emissions from conventional, stabilized and controlled release N fertilizers in corn summer crop. The experiment was carried out in a corn crop area located in Lavras, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, without irrigation. All treatments were applied in topdressing at rate of 150 kg ha-1 N. N-NH3 losses from N fertilizers were: Granular urea (39% of the applied N ) = prilled urea (38%) > urea coated with 16% S0 (32%) = blend of urea + 7.9% S0 + polymers + conventional urea (32%) > prilled urea incorporated at 0.02 m depth (24%) > urea + 530 mg kg-1 of NBPT (8%) = Hydrolyzed leather (9%) > urea + thermoplastic resin (3%) = ammonium sulfate (1%) = ammonium nitrate (0.7%). Thermoplastic resin coated urea, ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate presented low values of cumulative CO2 emissions in corn crop. On the other hand, hydrolyzed leather promoted greater C-CO2 emission, when compared with other nitrogen fertilizers.

scholarly journals Calcium nitrate and ammonium nitrate limestone as sources of nitrogen for oats and barley

1961 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-168
Author(s):  
Pentti Hänninen ◽  
Armi Kaila
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Nitrogen Content ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
The Other ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Malting Barley ◽  
Growing Period ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cent Level

Calcium nitrate and ammonium nitrate limestone (»Oulunsalpietari») were compared as the nitrogen fertilizer for oats in 15 field trials and for barley in one trial. The trials were carried out in summers 1959 and 1960 in various places in Finland. The split plot technique was employed in order to reduce the variation as much as possible. In 1959 the amounts of nitrogen applied as these two fertilizers to the corresponding halves of the plots were 25 and 50 kg/ha. In 1960 also higher applications were used: 75 and 100 kg/ha of N. In three trials these fertilizers were compared both as a surface dressing and worked in. Visual observations suggested about 5—6 weeks after sowing a darker green colour in the stands treated with calcium nitrate as compared with the other half treated with ammonium nitrate limestone. These differences later disappeared. In some trials a higher nitrogen content of the plants from the calcium nitrate stands could be demonstrated during this period. The uptake of nitrogen by plants was regularly followed throughout the growing period. Owing to the large variation, usually, no statistically significant difference between the effect of the fertilizers could be detected. In a few cases the superiority of calcium nitrate could be demonstrated. No differences in the ripening could be found. In most trials there was a fairly regular tendency to higher yields and higher nitrogen content in the grain and straw produced by calcium nitrate. Yet, only in a few cases were the differences statistically significant at the five per cent level. Thus, it was concluded that on the basis of the results of these trials ammonium nitrate limestone and calcium nitrate may be considered practically equal as nitrogen fertilizers for oats. There was no difference in the yields of barley produced by these two fertilizers, but the nitrogen content of grains was significantly lower with ammonium nitrate limestone than with calcium nitrate. This may be worth further study in connection with the production of malting barley.

Fertilisation azotée en forêt de pin gris (Pinusbanksiana). I. Cheminement des engrais dans le sol

1981 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 414-422
Author(s):  
C. Camiré ◽  
B. Bernier
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Ammonium Sulfate ◽  
Nitrogen Availability ◽  
Urea Formaldehyde ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Nitrogen Retention ◽  
Jack Pine ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Original Form ◽  
Coated Urea

Six nitrogen fertilizers (urea, sulfur-coated urea, urea-formaldehyde, ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, and ammonium nitrate) were individually applied, either in fall or in spring, at a rate of 224 kg N/ha and compared for nitrogen retention in the different horizons of a podzol under jack pine. Despite its susceptibility to nitrogen losses through ammonia volatilization, urea was by far, among readily available nitrogen fertilizers, the one whose nitrogen is best retained in soil surface horizons. Retention varied with weather conditions that prevailed immediately after fertilizer application. With the other fertilizers used, nitrogen retention followed this order: ammonium sulfate > ammonium nitrate > calcium nitrate. After four seasons, about 50% of the nitrogen applied as sulfur-coated urea and urea-formaldehyde was still found in its original form. Ammonium sulfate is next to urea among the recommended nitrogen sources for similar jack pine sites, considering that fertilizers with nitrate are prone to leaching and the sulfur-coated urea and urea-formaldehyde used presented problems of nitrogen availability.

VARIOUS FORMS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER FOR BROMEGRASS ON A SOLONETZ SOIL

1968 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Cairns
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Ammonium Sulfate ◽  
Soil Ph ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizer ◽  
The Other ◽  
Solonetz Soil

Ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate and urea, applied to provide nitrogen at a rate of 112 kg/ha annually, were compared as fertilizers for bromegrass on a Solonetz soil. All were equally effective in increasing yield except in the drought year, 1966, when urea was less effective than the others. About 45% of the nitrogen applied as urea was recovered in the crop, compared with over 55% from the other forms. This difference was most pronounced in the driest year. The reduction in soil pH from 5.3 to 4.0 with the use of ammonium sulfate indicated that this was an undesirable source of nitrogen for these soils that are already high in sulfur. Nitrate levels in the crops were highest in the years of adequate rainfall and were generally increased about equally by each fertilizer. However, all crops contained well below recognized toxic levels.

scholarly journals Studies of the influences of different N fertilizers and Microbion UNC bacterial fertilizer on the nutrient content of soil

2010 ◽  
pp. 134-140
Author(s):  
Andrea Balla Kovács ◽  
Anita Szabó ◽  
Emese Bartáné Szabó
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Inorganic Nitrogen ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Nutrient Content ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Organic N ◽  
Total N ◽  
N Fertilizers ◽  
Soil Measurements

A field experiment was conducted to examine the effects of different nitrogen fertilizers in combination with bacterial fertilizer onnutrient uptake of horseradish and plant available nutrients of the soil. Three different N fertilizers, ammonium-nitrate, urea and calciumnitrate(116 kg ha-1 N) in combination with Microbion UNC bacterial fertilizer (2 kg ha-1) were applied as treatments in a randomizedcomplete block design in three replications. In this paper we presented the results of soil measurements. The soil of the experimental areawas chernozem with medium sufficiency level of N and P and poor level of K.Our main results:The amount of 0.01M CaCl2 soluble inorganic nitrogen fractions, NO3--N and NH4+-N and also the quantity of soluble organic-N werealmost the same in the soil. N fertilizers significantly increased all the soluble N fractions. The amount of NO3--N increased to the greatestextent and the increase of organic N was the slightest. We measured the largest CaCl2 soluble NO3- -N and total-N contents in the plotstreated with ammonium-nitrate, the largest NH4+-N in the plots treated with calcium-nitrate and the largest organic-N fraction in plotstreated with urea.Bacterial inoculation also increased both soluble inorganic nitrogen forms and also total-N content of soil compared to the control. Inthe case of combined (artificial and bacterial fertilizer) treatments we measured lower NO3--N, organic-N and total-N compared to thevalues of plots having only nitrogen fertilizer treatments. On the contrary in the plots with combined treatments the CaCl2 soluble NH4+-Ncontent of soil in more cases were higher than that of values with artificial fertilizer treatment.As a function of calcium-nitrate application increased AL-P2O5 and AL-K2O values were measured compared to control. MicrobionUNC supplement of calcium nitrate yielded also increase in AL-P2O5 and AL-K2O values, till then supplement of ammonium-nitrate fertilizeryielded a decrease in these values compared to the control.All nitrogen fertilizers resulted in a significant decrease in AL-Mg content of soil compared to the control. Nevertheless bacterialfertilizer increased AL-Mg values in any cases.

scholarly journals Results from experiments comparing aqueous and anhydrous ammonia with ‘nitro-chalk’ for grass cut for silage

1973 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. V. Widdowson ◽  
A. Penny ◽  
R. C. Flint
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Calcium Carbonate ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Aqueous Ammonia ◽  
The Other ◽  
Anhydrous Ammonia ◽  
N Fertilizers ◽  
Aqueous Urea ◽  
Valid Comparison

SUMMARYIn five experiments made at Rothamsted from 1966 to 1970 ‘Nitro-Chalk’ (ammonium nitrate–calcium carbonate mixture, 21% N) was broadcast for grass cut for silage, either in a single dose in spring or divided equally for three cuts. The ‘Nitro-Chalk’ was used to evaluate anhydrous ammonia (82% N) in 1966, anhydrous ammonia and aqueous ammonia (approximately 26% N) in 1967, 1968 and 1969, and anhydrous ammonia, aqueous ammonia and aqueous urea (18% N) in 1970. All these fertilizers were applied to give 125, 250, 375 and 500 kg N/ha, except in 1968 when 250, 375, 500 and 625 kg N/ha were given.Anhydrous ammonia gave smaller yields (of dry matter) than the other N fertilizers except in 1968, a wet year, when it was at least as good as ‘Nitro-Chalk’, but slightly less good than aqueous ammonia. Yields were larger with autumn- than with springinjected aqueous ammonia and larger with either, than with equivalent single doses of ‘Nitro-Chalk’. Yields with aqueous ammonia were also larger than with ‘Nitro-Chalk’ divided equally for three cuts when more than 375 kg N/ha was tested, but smaller with less. Aqueous urea was as good as a single dose of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ but less good than divided ‘Nitro-Chalk’ in 1970, the only year it was tested. ‘Nitro-Chalk’ divided equally for three cuts gave larger yields than when a single dose of up to 375 kg N/ha was given, but with more N than this a single dose was better.Apparent recovery of N was least from anhydrous ammonia and differed little between autumn and spring injection in 1968, the only year when a valid comparison was possible. Apparent recoveries of N from autumn and from spring-injected aqueous ammonia and from ‘Nitro-Chalk’ broadcast in a single dose differed little, nor did the proportion of the N recovered at each cut. Recovery from ‘Nitro-Chalk’ broadcast in three equal amounts was more uniform, but little larger.Judged by yield, no more than 375 kg N/ha was justified; grass given this amount of N either as aqueous ammonia or as ‘Nitro-Chalk’ removed approximately 29 kg of N, 3 kg of P (7 kg P2O6), 26 kg of K (31 kg K2O) and 2 kg of Mg (3 kg MgO) per tonne of dry matter produced.

Meadow bromegrass response to coated and conventional urea fertilizers

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Malhi ◽  
K. Heier ◽  
M. Zhang ◽  
M. Nyborg
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Forage Yield ◽  
Yield Response ◽  
N Recovery ◽  
N Fertilizers ◽  
Coated Urea ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Meadow Bromegrass ◽  
N Use

In central Alberta, surface-broadcast urea is usually less effective in increasing grass forage yield than ammonium nitrate (AN) due to volatilization loss. A 2-yr field experiment was conducted in 1994 and 1995 on meadow bromegrass (Bromus bibersteinii Roem and Shult 'Regar') at Eckville, Alberta to compare a number of synthetic con-trolled-release urea fertilizers with conventional urea and AN fertilizers for their effect on dry matter yield (DMY), protein yield (PY), N-use efficiency (NUE) and percent N recovery (NR). The N fertilizers were applied at 100 kg N ha−1 in early June of 1994 and mid-April of 1995. The meadow bromegrass was harvested three times during the May to September growing season. In both years there was a significant forage yield response to applied N. In 1994, the DMY, PY, NUE and NR were similar for urea and AN, and most of the treated urea products were inferior to urea alone. This was most likely due to delayed application of N fertilizer until just before the start of summer rains. In 1995, urea had lower DMY (by 874 kg ha−1), PY (by 177 kg ha−1), NUE (by 8.8 kg DM kg−1 N ha−1) and NR (by 27.3%) than AN. Some of the coated urea products (e.g., Sh. 19, Sh. G) gave significantly greater DMY, PY, NUE and NR than urea alone, though still less than AN. These results suggest that under conditions when surface-applied urea is inferior to AN, its effectiveness can be improved by using Sh. 19 and Sh. G controlled-release urea fertilizers on grassland. The controlled-release fertilizers may be more expensive and therefore, additional cost must be considered as compared with AN before using on a commercial basis. Key words: Ammonium nitrate, bromegrass, controlled-release N fertilizers, forage yield, N recovery, urea

Fertilisation azotée en forêt de pin gris (Pinusbanksiana) II. Variations de la masse foliaire et des éléments nutritifs du feuillage de pin gris et de quelques espèces du sous-bois

1981 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Camiré ◽  
B. Bernier
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Ammonium Sulfate ◽  
Urea Formaldehyde ◽  
Nitrogen Concentration ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Jack Pine ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Coated Urea ◽  
Treatment Changes ◽  
Fertilisation Azotée

Fall or spring applications of six different nitrogen fertilizers (urea, sulfur-coated urea, urea-formaldehyde, ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, and calcium nitrate) at a rate of 224 kg N/ha in an 18-year-old jack pine stand induced a very rapid increase of nitrogen concentration in current year and 1-year-old needles, as well as in weight of current year needles. In the latter, nitrogen content (concentration × weight) increased more than 100% the 1st year following fertilization in the ammonium sulfate and the ammonium nitrate treatments applied in spring. Response did not last more than 2 years. Foliar analysis of other elements (P, K, Ca, Mg, and Mn) revealed a reduction of P concentration in the needles sampled the first fall after treatment together with a reduction of Ca and Mn in the current foliage of the second and third seasons after treatment. Changes in nitrogen concentration in Kalmiaangustifolia L. and particularly in Solidagopuberula Nutt. were in good correlation with those observed in jack pine needles.

scholarly journals Kinetics of calcium Cyanamid obtaining process from lime, carbon dioxide and ammonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 260-263
Author(s):  
O.Kh. Panjiev ◽  
A.Kh.Panzhiev
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Ammonium Sulfate ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Agricultural Crops ◽  
High Yields ◽  
Kinetics Of

In Uzbekistan, the main range of nitrogen fertilizers produced is ammonium nitrate, carbamide and ammonium sulfate, the use of which has led to acidification of millions of hectares of land for many years, which negatively affects the receipt of high yields of agricultural crops

Isotopic studies of the nitrogen balance in a cracking clay. IV. Fate of the three nitrogen fertilizers in fallow soil in the field

Soil Research ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 317 ◽  
Author(s):  
ET Craswell
Keyword(s):  
Ammonium Sulfate ◽  
Nitrogen Balance ◽  
Calcium Nitrate ◽  
Nitrogen Immobilization ◽  
The Other ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Field Site ◽  
Loss Mechanism ◽  
Isotopic Studies ◽  
Fallow Soil

Urea, ammonium sulfate and calcium nitrate, labelled with 15N, were added to 30-cm diameter microplots at a cracking clay field site. Sorghum stubble was applied to one series of microplots, while another series was stubble-free. The plots were kept fallow for 14 weeks after which the loss, movement and immobilization of the 15N added in the fertilizers was measured. Losses totalled 9, 23 and 26% of the urea, ammonium sulfate and calcium nitrate respectively. Denitrification, which occurred during the sixth and seventh weeks of the experiment when the soil was waterlogged, was presumed to be the loss mechanism; the differences in rate of loss would then be related to the rate of nitrification of the urea and ammonium fertilizers. Adding sorghum stubble did not influence the rate of loss but caused net immobilization of an extra 5 % of the added nitrogen; immobilization was 11, 11 and 7% in the microplots receiving urea, ammonium sulfate and calcium nitrate respectively. The 155 mm of rain received during the 14 weeks leached 20% of the added nitrate and only 10% of the other fertilizers below 30 cm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document